indiana dunes national lakeshore charles nelson home
DESCRIPTION
Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Charles Nelson Home. The Dunes Team Patrick Brown Andrew Johnson Alex Kampf Benjamin Kepchar. Agenda. Stakeholders Context Constraints Deliverables Alternative Energy Wastewater Treatment. Stakeholders. Purdue University - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Indiana Dunes National LakeshoreCharles Nelson Home
The Dunes Team• Patrick Brown• Andrew Johnson• Alex Kampf• Benjamin Kepchar
Agenda
1. Stakeholders2. Context3. Constraints4. Deliverables5. Alternative Energy6. Wastewater Treatment
Stakeholders
•Purdue University• Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore • Judy Collins, Historical Architect • Joy Marburger, Research Coordinator •Mike Bremer, Chief Ranger• Stephanie Purcell, Administrative Assistant• Liz McConnell, Administrative Officer
• Future Residents • EEE and EAPS
Context
1. Background
2. Charles P. Nelson Home
3. Partnership with IDNL and NPS
Background
Background
• IDNL established in 1966• 15,000 acres• 2 million visitors/year• “preserve for the educational, inspirational, and recreational use of
the public”• Ecosystem restoration of the built environment• 750 homes originally• Reservation-of-use permission• Majority to be removed/destroyed
Charles Nelson Home
• Mutual interest
• Historic building
• Requires research permit
• Uninhabited
• Non-functional windmill on site
Partnership
•Onsite Interviews of stakeholders and park personnel
•Collaboration with local groups• To be established
• Special Event invitations• SCI-Great Lakes Workshop on Civic Engagement
Opportunities in Vacant Land Repurposing
Constraints• Use • Research resident dormitories
• Historical site• Comply with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the
Treatment of Historic Properties • Deliverable due date• Condition of home and property• Budget • Spatial • Short term research
Deliverables
1. Special Use Permit2. Rehabilitation Plan3. Senior Design Proposals
Special Use Permit
• Submitted
•Allows access to restricted area
• Interview Stakeholders on site
• Take measurements
Rehabilitation Plan• Persuasive• Building Use Proposal
• Dorms• Proposed Preservation and Rehabilitation Plan
• History• LEED
• Proposed Environmental Plan• Energy• Waste
• Financial Plan• Statement of Management Qualifications
• Economic and Expertise• Partnership Agreement
• Proposed Lease Terms and Conditions
Rehabilitation Plan
•Alternative Energy
•Wastewater Treatment
Senior Design Proposals
• Energy•Windmill
• Solar Panels
• Efficiency
•Water•Waste
Alternative Energy
• Use 36 font for this text
Wastewater Treatment
1. Constraints
2. Wastewater Treatment Systems
3. Ideal Secondary Treatment
4. Secondary Treatment Options
5. Treatment Economics & Maintenance
Constraints
• Economics
•Maintenance
• Environmental Costs
Wastewater Treatment Systems
• Integrated Septic Systems• Primary Treatment in Septic Tank
• Low maintenance
• Provides 70% of treatment
• Conventional Secondary Treatment
• Absorption fields
• Dispersion fields
Ideal Secondary Treatment
• Environmental Friendly• Low Cost of Operation•Minimal Maintenance •Pollution Control
Secondary Treatment Options
Absorption/ Dispersion fields• No pollution control for
organics, nutrients, or bacteria• Clogging Problems
Constructed Wetlands• Native or Adaptive Vegetation
Filters Pollutants• Naturally filters organics,
nutrients, and bacteria
Treatment Economics & Maintenance
• Septic Tank• High Construction Costs• Low Maintenance
• Constructed Wetlands• Construction Costs are 50-90% less then Conventional Systems• Regular Inspections & Care of Vegetation
Works Cited
• Environmental Building news. Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater. Retrieved from http://www.buildinggreen.com/auth/article.cfm/2009/7/30/Constructed-Wetlands/• Purdue Residential Onsite Wastewater Disposal. Purdue Engineering.
Retrieved from: https://engineering.purdue.edu/~frankenb/NU-prowd/