incineration technologies and approaches · 2017. 3. 16. · – salt mine • spent activated...

35
25th February 2017 | German-Iranian Workshop on Waste Management Concepts & Technologies Incineration Technologies and Approaches Vinzenz Schulte German Association of Waste-to-Energy Plants ITAD e.V.

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jan-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 25th February 2017 | German-Iranian Workshop on Waste Management Concepts & Technologies

    Incineration Technologies and Approaches

    Vinzenz SchulteGerman Association of Waste-to-Energy Plants

    ITAD e.V.

  • about ITAD

    ITAD-topics

    • Technology

    • Recovery of Residues

    • Sustainability

    • Communication

    • Legal and Taxes

    • …

    German Association of Waste-to-Energy Plants (est. 1999)Incinerators (MSWI) and Refuse Derived Fuel Incinerators (RDFI)

    Our members operate / own80 WtE plants with ~ 7.000 employeesOffering 90% of German incineration capacity

    Private, Public and PPP (mixed) companies

  • • Overview Waste-to-Energy in Germany

    – History

    – Installations in Germany

    – Purpose of WtE plants

    – Waste input

    • Waste to Energy – How does it work?

    – Incineration process

    – Emissions

    – Residues

    • Energy Efficiency and Climate Protection Potential

    – Energy output

    – WtE-GHG Savings in Germany

    • Barriers for Waste-to-Energy

    Contents

  • Overview Waste-to-Energy in Germany

  • History

    • Waste incineration was common in the Roman Empire

    • After downfall of the Roman Empire waste incineration

    falls into oblivion

    Plague and Cholera in the middle ages

    • Collection of municipal waste in the cities

    in the 16th century (landfilling outside the cities)

    • First waste incinerator ‚Destructor‘ in Nottingham 1874

    • Waste incineration in Germany started end of 19th century

    Hamburg 1894

  • Energy Recovery from waste

    Different energy recovery routes

    for biodegradable waste, municipal solid waste and similar commercial waste established in Germany

    – Biomass incineration (e.g. wood, waste wood etc.)

    – Anaerobic digestion and fermentation of wet biomass (waste)

    – Waste-to-Energy plants (WtE-plants)

    • Municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI)

    • Mono-Incineration of refuse derived fuel (RDF-incineration)

    – Co-Incineration of solid recovered fuel (SRF)

    • Cement and lime kilns

    • Coal fired power plants

  • Development of WtE in Germany

    Sino-German Workshop on the Application of CDM in the Construction Sector Qinhuangdao, 2008-11-25

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    Anzahl

    Kapazität

    1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2008

    67Number of plants

    Capacity

    MSWI and RDF plants(Municipal Solid Waste Incineration / Refused Derived Fuel)

  • 66 MSWI 19,9 Mio. Mg

    average age: 19,5 years

    35 RDF 5,4 Mio. Mg

    average age: 8,5 years

    Co-Incineration

    ~ 33 cement and lime3,1 Mio. Mg (2014)

    ~ 11 coal fired powerplant

    1,1 Mio. Mg (2013)

    MVA

    EBS-KW

    Co-Incineration

    source: Prognos, Würzburg Sept. 2016

    Installations in Germany today

    8

    MSWI

  • Purpose of WtE plants

    • Sanitation

    • Volume reduction

    • Permanent elimination of pollutants from cycle of materials

    • Minimisation of emissions

    • Efficient use of the energy content of waste

    • Contribution to climate protection (substitution of fossil

    fuels)

    • Contribution to sustainable waste management (recovery of

    metals from bottom ash and reuse of bottom ash as

    secondary raw material)

  • Waste input

    Waste type Million tonnes

    Household Waste 12.23

    RDF/pretreated 7.26

    Other MSW 0.95

    Hazardous Waste 0.32

    Sewage Slugde 0.2

    Other Waste 2.39

    Total 23.35

  • Waste-to-EnergyHow does it work?

  • Plant overview

    A WtE incinerates the waste, then recovers its energy,

    metals and mineralic contents and finally cleans the Flue

    Gas

    Waste Deliveryand storage

    Flue Gas Cleaning

    Incineration, steam generating Energy

    Recovery

  • Incineration

    Grate

    Waste Storage

    Feed Hopper

    Combustion Chamber

    Bottom Ash Collection for recovery

    13

  • Incineration

    Grate

    Waste Storage

    Feed Hopper

    Combustion Chamber

    Bottom Ash Collection for recovery (metals and construction material)

    14

    Waste input (examples):• Municipal solid waste and similar

    commercial waste• Bulky waste from households• Demolition and construction waste (non

    mineral)• Non recyclable packaging waste• Sorting residues from commercial

    waste• Calorific residues from MBT and

    composting plants (impurities)

    Not accepted:• Non combustible waste, soil, concrete,

    asbestos, sand, stones, free-flowingsludges etc.

    • Bulky metal waste (fridges, cars,..)• Self-igniting, explosive or highly

    flammable waste• Radioactive or infectious waste

  • Incineration

    Grate

    Waste Storage

    Feed Hopper

    Combustion Chamber

    Bottom Ash Collection for recovery (metals and construction material)

    15

  • Incineration

    Grate

    Waste Storage

    Feed Hopper

    Combustion Chamber

    Bottom Ash Collection for recovery (metals and construction material)

    16

  • Incineration

    Grate

    Waste Storage

    Feed Hopper

    Combustion Chamber

    Bottom Ash Collection for recovery (metals and construction material)

    17

    the waste is incinerated on a grate

  • Incineration Chamber

    T > 1000 °C

    Approx. 1 h

    De-Asher (water)

    Energy Recovery

    Economizer

    Superheater (40 bar/400°C)

    Boiler drum

    Turbine and electric

    generator

    Heat

    (district heating and cooling, industrial processes, water desalination and many other purposes)

    Power

    Primary combustion air(4.000 -6.000 m3/twaste)

    the heat generated by incineration is transferred into a boiler

  • 19

    Flue Gas Cleaning

    Cleaned Gas (mostly water vapour and CO2)

    Scrubber(for acid gases, such as HCl and SO2)

    Fabric Filter(for particles, dioxins, heavy metals)

    Fly ash storage(for disposal)

    Some pollutants contained in the waste are released into the

    flue gas, which must be cleaned before exiting the plant

  • Emissions

    dust

    • Emission limits for WtE are the strictest of any combustion industry

    • Annual load negligible compared to other sources

    • “Dioxins emitted from Energy-from-Waste are not an issue”, stated

    the German Environment Ministry in 2005

    Operational Emission Values compared to Limit Values

  • Residues

    1000 kgwaste

    Bottom ash200-300 kg

    Boiler Ash5-10kg

    combustion and boiler

    Wet Flue Gas Cleaning

    Activated carbon reactor

    Dust10-30 kg

    Salts5-20 kg

    Solid APC residues(40-70) 50-90 kg

    (Semi) Dry Flue Gas Cleaning

    spent activatedcarbon2-5 kg

    APC (Air Pollution Control) ResiduesIncineration Residues

  • Disposal/Recovery of APC residues

    • boiler & fly ash:

    – salt mines

    – landfill for hazardous waste

    • salts:

    – salt mine

    • spent activated carbon:

    – Incineration

    – Regeneration

    • bottom ash:

    – recovery of metals and non-magnetic metals

    – secondary raw material e.g. for road construction,

    noise protection walls and other technical applications

  • Bottom Ash is a Ressource

    5 mio. t minerals

    500.000 t ferrous metalrecovery rate: 82 %

    60.000 t non-ferrous metalrecovery rate: 56 %

    High Quality secondary raw material(pollutants/adhesions removed in the incineration)

    Source: Kuchta, Enzner - EdDE-Dokumentation 17

    23

  • Energy EfficiencyandClimate Protection Potential

  • Energy produced and exported

  • CO2 balance - net climate effect 2015

    Sources: Bilitewski (2011), UBA (2014), EdDE, own calculations

    CO2eq emissions

    waste inputsmass

    [t]

    emission factorsum

    [t CO2eq][t CO2eq/t waste]

    Houshold Waste 12.230.000 0,315 3.852.450

    RDF 7.260.000 0,468 3.397.680

    other waste 3.860.000 0,446 1.721.560

    23.350.000 0,384 8.971.690

    (weighted average)

    emissions of imported energy (estimate) 200.000

    CO2eq savings (german energy mix)

    energy outputsamount[MWh]

    substitutionsum

    [t CO2eq][t CO2eq/ MWh]

    Electricity (produced) 10.130.000 -0,806 -8.164.780

    Process Steam (export) 13.210.000 -0,360 -4.755.600

    District Heating (exp.) 8.310.000 -0,296 -2.459.760

    total 31.650.000 -0,486 -15.380.140

    subsitution by metal recovery from bottom ash -1.170.000

    net emissions -7.378.450

  • CO2 balance - net climate effect 2015

    Sources: Bilitewski (2011), UBA (2014), EdDE, own calculations

    CO2eq emissions

    waste inputsmass

    [t]

    emission factorsum

    [t CO2eq][t CO2eq/t waste]

    Houshold Waste 12.230.000 0,315 3.852.450

    RDF 7.260.000 0,468 3.397.680

    other waste 3.860.000 0,446 1.721.560

    23.350.000 0,384 8.971.690

    (weighted average)

    emissions of imported energy (estimate) 200.000

    CO2eq savings (german energy mix)

    energy outputsamount[MWh]

    substitutionsum

    [t CO2eq][t CO2eq/ MWh]

    Electricity (produced) 10.130.000 -0,806 -8.164.780

    Process Steam (export) 13.210.000 -0,360 -4.755.600

    District Heating (exp.) 8.310.000 -0,296 -2.459.760

    total 31.650.000 -0,486 -15.380.140

    subsitution by metal recovery from bottom ash -1.170.000

    net emissions -7.378.450

    net avoided emissions:

    7,4 million tonnes CO2eq

    =0,316 t CO2eq/t waste

    +avoided by not landfilling

    15,3 million tonnes CO2eq

    =0,660 t Co2eq/t waste

    balance compared to landfilling

    22,7 million tonnes CO2eq

    =~ 1 t CO2eq/t waste

  • Barriersfor Waste-to-Energy

  • • Missing energy users?

    • High investment costs?

    • „God recycles, devil burns“ ideology?

    • Public acceptance?

    Potential Barriers

  • Missing energy users?

    Integrated development

    where possible

  • High costs

    Low impact

    Low costs

    High impact

    Low costs

    Low impact

    High costs

    High impact

    Additional costs

    Environm

    enta

    l advanta

    ge

    High investment costs?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

  • Waste to Energy and Recycling go hand in hand

    Recycling vs. WtE?

    28

    1 1 1 1 24

    8

    17 18

    26 2834

    3942

    4953 55

    56 5960

    74 7679 80 81 82

    8388

    3

    49

    27

    5045

    54

    35

    4838

    56

    50

    35

    3527

    21

    18

    21 1512

    1810 9

    2

    12 13

    46

    54

    6

    4450

    55

    44

    64

    51

    58

    3733

    47

    3945 45

    61

    40

    30 32 33

    2531 31

    25

    12

    21 19 1915 17

    12

    54

    43 45

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    Landfill (%)

    Waste-to-Energy (%)

    Recycling + composting (%)

    Municipal waste treatment in Europe in 2015(data: Eurostat, graph: cewep)

  • Energy from Waste – clean and safe

    Public acceptance?

  • 25th February 2017 | German-Iranian Workshop on Waste Management Concepts & Technologies

    Thank you for listening.

    Further questions?

    Contact us!

    itad.de | [email protected]

    Peter-Müller-Straße 16a40468 Düsseldorf

    +49 (0) 211 93 67 609 0