ichiro adachi for the aerogel rich r&d group kek rich2004 2004.dec.01 study of highly...
TRANSCRIPT
Ichiro Adachifor the aerogel RICH R&D group
KEK
RICH2004
2004.Dec.01
Study of Highly TransparentSilica Aerogel as RICH Radiator
Introduction Aerogel production New solvent and optimization Optical quality Design considerations Conclusions
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 2
Acknowledgements
Coating business promotion group,Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd.
http://www.mew.co.jp/e-aerogel/
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 3
Introduction
Proximity focusing RICH using silica aerogel as Cherenkov radiator (talked by Peter Krizan) PID device in the forward region at the Belle detector Silica aerogel with n=1.05 as baseline design
Requirements on aerogel radiator Transparent
• Excellent quality for downstream tileFor multiple radiator case
(talked by Samo Korpar) Hydrophobic Reasonable size Crack-free
Aerogel radiator
Photodetector
Readout electronics
Cherenkov photon
n=1.05
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 4
Aerogel production
Colloidal formation
Treatment for hydrophobic
Supercritical drying Use CO2 extraction Safer due to low supercritical point
• 31degree & 7.5MPa
nSi(OR)4 + 4nH2O nSi(OH)4 + 4nH2O hydrolysisnSi(OH)4 (SiO2)n + 2nH2O condensation
3-dimensional network
alcohol
cf: methanol: 240degree & 8.1MPa
ammonia
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 5
Aerogel production so far
Lots of experience in making aerogel tiles (1994-1997) For the Belle Aerogel Cherenkov counter ~7000 blocks of 10x10x2cm3 ranging n=1.010-1.030 Optimization done for them
Optical quality gets worse if index goes beyond ~1.04
Tra
nsm
issi
on le
ngt
h(m
m)
Refractive index
drop quickly when n>1.04Transmission length~12mm at n=1.05
at 400nm How to improve?
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 6
New production technique(1)
New solvent introduced:DMF(N,N-di-methly-formamide) Use DMF together with Methanol as solvent
Our trial with DMF Transmission length(400nm)
~40mm for n=1.050 obtained
chemical formula HCON(CH3)2
molecular weight 80.14
usageDissolve various organic c
ompounds
remarks
Low volatility
Stable in normal condition
Avoid breathing vapor
0
10
20
30
40
50
1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08refractive index
transmission length (mm)
Methanol solventDMF solvent
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 7
New production technique(2)
Why DMF effective ? Internal surface area for methanol and DMF samples were compared i
n nitrogen vapor adsorption method
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1st measurement 2nd measurement
Methanol sample
DMF sample
nitr
og
en
su
rfa
ce a
dso
rptio
n(m
2/g
)
BET method from MEW
DMF is expected to help making up higher porosity, suggesting making smaller pores in a sol-gel process
DMF sample has larger internal surface area than methanol one
As a result, higher transparency
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 8
DMF mixing ratio(%)
21.49
25.6823.77
31.84
18.28
33.87
40.63
36.58
25.0023.18
16.61
22.5224.13
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
0 20 40 60 80 100
H2O 24mol
H2O 28mol
H2O 32mol
Optimization using DMF
H2O quantity
T.L
.(40
0nm
)
High transparency with DMF >~ 70%
Clear peak in H2O quantity
Optimization done by making small samples with 40x40x10mm3
MOH only DMF only
25.10
18.28
22.59
36.58
18.43
24.13
11.71
40.63
8.75
31.84
16.172
33.8731.64
22.52
13.33
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
DMF 100%
DMF 85%
DMF 75%
How about larger and thicker sample?
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 9
Large sample production
100x100mm2 with 10/15/20mm thickness Sets of optimized parameters(for n= 1.050) provided from small sampl
es.
produce samples of n= 1.045-1.060
100x100x20mm3 n=1.050
No cracks
Sample we have obtained
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 10
Optical quality- Transmission -
0
20
40
60
80
100
200 300 400 500 600 700 800
parameter set1parameter set2
wave length(nm)
Comparison in transmissions between 2 sets of parameters for 100x100x10mm3 samples
T = A exp( Ct/4) • C: clarity factor• A: surface factor
0
2
4
6
8
10
clarity factor(μm4/ )mm
Clarity factor
set2
set1
mean:0.000633(μm4/mm)
mean:0.000912(μm4/mm)
target n=1.050
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 11
Optical quality- Transmission length -
Transmission length at 400nm
For 13 out of 36 samples, T.L. exceeds 40mm
• A long tail to low T.L. region may suggest a possible instability in alcogel production• More investigation necessary
0
2
4
6
8
10
22.1 24.1 26.1 28.1 30.1 32.1 34.1 36.1 38.1 40.1 42.1 44.1 46.1
transmission length(mm)
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 12
Optical quality- Refractive index -
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
index
target 1.045
target index
measured index
1.045 1.0456 ±0.0003
1.050 1.0518 ±0.0003
1.055 1.0534 ±0.0004
1.060 1.0606 ±0.0005
target 1.050
target 1.055
target 1.060
Refractive index management
Fine tuning will be done
• measured with Fraunhofer method(405nm laser)• systematic error not included
(measured)
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 13
Crack-free sample
Making “crack-free” aerogel tiles is another issue
0 20 40 60 80 100
10mm
15mm
20mm
n=1.05 sample
thickness
# of crack-free/total # of samples(%)
For 10mm thick samples, 100 % crack-free, while 70% if thickness is 20mm
This yield may be improved by tuning mixing ratio at sol-gel process as well as supercritical drying conditions
100x100mm2 cross section
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 14
Hydrophobic feature
Hydrophobic feature tested Aerogel put into water and compare trans
mission between before & after this
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Wavelength [nm]
Transmittance [%]
beforeafter
T.L.(400nm): 25.5mm 28.2mmbefore after
Even better! washing effect?
Hydrophobicity well possessed
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 15
Beam test results
To confirm aerogel quality, beam test has been performed
T.L.(400nm):40.9mmrefractive index:1.053thickness:18.75mm
2003 March beam test
Transmission length(mm)
Npe
2001 beam test
improvement
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 16
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
200 300 400 500 600 700 800
wave_length(nm)
transmission(%)
n=1.050&1.055
Further attempt for multiple-layer aerogel(1)
Multiple-layers in one aerogel tile 2 (or more) layers with different refractive indices Two layers attached directly at molecular level Easy to handle when considering a multiple radiator scheme Insensitive to possible surface effect
n=1.050
n=1.045
“combined” T.L.(400nm)=41.1mm
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 17
Further attempt for multiple-layer aerogel(2)
We will compare various quantities among the following test samples:
n=1.050
n=1.050
n=1.050
n=1.050
n=1.055
crack
transparency
index
boundaryn=1.050
n=1.045
n=1.055
Even triple layers in a single tile produced!
Investigating the best solution
Try more!!!
“aerogel-focusing”
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 18
Design considerationsas RICH radiator(1)
Flatness of aerogel block is important when one stacks or cover a certain area with aerogel tiles
Meniscus causes “gap” between radiators
Aerogel block
This was made by the fact that one surface of an alcogel always faces outside during aging process.
Produce alcogel in the sealed vessel (with a cover) and is left inside it during aging
3 layers (100x100x10mm3 size) stacked
Another merit: surface quality can be better
Gap found ~< 1.0mm
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 19
Design considerationsas RICH radiator(2)
Aerogel tile in hexagonal shape is desirable due to smaller loss of Cherenkov photons at edges Cut into hexagonal shape from square block Machining device of “water-jet” thanks to hydrophobic nature
QuickTime˛ Ç∆TIFFÅiLZWÅj êLí£ÉvÉçÉOÉâÉÄ
ǙDZÇÃÉsÉNÉ`ÉÉÇ å©ÇÈÇΩÇflÇ…ÇÕïKóvÇ≈Ç∑ÅB
QuickTime˛ Ç∆TIFFÅiLZWÅj êLí£ÉvÉçÉOÉâÉÄ
ǙDZÇÃÉsÉNÉ`ÉÉÇ å©ÇÈÇΩÇflÇ…ÇÕïKóvÇ≈Ç∑ÅB
QuickTime˛ Ç∆TIFFÅiLZWÅj êLí£ÉvÉçÉOÉâÉÄ
ǙDZÇÃÉsÉNÉ`ÉÉÇ å©ÇÈÇΩÇflÇ…ÇÕïKóvÇ≈Ç∑ÅB
Surface quality has to be checked in a test beamExcellent precision in angle and length
1cm thick of 1.050 sample
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 20
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 20 40 60 80
day
Araldite(gluing glue onsurface)
DP-190(luing glue onsurface)
Aron Alpha(gluing glueon surface)
Rapid Araldite(gluingglue on surface)
Design considerationsas RICH radiator(3)
How to hold aerogel blocks can be a potential problem in mechanical design Adhesive can deteriorate aerogel optical quality If not, we can use a simple bonding in constructing a real detector
T(4
00nm
) ra
tio
No deterioration when DP-190 is used
DP-190
5th International Workshop on RIng Imaging Cherenkov Counters(RICH2004) 21
Conclusions
Aerogel for RICH radiator has been developed Production of aerogel tiles with n=1.05 has been succes
sfully done and transmission length at 400nm has reached 40mm Issues for a stable production and index management
Optical quality of our samples has been examined in a test beam and improvements confirmed
Further challenges are going on Thicker and bigger blocks Multiple-layer blocks Machining possibility …. etc