impact of changes to pretrial release rulesregarding pretrial release and the use of cash bail...

Impact of Changes to Pretrial Release Rules

2

Contents

Introduction ......................................................................................................................................3

Background ............................................................................................................................................. 3

Judiciary Guidance, New Rule 4-216.1 ................................................................................................... 4

Current Method for Determining Affordable Bail Amounts for Defendant ........................................... 4

Preliminary Evaluation, Impact of Rule ...............................................................................................4

Committee Requested Data ................................................................................................................... 5

Data Findings .....................................................................................................................................6

Recommendations, Implementation of New Rule 4-2016.1 .................................................................8

Attachment 1: New Rule 4-216.1 ........................................................................................................9

Attachment 2: Letter of Advice ......................................................................................................... 15

Attachment 3: Statistical Evaluation, Impact of New Rule 4-216.1 ..................................................... 16

Table 1: Criminal Cases Pretrial Dispositions: Total Number and as a Percentage of Initial Appearances, July 2016-September 2017 by Jurisdiction and Month: (1) Held on Default of Bond (Held on Cash Bail); (2) Released on Own Recognizance; (3) Released with Unsecured Personal Bond (non-monetary conditions); (4) Held Without Bail. ............................................................................. 16

Table 2: Criminal Cases Pretrial Dispositions: Total Number and as a Percentage of Initial Appearances, July 2016-September 2017 by Jurisdiction: (1) Held on Default of Bond (Held on Cash Bail); (2) Released on Own Recognizance; (3) Released with Unsecured Personal Bond (non-monetary conditions); (4) Held Without Bail. ...................................................................................... 34

Table 3: Outcomes After Bail Review, Number and as a Percentage Of Initial Appearances, July 2016- September 2017, by Month And Jurisdiction. ...................................................................................... 36

Table 4: Outcomes After Bail Review, Number and as a Percentage Of Initial Appearances, July 2016- September 2017, All Months by Jurisdiction. ...................................................................................... 54

Table 5: Failure to Appear Rates, Criminal Cases: July 2016-September 2017 by Month and Jurisdiction, Number and Percentage of Defendants that Fail to Appear (as a percentage of Initial Appearances): ....................................................................................................................................... 56

Table 6: Failure to Appear Rates, Criminal Cases: July 2016-September 2017 by Jurisdiction. Number and Percentage of Defendants that Fail to Appear (as a percentage of Initial Appearances): ............ 80

Table 7: Defendants Held in Custody for More than Five Days after Bail is Set, Criminal Cases: July 2016-September 2017 by month and Jurisdiction. Number and Percentage of Defendants Held in Custody for More than Five Days After Bail is Set (as a percentage of Initial Appearances) ............... 82

Table 8: Defendants Held in Custody for More than Five Days after Bail is Set, Criminal Cases: July 2016-September 2017 by Jurisdiction, Number and Percentage of Defendants Held in Custody for More than Five Days After Bail is Set (as a percentage of Initial Appearances) .................................. 96

3

Introduction

Joint Chairmen’s Report, page 12: “The committees are interested in the impact of recent changes to the Maryland Rules regarding pretrial release and the use of cash bail across the State. As the General Assembly continues to consider statutory changes to the pretrial system, it will be especially important to understand the impact of the decreased utilization of cash bail likely to occur under the new rule. Therefore, the committees request a report on the implementation of the new rule from its effective date, July 1, 2017, to September 30, 2017. The report should provide:

• An update on pretrial release practices, including any guidance on the new rule issued by the Judiciary

• A preliminary evaluation of the rule’s impact on reducing the number of individuals held because they cannot afford to pay their set bail

• An explanation of how affordable bail amounts are determined for individual defendants

• Recommendations for General Assembly action that would be beneficial to the implementation of the new rule”

Background In October of 2016, the Office of the Maryland Attorney General opined, with regard to pretrial release and bail, that:

“…the Court of Appeals would conclude that the State's statutory law and court rules should be applied to require a judicial officer to conduct an individualized inquiry into a criminal defendant's ability to pay a financial condition of pretrial release. Although it is less clear that defendants have a constitutional right to an individualized inquiry, constitutional considerations provide further support to the requirement of an individualized inquiry. It is also my view that, while imposing a financial condition is allowed under current State law and is not unconstitutional in and of itself, the Court of Appeals would likely hold that, in the event a judicial officer determines that pretrial detention is not justified to meet the State's regulatory goals, a judicial officer may not impose a financial condition set solely to detain the defendant. Conditions of pretrial release must instead be the least onerous to reasonably ensure the appearance of the defendant as required, protect the safety of the victim, or ensure that the defendant will not pose a danger to another person or the community. As a result, setting the bail in an amount not affordable to the

4

defendant, thus effectively denying release, raises a significant risk that the Court of Appeals would find it violates due process. If pretrial detention is not justified yet bail is set out of reach financially for the defendant, it is also likely the Court would declare that the bail is excessive under the Eighth Amendment and Article 25 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights.”

Judiciary Guidance, New Rule 4-216.1 Maryland took its first step toward bail reform in February of 2017 when the Court of Appeals adopted new Rule 4-216.1 (“Rule”) (Attachment 1: Rule 4-216.1). That Rule provided guidance to judicial officers regarding pretrial release of arrested individuals. The effective date of Rule 4-216.1 was July 1, 2017.

As it states, “[t]his Rule is designed to promote the release of defendants on their own recognizance or, when necessary, unsecured bond. Additional conditions should be imposed on release only if the need to ensure appearance at court proceedings, to protect the community, victims, witnesses, or any other person and to maintain the integrity of the judicial process is demonstrated by the circumstances of the individual case. Preference should be given to additional conditions without financial terms.”

Prior to the effective date of the Rule, leadership in both the Circuit and District courts sent a Letter of Advice to all judges and commissioners to assist them in the proper determination of bail. A copy of the Letter of Advice is attached as Attachment 2. Other guidance offered on the new pretrial release rules included presentations and communications with commissioners and judges regarding the proper interpretation of both the Letter of Advice and the new Maryland Rule. In June 2017, Judge Alan Wilner, Chair of the Maryland Judiciary’s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure, led a plenary session at the Judicial Conference focusing on the new Rule and its implications.

Current Method for Determining Affordable Bail Amounts for Defendant

For guidance on how affordable bail amounts are determined for individual defendants, the Judiciary would direct the Maryland General Assembly to the parameters set forth in the Rule.

Preliminary Evaluation, Impact of Rule The passage of Maryland Rule 2-416.1 is part of a larger focus to improve pretrial justice. The enclosed data indicates that since the Letter of Advice was sent on October 26, 2016, significantly more individuals are being released on their own recognizance from pretrial detention. In addition, the use of Unsecured Personal Bonds, also a release of the individual from pretrial detention, has increased. Concurrently, the number of individuals being held on a cash bail has decreased significantly. Individuals being placed in a Hold without Bail status has increased since the Letter of Advice and the new Rule took effect. While the overall number of individuals Held without Bail has increased, the overall number of all individuals held pretrial has decreased. This increase is directly related to the decrease in the number of individuals Held in Default of Bond.

5

To complement the effects of the new Rule, enhanced pretrial services must be implemented in each county that does not yet have a pretrial services unit. The data indicates that the Rule is succeeding in ensuring that lower level offenders are not detained solely because they cannot afford bail. It also indicates that those that pose the most risk are being preventively detained. The more challenging cases are found in the middle of the spectrum where an effective county based pretrial system would ensure public safety while contemporaneously reducing pretrial jail populations. While the larger counties utilize pretrial supervision programs, the adoption of effective pretrial service programs with varying levels of supervision informed by a risk assessment tool in all counties is needed. Eleven of the 24 counties in Maryland have some form of pretrial services, some as rudimentary as telephone calls to defendants, some as sophisticated as varying levels of supervision based on the use of a risk and needs assessment tool. At least five counties have recently initiated serious discussions between justice partners, primarily the courts and detention centers, regarding the development of pretrial services programs. The Judiciary is collaborating with its justice partners to pilot pretrial programs in three of those jurisdictions and is in the first stages of investigating a statewide risk assessment tool. In addition, a one day conference with various criminal justice partners to further explore the nuts and bolts of developing and running a pretrial services program and how to develop and use a risk assessment tool will assist with implementing county plans. A delay in legislative action is requested to allow these pretrial opportunities to be explored.

Committee Requested Data To complete an evaluation of the impact of New Rule 4-2016.1 as requested by the Committee, the following statistics were analyzed:

• Pretrial Bail Review Outcomes, July 2016-September 2017

• Pretrial Initial Appearance Bail Outcome Statistics, July 2016-September 2017

• Initial Appearance: Held-Without-Bail (HWOB) Bail Review Statistics, July 2016-September 2017

• Pretrial: Defendants Held for Five days or more, July 201[6]1-September 2017

• Failure to Appear: Report by Jurisdiction, July 2016-September 2017

1 Although the Committee report requested data from July 2017 to September 2017, this report includes data from July 2016 to September 2017.

6

Attachment 3: Statistical Evaluation, Impact of New Rule 4-216.1 provides the findings of this statistical evaluation as requested by the Committee in their request:

1. Committee Request: Pretrial Dispositions

o Requested Date Range: July 2016-September 2017 by month

o Requested Geographic Specifications: Jurisdictional

o Disposition Data Requested

Held on Cash Bail, number and as a percentage of Initial Appearances

Released Without Conditions or On Own Recognizance, number and as a percentage of Initial Appearances

Released with Non-Monetary Conditions, number and as a percentage of Initial Appearances

Held Without Bail, number and as a percentage of Initial Appearances

2. Committee Request: Failure to Appear Rates

o Requested Date Range: July 2016-September 2017

o Requested Geographic Specifications: Jurisdictional

o Data requested

Number and percentage of defendants that fail to appear (as a percentage of Initial Appearances).

3. Committee Request: Defendants Held in Custody for More than Five Days after Bail is Set

o Requested Date Range: July 2017-September 2017

o Data requested

Number and percentage of defendants (as a percentage of Initial Appearances)

Data Findings The following nomenclature is used in the statistical evaluation:

1. Held on cash bail is signified by Held on Default of Bond. Released without conditions or on recognizance is signified by Released on Recognizance (ROR). Please note that all RORs contain the condition that the individual obey all laws and return to court. The Maryland Judiciary does not track any additional conditions placed on a particular individual.

2. Released with non-monetary conditions is also signified by Unsecured Personal Bonds (UPB). A UPB is a promise to pay a certain amount by an individual should they fail to appear for court. Together, UPB and ROR constitute the Release Rate.

7

3. Held without Bail is signified by Held without Bail (HWOB). 4. Percent Bonds (PCT) and ParB are not included in the tables. PCT and ParB indicate a

cash bail that is less than 100%, typically 10%. For example, a $1,000.00 bail, 10% cash to the court means the individual can post $100.00 to the court and the collateral will be returned to the individual assuming the individual returns to court for their court date.

5. BALR indicates a Bail Review hearing by a judge. 6. An Initial Appearance is the first interaction with a judicial officer, typically a

Commissioner, after arrest. Any individual that is not released by a Commissioner will be seen by a judge at a Bail Review hearing the next court session.

7. The charts include only criminal offenses. Jailable traffic offenses are not included. Table 1 shows the number and outcomes of first Initial Appearances conducted by Commissioners by county by month. Table 2 shows the same data for the entire period from July 2016 to September 2017. When the months of July 2016 to October 2016 (hearings held prior to the Letter of Advice) are compared to the months of November 2016 to September 2017 (hearings held after the Letter of Advice), the following results can be seen:

• The percentage of individuals Released on Recognizance at the Initial Appearance increased from 35.4% to 41.5%.

• The percentage of individuals Released on an Unsecured Personal Bond at the Initial Appearance increased from 9.0% to 10.5%.

• The percentage of individuals Held in Default of Bond at the Initial Appearance dropped from 40.2% to 20.8%.

• The percentage of individuals Held without Bail at the Initial Appearance increased from 7.5% to 19.3%.

Table 3 shows the number and outcome of individuals appearing before a judge at a Bail Review hearing by county, by month. Table 4 shows the same data for the entire period from July 2016 to September 2017. Bail Review hearings are conducted at the next court session after the Initial Appearance and consist of those individuals that were Held in Default of Bond that failed to post the bond prior to the Bail Review hearing and those individuals that were Held without Bail. It is important to note that Commissioners are statutorily required to Hold without Bail certain individuals. [MD Rule 4-216(d)] Judges may alter these statutorily required Held without Bonds at the Bail Review hearing. The following results can be seen by comparison between Table 2 and Table 4:

• The percentage of those individuals that were Held without Bail by a Commissioner drops from 16.2% (Table 2) to 10.7% (Table 4) after a Bail Review hearing.

• 5.2% of the individuals who are no longer in a Held without Bail status as the result of the Bond Review are Released on Recognizance, 17.9 % are given a bond, and 2.2% are given an Unsecured Personal Bond.

8

Tables 5 and 6 indicate the initial Failure to Appear rate after an Initial Appearance. It is important to note that individuals Held in Default of Bond may remain detained in jail until the first trial date thereby reducing the FTA for those Held in Default of Bond. The results of Tables 5 and 6 indicate:

• The overall FTA rate in criminal cases is 9.4%. • The average FTA rate for those individuals that were Held in Default of Bond is 2.4%

during the reporting period. • The average FTA rate for those individuals that were Released on Recognizance is 5.7%

during the reporting period. • The average FTA rate for those released on an Unsecured Personal Bond is 1.3%.

When the months of July 2016 to October 2016 (hearings held prior to the Letter of Advice) are compared to the months of November 2016 to September 2017 (hearings held after the Letter of Advice), the following results can be seen:

• The overall FTA rate decreased from 10.1% to 9.2%. • The FTA rate decreased from 3.1 to 2.1% for those individuals that were Held in Default

of Bond. • The FTA rate held constant at 5.7% for those individuals Released on Recognizance. • The FTA rate increased from 1.2% to 1.4% for those released on an Unsecured Personal

Bond.

Tables 7 and 8 indicate the number and percentage of individuals Released on Recognizance or on an Unsecured Personal Bond, those individuals Held without Bond at 6 days, and those individuals Held in Default of Bond for more than 5 days. When the months of July 2016 to October 2016 (hearings held prior to the Letter of Advice) are compared to the months of November 2016 to September 2017 (hearings held after the Letter of Advice), the following results can be seen: • The percentage of individuals Released on Recognizance or Unsecured Personal Bonds

increased from 44.6% to 52.4%. • The percentage of individuals Held in Default of Bond for more than 5 days decreased

from 17% to 8%. • The percentage of individuals Held without Bond at 6 days increased from 6.5% to

15.8%.

Recommendations, Implementation of New Rule 4-2016.1 The Judiciary does not make any recommendations at this time regarding action that would be beneficial to the implementation of this Rule and further again would request that legislators give time for the Rule to make an impact on pretrial detention before making any changes.

9

Attachment 1: New Rule 4-216.1 RULE 4-216.1. PRETRIAL RELEASE--STANDARDS GOVERNING

West's Annotated Code of Maryland Maryland Rules

MD Rules, Rule 4-216.1

RULE 4-216.1. PRETRIAL RELEASE--STANDARDS GOVERNING

Currentness

(a) Definitions. The following definitions apply in this Rule:

(1) Appearance; Appear. “Appearance” or “appear” means the appearance of the defendant in court whenever required.

(2) Bond. “Bond” means a written obligation of the person signing the bond conditioned on the appearance of the defendant and providing for the payment of a penalty sum according to its terms.

(3) Collateral Security. “Collateral security” means any property deposited, pledged, or encumbered to secure the performance of a bond.

(4) Compensated Surety. “Compensated surety” means a person who is licensed to become a surety on bonds written in the county and who charges compensation for acting as surety for defendants.

(5) Release on Personal Recognizance. “Release on personal recognizance” means a release, without the requirement of a bond, based on a written promise by the defendant (A) to appear in court when required to do so, (B) to commit no criminal offense while on release, and (C) to comply with all other conditions imposed by the judicial officer pursuant to this Rule, Rule 4-216.2, or by other law while on release.

Committee note: The principal differences between a personal recognizance and a bond are that the former does not provide for payment of a penalty sum if the defendant fails to appear when required and is not subject to any financial conditions.

(6) Special Condition. “Special condition” means a condition of release required by a judicial officer, other than the conditions that the defendant appear in court when required to do so and commit no criminal offense while on release.

(7) Special Condition of Release with Financial Terms. “Special condition of release with financial terms” means the requirement of collateral security or the guarantee of the defendant's appearance by a compensated surety as a condition of the defendant's release. The term does not include (A) an unsecured bond by the defendant or (B) the cost associated with a service that is a condition of release and is affordable by the defendant or waived by the court.

10

Committee note: Examples of a condition of release that is not a special condition of release with financial terms are participation in an ignition interlock program, use of an alcohol consumption monitoring system, and GPS monitoring.

(8) Surety. “Surety” means a person other than the defendant who, by executing a bond, guarantees the appearance of the defendant and includes an uncompensated or accommodation surety.

(9) Surety Insurer. “Surety insurer” means a person in the business of becoming, either directly or through an agent, a surety on a bond for compensation.

(10) Uncompensated Surety. “Uncompensated surety” means an accommodation surety who does not charge or receive compensation for acting as a surety for the defendant.

(b) General Principles.

(1) Construction.

(A) This Rule is designed to promote the release of defendants on their own recognizance or, when necessary, unsecured bond. Additional conditions should be imposed on release only if the need to ensure appearance at court proceedings, to protect the community, victims, witnesses, or any other person and to maintain the integrity of the judicial process is demonstrated by the circumstances of the individual case. Preference should be given to additional conditions without financial terms.

(B) This Rule shall be construed to permit the release of a defendant pending trial except upon a finding by the judicial officer that, if the defendant is released, there is a reasonable likelihood that the defendant (i) will not appear when required, or (ii) will be a danger to an alleged victim, another person, or the community. If such a finding is made, the defendant shall not be released.

Cross reference: Code, Criminal Procedure Article, § 5-101. For the inapplicability of the Rules in Title 5 to pretrial release proceedings, see Rule 5-101 (b).

(2) Individualized Consideration. A decision by a judicial officer whether or on what conditions to release a defendant shall be based on a consideration of specific facts and circumstances applicable to the particular defendant, including the ability of the defendant to meet a special condition of release with financial terms or comply with a special condition and the facts and circumstances constituting probable cause for the charges.

(3) Least Onerous Conditions. If a judicial officer determines that a defendant should be released other than on personal recognizance or unsecured bond without special conditions, the judicial officer shall impose on the defendant the least onerous condition or combination of conditions of release set forth in section (d) of this Rule that will reasonably ensure (A) the appearance of the defendant, and (B) the safety of each alleged victim, other persons, and the community and may impose a financial condition only in accordance with section (e) of this Rule.

11

Committee note: If a defendant was arrested without a warrant and the judicial officer finds no probable cause for any of the charges or for the arrest, Rule 4-216 (a) requires that the defendant be released on personal recognizance, with no conditions imposed.

(4) Exceptions. Nothing in this Rule is intended to preclude a defendant from being held in custody based on an alleged violation of

(A) a condition of pretrial release, a release under Rule 4-349, or an order of probation or parole previously imposed in another case, or (B) a condition of pretrial release previously imposed in the instant case.

(c) Release on Personal Recognizance or Unsecured Bond.

(1) Generally. Except as otherwise limited by Code, Criminal Procedure Article, § 5-101 or § 5-202, unless the judicial officer finds that no permissible non-financial condition attached to a release will reasonably ensure (A) the appearance of the defendant, and (B) the safety of each alleged victim, other persons, or the community, the judicial officer shall release a defendant on personal recognizance or unsecured bond, with or without special conditions. If the judicial officer makes such a finding, the judicial officer shall state the basis for it on the record.

Committee note: Pursuant to section (b) of this Rule, the preference should be for release on personal recognizance.

Cross reference: Code, Criminal Procedure Article, § 5-101 (c) precludes release on personal recognizance if the defendant is charged with certain crimes. Section 5-202 of that Article precludes release by a District Court commissioner if the defendant is charged with certain crimes under certain circumstances.

(2) Permissible Conditions. Permissible conditions for purposes of this section include the required conditions set forth in subsection (d) (1) and the special conditions set forth or authorized in subsection (d) (2) of this Rule.

(d) Special Conditions of Release.

(1) Required Conditions. There shall be included, as conditions of any release of the defendant that (A) the defendant will not engage in any criminal conduct during the period of pretrial release, and (B) the defendant will appear in court when required to do so.

(2) Special Conditions. Subject to section (b) of this Rule, special conditions of release imposed by a judicial officer under this Rule may include, to the extent appropriate and capable of implementation:

(A) one or more of the conditions authorized under Code, Criminal Law Article, § 9-304 reasonably necessary to stop or prevent the intimidation of a victim or witness or a violation of Code, Criminal Law Article, §§ 9-302, 9-303, or 9-305, including a general no-contact order;

(B) reasonable restrictions with respect to travel, association, and place of residence

(C) a requirement that the defendant maintain employment or, if unemployed, actively seek employment;

12

(D) a requirement that the defendant maintain or commence an educational program;

(E) a reasonable curfew, taking into account the defendant's employment, educational, or other lawful commitments;

(F) a requirement that the defendant refrain from possessing a firearm, destructive device, or other dangerous weapon;

(G) a requirement that the defendant refrain from excessive use of alcohol or use or possession of a narcotic drug or other controlled dangerous substance, as defined in Code, Criminal Law Article, § 5-101 (f), without a prescription from a licensed medical practitioner;

(H) a requirement that the defendant undergo available medical, psychological, or psychiatric treatment or counseling for drug or alcohol dependency;

(I) electronic monitoring;

(J) periodic reporting to designated supervisory persons;

(K) committing the defendant to the custody or supervision of a designated person or organization that agrees to supervise the defendant and assist in ensuring the defendant's appearance in court;

Committee note: The judicial officer may commit the defendant generally to supervision by a pretrial services unit operating in the county, subject to more detailed requirements of that unit appropriate to the supervision.

(L) execution of unsecured bonds by the defendant and an uncompensated surety who (i) has a verifiable and lawful personal relationship with the defendant, (ii) is acceptable to the judicial officer, and (iii) is willing to execute such a bond in an amount specified by the judicial officer;

(M) execution of a bond in an amount specified by the judicial officer secured by the deposit of collateral security equal in value to not more than 10% of the penalty amount of the bond or by the obligation of a surety, including a surety insurer, acceptable to the judicial officer;

(N) execution of a bond secured by the deposit of collateral security of a value in excess of 10% of the penalty amount of the bond or by the obligation of a surety, including a surety insurer, acceptable to the judicial officer; and

Committee note: A compensated surety qualified under Rule 4-217 is presumptively acceptable. Before finding an uncompensated surety to be acceptable, the judicial officer should inquire into the ability of the proposed surety to satisfy the condition of the bond if called upon to do so. Whenever possible, however, the judicial officer should give preference to an uncompensated surety having a verifiable and lawful personal relationship with the defendant and, if collateral security is required, should accept the posting of adequate real or personal property of that surety or the defendant. This preference is based on the inference that the defendant may be more likely to appear when required if the liability and property of a friend or family member is at risk.

13

(O) any other lawful condition that will help ensure the appearance of the defendant or the safety of each alleged victim, other persons, or the community.

(e) Release on Special Conditions.

(1) Generally.

(A) A judicial officer may not impose a special condition of release with financial terms in form or amount that results in the pretrial detention of the defendant solely because the defendant is financially incapable of meeting that condition. In making that determination, the judicial officer may consider all resources available to the defendant from any lawful source.

Committee note: Information regarding the defendant's financial situation may come from several sources. The Initial Appearance Questionnaire Form used by District Court commissioners seeks information from the defendant regarding employment, occupation, amount and source of income, housing status, marital status, and number of dependents relying on the defendant's income. The criminal and juvenile record checks made by the commissioner also may reveal relevant information. Additional information may be available to the judge at a bail review proceeding from a defense attorney, the State's Attorney, and a pretrial services unit.

(B) Special conditions of release with financial terms are appropriate only to ensure the appearance of the defendant and may not be imposed solely to prevent future criminal conduct during the pretrial period or to protect the safety of any person or the community; nor may they be imposed to punish the defendant or to placate public opinion.

(C) Special conditions of release with financial terms may not be set by reference to a predetermined schedule of amounts fixed according to the nature of the charge.

(2) Other Permissible Conditions. If the judicial officer finds that one or more special conditions also may be required to reasonably ensure (A) the appearance of the defendant, and (B) the safety of each alleged victim, other persons, or the community, the judicial officer may impose on the defendant one or more special conditions in accordance with section (d) of this Rule.

(f) Consideration of Factors.

(1) Recommendation of Pretrial Release Services Program. In determining whether a defendant should be released and the conditions of release, the judicial officer shall give consideration to the recommendation of any pretrial release services program that has made a risk assessment of the defendant in accordance with a validated risk assessment tool and is willing to provide an acceptable level of supervision over the defendant during the period of release if so directed by the judicial officer.

(2) Other Factors. In addition to any recommendation made in accordance with subsection (f)(1) of this Rule, the judicial officer shall consider the following factors:

(A) the nature and circumstances of the offense charged, the nature of the evidence against the defendant, and the potential sentence upon conviction;

14

(B) the defendant's prior record of appearance at court proceedings or flight to avoid prosecution or failure to appear at court proceedings;

(C) the defendant's family ties, employment status and history, financial resources, reputation, character and mental condition, length of residence in the community, and length of residence in this State;

(D) any request made under Code, Criminal Procedure Article, § 5-201 (a) for reasonable protections for the safety of an alleged victim;

(E) any recommendation of an agency that conducts pretrial release investigations;

(F) any information presented by the State's Attorney and any recommendation of the State's Attorney;

(G) any information presented by the defendant or defendant's attorney;

(H) the danger of the defendant to an alleged victim, another person, or the community;

(I) the danger of the defendant to himself or herself; and

(J) any other factor bearing on the risk of a willful failure to appear and the safety of each alleged victim, another person, or the community, including all prior convictions and any prior adjudications of delinquency that occurred within three years of the date the defendant is charged as an adult.

(g) Disclosure. If the judicial officer requires collateral security, the judicial officer shall advise the defendant that, if the defendant or an uncompensated surety posts the required cash or other property, it will be refunded at the conclusion of the criminal proceedings if the defendant has not defaulted in the performance of the conditions of the bond.

Source: This Rule is new.

Credits

[Adopted February 16, 2017, eff. July 1, 2017.]

MD Rules, Rule 4-216.1, MD R CR Rule 4-216.1

Current with amendments received through September 1, 2017

15

Attachment 2: Letter of Advice

Judges/Commissioners: In light of the recent AG's opinion, the case law relied upon in that opinion, the ABA Criminal Justice Section Standards on Pretrial Release (Third Edition), and current Maryland Rule 4-216, please find below cautionary advice for consideration to help guide you when setting bail.

1. A defendant should be released on personal recognizance, with or without permissible

conditions, unless the judicial officer finds that no permissible condition or combination of such conditions will reasonably assure (i) the appearance of the defendant when required, and (ii) the safety of alleged victims, other persons, and the community. If the judicial officer makes such a finding, the Rule requires the basis for the finding must be stated clearly on the record so that it is capable of review.

2. If the defendant cannot be released on personal recognizance, the judicial officer should impose

the least onerous condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably ensure the appearance of the defendant and the safety of alleged victims, other persons, and the community.

3. The posting of money or other property or the obligation of a compensated surety should be used only when necessary to assure the appearance of the defendant rather than for the assurance of public safety.

4. Financial conditions are not an appropriate way of assuring public safety and should not be imposed for the purpose of assuring the detention of the defendant.

5. If there is any reasonable likelihood of danger to victims, other persons, or the community, the defendant should not be released.

6. Financial conditions should not be imposed if you know or have reason to believe that the defendant is financially incapable of meeting.

7. Financial conditions should not be imposed in order to placate public opinion or to punish the defendant.

8. These principles should be construed to avoid, whenever possible, defendants being detained who do not need to be detained.

John P. Morrissey, Chief Judge, District Court of Maryland

16

Attachment 3: Statistical Evaluation, Impact of New Rule 4-216.1

Table 1: Criminal Cases Pretrial Dispositions: Total Number and as a Percentage of Initial Appearances, July 2016-September 2017 by Jurisdiction and Month: (1) Held on Default of Bond (Held on Cash Bail); (2) Released on Own Recognizance; (3) Released with Unsecured Personal Bond (non-monetary conditions); (4) Held Without Bail.

County/Month/Year Number: Total Initial Appearances

Number: Total Held on Default of Bond After Initial Appearance

Percent: Held in Default of Bond After Initial Appearance

Number: Released on own Recognizance After Initial Appearance

Percent: Released on Own Recognizance After Initial Appearance

Number: Released on Unsecured Personal Bond After Initial Appearance

Percent: Released on Unsecured Bond After Initial Appearances

Number: Held Without Bail After Initial Appearance

Percent: Held Without Bail After Initial Appearance

Jul-16

ALLEGANY COUNTY 118 60 50.8% 37 31.4% 4 3.4% 3 2.5%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

688 258 37.5% 347 50.4% 48 7.0% 31 4.5%

BALTIMORE CITY 1622 687 42.4% 560 34.5% 62 3.8% 189 11.7%

BALTIMORE COUNTY 832 506 60.8% 196 23.6% 43 5.2% 73 8.8%

CALVERT COUNTY 124 22 17.7% 44 35.5% 32 25.8% 3 2.4%

CAROLINE COUNTY 44 22 50.0% 7 15.9% 6 13.6% 4 9.1%

CARROLL COUNTY 123 39 31.7% 53 43.1% 24 19.5% 6 4.9%

CECIL COUNTY 169 49 29.0% 55 32.5% 32 18.9% 6 3.6%

CHARLES COUNTY 151 42 27.8% 79 52.3% 16 10.6% 7 4.6%

DORCHESTER COUNTY 90 59 65.6% 11 12.2% 14 15.6% 3 3.3%

FREDERICK COUNTY 163 53 32.5% 88 54.0% 11 6.7% 6 3.7%

GARRETT COUNTY 28 4 14.3% 12 42.9% 1 3.6% 2 7.1%

HARFORD COUNTY 143 53 37.1% 68 47.6% 3 2.1% 11 7.7%

HOWARD COUNTY 164 69 42.1% 29 17.7% 50 30.5% 6 3.7%

KENT COUNTY 19 6 31.6% 10 52.6% 2 10.5% 0 0.0%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

634 249S 39.3% 130 20.5% 123 19.4% 35 5.5%

17










PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY

1050 409 39.0% 425 40.5% 20 1.9% 64 6.1%

QUEEN ANNE’S COUNTY

41 15 36.6% 16 39.0% 8 19.5% 1 2.4%

SAINT MARY’S COUNTY

117 27 23.1% 47 40.2% 19 16.2% 10 8.5%

SOMERSET COUNTY 38 19 50.0% 5 13.2% 12 31.6% 2 5.3%

TALBOT COUNTY 66 16 24.2% 28 42.4% 16 24.2% 1 1.5%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

161 72 44.7% 60 37.3% 13 8.1% 8 5.0%

WICOMICO COUNTY 221 119 53.8% 65 29.4% 21 9.5% 8 3.6%

WORCESTER COUNTY 364 83 22.8% 219 60.2% 34 9.3% 1 0.3%

STATEWIDE JULY 2016

7170 2938 41.0% 2591 36.1% 614 8.6% 480 6.7%

Aug-16

ALLEGANY COUNTY 126 63 50.0% 37 29.4% 1 0.8% 13 10.3%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

661 243 36.8% 326 49.3% 43 6.5% 37 5.6%

BALTIMORE CITY 1517 631 41.6% 513 33.8% 70 4.6% 177 11.7%


CALVERT COUNTY 102 23 22.5% 18 17.6% 37 36.3% 3 2.9%

CAROLINE COUNTY 56 25 44.6% 10 17.9% 12 21.4% 7 12.5%

CARROLL COUNTY 109 45 41.3% 30 27.5% 19 17.4% 13 11.9%

CECIL COUNTY 144 46 31.9% 38 26.4% 24 16.7% 10 6.9%

CHARLES COUNTY 155 33 21.3% 77 49.7% 18 11.6% 12 7.7%



GARRETT COUNTY 31 8 25.8% 12 38.7% 5 16.1% 1 3.2%

HARFORD COUNTY 171 64 37.4% 72 42.1% 4 2.3% 15 8.8%

18










HOWARD COUNTY 165 63 38.2% 17 10.3% 50 30.3% 14 8.5%

KENT COUNTY 13 4 30.8% 2 15.4% 5 38.5% 0 0.0%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

603 232 38.5% 119 19.7% 123 20.4% 32 5.3%


927 387 41.7% 343 37.0% 30 3.2% 48 5.2%


55 34 61.8% 11 20.0% 7 12.7% 2 3.6%


106 19 17.9% 52 49.1% 22 20.8% 4 3.8%

SOMERSET COUNTY 38 20 52.6% 4 10.5% 12 31.6% 2 5.3%

TALBOT COUNTY 52 17 32.7% 22 42.3% 6 11.5% 5 9.6%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

173 73 42.2% 67 38.7% 13 7.5% 14 8.1%

WICOMICO COUNTY 203 114 56.2% 63 31.0% 13 6.4% 12 5.9%


STATEWIDE AUGUST 2016

6753 2827 41.9% 2298 34.0% 595 8.8% 501 7.4%

Sep-16

ALLEGANY COUNTY 140 66 47.1% 47 33.6% 4 2.9% 9 6.4%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

661 240 36.3% 337 51.0% 45 6.8% 33 5.0%

BALTIMORE CITY 1552 647 41.7% 571 36.8% 51 3.3% 162 10.4%


CALVERT COUNTY 122 32 26.2% 24 19.7% 48 39.3% 3 2.5%

CAROLINE COUNTY 39 12 30.8% 17 43.6% 6 15.4% 2 5.1%

CARROLL COUNTY 92 42 45.7% 25 27.2% 19 20.7% 4 4.3%

CECIL COUNTY 176 65 36.9% 50 28.4% 20 11.4% 7 4.0%

CHARLES COUNTY 176 42 23.9% 95 54.0% 13 7.4% 10 5.7%

19












GARRETT COUNTY 23 12 52.2% 4 17.4% 4 17.4% 1 4.3%

HARFORD COUNTY 184 47 25.5% 102 55.4% 3 1.6% 20 10.9%

HOWARD COUNTY 199 72 36.2% 28 14.1% 63 31.7% 13 6.5%

KENT COUNTY 17 11 64.7% 2 11.8% 3 17.6% 0 0.0%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

649 198 30.5% 154 23.7% 156 24.0% 22 3.4%


873 360 41.2% 330 37.8% 19 2.2% 60 6.9%


48 27 56.3% 11 22.9% 6 12.5% 4 8.3%


106 28 26.4% 42 39.6% 20 18.9% 6 5.7%

SOMERSET COUNTY 44 26 59.1% 6 13.6% 11 25.0% 1 2.3%

TALBOT COUNTY 67 22 32.8% 24 35.8% 14 20.9% 5 7.5%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

170 80 47.1% 60 35.3% 11 6.5% 9 5.3%

WICOMICO COUNTY 188 100 53.2% 58 30.9% 22 11.7% 4 2.1%


STATEWIDE SEPTEMBER 2016

6696 2699 40.3% 2392 35.7% 614 9.2% 456 6.8%

Oct-16

ALLEGANY COUNTY 112 46 41.1% 47 42.0% 8 7.1% 5 4.5%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

620 178 28.7% 329 53.1% 52 8.4% 56 9.0%

BALTIMORE CITY 1468 649 44.2% 523 35.6% 47 3.2% 167 11.4%


CALVERT COUNTY 94 23 24.5% 20 21.3% 40 42.6% 0 0.0%

20










CAROLINE COUNTY 45 12 26.7% 16 35.6% 10 22.2% 4 8.9%

CARROLL COUNTY 112 48 42.9% 35 31.3% 16 14.3% 13 11.6%

CECIL COUNTY 144 49 34.0% 46 31.9% 15 10.4% 11 7.6%

CHARLES COUNTY 186 42 22.6% 89 47.8% 19 10.2% 22 11.8%



GARRETT COUNTY 29 7 24.1% 10 34.5% 5 17.2% 6 20.7%

HARFORD COUNTY 164 50 30.5% 78 47.6% 5 3.0% 18 11.0%

HOWARD COUNTY 198 76 38.4% 33 16.7% 57 28.8% 12 6.1%

KENT COUNTY 21 12 57.1% 3 14.3% 0 0.0% 5 23.8%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

668 178 26.6% 137 20.5% 159 23.8% 56 8.4%


978 344 35.2% 380 38.9% 36 3.7% 80 8.2%


43 9 20.9% 19 44.2% 7 16.3% 3 7.0%


102 20 19.6% 46 45.1% 21 20.6% 6 5.9%

SOMERSET COUNTY 45 24 53.3% 7 15.6% 10 22.2% 2 4.4%

TALBOT COUNTY 45 11 24.4% 20 44.4% 6 13.3% 7 15.6%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

154 48 31.2% 66 42.9% 13 8.4% 20 13.0%

WICOMICO COUNTY 175 77 44.0% 63 36.0% 18 10.3% 15 8.6%


STATEWIDE OCTOBER 2016

6496 2431 37.4% 2322 35.7% 622 9.6% 604 9.3%

Nov-16

ALLEGANY COUNTY 96 25 26.0% 45 46.9% 4 4.2% 14 14.6%

21










ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

581 50 8.6% 373 64.2% 44 7.6% 84 14.5%

BALTIMORE CITY 1390 483 34.7% 554 39.9% 70 5.0% 185 13.3%


CALVERT COUNTY 96 7 7.3% 44 45.8% 29 30.2% 1 1.0%

CAROLINE COUNTY 42 1 2.4% 20 47.6% 7 16.7% 13 31.0%

CARROLL COUNTY 86 14 16.3% 51 59.3% 11 12.8% 9 10.5%

CECIL COUNTY 123 3 2.4% 54 43.9% 19 15.4% 25 20.3%

CHARLES COUNTY 159 37 23.3% 83 52.2% 14 8.8% 16 10.1%



GARRETT COUNTY 27 8 29.6% 11 40.7% 2 7.4% 2 7.4%

HARFORD COUNTY 148 44 29.7% 83 56.1% 4 2.7% 8 5.4%

HOWARD COUNTY 190 47 24.7% 45 23.7% 56 29.5% 20 10.5%

KENT COUNTY 16 0 0.0% 6 37.5% 1 6.3% 8 50.0%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

572 71 12.4% 138 24.1% 154 26.9% 85 14.9%


854 249 29.2% 364 42.6% 33 3.9% 76 8.9%


64 9 14.1% 20 31.3% 11 17.2% 13 20.3%


96 10 10.4% 50 52.1% 20 20.8% 7 7.3%

SOMERSET COUNTY 33 13 39.4% 7 21.2% 11 33.3% 1 3.0%

TALBOT COUNTY 49 7 14.3% 20 40.8% 6 12.2% 12 24.5%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

131 12 9.2% 71 54.2% 7 5.3% 28 21.4%

WICOMICO COUNTY 187 66 35.3% 74 39.6% 19 10.2% 18 9.6%


22










STATEWIDE NOVEMBER 2016

5912 1391 23.5% 2501 42.3% 609 10.3% 833 14.1%

Dec-16

ALLEGANY COUNTY 101 39 38.6% 38 37.6% 1 1.0% 18 17.8%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

560 77 13.8% 354 63.2% 38 6.8% 68 12.1%

BALTIMORE CITY 1340 471 35.1% 503 37.5% 74 5.5% 224 16.7%


CALVERT COUNTY 76 6 7.9% 18 23.7% 35 46.1% 7 9.2%

CAROLINE COUNTY 33 1 3.0% 7 21.2% 9 27.3% 16 48.5%

CARROLL COUNTY 88 14 15.9% 46 52.3% 14 15.9% 13 14.8%

CECIL COUNTY 107 9 8.4% 49 45.8% 16 15.0% 15 14.0%

CHARLES COUNTY 164 30 18.3% 77 47.0% 21 12.8% 20 12.2%



GARRETT COUNTY 26 6 23.1% 8 30.8% 3 11.5% 6 23.1%

HARFORD COUNTY 156 56 35.9% 83 53.2% 0 0.0% 6 3.8%

HOWARD COUNTY 167 54 32.3% 31 18.6% 45 26.9% 23 13.8%

KENT COUNTY 26 3 11.5% 5 19.2% 6 23.1% 12 46.2%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

556 65 11.7% 119 21.4% 152 27.3% 77 13.8%


870 261 30.0% 358 41.1% 32 3.7% 80 9.2%


37 3 8.1% 6 16.2% 3 8.1% 23 62.2%


110 16 14.5% 57 51.8% 20 18.2% 8 7.3%

SOMERSET COUNTY 26 6 23.1% 6 23.1% 8 30.8% 5 19.2%

TALBOT COUNTY 50 2 4.0% 23 46.0% 13 26.0% 12 24.0%

23










WASHINGTON COUNTY

118 15 12.7% 52 44.1% 10 8.5% 36 30.5%

WICOMICO COUNTY 183 62 33.9% 66 36.1% 28 15.3% 23 12.6%


STATEWIDE DECEMBER 2016

5833 1482 25.4% 2319 39.8% 610 10.5% 918 15.7%

Jan-17

ALLEGANY COUNTY 119 38 31.9% 51 42.9% 5 4.2% 15 12.6%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

696 93 13.4% 427 61.4% 36 5.2% 125 18.0%

BALTIMORE CITY 1699 567 33.4% 645 38.0% 93 5.5% 295 17.4%


CALVERT COUNTY 97 9 9.3% 30 30.9% 29 29.9% 9 9.3%

CAROLINE COUNTY 51 5 9.8% 20 39.2% 8 15.7% 12 23.5%

CARROLL COUNTY 77 2 2.6% 43 55.8% 16 20.8% 14 18.2%

CECIL COUNTY 156 13 8.3% 57 36.5% 24 15.4% 26 16.7%

CHARLES COUNTY 182 25 13.7% 78 42.9% 18 9.9% 30 16.5%



GARRETT COUNTY 19 5 26.3% 5 26.3% 5 26.3% 3 15.8%

HARFORD COUNTY 165 53 32.1% 84 50.9% 0 0.0% 14 8.5%

HOWARD COUNTY 158 29 18.4% 41 25.9% 44 27.8% 27 17.1%

KENT COUNTY 14 3 21.4% 4 28.6% 2 14.3% 3 21.4%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

619 77 12.4% 147 23.7% 176 28.4% 101 16.3%


964 343 35.6% 384 39.8% 25 2.6% 85 8.8%


49 17 34.7% 12 24.5% 2 4.1% 14 28.6%

24











115 19 16.5% 58 50.4% 22 19.1% 7 6.1%

SOMERSET COUNTY 26 12 46.2% 3 11.5% 9 34.6% 1 3.8%

TALBOT COUNTY 64 7 10.9% 25 39.1% 10 15.6% 18 28.1%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

148 24 16.2% 65 43.9% 15 10.1% 36 24.3%

WICOMICO COUNTY 148 37 25.0% 67 45.3% 18 12.2% 23 15.5%


STATEWIDE JANUARY 2017

6719 1657 24.7% 2655 39.5% 651 9.7% 1185 17.6%

Feb-17

ALLEGANY COUNTY 123 64 52.0% 38 30.9% 4 3.3% 10 8.1%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

658 100 15.2% 374 56.8% 58 8.8% 111 16.9%

BALTIMORE CITY 1639 536 32.7% 633 38.6% 94 5.7% 280 17.1%


CALVERT COUNTY 97 11 11.3% 34 35.1% 34 35.1% 5 5.2%

CAROLINE COUNTY 44 5 11.4% 19 43.2% 12 27.3% 8 18.2%

CARROLL COUNTY 101 9 8.9% 53 52.5% 15 14.9% 20 19.8%

CECIL COUNTY 158 17 10.8% 55 34.8% 27 17.1% 31 19.6%

CHARLES COUNTY 155 33 21.3% 76 49.0% 13 8.4% 15 9.7%



GARRETT COUNTY 20 5 25.0% 5 25.0% 3 15.0% 2 10.0%

HARFORD COUNTY 138 49 35.5% 67 48.6% 2 1.4% 15 10.9%

HOWARD COUNTY 154 29 18.8% 43 27.9% 53 34.4% 15 9.7%

KENT COUNTY 9 1 11.1% 3 33.3% 3 33.3% 2 22.2%

25










MONTGOMERY COUNTY

591 55 9.3% 152 25.7% 198 33.5% 71 12.0%


958 320 33.4% 386 40.3% 40 4.2% 91 9.5%


57 16 28.1% 13 22.8% 12 21.1% 13 22.8%


106 7 6.6% 50 47.2% 27 25.5% 8 7.5%

SOMERSET COUNTY 40 15 37.5% 11 27.5% 11 27.5% 2 5.0%

TALBOT COUNTY 42 3 7.1% 15 35.7% 12 28.6% 8 19.0%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

140 18 12.9% 66 47.1% 14 10.0% 32 22.9%

WICOMICO COUNTY 147 44 29.9% 43 29.3% 22 15.0% 33 22.4%


STATEWIDE FEBRUARY 2017

6469 1584 24.5% 2547 39.4% 757 11.7% 1050 16.2%

Mar-17

ALLEGANY COUNTY 135 48 35.6% 60 44.4% 5 3.7% 11 8.1%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

660 85 12.9% 393 59.5% 36 5.5% 127 19.2%

BALTIMORE CITY 1643 484 29.5% 604 36.8% 105 6.4% 350 21.3%


CALVERT COUNTY 117 7 6.0% 43 36.8% 42 35.9% 12 10.3%

CAROLINE COUNTY 64 2 3.1% 23 35.9% 11 17.2% 19 29.7%

CARROLL COUNTY 97 18 18.6% 25 25.8% 21 21.6% 30 30.9%

CECIL COUNTY 166 9 5.4% 65 39.2% 28 16.9% 28 16.9%

CHARLES COUNTY 187 16 8.6% 103 55.1% 23 12.3% 22 11.8%



26










GARRETT COUNTY 12 1 8.3% 6 50.0% 2 16.7% 2 16.7%

HARFORD COUNTY 183 50 27.3% 97 53.0% 7 3.8% 21 11.5%

HOWARD COUNTY 198 33 16.7% 67 33.8% 59 29.8% 26 13.1%

KENT COUNTY 13 2 15.4% 6 46.2% 1 7.7% 3 23.1%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

631 66 10.5% 150 23.8% 175 27.7% 80 12.7%


1024 310 30.3% 445 43.5% 37 3.6% 119 11.6%


47 14 29.8% 17 36.2% 2 4.3% 13 27.7%


115 4 3.5% 60 52.2% 22 19.1% 18 15.7%

SOMERSET COUNTY 25 9 36.0% 6 24.0% 8 32.0% 2 8.0%

TALBOT COUNTY 61 3 4.9% 25 41.0% 7 11.5% 20 32.8%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

153 15 9.8% 80 52.3% 10 6.5% 33 21.6%

WICOMICO COUNTY 181 62 34.3% 58 32.0% 27 14.9% 27 14.9%


STATEWIDE MARCH 2017

6881 1524 22.1% 2786 40.5% 709 10.3% 1261 18.3%

Apr-17

ALLEGANY COUNTY 115 41 35.7% 50 43.5% 1 0.9% 13 11.3%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

649 71 10.9% 405 62.4% 34 5.2% 119 18.3%

BALTIMORE CITY 1545 432 28.0% 581 37.6% 104 6.7% 353 22.8%


CALVERT COUNTY 94 6 6.4% 41 43.6% 27 28.7% 7 7.4%

CAROLINE COUNTY 36 0 0.0% 17 47.2% 7 19.4% 12 33.3%

CARROLL COUNTY 82 15 18.3% 35 42.7% 13 15.9% 14 17.1%

27










CECIL COUNTY 135 14 10.4% 49 36.3% 21 15.6% 18 13.3%

CHARLES COUNTY 167 37 22.2% 85 50.9% 9 5.4% 20 12.0%



GARRETT COUNTY 18 2 11.1% 9 50.0% 2 11.1% 3 16.7%

HARFORD COUNTY 166 45 27.1% 90 54.2% 1 0.6% 15 9.0%

HOWARD COUNTY 169 51 30.2% 42 24.9% 51 30.2% 12 7.1%

KENT COUNTY 12 1 8.3% 3 25.0% 5 41.7% 1 8.3%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

570 84 14.7% 143 25.1% 138 24.2% 79 13.9%


1002 332 33.1% 428 42.7% 32 3.2% 91 9.1%


51 12 23.5% 15 29.4% 9 17.6% 10 19.6%


89 12 13.5% 45 50.6% 16 18.0% 11 12.4%

SOMERSET COUNTY 38 16 42.1% 3 7.9% 12 31.6% 5 13.2%

TALBOT COUNTY 44 0 0.0% 18 40.9% 8 18.2% 16 36.4%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

146 15 10.3% 68 46.6% 16 11.0% 41 28.1%

WICOMICO COUNTY 201 83 41.3% 80 39.8% 17 8.5% 17 8.5%


STATEWIDE APRIL 2017

6458 1549 24.0% 2650 41.0% 601 9.3% 1141 17.7%

May-17

ALLEGANY COUNTY 117 42 35.9% 50 42.7% 1 0.9% 11 9.4%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

664 100 15.1% 386 58.1% 44 6.6% 120 18.1%

BALTIMORE CITY 1578 393 24.9% 614 38.9% 100 6.3% 394 25.0%

28











CALVERT COUNTY 111 5 4.5% 42 37.8% 34 30.6% 13 11.7%

CAROLINE COUNTY 57 1 1.8% 31 54.4% 7 12.3% 13 22.8%

CARROLL COUNTY 98 9 9.2% 48 49.0% 15 15.3% 25 25.5%

CECIL COUNTY 165 10 6.1% 66 40.0% 19 11.5% 37 22.4%

CHARLES COUNTY 214 29 13.6% 106 49.5% 23 10.7% 29 13.6%



GARRETT COUNTY 24 5 20.8% 6 25.0% 4 16.7% 4 16.7%

HARFORD COUNTY 192 51 26.6% 108 56.3% 4 2.1% 21 10.9%

HOWARD COUNTY 179 28 15.6% 57 31.8% 64 35.8% 17 9.5%

KENT COUNTY 29 8 27.6% 6 20.7% 4 13.8% 7 24.1%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

638 89 13.9% 161 25.2% 170 26.6% 73 11.4%


1030 336 32.6% 411 39.9% 58 5.6% 95 9.2%


50 8 16.0% 18 36.0% 12 24.0% 8 16.0%


110 6 5.5% 63 57.3% 23 20.9% 9 8.2%

SOMERSET COUNTY 80 41 51.3% 14 17.5% 15 18.8% 5 6.3%

TALBOT COUNTY 62 0 0.0% 28 45.2% 9 14.5% 17 27.4%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

175 16 9.1% 86 49.1% 15 8.6% 54 30.9%

WICOMICO COUNTY 193 49 25.4% 69 35.8% 32 16.6% 33 17.1%


STATEWIDE MAY 2017

7027 1507 21.4% 2876 40.9% 756 10.8% 1309 18.6%

Jun-17

29










ALLEGANY COUNTY 117 47 40.2% 51 43.6% 1 0.9% 13 11.1%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

682 62 9.1% 433 63.5% 59 8.7% 111 16.3%

BALTIMORE CITY 1743 459 26.3% 596 34.2% 107 6.1% 481 27.6%


CALVERT COUNTY 108 7 6.5% 41 38.0% 41 38.0% 9 8.3%

CAROLINE COUNTY 36 1 2.8% 13 36.1% 7 19.4% 13 36.1%

CARROLL COUNTY 101 8 7.9% 60 59.4% 16 15.8% 17 16.8%

CECIL COUNTY 148 5 3.4% 60 40.5% 26 17.6% 30 20.3%

CHARLES COUNTY 198 26 13.1% 100 50.5% 12 6.1% 41 20.7%



GARRETT COUNTY 19 6 31.6% 9 47.4% 2 10.5% 1 5.3%

HARFORD COUNTY 172 45 26.2% 99 57.6% 2 1.2% 13 7.6%

HOWARD COUNTY 225 53 23.6% 59 26.2% 77 34.2% 21 9.3%

KENT COUNTY 20 3 15.0% 4 20.0% 2 10.0% 8 40.0%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

663 66 10.0% 164 24.7% 173 26.1% 112 16.9%


1113 342 30.7% 486 43.7% 52 4.7% 94 8.4%


59 6 10.2% 17 28.8% 9 15.3% 15 25.4%


91 5 5.5% 59 64.8% 16 17.6% 5 5.5%

SOMERSET COUNTY 32 10 31.3% 4 12.5% 8 25.0% 10 31.3%

TALBOT COUNTY 83 4 4.8% 54 65.1% 7 8.4% 16 19.3%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

152 9 5.9% 73 48.0% 10 6.6% 54 35.5%

WICOMICO COUNTY 194 44 22.7% 87 44.8% 29 14.9% 30 15.5%

30











STATEWIDE JUNE 2017

7455 1487 19.9% 3140 42.1% 814 10.9% 1433 19.2%

Jul-17

ALLEGANY COUNTY 125 29 23.2% 53 42.4% 1 0.8% 28 22.4%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

692 68 9.8% 425 61.4% 41 5.9% 150 21.7%

BALTIMORE CITY 1649 298 18.1% 629 38.1% 85 5.2% 568 34.4%


CALVERT COUNTY 135 7 5.2% 62 45.9% 43 31.9% 14 10.4%

CAROLINE COUNTY 43 2 4.7% 18 41.9% 7 16.3% 14 32.6%

CARROLL COUNTY 113 20 17.7% 46 40.7% 19 16.8% 26 23.0%

CECIL COUNTY 127 4 3.1% 43 33.9% 19 15.0% 40 31.5%

CHARLES COUNTY 204 17 8.3% 108 52.9% 19 9.3% 45 22.1%



GARRETT COUNTY 29 3 10.3% 11 37.9% 7 24.1% 6 20.7%

HARFORD COUNTY 167 46 27.5% 95 56.9% 0 0.0% 20 12.0%

HOWARD COUNTY 207 36 17.4% 65 31.4% 62 30.0% 26 12.6%

KENT COUNTY 21 2 9.5% 4 19.0% 5 23.8% 9 42.9%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

661 40 6.1% 218 33.0% 171 25.9% 114 17.2%


1220 288 23.6% 579 47.5% 68 5.6% 150 12.3%


59 1 1.7% 17 28.8% 13 22.0% 15 25.4%


111 5 4.5% 68 61.3% 14 12.6% 20 18.0%

SOMERSET COUNTY 24 5 20.8% 8 33.3% 6 25.0% 3 12.5%

31










TALBOT COUNTY 53 5 9.4% 28 52.8% 10 18.9% 9 17.0%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

164 7 4.3% 92 56.1% 8 4.9% 52 31.7%

WICOMICO COUNTY 218 32 14.7% 103 47.2% 30 13.8% 33 15.1%


STATEWIDE JULY 2017

7493 1173 15.7% 3367 44.9% 762 10.2% 1685 22.5%

Aug-17

ALLEGANY COUNTY 130 47 36.2% 46 35.4% 3 2.3% 27 20.8%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

650 69 10.6% 376 57.8% 44 6.8% 149 22.9%

BALTIMORE CITY 1713 212 12.4% 664 38.8% 90 5.3% 672 39.2%


CALVERT COUNTY 105 4 3.8% 46 43.8% 41 39.0% 5 4.8%

CAROLINE COUNTY 42 1 2.4% 17 40.5% 6 14.3% 15 35.7%

CARROLL COUNTY 101 9 8.9% 58 57.4% 14 13.9% 20 19.8%

CECIL COUNTY 195 8 4.1% 82 42.1% 25 12.8% 42 21.5%

CHARLES COUNTY 155 21 13.5% 62 40.0% 19 12.3% 38 24.5%



GARRETT COUNTY 45 12 26.7% 14 31.1% 8 17.8% 6 13.3%

HARFORD COUNTY 171 44 25.7% 82 48.0% 3 1.8% 24 14.0%

HOWARD COUNTY 179 38 21.2% 61 34.1% 41 22.9% 33 18.4%

KENT COUNTY 18 0 0.0% 8 44.4% 1 5.6% 6 33.3%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

724 43 5.9% 231 31.9% 226 31.2% 131 18.1%


1041 251 24.1% 497 47.7% 42 4.0% 120 11.5%

32











51 3 5.9% 17 33.3% 10 19.6% 13 25.5%


105 3 2.9% 50 47.6% 21 20.0% 22 21.0%

SOMERSET COUNTY 38 9 23.7% 11 28.9% 10 26.3% 8 21.1%

TALBOT COUNTY 57 3 5.3% 21 36.8% 11 19.3% 19 33.3%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

183 10 5.5% 94 51.4% 17 9.3% 58 31.7%

WICOMICO COUNTY 208 39 18.8% 66 31.7% 37 17.8% 54 26.0%



7292 1127 15.5% 3035 41.6% 808 11.1% 1832 25.1%

Sep-17

ALLEGANY COUNTY 105 25 23.8% 44 41.9% 5 4.8% 26 24.8%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

658 77 11.7% 413 62.8% 38 5.8% 123 18.7%

BALTIMORE CITY 1548 186 12.0% 624 40.3% 100 6.5% 585 37.8%


CALVERT COUNTY 109 3 2.8% 43 39.4% 37 33.9% 14 12.8%

CAROLINE COUNTY 49 3 6.1% 14 28.6% 12 24.5% 17 34.7%

CARROLL COUNTY 73 4 5.5% 34 46.6% 15 20.5% 17 23.3%

CECIL COUNTY 165 7 4.2% 70 42.4% 19 11.5% 50 30.3%

CHARLES COUNTY 192 23 12.0% 85 44.3% 19 9.9% 53 27.6%



GARRETT COUNTY 41 13 31.7% 15 36.6% 6 14.6% 4 9.8%

HARFORD COUNTY 173 46 26.6% 89 51.4% 2 1.2% 20 11.6%

HOWARD COUNTY 167 35 21.0% 48 28.7% 54 32.3% 20 12.0%

33










KENT COUNTY 21 2 9.5% 10 47.6% 2 9.5% 6 28.6%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

646 39 6.0% 178 27.6% 174 26.9% 125 19.3%


1070 255 23.8% 535 50.0% 43 4.0% 118 11.0%


52 2 3.8% 18 34.6% 9 17.3% 17 32.7%


115 4 3.5% 64 55.7% 20 17.4% 18 15.7%

SOMERSET COUNTY 31 8 25.8% 7 22.6% 3 9.7% 13 41.9%

TALBOT COUNTY 48 4 8.3% 18 37.5% 4 8.3% 20 41.7%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

154 8 5.2% 97 63.0% 9 5.8% 37 24.0%

WICOMICO COUNTY 219 31 14.2% 76 34.7% 31 14.2% 71 32.4%



7001 1008 14.4% 3048 43.5% 731 10.4% 1760 25.1%

GRAND TOTAL JULY 2016-SEPTEMBER 2017

101,655 26,384 26.0% 40,527 39.9% 10,253 10.1% 16,448 16.2%

34

Table 2: Criminal Cases Pretrial Dispositions: Total Number and as a Percentage of Initial Appearances, July 2016-September 2017 by Jurisdiction: (1) Held on Default of Bond (Held on Cash Bail); (2) Released on Own Recognizance; (3) Released with Unsecured Personal Bond (non-monetary conditions); (4) Held Without Bail. County Number:

Total Initial Appearances









ALLEGANY COUNTY

1779 680 38.2% 694 39.0% 48 2.7% 216 12.1%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

9780 1771 18.1% 5698 58.3% 660 6.7% 1444 14.8%

BALTIMORE CITY

23646 7135 30.2% 8814 37.3% 1252 5.3% 5082 21.5%

BALTIMORE COUNTY

12177 4262 35.0% 3887 31.9% 764 6.3% 3090 25.4%

CALVERT COUNTY

1587 172 10.8% 550 34.7% 549 34.6% 105 6.6%

CAROLINE COUNTY

681 93 13.7% 249 36.6% 127 18.6% 169 24.8%

CARROLL COUNTY

1453 296 20.4% 642 44.2% 247 17.0% 241 16.6%

CECIL COUNTY 2278 308 13.5% 839 36.8% 334 14.7% 376 16.5%

CHARLES COUNTY

2645 453 17.1% 1303 49.3% 256 9.7% 380 14.4%

DORCHESTER COUNTY

913 233 25.5% 260 28.5% 157 17.2% 160 17.5%

FREDERICK COUNTY

2548 377 14.8% 1279 50.2% 341 13.4% 370 14.5%

GARRETT COUNTY

391 97 24.8% 137 35.0% 59 15.1% 49 12.5%

HARFORD COUNTY

2493 743 29.8% 1297 52.0% 40 1.6% 241 9.7%

35

County Number: Total Initial Appearances









HOWARD COUNTY

2719 713 26.2% 666 24.5% 826 30.4% 285 10.5%

KENT COUNTY 269 58 21.6% 76 28.3% 42 15.6% 70 26.0%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

9425 1552 16.5% 2341 24.8% 2468 26.2% 1193 12.7%


14974 4787 32.0% 6351 42.4% 567 3.8% 1371 9.2%


763 176 23.1% 227 29.8% 120 15.7% 164 21.5%


1594 185 11.6% 811 50.9% 303 19.0% 159 10.0%

SOMERSET COUNTY

558 233 41.8% 102 18.3% 146 26.2% 62 11.1%

TALBOT COUNTY

843 104 12.3% 369 43.8% 139 16.5% 185 21.9%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

2322 422 18.2% 1097 47.2% 181 7.8% 512 22.0%

WICOMICO COUNTY

2866 959 33.5% 1038 36.2% 364 12.7% 401 14.0%

WORCESTER COUNTY

2951 575 19.5% 1800 61.0% 263 8.9% 123 4.2%

STATEWIDE TOTALS

101,655 26,384 26.0% 40,527 39.9% 10,253 10.1% 16,448 16.2%

STATEWIDE AVERAGES JULY 2016-OCTOBER 2016

40.2% 35.4% 9.0% 7.5%

STATEWIDE AVERAGES NOVEMBER 2016-SEPTEMBER 2017

20.8% 41.5% 10.5% 19.3%

36

Table 3: Outcomes After Bail Review, Number and as a Percentage Of Initial Appearances, July 2016- September 2017, by Month And Jurisdiction.

Month/Year/County Total Initial Appearances

Total Bail Review Appearances (Defendant in Custody)

Total Held Without Bail after Bail Review

Percent Held Without Bail after Bail Review

Total Held on Default of Bond after Bail Review

Percent Held on Default of Bond after Bail Review

Total Released on Unsecured Personal Bond after Bail Review

Percent Released on Unsecured Bond after Bail Review

Total released on Own Recognizance after Bail Review

Percent Released on Own Recognizance after Bail Review

Jul-16

ALLEGANY COUNTY 118 54 1 0.8% 45 38.1% 0 0.0% 8 6.8%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

688 242 26 3.8% 180 26.2% 0 0.0% 36 5.2%

BALTIMORE CITY 1622 687 185 11.4% 447 27.6% 12 0.7% 43 2.7%

BALTIMORE COUNTY 832 417 70 8.4% 286 34.4% 2 0.2% 59 7.1%

CALVERT COUNTY 124 41 6 4.8% 24 19.4% 3 2.4% 8 6.5%

CAROLINE COUNTY 44 22 3 6.8% 9 20.5% 0 0.0% 10 22.7%

CARROLL COUNTY 123 35 4 3.3% 24 19.5% 5 4.1% 2 1.6%

CECIL COUNTY 169 65 1 0.6% 61 36.1% 0 0.0% 3 1.8%

CHARLES COUNTY 151 45 1 0.7% 40 26.5% 0 0.0% 4 2.6%

DORCHESTER COUNTY 90 50 3 3.3% 43 47.8% 1 1.1% 3 3.3%

FREDERICK COUNTY 163 53 3 1.8% 45 27.6% 2 1.2% 3 1.8%

GARRETT COUNTY 28 8 0 0.0% 6 21.4% 2 7.1% 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY 143 55 13 9.1% 33 23.1% 0 0.0% 9 6.3%

HOWARD COUNTY 164 51 6 3.7% 37 22.6% 8 4.9% 0 0.0%

KENT COUNTY 19 7 2 10.5% 5 26.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

634 265 19 3.0% 167 26.3% 78 12.3% 1 0.2%


1050 351 62 5.9% 274 26.1% 1 0.1% 14 1.3%


41 8 2 4.9% 5 12.2% 0 0.0% 1 2.4%

SAINT MARY’S COUNTY 117 46 12 10.3% 21 17.9% 0 0.0% 13 11.1%

37











SOMERSET COUNTY 38 18 3 7.9% 12 31.6% 0 0.0% 3 7.9%

TALBOT COUNTY 66 19 0 0.0% 17 25.8% 0 0.0% 2 3.0%

WASHINGTON COUNTY 161 63 2 1.2% 56 34.8% 2 1.2% 3 1.9%

WICOMICO COUNTY 221 104 6 2.7% 68 30.8% 4 1.8% 26 11.8%

WORCESTER COUNTY 364 82 3 0.8% 69 19.0% 1 0.3% 9 2.5%

STATEWIDE JULY 2016

7170 2788 433 6.0% 1974 27.5% 121 1.7% 260 3.6%

Aug-16

ALLEGANY COUNTY 126 68 1 0.8% 56 44.4% 0 0.0% 11 8.7%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

661 251 16 2.4% 202 30.6% 0 0.0% 33 5.0%

BALTIMORE CITY 1517 656 169 11.1% 454 29.9% 7 0.5% 26 1.7%


CALVERT COUNTY 102 37 3 2.9% 27 26.5% 0 0.0% 7 6.9%

CAROLINE COUNTY 56 31 5 8.9% 14 25.0% 0 0.0% 12 21.4%

CARROLL COUNTY 109 46 15 13.8% 24 22.0% 4 3.7% 3 2.8%

CECIL COUNTY 144 66 2 1.4% 63 43.8% 0 0.0% 1 0.7%

CHARLES COUNTY 155 58 4 2.6% 49 31.6% 0 0.0% 5 3.2%



GARRETT COUNTY 31 8 0 0.0% 6 19.4% 2 6.5% 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY 171 62 10 5.8% 43 25.1% 0 0.0% 9 5.3%

HOWARD COUNTY 165 54 6 3.6% 41 24.8% 4 2.4% 3 1.8%

KENT COUNTY 13 6 0 0.0% 5 38.5% 0 0.0% 1 7.7%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

603 253 20 3.3% 140 23.2% 91 15.1% 2 0.3%

38












927 333 49 5.3% 264 28.5% 4 0.4% 16 1.7%


55 11 1 1.8% 9 16.4% 0 0.0% 1 1.8%


SOMERSET COUNTY 38 18 1 2.6% 12 31.6% 0 0.0% 5 13.2%

TALBOT COUNTY 52 15 0 0.0% 11 21.2% 3 5.8% 1 1.9%


WICOMICO COUNTY 203 105 7 3.4% 76 37.4% 2 1.0% 20 9.9%



6753 2764 409 6.1% 1998 29.6% 123 1.8% 234 3.5%

Sep-16

ALLEGANY COUNTY 140 71 0 0.0% 67 47.9% 0 0.0% 4 2.9%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

661 229 21 3.2% 185 28.0% 0 0.0% 23 3.5%

BALTIMORE CITY 1552 614 154 9.9% 407 26.2% 22 1.4% 31 2.0%


CALVERT COUNTY 122 43 5 4.1% 24 19.7% 7 5.7% 7 5.7%

CAROLINE COUNTY 39 14 3 7.7% 4 10.3% 0 0.0% 7 17.9%

CARROLL COUNTY 92 30 6 6.5% 24 26.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CECIL COUNTY 176 93 2 1.1% 84 47.7% 0 0.0% 7 4.0%

CHARLES COUNTY 176 54 6 3.4% 33 18.8% 0 0.0% 15 8.5%



GARRETT COUNTY 23 13 1 4.3% 12 52.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY 184 59 14 7.6% 37 20.1% 0 0.0% 8 4.3%

39











HOWARD COUNTY 199 65 8 4.0% 47 23.6% 9 4.5% 1 0.5%

KENT COUNTY 17 7 0 0.0% 7 41.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

649 242 17 2.6% 154 23.7% 71 10.9% 0 0.0%


873 289 47 5.4% 230 26.3% 2 0.2% 10 1.1%


48 16 8 16.7% 8 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%


SOMERSET COUNTY 44 23 1 2.3% 17 38.6% 0 0.0% 5 11.4%

TALBOT COUNTY 67 20 2 3.0% 18 26.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%


WICOMICO COUNTY 188 83 5 2.7% 62 33.0% 4 2.1% 12 6.4%



6696 2555 388 5.8% 1872 28.0% 121 1.8% 174 2.6%

Oct-16

ALLEGANY COUNTY 112 47 0 0.0% 44 39.3% 1 0.9% 2 1.8%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

620 205 22 3.5% 156 25.2% 0 0.0% 27 4.4%

BALTIMORE CITY 1468 600 155 10.6% 371 25.3% 18 1.2% 56 3.8%


CALVERT COUNTY 94 33 5 5.3% 17 18.1% 4 4.3% 7 7.4%

CAROLINE COUNTY 45 19 1 2.2% 10 22.2% 0 0.0% 8 17.8%

CARROLL COUNTY 112 38 12 10.7% 20 17.9% 6 5.4% 0 0.0%

CECIL COUNTY 144 69 1 0.7% 66 45.8% 0 0.0% 2 1.4%

CHARLES COUNTY 186 77 20 10.8% 34 18.3% 0 0.0% 23 12.4%

40













GARRETT COUNTY 29 13 4 13.8% 9 31.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY 164 69 25 15.2% 25 15.2% 0 0.0% 19 11.6%

HOWARD COUNTY 198 66 11 5.6% 47 23.7% 7 3.5% 1 0.5%

KENT COUNTY 21 16 2 9.5% 14 66.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

668 277 34 5.1% 162 24.3% 81 12.1% 0 0.0%


978 305 49 5.0% 230 23.5% 3 0.3% 23 2.4%


43 9 3 7.0% 6 14.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%


SOMERSET COUNTY 45 19 3 6.7% 14 31.1% 1 2.2% 1 2.2%

TALBOT COUNTY 45 15 3 6.7% 10 22.2% 1 2.2% 1 2.2%


WICOMICO COUNTY 175 80 11 6.3% 60 34.3% 3 1.7% 6 3.4%



6496 2526 447 6.9% 1682 25.9% 132 2.0% 265 4.1%

Nov-16

ALLEGANY COUNTY 96 40 2 2.1% 33 34.4% 3 3.1% 2 2.1%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

581 156 40 6.9% 93 16.0% 1 0.2% 22 3.8%

BALTIMORE CITY 1390 495 207 14.9% 201 14.5% 15 1.1% 72 5.2%


CALVERT COUNTY 96 24 7 7.3% 6 6.3% 4 4.2% 7 7.3%

41











CAROLINE COUNTY 42 13 4 9.5% 2 4.8% 0 0.0% 7 16.7%

CARROLL COUNTY 86 16 11 12.8% 3 3.5% 1 1.2% 1 1.2%

CECIL COUNTY 123 45 3 2.4% 39 31.7% 0 0.0% 3 2.4%

CHARLES COUNTY 159 57 7 4.4% 34 21.4% 1 0.6% 15 9.4%



GARRETT COUNTY 27 7 1 3.7% 5 18.5% 1 3.7% 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY 148 36 16 10.8% 9 6.1% 0 0.0% 11 7.4%

HOWARD COUNTY 190 64 16 8.4% 37 19.5% 8 4.2% 3 1.6%

KENT COUNTY 16 9 3 18.8% 3 18.8% 0 0.0% 3 18.8%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

572 226 47 8.2% 82 14.3% 97 17.0% 0 0.0%


854 260 55 6.4% 187 21.9% 6 0.7% 12 1.4%


64 28 7 10.9% 17 26.6% 0 0.0% 4 6.3%


SOMERSET COUNTY 33 10 2 6.1% 6 18.2% 0 0.0% 2 6.1%

TALBOT COUNTY 49 17 2 4.1% 12 24.5% 1 2.0% 2 4.1%


WICOMICO COUNTY 187 80 15 8.0% 42 22.5% 4 2.1% 19 10.2%



5912 2040 543 9.2% 1035 17.5% 150 2.5% 312 5.3%

Dec-16

ALLEGANY COUNTY 101 52 0 0.0% 43 42.6% 0 0.0% 9 8.9%

42











ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

560 146 26 4.6% 98 17.5% 0 0.0% 22 3.9%

BALTIMORE CITY 1340 530 226 16.9% 186 13.9% 19 1.4% 99 7.4%


CALVERT COUNTY 76 25 9 11.8% 5 6.6% 4 5.3% 7 9.2%

CAROLINE COUNTY 33 18 6 18.2% 3 9.1% 0 0.0% 9 27.3%

CARROLL COUNTY 88 22 13 14.8% 8 9.1% 1 1.1% 0 0.0%

CECIL COUNTY 107 24 3 2.8% 19 17.8% 0 0.0% 2 1.9%

CHARLES COUNTY 164 55 6 3.7% 28 17.1% 0 0.0% 21 12.8%



GARRETT COUNTY 26 13 4 15.4% 8 30.8% 0 0.0% 1 3.8%

HARFORD COUNTY 156 46 25 16.0% 10 6.4% 0 0.0% 11 7.1%

HOWARD COUNTY 167 60 8 4.8% 41 24.6% 10 6.0% 1 0.6%

KENT COUNTY 26 16 8 30.8% 4 15.4% 0 0.0% 4 15.4%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

556 216 47 8.5% 89 16.0% 78 14.0% 2 0.4%


870 240 56 6.4% 165 19.0% 4 0.5% 15 1.7%


37 20 8 21.6% 11 29.7% 0 0.0% 1 2.7%


SOMERSET COUNTY 26 6 4 15.4% 2 7.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

TALBOT COUNTY 50 17 1 2.0% 13 26.0% 0 0.0% 3 6.0%


WICOMICO COUNTY 183 71 17 9.3% 41 22.4% 1 0.5% 12 6.6%


43












5833 2055 605 10.4% 1012 17.3% 126 2.2% 312 5.3%

Jan-17

ALLEGANY COUNTY 119 60 3 2.5% 46 38.7% 0 0.0% 11 9.2%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

696 212 64 9.2% 108 15.5% 0 0.0% 40 5.7%

BALTIMORE CITY 1699 652 296 17.4% 209 12.3% 47 2.8% 100 5.9%


CALVERT COUNTY 97 34 11 11.3% 10 10.3% 3 3.1% 10 10.3%

CAROLINE COUNTY 51 18 4 7.8% 5 9.8% 1 2.0% 8 15.7%

CARROLL COUNTY 77 16 8 10.4% 3 3.9% 5 6.5% 0 0.0%

CECIL COUNTY 156 62 5 3.2% 52 33.3% 1 0.6% 4 2.6%

CHARLES COUNTY 182 68 16 8.8% 32 17.6% 0 0.0% 20 11.0%



GARRETT COUNTY 19 9 2 10.5% 6 31.6% 1 5.3% 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY 165 57 26 15.8% 22 13.3% 0 0.0% 9 5.5%

HOWARD COUNTY 158 53 17 10.8% 23 14.6% 11 7.0% 2 1.3%

KENT COUNTY 14 8 4 28.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 28.6%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

619 245 79 12.8% 97 15.7% 68 11.0% 1 0.2%


964 282 67 7.0% 191 19.8% 5 0.5% 19 2.0%


49 13 8 16.3% 4 8.2% 0 0.0% 1 2.0%


SOMERSET COUNTY 26 11 2 7.7% 6 23.1% 0 0.0% 3 11.5%

44











TALBOT COUNTY 64 28 2 3.1% 19 29.7% 2 3.1% 5 7.8%


WICOMICO COUNTY 148 54 11 7.4% 34 23.0% 0 0.0% 9 6.1%



6719 2483 852 12.7% 1063 15.8% 166 2.5% 402 6.0%

Feb-17

ALLEGANY COUNTY 123 66 4 3.3% 43 35.0% 0 0.0% 19 15.4%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

658 178 57 8.7% 97 14.7% 0 0.0% 24 3.6%

BALTIMORE CITY 1639 632 298 18.2% 229 14.0% 36 2.2% 69 4.2%


CALVERT COUNTY 97 26 7 7.2% 10 10.3% 3 3.1% 6 6.2%

CAROLINE COUNTY 44 12 4 9.1% 2 4.5% 0 0.0% 6 13.6%

CARROLL COUNTY 101 26 15 14.9% 6 5.9% 2 2.0% 3 3.0%

CECIL COUNTY 158 74 13 8.2% 52 32.9% 1 0.6% 8 5.1%

CHARLES COUNTY 155 49 4 2.6% 34 21.9% 0 0.0% 11 7.1%



GARRETT COUNTY 20 6 1 5.0% 5 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY 138 55 19 13.8% 20 14.5% 1 0.7% 15 10.9%

HOWARD COUNTY 154 34 13 8.4% 17 11.0% 3 1.9% 1 0.6%

KENT COUNTY 9 3 1 11.1% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 1 11.1%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

591 191 54 9.1% 63 10.7% 74 12.5% 0 0.0%


958 278 66 6.9% 184 19.2% 2 0.2% 26 2.7%

45












57 15 8 14.0% 7 12.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%


SOMERSET COUNTY 40 14 1 2.5% 11 27.5% 0 0.0% 2 5.0%

TALBOT COUNTY 42 15 3 7.1% 9 21.4% 2 4.8% 1 2.4%


WICOMICO COUNTY 147 68 20 13.6% 32 21.8% 0 0.0% 16 10.9%



6469 2283 796 12.3% 996 15.4% 143 2.2% 348 5.4%

Mar-17

ALLEGANY COUNTY 135 51 3 2.2% 32 23.7% 0 0.0% 16 11.9%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

660 187 58 8.8% 94 14.2% 0 0.0% 35 5.3%

BALTIMORE CITY 1643 650 330 20.1% 201 12.2% 33 2.0% 86 5.2%


CALVERT COUNTY 117 31 2 1.7% 15 12.8% 9 7.7% 5 4.3%

CAROLINE COUNTY 64 28 10 15.6% 6 9.4% 0 0.0% 12 18.8%

CARROLL COUNTY 97 39 21 21.6% 12 12.4% 3 3.1% 3 3.1%

CECIL COUNTY 166 57 8 4.8% 46 27.7% 1 0.6% 2 1.2%

CHARLES COUNTY 187 50 9 4.8% 31 16.6% 0 0.0% 10 5.3%



GARRETT COUNTY 12 4 1 8.3% 3 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY 183 50 26 14.2% 16 8.7% 2 1.1% 6 3.3%

HOWARD COUNTY 198 54 16 8.1% 27 13.6% 10 5.1% 1 0.5%

46











KENT COUNTY 13 5 0 0.0% 2 15.4% 0 0.0% 3 23.1%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

631 238 63 10.0% 96 15.2% 79 12.5% 0 0.0%


1024 290 88 8.6% 182 17.8% 3 0.3% 17 1.7%


47 19 11 23.4% 8 17.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%


SOMERSET COUNTY 25 9 2 8.0% 4 16.0% 0 0.0% 3 12.0%

TALBOT COUNTY 61 27 2 3.3% 17 27.9% 2 3.3% 6 9.8%


WICOMICO COUNTY 181 76 32 17.7% 28 15.5% 1 0.6% 15 8.3%



6881 2442 894 13.0% 1057 15.4% 161 2.3% 330 4.8%

Apr-17

ALLEGANY COUNTY 115 44 3 2.6% 32 27.8% 0 0.0% 9 7.8%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

649 174 57 8.8% 76 11.7% 0 0.0% 41 6.3%

BALTIMORE CITY 1545 611 289 18.7% 192 12.4% 24 1.6% 106 6.9%


CALVERT COUNTY 94 22 6 6.4% 12 12.8% 0 0.0% 4 4.3%

CAROLINE COUNTY 36 12 5 13.9% 1 2.8% 0 0.0% 6 16.7%

CARROLL COUNTY 82 21 14 17.1% 5 6.1% 1 1.2% 1 1.2%

CECIL COUNTY 135 61 7 5.2% 51 37.8% 1 0.7% 2 1.5%

CHARLES COUNTY 167 54 8 4.8% 36 21.6% 0 0.0% 10 6.0%


47












GARRETT COUNTY 18 7 1 5.6% 5 27.8% 1 5.6% 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY 166 47 22 13.3% 19 11.4% 0 0.0% 6 3.6%

HOWARD COUNTY 169 50 8 4.7% 32 18.9% 9 5.3% 1 0.6%

KENT COUNTY 12 3 0 0.0% 3 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

570 219 58 10.2% 76 13.3% 83 14.6% 2 0.4%


1002 283 81 8.1% 181 18.1% 1 0.1% 20 2.0%


51 13 9 17.6% 3 5.9% 0 0.0% 1 2.0%


SOMERSET COUNTY 38 17 4 10.5% 11 28.9% 0 0.0% 2 5.3%

TALBOT COUNTY 44 16 0 0.0% 6 13.6% 3 6.8% 7 15.9%


WICOMICO COUNTY 201 83 26 12.9% 35 17.4% 3 1.5% 19 9.5%



6458 2307 778 12.0% 1041 16.1% 137 2.1% 351 5.4%

May-17

ALLEGANY COUNTY 117 52 1 0.9% 32 27.4% 11 9.4% 8 6.8%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

664 199 53 8.0% 82 12.3% 0 0.0% 64 9.6%

BALTIMORE CITY 1578 635 351 22.2% 176 11.2% 18 1.1% 90 5.7%


CALVERT COUNTY 111 34 4 3.6% 13 11.7% 4 3.6% 13 11.7%

CAROLINE COUNTY 57 20 4 7.0% 6 10.5% 0 0.0% 10 17.5%

48











CARROLL COUNTY 98 30 14 14.3% 3 3.1% 7 7.1% 6 6.1%

CECIL COUNTY 165 75 23 13.9% 48 29.1% 1 0.6% 3 1.8%

CHARLES COUNTY 214 58 10 4.7% 37 17.3% 0 0.0% 11 5.1%



GARRETT COUNTY 24 12 3 12.5% 7 29.2% 0 0.0% 2 8.3%

HARFORD COUNTY 192 55 25 13.0% 19 9.9% 0 0.0% 11 5.7%

HOWARD COUNTY 179 40 9 5.0% 22 12.3% 6 3.4% 3 1.7%

KENT COUNTY 29 16 8 27.6% 3 10.3% 3 10.3% 2 6.9%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

638 233 79 12.4% 79 12.4% 75 11.8% 0 0.0%


1030 329 26 2.5% 206 20.0% 4 0.4% 33 3.2%


50 11 1 2.0% 7 14.0% 0 0.0% 3 6.0%


SOMERSET COUNTY 80 28 10 12.5% 17 21.3% 0 0.0% 1 1.3%

TALBOT COUNTY 62 26 2 3.2% 14 22.6% 6 9.7% 4 6.5%


WICOMICO COUNTY 193 69 26 13.5% 31 16.1% 0 0.0% 12 6.2%


STATEWIDE MAY 2017

7027 2543 797 11.3% 1042 14.8% 157 2.2% 487 6.9%

Jun-17

ALLEGANY COUNTY 117 53 7 6.0% 33 28.2% 2 1.7% 11 9.4%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

682 178 65 9.5% 78 11.4% 5 0.7% 30 4.4%

49











BALTIMORE CITY 1743 777 399 22.9% 238 13.7% 21 1.2% 119 6.8%


CALVERT COUNTY 108 24 5 4.6% 5 4.6% 0 0.0% 14 13.0%

CAROLINE COUNTY 36 14 7 19.4% 0 0.0% 1 2.8% 6 16.7%

CARROLL COUNTY 101 26 15 14.9% 2 2.0% 5 5.0% 4 4.0%

CECIL COUNTY 148 54 9 6.1% 39 26.4% 3 2.0% 3 2.0%

CHARLES COUNTY 198 15 0 0.0% 12 6.1% 0 0.0% 3 1.5%



GARRETT COUNTY 19 5 1 5.3% 4 21.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY 172 38 18 10.5% 10 5.8% 0 0.0% 10 5.8%

HOWARD COUNTY 225 64 20 8.9% 28 12.4% 12 5.3% 4 1.8%

KENT COUNTY 20 12 3 15.0% 2 10.0% 3 15.0% 4 20.0%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

663 266 101 15.2% 61 9.2% 104 15.7% 0 0.0%


1113 302 79 7.1% 186 16.7% 8 0.7% 29 2.6%


59 10 5 8.5% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 4 6.8%


SOMERSET COUNTY 32 15 4 12.5% 5 15.6% 0 0.0% 6 18.8%

TALBOT COUNTY 83 20 5 6.0% 5 6.0% 4 4.8% 6 7.2%


WICOMICO COUNTY 194 66 25 12.9% 25 12.9% 0 0.0% 16 8.2%


STATEWIDE JUNE 2017

7455 2577 967 13.0% 994 13.3% 207 2.8% 409 5.5%

50











Jul-17

ALLEGANY COUNTY 125 64 2 1.6% 50 40.0% 1 0.8% 11 8.8%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

692 198 77 11.1% 47 6.8% 3 0.4% 71 10.3%

BALTIMORE CITY 1649 772 156 9.5% 143 8.7% 24 1.5% 149 9.0%


CALVERT COUNTY 135 29 9 6.7% 15 11.1% 0 0.0% 5 3.7%

CAROLINE COUNTY 43 18 3 7.0% 6 14.0% 0 0.0% 9 20.9%

CARROLL COUNTY 113 42 29 25.7% 3 2.7% 9 8.0% 1 0.9%

CECIL COUNTY 127 54 12 9.4% 33 26.0% 3 2.4% 6 4.7%

CHARLES COUNTY 204 2 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 1 0.5% 0 0.0%



GARRETT COUNTY 29 10 3 10.3% 4 13.8% 1 3.4% 2 6.9%

HARFORD COUNTY 167 50 35 21.0% 4 2.4% 0 0.0% 11 6.6%

HOWARD COUNTY 207 58 18 8.7% 24 11.6% 12 5.8% 4 1.9%

KENT COUNTY 21 12 9 42.9% 2 9.5% 1 4.8% 0 0.0%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

661 226 95 14.4% 51 7.7% 79 12.0% 1 0.2%


1220 323 123 10.1% 178 14.6% 2 0.2% 20 1.6%


59 18 4 6.8% 10 16.9% 0 0.0% 4 6.8%


SOMERSET COUNTY 24 9 1 4.2% 6 25.0% 0 0.0% 2 8.3%

TALBOT COUNTY 53 10 3 5.7% 4 7.5% 0 0.0% 3 5.7%


51











WICOMICO COUNTY 218 64 31 14.2% 27 12.4% 1 0.5% 5 2.3%


STATEWIDE JULY 2017

7493 2569 843 11.3% 800 10.7% 169 2.3% 457 6.1%

Aug-17

ALLEGANY COUNTY 130 75 5 3.8% 62 47.7% 1 0.8% 7 5.4%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

650 187 78 12.0% 64 9.8% 0 0.0% 45 6.9%

BALTIMORE CITY 1713 828 475 27.7% 135 7.9% 24 1.4% 194 11.3%


CALVERT COUNTY 105 14 3 2.9% 2 1.9% 2 1.9% 7 6.7%

CAROLINE COUNTY 42 18 2 4.8% 3 7.1% 0 0.0% 13 31.0%

CARROLL COUNTY 101 27 16 15.8% 5 5.0% 3 3.0% 3 3.0%

CECIL COUNTY 195 76 10 5.1% 51 26.2% 8 4.1% 7 3.6%

CHARLES COUNTY 155 0 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%



GARRETT COUNTY 45 21 4 8.9% 13 28.9% 4 8.9% 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY 171 60 26 15.2% 21 12.3% 0 0.0% 13 7.6%

HOWARD COUNTY 179 59 19 10.6% 23 12.8% 11 6.1% 6 3.4%

KENT COUNTY 18 8 5 27.8% 2 11.1% 1 5.6% 0 0.0%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

724 229 94 13.0% 57 7.9% 76 10.5% 2 0.3%


1041 296 82 7.9% 175 16.8% 11 1.1% 28 2.7%


51 22 7 13.7% 10 19.6% 0 0.0% 5 9.8%

52












SOMERSET COUNTY 38 15 6 15.8% 7 18.4% 0 0.0% 2 5.3%

TALBOT COUNTY 57 19 6 10.5% 6 10.5% 1 1.8% 6 10.5%


WICOMICO COUNTY 208 85 44 21.2% 23 11.1% 2 1.0% 16 7.7%



7292 2671 1122 15.4% 851 11.7% 148 2.0% 550 7.5%

Sep-17

ALLEGANY COUNTY 105 46 9 8.6% 29 27.6% 0 0.0% 8 7.6%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

658 174 65 9.9% 72 10.9% 0 0.0% 37 5.6%

BALTIMORE CITY 1548 701 419 27.1% 117 7.6% 28 1.8% 137 8.9%


CALVERT COUNTY 109 18 7 6.4% 7 6.4% 0 0.0% 4 3.7%

CAROLINE COUNTY 49 20 5 10.2% 5 10.2% 2 4.1% 8 16.3%

CARROLL COUNTY 73 21 8 11.0% 6 8.2% 5 6.8% 2 2.7%

CECIL COUNTY 165 62 20 12.1% 37 22.4% 4 2.4% 1 0.6%

CHARLES COUNTY 192 16 8 4.2% 5 2.6% 0 0.0% 3 1.6%



GARRETT COUNTY 41 16 1 2.4% 15 36.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY 173 47 22 12.7% 9 5.2% 0 0.0% 16 9.2%

HOWARD COUNTY 167 42 10 6.0% 18 10.8% 11 6.6% 3 1.8%

KENT COUNTY 21 8 3 14.3% 1 4.8% 3 14.3% 1 4.8%

53











MONTGOMERY COUNTY

646 244 81 12.5% 71 11.0% 92 14.2% 0 0.0%


1070 260 77 7.2% 150 14.0% 2 0.2% 31 2.9%


52 19 12 23.1% 6 11.5% 0 0.0% 1 1.9%


SOMERSET COUNTY 31 21 15 48.4% 5 16.1% 0 0.0% 1 3.2%

TALBOT COUNTY 48 21 9 18.8% 8 16.7% 1 2.1% 3 6.3%


WICOMICO COUNTY 219 99 53 24.2% 27 12.3% 2 0.9% 17 7.8%



7,001 2,438 1,052 15.0% 799 11.4% 154 2.2% 433 6.2%


101,655 37,041 10,926 10.7% 18,216 17.9% 2,215 2.2% 5,324 5.2%

54

Table 4: Outcomes After Bail Review, Number and as a Percentage Of Initial Appearances, July 2016- September 2017, All Months by Jurisdiction.

COUNTY Total Initial Appearances










July 2016 to September 2017

ALLEGANY COUNTY 1779 843 41 2.3% 647 36.4% 19 1.1% 136 7.6%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY 9780 2916 725 7.4% 1632 16.7% 9 0.1% 550 5.6%

BALTIMORE CITY 23646 9840 4109 17.4% 3706 15.7% 348 1.5% 1377 5.8%


CALVERT COUNTY 1587 435 89 5.6% 192 12.1% 43 2.7% 111 7.0%

CAROLINE COUNTY 681 277 66 9.7% 76 11.2% 4 0.6% 131 19.2%

CARROLL COUNTY 1453 435 201 13.8% 148 10.2% 57 3.9% 29 2.0%

CECIL COUNTY 2278 937 119 5.2% 741 32.5% 23 1.0% 54 2.4%

CHARLES COUNTY 2645 658 99 3.7% 406 15.3% 2 0.1% 151 5.7%



GARRETT COUNTY 391 152 27 6.9% 108 27.6% 12 3.1% 5 1.3%

HARFORD COUNTY 2493 786 322 12.9% 297 11.9% 3 0.1% 164 6.6%

HOWARD COUNTY 2719 814 185 6.8% 464 17.1% 131 4.8% 34 1.3%

KENT COUNTY 269 136 48 17.8% 54 20.1% 11 4.1% 23 8.6%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY 9425 3570 888 9.4% 1445 15.3% 1226 13.0% 11 0.1%

PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY 14974 4421 1007 6.7% 2983 19.9% 58 0.4% 313 2.1%

QUEEN ANNE’S COUNTY 763 232 94 12.3% 112 14.7% 0 0.0% 26 3.4%


SOMERSET COUNTY 558 233 59 10.6% 135 24.2% 1 0.2% 38 6.8%

TALBOT COUNTY 843 285 40 4.7% 169 20.0% 26 3.1% 50 5.9%

55

COUNTY Total Initial Appearances











WICOMICO COUNTY 2866 1187 329 11.5% 611 21.3% 27 0.9% 220 7.7%


STATEWIDE TOTALS 101,655 37,041 10,926 10.7% 18216 17.9% 2215 2.2% 5324 5.2%


6.2% 27.8% 1.8% 3.4%

STATEWIDE AVERAGES NOVEMBER 2016 -SEPTEMBER 2017

12.4% 14.3% 2.3% 5.9%

56

Table 5: Failure to Appear Rates, Criminal Cases: July 2016-September 2017 by Month and Jurisdiction, Number and Percentage of Defendants that Fail to Appear (as a percentage of Initial Appearances):

County/Mo./Yr. Total Initial Appear

Total: Failure to Appear

% of Initial Appearances: Failure to Appear

Total Held in Default of Bond

Total Failure to Appear: Held on Default of Bond

% Failed to Appear of Initial Appearances: Held on Default of Bond

Total: Released on Own Recognizance

Total Failed to Appear: Released on Own Recognizance

% Failed to Appear of Initial Appearances: Released on Own Recognizance

Total Released on Unsecured Personal Bond

Total Failure to Appear: Released on Unsecured Personal Bond

% Failed to Appear of Initial Appearances: Released on Unsecured Bond

Jul-16 ALLEGANY COUNTY

118 11 9.3% 74 8 6.8% 37 3 2.5% 4 0 0.0%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

688 89 12.9% 262 21 3.1% 347 63 9.2% 48 5 0.7%

BALTIMORE CITY

1622 120 7.4% 811 21 1.3% 560 92 5.7% 62 7 0.4%

BALTIMORE COUNTY

832 82 9.9% 520 49 5.9% 196 27 3.2% 43 6 0.7%

CALVERT COUNTY

124 0 0.0% 45 0 0.0% 44 0 0.0% 32 0 0.0%

CAROLINE COUNTY

44 1 2.3% 24 0 0.0% 7 0 0.0% 6 1 2.3%

CARROLL COUNTY

123 7 5.7% 40 2 1.6% 53 2 1.6% 24 3 2.4%

CECIL COUNTY 169 19 11.2% 75 5 3.0% 55 9 5.3% 32 5 3.0% CHARLES COUNTY

151 0 0.0% 46 0 0.0% 79 0 0.0% 16 0 0.0%

DORCHESTER COUNTY

90 0 0.0% 62 0 0.0% 11 0 0.0% 14 0 0.0%

FREDERICK COUNTY

163 28 17.2% 58 8 4.9% 88 18 11.0% 11 2 1.2%

GARRETT COUNTY

28 1 3.6% 13 0 0.0% 12 1 3.6% 1 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY

143 12 8.4% 61 2 1.4% 68 9 6.3% 3 1 0.7%

HOWARD COUNTY

164 15 9.1% 79 4 2.4% 29 4 2.4% 50 7 4.3%

KENT COUNTY 19 2 10.5% 7 0 0.0% 10 1 5.3% 2 1 5.3%

57













MONTGOMERY COUNTY

634 79 12.5% 346 21 3.3% 130 29 4.6% 123 29 4.6%


1050 141 13.4% 541 38 3.6% 425 98 9.3% 20 5 0.5%


41 1 2.4% 16 0 0.0% 16 1 2.4% 8 0 0.0%


117 0 0.0% 41 0 0.0% 47 0 0.0% 19 0 0.0%

SOMERSET COUNTY

38 0 0.0% 19 0 0.0% 5 0 0.0% 12 0 0.0%

TALBOT COUNTY

66 3 4.5% 20 0 0.0% 28 2 3.0% 16 1 1.5%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

161 17 10.6% 80 2 1.2% 60 14 8.7% 13 1 0.6%

WICOMICO COUNTY

221 6 2.7% 126 3 1.4% 65 3 1.4% 21 0 0.0%

WORCESTER COUNTY

364 4 1.1% 110 0 0.0% 219 4 1.1% 34 0 0.0%

STATEWIDE JULY 2016

7170 638 8.9% 3476 184 2.6% 2591 380 5.3% 614 74 1.0%

Aug-16 ALLEGANY COUNTY

126 10 7.9% 75 8 6.3% 37 2 1.6% 1 0 0.0%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

661 95 14.4% 254 23 3.5% 326 66 10.0% 43 6 0.9%

BALTIMORE CITY

1517 124 8.2% 757 18 1.2% 513 99 6.5% 70 7 0.5%

BALTIMORE COUNTY

818 90 11.0% 510 40 4.9% 199 42 5.1% 41 8 1.0%

CALVERT COUNTY

102 2 2.0% 44 0 0.0% 18 0 0.0% 37 2 2.0%

CAROLINE COUNTY

56 3 5.4% 27 0 0.0% 10 1 1.8% 12 2 3.6%

58













CARROLL COUNTY

109 5 4.6% 47 1 0.9% 30 1 0.9% 19 3 2.8%


155 1 0.6% 47 0 0.0% 77 1 0.6% 18 0 0.0%

DORCHESTER COUNTY

69 0 0.0% 48 0 0.0% 14 0 0.0% 3 0 0.0%

FREDERICK COUNTY

199 23 11.6% 92 4 2.0% 89 16 8.0% 12 3 1.5%

GARRETT COUNTY

31 7 22.6% 13 2 6.5% 12 4 12.9% 5 1 3.2%

HARFORD COUNTY

171 18 10.5% 80 8 4.7% 72 9 5.3% 4 1 0.6%

HOWARD COUNTY

165 20 12.1% 84 11 6.7% 17 3 1.8% 50 6 3.6%

KENT COUNTY 13 0 0.0% 6 0 0.0% 2 0 0.0% 5 0 0.0% MONTGOMERY COUNTY

603 92 15.3% 329 33 5.5% 119 29 4.8% 123 30 5.0%


927 130 14.0% 506 54 5.8% 343 71 7.7% 30 5 0.5%


55 1 1.8% 35 0 0.0% 11 1 1.8% 7 0 0.0%


106 1 0.9% 27 0 0.0% 52 1 0.9% 22 0 0.0%

SOMERSET COUNTY

38 1 2.6% 20 0 0.0% 4 0 0.0% 12 1 2.6%

TALBOT COUNTY

52 7 13.5% 19 1 1.9% 22 5 9.6% 6 1 1.9%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

173 14 8.1% 79 2 1.2% 67 10 5.8% 13 2 1.2%

WICOMICO COUNTY

203 6 3.0% 115 2 1.0% 63 4 2.0% 13 0 0.0%

59













WORCESTER COUNTY

260 6 2.3% 70 1 0.4% 163 5 1.9% 25 0 0.0%


6753 678 10.0% 3356 213 3.2% 2298 380 5.6% 595 85 1.3%

Sep-16 ALLEGANY COUNTY

140 12 8.6% 80 6 4.3% 47 6 4.3% 4 0 0.0%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

661 90 13.6% 246 23 3.5% 337 56 8.5% 45 11 1.7%

BALTIMORE CITY

1552 124 8.0% 768 28 1.8% 571 92 5.9% 51 4 0.3%

BALTIMORE COUNTY

821 74 9.0% 480 30 3.7% 228 40 4.9% 38 4 0.5%

CALVERT COUNTY

122 0 0.0% 47 0 0.0% 24 0 0.0% 48 0 0.0%

CAROLINE COUNTY

39 4 10.3% 14 0 0.0% 17 3 7.7% 6 1 2.6%

CARROLL COUNTY

92 6 6.5% 44 3 3.3% 25 1 1.1% 19 2 2.2%


176 0 0.0% 58 0 0.0% 95 0 0.0% 13 0 0.0%

DORCHESTER COUNTY

59 5 8.5% 29 3 5.1% 16 1 1.7% 12 1 1.7%

FREDERICK COUNTY

151 23 15.2% 51 3 2.0% 80 18 11.9% 19 2 1.3%

GARRETT COUNTY

23 1 4.3% 14 1 4.3% 4 0 0.0% 4 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY

184 12 6.5% 59 3 1.6% 102 9 4.9% 3 0 0.0%

HOWARD COUNTY

199 17 8.5% 95 8 4.0% 28 3 1.5% 63 6 3.0%

KENT COUNTY 17 0 0.0% 12 0 0.0% 2 0 0.0% 3 0 0.0%

60













MONTGOMERY COUNTY

649 104 16.0% 317 26 4.0% 154 47 7.2% 156 31 4.8%


873 129 14.8% 464 51 5.8% 330 75 8.6% 19 3 0.3%


48 2 4.2% 27 1 2.1% 11 1 2.1% 6 0 0.0%


106 1 0.9% 36 1 0.9% 42 0 0.0% 20 0 0.0%

SOMERSET COUNTY

44 0 0.0% 26 0 0.0% 6 0 0.0% 11 0 0.0%

TALBOT COUNTY

67 3 4.5% 24 1 1.5% 24 1 1.5% 14 1 1.5%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

170 25 14.7% 90 7 4.1% 60 17 10.0% 11 1 0.6%

WICOMICO COUNTY

188 4 2.1% 103 1 0.5% 58 1 0.5% 22 2 1.1%

WORCESTER COUNTY

139 6 4.3% 48 1 0.7% 81 5 3.6% 7 0 0.0%


6696 683 10.2% 3231 217 3.2% 2392 388 5.8% 614 78 1.2%

Oct-16 ALLEGANY COUNTY

112 5 4.5% 52 4 3.6% 47 5 4.5% 8 1 0.9%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

620 84 13.5% 183 17 2.7% 329 49 7.9% 52 18 2.9%

BALTIMORE CITY

1468 123 8.4% 731 28 1.9% 523 90 6.1% 47 5 0.3%

BALTIMORE COUNTY

768 78 10.2% 444 36 4.7% 202 41 5.3% 45 1 0.1%

CALVERT COUNTY

94 0 0.0% 34 0 0.0% 20 0 0.0% 40 0 0.0%

61













CAROLINE COUNTY

45 6 13.3% 15 0 0.0% 16 3 6.7% 10 3 6.7%

CARROLL COUNTY

112 8 7.1% 48 4 3.6% 35 3 2.7% 16 1 0.9%


186 4 2.2% 54 0 0.0% 89 4 2.2% 19 0 0.0%

DORCHESTER COUNTY

62 2 3.2% 30 1 1.6% 17 1 1.6% 12 0 0.0%

FREDERICK COUNTY

150 28 18.7% 51 7 4.7% 76 19 12.7% 15 2 1.3%

GARRETT COUNTY

29 1 3.4% 8 0 0.0% 10 0 0.0% 5 1 3.4%

HARFORD COUNTY

164 16 9.8% 63 8 4.9% 78 7 4.3% 5 1 0.6%

HOWARD COUNTY

198 17 8.6% 96 11 5.6% 33 2 1.0% 57 4 2.0%


668 131 19.6% 316 47 7.0% 137 45 6.7% 159 39 5.8%


978 154 15.7% 482 59 6.0% 380 86 8.8% 36 9 0.9%


43 7 16.3% 14 1 2.3% 19 4 9.3% 7 2 4.7%


102 1 1.0% 28 1 1.0% 46 0 0.0% 21 0 0.0%

SOMERSET COUNTY

45 2 4.4% 24 1 2.2% 7 0 0.0% 10 1 2.2%

TALBOT COUNTY

45 4 8.9% 12 0 0.0% 20 3 6.7% 6 1 2.2%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

154 19 12.3% 55 3 1.9% 66 15 9.7% 13 1 0.6%

62













WICOMICO COUNTY

175 9 5.1% 79 2 1.1% 63 4 2.3% 18 3 1.7%

WORCESTER COUNTY

113 2 1.8% 38 1 0.9% 60 1 0.9% 6 0 0.0%


6496 730 11.2% 2942 237 3.6% 2322 399 6.1% 622 99 1.5%

Nov-16 ALLEGANY COUNTY

96 7 7.3% 33 4 4.2% 45 3 3.1% 4 0 0.0%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

581 91 15.7% 79 16 2.8% 373 68 11.7% 44 7 1.2%

BALTIMORE CITY

1390 113 8.1% 581 26 1.9% 554 82 5.9% 70 5 0.4%

BALTIMORE COUNTY

689 90 13.1% 208 23 3.3% 261 59 8.6% 47 8 1.2%

CALVERT COUNTY

96 1 1.0% 22 1 1.0% 44 0 0.0% 29 0 0.0%

CAROLINE COUNTY

42 9 21.4% 2 2 4.8% 20 4 9.5% 7 3 7.1%

CARROLL COUNTY

86 8 9.3% 15 0 0.0% 51 8 9.3% 11 0 0.0%


159 1 0.6% 46 0 0.0% 83 1 0.6% 14 0 0.0%

DORCHESTER COUNTY

55 4 7.3% 17 2 3.6% 16 2 3.6% 13 0 0.0%

FREDERICK COUNTY

154 36 23.4% 35 5 3.2% 78 27 17.5% 22 4 2.6%

GARRETT COUNTY

27 1 3.7% 12 0 0.0% 11 1 3.7% 2 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY

148 19 12.8% 53 6 4.1% 83 12 8.1% 4 1 0.7%

63













HOWARD COUNTY

190 22 11.6% 69 4 2.1% 45 6 3.2% 56 12 6.3%


572 116 20.3% 195 27 4.7% 138 39 6.8% 154 50 8.7%


854 114 13.3% 381 39 4.6% 364 70 8.2% 33 5 0.6%


64 9 14.1% 20 2 3.1% 20 4 6.3% 11 3 4.7%


96 0 0.0% 19 0 0.0% 50 0 0.0% 20 0 0.0%

SOMERSET COUNTY

33 2 6.1% 14 0 0.0% 7 0 0.0% 11 2 6.1%

TALBOT COUNTY

49 2 4.1% 11 0 0.0% 20 0 0.0% 6 2 4.1%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

131 12 9.2% 25 1 0.8% 71 11 8.4% 7 0 0.0%

WICOMICO COUNTY

187 16 8.6% 76 0 0.0% 74 15 8.0% 19 1 0.5%

WORCESTER COUNTY

74 8 10.8% 29 1 1.4% 33 6 8.1% 5 1 1.4%


5912 703 11.9% 1968 160 2.7% 2501 432 7.3% 609 111 1.9%

Dec-16 ALLEGANY COUNTY

101 6 5.9% 44 2 2.0% 38 3 3.0% 1 1 1.0%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

560 53 9.5% 100 15 2.7% 354 31 5.5% 38 7 1.3%

BALTIMORE CITY

1340 107 8.0% 539 20 1.5% 503 83 6.2% 74 4 0.3%

BALTIMORE COUNTY

757 85 11.2% 247 24 3.2% 279 50 6.6% 45 11 1.5%

64













CALVERT COUNTY

76 1 1.3% 16 0 0.0% 18 0 0.0% 35 1 1.3%

CAROLINE COUNTY

33 2 6.1% 1 0 0.0% 7 1 3.0% 9 1 3.0%

CARROLL COUNTY

88 2 2.3% 15 0 0.0% 46 2 2.3% 14 0 0.0%


164 1 0.6% 45 0 0.0% 77 1 0.6% 21 0 0.0%

DORCHESTER COUNTY

58 2 3.4% 15 0 0.0% 29 0 0.0% 6 2 3.4%

FREDERICK COUNTY

144 25 17.4% 29 4 2.8% 65 14 9.7% 22 7 4.9%

GARRETT COUNTY

26 4 15.4% 9 3 11.5% 8 1 3.8% 3 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY

156 11 7.1% 67 6 3.8% 83 5 3.2% 0 0 0.0%

HOWARD COUNTY

167 15 9.0% 68 5 3.0% 31 4 2.4% 45 6 3.6%


556 86 15.5% 208 26 4.7% 119 34 6.1% 152 26 4.7%


870 135 15.5% 400 51 5.9% 358 80 9.2% 32 4 0.5%


37 0 0.0% 5 0 0.0% 6 0 0.0% 3 0 0.0%


110 0 0.0% 21 0 0.0% 57 0 0.0% 20 0 0.0%

SOMERSET COUNTY

26 1 3.8% 7 0 0.0% 6 1 3.8% 8 0 0.0%

TALBOT COUNTY

50 5 10.0% 2 0 0.0% 23 4 8.0% 13 1 2.0%

65













WASHINGTON COUNTY

118 9 7.6% 20 0 0.0% 52 9 7.6% 10 0 0.0%

WICOMICO COUNTY

183 11 6.0% 65 1 0.5% 66 8 4.4% 28 2 1.1%

WORCESTER COUNTY

80 4 5.0% 27 0 0.0% 40 4 5.0% 9 0 0.0%


5833 581 10.0% 1980 159 2.7% 2319 348 6.0% 610 74 1.3%

Jan-17 ALLEGANY COUNTY

119 9 7.6% 48 2 1.7% 51 6 5.0% 5 1 0.8%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

696 77 11.1% 107 4 0.6% 427 68 9.8% 36 5 0.7%

BALTIMORE CITY

1699 128 7.5% 666 35 2.1% 645 90 5.3% 93 3 0.2%

BALTIMORE COUNTY

815 84 10.3% 231 24 2.9% 276 53 6.5% 54 7 0.9%

CALVERT COUNTY

97 0 0.0% 29 0 0.0% 30 0 0.0% 29 0 0.0%

CAROLINE COUNTY

51 7 13.7% 11 3 5.9% 20 4 7.8% 8 0 0.0%

CARROLL COUNTY

77 4 5.2% 4 0 0.0% 43 2 2.6% 16 2 2.6%


182 1 0.5% 56 1 0.5% 78 0 0.0% 18 0 0.0%

DORCHESTER COUNTY

57 1 1.8% 4 0 0.0% 23 1 1.8% 4 0 0.0%

FREDERICK COUNTY

179 29 16.2% 47 9 5.0% 63 12 6.7% 27 8 4.5%

GARRETT COUNTY

19 2 10.5% 6 0 0.0% 5 0 0.0% 5 2 10.5%

66













HARFORD COUNTY

165 12 7.3% 67 5 3.0% 84 7 4.2% 0 0 0.0%

HOWARD COUNTY

158 11 7.0% 46 2 1.3% 41 2 1.3% 44 7 4.4%


619 88 14.2% 195 25 4.0% 147 32 5.2% 176 31 5.0%


964 146 15.1% 470 54 5.6% 384 89 9.2% 25 3 0.3%


49 5 10.2% 21 3 6.1% 12 2 4.1% 2 0 0.0%


115 1 0.9% 26 0 0.0% 58 1 0.9% 22 0 0.0%

SOMERSET COUNTY

26 1 3.8% 13 0 0.0% 3 1 3.8% 9 0 0.0%

TALBOT COUNTY

64 5 7.8% 12 0 0.0% 25 3 4.7% 10 2 3.1%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

148 9 6.1% 32 1 0.7% 65 8 5.4% 15 0 0.0%

WICOMICO COUNTY

148 12 8.1% 40 2 1.4% 67 8 5.4% 18 2 1.4%

WORCESTER COUNTY

102 13 12.7% 39 2 2.0% 47 11 10.8% 9 0 0.0%


6719 685 10.2% 2222 182 2.7% 2655 417 6.2% 651 86 1.3%

Feb-17 ALLEGANY COUNTY

123 10 8.1% 71 9 7.3% 38 1 0.8% 4 0 0.0%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

658 57 8.7% 115 8 1.2% 374 39 5.9% 58 10 1.5%

BALTIMORE CITY

1639 114 7.0% 632 13 0.8% 633 94 5.7% 94 7 0.4%

67













BALTIMORE COUNTY

794 109 13.7% 223 32 4.0% 281 67 8.4% 57 10 1.3%

CALVERT COUNTY

97 0 0.0% 24 0 0.0% 34 0 0.0% 34 0 0.0%

CAROLINE COUNTY

44 8 18.2% 5 1 2.3% 19 4 9.1% 12 3 6.8%

CARROLL COUNTY

101 9 8.9% 13 0 0.0% 53 7 6.9% 15 2 2.0%


155 1 0.6% 51 0 0.0% 76 1 0.6% 13 0 0.0%

DORCHESTER COUNTY

49 3 6.1% 13 1 2.0% 22 1 2.0% 4 1 2.0%

FREDERICK COUNTY

189 36 19.0% 41 6 3.2% 80 19 10.1% 37 11 5.8%

GARRETT COUNTY

20 0 0.0% 10 0 0.0% 5 0 0.0% 3 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY

138 14 10.1% 54 1 0.7% 67 12 8.7% 2 1 0.7%

HOWARD COUNTY

154 17 11.0% 43 2 1.3% 43 6 3.9% 53 9 5.8%


591 113 19.1% 170 20 3.4% 152 49 8.3% 198 44 7.4%


958 145 15.1% 441 48 5.0% 386 93 9.7% 40 4 0.4%


57 2 3.5% 19 1 1.8% 13 0 0.0% 12 1 1.8%


106 0 0.0% 17 0 0.0% 50 0 0.0% 27 0 0.0%

SOMERSET COUNTY

40 5 12.5% 16 0 0.0% 11 3 7.5% 11 2 5.0%

68













TALBOT COUNTY

42 7 16.7% 7 1 2.4% 15 1 2.4% 12 5 11.9%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

140 11 7.9% 28 2 1.4% 66 9 6.4% 14 0 0.0%

WICOMICO COUNTY

147 16 10.9% 48 2 1.4% 43 6 4.1% 22 8 5.4%

WORCESTER COUNTY

60 9 15.0% 23 1 1.7% 28 7 11.7% 5 1 1.7%


6469 725 11.2% 2110 158 2.4% 2547 436 6.7% 757 131 2.0%

Mar-17 ALLEGANY COUNTY

135 16 11.9% 59 4 3.0% 60 12 8.9% 5 0 0.0%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

660 62 9.4% 104 18 2.7% 393 38 5.8% 36 6 0.9%

BALTIMORE CITY

1643 142 8.6% 584 17 1.0% 604 117 7.1% 105 8 0.5%

BALTIMORE COUNTY

824 101 12.3% 251 28 3.4% 275 65 7.9% 46 8 1.0%

CALVERT COUNTY

117 3 2.6% 20 0 0.0% 43 2 1.7% 42 1 0.9%

CAROLINE COUNTY

64 7 10.9% 11 0 0.0% 23 4 6.3% 11 3 4.7%

CARROLL COUNTY

97 6 6.2% 21 0 0.0% 25 3 3.1% 21 3 3.1%


187 6 3.2% 39 1 0.5% 103 4 2.1% 23 1 0.5%

DORCHESTER COUNTY

42 3 7.1% 10 0 0.0% 15 2 4.8% 4 1 2.4%

FREDERICK COUNTY

200 26 13.0% 40 8 4.0% 104 14 7.0% 27 4 2.0%

69













GARRETT COUNTY

12 1 8.3% 2 0 0.0% 6 1 8.3% 2 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY

183 14 7.7% 58 2 1.1% 97 11 6.0% 7 1 0.5%

HOWARD COUNTY

198 25 12.6% 46 4 2.0% 67 11 5.6% 59 10 5.1%


631 109 17.3% 226 25 4.0% 150 35 5.5% 175 49 7.8%


1024 152 14.8% 423 54 5.3% 445 91 8.9% 37 7 0.7%


47 1 2.1% 15 0 0.0% 17 1 2.1% 2 0 0.0%


115 2 1.7% 12 0 0.0% 60 1 0.9% 22 1 0.9%

SOMERSET COUNTY

25 4 16.0% 9 0 0.0% 6 2 8.0% 8 2 8.0%

TALBOT COUNTY

61 7 11.5% 9 5 8.2% 25 0 0.0% 7 2 3.3%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

153 13 8.5% 30 0 0.0% 80 13 8.5% 10 0 0.0%

WICOMICO COUNTY

181 19 10.5% 69 4 2.2% 58 8 4.4% 27 7 3.9%

WORCESTER COUNTY

103 14 13.6% 36 5 4.9% 59 9 8.7% 4 0 0.0%


6881 765 11.1% 2122 182 2.6% 2786 462 6.7% 709 121 1.8%

Apr-17 ALLEGANY COUNTY

115 10 8.7% 51 4 3.5% 50 6 5.2% 1 0 0.0%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

649 56 8.6% 90 16 2.5% 405 34 5.2% 34 6 0.9%

70













BALTIMORE CITY

1545 137 8.9% 507 23 1.5% 581 106 6.9% 104 8 0.5%

BALTIMORE COUNTY

802 93 11.6% 235 31 3.9% 288 57 7.1% 36 5 0.6%

CALVERT COUNTY

94 2 2.1% 19 0 0.0% 41 1 1.1% 27 1 1.1%

CAROLINE COUNTY

36 1 2.8% 0 0 0.0% 17 1 2.8% 7 0 0.0%

CARROLL COUNTY

82 9 11.0% 20 3 3.7% 35 4 4.9% 13 2 2.4%


167 6 3.6% 53 0 0.0% 85 6 3.6% 9 0 0.0%

DORCHESTER COUNTY

70 3 4.3% 30 0 0.0% 22 2 2.9% 8 1 1.4%

FREDERICK COUNTY

164 26 15.9% 29 2 1.2% 85 21 12.8% 22 3 1.8%

GARRETT COUNTY

18 0 0.0% 4 0 0.0% 9 0 0.0% 2 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY

166 11 6.6% 60 6 3.6% 90 5 3.0% 1 0 0.0%

HOWARD COUNTY

169 20 11.8% 64 4 2.4% 42 11 6.5% 51 5 3.0%


570 101 17.7% 210 31 5.4% 143 29 5.1% 138 41 7.2%


1002 166 16.6% 451 63 6.3% 428 97 9.7% 32 6 0.6%


51 4 7.8% 17 1 2.0% 15 1 2.0% 9 2 3.9%


89 0 0.0% 15 0 0.0% 45 0 0.0% 16 0 0.0%

71













SOMERSET COUNTY

38 0 0.0% 17 0 0.0% 3 0 0.0% 12 0 0.0%

TALBOT COUNTY

44 3 6.8% 2 0 0.0% 18 2 4.5% 8 1 2.3%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

146 12 8.2% 21 0 0.0% 68 12 8.2% 16 0 0.0%

WICOMICO COUNTY

201 24 11.9% 87 2 1.0% 80 19 9.5% 17 3 1.5%

WORCESTER COUNTY

93 7 7.5% 30 0 0.0% 48 7 7.5% 12 0 0.0%


6458 710 11.0% 2062 189 2.9% 2650 431 6.7% 601 90 1.4%

May-17 ALLEGANY COUNTY

117 8 6.8% 55 7 6.0% 50 1 0.9% 1 0 0.0%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

664 58 8.7% 114 23 3.5% 386 27 4.1% 44 8 1.2%

BALTIMORE CITY

1578 133 8.4% 470 16 1.0% 614 114 7.2% 100 3 0.2%

BALTIMORE COUNTY

826 78 9.4% 223 26 3.1% 283 43 5.2% 50 9 1.1%

CALVERT COUNTY

111 6 5.4% 21 0 0.0% 42 5 4.5% 34 1 0.9%

CAROLINE COUNTY

57 4 7.0% 6 1 1.8% 31 2 3.5% 7 1 1.8%

CARROLL COUNTY

98 6 6.1% 10 0 0.0% 48 4 4.1% 15 2 2.0%


214 15 7.0% 55 5 2.3% 106 8 3.7% 23 2 0.9%

DORCHESTER COUNTY

42 4 9.5% 20 2 4.8% 7 2 4.8% 7 0 0.0%

72













FREDERICK COUNTY

186 17 9.1% 30 3 1.6% 90 12 6.5% 24 2 1.1%

GARRETT COUNTY

24 3 12.5% 10 0 0.0% 6 1 4.2% 4 2 8.3%

HARFORD COUNTY

192 14 7.3% 59 5 2.6% 108 9 4.7% 4 0 0.0%

HOWARD COUNTY

179 18 10.1% 41 5 2.8% 57 4 2.2% 64 9 5.0%


638 92 14.4% 234 17 2.7% 161 40 6.3% 170 35 5.5%


1030 145 14.1% 466 47 4.6% 411 88 8.5% 58 10 1.0%


50 4 8.0% 12 1 2.0% 18 2 4.0% 12 1 2.0%


110 2 1.8% 15 0 0.0% 63 2 1.8% 23 0 0.0%

SOMERSET COUNTY

80 0 0.0% 45 0 0.0% 14 0 0.0% 15 0 0.0%

TALBOT COUNTY

62 2 3.2% 8 0 0.0% 28 0 0.0% 9 2 3.2%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

175 19 10.9% 20 1 0.6% 86 16 9.1% 15 2 1.1%

WICOMICO COUNTY

193 22 11.4% 59 5 2.6% 69 14 7.3% 32 3 1.6%

WORCESTER COUNTY

207 15 7.2% 55 2 1.0% 126 10 4.8% 22 3 1.4%

STATEWIDE MAY 2017

7027 686 9.8% 2082 171 2.4% 2876 416 5.9% 756 99 1.4%

Jun-17 ALLEGANY COUNTY

117 5 4.3% 52 1 0.9% 51 4 3.4% 1 0 0.0%

73













ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

682 46 6.7% 78 10 1.5% 433 31 4.5% 59 5 0.7%

BALTIMORE CITY

1743 158 9.1% 559 32 1.8% 596 119 6.8% 107 7 0.4%

BALTIMORE COUNTY

820 81 9.9% 219 16 2.0% 271 52 6.3% 63 13 1.6%

CALVERT COUNTY

108 4 3.7% 17 0 0.0% 41 1 0.9% 41 3 2.8%

CAROLINE COUNTY

36 2 5.6% 3 1 2.8% 13 1 2.8% 7 0 0.0%

CARROLL COUNTY

101 19 18.8% 8 0 0.0% 60 16 15.8% 16 3 3.0%


198 15 7.6% 44 0 0.0% 100 14 7.1% 12 1 0.5%

DORCHESTER COUNTY

73 7 9.6% 19 1 1.4% 20 4 5.5% 22 2 2.7%

FREDERICK COUNTY

165 22 13.3% 20 1 0.6% 82 17 10.3% 28 4 2.4%

GARRETT COUNTY

19 2 10.5% 7 0 0.0% 9 1 5.3% 2 1 5.3%

HARFORD COUNTY

172 12 7.0% 58 2 1.2% 99 10 5.8% 2 0 0.0%

HOWARD COUNTY

225 16 7.1% 68 3 1.3% 59 8 3.6% 77 5 2.2%


663 106 16.0% 214 20 3.0% 164 43 6.5% 173 43 6.5%


1113 131 11.8% 481 29 2.6% 486 93 8.4% 52 9 0.8%


59 2 3.4% 17 0 0.0% 17 1 1.7% 9 1 1.7%

74














91 7 7.7% 8 0 0.0% 59 6 6.6% 16 1 1.1%

SOMERSET COUNTY

32 0 0.0% 10 0 0.0% 4 0 0.0% 8 0 0.0%

TALBOT COUNTY

83 23 27.7% 6 2 2.4% 54 19 22.9% 7 2 2.4%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

152 16 10.5% 15 0 0.0% 73 15 9.9% 10 1 0.7%

WICOMICO COUNTY

194 17 8.8% 48 3 1.5% 87 11 5.7% 29 3 1.5%

WORCESTER COUNTY

441 12 2.7% 70 1 0.2% 298 8 1.8% 45 3 0.7%

STATEWIDE JUNE 2017

7455 715 9.6% 2059 125 1.7% 3140 481 6.5% 814 109 1.5%

Jul-17 ALLEGANY COUNTY

125 5 4.0% 43 3 2.4% 53 2 1.6% 1 0 0.0%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

692 34 4.9% 76 15 2.2% 425 17 2.5% 41 2 0.3%

BALTIMORE CITY

1649 133 8.1% 367 19 1.2% 629 112 6.8% 85 2 0.1%

BALTIMORE COUNTY

855 81 9.5% 208 23 2.7% 295 48 5.6% 65 10 1.2%

CALVERT COUNTY

135 12 8.9% 16 0 0.0% 62 7 5.2% 43 5 3.7%

CAROLINE COUNTY

43 6 14.0% 4 1 2.3% 18 4 9.3% 7 1 2.3%

CARROLL COUNTY

113 9 8.0% 22 1 0.9% 46 6 5.3% 19 2 1.8%


204 11 5.4% 31 1 0.5% 108 8 3.9% 19 2 1.0%

75













DORCHESTER COUNTY

59 3 5.1% 16 0 0.0% 13 2 3.4% 20 1 1.7%

FREDERICK COUNTY

163 24 14.7% 13 1 0.6% 102 18 11.0% 24 5 3.1%

GARRETT COUNTY

29 2 6.9% 5 0 0.0% 11 1 3.4% 7 1 3.4%

HARFORD COUNTY

167 5 3.0% 52 2 1.2% 95 3 1.8% 0 0 0.0%

HOWARD COUNTY

207 23 11.1% 54 3 1.4% 65 10 4.8% 62 10 4.8%


661 113 17.1% 158 17 2.6% 218 49 7.4% 171 47 7.1%


1220 117 9.6% 423 26 2.1% 579 86 7.0% 68 5 0.4%


59 3 5.1% 14 0 0.0% 17 1 1.7% 13 2 3.4%


111 9 8.1% 7 1 0.9% 68 6 5.4% 14 2 1.8%

SOMERSET COUNTY

24 1 4.2% 7 0 0.0% 8 1 4.2% 6 0 0.0%

TALBOT COUNTY

53 3 5.7% 6 1 1.9% 28 2 3.8% 10 0 0.0%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

164 7 4.3% 12 0 0.0% 92 7 4.3% 8 0 0.0%

WICOMICO COUNTY

218 10 4.6% 52 3 1.4% 103 4 1.8% 30 3 1.4%

WORCESTER COUNTY

394 15 3.8% 62 5 1.3% 285 6 1.5% 25 4 1.0%

STATEWIDE JULY 2017

7493 636 8.5% 1677 123 1.6% 3367 405 5.4% 762 108 1.4%

Aug-17

76













ALLEGANY COUNTY

130 1 0.8% 54 1 0.8% 46 0 0.0% 3 0 0.0%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

650 17 2.6% 80 11 1.7% 376 6 0.9% 44 0 0.0%

BALTIMORE CITY

1713 119 6.9% 287 14 0.8% 664 103 6.0% 90 2 0.1%

BALTIMORE COUNTY

890 41 4.6% 240 11 1.2% 279 23 2.6% 62 7 0.8%

CALVERT COUNTY

105 4 3.8% 13 0 0.0% 46 4 3.8% 41 0 0.0%

CAROLINE COUNTY

42 0 0.0% 4 0 0.0% 17 0 0.0% 6 0 0.0%

CARROLL COUNTY

101 2 2.0% 9 0 0.0% 58 2 2.0% 14 0 0.0%


155 8 5.2% 36 1 0.6% 62 4 2.6% 19 3 1.9%

DORCHESTER COUNTY

61 2 3.3% 10 0 0.0% 18 2 3.3% 17 0 0.0%

FREDERICK COUNTY

157 7 4.5% 14 0 0.0% 80 7 4.5% 32 0 0.0%

GARRETT COUNTY

45 0 0.0% 17 0 0.0% 14 0 0.0% 8 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY

171 13 7.6% 62 7 4.1% 82 5 2.9% 3 1 0.6%

HOWARD COUNTY

179 10 5.6% 44 0 0.0% 61 6 3.4% 41 4 2.2%


724 111 15.3% 136 12 1.7% 231 44 6.1% 226 55 7.6%


1041 85 8.2% 382 25 2.4% 497 53 5.1% 42 7 0.7%

77














51 5 9.8% 10 0 0.0% 17 2 3.9% 10 3 5.9%


105 4 3.8% 9 0 0.0% 50 4 3.8% 21 0 0.0%

SOMERSET COUNTY

38 0 0.0% 9 0 0.0% 11 0 0.0% 10 0 0.0%

TALBOT COUNTY

57 2 3.5% 6 0 0.0% 21 1 1.8% 11 1 1.8%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

183 13 7.1% 14 0 0.0% 94 13 7.1% 17 0 0.0%

WICOMICO COUNTY

208 12 5.8% 51 4 1.9% 66 4 1.9% 37 4 1.9%

WORCESTER COUNTY

273 6 2.2% 76 1 0.4% 155 4 1.5% 28 1 0.4%


7292 486 6.7% 1612 89 1.2% 3035 304 4.2% 808 93 1.3%

Sep-17 ALLEGANY COUNTY

105 0 0.0% 30 0 0.0% 44 0 0.0% 5 0 0.0%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

658 3 0.5% 84 3 0.5% 413 0 0.0% 38 0 0.0%

BALTIMORE CITY

1548 65 4.2% 239 1 0.1% 624 61 3.9% 100 3 0.2%

BALTIMORE COUNTY

866 0 0.0% 197 0 0.0% 274 0 0.0% 72 0 0.0%

CALVERT COUNTY

109 1 0.9% 15 1 0.9% 43 0 0.0% 37 0 0.0%

CAROLINE COUNTY

49 0 0.0% 6 0 0.0% 14 0 0.0% 12 0 0.0%

CARROLL COUNTY

73 0 0.0% 7 0 0.0% 34 0 0.0% 15 0 0.0%

CECIL COUNTY 165 6 3.6% 26 4 2.4% 70 2 1.2% 19 0 0.0%

78













CHARLES COUNTY

192 2 1.0% 35 1 0.5% 85 1 0.5% 19 0 0.0%

DORCHESTER COUNTY

67 0 0.0% 11 0 0.0% 17 0 0.0% 11 0 0.0%

FREDERICK COUNTY

184 0 0.0% 8 0 0.0% 117 0 0.0% 19 0 0.0%

GARRETT COUNTY

41 0 0.0% 16 0 0.0% 15 0 0.0% 6 0 0.0%

HARFORD COUNTY

173 3 1.7% 62 0 0.0% 89 2 1.2% 2 1 0.6%

HOWARD COUNTY

167 1 0.6% 45 1 0.6% 48 0 0.0% 54 0 0.0%


646 12 1.9% 169 7 1.1% 178 3 0.5% 174 2 0.3%


1070 51 4.8% 374 12 1.1% 535 37 3.5% 43 2 0.2%


52 2 3.8% 8 0 0.0% 18 2 3.8% 9 0 0.0%


115 4 3.5% 13 1 0.9% 64 3 2.6% 20 0 0.0%

SOMERSET COUNTY

31 0 0.0% 8 0 0.0% 7 0 0.0% 3 0 0.0%

TALBOT COUNTY

48 0 0.0% 6 0 0.0% 18 0 0.0% 4 0 0.0%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

154 1 0.6% 11 0 0.0% 97 1 0.6% 9 0 0.0%

WICOMICO COUNTY

219 2 0.9% 40 2 0.9% 76 0 0.0% 31 0 0.0%

WORCESTER COUNTY

248 11 4.4% 48 4 1.6% 158 3 1.2% 27 4 1.6%

79














7001 166 2.4% 1461 38 0.5% 3048 116 1.7% 731 12 0.2%


101,655 9,587 9.4% 34,360 2,427 2.4% 40,527 5,795 5.7% 10,253 1,370 1.3%

80

Table 6: Failure to Appear Rates, Criminal Cases: July 2016-September 2017 by Jurisdiction. Number and Percentage of Defendants that Fail to Appear (as a percentage of Initial Appearances):

County Total Initial Appear












July 2016 to September 2017

ALLEGANY COUNTY

1779 115 6.5% 821 63 3.5% 694 54 2.8% 48 3 0.2%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

9780 912 9.3% 1972 223 2.3% 5698 593 6.1% 660 96 1.0%

BALTIMORE CITY

23646 1840 7.8% 8498 311 1.3% 8814 1454 6.1% 1252 75 0.3%

BALTIMORE COUNTY

12177 1167 9.6% 4436 393 3.2% 3887 667 5.5% 764 107 0.9%

CALVERT COUNTY

1587 36 2.3% 382 2 0.1% 550 20 1.3% 549 14 0.9%

CAROLINE COUNTY

681 60 8.8% 133 9 1.3% 249 32 4.7% 127 19 2.8%

CARROLL COUNTY

1453 100 6.9% 323 14 1.0% 642 61 4.2% 247 25 1.7%


2645 72 2.7% 696 10 0.4% 1303 53 2.0% 256 9 0.3%

DORCHESTER COUNTY

913 39 4.3% 334 10 1.1% 260 20 2.2% 157 9 1.0%

FREDERICK COUNTY

2548 350 13.7% 558 61 2.4% 1279 232 9.1% 341 57 2.2%

GARRETT COUNTY

391 25 6.4% 146 6 1.5% 137 11 2.8% 59 8 2.0%

81

County Total Initial Appear












HARFORD COUNTY

2493 186 7.5% 915 63 2.5% 1297 115 4.6% 40 8 0.3%

HOWARD COUNTY

2719 247 9.1% 942 67 2.5% 666 80 2.9% 826 100 3.7%


9425 1453 15.4% 3423 354 3.8% 2341 547 5.8% 2468 552 5.9%


14974 1941 13.0% 6685 650 4.3% 6351 1207 8.1% 567 84 0.6%


763 48 6.3% 250 10 1.3% 227 23 3.0% 120 15 2.0%


1594 32 2.0% 294 4 0.3% 811 24 1.5% 303 4 0.3%

SOMERSET COUNTY

558 17 3.0% 244 1 0.2% 102 8 1.4% 146 8 1.4%

TALBOT COUNTY

843 76 9.0% 150 11 1.3% 369 43 5.1% 139 22 2.6%

WASHINGTON COUNTY

2322 197 8.5% 532 19 0.8% 1097 170 7.3% 181 8 0.3%

WICOMICO COUNTY

2866 186 6.5% 1058 36 1.3% 1038 109 3.8% 364 41 1.4%

WORCESTER COUNTY

2951 132 4.5% 761 25 0.8% 1800 90 3.0% 263 17 0.6%

STATEWIDE TOTALS

101,655 9,587 9.4% 34,360 2,427 2.4% 40,527 5,795 5.7% 10,253 1,370 1.3%


10.1% 3.1% 5.7% 1.2%


9.2% 2.1% 5.7% 1.4%

82

Table 7: Defendants Held in Custody for More than Five Days after Bail is Set, Criminal Cases: July 2016-September 2017 by month and Jurisdiction. Number and Percentage of Defendants Held in Custody for More than Five Days After Bail is Set (as a percentage of Initial Appearances)

Month/Year/County Number: Total Initial Appearances

Number: Total Released on Own Recognizance or Unsecured Personal Bond

Percent: Released on Own Recognizance or Unsecured Personal Bond

Number: Total Posted Bail 0-5 Days

Percent of Initial Appearances: Posted Bail 0-5 Days

Number: Total Held without Bail at 6 Days

Percent: of Initial Appearances Held Without Bail at 6 Days

Number: Total Held on Default of Bond: 6+ Days

Percent of Initial Appearances: Held on Default of Bond 6+ Days

Jul-16

ALLEGANY COUNTY 118 41 34.7% 50 42.4% 3 2.5% 24 20.3%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

688 397 57.7% 211 30.7% 11 1.6% 69 10.0%

BALTIMORE CITY 1622 622 38.3% 460 28.4% 190 11.7% 350 21.6% BALTIMORE COUNTY 832 239 28.7% 338 40.6% 73 8.8% 182 21.9% CALVERT COUNTY 124 76 61.3% 38 30.6% 1 0.8% 9 7.3% CAROLINE COUNTY 44 17 38.6% 23 52.3% 1 2.3% 3 6.8% CARROLL COUNTY 123 77 62.6% 21 17.1% 7 5.7% 18 14.6% CECIL COUNTY 169 89 52.7% 62 36.7% 0 0.0% 18 10.7% CHARLES COUNTY 151 96 63.6% 44 29.1% 1 0.7% 8 5.3% DORCHESTER COUNTY 90 25 27.8% 45 50.0% 1 1.1% 19 21.1% FREDERICK COUNTY 163 99 60.7% 31 19.0% 7 4.3% 26 16.0% GARRETT COUNTY 57 31 54.4% 15 26.3% 8 14.0% 3 10.6% HARFORD COUNTY 143 71 49.7% 32 22.4% 11 7.7% 29 20.3% HOWARD COUNTY 164 79 48.2% 54 32.9% 6 3.7% 25 15.2% KENT COUNTY 19 12 63.2% 7 36.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% MONTGOMERY COUNTY 634 253 39.9% 224 35.3% 35 5.5% 122 19.2% PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY

1050 445 42.4% 338 32.2% 67 6.4% 200 19.0%

QUEEN ANNES COUNTY 41 27 65.9% 12 29.3% 0 0.0% 2 4.9% SAINT MARYS COUNTY 117 67 57.3% 36 30.8% 1 0.9% 13 11.1% SOMERSET COUNTY 38 17 44.7% 15 39.5% 0 0.0% 6 15.8% TALBOT COUNTY 66 44 66.7% 19 28.8% 0 0.0% 3 4.5% WASHINGTON COUNTY 161 73 45.3% 44 27.3% 8 5.0% 36 22.4% WICOMICO COUNTY 221 87 39.4% 107 48.4% 2 0.9% 25 11.3% WORCESTER COUNTY 364 254 69.8% 78 21.4% 0 0.0% 32 8.8%

83










STATEWIDE JULY 2016 7199 3238 45.0% 2304 32.0% 433 6.0% 1222 17.0% Aug-16 ALLEGANY COUNTY 126 38 30.2% 47 37.3% 13 10.3% 28 22.2% ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

661 371 56.1% 205 31.0% 6 0.9% 79 12.0%


927 373 40.2% 310 33.4% 49 5.3% 195 21.0%

QUEEN ANNES COUNTY 55 25 45.5% 22 40.0% 1 1.8% 7 12.7% SAINT MARYS COUNTY 106 75 70.8% 22 20.8% 1 0.9% 8 7.5% SOMERSET COUNTY 38 16 42.1% 18 47.4% 0 0.0% 4 10.5% TALBOT COUNTY 52 30 57.7% 19 36.5% 1 1.9% 2 3.8% WASHINGTON COUNTY 173 80 46.2% 39 22.5% 14 8.1% 40 23.1% WICOMICO COUNTY 203 76 37.4% 98 48.3% 3 1.5% 26 12.8% WORCESTER COUNTY 260 188 72.3% 62 23.8% 0 0.0% 10 3.8% STATEWIDE AUGUST 2016

6753 2909 43.1% 2186 32.4% 426 6.3% 1232 18.2%

Sep-16 ALLEGANY COUNTY 140 51 36.4% 44 31.4% 9 6.4% 36 25.7%

84










ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

661 385 58.2% 192 29.0% 11 1.7% 72 10.9%


873 349 40.0% 290 33.2% 62 7.1% 172 19.7%

QUEEN ANNES COUNTY 48 20 41.7% 25 52.1% 1 2.1% 2 4.2% SAINT MARYS COUNTY 106 64 60.4% 35 33.0% 1 0.9% 6 5.7% SOMERSET COUNTY 44 17 38.6% 20 45.5% 0 0.0% 7 15.9% TALBOT COUNTY 67 41 61.2% 22 32.8% 0 0.0% 4 6.0% WASHINGTON COUNTY 170 71 41.8% 41 24.1% 10 5.9% 48 28.2% WICOMICO COUNTY 188 80 42.6% 84 44.7% 1 0.5% 23 12.2% WORCESTER COUNTY 139 89 64.0% 40 28.8% 1 0.7% 9 6.5% STATEWIDE SEPTEMBER 2016

6696 3019 45.1% 2090 31.2% 404 6.0% 1182 17.7%

Oct-16 ALLEGANY COUNTY 112 55 49.1% 22 19.6% 5 4.5% 30 26.8% ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

620 382 61.6% 171 27.6% 15 2.4% 51 8.2%

BALTIMORE CITY 1468 570 38.8% 450 30.7% 167 11.4% 281 19.1% BALTIMORE COUNTY 768 247 32.2% 301 39.2% 77 10.0% 143 18.6%

85










CALVERT COUNTY 94 60 63.8% 29 30.9% 0 0.0% 5 5.3% CAROLINE COUNTY 45 26 57.8% 17 37.8% 0 0.0% 2 4.4% CARROLL COUNTY 112 51 45.5% 31 27.7% 13 11.6% 17 15.2% CECIL COUNTY 144 62 43.1% 67 46.5% 2 1.4% 13 9.0% CHARLES COUNTY 186 110 59.1% 59 31.7% 7 3.8% 10 5.4% DORCHESTER COUNTY 62 29 46.8% 23 37.1% 2 3.2% 8 12.9% FREDERICK COUNTY 150 91 60.7% 34 22.7% 8 5.3% 17 11.3% GARRETT COUNTY 29 15 51.7% 3 10.3% 6 20.7% 5 17.2% HARFORD COUNTY 164 83 50.6% 37 22.6% 18 11.0% 26 15.9% HOWARD COUNTY 198 90 45.5% 70 35.4% 12 6.1% 26 13.1% KENT COUNTY 21 3 14.3% 16 76.2% 0 0.0% 2 9.5% MONTGOMERY COUNTY 668 296 44.3% 182 27.2% 57 8.5% 133 19.9% PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY

978 416 42.5% 338 34.6% 84 8.6% 140 14.3%

QUEEN ANNES COUNTY 43 26 60.5% 17 39.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% SAINT MARYS COUNTY 102 67 65.7% 28 27.5% 1 1.0% 6 5.9% SOMERSET COUNTY 45 17 37.8% 20 44.4% 1 2.2% 6 13.3% TALBOT COUNTY 45 26 57.8% 15 33.3% 1 2.2% 3 6.7% WASHINGTON COUNTY 154 79 51.3% 21 13.6% 20 13.0% 34 22.1% WICOMICO COUNTY 175 81 46.3% 75 42.9% 3 1.7% 16 9.1% WORCESTER COUNTY 113 66 58.4% 40 35.4% 2 1.8% 5 4.4% STATEWIDE OCTOBER 2016

6496 2948 45.4% 2066 31.8% 501 7.7% 979 15.1%

Nov-16 ALLEGANY COUNTY 96 49 51.0% 21 21.9% 14 14.6% 12 12.5% ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

581 419 72.1% 114 19.6% 26 4.5% 20 3.4%

BALTIMORE CITY 1390 624 44.9% 380 27.3% 185 13.3% 201 14.5% BALTIMORE COUNTY 689 308 44.7% 148 21.5% 173 25.1% 60 8.7% CALVERT COUNTY 96 73 76.0% 18 18.8% 0 0.0% 5 5.2% CAROLINE COUNTY 42 27 64.3% 15 35.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% CARROLL COUNTY 86 62 72.1% 11 12.8% 9 10.5% 4 4.7% CECIL COUNTY 123 73 59.3% 36 29.3% 8 6.5% 6 4.9%

86










CHARLES COUNTY 159 98 61.6% 44 27.7% 5 3.1% 12 7.5% DORCHESTER COUNTY 55 29 52.7% 21 38.2% 3 5.5% 2 3.6% FREDERICK COUNTY 154 100 64.9% 31 20.1% 19 12.3% 4 2.6% GARRETT COUNTY 27 13 48.1% 9 33.3% 2 7.4% 3 11.1% HARFORD COUNTY 148 87 58.8% 40 27.0% 8 5.4% 13 8.8% HOWARD COUNTY 190 101 53.2% 43 22.6% 20 10.5% 26 13.7% KENT COUNTY 16 7 43.8% 7 43.8% 2 12.5% 0 0.0% MONTGOMERY COUNTY 572 292 51.0% 139 24.3% 85 14.9% 56 9.8% PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY

854 397 46.5% 266 31.1% 78 9.1% 113 13.2%

QUEEN ANNES COUNTY 64 32 50.0% 27 42.2% 1 1.6% 4 6.3% SAINT MARYS COUNTY 96 70 72.9% 15 15.6% 2 2.1% 9 9.4% SOMERSET COUNTY 33 18 54.5% 15 45.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% TALBOT COUNTY 49 29 59.2% 17 34.7% 1 2.0% 2 4.1% WASHINGTON COUNTY 131 78 59.5% 20 15.3% 28 21.4% 5 3.8% WICOMICO COUNTY 187 93 49.7% 72 38.5% 4 2.1% 18 9.6% WORCESTER COUNTY 74 38 51.4% 28 37.8% 1 1.4% 7 9.5% STATEWIDE NOVEMBER 2016

5912 3117 52.7% 1537 26.0% 674 11.4% 582 9.8%

Dec-16 ALLEGANY COUNTY 101 39 38.6% 30 29.7% 18 17.8% 14 13.9% ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

560 394 70.4% 110 19.6% 21 3.8% 35 6.3%

BALTIMORE CITY 1340 577 43.1% 365 27.2% 224 16.7% 174 13.0% BALTIMORE COUNTY 757 324 42.8% 173 22.9% 186 24.6% 74 9.8% CALVERT COUNTY 76 54 71.1% 16 21.1% 1 1.3% 5 6.6% CAROLINE COUNTY 33 16 48.5% 15 45.5% 2 6.1% 0 0.0% CARROLL COUNTY 88 60 68.2% 9 10.2% 13 14.8% 6 6.8% CECIL COUNTY 107 66 61.7% 37 34.6% 0 0.0% 4 3.7% CHARLES COUNTY 164 99 60.4% 55 33.5% 2 1.2% 8 4.9% DORCHESTER COUNTY 58 36 62.1% 17 29.3% 2 3.4% 2 3.4% FREDERICK COUNTY 144 87 60.4% 22 15.3% 28 19.4% 7 4.9% GARRETT COUNTY 26 11 42.3% 4 15.4% 6 23.1% 5 19.2%

87










HARFORD COUNTY 156 83 53.2% 41 26.3% 6 3.8% 26 16.7% HOWARD COUNTY 167 76 45.5% 51 30.5% 23 13.8% 17 10.2% KENT COUNTY 26 11 42.3% 14 53.8% 1 3.8% 0 0.0% MONTGOMERY COUNTY 556 271 48.7% 136 24.5% 80 14.4% 69 12.4% PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY

870 390 44.8% 300 34.5% 82 9.4% 98 11.3%

QUEEN ANNES COUNTY 37 10 27.0% 19 51.4% 7 18.9% 1 2.7% SAINT MARYS COUNTY 110 77 70.0% 20 18.2% 2 1.8% 9 8.2% SOMERSET COUNTY 26 14 53.8% 6 23.1% 4 15.4% 2 7.7% TALBOT COUNTY 50 36 72.0% 12 24.0% 2 4.0% 0 0.0% WASHINGTON COUNTY 118 62 52.5% 14 11.9% 36 30.5% 6 5.1% WICOMICO COUNTY 183 98 53.6% 69 37.7% 2 1.1% 14 7.7% WORCESTER COUNTY 80 54 67.5% 16 20.0% 2 2.5% 8 10.0% STATEWIDE DECEMBER 2016

5833 2945 50.5% 1551 26.6% 750 12.9% 584 10.0%

Jan-17 ALLEGANY COUNTY 119 56 47.1% 24 20.2% 15 12.6% 24 20.2% ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

696 468 67.2% 162 23.3% 33 4.7% 31 4.5%

BALTIMORE CITY 1699 738 43.4% 483 28.4% 296 17.4% 182 10.7% BALTIMORE COUNTY 815 330 40.5% 172 21.1% 254 31.2% 59 7.2% CALVERT COUNTY 97 59 60.8% 35 36.1% 0 0.0% 3 3.1% CAROLINE COUNTY 51 32 62.7% 18 35.3% 1 2.0% 0 0.0% CARROLL COUNTY 77 59 76.6% 3 3.9% 14 18.2% 1 1.3% CECIL COUNTY 156 83 53.2% 57 36.5% 5 3.2% 11 7.1% CHARLES COUNTY 182 96 52.7% 70 38.5% 9 4.9% 7 3.8% DORCHESTER COUNTY 57 28 49.1% 17 29.8% 11 19.3% 1 1.8% FREDERICK COUNTY 179 90 50.3% 41 22.9% 42 23.5% 6 3.4% GARRETT COUNTY 19 10 52.6% 3 15.8% 3 15.8% 3 15.8% HARFORD COUNTY 165 84 50.9% 41 24.8% 14 8.5% 26 15.8% HOWARD COUNTY 158 85 53.8% 39 24.7% 27 17.1% 7 4.4% KENT COUNTY 14 6 42.9% 6 42.9% 0 0.0% 2 14.3% MONTGOMERY COUNTY 619 323 52.2% 123 19.9% 103 16.6% 70 11.3%

88











964 409 42.4% 351 36.4% 85 8.8% 119 12.3%

QUEEN ANNES COUNTY 49 18 36.7% 26 53.1% 3 6.1% 2 4.1% SAINT MARYS COUNTY 115 81 70.4% 24 20.9% 3 2.6% 7 6.1% SOMERSET COUNTY 26 12 46.2% 11 42.3% 1 3.8% 2 7.7% TALBOT COUNTY 64 35 54.7% 24 37.5% 5 7.8% 1 1.6% WASHINGTON COUNTY 148 80 54.1% 20 13.5% 36 24.3% 12 8.1% WICOMICO COUNTY 148 86 58.1% 43 29.1% 7 4.7% 12 8.1% WORCESTER COUNTY 102 57 55.9% 38 37.3% 1 1.0% 6 5.9% STATEWIDE JANUARY 2017

6719 3325 49.5% 1831 27.3% 968 14.4% 594 8.8%

Feb-17 ALLEGANY COUNTY 123 42 34.1% 48 39.0% 10 8.1% 23 18.7% ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

658 438 66.6% 163 24.8% 24 3.6% 33 5.0%


958 426 44.5% 332 34.7% 91 9.5% 109 11.4%

QUEEN ANNES COUNTY 57 27 47.4% 30 52.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% SAINT MARYS COUNTY 106 78 73.6% 22 20.8% 1 0.9% 3 2.8%

89










SOMERSET COUNTY 40 23 57.5% 11 27.5% 1 2.5% 5 12.5% TALBOT COUNTY 42 27 64.3% 14 33.3% 0 0.0% 1 2.4% WASHINGTON COUNTY 140 80 57.1% 21 15.0% 32 22.9% 7 5.0% WICOMICO COUNTY 147 65 44.2% 66 44.9% 7 4.8% 9 6.1% WORCESTER COUNTY 60 33 55.0% 23 38.3% 0 0.0% 4 6.7% STATEWIDE FEBRAURY 2017

6469 3316 51.3% 1708 26.4% 847 13.1% 596 9.2%

Mar-17 ALLEGANY COUNTY 135 65 48.1% 50 37.0% 11 8.1% 9 6.7% ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

660 441 66.8% 166 25.2% 29 4.4% 24 3.6%


1024 482 47.1% 313 30.6% 122 11.9% 107 10.4%

QUEEN ANNES COUNTY 47 24 51.1% 20 42.6% 2 4.3% 1 2.1% SAINT MARYS COUNTY 115 83 72.2% 18 15.7% 8 7.0% 6 5.2% SOMERSET COUNTY 25 14 56.0% 10 40.0% 1 4.0% 0 0.0% TALBOT COUNTY 61 33 54.1% 21 34.4% 5 8.2% 2 3.3% WASHINGTON COUNTY 153 90 58.8% 20 13.1% 34 22.2% 9 5.9% WICOMICO COUNTY 181 86 47.5% 71 39.2% 8 4.4% 15 8.3%

90










WORCESTER COUNTY 103 63 61.2% 32 31.1% 1 1.0% 7 6.8% STATEWIDE MARCH 2017

6881 3515 51.1% 1745 25.4% 1026 14.9% 594 8.6%

Apr-17 ALLEGANY COUNTY 115 51 44.3% 35 30.4% 14 12.2% 15 13.0% ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

649 443 68.3% 155 23.9% 31 4.8% 20 3.1%


1002 460 45.9% 325 32.4% 92 9.2% 125 12.5%

QUEEN ANNES COUNTY 51 27 52.9% 20 39.2% 3 5.9% 1 2.0% SAINT MARYS COUNTY 89 62 69.7% 18 20.2% 2 2.2% 7 7.9% SOMERSET COUNTY 38 16 42.1% 14 36.8% 1 2.6% 7 18.4% TALBOT COUNTY 44 26 59.1% 17 38.6% 1 2.3% 0 0.0% WASHINGTON COUNTY 146 84 57.5% 15 10.3% 41 28.1% 6 4.1% WICOMICO COUNTY 201 97 48.3% 81 40.3% 6 3.0% 17 8.5% WORCESTER COUNTY 93 60 64.5% 26 28.0% 0 0.0% 7 7.5% STATEWIDE APRIL 2017 6458 3261 50.5% 1669 25.8% 958 14.8% 570 8.8% May-17 ALLEGANY COUNTY 117 51 43.6% 38 32.5% 11 9.4% 17 14.5%

91










ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

664 435 65.5% 170 25.6% 28 4.2% 30 4.5%


1030 469 45.5% 330 32.0% 95 9.2% 136 13.2%

QUEEN ANNES COUNTY 50 32 64.0% 16 32.0% 1 2.0% 1 2.0% SAINT MARYS COUNTY 110 86 78.2% 15 13.6% 5 4.5% 4 3.6% SOMERSET COUNTY 80 30 37.5% 38 47.5% 2 2.5% 10 12.5% TALBOT COUNTY 62 37 59.7% 21 33.9% 2 3.2% 2 3.2% WASHINGTON COUNTY 175 101 57.7% 6 3.4% 54 30.9% 14 8.0% WICOMICO COUNTY 193 104 53.9% 67 34.7% 6 3.1% 16 8.3% WORCESTER COUNTY 207 149 72.0% 49 23.7% 1 0.5% 8 3.9% STATEWIDE MAY 2017 7027 3646 51.9% 1713 24.4% 1079 15.4% 588 8.4% Jun-17 ALLEGANY COUNTY 117 52 44.4% 41 35.0% 13 11.1% 11 9.4% ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

682 494 72.4% 140 20.5% 24 3.5% 23 3.4%

BALTIMORE CITY 1743 703 40.3% 392 22.5% 482 27.7% 166 9.5% BALTIMORE COUNTY 820 334 40.7% 148 18.0% 270 32.9% 68 8.3% CALVERT COUNTY 108 83 76.9% 20 18.5% 2 1.9% 3 2.8%

92










CAROLINE COUNTY 36 20 55.6% 13 36.1% 3 8.3% 0 0.0% CARROLL COUNTY 101 76 75.2% 4 4.0% 17 16.8% 4 4.0% CECIL COUNTY 148 86 58.1% 50 33.8% 5 3.4% 7 4.7% CHARLES COUNTY 198 127 64.1% 59 29.8% 6 3.0% 6 3.0% DORCHESTER COUNTY 73 42 57.5% 19 26.0% 4 5.5% 7 9.6% FREDERICK COUNTY 165 110 66.7% 11 6.7% 35 21.2% 9 5.5% GARRETT COUNTY 19 11 57.9% 5 26.3% 1 5.3% 2 10.5% HARFORD COUNTY 172 101 58.7% 41 23.8% 13 7.6% 17 9.9% HOWARD COUNTY 225 136 60.4% 44 19.6% 21 9.3% 24 10.7% KENT COUNTY 20 6 30.0% 14 70.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% MONTGOMERY COUNTY 663 337 50.8% 123 18.6% 114 17.2% 89 13.4% PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY

1113 538 48.3% 364 32.7% 94 8.4% 117 10.5%

QUEEN ANNES COUNTY 59 31 52.5% 24 40.7% 3 5.1% 1 1.7% SAINT MARYS COUNTY 91 79 86.8% 8 8.8% 2 2.2% 2 2.2% SOMERSET COUNTY 32 12 37.5% 11 34.4% 5 15.6% 1 3.1% TALBOT COUNTY 83 62 74.7% 20 24.1% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% WASHINGTON COUNTY 152 83 54.6% 9 5.9% 54 35.5% 6 3.9% WICOMICO COUNTY 194 117 60.3% 57 29.4% 12 6.2% 8 4.1% WORCESTER COUNTY 441 345 78.2% 76 17.2% 5 1.1% 15 3.4% STATEWIDE JUNE 2017 7455 3985 53.5% 1693 22.7% 1185 15.9% 587 7.9% Jul-17 ALLEGANY COUNTY 125 54 43.2% 27 21.6% 28 22.4% 16 12.8% ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

692 470 67.9% 170 24.6% 35 5.1% 15 2.2%

BALTIMORE CITY 1649 714 43.3% 257 15.6% 574 34.8% 104 6.3% BALTIMORE COUNTY 855 360 42.1% 130 15.2% 289 33.8% 76 8.9% CALVERT COUNTY 135 106 78.5% 18 13.3% 7 5.2% 4 3.0% CAROLINE COUNTY 43 26 60.5% 16 37.2% 0 0.0% 1 2.3% CARROLL COUNTY 113 65 57.5% 11 9.7% 26 23.0% 11 9.7% CECIL COUNTY 127 62 48.8% 56 44.1% 4 3.1% 5 3.9% CHARLES COUNTY 204 160 78.4% 37 18.1% 2 1.0% 5 2.5%

93










DORCHESTER COUNTY 59 33 55.9% 18 30.5% 7 11.9% 1 1.7% FREDERICK COUNTY 163 126 77.3% 10 6.1% 24 14.7% 3 1.8% HARFORD COUNTY 167 95 56.9% 37 22.2% 20 12.0% 15 9.0% HOWARD COUNTY 207 127 61.4% 40 19.3% 26 12.6% 14 6.8% KENT COUNTY 21 9 42.9% 9 42.9% 2 9.5% 1 4.8% MONTGOMERY COUNTY 661 389 58.9% 98 14.8% 119 18.0% 55 8.3% PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY

1220 647 53.0% 303 24.8% 154 12.6% 116 9.5%

QUEEN ANNES COUNTY 59 30 50.8% 26 44.1% 1 1.7% 2 3.4% SAINT MARYS COUNTY 111 87 78.4% 15 13.5% 6 5.4% 2 1.8% SOMERSET COUNTY 24 14 58.3% 8 33.3% 2 8.3% 0 0.0% TALBOT COUNTY 53 39 73.6% 13 24.5% 0 0.0% 1 1.9% WASHINGTON COUNTY 164 100 61.0% 4 2.4% 53 32.3% 7 4.3% WICOMICO COUNTY 218 135 61.9% 65 29.8% 11 5.0% 7 3.2% WORCESTER COUNTY 394 311 78.9% 63 16.0% 11 2.8% 9 2.3% STATEWIDE JULY 2017 7464 4159 55.7% 1431 19.2% 1401 18.8% 470 6.3% Aug-17 ALLEGANY COUNTY 130 49 37.7% 22 16.9% 27 20.8% 32 24.6% ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

650 429 66.0% 176 27.1% 28 4.3% 17 2.6%

BALTIMORE CITY 1713 754 44.0% 205 12.0% 676 39.5% 78 4.6% BALTIMORE COUNTY 890 341 38.3% 167 18.8% 310 34.8% 72 8.1% CALVERT COUNTY 105 88 83.8% 17 16.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% CAROLINE COUNTY 42 23 54.8% 18 42.9% 1 2.4% 0 0.0% CARROLL COUNTY 101 72 71.3% 3 3.0% 20 19.8% 6 5.9% CECIL COUNTY 195 107 54.9% 73 37.4% 5 2.6% 10 5.1% CHARLES COUNTY 155 101 65.2% 49 31.6% 4 2.6% 1 0.6% DORCHESTER COUNTY 61 35 57.4% 21 34.4% 4 6.6% 1 1.6% FREDERICK COUNTY 157 112 71.3% 7 4.5% 31 19.7% 7 4.5% GARRETT COUNTY 45 22 48.9% 7 15.6% 6 13.3% 10 22.2% HARFORD COUNTY 171 85 49.7% 47 27.5% 24 14.0% 15 8.8% HOWARD COUNTY 179 102 57.0% 26 14.5% 33 18.4% 18 10.1%

94










KENT COUNTY 18 9 50.0% 9 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% MONTGOMERY COUNTY 724 457 63.1% 80 11.0% 131 18.1% 56 7.7% PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY

1041 539 51.8% 282 27.1% 122 11.7% 98 9.4%

QUEEN ANNES COUNTY 51 28 54.9% 19 37.3% 3 5.9% 1 2.0% SAINT MARYS COUNTY 105 89 84.8% 8 7.6% 8 7.6% 0 0.0% SOMERSET COUNTY 38 21 55.3% 13 34.2% 1 2.6% 2 5.3% TALBOT COUNTY 57 32 56.1% 20 35.1% 4 7.0% 1 1.8% WASHINGTON COUNTY 183 111 60.7% 4 2.2% 58 31.7% 10 5.5% WICOMICO COUNTY 208 104 50.0% 92 44.2% 6 2.9% 6 2.9% WORCESTER COUNTY 273 185 67.8% 81 29.7% 1 0.4% 6 2.2% STATEWIDE AUGUST 2017

7292 3895 53.4% 1446 19.8% 1503 20.6% 447 6.1%

Sep-17 ALLEGANY COUNTY 105 49 46.7% 21 20.0% 26 24.8% 9 8.6% ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

658 459 69.8% 170 25.8% 21 3.2% 8 1.2%


1070 578 54.0% 295 27.6% 119 11.1% 78 7.3%

95










QUEEN ANNES COUNTY 52 28 53.8% 24 46.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% SAINT MARYS COUNTY 115 97 84.3% 12 10.4% 3 2.6% 3 2.6% SOMERSET COUNTY 31 10 32.3% 18 58.1% 2 6.5% 1 3.2% TALBOT COUNTY 48 22 45.8% 23 47.9% 3 6.3% 0 0.0% WASHINGTON COUNTY 154 106 68.8% 9 5.8% 37 24.0% 2 1.3% WICOMICO COUNTY 219 107 48.9% 103 47.0% 7 3.2% 2 0.9% WORCESTER COUNTY 248 185 74.6% 59 23.8% 2 0.8% 2 0.8% STATEWIDE SEPTEMBER 2017

7001 3850 55.0% 1421 20.3% 1374 19.6% 356 5.1%

GRAND TOTALS 101,655 51,128 50.3% 26,391 26.0% 13,529 13.3% 10,583 10.4%

96

Table 8: Defendants Held in Custody for More than Five Days after Bail is Set, Criminal Cases: July 2016-September 2017 by Jurisdiction, Number and Percentage of Defendants Held in Custody for More than Five Days After Bail is Set (as a percentage of Initial Appearances)










ALLEGANY COUNTY 1779 742 41.7% 520 29.2% 217 12.2% 300 16.9%

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

9780 6425 65.7% 2475 25.3% 343 3.5% 527 5.4%

BALTIMORE CITY 23646 10066 42.6% 5590 23.6% 5102 21.6% 2888 12.2%


CALVERT COUNTY 1587 1104 69.6% 384 24.2% 25 1.6% 74 4.7%

CAROLINE COUNTY 681 387 56.8% 263 38.6% 19 2.8% 12 1.8%

CARROLL COUNTY 1453 889 61.2% 190 13.1% 242 16.7% 132 9.1%

CECIL COUNTY 2278 1184 52.0% 871 38.2% 62 2.7% 161 7.1%

CHARLES COUNTY 2645 1678 63.4% 789 29.8% 65 2.5% 111 4.2%



GARRETT COUNTY 391 196 50.1% 89 22.8% 49 12.5% 57 14.6%

HARFORD COUNTY 2493 1337 53.6% 607 24.3% 241 9.7% 308 12.4%

HOWARD COUNTY 2719 1492 54.9% 656 24.1% 285 10.5% 286 10.5%

KENT COUNTY 269 118 43.9% 132 49.1% 6 2.2% 13 4.8%

MONTGOMERY COUNTY 9425 4809 51.0% 2134 22.6% 1209 12.8% 1273 13.5%


14974 6918 46.2% 4737 31.6% 1396 9.3% 1923 12.8%

QUEEN ANNES COUNTY 763 385 50.5% 327 42.9% 26 3.4% 25 3.3%

SAINT MARYS COUNTY 1594 1162 72.9% 296 18.6% 46 2.9% 85 5.3%

SOMERSET COUNTY 558 251 45.0% 228 40.9% 21 3.8% 53 9.5%

97










TALBOT COUNTY 843 519 61.6% 277 32.9% 25 3.0% 23 2.7%

WASHINGTON COUNTY 2322 1278 55.0% 287 12.4% 515 22.2% 242 10.4%

WICOMICO COUNTY 2866 1416 49.4% 1150 40.1% 85 3.0% 214 7.5%


GRAND TOTAL 101,655 51,128 50.3% 26,391 26.0% 13,529 13.3% 10,583 10.4%


44.6% 31.9% 6.5% 17.0%


52.4% 23.8% 15.8% 8.0%

impact of changes to pretrial release rulesregarding pretrial release and the use of cash bail...

Documents