Identifying priorities for adaptation planning

and mobilising resourcesNAP Expo

08-12 April 2019, Songdo, Rep. of Korea

Countries’ building blocks to

formulate & implement NAPs

Define/strengtheninstitutional

arrangements

Consolidate the evidence base (climateinformation & CVRA,

options appraisal, impacts, etc.)

Integrate CCA intodevelopment plans and

budgets

Strengthen M&E, and reporting

Enhance public and private financing for CCA

Cap

acit

yB

uild

ing

and

Ou

trea

ch

Process to identify

adaptation planning priorities

Sensitisation of stakeholders

Stocktaking (Baseline, gaps, needs analysis)

Coordination & alignment with NDCs,

SDGs,developmentplans, etc.

Trainings (proposaldevelopment,

gender, adaptation options appraisal)

Identification of priorities

Stakeholders’ Consultation &

Validation

Theory of Change – Example of

Benin

NAP process – Example of Niger

May 2014 – Launch of the NAP process –stock-taking done,

national consultations done

November 2016 – First submission of GCF NAP readiness proposal – 3

review rounds

January 2018 -Approval of GCF NAP readiness proposal

Feb. 2018 - Approval ofGEF PIF

2020 - Compilation and communication of

National Adaptation Plan

2021 - Expected end ofimplementation of GCF NAP readiness project

Expected outcomes of GCF NAP readiness proposal

National mandate, strategy, and steering mechanisms in place and gaps addressed

Preparatory work(V&A, etc.) for the NAP

undertaken to develop a knowledge base and

compile the NAP

NAP implementationfaciltated

M&E and reporting mechanisms in place

Funding strategy for NAP in place

Best practices to access GCF NAP funds

• Be familiar with the GCF Readiness Guidebook and especially the 10 GCF Criteria (Annex 3): Anchoring in national vision, address specific vulnerabilities and climate impacts, adaptation financing strategy, theory of change, avoid duplication of effort, stakeholder engagement, gender, private sector, M&E, coherence and complementarity with other Funds

• Consultations and engagement of key stakeholders are key! to ensure consensus at national level and country ownership, optimize relevance and adequacy of activities, avoid duplication

• Undertake a thorough stocktaking exercise: considerable background information is required in the proposal to show compliance with the 10 criteria

• Build a coherent proposal with a strong baseline and rationale and theory of change

• Agree on the operational aspects of implementation: direct access or access through delivery partner, main executing entity, key stakeholders, staffing and resources required

▪ Deepened follow-up technical tailored support, including: baseline analysis & indicators setting, institutional gaps & needs analysis, coordination arrangements & alignment with NDCs, RVA, Identification of adaptation planning priorities and support to proposal development

One-on-one support to LDCs

▪ 3-4 training workshops planned in 2019, including one workshop in collaboration with the LEG for accelerating NAPs in LDCs (see UN Environment update)

Training workshops

Upcoming activities

*

▪ Technical sessions on accelerating adaptation planning and sharing best practices at Gobeshona 5 Conference,Climate Summit, COP 25

▪ Development of 3 web-based trainings/e-learning courses in collaboration with partners

▪ Conduct of webinars and thematic discussions

▪ 9 new NAP Country briefings + translation into French, Spanish and Portuguese of current and future briefings where required

Knowledge management

Upcoming activities

For more information:Julie TengTechnical Specialist, NAPUNDPJulie.teng@undp.org

Tunnie SrisakulchairakProgramme OfficerUN Environment ROAPSrisakulchairak@un.org

Visit: ▪ globalsupportprogramme.org▪ adaptation-undp.org

Thank you for

your attention

Problems & Objectives Trees

Step 1: Developing YOUR Problem Tree

•Divide into groups

•Use the flipchart/whiteboard

• Inclusive discussions

•Reflect on structure

•Report on your findings

Step 2: Develop an Objectives Tree

1. Now, reverse negative statements from the problem tree into positive ones:• Imagine that the problem has already been solved!• “Reduced fisheries capture” → “sustained fisheries capture”

2. Modify the “causes” so they lead to the desired effects

• “Habitat changed → habitat restored”• Thus, root causes become root solutions• Convert your problem tree to an objectives tree