iflip flipping the classroom in adult...

Project number

…………

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only

of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

iFlip Flipping the Classroom in Adult

Education

IO 6 PILOTING – FTC pilot course

implemenation and evaluation

NATIONAL PILOTING REPORT

Partner: AHE (Poland)

Project number

…………



Table of Contents

1. Introduction

1.1. Date, place and duration of the piloting sessions

1.2. Number of students (adult learners) included in the piloting

1.3. Number of trainers/teachers included

2. Reference Documents

3. Training programme

4. Evaluation of the questionnaires

4.1. Piloting-learners questionnaire 4.2. Piloting-educators questionnaire 5. Photos

6. Other comments and suggestions

Project number

…………



1. Introduction

The information about:

Date, place and duration of the piloting sessions

Number of students (adult learners) included in the piloting

Number of trainers/teachers included

The iFlip piloting courses in Poland took place from January 8 to January 19, 2018 at

Akademia Humanistyczno-Ekonomiczna w Łodzi, Poland. Each course was planned for one

course days and included 6 hours per day.

The piloting offered 3 courses which topics covered:

Course 1: “Kultura w firmie – to sprawa rozwojowa” – “Organsational Culture - as a

key to the organisational development”, https://kursy.puw.pl/course/view.php?id=246

Course 2: “Powiększ zasoby grupy. Jak pracować w zespole?” – „Increase the groups

resources. How to work in teams?”, https://kursy.puw.pl/course/view.php?id=247

Course 3: “Coping – radzenie sobie ze stresem” – “How to cope with stress in a

workplace”, https://kursy.puw.pl/course/view.php?id=248.

The number of students (adult learners) included in the piloting courses: 30 students – 10

persons in each of three groups – courses.

There were 2 trainers involved: Ms. Aneta Poniszewska and Ms. Magdalena Zgraja.

Moreover, the courses were also observed by Mr. Łukasz Wilczyński.

2. Reference Documents

Training materials used related to this piloting.

The trainers worked with iFlip courses and materials prepared according the rules and

principles of FTC, Flipped Classroom methodology. These courses are available on the

Moodle platform supported by AHE.

The trainers prepared and used the files, pictures, videos, clips and websites needed for the

courses.

3. Training programme

Add the training schedule

The training programme for the single course day was followed according to the Flipped

Classroom methodology and the courses prepared by the trainers based on the Joint staff

training events realized in Gent, Belgium, April 2017.

Project number

…………



4. Evaluation of the questionnaires

4.1. Questionnaires for adult learners

Personal Data

1. Age

25-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 more

No 3 9 7 8 3

% 10 30 23.33 26.67 10

0

2

4

6

8

10

25-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 more

Age of adultlearners

2. Gender

male female

No 7 23

% 23.33 76.67

0

5

10

15

20

25

Female Male

Gender

Adult learners – Please give your opinion about the iFlip pilot course programme

referring to following criteria:

1. Can you make use of the learning contents in your daily life?

very positive positive neutral negative very negative

Project number

…………



No 14 12 4

% 46.67 40.00 13.33

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

very

positive

positive neutral negative very

negative

Can you make use of the learningcontents in your daily life?

What did you like the best? What would you change?

Searching of needed information, founding the information Not clear tasks, not clear commands

More time for the course, too short duration of the course

2. Did the learning contents correspond with your personal interests?


No 11 12 7

% 36.67 40 23.33

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

very

positive


negative

Did the learning contents correspondwith your personal interests?


New competences Diversify the tasks, more pictures

Project number

…………



Elaborate the commands, which are not coherent

More hours for the course

3. Was training time appropriate for the complete course?


No 6 8 7 5 4

% 20 26.67 23.33 16.67 13.33

012345678

very

positive


negative

Was training time appropriate forthe complete course?

4. Did you like the iFlip approach in general?


No 10 12 8

% 33.33 40 26.67

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

very positive positive neutral negative very

negative

Did you like the iFlip approach ingeneral?


Way of teaching More hours

Answer the questions in details Elaborate the commands

taking the time to present the tasks More topics

Project number

…………



5. Was the trainer able to answer your questions?


No 11 15 4

% 36.67 50 13.33

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

very

positive


negative

Was the trainer able to answeryour questions?

6. Do you think the iFlip method help in learning and understanding better the course?


No 11 15 4

% 36.67 50 13.33

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

very

positive


negative

Do you think the iFlip method helpin learning and understandingbetter the course?

7. Did the trainer take enough time to explain the questions?


No 10 15 5

% 33.33 50 16.67

Project number

…………



0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

very

positive


negative

Did the trainer take enough timeto explain the questions?

8. Do you find the iFlip method easy to use?


No 5 13 9 2 1

% 16.67 43.33 30 6.67 3.33

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

very

positive


negative

Do you find the iFlip methodeasy to use?

9. Do you find the iFlip method helpful in learning the course?


No 12 8 8 2

% 13.33 26.67 26.67 6.67

Project number

…………



0

2

4

6

8

10

12

very

positive


negative

Do you find the iFlip methodhelpful in learning the course?

10. Were the instructions of the course exercises clear for you?


No 10 10 5 5

% 33.33 33.33 16.67 16.67

0

2

4

6

8

10

very

positive


negative

Were the instructions of thecourse exercises clear for you?

11. Was the number of learners appropriate?


No 10 10 10

% 33.33 33.33 33.33

Project number

…………



0

2

4

6

8

10

very

positive


negative

Was the number of learnersappropriate?

12. Was the level of learners appropriate?


No 7 16 3 3 1

% 23.33 53.33 10 10 3.33

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

very

positive


negative

Was the level of learnersappropriate?

13. Was the equipment appropriate?


No 8 10 7 3 2

% 26.67 33.33 23.33 10 6.67

Project number

…………



0

2

4

6

8

10

very

positive


negative

Was the equipmentappropriate?

14. Would you recommend the iFlip course training to others?

definitely

probably yes

maybe probably no no

No 12 12 6

% 40 40 20

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

very

positive


negative

Would you recommend the

iFlip course training toothers?

15. Additional comments, suggestions, recommendations etc.

6 Form and topics not interesting

More hours for the course, more such courses for adult learners

4.2. Questionnaires for Educators

Personal Data

1. Age

25-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 more

No 1 2

Project number

…………



%

33.33 66.67

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

25-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 more

Age of educators

1. Gender

male female

No 3

% 100

Educators – Please give your opinion about the iFlip pilot course programme referring

to following criteria:

1. Do you find the iFlip approach useful for learning of your course?


No 1 2

% 33.33 66.67

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

very

positive


negative

Do you find the iFlip approachuseful for learning of yourcourse?


Methodology of the work More time for the course, too short duration of the course

Project number

…………



2. Do you think the course content satisfying for learners?


No 2 1

% 66.67 33.33

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

very

positive


negative

Do you think the course contentsatisfying for learners?


3. Efficiency of duration of the course training.


No 2 1

% 66.67 33.33

Project number

…………



0

0,5

1

1,5

2

very

positive


negative

Efficiency of duration of thecourse training

4. Efficiency of scope of the course training.


No 1 2

% 33.33 66.67

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

very

positive


negative

Efficiency of scope of the coursetraining

5. Methods and instruments used for teaching.


No 1 2

% 33.33 66.67

Project number

…………



0

0,5

1

1,5

2

very

positive


negative

Methods and instruments used forteaching

6. Interest of learners for presented materials of your course.


No 2 1

% 66.67 33.33

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

very

positive


negative

Interest of learners forpresented materials of yourcourse

7. Interest of learners for presented content of your course.


No 3

% 100

Project number

…………



0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

very

positive

neutral very

negative

Interest of learners forpresented content of yourcourse

8. Learning effect of iFlip approach in your course.


No 1 2

% 33.33 66.67

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

very

positive

neutral very

negative

Learning effect of iFlipapproach in your course

9. Use of iFlip materials.

very positive positive neutral negative

very negative

a. reader-friendliness

No

3

% 100

b. completeness

No

1 2

% 33.33 66.67

c. appropriateness for the needs of adult learners

No

3

% 100

d. user-friendliness No

3

Project number

…………



for trainers % 100

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

very

positive


negative

Use of iFlip materials

a.reader-friendliness

b.completeness

c.appropriateness for theneeds of adult learners

d. user-friendliness fortrainers


possibility of individual attitude

appropriate amount of time to explain the tasks

10. What was the size of your group? Did the size of the group be appropriate?


No 1 2

% 33.33 66.67

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

very

positive

neutral very

negative

What was the size of yourgroup? Did the size of thegroup be appropriate

11. Was the level of the learners according to ICT tools appropriate to the course?


Project number

…………



No 3

% 100

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

very

positive

neutral very

negative

Was the level of thelearners according toICT tools appropriateto the course?

12. Was the room equipment appropriate?


No 3

% 100

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

very

positive

neutral very

negative

Was the room equipmentappropriate?

13. Do you have recommendations to improve the methodology?

desire to learn, the hard work of the participants

14. Would you recommend the iFlip training to others?

Project number

…………



definitely

probably yes

maybe probably no no

No 3

% 100

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

very

positive

neutral very

negative

Would yourecommend the iFliptraining to others?

15. Additional comments, suggestions, recommendations etc.

too little time

5. Photos

6. Other Comments and Suggestions