iil - civicweb

I MUNICIPALITY OF BRIGHTONI 35 ALICE STREETL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING

MEETING DATE: March 10, 2008 TIME: 6:3 0 P.M.

- AGENDA -

1. CALL TO ORDER — Chairperson — Emily Rowley

2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA -

3, DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTERESTS —

4. DELEGATIONS> Peak Engineering — Multi-use Facility

5. DEPARTMENT REPORTS -

(1) Parks & Recreation - Jim MiflarCMO Accreditation

(2) Public Safety — Fire Chief Harry Tackaberry> Incident Type Report — Feb/08 & Feb/07

Officers Meeting — March 4)08> Additions — 2007 Annual Report

(3) Planning & Development Services — Ken Hurford> Building Permit Report — Feb/08> By-law Enforcement Report — Feb/08> Proposed Bell Mobility Cellular Communication Tower> Antenna Siting Protocol

(4) Public Works & Environmental Services — Jim Phillips> 2007 Annual Compliance Report — Drinking Water Quality> 2007 Annual Report - Wastewater Pollution Control Plant

6. CORRESPO’TDENCE AND MEMBER REPORTS - NONE

7. QUESTION PERIOD

8. IN CAI’WR& SESSION (if required)

9. ADJOURNMENT

-

—

Municipality of Brighton

RFP 2008-01

Dressinq Room & Multi-Use Expansion

Attachment #2

Paae 1 of I

FORM OF PROPOSAL

SCHEDULE I - GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

a.t

CONTRACTOR’S NAME 4L-ç-bi

GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Quotation shall include the cost to provide all labour, material, supervision, tools and equipment to carry

out the renovation to the municipal arena at 75 Elizabeth Street as described in RFP 2008-01 -

Stipulated Price Break down:

Design Fees (te tqi/-a L

Site work

___________

Building Envelope

___________

Permit fees

___________

Emergency Power

____________

Plus 8% Provincial Sales Tax

____________

Plus 5% G.SJ.

TOTAL Stipulated$_z,1z,ac.-

SCHEDULE II - EXPERiENCE and SUB-CONTRACTORS

1. Experience Summary

Provide a list of projects of a similar size and type that have been completed by your company

during the past five years.

f.apaa- ç - a. pc. a

c.c_ ..oc..r—%a.at ‘I th. EC_Ti01_ iS .0

2. Sub-Contractors

Provide a list of sub-contractors that you propose to use on this contract.

To a

Bzi-4g 2@ø 11:68 £134752599

PUBLIC WORKS

tzg.

a;t54€.ooc

CaL

-

$ -

$ i..ac-L. — cn

$ LoZ€o

Note: This sheet is to filled and out and inserted into envelop #2

March 10th, 2008— Council of the Whole

Director’s Report — Parks and Recreation

Staffing:

As the ice season winds dowa part time winter staff will be laid off March 30th whichcoincides with the last day of ice rentals. The ice will be out of the arena by the 1 ofApril.

Summer student positions will be advertised the first week of April for various labourerpositions. I am still awaiting word as to whether or not minor hockey is interested intaking on the ball canteen for the summer.

Other:

see attached letter from AIvICTO regarding CMO accreditation.

Jim Millar

i!i AMCTOIII THE MUNICIPAL EXPERTS

February 26,2008

Jim Miller, CMODirector of Parks & RecreationMunicipality of Brighton35 Alice Street PC Box 189Brighton, Ontario KOK 1HO

Dear Mr Millar

This letter is to confirm that the Board of Directors of the Association of Municipal Managers,

clerks and Treasurers of Ontario (AMCTO) approved your application for accreditation as a

Certified Municipal Officer (CMO), at its’ meeting on February 22, 2008.

I am pleased to offer my congratulations to you on attaining this plateau and for the ongoing

commitment to municipal excellence, which the designation represents. You are now

authorized by the Association to use the “CMO” designation. This privilege is extended to

you by AMCTO with the proviso that you retain your membership in good standing. The

CMOaccreditation is for a five-year term:You will be required to re-certify prior to the

Annual Meeting June 2013. Enclosed with this letter is your 2008 income tax receipt for

your CMO application fee.

For immediate recognition of your successful application, your name will be listed under

‘Municipal Memos9n the Mayliune 2008 issue of the Municipal Monitor Your CMO lapel pin

will be presented by the AMCTO Président or designate at the Spring 2008 Zone 5 meeting

April and the formal presentation of your CMO plaque will take place at the AMCTO

Annual Meeting, Awards Luncheon in Niagtha Falls, Ontario on June 10,2008. A formal

invitation to the Awards Luncheon will be forwarded to you in March 2008. We ask that you

RSVP the invitation as per the directives to assist us in our conference logistics.

Congratulations again on your significant achievement. We are confident that your journey

in attaining the CMO designation will inspire your fellow municipal professionals to emulate

your commitment to your profession.

Sincerely

Andrew Koopmans, CMAExecutive Director

End.

AMflO (ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL MANAGERS, CLERKS AND TREASURERS OF ONTARIO)

7Mfl SLvmark Avenue Suite Qi 0. Misciscauiga. Ontarin L4W 3L6

Brighton District Fire Department

Incident Type Report (Summary)

Alarm Date Between (02/01/2008) And {02/29/2008}

Ill Building fire

3 Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents311 Medical assist, assist EMS crew322 Vehicle accident

S Service Call551 Assist police or other agency

6 Good Intent Call611 Dispatched & canceled en route

7 False Alarn & False Call700 False alarm or false call, Other

3 11.53% $95,000 100.00%

2

2

1

2

11.53% $95,000

46.15% $023.07% SO

69.23% $0

7.69% $0

7.69% $0

3.84% 50

3.84% $0

7.69 $0

100.00%

0.00%

0.00%

2 7.69% $0 0.00%

Total Incident Count: 26 Total Est Loss: $95,000

Page

)

Pct of Total Pct ofIncident Type Count Incidents Est Loss Losses1 Fire

3

12

6

18

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

1

0.00%

0.00%

03/04/2008 10:221


130 Vehicle fire

Incident Type Report (Summary)

Alarm Date Between {02/O1/2007} And 102/28/2007}

1 3.33% $0 0.00%

3 Rescue & Emergency Nedical Service Incidents

5 Service Call

554 Assist other fire department

Total Incident Count: 30 Total Eat Loss: $0

4:7)

Pat of Total Pat of

Incident Tyce Count Incidents Eat Loss Losses

1 Fire1 3.33% $0 0.00%

311 Medical assist, assist EMS crew

322 Vehicle accident

4 Hazardous Conditions (Ho fire)

410 Gas Leak

424 Carbon monoxide

$0 0.00%

$0 0.00%13 43.33%

9 30.00%

22 73.33%

2 6.66%

1 3.33%

3 10.00%

2 6.66%

2 6.66%

2 6.66%

2 6.66%

$0

$0

$0

$0

so$0

$07 False Alarm & False Call

700 False alarm or false call, Other

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0. 00%

$0 0.00%

)3/04/2006 10:231

Brighton District Fire DepartmentOfficers Committee Meeting March 4th, 2008 at 6:30 p.m.

PRESENT: Han-v Tackabeny, Lloyd Hutchinson. Jim Dunk, Bill Dingman, Briane Ryckman,Gay Cedrone/secretaiy

Absent: Brian Brose. Wayne Newman, Kory Hietala, Jeff Ogden send regrets

MINUTES OF February 5th, 2008 were read, motion to accept the minutes as printed movedby Lloyd Hutchinson seconded by Briane Ryckman. Motion Carded.Errors or Omissions: Nil

BUSINESS ARISING FROM MINUTESProbationary Rate Probationary rate has been increased to $13.00/per hour.Defibriflrs have to wait till March 20 to finish recertification training, Harry’ to call LifelineERT tomorrow in regard to training.

OLD BUSINESSTruck Tender forms were reviewed by Brian, Harry & Jim. Tender closes March 17, 2008.Budget Items have been ordered and many received including: new photocopier, 5 Bunker suits,Truck boots (4 pair) Defibs, 16 flashlights.2 fingertip oxymeters, 16 SCBA masks, SBCA inservice in truck 290, Harry to go with Bill D. to get upright compressor for North Hall.

NEW BUSINESSPit Passes plastic clips break easily, would like to replace with metal clips, Jim to price athardware store.

COMMITTEE REPORTSTRAINING -Jim Dunk. 101 course April 12, 2008 in Nonvood. Flashover — April 19 & 20,2008, post info at both halls. S0103 Only I showed up of 4, 1 person called in to notif3’. Harry’and Lloyd went to Fire Code training, Jeff Ogden went to SCBA compressor & Air Controlcourse last week. Warkworth Arena will be having Livestock Rescue/one day course April 16,2008. Cobourg TAPP-C V2 day April 19, 2008, Baltimore WTfl Awareness !.4 day May 10,2008.SOC’s - Jeff Ogden. —Not AvailableFIRE PREVENTION/ EDUCATION - Lloyd Hutchinson. — Committee met to discuss Springdoor-to-door Smoke Alarm Program.. County meeting they mentioned that there have been toomany fatal fires and more awareness is needed.

OPEN AGENDANil

IN CAMERA SESSION*Motion by Lloyd Hutchinson to go in camera to discuss personnel concerns second by BrianeRyckman. Carried* Motion by Lloyd Hutchinson to come out of camera second by Bill Dingman. Cathed

NEXT MEETING Tuesday April 1,2008 at 6:30 p.m. South Hall

ADJOURNMENT Motion to adjourn by Bill Dingman. Carried.


Additions to the 2007 Annual Report

Ministry of Transportation Calls (Highway 401)

Total MVA or Vehicle Fire Calls for 2007 = 34

Total Invoiced Calls Paid = 11 - Total revenue $11,375.00Total Wages for these calls = $5760.00 V

tNOTE: a total of 23 calls not chargeable according to MTOGuidelines

fi’e Total Wages paid for these 23 calls = $8977.50 V

In Addition 11 calls were dispatched and cancelled on route or noemergency was found

Total Wages for these calls = $4770.00 NGrand Total of Wages is $13,747.50 q

N

C\ 601 - (OCD’

Jn C—°.‘

çA0

MU

NIC

IPA

LIT

YO

FB

RIG

HT

ON

.B

UIL

DIN

GPE

RM

ITR

EC

OR

D20

08

DA

TE

PE

RM

IT#

AP

PL

ICA

NT

LO

CA

TIO

NU

SE

IZE

ES

TIM

AT

ED

lE

OE

(jE

i)O

bT

$)

.-

,.t

...,

TO

TA

LA

SO

FP

RE

VIO

US

_PE

RIO

D.

2D

U$

682,

000

FE

BR

UA

RY

1/F

eb2008-0

8R

icha

rdT

op22

Tim

ber

Rid

geD

r.R

enov

atio

n(f

inis

hbs

mt)

.$

15,0

00.0

0R

oger

McM

urra

y36

Mea

deSt

.(2

007-

170)

Plu

mbi

ngP

erm

iton

ly5/

Feb

2008-0

9Q

uint

eF

amil

yE

yeC

are

Clin

ic46

Prin

ceE

dwar

dSt

.,U

niI#

10C

omm

erci

alR

enov

atio

n10

,000

.00

7/F

eb2008-1

0Y

van

Ro

y37M

eadëS

L.

Ren

ovat

ion

——

__

_

22/F

eb20

08-1

1Ir

ene

Vai

deli

s15

909

dy

Rd.

29D

emol

itIo

n.$

5,00

9.00

22

/Feb

2008-1

2R

owle

yE

lect

rjc

Ltd

.-

:5C

raig

Blv

d‘I

ndus

tria

l(w

ind

turb

ine)

.$

15,0

00.0

025/F

eb-2008-1

3R

ayV

oska

mp

Con

stru

ctio

n8

Dee

rfie

ldD

r.(L

ot25

)S

ingl

eU

nIt’

Dw

eIlin

g1,

755

$2

26

,00

0.0

025/F

eb2008-1

4M

urra

yG

ordo

n—

30Sh

ewm

anR

dD

eck

$—

3,00

0.00

26/F

eb2008-1

5—

Fham

Har

rald

38say

LW

Gar

age

744

$1500000

,T

otal

Sq.

Ft.

2,49

9T

OT

AL

FO

RP

ER

IOD

1DU

$-

TO

TA

LY

EA

RT

OD

AT

E-

UãT

OüW

..

TO

TA

LP

RE

VIO

US

YE

AR

TO

DA

TE

.S

DU

$1,

461,

000.

00

‘-4 CD (I

D

rj C C

BY-LAW ENFORCfljNT REPORT - FEBRUAJflJ 2008

By-law Enforcement

Re: Summary of Complaints & Investigations (Feb. V’, 2008, to Feb. 29” 2008 mcI.)

The following will provide you with a detailed breakdown of complaints and investigations. Most

complaints were resolved by oral communication, and no follow up letter was sent. Where it was

deemed necessary (possible continuance of the issue leading to the complaint) letters were sent.

Letters:

False Alarms 7

Correspondence 7

Property Standards 1

Zoning 3

Dog Control 1

Summary of Enforcement: Complaint Patrol and Follow-up

-

Received Observation

Dog related Issues 1 2 41

Property Standards Issues 1 1 57

Parking Cautions 0 2 N/A

Parking Issues 1 1 16

ParkingTags 0 1 0

Garbage/Dumping 0 0 7

Signs 0 1 19

Park Issues 2 0 Daily Patrol *

Miscellaneous 1 7

Zoning 1 1 18

FalseAlarms 1 0 1

Snow Removal Issues 5 1 14

Delinquent Water Bills 41 0 0

Research and Reports 2 1 3

,

Ron GrnmethBy-Law Enforcement Officer

REPORT

TO: Committee of the Whole

FROM: Ken Hufford, Director of Planning a& Development Sen’ices

RE: Proposed Bell Mobility Cellular Communication TowerPart of Lot 34, Concession 5, Municipality of Brighton370 Old Wooler Road

Date: March 5, 2008

Introduction

Bell Mobility has recently contacted Municipal Staff regarding their desire to construct a new cellularcommunications tower in Part of Lot 34, Concession 5. The Municipal street address is 370 Old WoolerRoad. A location map as well as a ‘small’ copy of the site plan is attached.

The tower proposed by Bell Mobility is a 106.0 metre (348 feet) guyed tower. In addition to the tower,an eighteen square metre (192 square foot) equipment shelter is also proposed.-

Industry Canada, the federal regulatory body has recently (January 1, 200$) put in place new guidelineand procedures that indicate that local land use planning authorities can establish a “telecommunicationsprotocol” to set out local requirements for such things as public notice and public meetings.

The last cellular tower erected in Brighton was by Eell Mobility along Stony Point Road South. BellMobility actually hosted a public open house at Timber House as pan of the process. I understand thatthis was done oluntariIy by Bell Mobility.

Under the new (January 1, 2008) procedures it seems that Bell Mobility does not need to hold an openhouse and in fact I get the impression that unless Brighton has a “protocol” in place requiring it, they willnot hold an open house or public meeting. Staff have prepared a preliminary or interim Protocol that theMunicipality may wish to pat in place to least provide

Curently Brighton has fees in place for tower construction as follows:

Communication Tower Site Plan Agreement $1,275.00 plus $1,000.00 deposit

Transmission Tower Construction Permit Fee $11.00 per vertical foot

Recommendation

It is recommended that Committee recommend to Council:

1. That the attached “Antenna Sitting Protocol” be adopted on an interim basis until a more detailedanalysis of the Industry Canada guidelines and regulations can be dompleted.

1

LOCATION MAP

PROPOSED BELL MOBILITY CELLULAR TOWER

PART OF LOT 34, CONCESSION 5370 OLD WOOLER ROAD

PROPERTY ROLL # 1408 206 050 32500

N

S

IvrQ

;ftA

PF

ITC

PL

’NO

FC

UR

SE

rC

IIC

LAY

OIS

TL

IESI

CS

Or

roo

00

0to

laC

ER

FIR

IraU

TF

arI

PAR

TO

FLO

T34

CO

NC

ESS

ION

5E

tjN

ICP

AJf

lO

FO

RIG

HTO

IC

OU

HW

OF

NO

RTH

UM

OER

LAN

D

MEI

TUC

CLC

V*t

;CU

NIT

C

LIT

CU)

1ct,

Itr

,,C

Si&

iL’ç

SU

IJC

CI

r,,

L-rr

rT*T

1)t

ftO

.PC

tAC

O-i

ftM

‘CC

34

I

III

II I

__J

Li

-J

CC

AC

CS

OfT

”€

S

Sti

r!C

AN

.rC

Ii—

TC

S!

F

*,

AQ

ICA

ft0

f45

,U!I

EiN

mi

tOft

aU

aN

!A

5.4

)4—

---__

:.:r

II

——

Iii’

/4

Iit

/IU

.-4

ICIO

UL

C

--

I 7

CITE

DuN

rtr,

.nuN

rua

C)

½ C,

C,

N— CO —l

3E I.;

I,

I:::

flI

3D

’32

tfiI

•!•

TIC

•N

A I.C

CA’

CC

55

/

?R40r3

‘5

•t’r

3-J

Municipality of Brighton Antenna Siting Protocol March, 2008

Objective

The Council of the Municipality of Brighton believes that where antenna systems andtowers are proposed within the boundaries of the Municipality it is important thatadjacent and neighbouring property owners be made aware of the proposal and that anopportunity is available for the public to express their concerns, questions and interest.

The Council also believes that the proponent of the antenna system or tower should -demonstrate to the Council and the public the appropriateness of the proposed location;the need for additional antenna systems or towers; that a review of the possible impactsof the development on the natural environment has been undertaken; and that co-locationon existing towers has been considered and why this is-not feasible.

Jurisdiction

The Council of the Municipality of Brighton has adopted an Official Plan pursuant tosection 160) of the Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990, as amended. The Planning Act providesthat an official plan “shall contain goals, objectives and policies established primarily tomanage and direct physical change and the effects on the social, economic and naturalenvironment of the municipality”. Therefore the Municipality has a clear interest in anyproposals for the siting of antenna systems and towers.

Submissions by the Proponent

The proponent shall submit to the Municipality studies and reports to demonstrate:

• That it has considered the appropriateness of the proposed location;• The need for additional antenna systems and towers;

-

• That the proponent has consulted with the Consen’aflon Authority to detennine ifthere are natural heritage features or natural hazards that may be impacted by theproposed antenna system and tower;

a That co-location on existing towers owned by the proponent and other towerowners has been considered and why this is not feasible.

Public Consultation

The proponent shall deposit with the Municipality at least two mounted display boardsized site plans of the proposed antenna system and tower location including an elevationplan of the tower and associated buildings and structures. The site plans will be availableat the Municipal Office for public review.

The proponent shall provide written notice to all landowners located within a minimumdistance of three times the height of the proposal tower measured from the boundary of

7

the property on which the tower is proposed to be located. Such written notice shall

include notice of a public open house to be hosted by the proponent.

Where the height of the proposed tower exceeds 30 metres, the proponent shall place a

notice in a local cornimmity newspaper having general distribution in the area of the

proposed tower. Such notice shall include notice of a public open house to be hosted by

the proponent.

The proponent shall hold a public open house within the Municipality and if at all

possible, in the general area of the proposed tower.

Time Frames

The public open house shall be held no earlier than 30 days after the written notice and

newspaper notice have been given regarding the proposed tower.

The mounted site plans will be provided to the Municipality at least 30 days prior to the

public open house.

The proponent shall provide the Municipality with copies of any correspondence received

prior to and at the public open house and a summary of comments submitted at the public

open house within two weeks of the public open house.

The Municipality shall provide its comments to the proponent and Industry Canada

within 30 days of the receipt of the public comments from the public open house.

Site Plan Approval Process

The Municipality of Brighton requires that the proponent apply for and enter into a site

plan agreement with the Municipality if the antenna system and tower is to be

constructed. -

The Municipal Tariff of Fees and Charges By-law requires that the proponent pay the

appropriate site plan application fee (current 200$ fee: $1,275 plus a 1,000 deposit).


appropriate construction permit fee (current 2008 fee: $11.00 per vertical foot for the

tower as well as the applicable fee for related buildings and structures).

The Municipality ofBrightonMzinictpal Office. 35 Alice Street

P.O. Box 129Brighton, Ontario

KOK IHOTelephone (613) 475-0670 Fax (613) 475-3453

Press ReleaseHerrington announces new ChiefAdministrative Officer for BrightonMarch 10, 2008For immediate release

Mayor Chris Herrington today announced the appointment ofGayle Frost as the new Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) forthe Municipality of Brighton. Ms. Frost will join Brighton onApril 21, 2008. “We are delighted that we have someone withGayle Frost’s knowledge and experience joining our team. Hermunicipal background and her expertise in long-term financialand strategic planning will serve us well as she providesleadership for our superb and dedicated staff.” Said MayorHerrington.

Ms. Frost currently holds the position of Commissioner ofCorporate Services and Finance for the County of Prince Edwardwhere she is responsible for the offices of Clerk and Treasurer.Ms. Frost said: “Brighton is truly a great community, and Iappreciate the opportunity and am looking forward to workingwith my new Council and staff team. I am very pleased thatmy 20 years of municipal experience will be of service to thepeople of Brighton”

LOCATION MAP

PROPOSED BELL MOBILITY CELLULAR TOWER

PART OF LOT 34, CONCESSION 5370 OLD WOOLER ROAD

PROPERTY ROLL # 1408 206 050 32500

N

E

S

KEY

PU

J4

Yor

ocY

Arp

fFc

rflnj

CF

sIJ

n(y

flID

lTE

IAC

DU

TO

EC

ICI

Ft

F’C

itO

law

PAR

TO

FLO

T34

CO

NC

ES

SIO

N5

MU

NIC

;p,tI

NO

F8f

lBH

tO’J

COU

NTY

OF

NO

OT!

JUM

BER

LcID

“fl

it

ttrV

wY

flJ

NIl

E

tEtC

hY

:uui.

tyoiF

gcfl

Tlr

iFrE

JL

st

-—

---—

—t

lIflf

lflt

fl

SU

YJF

CT

PIO

FE

RF

Crt

M

P41

Wi

:114

rnl.

ll.r

rft

fP

lYN

EC

n.w

ui:

SA

M1

1 IFR

YPO

FI4

CO

1APO

WC

LAY

OU

Tn

AIl

IIi

I

IIP

I‘T

iMJl

fl

___J

Li.

—J

NV

TU

II

/E

ni1

’t

tIlE

till

-

zttr

tLfl

fl.—

.P.

414

SE

lIP

HM

iKA

YL

ull

En

IF

‘Lip

jA•l

w_

ILs,3

N.---

-J

Municipality of Brighton Antenna Siting Protocol March, 2008

Objective

Th Council of the Municipality of Brighton believes that where antenna systems andtowers are proposed within the boundaries of the Municipality it is important thatadjacent and neighbouring property owners be made aware of the proposal and that anopportunity is available for the public to express their concerns, questions and interest.

The Council also believes that the proponent of the antenna system or tower shoulddemonstrate to the Council and the public the appropriateness of the proposed location;the need for additional antenna systems or towers; that a review of the possible impactsof the development on the natural environment has been undertaken; and that co-locationon existing towers has been considered and why this is not feasible.

Jurisdiction

The Council of the Municipality of Brighton has adopted an Official Plan pursuant tosection 160) of the Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990, as amended. The Planning Act providesthat an official plan “shall contain goals, objectives and policies established primarily tomanage and direct physical change and the effects on the social, economic and naturalenvironment of the municipality”. Therefore the Municipality has a clear interest in anyproposals for the siting of antenna systems and towers.

-

Submissions by the Proponent

The proponent shall submit to the Municipality studies and reports to demonstrate:

• That it has considered the appropriateness of the proposed location;• The need for additional antenna systems and towers;• That the proponent has consulted with the Consen’ation Authority to determine if

there are natural heritage features or natural hazards that may be impacted by theproposed antenna system and tower;

• That co-location on existing towers owned by the proponent and other towerowners has been considered and why this is not feasible.

Public Consultation

The proponent shall deposit with the Municipality at least two mounted display boardsized site plans of the proposed antenna system and tower location including an elevationplan of the tower and associated buildings and structures. The site plans will be availableat the Municipal Office for public review.

The proponent shall provide written notice to all landowners located within a minimumdistance of three times the height of the proposal tower measured from the boundary of

7

the property on which the tower is proposed to be located. Such written notice shall

thclude notice of a public open house to be hosted by the proponent.

Where the height of the proposed tower exceeds 30 metres, the proponent shall place a

notice in a local community newspaper having general distribution in the area of the

proposed tower. Such notice shall include notice of a public open house to be hosted by

the proponent.

The proponent shall hold a public open house within the Municipality and if at all

possible, in the general area of the proposed tower.

Time Frames

The public open house shall be held no earlier than 30 days after the written notice and

newspaper notice have been given regarding the proposed tower.

The mounted site plans will be provided to the Municipality at least 30 days prior to the

public open house.

The proponent shall provide the Municipality with copies of any correspondence received

prior to and at the public open house and a summary of comments submitted at the public

open house within two weeks of the public open house.

The Municipality shall provide its comments to the proponent and Industry Canada

within 30 days of the receipt of the public comments from the public open house.

Site Plan Approval Process

The Municipality of Brighton requires that the proponent apply for and enter into a site

plan agreement with the Municipality if the antenna system and tower is to be

constructed. -


appropriate site plan application fee (current 2008 fee: SI,275 plus a 1,000 deposit).


appropriate construction permit fee (current 2008 fee: $11.00 per vertical foot for the

tower as well as the applicable fee for related buildings and structures).

The Municipality ofBrighton$ •Mnnicial Office. 35 Alice Street

P.O. Box 189Brighton, Ontario

KOKIHOTelephone (613) 475-0670Fax (613) 475-3453

Press ReleaseHerrington announces new ChiefAdministrative Officer for BrightonMarch 10, 2008For immediate release

Mayor Chris Herrington today announced the appointment ofGayle Frost as the new Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) forthe Municipality of Brighton. Ms. Frost will join Brighton onApril 21, 2008. “We are delighted that we have someone withGayle Frost’s knowledge and experience joining our team. Hermunicipal background and her expertise in long-term financialand strategic planning will serve us well as she providesleadership for our superb and dedicated staff” Said MayorHerrington.

Ms. Frost currently holds the position of Commissioner ofCorporate Services and Finance for the County of Prince Edwardwhere she is responsible for the offices of Clerk and Treasurer.Ms. Frost said: “Brighton is truly a great community, and Iappreciate the opportunity and am looking forward to workingwith my new Council and staff team. I am very pleased thatmy 20 years of municipal experience will be of service to thepeople of Brighton”

I

I%

H

UH

i:H2

F

S

]%4.unicI

tyof

Brighton2007 ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

ON DRINKING WATER QUALITY

Certificate of Approval No. 5482-6FJKQHWatenvorks Identification No. 220000807

t1

Municipality of Brighton 2007 Annual Report on Drinking Water Quality

2007 ANNUAL SUMMARY REPORT FOR COUNCIL

INDEX

Brighton’s Municipal Drinking Water System1.1 Raw Water Source’ä1.2 Treatmeht Process13 Distribution System1.4 Consumption and Charges to Consumers1.5 Water Pressure Zones of Brighton Distribution System

2. Drinking Water Systems Regulations2.1 The Safe Drinking Water Act, 20022.2 The Drinking-Water Protection Regulation (0. Req. 170/03)2.3 Sustainable Water and Sewage Systems Act, 20022.4 Definitions

3 Requirements of the Drinking-Water System Regulation3.1 Sample & Test3.2 Use an Accredited Laboratoiy3.3 Report Adverse Results3.4 Control Documents3.5 Municipal Non-residential compliance3.6 Certified Operators3.7 Prepare an Annual Report3.8 Prepare Annual Summaiy Report for municipal council

4 Upgrades to the Drinking-Water System

5 Small Municipal Non-Residential Systems5.1 Codrthgton Community Centre Well Supply5.2 Hilton Hall Well Supply

6. Conclusion

APPENDICESAppendix 1 - Brighton Water Supply System —2007 Monthly SummaryAppendix 2— Part ifi Drinking-Water Systems Regulation O.Reg.170/03

— Annual Report to MOEAppendix 3 — Part RI Codrington Community Centre Well Supply Annual ReportAppendix 4— Pan III Hilton Hall Well Supply Annual Report

1


2007 ANNUAL SUMMARY REPORT FOR COUNCIL

Summary Reports for Municipalities, Schedule 22 of O.Reg. 170/03, has been prepared to

assist Brighton’s Municipal Council in understanding the capability and operation of the

drinking-water system and the quality of its water.

The report summarizes:1. Brighton’s Large Municipal Residential Drinking-Water System

2. Ontario Drinking-Water Systems Regulations3. Requirements of the Regulations and System’s Approvals

4. Upgrades Required to Correct Deficiencies

5. Brighton’s Small Municipal Non-Residential Systems

5.1 Codrinston Community Centre Well Supply

5.2 Hilton Hall Well Supply

1. BRIGHTON’S MUNICIPAL DRINKING WATER SYSTEM

1.1 Raw Water Source

In 2007, water sources at the Brighton Well Supply consisted of three drilled wells. The only

raw water source is groundwater which is captured from a deep aquifer by drilled wells

located adjacent to the old Upper Reservoir site. There are three wells that draw water from

the aquifer under the reservoir area: Well Nos. 1, 2 and 3 pumps work on rotation

As part of Brighton’s Turbidity Report-Action Plan and Implementation Schedule, mitigation

measures included, pumping to waste until turbidity levels were below 1.0 NTU. As of

October 14th 2005, water was supplied to the new storage and treatment facility by the three

groundwater wells.

The Brighton Well Supply plant has been fortunate in having an excellent source of natural

spring water as its main source of water supply. However all existing and future potable

water storage structures must be completely covered to prevent contamination of stored

water. The transition to a secure groundwater supply to meet O.Reg.170/03 and the

Procedure for Disinfection of Drinking Water in Ontario included construction of the third

well and a new storage facility. A fail safe control system has been installed to ensure that an

upward hydraulic gradient is maintained at all times in the raw water supply aquifer. This

system includes water level sensors in each observation and production well, an alarm system

equipped with pre-detemrined set-points for well depth, and a SCADA data-log system. The

work was completed and commissioned in October. 2005.


1.2 Treatment Process

Disinfection of water to eliminate disease-causing organisms is the most important step in thewater treatment process. In October 2005 our upgraded system came on-line which changedour system from an open surface water reservoir system to an enclosed concrete storagereservoir. This enables us to have more contact time for chlorination, this is done by injectingChlorine gas into the water as ft enters into one of two cells (which is called FreChlorination). The concrete water storage reservoir is approximately 39 rn x 58 m, andconsists of two cells. Each cell is equipped with baffles and provides 2800 m3 x 2 = 5600 m3of water storage and equipped with overflow, drain system, piping and appurtenances, and awater main from the Water Treatment Plant (WTP) and reservoir to the existing distributionsystem (DS). A WTP building approximately 39 m x 10 m housing a primary and secondarydisinfection system consisting of two (2) gas chlorinators, weigh scales, vacuum regulators,injectors and appurtenances to facilitate application of chlorine solution for pre-chiorinanon ata point where water enters either cell from the wells and also post-chlorination as water entersthe DS. Instrumentation and controls including on-line chlorine residual analyzer andturbidity meters measure the chlorine residuals arid turbidity in the reservoirs and the outlet tothe DS. Emergency power is provided by a 15 KW standby power generator and a 80 KWtrailer mounted standby generator including manually operated transfer switch. There is adrain/bypass line from the WTP and reservoirs to outfall through a bypass detention pond.

1.3 Distribution System

The Municipality of Brighton’s distribution system provides drinking water to approximately6070 residents through a network of approximately 57 lan. of piping and 2,510 residential and170 commercial accounts. Fire hydrants are maintained by the Water Department, whichincludes a flushing program to clean the mains and flush out dead-ends. This practicemaintains the water quality in the distribution system and ensures the hydrants are in goodrepair. Chlorine residuals, as well as microbiological sampling and testing, in the distributionsystem are checked on a weekly basis. At least seven separate sites. Operators also testchlorine residuals on a daily basis in the distribution system as per 0. Reg. 170/03.

Upgrades to the distribution system in 2007 included replacement of 6”cast water main with6” PVC main on Division St. from Park St. to Chapel Street and including all householdservices and fire hydrants. The same was also done on Lakeview Heights from Hope St, andon Dorman St. from Kingsley St. to Young St. including all household services and firehydrants. There was also an extension to Perry St. of approximately 200 feet, includingservices and hydrant. On Division St. South a new fire hydrant was installed at the dead endintersection with Lyon St. for flushing and fire protection. There were also extensions to thedistribution system on Algonquin Avenue Roos Subdivision), Beacon Drive (Harbour PointSubdivision) and Empire Boulevard (Stahvood Homes Subdivision).

3


In 200?, there were 27 water leaks in the distribution system. Most of the water leaks (25)

were the cause of worn flared connection fittings and worn copper services lines. There were

2 main line breaks in 2007. Also, there were 8 hydrant leaks.

1.4 Consumption and Water Rates

Increases in monthly flows in the past years are directly associated with weather patterns

where warmer temperatures and decreased precipitation are associated with higher daily flow

demands by consumers. In 2007, a total of 968,818 m3 of water was used. Therefore, based

on a population of 6070 residents on the distribution system, the per capita for water

consumption was 159.6 m3/ personiyear or 0.437 in3 (437 Litres)/personlday. Based on 2007

consumption, the average daily demand was 2,654 m3/day, the average daily demand

represents the average quantity of water treated at the water treatment plant. Peak day demand

represents the highest volume of water treated over a given 24-hour period, usually the hottest

day of the year but it could also include fire suppression usage. This occurred on June 28th,

2007 at 4,490 m3/day.

In 2007, the Bulk Water Facility was utilized by eight bulk water supply contractors as well as

sales at the A’Iunicipal Public Water Dispenser for a total of 77 m3.

By-law Number 274-2004 enacts the rules and regulations for the installation, repair,

maintenance, and access to the Water Distribution System and appurtenant water meters,

sanitary and storm sewer services and related appurtenances; the billing and collection of

charges for water and sewer usage; and the penalties for offences of the water and sewer

works in the Municipality of Brighton.

As part of the Municipality of Brighton’s water conservation policy, the Water Conservation By

law No. 029-2001, is enforced annually from June l to September 15th• This by-law is

maintained to regulate and restrict the unnecessary use of water for outdoor purposes within the

serviced area. Staff monitor and enforce compliance to this by-law during the period that it is in

effect.

4


Table I

WATER CONSUMPTION I FLOWS (m3)MONTH YEAR

: 2001 2002 1 2003 2004 1 2005 2006 2007January 76,773 69,912 [ 78,265 71,970 70,952 [ 82,272 58,718February 63,693 62,483 70,877 68,580 71,484 69,405 56,628March 77,381 68,314 75,369 79,259 69,759 76,039 63,579April 73,377 67,718 70,619 72,723 61,223 F 72,884 65,329May 115,800 69,653 80,476 79,911 69,198 86,572 89,653June 89,667 79,769 86,909 89,335 89,504 89,064 105,967July 114,793 111,753 98,759 87,648 91,527 85,591 99,390August 115,775 106,421 1 96,356 86,528 89,244 93,161 107,735September 88,386 95,634 90,002 78,125 82,643 68,548 96,781October 78,357 73,716 75,261 76,815 81,680 65,398 79,923November 73,073 75,738 I 72,510 74,115 80,713 63,636 70,758December 73,704 83,509 70,377 72,995 79,890 I 59,960 74,357Total Flow 1,040,779 964,620 965,781 938,004 937,827 911,530 968,818Monthly Avg. 86,732 80,385 80,482 77,908 78,152 F 75,961 80,735Monthly Max. 115,800 111,753 98,759 89,335 91,527 93,161 107,735Monthly Mm. 63,693 62,483 70,377 68,580 61,223 59,960 56,628

YEAR 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007Annu avg. daily 2,851 2,643 1 2,645 2,562 2,545 2,495 2,654Max.daily 4,787 4,958 1 4,656 3,733 4,087 4,087 4,490flow m3/day IRated 6,445 6,445 6,445 6,445 6,445 6,445 6,445capacity

74%%max.day

rated capacity% annual avgdaily flow m3/day

77% 72% 58%

44%

63%

41%

63%

41%

69%

40% 39% 39% 41%

2’


Water Use Summary for 2007

Water produced at the Water Treatment Plant 968,818 m3

Amount of water used by Customers 734,966 m3

Amount of water used for Hydrant flushing 4,398 m3

Amount of water sold at Bulk Water and Public Dispensing Station 77 m3

Estimated amount of water used for flushing and swabbing of new watermains 345 m’

Estimated amount of water used by Fire Department for practices and fires 165 m3

Estimated amount of water unbilled due to defective meters 21,378 m3

27 Water Service Leaks at an estimated 4,475 m3 per leak 120,000 m3

S Hydrant leaks at an estimated 4,475 in2 per leak 35,800 m’

Total amount of water unaccounted for in 2007 51,689 m3

Therefore approximately 5.3% of the total water supply remained unaccounted for in 2007.

Waste per quartet at 60 psi water pressure

L4later costs nioney.. Diameter of stream Galtons cubic Feet cubic Melers

don’t waste it! 1,181,500 158,000 4475

A d,ipping faucet or fixture can waste 3 gallons aday.a total of 1095 gallons a year 666,000 89,031 2,521

Conserve Water and Save Money!,

1

A reminder troth your local water utility where1% 296000 39,400 1,1 5

were dedicated to quality and service. ‘ 74,000 9,850 280

A e.7I2 Ital t-r, a oat wi fi’ c*. Oror a Lint ,,,,a gend. w,iIa aim in fl iffl2tAS 302,0

6


2. Ontario Drinking Water-Systems Regulations

2.1 THE SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT, 2002

The purpose of the Act is to gather in one place all legislation and regulations relatin to thetreatment and distribution of drinking water, to protect human health through the control andregulation of drinking water systems and drinking water testing. The new’ Drhildng WaterSystems Regulation arid its supporting regulations can be found at www.ene.2ov.on.ca. TheSafe Drinking Water Act will be incorporating a statutory standard of care, whereby everydirector and officer of a corporation (including municipal councillors) that owns a municipaldrinking water system has a duty to take all reasonable steps to prevent any user of the systemfrom being exposed to an unreasonable health risk that may arise from their consumption ofdrinking water. With this, municipal officials are expected to be informed of their drinkingwater system and acquainted with drinking-water legislation and regulations.

On May 14, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment filed a new certification regulation foroperators of municipal and regulated non-municipal drinking water systems, titled O.Reg.128/04 CerrUlcation of Drinking- Water System Operators and Water Qualm’ Analysts underthe Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002: This new regulation ensures tougher certification andtraining rules for water system operators based of the classification of the MunicipalResidential System. This regulation explains operating standards for Municipal ResidentialSubsystems and Limited Subsystems that are to be followed and maintained by the owner oroperating authority of the subsystem including record-keeping re: operation of the subsystem,operation and maintenance manuals, operator training, and duties of the operator-in-charge.

2.2 THE DRINKING WATER PROTECTION REGULATION (O.Reg.170/03)

Effective June 1, 2003, the Drinking Water Protection Regulation (O.Reg. 170/03) replacedthe Drinking Water Protection Regulation for larger Watenvorks (O.Reg. 459/00).Regulation 170/03 sets water treatment standards for a variety of water systems and includes anumber of supporting regulations, including the Drinking Water Quality Standards Regulation(O.Reg. 169/03) which prescribes standards for 161 physical/chemical, microbiological andradiological parameters.

2.3 SUSTAINABLE WATER AND SEWAGE SYSTEMS ACt 2002

This Act ensures clean, safe drinking water for Ontario residents by making it mandatory formunicipalities to assess and cost-recover the Ml amount of water and sewer services. A reportto the Ministry on the Ml cost of water and wastewater sen’ices is to include a cost recoveryplan for operating costs, source protection costs, financing costs, renewal and replacementcosts and improvement costs associated with treating and distributing water to the public.

7


2.4 DEFINITiONS

Accredited Lab, all laboratories that test drinking water must be accredited for the tests they

perform by the Standards Council of Canada or its equivalent. Accreditation involves

performance testing and auditing to ensure that laboratories follow appropriate procedures

using acceptable methods.

Chlorine Residual — chlorine residual in water is a component of chlorine after the initial

disinfection or chlorine demand has been satisfied. The maintenance of a chlorine residual in

the distribution system is intended to keep a persistent disinfectant residual to protect the

water from microbiological re-contamination and serve as an indicator of distribution system

intenty.

GUDI Groundwater Tinder Direct influence of Surface Water — in some groundwater

supplies, situations may exist where contaminants typically found on the ground or in surface

water, such as a lake or river, find their way into the groundwater and can be pumped from

the well into the water distribution system. Such a system is referred to as Groundwater

Under Direct Influence of Surface Water or GUDI. This can be caused by a number of

different factors including the geology surrounding a well, insufficient travel time behveen the

well intake and surface water or a defect in the well. A true groundwater supply would

normally be free of harmful microbiological contaminants and reflect only disinfection be

provided as a minimum level of treatment along with a minimum chlorine residual after 15

minutes contact lime.

i’LkC Iviaximum Acceptable concentration — This is a health-related Ontario drinking water

standard established for contaminants that have Imown or suspected adverse health effects

when above a certain concentration. The length of time the IvLAC can be exceeded without

injury to health will depend of the nature and concentration of the parameter.

IMAC Interim Maximum Acceptable Concentration — This is a health related Ontario

drinking water standard established for contaminants when there are insufficient toxicological

data to establish a MAC with reasonable certainty, or when it is not practical to establish a

?L4C at the desired level.

Inorganic parameters — substances such as salts and metals, which can be naturally

occurring or result from urban storm water runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater

discharges, oil and gas production mining, farming, or domestic plumbing.

OG Operational Guidelines are established for parameters that need to be controlled to

ensure efficient and effective treatment and distribution of water.

mgIL milligrams per litre is a measure of concentration of a parameter in water, sometimes

called parts per million (ppm).

8


jaglL micrograms per litre is a measure of concentration of a parameter in water, sometimescalled pans per billion (ppb).

Parameter is a substance that is sampled and analyzed in the water.

Potable Water is water from ground or surface sources that is supplied for humanconsumption.

Raw Water — water entering the treatment plant prior to any chemical addition. Raw watersampling and analysis provides a measure of source water quality which allows assessmentand adjustment of treatment process; information on the source of any contaminants; and longterm trends in source water quality.

Total Trihalomethanes (THM) — are the most widely occurring synthetic organics found inchlorinated drinking water. The principal source of Irthalomethanes is the action of chlorinewith naturally occurring organics (material that comes from plant or animal sources). Themaximum acceptable concentration for TEM is 0.10 mg/L based on four quarter movingannual average test results, tested at a remote point site in the distribution system.

Turbidity — turbidity in water is caused by the presence of suspended matter such as clay, siltand microscopic organisms and is commonly present in the source water as a result of soilrunoff The substances and particles that cause turbidity can be responsible for interferencewith disinfection, can be a source of disease-causing organisms, and can shield pathogenicorganisms from the disinfection process.

Treated Vater is source water that has been altered in order to disinfect and ensure treatmenthas producing water of equal or better quality.

3 Requirements of the Drinking-Water System Regulation

3.1 Sample & Test drinking water in a frequency designed to reflect the type and user ofthe system. Specific re4uirements for each category differ depending on the size andpopulation served.

> Cateorv of System - Brighton Well Supply is categorized as Large MunicipalResidential, which is defined as a municipal drinking water system that serves a majorresidential development of more than 100 private residences.

> Sampling & Testing requirements for a Large Municipal Residential drinking watersystem state that the owner of the drinking-water system and the operating authority forthe system shall ensure samples be tested for the following:

Microbiological — O.Reg. 170/03 Schedule 10 requires at least eight distributionsamples, plus one additional distribution sample for every 1,000 people served by thesystem, are taken every month, with at least one of the samples being taken each week.With this, 13 treated distribution samples would be required monthly. Brighton currentlysamples at least 7 distribution samples weekly or approximately 2S samples monthly, andI treated water sample weekly. These samples are tested for Escherichia coli or fecalcoliforms and total colifonns, and 25% of the samples are tested for general bacteria

9


populations expressed as background colony counts on the total coliform membrane filter

or as colony counts on a heterotrophic plate count. Raw water samples are required to be

tested at least once every week from the drinking-water system’s raw water before any

treatment is applied to the water. Raw water was sampled weekly frQm Well #1, Well #2

and Well #3.

Table 2-Microbiological Sampling & Testing-Laige Mu,, tcipal Residential

Source Jan. j. Mar. Apr. I Ma, Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct Nov. Dec. Total

iWelI#1 s[ 4 541

5 45 4 45 44 53

Well#2 sI 4 5 i 5 4_ 4 4_j 41 531

Wpll#351 4 5 4 5 4 15 4 41 53

L]taI Raw Samples 15 12 15 12 15 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 j 159

rTreated WaterPOE (Point of Entry)

Oistribuüon System

5

40

45

4

Total Treated SampJes

32

36

51 4

401 32

45 36

5

401 32

45 36

4 5

40

45

4

32

36

Microbiological Number Range of Range of Total Number of Range of

Results of Samples E.Coli Results Coliform HPC Samples HPC

I Results Results

Raw I 159 <1-238 c1->400 159

Treated Water 53 Absent I Absent 53 <10-20POE-Chlorine Station I

Distribution 477 <1 <1 105 <10-40

• Chemical Sampling & Testing — O.Reg. 170/03 Schedule 13 requires Large Municipal

Residential Systems be tested for the following:

(i) Thorganics (Schedule 23) be tested at least every 12 months if the system

obtains water from a raw water supply that is surface water. Note that once the

water system switches to groundwater (wells) then sampling for organic!

inorganic parameters can be reduced to every 36 months.

(ii) Lead - at least one sample in the distribution system is taken every 12 months

from a point in the drinking-water system’s distribution system or in plumbing

that is connected to the dijuiring-water system that is likely to have an elevated

concentration of lead. lit 2007 new Regulations were added to test for Lead

Schedulel5.l-5 starting dates to be started between December 2007 - April

2008.

(iii) Organics — if the system obtains water from a raw water supply that is surface

water, at least one water sample is taken ever 12 months. When the raw water

source is oundwater (wells) then at least one water sample must be taken

every 36 months.

32

4: 51 I sI 53

42440 L 3?

36

32

45 36 36 477

I0


(iv) Trihalomethanes — at least one distribution sample is taken every three monthsfrom a point in the drinking-water system that is likely to have an elevatedpotential for the formation of Trihalomethanes.

(v) Nitrate and Nitrite, one water sample taken every three months.(vi) Sodium, one water sample taken every 60 months.(vii) Fluoride, one water sample taken every’ 60 months.

See Appendix I — Part III Form 2 for Brighton’s Annual Report electronic submission toMOE; there were no exceedanees of organic or inorganic parameters tested during Uris period.

3.1 Use an Accredited Laboratory

Drinking-water systems must use a licensed laboratory as outlined in die Drinking WaterTesting Services Regulation (O.Reg.248/03) which became law in June 2003.> Laboratory Services Notification Forms O.Reg. 170/03 were completed and submitted to

the Ministry of Environment. Confirmation that Caduceon Laboratories in Kingston,Nepean, and Ottawa as well as Lakefield Research are listed with The Standards Councilof Canada as an accredited lab was made. Notifications were sent to the labs to ensureclear and complete notification is reported when adverse water quality incidents may bereported.

3.2 Report adverse test results

Any test result that exceeds any of the standards in Schedules 1, 2, 3 (other than fluoride) inthe Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards (O.Reg.l69/03) verbally and in writing to boththe local Medical Officer of Health and the Ministry of the Environment.

> On March 7th, 2007 the lab notified us of a P/A (present/absent) Total Coliforms, aresample was done and came back negative for Total Coliforms.

3.3 Obtain a Certificate of Approval and a Permit To Take Water for a municipalresidential drinking-water system from the ministry.

In the future, approval will be replaced with municipal drinking-water system licenses anddrinking-water works permits. In order to obtain a license, an owner will be required to havean operational plan approved by the ministry, an accredited operating authority, financialplans, a permit to take water and a drinking water works permit.

Brighton Water Lye!! Supply System ‘s Approvals include:

1) Certificate of Approval Number 5482-6FIKQH dated the 25th day of August, 2005amended the previous certificate by extending the completion date to October 3 l,2005, for upades of the drinking-water system to comply with O.Reg. 170/03 and

11


Procedure for Disinfection of Drüfldng Water in Ontario. Commissioning of the new

facility was completed in accordance with the current certificate.

2) Permit to Take Water No. 200 l-62MNU2 was issued to the municipality on September

27, 2004 and authorizes the withdrawal of water from each of the production wells

Nos. 1, 2 and 3 at a maximum rate of 24.9 Us, 1,494 Umin. or 2,151,360 L/day.

Well No. 1 24.9 L/s, 1,494 L/min or 2,151,360 L/day

Well No. 2 24.9 L/s, 1,494 L/min or 2,151,360 L/day

Well No. 3 24.9 L’s, 1,494 L/min or 2,151, 360 Uday

3.4 Have certified operators or trained persons, depending on category of system.

Certzfled Operators hwlude:

Mike Ryckman, Overall Responsible Operator, Supervisor, WDS ifi

Mark Alexander, WDS IIKeith Lee, WDS ISteve Wong, OTT

Operator training requirements, under the new 0. Reg. 128/04 state that the annual

number of hours of training required under Section 29 in each year vi1l be a total of 35

hours of which 12 hours or more are continuing education and the remaining hours as on-

the-job practical training.

3.5 Prepare an annual report in order that the public has access to information

on the status of drinking water.

Annual reports are prepared in accordance with O.Reg. 170/03. Drinking water reports are

available at both municipal offices and the municipal website; the public is informed via

newspaper when it is available. The Annual Report on Drinking Water must be passed by

Resolution of Council.

3.6 Prepare an Annual Summary Report, on municipal residential systems for

municipal Councilors, members of a municipal seMce board, or the board of

directors of municipal business corporations, as appropriate.

This report must include information regarding the requirements of the Act (Section 3.1 of

this report), the regulations (Section 2), the System’s approval (Section 3.4) and any order

that the system failed to meet during the period of the report noting the duration of the

failure and the measures taken to correct the failure. The report must also include flow

rates of the water supplied during the period including monthly average, maximum daily

flows, and the rated capacity for the purpose of assessing the capability of the system

(Table 1), and daily instantaneous peak flow rates (Appendix III). The report must include

information for the purpose of enabling the owner of the system to assess the capability of

the system to meet existing and ifinire planned uses of the system.

12


4 Upgrades to the Drinking-Water System to Correct Deficiencies.

No upgrades were needed to the Brighton Well Supply or Treatment Plant Facility to maintaincompliance with the regulations and standards set forth by the Ministry of the EnvironmenL

5 Small Municipal Non-Residential Systems

Community centers such as Codrington Community Centre and Hilton Hall are categorized asSmall Municipal Non-Residential which is defined as a municipal drinking water system thatdoes not serve a residential development, is not capable of supplying drinking water at a rateof more than 2.9 litres per second, and serves a desianated facility or public facility.

On June Yd, 2005, O,zrario Regnation 252/05 replaced 170/03 for Small Municipal NonResidential systems, which includes rural community halls such as Codrington CommunityCentre and Hilton Hall. The new regulation reduces the fmancial burden on owners butmaintains a high level of public health protection. Only microbiological sampling of F. coiland total coliforms is required. Installation of treatment equipment is no longer required andannual reporting is no longer required.

5.1 Codrington Community Centre Well SupplyMicrobiological sampling is being done Bi-weekly at the CodHngton CommunityCentre.No adverse sample were recorded at this site in 2007.

5.2 Hilton Hall Well Supply

Hilton Hall has U’! disinfection and filtration, microbiological sampling wasperformed on a Bi-weekly basis.

1. February 2l, 200?, a background count of 6 Total Coliforms was reported, theMOE limit is 0. MOWSpills ActionJMOE were all notified of the report, the UVsystem and filter were replaced, flushing and resampled ; the test came back clear.

6 Conclusion

In 2007, the Brighton Well Supply and Distribution System achieved ff11 compliance with ourCertificate of Approval and Ontario Regulation 170/03.

The Brighton Water Department is proud of its water quality and is committed to providingthe safe and reliable water supply.

13


Appendix 1 - 2007 Monthly Summary

14


Appendix 2

Drinking-System Regulations O.Reg. 170103

Part III Form 2

Drinking-Water System Number:Drinking-Water System Name:Drinking-Water System Owner:Drinking-Water System Categon’:Period being reported:

Municipal Offices:35 Mice St., Brighton67 Sharp Rd. Brighton

I I

Note: For the following tables below, additional rows or columns may be added or anappendix may he attached to the report

List all Drinking-Water Systems (if any), which receive all of their drinking water fromyour system:Presqu’ile Provincial Park- Parks Ontario

Did you provide a copy of your annual report to all Drinking-Water System owners thatare connected to you and to whom you provide all of its drinking water?Yes [x j No []

220000807Brighton \Vell SupplyCorporation of the Municipality of BrightonLarge Municipal ResidentialJanuary 1-December 31, 2007

Complete ilvour C’ategorv is Large MunicipalResidential or Small Municipal Residential

Does your Drinking-Water System serve morethan 10,000 people? Yes [1 No [x]

Complete for all other Categories.

Is your annual report available to the public at

Yes [x Ino charge on a web site on the Internet?

Number of Designated Facilities served:

No[]Location where Summaryunder 0. Reg. 170/03available for inspection.

Report required

Did you provide a copy of your annual reportto all Designated Facilities you serve?Yes[ I No[i

Schedule 22 will be Number of Interested Authorities you reportto:I I

Did you provide a copy of your annual reportto all Interested Authorities you report to foreach Designated Facility?Yes[ ] No[ ]

15


Indicate how you notified system users that your annual report is available, and is free of

charge.[x I Public access/notice via the web

[x j Public access/notice via Government Office

[x j Public access/notice via a newspaper -

[x J Public access/notice via Public Request

Public access/notice via a Public Library

Public access/notice via other method

Describe your Drinking-Water System

In 2007, water sources at the Brighton Well Supply consisted of three drilled wells. The only

raw water source is groundwater which is captured from a deep aquifer by drilled wells

located adjacent to the old Upper Reservoir site. There are three wells that draw water from

the aquifer under the reservoir area: Well Nos. 1, 2 and 3 pumps work on rotation. A fail safe

control system has been installed to ensure that an upward hydraulic gradient is maintained at

all times in the raw water supply aquifer. This system includes water level sensors in each

observation and production well, an alarm system equipped with pre-determined set-points

for well depth, and a SCADA data-log system. The work ;vas completed and commissioned

in October, 2005.

Disinfection of water to eliminate disease-causing organisms is the most important step in the

water treatment process. ifi October 2005 our upgraded system came on-line which changed

our system from an open surface water reservoir system to an enclosed concrete storage

reservoir. This enables us to have more contact time for chlorination, this is done by injecting

Chlorine gas into the water as it enters into one of two cells (which is called Pit-

Chlorination). The concrete water storage reservoir is approximately 39 m x 5$ in, and

consists of hvo cells. Each cell is equipped with baffles and provides 2800 m3 x 2 = 5600 m3

of water storage and equipped with overflow, drain system, piping and appurtenances. and a

water main from the Water Treatment Plant (WTP) and reservoir to the existing distribution

system (DS). A WTP building approximately 39 m x 10 m housing a primary and secondary

disinfection system consisting of two (2) gas chlohnators, weigh scales, vacuum regulators,

injectors and appurtenances to facilitate application of chlorine solution for pre-chlorination at

a point where water enters either cell from the wells and also post-chlorination as water enters

the DS. Instrumentation and controls including on-line chlorine residual analyzer and

turbidity meters measure the chlorine residuals and turbidity in the reservoirs and the outlet to

the DS. Emergency power is provided by a 15 KW standby power generator and a 80 KW

trailer mounted standby generator including manually operated transfer switch. There is a

drain/bypass line from the WTP and reservoirs to outfall through a bypass detention pond.

The Brighton Well Supply is Classified as Water Distribution and Supply Class fit.

List all water treatment chemicals used over this reporting period

________________________

F Chlorine Gas

16


Were any significant expenses incurred to?Install required equipment

I Repair required equipment] Replace required equipment

I DescribeNew storage reservoir completed. in service as of October 14, 2005

Provide details on the notices submitted in accordance with subsection 18(1) of the SafeDrinking-Water Act or section 16-4 of Schedule 16 of O.Reg.170/03 and reported toSpills Action Centre

Incident Date Parameter Result Unit of - Corrective Action CorrectiveMeasure - Action Date

March 7th, P/A (present/absent) I cc Resample and retest March 8th2007 Total Coliforms

Microbiological testing done under the Schedule 10, 11 or 12 of Regulation 170/03,during this reporting period.

Number Range of E.Coli Range of Total Number Range of HPCof Or Fecal Coliform Results of HPC ResultsSamples Results (mm #)-(max #) Samples (mm #)-(max #)

(mth #)-(max #)

Raw 159 <1 - 200 <1->400 159 <10-20Treated 53 absent <1 -1 53 <10-20Distribution 424 <1 1 <1 105 <10-40

Operational testing done under Schedule 7, 8 or 9 of Regulation 170/03 during the periodcovered by this Annual Report.

Number of Range of ResultsGrab (mm #)-(max #)

. SamplesTurbidity 8760 0.06-2.00 nm’sChlorine 8760 0.38-2.05 mg/LFluoride (If theDWS providesfluoridation)

NOTE: For continuousmonitors use 8760 as thenumber of samples.

iVOTE: Record the un it of measure if it is not milligrams per litre.

Summary of additional testing and sampling carried out in accordance with therequirement of an approval, order or other legal instrument.

17

Municipality of Brighton 2007 Annual Report on Drinking Waler Quality

sample results.No Sampling in 2007

Parameter Sample Date Result Value Unit of Measure Exceedance

Arsenic Dec 13/05 <0.001 m&L No

Barium Dec 13/05 0.002 mulL No

Boron Dec 13/05 0.075 mgI!. No

Cadmium Dec 13/05 0.006 thWL f No

.Dec 13/05 <0.0001 ] mulL No

Chromium

Nov 15/07 0.00002 Mu/L No

Lead

Mercu’ Dec 13105 <0.00006 mg’L No

Selenium Dcc 13/05 <0.001 mg/!. No

Sodium jpv 13/07 J0.0006 j mulL No

Uranium Nov 13/07 0.1 malL No

Fluoride Nov 13/07 <0.1 mgI!. No

Nithte Nov 13107 3.2 mu/L No

Nitrate No” 13/07 <0.00006 mulL [No

Summary of Organic parameters sampled during this reporting period or the most recent

sample results Not Sampled in 2007Parameter Result

Sample Value Unit of ExceedanceDale Measure

Alachlor Dec 13/05 <0.3 hulL no

Aldicarb Dec 13/05 <3 g/L no

.AIdHn + Dieldnn J Dec 13/05 [<0.02 I no

Atrazine - metobolites Dec 13/05 <0.5 4u/L no

.Azinphos-methvl Dec 13/05 <1 ftalL no

Bendiocarb Dec 13/05 <3 ig/L no

enzene Dec 13/05 <0.5 gjL no

Denzo(a)pyrene Dec 13/05 <0.005 no

I Bromoxvnil Dcc 13/05 <0.3 halL no

‘ Carbaryl Dec 13/05 <3 igJL no

Carbofuran Dec 13/05 <1 JcrfL no

Carbon Tetrachiobde Dec 13/05 <0.2 .tg/L no

Ch]ordane (Total) Dec 13/05 <0.04 lulL no

Chlorpwifos Dec 13/05 <0.5 n’L no

£vanazine Dec 13/05 <0.5 1/L no

Diazmon Dec 13/05 <I jjgIL no

Dicamba Dec 13/05 <5 J_gg/L no

I 2-Dichlorobenzene Dec 1 3/05 <0. I helL

l,4-Dichtorobenzene Dec 13/05 <0.2 no

IDichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DOT) Dec 13/05 <0.1 iig/L no

j meiaboli’es

18

Summary of Inorganic parameters tested during this reporting period or the most recent


1,2-Dichloroethane Dec 13/05 <0.1 no1,l-Dichloroethylene Dec [3/05 <0.1 gg/L no(vinylidene chloride)Dichloromethane Dec 13/05 <0.3 no24 Dichlorophenol Dec 13/05 <0.1 jagfL no2,4-Dichiorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D) Dec 13/05 <5 pg/L noDiclofop-methyl Dec 13/05 <0.5 pig/I.. — noDimethoate 1 Dec 13/05 <1 ug/L noDinoseb Dec 13/05 <0.52 pig/I.. noDiquat Dec 13/05 <5 pig/L noDiuron Dec 13/05 <5 pieIL noGlyphosate

- Dec 13/05 <25 noHeptachlor + Heptachlor Epoxide Dec 13/05 <0.1 pig/L noLinadane (Total) . Dec 13/05 <0.! ggJL noMalathion Dec 13/05 <5 ggJL — noMethoxychlor Dec 13/05 <0.1 gg/L . noMetolachlor Dec 13/05 <3 t.tg/L noMeuibuñn

. I Dec 13105 <3 pig/I. noMonochlorobenzene Dec 13/05 <0.2 noParaquat Dec 13/05 <I pig/L noParathion Dec 13/05 <3 palL noPentachlorophenol Dcc 13/05 <0.! pig/L noPhorate Dec 13/05 <0.3 pig/L noPicloram Dec 13/05 <5 pig/I.. noPolychlodnated Biphenyls(PCB) Dec 13/05 <0.05 -pig/I. noPromethyne Dec 13/05 <0.1 pig/L noSimazine Dec 13/05 <0.5 pig/L noTHM Nov 16/07 <0.3 pig/I. no(NOTE: show latest quarterly average-lOS)Avg.11.2Sodium Nov 20/07 4.9 mWL noNitrate+Nithte Nov 15/07 3.2 mg/L noBromochloromethauc

. Nov 16/07 <0.1 pig/L noTemephos . Dec 13/05 <10 pigl noTerbufos - Dec 13/05 <0.4 pigJL noTernchloroethylene .

. Dec 13/05 <0.2 pig/L no2,3,4,6-Tetrachloropbenol Dec 13/05 <0.! pig/L noTnallate Dec 13/05 <10 palL noThchloroethylene

- Dec 13/05 <0.1 -paiL no2,4,6-Tnchlorophenol . Dec 13/05 <0.1 pig/L no2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxv acetic acid (2,4,5-T) Dec 13/05 <10 galL noTr[fluralln Dec 13/05 <0.5 galL noVinyl Chloride Dcc 13/05 <0.2 ga/L noToluene-dS (SS Nov 16/07 105 % noChloroform Nov 16/07 <0.3 pig/L noTemephos Dec 13/05 <10 pig/I.. noDibromochloromethane-d4,1,2-(SS) Nov 16/07 <0.1 pg/L noBromoform Nov 16/07 <0.1 palL noBromofluorobenzene.4(SS) Dec 13/05 101 no

List any Inorganic or Organic parameter(s) that exceeded halfiii Schedule 2 of Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards.

the standard prescribed

Parameter Result Value- Unit of Measure Date of Sample

19


I I

Appendix 3

Drinking-Water SystemDrinking-Water SystemDrinking-Water SystemDrinking-Water SystemPeriod being reported:

Number:Name:Owner:Category:

Complete if your Category is Lare A’hmicipalResidential or Sniall Municipal Residential

Complete for all other Categories.

Does your Drinking-Water System sene morethan 10,000 people? Yes [j No [J

Is your annual report available to the public atno charge on a web site on the Internet?Yes [1 No []

Location where Report required under

0. Reg. 170/03 Schedule 22 will be available

for inspection.

HDid you provide a copy of your annual report

to all Designated Facilities you serve?

Yes [] No [1

Number of Interested Authorities you report

to:o

Did you provide a copy of your annual report

to all Interested Authorities you report to for

each Designated Facility?Yes[j No[]

List Drinking-Water Systems, which receive all of their drinking water from your system:

Did you provide a copy of your annual report to all Drinking-Water System owners that

are connected to you and to whom you provide all of its drinking water?

Yes[ jNo[ }

Drinking-System Regulations

Part III Form 2Section 11. ANNUAL REPORT.

O.Reg. 170/03

250033813Codrington Community Centre Well Supply

The Corporation of the Municipality of Brighton

Small Municipal Non Residential

I January 1-December31, 2007


20


Indicate how you notified system users that your annual report is available, and is free ofcharge.[X] Public access/notice via the web[X j Public access/notice via Government Office[X] Public access/notice via a newspaper

Public access/notice via Public RequestPublic access/notice via a Public LibraryPublic access/notice via other method

Describe your Drinking-Water SystemOne Well supplies water to community centre, no treatment


None

Were any significant expenses incurred to?Install required equipmentRepair required equipmentReplace required equipment

2 Describe

Provide details on the notices submitted in accordance with subsection 18(1) of the Safe

Number Range of Range of - Number Range of I-WCof EColi or Fecal Total of HPC ResultsSamples Results Coliform Samples (Th#)

(#-#) Results

Drinking-Water Act or section 16-4 of Schedule 16 of O.Reg.170/03 and reported toSpills Action Centre?

Microbiological testing done under section 8 (2) during this reporting period

21


Raw 25 <1 <1

Treated

Distribution

Operational testing done under Schedule 7. 8 or 9 during the period covered by this

_Turbidity

_Chlorine

• Fluoride (If theOWS provides

, fluoridation)

I NOTE: Record the unit of measure if it is not milligrams per litre.

Summary of additional testing and sampling carried out in accordance with the

I I Result

3 Paramete 4 Sample Value S Unit of 6 Exceedan

r Date Measure ce

5.1 Antimo

‘ Arsenic

_BariumBoron

[ Cadmium

5.1 Chromhim

[ 5.1 LeadLjcj.cury

I_SeleniumUranium IFluoride

Nitrite

Annual Report.Number ofGrabSamples

Range of Resultsf-u -u“n-It


Summary of Inorganic parameters tested during Uris reporting period or most recent

-fl


Nitrate I I

Summary of Organic parameters sampled during this reporting neriod or most recentParameter

Samp!e Date Result Value Unit of Exceedance- Measure

Alachior

Aldicarb

Aithin + Dieldrin

Atazthe + N-dealkylated metobolites

Azinphos-metbyl

Bendiocarb

Benzene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Brornoxynil

Carbaryl

Carbofluran

Carbon Tetracliloride

Chiordane (Total)

Clilorpyrifos

Cvanazthe

Diazüuon

Dicamba

l,2-Dichlorobenzene

I ,4-Dichlorebenzene

Dichlorodiphenylthcffloroethane (DDT) ±

metabolitesI ,2-Dichloroethane

1,1-Dicliloroethylene(vinylidene chloride)Dichioromethane

2-4 DicHorophenol

2,4-Diclilorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D)

Diclofop-methyl

Dimethoate

Dinoseb

Diquat

Diuron

Glyphosate

Heptaclilor ÷ HeptacHor Epoxide

Linadane (Total)

23


Malathion

Methoxychior

Metolachior

Methbuzin

MonocLilorobenzene

Paraquat

Parathion

Pentachiorophenol

Phorate

Picloram

Polychlodnated Biphenvls(PCB)

Prometrvne

Simazine

Tifivi(NOTE: show latest quarterly average)

Temephos

Terbufos

Tetrachloroethylene

2,3,4,6-Tetracifiorophenol

Tñallate

Trichloroethylene

2,4,6-THcfflorophenol

2,4 ,5-Thchlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4,5-

T)Trifluralin I I______________

• Vinyl Chloride I______________

List any Inorganic or Organic parameter(s) that exceeded half the standard prescribed

in Schedule 2 of Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards.Parameter Result Value Unit of Measure ) Date of Sample

(Only if category is lar2e municipal residential, small municipal residential, large municipal non residential, small

municipal non residential, large non municipal non residenciab

71


Appendix 4

Drinking-System Regulations O.Reg.Part III Form 2Section 11. ANNUAL REPORT.

170103

Drinking-Water System Number:Drinking-Water System Name:Drinking-Water System Owner:Drinking-Water System Category:Period being reported:

Municipality of BrightonSmall Municipal none ResidentialJanauryl/05- December 31/07

H

Note: For the following tables below, additional rows or columns may be added or an{ppendix may be attached to the report

List all Drinking-Water Systems (if any), which receive all of their drinking water from yoursystem.

Drinking Water System Name Drinking Water System Number

260033800Hilton Hall

Complete if your Category is Large MunicipalResidential or Small Municipal Residential

than 10,000 people?Does your Drinking-Water System serve more

Complete for all other Categoriei

Yes [1 No [1

Is your annual report available to the public at

Yes [] No [1no charge on a web site on the Intemet?


Location where Summaryunder 0. Reg. 170/03

Did you provide a copy of your annual report

available for inspection.

Report required

to all Designated Facilities you serve?Yes [1 No [1

Schedule 22 will beNumber of Interested Authorities you reportto:0

Did you provide a copy of your annual reportto all Interested Authorities you report to foreach Designated Facility?Yes[] No[]

25


Did you provide a copy of your annual report to all Drinking-Water System owners that are

connected to you and to whom you provide all of its drinking water?

Yes [1 No [

Indicate how you notified system users that your am-iual report is available, and is free of

charge.

x j Public accessmnotice via the web

[xj Public access/notice via Government Office

[x} Public access/notice via a newspaper

[ ] Public access/notice via Public Request

Public access/notice via a Public Library

] Public access/notice via other method

_____________________________________

Describe your Drinking-Water System

One well supplies water to Hall, inline filter and UV for disinfection.


None

Were any significant expenses incurred to?

Install required equipment

Repair required equipmentReplace required equipment

7 Please provide a brief description and a breakdown ofmonetary expenses incurred

Provide details on the notices submitted in accordance with subsection 18(j) of the Safe

Drinking-Water Act or section 16-4 of Schedule 16 of O.Reg.170/03 and reported to

Spills Action Centre

Incident Date Parameter Result Unit of Corrective Action Corrective

: Measure Action Date

ebrua 2 /07 Backeround ij5i00mLr iat

February 22/07

,

-flushed and resample

26


I I

Microbiological testing done under the Schedule 10, 11 or 12 of Regulation 170/03,during this reporting period.

Number Range of E.Coli Range of Total Number Range of KPCof Or Fetal Coilform Results of HPC ResuLtsSamples Results (mm #)-(max # Samples (mm #)-(max #)

(mm #)-(max #)

Treated 24 <1 <1-6ets/lOOmI

Operational testing done under Schedule 7, 8 or 9 of Regulation 170/03 during the periodcovered by this Annual Report.

Number of Range of ResultsGrab (ruin )-(max #)Samples

Turbidity

Chlorine

Fluoride (If theDWS providesfluoridation)


NOTE: Record the unit of measure if it is not milligrams per litre.

Summary of additional testing and sampling carried out in accordance with therequirement of an approval, order or other legal instrument.

Date of legal instrument Parameter Date Sampled Result Unit of Measureissued

Summary of Inorganic parameters tested during this reporting period or the most recentsample results

Parameter Sample Date Tatsult Value Unit of Measure ceedance

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

BoronCadmium

27


Ch rom urn

Lead

Mercury

Selenium

Sodium F

Uranium

Fluoride

Nithte f DecIJ/05 <0.1 mg/I noNiate Dec 13/05 0.8 mg/I no

Summary of Organic parameters sampled

sample resultsduring this reporting period or the most recent

Parametersample Result Value Unit of Exceedance

Date Measure

Alachior

Aldicarb

Aldrin - Dicithmn

_Atrazine ± N-dealkvlated metobolites

Aziaphos-metbyl

Bendiocarb

Benzene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Bromoxynil

Carbaryl

Carbothran

Carbon Tenacliloride

Chiordane (Total)

Chiorpyrifos

_CyanazineDiazinon

Dicamba

1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene

1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene

Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) ±

metabolitesI ,2-Dichloroethane

1, t-Dicliloroethylene(vinvhdene_chloride)Dicliloromethane

2-4 Dichlorophenol

t 2.4-Dichiorophenoxy aceüc acid (2,4-D)

Diclofop-methyl

‘Dünethoate

28

I— -


Dinoseb

Diquat

Diuron

Glvphosate

HeptaclUor ± Heptachior EpoxideLindane (Total)

Malathion

Methoxychlor

fvletolachlor

[_Methbuzinr1onocorobeurene

Paraquat

Parathion

PenmcNorophenol

Phorate- -

Picloram- -

-

Polychiorinated Hiphenyls(PCB)Prometrvne

S inuzine

THM(NOTE: show latest annual average)Temephos

Terbufos

Tetnchioroethylene2,3,4,6-TetracifiorophenolTriallate

Trichloroethylene2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4,5-T)Thfluralth

Vinyl Chloride

List any Inorganic or Organic parameter(s) that exceeded halfin Schedule 2 of Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards.

Parameter Result Value of Measure Date of Sample

(Only if DWS categoiy is large municipal residential, small municipal residential, large municipalnon residentiaL non municipal year round residential, large non municipal non residential)

the standard prescribed

29


3

Municipality of Brighton WPCP Annual Report 2007

MlslththPai1P1 of

tonWASTEWATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT

ANNUAL REPORT

2007MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT - CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL NUMBER 3-0521-00-006

SEWAGE WORKS NUMBER I 1000095J

Municipality elBrighton WPCP Annual Report 2007

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

> Classification and Control Document Informatiom

2.0 CONTACT INFORMATION

> OwnerOperator contact information

3.0 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT & TREATMENT PROCESS

4.0 CO?vWLLANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

4.1 PERFORMANCE4.1.1 Wastewater flows to the WPCP4.1.2 Waste Stabilization Pond Effluent Quality

4.1.3. Waste Stabilization Pond Loading

4.1.3 Wetland Effluent Quality

4.2 MONITORING AND RECORDING> Table Vifi — Compliance to sampling frequency

> Table V— Waste Stabilization Pond — weekly lab results

> Table VI—Wetland Final Effluent — weekly lab results

> Table VII- Lagoon Loading- from weekly lab results

> Table IX- X - Brighton WPCP Performance

4.3 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE> Summar of Operations> Summary of Maintenance> Summary of Envfronmental or Operating Problems

4.4 REPORTING

5.0 CONCLUSION


1.0 INTRODUCTION

The Municipality of Brighton is pleased to present its Annual Performance Report for wastewatertreatment for the operating period of January Ito December 31, 2007.

Brighton’s Water PollutiOn Control Plant services a population of approximately 6,070 consistingof 2,510 residential and 170 commercial accounts. The Ontario Environmental TrainingConsortium Certification Office (OETC) classifies the Water Pollution Control Plant asWastewater Treatment Class 1 facility and Wastewater Collection Class 2 collection system.

-

The Brighton Wastewater Pollution Control Plant operates under Certificate of Approval number3-0521-99-006 issued by the Ministry of Environment.

CONTROL DOCUMENT INFORMATION

Effluent EffluentType of Control Number Issue Date Monitoring Reporting

Document Requirements Requirements(Yes/No) (Yes/No)

C of A 3-0521-99-006 7/09/99 YES YESSewage Works

C of A Sludge 3-0381-96-006 8/01/96 N/A N/ADrying Beds

CofA A710120 2/05/97 N/A N/AComposting Site

There were no biosolids pumped to the drying beds during this reporting period and no materialwas utilized or removed from the compostihg site.

7

Municipality of Brighton wpcp Annual Report 2007

2.0 CONTACT INFORJW4TION

For information or questions regarding this report please contact:

The Corporation of the Municipality of Brighton

35 Mice Street, P.O. Box 189

Brighton, ON K0K 1HOTelephone: (613) 475-0670

Fax: (613) 475-3453

Jim Phillips, P.Eng., Director

Public Works & Environmental Services

67 Sharp RoadMunicipality of BrightonTelephone: (613) 475-1162

Fax: (613) 475-2599

Brighton WPCP Operators: Wawie Pearson, WWT VWWC II. Operator-in-Charge

Brighton WPCP & Public Works Urban Road Foreman

Telephone: (613) 475-0666

Fax: (613) 475-2599

Keith Lee, WDSV WWTIIWWC II Operator


Telephone: (613) 475-1 162

Scott Hodgson, OIT Operator


Telephone: (613) 475-1162

Consultant: John Pries. C.E.T.CH2M HILL Canada Ltd.

180 King St. S., Suite 600

Waterloo, ON., N2J 1PS

Telephone: (519) 579-3500

Accredited Laboratory: Caduceon Environmental Laboratories

285 Dalton Ave., Kingston, ON K7M 6Z1

Phone: (613) 544-2001

Fax: (613) 544-2770

3

Municipality of flrighton WFCP Annual Report 2007

3.0 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT DESCRIPTION & TREATMENT PROCESS

The sewage works in Brighton consists of:

> a 0.7 hectare aerated lagoon (lagoon #1) with two mechanical surface aerators. The effluentfrom the aeration lagoon passes through a chemical mixing chamber where alum is addedbefore entering the waste stabilization pond; -

a 5.44 hectare waste stabilization pond (lagoon #2) is a facultative lagoon where wastewaterstabilization is carried out by a combination of aerobic, anaerobic and facultative bacteria.a constructed wetland having a surface area of 6.2 hectare, located south of the existing wastestabilization pond consisting of Wetland Cell #1 (north cell) and Wetland Cell #2 (soitth cell)with alternating deep zones and vegetative terraces. The effluent from the constructedwetlands is continuous and discharges to a natural wetland that borders Presqu’ile Bay locatedoff the northeast shore of Lake Ontario;

> a 2-cell drying bed to service the existing sewage treatment lagoons; sludge that accumulates inthe lagoons may be periodically pumped to drying beds.

The hydraulic capacity of the sewage works was re-rated to 4,600 m3/day when the constructedwetland was incorporated to the treatment system in the summer of 2000. Approximately 35% ofthe sanitary sewage from the Brighton collection system flows by gravity to the aerated lagoon; theremainder of the flow (65%) was collected at the Harbour Street Sewage Pumping Station where itis pumped through a forcemath to the WPCP. The pumping station is equipped with three dry wellcenthfligal pumps that pump wastewater through a forcemain to the aerated lagoon. A standbydiesel generator is on-site (replaced in September of 2005) at the pumping station to provideelectricity to the pumps during power outage events.

Brighton’s wastewater treatment system is a simple low-tech approach based on purifying thewastewater through biological activity in a lagoon-based system. Raw wastewater enters theaerated lagoon (lagoon #1) where it is mixed and oxygenated. The added oxygen from aerationallows aerobic microorganisms to reduce organic matter and nutrients, and reduces odour potentialin the wastewater. The effluent from the aerated lagoon then passes through a mixing chamberwhere Alum (Aluminum Sulfate) is added. Mum is a flocculent used in wastewater ponds toprecipitate soluble phosphorus and aids in the settling of many other substances. The effluent thenflows to the waste stabilization pond (lagoon #2) where the bound solids settle to the bottom andthe organic portions are decomposed though microbial action. Dissolved materials such as nitrogenand phosphorous are used by green algae in the pond for cell growth. The effluent from the wastestabilization pond then enters the constructed wetland for final polishing where the water is furtherfiltered and cleansed. The natural processes occurring in the lagoons and wetland system producea good quality effluent that is monitored regularly by licensed operators. Treatment performancefrom lagoon-based systems is susceptible to low temperature conditions and associated negativeeffects on biological treatment performance. Ammonia removal rates and microbial growthtypically decrease with lower temperatures. The Certificate of Approval provides changes inconcentration limits for Ammonia in the waste stabilization pond and constructed wetlands fromOctober to April to provide allowances for cold temperatures that result in lower nitrification rates.

Analyses are taken in both the influent (raw sewage) and the effluent at the lagoon and wetlands todetermine the amount of treatment achieved. The results must comply with MOE guidelines andCertificate of Approval effluent concentration limits and objectives.

4


4.0 COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONEITIONS OF CERTifICATE OF

APPROVAL

4.1 Performance

4.1.1 Wastewater Flow to the !VPC’P

CerqJicate ofApproval 2.(a) The Owner shall ensure that the flow of sewage into the sewage

treatment works does not exceed the average daily flow of 4,600 m3/day for a period of any twelve

(12) consecutive calendar months.

The average daily flow for 2007 was 3,108 m3lday, which represents 67.6% of the average day

design capacity of 4,600 m3/day. The maximum annual daily flow for 2007 occurred on April 17,

2007 where heavy precipitation contributed to a peak flow of 7,653 m3/day. Peak monthly flow of

14S,787 m3 occurred in April due to precipitation that month. Annual flow of sewage to the WPCP

was 1,135,399 in 2007 with approximately 56% of the wastewater entered via the pumping station

and 44% flowing by gravity from the remainder of the sanitary collection system.

Table I — Monthly Sewage In-flow to Treatment Plant

Date Total Flow m3 Av. Flow Max. Day Flow % (Avg.Day/Designm /Day m3 Capacity)

JAN j 140,264 4525 7166 98%

FEB 78,345 2798 3306 60%

MAR 120,276 3880 6381 I 84%

APR 148,787 I 4960 7653 E 108%

MAY 1 113,879 3674 6592 80%

JUN 84,874 2829 3370 62%

JUL 78,451 2531 3313 55%

AUG 72,287 2332 2650 51%

SEP 67372 2246 2763 49%

OCT 70,893 2287 2650 50%

NOV 73,350 2445 2966 53%

DEC 1 86,621 2794 5682 61%

ANNUAL 1 1,135,399 3108 4541 68%

Volume of influent of wastewater to lagoon #2 measured 1,135,399 m3 See Table H.

Average per capita daily wastewater flow from Brighton WWTP was approximately 0.51

m3/capita in 2007, which includes domestic, industrial and commercial contributions as xvell as

infiltration and inflow. (Based on a population of 6,070 and an average daily flow of 3,108

m3!day.)


The total flow of wastewater to the treatment plant in 2006 was 1,388,797 m3, flows in 2007 wereapproximately 8% less due to decreased precipitation throughout the year

Table II- Annual Flows to the WPCP

Date 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003JAN 140,264 135,919 120,016 99,348 72,557FEB 78,345 116,375 91,820 72,900 68,753MAR 120,276 108,727 93,266 139,521 121,860APR 148,787 123,600 137,108 137,429 120,487MAY 113,879 107,899 90,800 107,407 125,924JUN 84,874 92,457 70,223 91,458 100,143JUL 78,451 96,755 68,654 99,697 74,838AUG 72,287 78,674 60,800 113,708 71,274SEP 67,372 85,449 76,665 110,785 68,544OCT 70,893 145,412 89,040 80,535 81,242NOV 73,350 143,914 102,228 90,949 109,618DEC 86,621 153,616 103,019 149,474 123,796

ANNUAL 1,135,399 1,388,797 1,103,699 1,293,211 1,1 39,036

4.1.2 Waste Stabilization Pond Effluent Quality

cei-qficate ofApproval 2.(b) The owner shall design, construct andlor operate the sewagetreatment works such that the concentrations of the materials named below as effluent parametersare not exceeded in the effluent from the waste stabilization pond:

Table III — C of A Waste Stabilization Pond Effluent Parameters

Effluent Parameters

Total Phosphorus

Concentration in Effluent

1.0 mg/L

Loading in Effluent

4.6 kg./day

CBOD5 30.0 mg/L 138.0 kg./daySuspended Solids 40.0 mg!L 184.0 kg./dayAmmonia & Ammonium Nitrogen(May 1 to Oct. 30)’ 14.0 ing/L1 64.4 kg./day’(Nov. 1 to Apr. 30)2 17.0 mg/L2 78.2 kg/day2

6


Waste Stabilization Pond Effluent Summary:

> The Biological Oxygen Demand is the amount of oxygen used by micro-organisms as they

decompose organic matter in the effluent sample for five days. High BOD in effluent means alarge quantity of oxygen was needed to break down the organic matter and identifies a largeamount of organic matter in the effluent indicating inadequate treatment. The CBOD5 averageconcentration from the waste stabilization pond effluent in 2007 was 4.92mg/L; the C of Alimit is 30.0 mg/L CBOD5 based on the average concentration of all samples taken.

> Total Suspended Solids in effluent are composed of settleable solids and nonsettleable solids

depending on the size, shape and weight of the solid particles; large sized particles tend tosettle more rapidly and are largely removed in the waste stabilization pond. Suspended Solids

concentration limit from the waste stabilization pond effluent is 40.0 mg/L. The annual

average of Total Suspended Solids was 10.45 m/L from the waste stabilization pond.> Total Phosphoms (TP) refers to the amount of phosphorus in a sample. Excess TP stimulates

algae and weed growth that may cause fluctuations in dissolved oxygen in the receiving

waters. Total Phosphorus limits for the waste stabilization pond is based on the monthly

average concentration of the parameter; the C of A limit is 1.0 mg’L TP. Monthly average

concentration of Total Phosphorus in 2007 ranged from 0.07-0.58 mgiL.> C of A limits for Ammonia change from May to October at 14.0 mgIL and Nov.-Apr. at 17.0

mgIL. Non-compliance with respect to concentrations of (Ammonia + Ammonium) Nitrogen

in the effluent is deemed to have occurred when the ‘monthly average’ concentration of the

parameter listed in Table ifi is exceeded in any calendar month. Ammonia concentrations

from May to October ranged from 6.63-12.88 mg/L; and from 7.13-17.83 mgIL in November

to April.

A summary of the Lagoon Loading is provided in Table VU.

A summary of the overall performance of the wastewater system is provided in Table DC

4.1 3 Wetland Effluent Quality

Certificate of Approval 5.(a) the Owner shall use best effort to operate the sewage treatment

works with the objective that the concentrations of the materials named below as effluent

parameters are not exceeded in the effluent from constructed wetland:

Table flY— C of A Constructed Wetland Effluent Objectives

CBOD5 15.0mg/I.

Suspended Solids 15.0 mg/L

Ammonia ± Ammonium Nitrogen

(May 1 to October30)’ 70.0 mg/L

(flovember 1 to April 39)2 15.0mg/i.2

0.80 malL

Constructed Wetland Effluent Parameter Concentration

Total Phosphorus

7

Municipality of Brighton WPCP Aimual Report 2007

Wetland Effluent Summary:

> The average concentration of CBOD5 from the constructed wetland effluent in 2007 was 4.02mgIL; the C of A objective is 15.0 mg/I. CBOD5 based on the average concentration of allsamples taken.

> Suspended Solids concentration limit from the constructed wetland effluent is 15.0 mgJL. Theannual average concentration of Total Suspended Solids was 7.41 mg/L from the constructedwetland based on the average concentration of all samples taken. -

> Total Phosphorus limits for the constructed wetland is based on the monthly averageconcentration of the parameter; the C of A limit is 0.80 mgIL. Monthly average concentrationsof Total Phosphorus in 2007 ranged from 0.08-0.70 mg/L.

> Limits for Ammonia change from May to October at 10.0 mgIL and Nov.-Apr. at 15.0 mg.L.Non-compliance with respect to concentrations of (Ammonia ± Ammonium) Nitrogen in theeffluent is deemed to have occurred when the ‘monthly average’ concentration of theparameter listed in Table IV is exceeded in any calendar month. Ammonia concentrationsfrom May to October ranged from 2.18 — 9.25 mg/L; and from 7.52 — 16.50 mgIL fromNovember to April.

>- There was one exceedance in December 2007 as defined in the Certificate of Approval.Ammonia, one of the parameters with respect to concentration from the constructed wetlandeffluent was noted and since they are only guidelines the level was documented.

> Lack of sunlight, plant production, decreased temperatures and ice cover in winter monthsdirectly affects treatment capability of a natural treatment process by limiting dissolved oxygenconcentrations which may contribute to elevated food to microorganism ratio (F:M) conditions.Algae and plants consume nitrogen and phosphorus in the wastewater; lack of this activity inwinter months limits the reduction of Ammonia and Phosphorus in the final effluent.

Certificate of Approval (5j(b) states that the geometric mean density of E. Coli should notexceed 200 organisms per 100 ml. for any calendar month. E. coli are sampled once a month fromIhe waste stabilization pond basis as per C of A. See Tables Vand fri representing the weekl’ labjesuits of the Waste Stabilization Pond and Wetland Effluent including monthly E. Coli results.E. Coli levels were above 200 organisms per 100 ml on four occasions in the lagoon and fouroccasions in the wetland. See Tables V & VI

4.2 MonitorinE and Recording

Certificate of Approval 4.(a) Annual calibration of flow measuring devices was perfonned onDecember 5, 2007. -

Certificate of Approval 4.(b)(c)(d) — Table Vifi demonstrates compliance with frequency ofsampling of raw sewage, waste stabilization pond effluent and wetland effluent.

8

Municipality of Brighton .XXPCP Annual Report 2007

4.3 Operation and Maintenance

Table VWASTE POND EFPLUFNT-2007 —

DATE b%oo - TSS I P 7 P Ajnmolia Anynonta TRW’ NitnIe NY 41tcnt

SofA mqt 4O,n31. LOm;t j IL*y.OdttA Mtf m mt man. 2XI1Onfmo

COOD results °2 recorded as 1.0 MonthtjAv. lNov.Aprl 17 Awemqe —

2-J 100 2.00 Q - 8.90 11.00 010 1.00 100

fl-clan 2.00 2.00 0.08 870 9.00 010 110

.!$164Jdn 3.00 200 007 6.50 8.00 0.10 1.30

2X3an 2.00 8.00 010 4.40 8.30 0.10 1.40

!303ãn 2.00 12.00 120 9.40 11.0 0.10 Ii

1-. 2.20 4.80 I - 9.5r 0.10 1.18 100

1.rdb 4,00 14.00 ê26 I ¶5.00 1400 0.10 0.30 300

fj4pd 9.00 2,00 010 15.70 16.00 010 0.30

i!J1’èb 10.00 13.00 0.35 17.90 17.00 0.10 0.40

fl2Z3Feb 2.00 20.00 0.80 17.30 19.00 0.10 0.20

: 6.25 1225 —030

W6Mat 14.00 46.00 COOL 19.90 20.00 0.10 020 7300

u4t3r 2.00 62.00 100 20.10 1900 010 0.20

.H204.4& 9.00 3100 010 13.20 12,00 0.10 1.00

2t,Mar 2.00 8.00 020 I 12.90 [ iaoo 0.10 0.90

6.75 3Z00 1535. : USa

. Ai 5.00 12.00 020 I 12.00 j__ 13.00 0.10 0.70 20

. i6Afr 15.00 29.00 020 ‘ 1.20 I 13.00 0.10 0.90

*t7-$r 8.00 flOG 0.63 720 10.00 0.10 1.00

:. .2+Afr 3.00 20.00 080 . 3.00 9.00 010 1.30

. ‘‘.n4...% I I775 .

1125 0.98

15.00 14.00 0.40 4.90 1000 010 0.90 100

fl 10.00 25.00 060 6.60 3.60 10.00 0.60 120

iSMay 7.00 13.00 0.20 7.80 11.00 0.10 0.60

tfl41ay 200 8.00 005 6.30 11.00. 0.40 0.50

S*294&y 4.00 14.00 0.50 7.50 . 12.00 0,20 0.20

‘.. — T60 14.80 —‘

.0.68

‘n 4.00 5.00 0.10 11.90 ¶5.00 0.10 0.10 54

-.jin 9.00 7.00 0.33 14.30 16.00 0.10 0.10

2.00 6.00 0.35 8.10 ¶4.00 0.10 2.60

4.00 4.00 0.22 8.70 00 0.50 0.10

. 475 . ._5.50..:. 330 0.73

3.00 4.00 0.12 12.20 1200 0.10 0.10 1000

200 1200 0.17 11.40 I 16.00 0.10 0.10

100 2.00 033 13.80 14.00 0.20 0.10

100 8.00 13.10 17.00 0.10 0.10

5.00 14.00 OW 2* 13.40 . 11400 0.20 010

280 &00 —-—:4t6fl 010

t 200 7.000.11 5.10 .H .6.00 250 0201 27

4r 6.00 11.00 0.08 .

7.00 . 9.00 0.20 0.10

‘l?AIl 4.00 4.00 0.03 5.30 :Y: 7.00 0.30 0.50

11.00 zoo o.oa .., -9.10 . . 12.00 0.60

575 6.00 .

. 0.301

‘ 200 2.00 0.08 ¶2.00 12.00 0.10 0.20 100

rs 7.00 2.00 007 12.20 13.00 0.10 0.40

200 6.00 01 8.50 11.00 0.20 100

S_ 6.00 7.00 0.02 7.50 iSQ. 0.10 1.10

. .‘ 425 . 425 .flOG GSa.

¶4.00 3.00 0.14 11.20 I 12.00 0.1 0.6 100

100 3 0.10 8.90 10.00 0.10 0.70

200 300 0.09 9.00 16.00 0.10 090

b 8.00 2.00 011 14.00 15.00 0.20 1.20

5 8.00 0.10 11 70 16.00 0.20 1.30

5:20 .. 3.80 .. .T43:sôj. 0.94

200 5.00 0.16 1500 *1:18.00 0.20 0.90 100

200 200 0.01 13 0 .: 16 0.30 090

. 3 2.00 0.21 17.60 . 18.00 0.57 1.33

‘!:3*7;têd 200 6.00 0.18 15:30 .. 1700 0.10 0.90

‘1:’:22& .375u. .014 e.Kiiaz5 .j.j *.

.:‘.:-‘4o 200 5.00 0.16 15.60 ‘e-, 19.00 0.10 1.00 100

‘I10ec 2 2.00 0.14 I 20.30 20 0.10 0.60

IS-Ceo 3.00 I 2.00 ...2iL. I 21.50 i2QLi1i 0.20

9


Table VI

DATE I CBOD5 755 7? 7? Month Arnmonia(N) NN Month ThN MInts Mtrate 0. CcliBOO <2mp& recorded as 1 .0 weekly Avenge Average (N) (N):.r2jan 2.00 3.00 0.12 770 9.00 0.10 1.40 100

ill §i,llán 2.00 3.00 116 TOO 7.00 0,10 1.40.itffJäñ 3.00 2.00 0.08 590 7,00 0.10 1.10*t2y.jhn 2.00 3.00 0.08 6.60 9.00 0.10 1.40

,. 3OJañ 2.00 11.00 1.40 1040 9.40 0.10 0.602 2.20 4.40 t,x5zS .&_ 0.10 118

ZOO 13.00 0.17 13.30 13.00 0.10 0.10 100:I4435 4.00 5.00 0.10

. 13.60 15.00 0.10 0.10:2êflt 6.00 11.00 021 12.90 17.00 0.10 0,20

2.00 10.00 0.30 13.20 14.00 010 0.20...3 3.50 9.75 iTh1lW 1475 0.15

Mr 8.00 16.00 0.50 18.00 18.00 010 0.30 1100ZOO 10.00 1.90 18.50 18.00 0.10 040

2e.M 10.00 38.00 0.30 13.60 13.00 010 010Mài’ 2.00 2.00 0.10 1010 12.00 0.10 0.90

4 5.50 16.50 15.25éAp 200 8.00 0.10 160 8.00 010 1.30 40

-44 600 300 0.10 8.20 13.00 0.10 1.904.00 900 0.50 530 8_au 0.10 1402.00 10.00 040 3.30 6.00 0.10 060

5 3_So 750 8.75.Prit-May 9.00 6900 0.40 200 400 0_la 120 13;WI8-May 4_Do 5.00 0.30 0.50 2.00 0_la 0.60wtts,ia 5.00 6.00 010 0.70 4.00 0.10 0.20&l2ZMay 200 7.00 0.02 2.50 400 020 0.30‘f!9.Miy 2.00 400 0.10 5.20 700 0.10 0.10

6 4.40 1820 0.18 4.20J.tSJ1u1 500 5.00 0,17 8.10 10.00 010 010 45mciun 900 3.00 0.15 11.30 12.00 010 0.1091ilun 2.00 2.00 0.29 ‘ 8.00 14.00 010 0.10$e#Wuii 300 3.00 0.32 6.30 10.00 0.10 110

7 475 3.25 0.23 11501t13tniI 2.00 8.00 0.29 800 8.00 0.10 010 1000WlOJul 200 7.00 0.15 6.60 10.00 010 0.10ltWJtT’Jbl 2.00 200 0.50 990 11.00 0.10 0.10144ii 2.00 7,00 0.36 10.90 13.00 0.10 010

6.00 14.00 0.41 11.00 13.00 0.10 0.10<8 2.80 7.60 .0.34 11.00

iWuä 2.00 2MG 0.43 9.50 .7 10.00 010 0.10mtAh9 6.00 11.00 0.32 4.20 8.00 0.10 a_lafltg zoo 7.00 019 6 ‘tSøL. 7.00 0.10 010

11.00 2.00 0.63 6.40 ‘EN 10.00 0.10 0_la

‘E41g 5.25 5.50 0.39 8.75Bèi 2.00 5.00 0.21 8.20 iW 9.00 0.10 0.10 100IS’41tid 13,00 200 0.26 9.50 flW’ 11.00 0.10 0.10tà4i 4.00 5.00 0.16 8.70 ll.oa 0.10 0.10.tsSe 6.00 6.00 060 10.60

..11.00 0.10 o.ia

‘ 10 6.25 450 0.31i12Ott 1400 8MG 027 9.40 10.00 010 u_la2fOtt 020 500 007 660 700 0.10 0.10

16-Ott 2.00 2.00 002 4.50 11.00 021 0.1023-tcl 800 2.00 0.17 1080 12.00 010 0.1030.001 400 6.00 .l 13.6 — 13.00 0.10 0.10

5.64 460 0.13 ifi_H:lia.so6-Nov 400 400 0.09 1300 14.00 0.10 0.20 100

13-Nov 2.00 2.00 0.04 14.20 14.00 020 0.4026-Nov 2.00 2.00 0.11 14.70 16.00 0.03 130

r,.27-N0v 2.00 2.00 007 16.50 17.00 0.10 0.10. 2.50 2.60 0.08 1525

*4’Dée 200 5.00 DII 15.10 17.00 0.10 0.90l1.Dec 2.00 2.00 0.10 20.00 1900 0.10 050

41&Dc 2.00 200 0.10 17.50

.____

20.00 010 02011V712005 2.00 9.00 O.lO.. 13.40 17.00 0.10 0.40

WETLAND FINAL EFFLUENT

10

Mun

icip

ality

01B

right

onS

ewag

eT

reat

men

tPl

ant

Perf

orm

ance

WPC

PA

nnua

lR

epor

t

IT

otal

Ptve

fage

Ave

raqe

Loa

dpg

TKN

rngl

LA

orn

nL

toad

kia

[0

Avra

Load

tng

Flow

(mFl

owm

fdey

CU

OD

mgt

t80

Dkq

/day

S$

mg

/L

JAN

140,

264

4,52

52

20

995

480

FEB

78,3

452,

798

625

1749

1225

12

0276

38

80

675

26

19

3700

APR

148787

4,96

07

753

84

42

07

5

MAY

113,

879

3674

76

02

79

214

.80

84,8

742,

829

47

51344

550

tê%

78,4

512,

531

28

07

09

8.00

72287

2,33

2575

1341

600

67,3

722,

246

425

954

42

5

6f

—70

,693

22

67

6.20

1418

380

iio

v73

,350

2,44

52

25

550

3.75

OBO

86621

2,7

94

150

699

450

Tate

tNm

ual

(,i%

9

lday

.:iM

.host

nn/L

1i.P

:hs.

.kg/

day

32

24

94

64280

032

14

4

46

10

1650

46

17

038

10

6

6411

1575

61

11

058

223

•42

.16

11.2

5H

55.8

00.

451

23

23.5

110

.80

39;6

70.

321.

18

3041

1400

3961

025

071

32

58

14

60

36

95

022

05

5

15.4

58,

50..i9

.82

0,08

0.17

Load

ing

1j,c

adin

gS

Skg

lday

1Mm

all.

kg/d

ay

21.7

2713

__________

34

28

16

48

__________

14

35

61653

__

__

__

__

__

_

10292

_____

850

__

__

__

__

__

_

640

__________

1556

1075

__________

20

25

12

88

__________

1399

6,63

__________

954

10

05

2257

8.69

1158

2648

917

1620

3961

1257

17.8

34981

______

+9

71

____________

VN

.kfl

J$%

94.j

74O

4J

iIt

4’6

ZW

fl14$?$f

••sG•

•ooo

4ó

n0

ia4d

o?

:,:.

ItO

O2

4.7

00.

0701

•5

13

80

31

56

01

10

25

17,2

542

.18

0.14

0.34

0.17

Mn

Oct

140

Hoe

.Ap

tll

0’

—LJ

Ø0

Met

-Oct

5441

1.00

Hb

.Ap

i7I2

‘.

p—

j(S

Q2 <

0p

C z n C 1 (10 C C

)

Muniipalhy of Brighton WPCP Annual Report 2007

Table VIIICerUficate of Analysis 4.(b) Samples of raw sewage shall be collected at locations acceptableto the District Manager and analyzed for at least parameters 1 to 4 at the indicated

minimum frequencies; parameters 5 to 8 are taken in order to analyze system performance.Raw Sewage Parameter Type of Sample Minimum Frequency jTotal # of Samples

1 CBOD5 grab monthly 1 122 Suspended Solids grab monthly 12

ITotal Phosphorus grab monthly 124 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen grab monthly 125 Ammonia (N) I grab monthly 126 Nitrite (N) grab monthly 127 Nitrate (N) grab monthly 12

Certificate of Analysis 4(c) Samples of effluent from the waste stabilization pond shall becollected at locations acceptable to the District Manager and analysed for at least thefollowing parameters(1-10) at the indicated minimum frequencies.

Waste Stabilization Type of Sample Minimum Frequency Total # of SamplesPond Effluentparameter u U

1 CBOD5 grab weekly 522 Suspended Solids grab weekly 523 Total Phosphorus grab weekly 524 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen grab weekly 525 Ammonia (N) grab weekly 526 Nitrite (N) grab weekly 527 Nitrate (N) grab weekly 528 pH grab weekly 529 Temperature grab weekly 52

10 E. Coli grab monthly 12

Certificate of Analysis 4.(d) Samples of effluent from the constructed wetland shall be collectedat locations acceptable to the District Manaqer and analysed for at least the followinq parameters (1-9) at the indicated minimum frequencies. E. CoIl is sampled to comply with C. of A.objective 5.(b).

constructed Wetland Type of Sample Minimum Frequency Total # of SamplesEffluent Parameter

1 CBOD5 grab weekly 522 Suspended Solids grab weekly 523 Total Phosphorus grab weekly 524 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen grab weekly 525 Ammonia (N) grab weekly 526 Nitrite (N) grab weekly 527 Nftrate (N) grab weekly 528 pH

‘ grab weekly I 52Ternperature grabE. Coli I grab

910

weeklymonthly

5212

12

Muiiicipality of Brighton WPCP Annual Report 2007

Certificate of Approval (5j(c) stipulates that the Owner shall endeavour to operate the sewage

treatment worlcs such that the effluent will not contain any oil or other substance in amounts

sufficient to create a visible film or sheen on the surface of the receiving waters and shall be

essentially free of any floating material.

Occasional foaming was present where wastewater cascades over weirs or from outfalls; this

appears to occur on a seasonal basis.

Certificate of Approval 6.(a) refers to proper maintenance of related equipment and

appurtenances to operate sewage works, including finding for operator training.

In September of this year we replaced the stand-by Generator at the Harbour Street Pumpins

Station

An Operations and Maintenance Manual is in place at the Sewage Works. Continuing education

for operators is promoted by the municipality for wastewater treatment and collection as well as

health, safety, and technical related courses.

Certificate of Approval 7.(c) Flows through the Brighton Wastewater Treatment lagoons and

wetlands are continuous.

Certificate of Approval 7.(d)(i) Summary of all monitoring data including an oven’iew of the

sewage treatment program.

Certificate of Approval 7.(d)(ii) Interpretation of all monitoring and analytical data and

comparison to the final effluent quality and quantity.

Table IX Brighton WPCP Perfommnce Summary details results and efficiency of the sewage

treatment performance demonstrathig pollutant removal rates from raw sewage concentrations

through to final effluent for CBOD5. Suspended Solids, Total Phosphorus, TKN and Ammonia.

Table IX also demonstrates the success of Brighton’s WPCP natural treatment process, which

includes:> 92.9% CBOD5 removal

> 93.1% removal of Suspended Solids

> 94.4% removal of Phosphorus

> 60.9% removal of Nitrogen

> 57.7% removal of Ammonia.

Certificate of Approval 7.(d)(iii) Summary of any final effluent quality assurance or control

measures undertaken during the reporting period.

13

Mun

icip

alit

yor

Bri

ghto

nS

ewag

eT

reat

men

tP

lant

Per

form

ance

rOw

s—

C0

00

1S

usp

on

ded

Soli

ds

Tol

olP

hoso

horo

us

TK

NA

iron

là‘9

‘1IW

euto

pR

wT

•Wii

Ehl*

rW

otia

no0.w

MO

NT

HT

old

Flow

Mai

lman

Cro

pIjo

Leg

eon

1’

tog000

12O

iTIu

eorf

c,w

,po

Lag

oon

0’L

agonro

flC

0urn

trW

op,

L.9

00n

IIU

goon

9280

10e1

o04

w#

sL

igoon

SIU

goon

12E

nn

ui

cwg9t

Lag

oon

IlL

ogoo

n82

Wri

iano

rIr

“°Y

4ii

Qtu

mfO

nJjJflg

g,,

fljg

J534.i

._J5

5L

J55

5L

0000

.4(m

aO.J

jog

6j.

.Jm

i_m

olt)

tail

.)Jr

r,n

&L

,JQ

m6L

.flm

a’i

901.

1!i

ytrt

Um

nli

1201

0.J

i_..

949,

264

45

25

716

63

20

01

70

02

20

220

4700

3600

48

04

40

170

05

5032

05

714

0662

00045

825

070

83

11.1

Ft

7834

5_fl

L,

330

8‘i

iW2500

62

53

50

9060

4000

—1235

57

52

71

’,“

Z80

380

20

3000

1800

1650

‘‘‘i

321

4017

316

“1

3’S

070

Mar

1202

763

88

06,

381

66

00

6200

67

55

50

1220

09600

3700

1650

3M

23

0020

3300

20

00

1575

1525

3200

184

1653

1505

Sos

A,_

148,

787

,_j9

60

765

324

0077

535

017

500

9000

.ug

L2

j3“‘

13

00

11

25

2580

50

0104

L_,

113,

079

3674

65

82

63

00

33

00

76

0,

44

015

2.00

7800

45

1820

386

1.50

3000

1700

io0

o420

1310

107

t40

I$

AJr

104874

337

05535”

3800

47

54

75

10

40

0550J

0’tt

<40

0014

0011

5028

5024

910

75‘8

13Ju

ly70

451

3,31

330

0030

0028

028

076

0027

260

600

760

240

48

4°

2000

1460

._...

2?jP

1070

6288

825

2i2

0A

ug72

287

2650

jQ

12.0

0575

525

ia_

IM00

#00

J,4

_*<

3?4

2000

850

J2S

2653

#40

17._

&nL

_..j

i&?L

3j,

2763

1820

018

0042

862

520

806

1520

0440

150

3.00

0.31

7108

2000

1100

1050

4800

1880

10ó5

‘‘

Dcl

7089

322

872

650

Th5S

o84

0062

0‘S

i’5W

1540

0355

460

*Th

o1T

h’50

0030

8013

8010

0050

00,,,,_fl

jOII

55125

Nov

296

854

0042

00225

250

1400

010

000

0if

l1%

240

22340

U4

,30

0617

25,..jj

3800

2160

1920

1460

44D

ec88

021

5682

6600

18.0

020

020

0‘‘

$4

44

S?4$

1L

%8331°

LIZjj

tJ9

19.0

1625

2470

1710

jT83

1fl6

Tot

al1,

135,

399

s07.

53...‘.

——

Afl

55fl

5,,

9461

731

0845

41so

Sz,

30492

7W

ISltS

A¶1

Ø11

45W

’U

iTh

3T’

“31W

’21

53W

k‘T

375’

1970

1174

Cer

A—

7”>

<“

,,V’

•I4

n(y

jro

l0Q

(#fl

SLO

nil8

00i

4.60

0o

3\

-,

••2J

z!8—

,._

sc

‘‘O

—

%E

McJ

snt

515%

9200

%94

2%25

2%°6

51%

7%

944

357%

,S

OS

688%

399%

577%

85

2%

_,

1759

l850m

ax1.

og2.

4ago

ca2

WO

ioW

olan

d—

—64

121

8la

n

n (0 -C C 1 0%)

C 0 —2

Municipality of Brighton WPCP Annual Report 2007.

Certificate of Approval 7.(d)(iv) Summary of maintenance carried out on major structure,

equipment, apparatus, mechanism forming part of the works.

> In January 2007 tile wet well at the Harbour Street Pumping Station was cleaned by a

contracted company.

Certificate of Approval 7.(d)(v) Summary of any environmental or operating problems

encountered and mitigative measures taken.

> Although there are no combined sanitary and storm sewers in Brighton, the collection system

is susceptible to higher flows with heavy precipitation events. Investigation of potential

incorrect sump pump connections in the community was commenced in 2006 to ensure that tile

discharge from sump pumps are not connected to the sanitary sewer system.

> Muskrat damage to the constructed wetlands have reduced plant oMh in the vegetated zones.

Seasonal trapping is being conducted to control muskrat population. This will become a yearly

on going situation due to the natural conditions for muskrats.

Certificate of Approval 7.(d)(vi) Summary of alterations, extensions or replacements in the

process or operation of the works which are considered for implementation over the next

reporting period.

Certificate of Approval 7.(d)(iv) Summary of calibration and maintenance procedures

conducted on all monitoring equipment

lvlilltronics performed annual calibration of flow meters at the Brighton WPCP on December 5th

2007.

4.4 Reporting — Non-Compliance

Certificate of Approval 7. (b) There was one non-compliance issues in this reporting period.

December of 2007 we reported to the Ministry of the Environment an exceedance of Ammonia

levels, our C of A stipulates that we do not exceed a level of 17 mg/L and we had a level of 17.83

mg!L.

16

0

Municipality of Brighton WPCP Annuat Report 2007

5.0 CONCLUSION

The Brighton Water Pollution Control Plant has been successflfl in treating the wastewaterutilizing the lagoons and wetlands through natural treatment processes. The final quality of theeffluent may be influenced by a majority of environmental factors such as climate or wildlife.Enhanced performance is exhibited during warmer months when nutrients are absorbed from thegrowth of vegetation and bacteria are most active. Wastewater effluent from the wastewaterpollution control plant (NVPCP) is tested at Caduceon Environmental Labs, a certified lab, on aweekly basis as per Certificate of Approval. The effluent quality from the lagoon and wetland siteto Presqu’ile Bay has met and/or exceeded the contaminant limits and objectives set under theterms and conditions of the Certificate of Approval. Brighton is dedicated to achieving continuousimprovement of its wastewater treatment system and being environmentally responsible to thequality of its receiving waters. -

- -

17