identification and characterization of influenza virus entry inhibitors

52
,GHQWLILFDWLRQ DQG &KDUDFWHUL]DWLRQ RI ,QIOXHQ]D 9LUXV (QWU\ ,QKLELWRUV ͳ 7KURXJK 'XDO0\[RYLUXV +LJK7KURXJKSXW 6FUHHQLQJ ʹ 0DUFR :HLVVKDDU 5REHUW &R[ =DFKDU\ 0RUHKRXVH 6KLYD.XPDU .\DVD 'DQ <DQ ͵ 3KLO 2EHUDFNHU 6KXOL 0DR -HQQLIHU ( *ROGHQ $QLFH & /RZHQ 0LFKDHO * 1DWFKXV DQG Ͷ 5LFKDUG . 3OHPSHU ͷ ,QVWLWXWH IRU %LRPHGLFDO 6FLHQFHV *HRUJLD 6WDWH 8QLYHUVLW\ 3LHGPRQW $Y $WODQWD *HRUJLD 86$ ͺ (PRU\ ,QVWLWXWH IRU 'UXJ 'HYHORSPHQW (PRU\ 8QLYHUVLW\ $WODQWD *HRUJLD 86$ ͻ 'HSDUWPHQW RI 3KDUPDFRORJ\ 8QLYHUVLW\ RI :LVFRQVLQ 0DGLVRQ :LVFRQVLQ 86$ ͳͲ 'HSDUWPHQW RI 0LFURELRORJ\ ,PPXQRORJ\ (PRU\ 8QLYHUVLW\ 6FKRRO RI 0HGLFLQH &OLIWRQ 5RDG ͳͳ $WODQWD *HRUJLD 86$ ͳʹ ͳ͵ ͳͶ ͳͷ ͳ WR ZKRP FRUUHVSRQGHQFH VKRXOG EH DGGUHVVHG ͳ ,QVWLWXWH IRU %LRPHGLFDO 6FLHQFHV ͳͺ 3HWLW 6FLHQFH &HQWHU 6WH ͳͻ *HRUJLD 6WDWH 8QLYHUVLW\ ʹͲ 3LHGPRQW $Y ʹͳ $WODQWD *$ ʹʹ 86$ ʹ͵ HPDLO USOHPSHU#JVXHGX ʹͶ SKRQH ʹͷ JVI Accepted Manuscript Posted Online 1 June 2016 J. Virol. doi:10.1128/JVI.00898-16 Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. on April 4, 2018 by guest http://jvi.asm.org/ Downloaded from

Upload: vanquynh

Post on 04-Feb-2017

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

JVI Accepted Manuscript Posted Online 1 June 2016J. Virol. doi:10.1128/JVI.00898-16Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

in silico

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

In silico

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Orthomyxoviridae

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

in trans

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

in silico

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

In silico

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

k

k

k k K

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

in vitro

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

in vitro

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

KD

KD

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

in silico

in silico

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

in silico

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

in silico

in silico

in vivo

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

In

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

μ

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

μ

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

μ μ

μ μ

o pp

pI rac

Sμ μ

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Insert:

P

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

P

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

KD

P

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

KD

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

B101

100

10-1

10-2

10-3

10-4

robu

st Z

-sco

re

0.1 1 10 100 1000% inhibition by plate

2.2

3.4

inactive compoundshit candidates selected for follow-up testing

nano blocker

inactive at counter

confirmed anti-IAV-WSN hitsconfirmed broad spectrum hits

robu

st Z

-Sco

re

72 % inhibition by Plate

selected for developmentcytotoxic hits

142.495compounds

co-infectionIAV-WSN-nanoLRSV-fireSMASh

inactives

IAV Inhibitor

dualinhibitor

RSVinhibitor

inactives

BEAS-2Bdose-response

5-0.039 μ M384 well

primary screen direct counterscreen

IAV Inhibitor

dualinhibitor

RSVinhibitor

metabolicactivity

inactives

BEAS-2Bdose-response3-day exposure10-0.078 μ M

cytotoxicity screen

IAV Inhibitor

dualinhibitor

RSVinhibitor

luciferaseinterference

reporterinterfering

BEAS-2BRSV-renillaVSV-nano

5-0.039 μ M384 well

IAV Inhibitor

dualinhibitor

RSVinhibitor

reporter interference screen

IAV-WSNRSV-A2

yield

inactive

BEAS-2B10-0.04 μ M

12 well

orthogonal counterscreen

BEAS-2B5 μ M

384 well384 well

IAV Inhibitor

dualinhibitor

RSVinhibitor

A

ind. infectionIAV-WSN-nanoLRSV-fireSMASh

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

GRP-71271

IAV-

WS

N ti

ter (

pfu/

ml) IAV-N

L-nanoLuc(%

RLU

of vehicle)107

106

103

105

104

0

80

120

40

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2log10 concentration [ M]

0

80

120

40

metabolic activity

(% of vehicle treated)

GRP-115249

0

80

120

40

metabolic activity

(% of vehicle treated)

107

106

103

105

104

0

80

120

40

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2log10 concentration [ M]

GRP-103594

107

106

103

105

104

0

80

120

40

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2log10 concentration [ M]

B

robust Z-score IAV% inhibition IAV

robust Z-score RSV% inhibition RSV

3.0488

0.420

primaryscreen

(384-well)

direct- andorthogonal

counterscreen

(384-well DR)

WSN-Nano (EC50) 0.28 M cytotoxicity (CC50) >10 M VSV-Nano (EC50) >5 M

GRP-71271 (M=395 g/mol)A

robust Z-score IAV% inhibition IAV

robust Z-score RSV% inhibition RSV

2.9892

>60

primaryscreen

(384-well)

direct- andorthogonal

counterscreen

(384-well DR)

WSN-Nano (EC50) 0.45 M cytotoxicity (CC50) >10 M VSV-Nano (EC50) >5 M

GRP-103594 (M=393 g/mol)

robust Z-score IAV% inhibition IAV

robust Z-score RSV% inhibition RSV

2.7488

>60

primaryscreen

(384-well)

direct- and orthogonal

counterscreen

(384-well DR)

WSN-Nano (EC50) 0.33 M cytotoxicity (CC50) >10 M VSV-Nano (EC50) >5 M

GRP-115249 (M=396 g/mol)

IAV-

WS

N ti

ter (

pfu/

ml)

IAV-

WS

N ti

ter (

pfu/

ml)

IAV-NL-nanoLuc

(%R

LU of vehicle)

IAV-NL-nanoLuc

(%R

LU of vehicle)

0

80

120

40

metabolic activity

(% of vehicle treated)

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

virucidal

80

120

40

0

rel.

RLU

(%

of v

ehic

le)

ns

GRP-7127

1

GRP-1035

94

GRP-1152

49

vehic

le

nsns ns

80

120

40

0

ns

A B C

0

80

120

40rel.

RLU

(%

of v

ehic

le)

0 31 6 9-1time post-infection [hours]

time of addition E minigenome

0

80

120

40rel.

RLU

(%

of v

ehic

le)

100 42 6 8concentration [ M]

GRP-71271GRP-103594

JMN3-003DMSO

D F

G

DMSO JMN-3-003 GRP-71271 GRP-103594 GRP-115249

hemolysis inhibition assay

cell priming

80

120

40

0

rel.

RLU

(%

of v

ehic

le)

nsns ns

GRP-7127

1

GRP-1035

94

GRP-1152

49

vehic

le

receptor binding

rel.

RLU

(%

of v

ehic

le)

ns

GRP-7127

1

GRP-1035

94

GRP-1152

49

vehic

le

GRP-115249

log10 concentration [ M]-2 -1 0 1

abso

rban

ce

0.0

0.8

0.4

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

200 nM400 nM3200 nM6400nM

GRP-103594

0

0.01

0.02

nm

0 50 100 250200150time [sec]

400 nM800 nM6400 nM1.28x104 nM5.12x104 nM

KD=5.40x10-7 MR2=0.8460

inactive GRP-71271 analog

0

0.01

0.02

nm

0 50 100 250200150

200 nM400 nM800 nM3200 nM2.56x104 nM

time [sec]

mock

0

40

80

120

% o

f veh

icle

trea

ted ns

ns

ns

***

-IAV-HA-TfR

75

A

GRP-7127

1

GRP-1035

94

GRP-1152

49

vehic

le

mock

GRP-7127

1

GRP-1035

94

GRP-1152

49

vehic

le

C GRP-71271

0

0.01

0.03

nm

0 50 100 250200150time [sec]

400 nM800 nM1600 nM3200 nM6400 nM

KD=9.10x10-7 MR2=0.8569

0.02

2.56x104 nM

0

0.01

0.03

nm

0 50 100 250200150time [sec]

0.02

GRP-115249

KD=1.8x10-6 MR2=0.9714

onpu

t

elutio

n

flow-th

rough

onpu

t

elutio

n

flow-th

rough

Ag stain

elutio

n

WB

-streptavidin-HRP

75

WB -IAV HA

B

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

A I257T

V323ID85N

K58Q

N154S

T156A

F110L

D

IAV-

WS

N-n

anoL

uc(%

RLU

of v

ehic

le)

80

120

40

0-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0 0.5 1.0

log10 concentration [ M]

K58Q

B

A: triple mutation in HA; adapted to GRP-71271B: double mutation in HA; adapted to GRP-115249C: single mutation in HA; adapted to GRP-103594D: single mutation in HA; adapted to GRP-71271

C

recIAV-WSN-nanoLuc-HA-

recIAV-WSN-nanoLuc-HA-

GRP-71271

GRP-71271 recIAV-WSN-nanoLuc

GRP-103594GRP-115249

*

K58

Q

FP TM

HA2HA1

FP

S-S

*

F110

L

*

N15

4S

*

T156

A

*

D85

N

*

M59

I/M

59L

*

I257

T

*

V323

I

340 2221

LH

A A A

C DB

B

B-loop

SH

IAV-

WS

N-n

anoL

uc(%

RLU

of v

ehic

le)

80

120

40

0-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0 0.5 1.0

log10 concentration [ M]

V323I

80

120

40

0-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0 0.5 1.0

log10 concentration [ M]

T156A

80

120

40

0-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0 0.5 1.0

log10 concentration [ M]

V323I/T156A

80

120

40

0-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0 0.5 1.0

log10 concentration [ M]

I257T

recIAV-WSN-nanoLuc-HA-

IAV-

WS

N-n

anoL

uc(%

RLU

of v

ehic

le)

IAV-

WS

N-n

anoL

uc(%

RLU

of v

ehic

le)

IAV-

WS

N-n

anoL

uc(%

RLU

of v

ehic

le)

IAV-

WS

N-n

anoL

uc(%

RLU

of v

ehic

le)

80

120

40

0-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0 0.5 1.0

log10 concentration [ M]

N154S

80

120

40

0-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0 0.5 1.0

log10 concentration [ M]

D85N/N154S

E

80

120

40

0-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0 0.5 1.0

log10 concentration [ M]

D85N

recIAV-WSN-nanoLuc-HA-

IAV-

WS

N-n

anoL

uc(%

RLU

of v

ehic

le)

IAV-

WS

N-n

anoL

uc(%

RLU

of v

ehic

le)

IAV-

WS

N-n

anoL

uc(%

RLU

of v

ehic

le)

80

120

40

0-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0 0.5 1.0

log10 concentration [ M]

F110L

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

B

stand

ard H

A

V323I/

T156A

K58Q

mock

D85N/N

154S

V323I/

N154S

D85N/T15

6AF11

0L

75

PNGase F

80

120

40

01.5 0.5 0 0.5 1.0

log10 concentration [ M]

V323I/N154S

C

80

120

40

01.5 0.5 0 0.5 1.0

log10 concentration [ M]

D85N/T156A

stand

ard H

A

V323I/

T156A

D85N/N

154S moc

k

V323I/

N154S

D85N/T15

6AK58

QF11

0L

120

80

40

0

ns nsns

ns ns ns

***

A

75

stand

ard H

A

V323I/

T156A

D85N/N

154S

mock

V323I/

N154S

D85N/T15

6A

K58Q

F110L

D

max

]

1

0.01

0 126 18 24

standard HAV323I/T156AD85N/N154SV323I/N154SD85N/T156AK58QF110L

100

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

pH 5.2 pH 5.3 pH 5.4pH 5.2 pH 5.3 pH 5.4

V323

I/T15

6AD

85N

/N15

4SV3

23I/N

154S

D85

N/T

156A

stan

dard

HA

F110

LK5

8Q

pH 5.7pH 5.5 pH 5.6pH 5.2 pH 5.3pH 5.2pH 5.2pH 5.2 pH 5.3pH 5.3pH 5.3 pH 5.4pH 5.4

V323

I/T15

6AD

85N

/N15

4SV3

23I/N

154S

D85

N/T

156A

stan

dard

HA

F110

LK5

8Q

pH 5.7pH 5.5 pH 5.6

IAV-

WSN

HA

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

GRP-71271

PheHA2 88

(B)

TrpHA2 92

(B) LysHA1 308

(B)

ProHA1 300

(B)

AspHA2 90

(A)

ValHA1 301

(B)

LeuHA2 89

(B)

GlnHA2 62

(B)

AlaHA2 65

(B)Tyr

HA1 309(B)

LysHA2 83

(A)

GlyHA2 87

(A)

AspHA2 86

(A)

AspHA2 85

(B)

AsnHA2 79

(A)

GlyHA2 67

(B)

ThrHA2 64

(B)

ValHA2 66

(B)

AspHA2 85

(A)

LysHA1 308

(A)LysHA2 83

(B)

ProHA1 300

(A)

LeuHA2 89

(A)

AlaHA2 65

(A)Trp

HA2 92(A)

ValHA2 66

(A)

TyrHA1 309

(A)

GlnHA2 62

(A)

PheHA2 88

(A)

A 400 nM800 nM1600 nM3200 nM6400 nM

GRP-71271 (HA2 M59I)0.02

0 50 100 250200150 time [sec]

( )

0

0.01

nm

KD=1.00x10-6 MR2=0.9603

0

0.01

0.02

0 40 80 140120 time [sec]

nm

50 nM800 nM1600 nM3200 nM6400 nM

KD=5.40x10-5 MR2=0.8407

GRP-115249 (HA2 M59I)

GRP-71271 (HA2 D85N/N154S)

0

0.01

0.02

0 50 100 250200150 time [sec]

400 nM800 nM1600 nM3200 nM6400 nM

KD=6.7x10-7 MR2=0.9638

0.03

nm

GRP-115249 (HA2 D85N/N154S)

0

0.01

0.02

0 20 60 16012080 time [sec]

nm

400 nM800 nM1600 nM12800 nM25600 nM

KD=5.8x10-6 MR2=0.8684

B

AspHA2 85

LysHA1 308

(A)

AspHA2 85

(A)

AspHA2 90

(B)

AspHA2 86

(B) LysHA2 83

(B)

GlyHA2 87

(B)

TyrHA1 309

(A)

GlnHA2 62

(A)

ProHA1 300

(A)

LeuHA2 89

(A)

AlaHA2 65

(A)

TrpHA2 92

(A)

PheHA2 88

(A)

GRP-103594 GRP-115249

AsnHA2 82

(A)

PheHA2 63

(B)

C

D

polaracidicbasicgreasy

backbone acceptorbackbone donor

sidechain acceptorsidechain donor proximity contour

ligand exposurereceptor exposure

arene-H

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

GRP-71271 GRP-103594

LysHA2 71

(A)

AspHA2 89

(A)Glu

HA2 88(A)

GluHA2 72

(A)

LysHA2 85

(A)

GluHA1 87

(A)

LysHA1 269

(A)

AsnHA2 84

(A)

GluHA2 81

(A)

PheHA2 73

(A)

LeuHA1 300

(A)

LysHA1 307

(A)

LysHA2 86

(A)

LeuHA1 300

(A)

ProHA1 299

(A)

ValHA2 69

(A)

TrpHA2 86

(A)

LeuHA2 92

(A)

PheHA2 91

(A)

AsnHA2 63

(A)

GlnHA2 65

(A) GlyHA2 90

(A)

TyrHA1 308

(A)

HisHA1 298

(A)

ThrHA2 301

(A)

AspHA2 89

(A) GluHA2 67

(A)

AspHA2 93

(A)

AspHA2 89

(A)

AspHA2 93

(A)GluHA2 88

(A)GluHA2 67

(A)

LysHA2 86

(A)

LysHA1 307

(A)

TrpHA2 86

(A)

LeuHA2 92

(A)Pro

HA1 299(A)

PheHA2 91

(A)

ValHA2 69

(A)

TyrHA1 308

(A)

ThrHA1 301

(A)

GlyHA1 90

(A)

GRP-115249

polaracidicbasicgreasy

backbone acceptorbackbone donor

sidechain acceptorsidechain donor proximity contour

ligand exposurereceptor exposure

arene-H

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

PheHA2 88

(B)

TrpHA2 92

(B) LysHA1 308

(B)

ProHA1 300

(B)

AspHA2 90

(A)

ValHA1 301

(B)

LeuHA2 89

(B)

GlnHA2 62

(B)

AlaHA2 65

(B)Tyr

HA1 309(B)

LysHA2 83

(A)

GlyHA2 87

(A)

AspHA2 86

(A)

AspHA2 85

(B)

AsnHA2 79

(A)

GlyHA2 67

(B)

ThrHA2 64

(B)

ValHA2 66

(B)

AsnHA2 82

(A)

PheHA2 63

(B)

GRP-71271 (EC50 0.05 μ M)

GRP-71271-2 (EC50 3.6 μ M)

PheHA2 88

(A)

ProHA1 300

(A)

ValHA2 66

(A)

AlaHA2 65

(A)PheHA2 63

(A)

TrpHA2 92

(A)

LeuHA2 89

(A)

ValHA1 301

(A)

AspHA2 85

(A)

AspHA2 86

(B)

AspHA2 90

(B)

LysHA1 308

(A)

LysHA1 83

(B)

GlyHA2 67

(A)

TyrHA1 309

(A)Asn

HA2 82(B)

GlyHA2 87

(B)

ThrHA2 64

(A)

GlnHA2 62

(A)

AlaHA2 65

(A)

AsnHA2 82

(B)

GlyHA2 67

(A)

AlaHA2 65

(A)

AspHA2 85

(A)

AspHA2 90

(B)

AspHA2 86

(B)

PheHA2 88

(A)GlyHA2 87

(B)Thr

HA2 64(A)

GlnHA2 62

(A)

ProHA1 300

(A)

ValHA2 66

(A)

TrpHA2 92

(A)

ValHA1 301

(A)

TyrHA1 309

(A)

LeuHA2 89

(A)

LysHA1 83

(B)

LysHA1 308

(A)

LysHA1 308

(A)

AsnHA2 79

(B)

GRP-71271-8 (EC50 8.7 μ M)

GRP-71271-1 (EC50 10 μ M)

AspHA2 90

(B)

AspHA2 86

(B)

AspHA2 85

(A)

LysHA1 308

(A)

GlnHA2 62

(A)

TyrHA1 309

(A)

ValHA2 66

(A)

AlaHA2 65

(A)PheHA2 63

(A)

LysHA1 83

(B)

GlyHA2 67

(A)

AsnHA2 82

(B)

GlyHA2 87

(B)

ThrHA2 64

(A)

TrpHA2 92

(A)

ValHA1 301

(A)

LeuHA2 89

(A)

PheHA2 88

(A)

ProHA1 300

(A)

polaracidicbasicgreasy

backbone acceptorbackbone donor

sidechain acceptorsidechain donor proximity contour

ligand exposurereceptor exposure

arene-H

on April 4, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from