improving instruction: metaliteracy through crowdsourcing in the classroom

33
August 1, 2014

Upload: ilana-stonebraker

Post on 04-Jul-2015

241 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Presentation at Indiana University Libraries Information Literacy Colloquium- August 1 2014 Presented research from Chris Gibson's summer undergraduate DURI project

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

August 1, 2014

Page 2: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

4

• Explore–How Crowdsourcing Reflects Metaliteracy

–How Metaliteracy Informs Crowdsourcing

Today’s Learning Objectives

Page 3: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

5

“Metaliteracy expands the scope of traditional information skills (determine, access, locate, understand, produce, and use information) to include the collaborative production and sharing of information in participatory digital environments (collaborate, participate, produce, and share)” (p. 1)

Page 4: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

6

• Goal 3: Share information and collaborate in a variety of participatory environments

• Goal 4: Demonstrate ability to connect learning and research strategies with lifelong learning processes and personal, academic, and professional goals

Metaliteracy Learning Objectives

Page 5: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

7

Crowdsourcing is an “online distributed problem-solving and production model that leverages the collective intelligence of online communities to serve specific organizational goals.”

Page 6: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

8

What’s going on?A shift in how media travels across the culture.

Distribution as we have traditionally understood it in the era of mass media where content flows in patterns regulated by decisions made by major corporations who control what we see, when we see it and under what conditions.

Circulation, a hybrid system, still shaped top-down by corporate players, but also bottom-up by networks of everyday people, who are seeking to move media that is meaningful to them across their social networks, and will take media where they want it when they want it through means both legal and illegal.

Page 7: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

10

As the student landscape changes, so must education. Participatory culture and technology has created a new dimension to education. Crowdsourcing is a way to utilize the resources available to educators and students. This talk will focus on how changes in education methods with the ability to create success in the classroom and office.

Summary

Page 8: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

11

• My Grandfather

• My Parents

The Smartest People I Know

Page 9: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

13

Page 10: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

14

Page 11: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

15

Page 12: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

16

• Distributive

– Written Word

– Library at Alexandria

– World Book

• Circulation

– Internet

• What’s Next?

History of Media

Page 13: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

17

• Outdated

• Educators Themselves

• Students Ourselves

– Already Participating Elsewhere

Problems With Education

Page 14: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

18

1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000Zetta Exa Peta Tera Giga Mega Kilo Hecto

Page 15: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

19

• Outdated

• Educators Themselves

• Students Ourselves

Problems With Education

Page 16: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

20

The shift towards a circulation-based model for media access is disrupting and transforming

Page 17: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

21

• “Rather, their untouchable quality has to do with the contexts within which we are introduced to these texts and the stained glass attitudesthat too often surround them.”

Page 18: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

22

Page 19: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

23

• Educate the Educators

• Add Technology to the Classroom

• Change the Focus

• Acknowledge the Changing Power Dynamics of Information

How We Can Fix it

Page 20: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

24

• Use Other People to Help Find Information

• Combining of Resources

Crowdsourcing

Page 21: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

25

• Answer Systems

• Working Together

• Letting go of the Untouchable Quality of theScholarly and the Academic

How This Works

Page 22: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

26

• Never Work Alone

– Not always working in formal environment

• Create New Professional Interactions in Classroom

• Questions Social Hegemony

• Less Person to Person, More Person to Information

Real Life, Professional Impacts

Page 23: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

27

• Crowdsourced Answer System for Purdue

• Students Ask and Answer Each Other’s Questions

• Intertwines Learning and Educating

CrowdAsk

Page 24: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

28

Page 25: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom
Page 26: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

30

• Allow Students to Educate Teachers

• Learning is not a One-Way Street

• Utilize all Tools Available, Including Students

What Now?

Page 27: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

31

• Versed With Participatory Culture and Technology

• Learning is Easier at a Younger Age

Why Students?

Page 28: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

32

Crowdsourcing Could Replace Single User, Learner

What Does a Circulation Classroom Look Like? How is it Different From a Classroom Based on the Distribution Model?

In The Future

Page 29: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

33

• Education, student, media changing

– Distribution vs. Circulation Model

– High v. Low Academic Participatory Culture

• Crowdsourcing Reflects Metaliteracy

• Metaliteracy Informs Crowdsourcing

Page 30: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

34

• Crowdsourcing Benefits Metaliteracy

• Metaliteracy Benefits Crowdsourcing

• Combination Benefits Students

Conclusion

Page 31: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

Thank you!Questions?

Page 32: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

36

• http://henryjenkins.org/2006/07/can_one_be_a_fan_of_high_art.html#sthash.wzOwwa8e.7RM7Pcz7.dpuf• http://indiamond6.ulib.iupui.edu/cdm/fullbrowser/collection/IUPUIphotos/id/6149/rv/singleitem• http://incitemag.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/large_lecture.jpgIMPACT PITCURE• http://www.kshs.org/kansapedia/graphics/one_room_school_house.jpg• http://www.summeroflove.org/images/altman/how.do.sm.jpeg• http://www.housing.wisc.edu/media/photos/tlc_imacs2.jpg• http://www.fcps.edu/SunriseValleyES/tech/AllenLaptopsClass1.JPG• https://www.flickr.com/photos/shadows44/2899146693/in/photolist-9x7YM-5qbTiP-6v9qou-7hzVzt-ecDTJ9-

hNPqvR-7xDRkt-6SVLqU-36c9Ss-2qcWRq-2k2DAk-4PNy4j-f5znFM-4PNxK7-4PJi1X-HZobr-5SrT8B-3AXJ3Z-YEg2o-85FpbS-desc6m-7MFAH-bviuTp-dA9fPg-66huNZ-2NGm6A-fGEqGQ-c12P7L-PvbMo-grouAj-Kbko1-8MjasH-52RshH-dVqp4X-aCtUm8-8Mjd4D-6ew98c-A6pFn-5ZjeK3-aTmoz4-4vAgep-2F1Jcq-hobayK-4T8Cja-aSoeiF-55mGnG-mEisj-3c27hQ-cp4xWA-fjQQn4/

• http://www.otis.edu/library/craap-detection-criteria-evaluating-information• https://sites.lib.purdue.edu/crowdask/index.php?qa=questions&sort=hot• https://sites.lib.purdue.edu/crowdask/index.php?qa=68&qa_1=does-online-library-website-place-learn-cite-

citation-format

Image Credits

Page 33: Improving Instruction: Metaliteracy Through Crowdsourcing in the Classroom

37

• Brabham, D. C. (). Crowdsourcing. : MIT Press.• CRAAP Detection: Criteria for Evaluating Information. (n.d.). Otis College of Art and Design. Retrieved July 31,

2014, from http://www.otis.edu/library/craap-detection-criteria-evaluating-information• Flaherty, C. (2013, June 17). Data suggest baby boomer faculty are putting off retirement. Data suggest baby

boomer faculty are putting off retirement. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/06/17/data-suggest-baby-boomer-faculty-are-putting-retirement#sthash.WhxzCajj.dpbsKepple, T. (2012, May 28). Gray-haired college faculty should make room for the next generation. PennLive.com. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from http://www.pennlive.com/editorials/index.ssf/2012/05/gray-haired_faculty_should_mak.htm

• In 2013 the amount of data generated worldwide will reach four zettabytes. (n.d.). VSAT Global Series Blog. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from http://vsatglobalseriesblog.wordpress.com/2013/06/21/in-2013-the-amount-of-data-generated-worldwide-will-reach-four-zettabytes

• Jenkins, H. (2006, July 26). Can One Be A Fan of High Art?. Confessions of an AcaFan. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from http://henryjenkins.org/2006/07/can_one_be_a_fan_of_high_art.html#sthash.wzOwwa8e.7RM7Pcz7.dpuf

• Mackey, T. P., & Jacobson, T. (2014). Metaliteracy: reinventing information literacy to empower learners. London: Facet Publishing.

• Megabytes, Gigabytes, Terabytes... What Are They?. (n.d.). Megabytes, Gigabytes, Terabytes. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from http://www.whatsabyte.com

• Table 2.Average and median age of public school teachers and percentage distribution of teachers, by age category, sex, and state: 2011–12. (n.d.). Table 2.Average and median age of public school teachers and percentage distribution of teachers, by age category, sex, and state: 2011–12. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/sass/tables/sass1112_2013314_t1s_002.asp

Sources