incineration technologies and approaches · 2017. 3. 16. · – salt mine • spent activated...
TRANSCRIPT
-
25th February 2017 | German-Iranian Workshop on Waste Management Concepts & Technologies
Incineration Technologies and Approaches
Vinzenz SchulteGerman Association of Waste-to-Energy Plants
ITAD e.V.
-
about ITAD
ITAD-topics
• Technology
• Recovery of Residues
• Sustainability
• Communication
• Legal and Taxes
• …
German Association of Waste-to-Energy Plants (est. 1999)Incinerators (MSWI) and Refuse Derived Fuel Incinerators (RDFI)
Our members operate / own80 WtE plants with ~ 7.000 employeesOffering 90% of German incineration capacity
Private, Public and PPP (mixed) companies
-
• Overview Waste-to-Energy in Germany
– History
– Installations in Germany
– Purpose of WtE plants
– Waste input
• Waste to Energy – How does it work?
– Incineration process
– Emissions
– Residues
• Energy Efficiency and Climate Protection Potential
– Energy output
– WtE-GHG Savings in Germany
• Barriers for Waste-to-Energy
Contents
-
Overview Waste-to-Energy in Germany
-
History
• Waste incineration was common in the Roman Empire
• After downfall of the Roman Empire waste incineration
falls into oblivion
Plague and Cholera in the middle ages
• Collection of municipal waste in the cities
in the 16th century (landfilling outside the cities)
• First waste incinerator ‚Destructor‘ in Nottingham 1874
• Waste incineration in Germany started end of 19th century
Hamburg 1894
-
Energy Recovery from waste
Different energy recovery routes
for biodegradable waste, municipal solid waste and similar commercial waste established in Germany
– Biomass incineration (e.g. wood, waste wood etc.)
– Anaerobic digestion and fermentation of wet biomass (waste)
– Waste-to-Energy plants (WtE-plants)
• Municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI)
• Mono-Incineration of refuse derived fuel (RDF-incineration)
– Co-Incineration of solid recovered fuel (SRF)
• Cement and lime kilns
• Coal fired power plants
-
Development of WtE in Germany
Sino-German Workshop on the Application of CDM in the Construction Sector Qinhuangdao, 2008-11-25
0
20
40
60
80
0
5
10
15
20
Anzahl
Kapazität
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2008
67Number of plants
Capacity
MSWI and RDF plants(Municipal Solid Waste Incineration / Refused Derived Fuel)
-
66 MSWI 19,9 Mio. Mg
average age: 19,5 years
35 RDF 5,4 Mio. Mg
average age: 8,5 years
Co-Incineration
~ 33 cement and lime3,1 Mio. Mg (2014)
~ 11 coal fired powerplant
1,1 Mio. Mg (2013)
MVA
EBS-KW
Co-Incineration
source: Prognos, Würzburg Sept. 2016
Installations in Germany today
8
MSWI
-
Purpose of WtE plants
• Sanitation
• Volume reduction
• Permanent elimination of pollutants from cycle of materials
• Minimisation of emissions
• Efficient use of the energy content of waste
• Contribution to climate protection (substitution of fossil
fuels)
• Contribution to sustainable waste management (recovery of
metals from bottom ash and reuse of bottom ash as
secondary raw material)
-
Waste input
Waste type Million tonnes
Household Waste 12.23
RDF/pretreated 7.26
Other MSW 0.95
Hazardous Waste 0.32
Sewage Slugde 0.2
Other Waste 2.39
Total 23.35
-
Waste-to-EnergyHow does it work?
-
Plant overview
A WtE incinerates the waste, then recovers its energy,
metals and mineralic contents and finally cleans the Flue
Gas
Waste Deliveryand storage
Flue Gas Cleaning
Incineration, steam generating Energy
Recovery
-
Incineration
Grate
Waste Storage
Feed Hopper
Combustion Chamber
Bottom Ash Collection for recovery
13
-
Incineration
Grate
Waste Storage
Feed Hopper
Combustion Chamber
Bottom Ash Collection for recovery (metals and construction material)
14
Waste input (examples):• Municipal solid waste and similar
commercial waste• Bulky waste from households• Demolition and construction waste (non
mineral)• Non recyclable packaging waste• Sorting residues from commercial
waste• Calorific residues from MBT and
composting plants (impurities)
Not accepted:• Non combustible waste, soil, concrete,
asbestos, sand, stones, free-flowingsludges etc.
• Bulky metal waste (fridges, cars,..)• Self-igniting, explosive or highly
flammable waste• Radioactive or infectious waste
-
Incineration
Grate
Waste Storage
Feed Hopper
Combustion Chamber
Bottom Ash Collection for recovery (metals and construction material)
15
-
Incineration
Grate
Waste Storage
Feed Hopper
Combustion Chamber
Bottom Ash Collection for recovery (metals and construction material)
16
-
Incineration
Grate
Waste Storage
Feed Hopper
Combustion Chamber
Bottom Ash Collection for recovery (metals and construction material)
17
the waste is incinerated on a grate
-
Incineration Chamber
T > 1000 °C
Approx. 1 h
De-Asher (water)
Energy Recovery
Economizer
Superheater (40 bar/400°C)
Boiler drum
Turbine and electric
generator
Heat
(district heating and cooling, industrial processes, water desalination and many other purposes)
Power
Primary combustion air(4.000 -6.000 m3/twaste)
the heat generated by incineration is transferred into a boiler
-
19
Flue Gas Cleaning
Cleaned Gas (mostly water vapour and CO2)
Scrubber(for acid gases, such as HCl and SO2)
Fabric Filter(for particles, dioxins, heavy metals)
Fly ash storage(for disposal)
Some pollutants contained in the waste are released into the
flue gas, which must be cleaned before exiting the plant
-
Emissions
dust
• Emission limits for WtE are the strictest of any combustion industry
• Annual load negligible compared to other sources
• “Dioxins emitted from Energy-from-Waste are not an issue”, stated
the German Environment Ministry in 2005
Operational Emission Values compared to Limit Values
-
Residues
1000 kgwaste
Bottom ash200-300 kg
Boiler Ash5-10kg
combustion and boiler
Wet Flue Gas Cleaning
Activated carbon reactor
Dust10-30 kg
Salts5-20 kg
Solid APC residues(40-70) 50-90 kg
(Semi) Dry Flue Gas Cleaning
spent activatedcarbon2-5 kg
APC (Air Pollution Control) ResiduesIncineration Residues
-
Disposal/Recovery of APC residues
• boiler & fly ash:
– salt mines
– landfill for hazardous waste
• salts:
– salt mine
• spent activated carbon:
– Incineration
– Regeneration
• bottom ash:
– recovery of metals and non-magnetic metals
– secondary raw material e.g. for road construction,
noise protection walls and other technical applications
-
Bottom Ash is a Ressource
5 mio. t minerals
500.000 t ferrous metalrecovery rate: 82 %
60.000 t non-ferrous metalrecovery rate: 56 %
High Quality secondary raw material(pollutants/adhesions removed in the incineration)
Source: Kuchta, Enzner - EdDE-Dokumentation 17
23
-
Energy EfficiencyandClimate Protection Potential
-
Energy produced and exported
-
CO2 balance - net climate effect 2015
Sources: Bilitewski (2011), UBA (2014), EdDE, own calculations
CO2eq emissions
waste inputsmass
[t]
emission factorsum
[t CO2eq][t CO2eq/t waste]
Houshold Waste 12.230.000 0,315 3.852.450
RDF 7.260.000 0,468 3.397.680
other waste 3.860.000 0,446 1.721.560
23.350.000 0,384 8.971.690
(weighted average)
emissions of imported energy (estimate) 200.000
CO2eq savings (german energy mix)
energy outputsamount[MWh]
substitutionsum
[t CO2eq][t CO2eq/ MWh]
Electricity (produced) 10.130.000 -0,806 -8.164.780
Process Steam (export) 13.210.000 -0,360 -4.755.600
District Heating (exp.) 8.310.000 -0,296 -2.459.760
total 31.650.000 -0,486 -15.380.140
subsitution by metal recovery from bottom ash -1.170.000
net emissions -7.378.450
-
CO2 balance - net climate effect 2015
Sources: Bilitewski (2011), UBA (2014), EdDE, own calculations
CO2eq emissions
waste inputsmass
[t]
emission factorsum
[t CO2eq][t CO2eq/t waste]
Houshold Waste 12.230.000 0,315 3.852.450
RDF 7.260.000 0,468 3.397.680
other waste 3.860.000 0,446 1.721.560
23.350.000 0,384 8.971.690
(weighted average)
emissions of imported energy (estimate) 200.000
CO2eq savings (german energy mix)
energy outputsamount[MWh]
substitutionsum
[t CO2eq][t CO2eq/ MWh]
Electricity (produced) 10.130.000 -0,806 -8.164.780
Process Steam (export) 13.210.000 -0,360 -4.755.600
District Heating (exp.) 8.310.000 -0,296 -2.459.760
total 31.650.000 -0,486 -15.380.140
subsitution by metal recovery from bottom ash -1.170.000
net emissions -7.378.450
net avoided emissions:
7,4 million tonnes CO2eq
=0,316 t CO2eq/t waste
+avoided by not landfilling
15,3 million tonnes CO2eq
=0,660 t Co2eq/t waste
balance compared to landfilling
22,7 million tonnes CO2eq
=~ 1 t CO2eq/t waste
-
Barriersfor Waste-to-Energy
-
• Missing energy users?
• High investment costs?
• „God recycles, devil burns“ ideology?
• Public acceptance?
Potential Barriers
-
Missing energy users?
Integrated development
where possible
-
High costs
Low impact
Low costs
High impact
Low costs
Low impact
High costs
High impact
Additional costs
Environm
enta
l advanta
ge
High investment costs?
?
?
?
?
-
Waste to Energy and Recycling go hand in hand
Recycling vs. WtE?
28
1 1 1 1 24
8
17 18
26 2834
3942
4953 55
56 5960
74 7679 80 81 82
8388
3
49
27
5045
54
35
4838
56
50
35
3527
21
18
21 1512
1810 9
2
12 13
46
54
6
4450
55
44
64
51
58
3733
47
3945 45
61
40
30 32 33
2531 31
25
12
21 19 1915 17
12
54
43 45
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Landfill (%)
Waste-to-Energy (%)
Recycling + composting (%)
Municipal waste treatment in Europe in 2015(data: Eurostat, graph: cewep)
-
Energy from Waste – clean and safe
Public acceptance?
-
25th February 2017 | German-Iranian Workshop on Waste Management Concepts & Technologies
Thank you for listening.
Further questions?
Contact us!
itad.de | [email protected]
Peter-Müller-Straße 16a40468 Düsseldorf
+49 (0) 211 93 67 609 0