improving handover in the ed setting “sbar“

18
Improving handover in the ED setting “SBAR“

Upload: robert

Post on 23-Feb-2016

147 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Improving handover in the ED setting “SBAR“. Objectives of the “ SBAR Squad from A&E ”. Where we are Where we need to be What do our staff think How far have we got Where are we going. TAPS questions (Additional). “ The SBAR Squad from A&E ” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

Improving handover in the ED setting

“SBAR“

Page 2: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

Objectives of the “SBAR Squad from A&E”

• Where we are• Where we need to be• What do our staff think• How far have we got• Where are we going

Page 3: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

TAPS questions (Additional)

• “The SBAR Squad from A&E”• What we were trying to achieve and

why it was important:

• What worked well:

• What we have learned to take this forward:

Page 4: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

Where we are?

Page 5: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

Our Objective:

To deliver high quality, evidence-based, effective, efficient and

patient-centred care for ALL patients in the Emergency Department.

PHASE 1INITIAL ASSESSMENT

• Assessment - initial (complaint, physiology and allocate prioritisation)

• Planning -(investigations needed/ordered, obvious decision to admit - DTA, start now if appropriate)

• Treatment - (immediate treatment/resuscitation required)

PHASE 2 DETAILED ASSESSMENT & TREATMENT

• Detailed assessment• Chase results

of investigations ordered• Instigate further

investigations if required EARLY

• Start treatment plan• Management plan

defined and delivered (with diagnosis, treatment plan and discharge plan)

PHASE 3 MANAGEMENT & DISCHARGE PLANNING

PHASE 4 ED EXIT – PLANNING &

DELIVERY –SBAR

Start Processes To:A) Discharge Home from

ED using SBARB) Admit to In-hospital

Specialty Bed Base SBARC) Admit to ED Observation

Ward/CDU SBAR

If delay in discharge from ED for any reason, inform appropriate person.

TARGET TIMES TO SEE A DOCTOR DAILY & WEEKLY PERFORMANCE RESULTS

FOR EACH PHASE

STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EVALUATION IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

0-15min window 15mins-90mins Window

90mins-3hrs Window

3-4hr window

• ED Senior Nurse SBAR• ED SpR or Cons SBAR• Duty Bed Manager• If there is a breach

(>4hrs in the Dept) in your area, please identify ways to prevent it in the future)

Category 1 (Resuscitation) = ImmediateCategory 2 (Emergency) = Within 10minsCategory 3 (Urgent) = Within 1hrCategory 4 (Non-urgent) = Within 1hr

Patient arrival to discharge MUST BE WITHIN 4 HRS for all patients.

If delay in discharge from ED for any reason, inform appropriate person.

Our Target:

Page 6: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

What are the causes of error Fletcher NPSA 2008

Page 7: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

Juliette Cosgrove: Q. “are we reporting enough?”

Page 8: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

UCD IR1s 2011 [chart]

Page 9: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

Knowledge application

Process & system design

Measuringsuccess

Teamworking & LEADERSHIP

Training

Where we need to be

Page 10: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

What do our staff think?“a methodical order:name, age, gender, condition, plan, any risk to staff or patient” - nurse, grade 5.

“simple clear patient details - complaint \ problem \ plan \ what needed \ & additional info.” – CSW.

“everyone needs to handover following the same structure in the trust.” – Sister grade 6.

“any further documentation needs to be short & concise. Already stress on 'time factors' with many other requirements for patients in ED; throughout [ED] stay and d/c to ward.” – Sister grade 7.“S: PC B: Meds & PMH A: impression / exam R: plan “ - SpR in ED.

Page 11: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

What do our staff think?Q1. The Emergency Department is a busy environment where the safety systems in place are robust and require no change.

Please indicate the level of risk you perceive to be associated with the following patient events :Q12. Discussion with other speciality nursing or medical colleagues In the hospital.

1 Strongly Disagree

2 3 4 5Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly

Agree

1 2 3 4 5

Low Risk   Moderate   High Risk

    Risk  

Page 12: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

How far have we got?

• Audit ( ED Cons Shift Team Leader snapshots x2)

• SBAR templates for key areas of the ED• Developing context specific SBAR

Page 13: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

Audit of practice

• Applied a development SBAR tool ( sticker in the ED notes)

• 10% and 15% adherence – not good!

• Positives:– Allowed refinement of tool– Embedded SBAR in minds of staff– Led to discussion and outcome to embed in

ED notes

Page 14: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

EMERGENCY DEPT PLANNING &

HANDOVER

Situation•Likely diagnosis &other possible Dx?

Background•Co-morbidities?

Assessment•Present physiology (MEWS, GCS)?•Active problems•Investigations completed & those still required?

Recommendations•Acute therapy given?•Further therapy required and when?•Handover to (their name, grade, specialty) : •Your name, grade & time of referral?

SBAR template embedded into ED Notes

Page 15: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

Senior Handover SBAR

Page 16: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

SBAR for CDU protocols

Page 17: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

SSITUATION

NameAgeConsultantDiagnosisTreatment / InterventionsResuscitation Status

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BBACKGROUND

Relevant medical history / surgical historyMedical / AHP consultationsPrevious tests / treatmentsPsychosocial issuesAllergies

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

AASSESSMENT

Physical assessmentMental health assessment / cognitionVital signs / O2 requirementsLines - IV, CVC, PICC, ArterialPain score / analgesiaWounds / pressure ulcersDrains or tubesMobility Nutritional statusRisk assessments (MEWS, MUST, VIP scores, MRSA/ decolonisation status and falls assessment.) Pathology resultsPatient /carer education

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

RRECOMMENDATION

Care plan /care pathwayOrders needing completionPending treatments or testsDischarge planning

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

RREADBACK

Oncoming staff (listener) confirms understanding of recommendations

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 18: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

Where are we going!

• Embedding SBAR into ED notes• Developing context specific SBAR within

umbrella of improved handover• Development of better communications

with rest of hospital around SBAR• Developing a tool for adherence and

quality of content of SBAR in context specific situations