infowars the magazine - vol. 2 issue 2 - october 2013

8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013

1/35


2/35

2 3


3/35

4

5

Table ofContents

Globalists Openly

Embrace al-Qaeda

ADAN SALAZAR

9

14

36 42

Halloween is quickly approaching,but fear not! This year you haveno excuse to let the Washingtonwolves be the only ones in costume.Cut out either side of this uniqueHalloween special double cover,attach string or a rubber band to thesides, and frighten the sheeple withthe masks of some of Washingtonsworst horrors: the Obamacare

Skull or Prozac the Killer Clown!Send pictures of your adventures [email protected].

Quotes of the Month

Navy Yard Shooter Wason Mass Murder SuicidePills

written by:

Paul Joseph Watson

DoD Training Manual:Extremist Founding FathersWould Not Be Welcomed inTodays Military

written by:

Adan Salazar

Media Protection,Media Control: TheDeath of the FreePress

written by:

Kit Daniels

Middle of the Roadin Healthcare Leadsto Socialism

RON PAUL 18

Wife of ManExecuted by FBIDemands Justice

KURT NIMMO 20

Mental Illness andthe Ongoing Anti-Second AmendmentAgenda

KURT NIMMO 22

Leader of SyrianRebel Group CallsFor Attacks InsideU.S.

PAUL JOSEPH WATSON 26

Former NSA

Director AdvocatesChinese-StyleInternet

PAUL JOSEPH WATSON 27

The Need for Arms

KIT DANIELS 28

Do Vaccines CauseAutism?

MIKE ADAMS 31

The SecondAmendment OnlyApplies to al-Qaeda

KIT DANIELS 38

Apple iPhone 5S:Big Brothers DreamCome True

ANTHONY GUCCIARDI 45

Matt Drudge andAlex Jones:17-Year Old Bloggers

KURT NIMMO 47

Fox NewsDemonizes SecondAmendment Activist

JULIE WILSON 49

Rothschild BallExposes ElitesFascination WithOccult

ADAN SALAZAR

51

34 Percent of

Americans Say FirstAmendment TooExtreme

KIT DANIELS 55

DomesticPropaganda Is NowNormal

ADAN SALAZAR 62

Al-Qaeda RebelsProduced Sarin Gas

KIT DANIELS 65

Mass Murder PillsStrike Again

JULIE WILSON 57

Everybody favours free speech inthe slack moments when no axes arebeing ground.

Heywood Broun

It is a paradox that every dictatorhas climbed to power on the ladder offree speech. Immediately on attainingpower each dictator has suppressed allfree speech except his own.

Herbert Hoover

Free speech means the right to yelltheatre in a crowded fire.

Abbie Hoffman

After a shooting spree, they alwayswant to take the guns away from thepeople who didnt do it. I sure as hellwouldnt want to live in a society wherethe only people allowed guns are thepolice and the military.

William S. Burroughs

ON THE COVER


4/35

6 7

Infowars Sites

www.infowars.comHome of the #1 Internet news show in the world.

www.prisonplanet.comReporters on the scene, articles, andspecial coverage.

www.prisonplanet.tvGet access to all the channels: The Alex JonesShow, Nightly News, Exclusive Video Reports, 60+Movies and Documentaries, Books, and more.

www.planetinfowars.comInstantly connect to whats most important to you.Follow your friends, experts, favorite celebrities,and breaking news.

www.infowarsshop.comCheck out Infowars gear, exclusive Alex JonesMovies, Infowars Magazine, health and well-ness, preparedness products, and more.

Social Sites:Facebook.com/AlexanderEmerickJonesTwitter: @RealAlexJonesYoutube.com/TheAlexJonesChannel

Publisher

Managing Editor

Art Director

Alex Jones

John McEntire

Molly Rogers

Graphics &

Photography

Molly Rogers

Rob Reeger

Carter Watkins

Contributing

Writers

Paul J. Watson

Julie Wilson

Kurt Nimmo

Kit Daniels

Tim Fruge

Kelen McBreen

Matt Winegardner

Sales &

Advertising

Project

Manager

Editorial Assistants

Will Jones

Henry Dillard

Ricky Sullivan

War and Peaceby Erik D.W., a 10th grader in Texas

The world is turning around me, just asI am standing still.

Twisting and turning neverending, spinning.

Just as I am mirthful, people havehappiness in their hearts.

But oh! Such misery as the blood isshed across the Earth.

People crying, screaming, miserableand all this is caused by the evil spiritthat is war.

But peace, peace is the greatestspirit of all; it can conquer any land,nation, or country.

And can cause such happiness!

But Oh! Here comes the evil spirit thatis war and destruction!

The spirit is locked into us, callingfor the destruction of all.

Here peace comes; this is thegreatest battle of all.

Peace is the only thing that cansave our planet.

[email protected] [email protected] @infowarsmag infowarsmagazine

Do you realize you are the most

entertaining man in the world? Im serious.

And you know why? Simple. You tell the

truth. You tell the truth in a world of lies.

You tell the truth to people who have heard

nothing but lies all our lives. Now, when

everybody knows the truth and tells the

truth, I guess youll be boring, like the rest

of us. Keep doing what you are doing Alex.

Maurice M.

LETTERS P.O. Box 19549 Austin, TX [email protected] Send Us YourThoughts,Comments &

Artwork

Adan Salazar

Anthony Gucciardi

Ron Paul

Mike Adams

Just sent you the pic ofthe Infowars Magazinemicrodistribution push.

Common sense poppingup everywhere!

Norman S.

Sent from my NSA two-wayrecording matrix CIA ObamaPhone!

Charles A.

Philadelphia, last night of theconcert Trent Reznor Nine Inch Nails

sent by @NostraDomo Thanks greatmag.

Genaro

SUBSCRIPTIONSand bulk orders are available online at www.infowarsstore.com or through customer service a t 1-888-253-3139 ADVERTISINGinquiriescan be directed to 512-646-4414 or [email protected] INFORMATIONrequests, whether general or editorial, can be found by contacting [email protected] Infowars Magazineis published by Free Speech Systems, LLC. 12 times a year with a circulation of 100,000 copies. All content within thismagazine is copyright of Free Speech Systems, LLC. To receive a free electronic version of the magazine, become an Infowars Insider by signing up at www.

infowars.com/newletter PERMISSIONto reprint original Infowars articles in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given. Some articlesare copyrighted by our contributing writers, so check to see if copyright-free status applies. The articles appearing within this publication reflect the opinions andattitudes of their respective authors and not necessarily those of the publisher, advertisers, or editorial team.


5/35

8 9

written by:

Paul Joseph Watson

Navy Yard Shooter Was onMass Murder Suicide PillsDrug Linked to Previous Mass Shooting Despite

Washington PostDeclaring It Safe

It has been confirmed that Navy Yard gunman Aaron

Alexis was on the anti-depressant drug Trazodone,

providing yet another example of a connection

between psychiatric drugs and mass shootings.

In verifying that Alexis was prescribed Trazodone

by the Veterans Affairs Office, The Washington Post

published a brief article downplaying the danger of the

drug, quoting Miami physician Gabriela Cora who stated

(almost too eagerly), Honestly, its a very safe drug to

use. However, the drug has been linked to a number of

murders, including one mass shooting.

Trazodone is sold under the brand names Desyrel,

Oleptro, Beneficat, Deprax, Desirel, Molipaxin, Thombran,

Trazorel, Trialodine, Trittico, and Mesyrel. Although

not strictly a member of the SSRI antidepressants, itshares many of the same properties and also serves to

increase the amount of serotonin in the brain. Despite The

Washington Posts attempts to portray the drug as being

safe, it is linked with a whole host of side-effects including

suicidal tendencies, panic attacks, depersonalization,

and anger. Symptoms of Trazodone withdrawal include

aggression and violent behavior.

The drug also carries an, FDA black box warning

for suicide, and is documented to cause mania and

violent behavior, writes Kelly Patricia OMeara. Several

murder cases over the past few years have been directly

connected to Trazodone.

1)Eight people were killed and one wounded during a

mass shooting at a beauty parlor in Seal Beach, California

in 2011. The killer, Scott Evan Dekraai, was on Desyrel, a

commercial variant of Trazodone.

2)In 2009, Perley Goodrich Jr. beat his mother andthen shot his father dead shortly after being injected

with Trazodone in a psychiatric hospital. Goodrich had

complained that he didnt want to take the medication

because it made him feel violent.

3)In 2009, Steven Foster shot a gas station attendant

in the head before shooting him a second time. Bottles

of Trazodone pills were later found in Fosters room.

4)Marine Lance Cpl. Delano Holmes fatally stabbed

an Iraqi soldier to death in 2007 after military doctors

prescribed him Trazodone.

5)Indiana soldier Pfc. David Lawrence was taking

Trazodone in combination with Zoloft when he

killed a Taliban commander in a prison cell in

2010. Lawrence was charged with premeditatedmurder. According to the FDA, taking these drugs

in combination can cause altered consciousness,

confusion, hallucinations, and coma.

This is interesting given that Aaron Alexis had also

suffered from PTSD, blackouts, and anger issues years

before he began receiving treatment from the VA.

We now know that Alexis had been treated since

August by the Veterans Administration for his mental

problems. As Mike Adams points out, This is proof

that Aaron Alexis was on psychiatric drugs, because

thats the only treatment currently being offered by the

Veterans Administration for mental problems. Alexis

family members also confirmed to the press that he

was being treated for his mental health problems.

Across the medical industry, treatment is the code

word for psychiatric drugging. Could he have been on

more than just one anti-depressant drug at the time of

the rampage? The most common form of treatment forPTSD is Paroxetine, which is listed as the number three

top violence-causing drug by the Institute for Safe


6/35

10 11

Medication Practices (ISMP).

Regardless of the fact that the Navy Yard

shooter Aaron Alexis was taking a drug from

a class of psychotropics that have been linked

to dozens of previous mass shootings, the

mainstream media has once again avoided all

discussion of the issue, preferring instead to

blame the tragedy on a non-existent AR-15

that the gunman didnt even use.

Prescription drugs were found in the

apartment of Batman shooter James Holmes

days after the Aurora massacre, but it took nine

months to find out exactly what those drugs

were. Like Columbine killer Eric Harris, Holmes

had been taking Zoloft, another SSRI drug

linked with violent outbursts. The length of time

it took to find out that Holmes was on Zoloft

was partly because the media habitually shows

zero interest in pursuing the link between anti-

depressants and violence. As the website SSRI

Stories profusely documents, there are literally

hundreds of examples of mass shootings,

murders, and other violent episodes that have

been committed by individuals on psychiatric

drugs over the past three decades. The number

of cases is staggering.

Why is the corporate media so disinterested

in pursuing this clear connection? Perhaps

it has something to do with the fact that the

pharmaceutical giants who produce drugs like

Zoloft, Prozac, and Paxil spend around $2.4

billion dollars a year on direct-to-consumer

television advertising every year. By running

negative stories about prescription drugs,

networks risk losing tens of millions of dollars

in ad revenue.

While failing to ask questions about what

SSRI drugs Aaron Alexis was taking prior to

his rampage, the media instead blamed the

shooting on assault rifles, even after it had

been confirmed that no AR-15 was used by

Alexis during the massacre. FBI assistant

director Victoria Parlave stated at a press

conference on September 17 that authorities,

do not have any information at this time that

[Alexis] had an AR-15 in his possession.

Despite there being no evidence that an AR-

15 was used, The New York Daily News ran a

front page headline the morning of September

17 claiming, Same Gun Different Slay, next

to a picture of an assault rifle. Hours after

the FBI stated that no AR-15 had been used,

MSNBCs Alex Wagner, who previously blamed

the Boston bombings on Alex Jones, continued

to use an animated graphic depicting Alexis

carrying an assault rifle during the massacre.

Anti-Second Amendment crusader Piers

Morgan also erroneously blamed the shooting

on a man with a legally purchased AR-15,

who just committed the same kind of atrocity

as we saw at Sandy Hook and Aurora,

during his CNN show on Monday. CNNs live

news coverage also reported that Alexis had

recently purchased (an) AR-15 shotgun,

when in fact that purchase had been denied.

Both The New York Timesand The Washington

Postalso falsely reported that an AR-15 had

been found on Alexis after the massacre. D.C.

gun grabbers Dianne Feinstein and Dick Durbin

also regurgitated the false claim that Alexis

used an AR-15 during the rampage.

The U.S. press has once again behaved like

state media in the aftermath of the Navy Yard

shooting by pursuing the assault rifle angle

despite the fact that it was patently false in

order to bolster the White Houses gun control

agenda. In doing so, they have concurrently

buried an integral aspect of mass shootings

that needs to be highlighted as part of a

national conversation the clear connection

between violent outbursts and SSRI drugs.


7/35

12 13

or call 1.888.253.3139

PURCHASE AT INFOWARSSTORE.COM

OR CALL 1.888. 253. 3139


8/35

14 15

written by:Adan Salazar

When Infowars made the

claim months ago that the

governments ties to al-Qaeda

effectively meant Obama had

assumed the role of global head

of al-Qaeda, we were predictably demonized for

calling our beloved leader out on his administrations

murderous relationship with what we have been led

to believe are some of the most notorious criminals

on the planet. After all, it was al-Qaeda, we were told,

who committed the heinous acts of 9/11.

Although our damning report provided profuse

documentation supporting the fact the Obama

administration has directly been funneling aid and

training, along with millions of dollars, to al-Qaeda-

dominated Syrian opposition forces, mainstream

media pundits, led by the likes of MSNBCs Rachel

Maddow, still attempted to discredit Jones using straw

man and ad hominemtactics, as well as formulating

and attributing patently unsubstantiated accusations.

Maddow lumped our heavily documented claim

that Americas dear leader was in bed with al-Qaeda

with less popular conspiracies, many of whose official

stories have also been thoroughly debunked. He

also thinks the evidence is overwhelming that the

government staged the Oklahoma City bombing

[and] that the government staged the space shuttle

disaster, Maddow said in April. He also says the

evidence is overwhelming that President Obama is

now personally the global head of al-Qaeda. See,

folks, the evidence is just overwhelming. Do I have

to spell it out for you? Are you blind? Maddow

asked, feigning incredulity and ignoring the deluge of

supporting evidence provided in our article.

Fervent Infowars readers likely need no further

evidence America has been the primary mover

behind al-Qaeda forces in Syria. For years, we

have documented how the CIA and other foreign

governments have purposely installed different

factions of the terror group (read as: mercenaries)

around the world to destabilize key regions. Here is

just a smattering of recent articles further supporting

the fact Obama is working with the very p eople we

were told to fear in the days after 9/11.

Ignoring the Headlines

In order to remain blithely oblivious to the multiple

confirmations proving our claims accurate, its necessary

to ignore contradictory headlines. Here are a few:

In a recent article by the UKs London Independent,

writer Robert Fisk asked Does Obama Know Hes

Fighting on al-Qaedas Side? Fisk writes, If Barack

Obama decides to attack the Syrian regime, he has

ensured for the very first time in history that the

United States will be on the same side as al-Qaida.

In a USA Todaystory titled, Syrian Rebels Pledge

Loyalty to al-Qaeda, writer Mona Alami also claimed,

A Syrian rebel groups April pledge of allegiance to

al-Qaedas replacement for Osama bin L aden suggests

that the terrorist groups influence is not waning and

that it may take a greater role in the Western-backed

fight to topple Syrian President Bashar Assad.

Another story out of theLondon Guardian, entitled,

Al-Qaida Turns Tide for Rebels in Battle for Eastern

Syria, fleshed out that Free Syrian Army fighters met

almost every day with al-Qaeda leadership, the same

rebel forces weve been pledging millions of dollars to.

In yet another story indicating the Free Syrian Army

was increasingly being overtaken by anti-American

al-Qaeda loyalism, the BBC interestingly published

an article titled, Syria Crisis: Al-Nusra Pledges

Allegiance to al-Qaeda, which claims. The leader of

the al-Nusra Front, a jihadist group fighting in Syria,

More than a Decade After9/11, Globalists OpenlyEmbrace al-QaedaIn Case You Didnt Get the Memo, al-Qaeda, the Group

Supposedly Responsible for 9/11, Is Now Our Ally in Syria


9/35

16 17

Its true thatsome of Assadsopponents areextremists,Obama admitted.

has pledged allegiance to the leader of al-

Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahiri Abu Mohammed

al-Jawlani said the groups behaviour in Syria

would not change as a result.

And in a report from February by the

London Telegraph, titled, Syria: How Jihadist

Group Jabhat al-Nusra is Taking Over Syrias

Revolution, Ruth Sherlock wrote, For many

Syrians, Nusra is synonymous with al-Qaeda.

Many of their fighters are foreign jihadists;

some fought with al-Qaeda in Iraq.

Last December, the Gray Lady of

establishment propaganda, The New York

Times, was also forced to report Syrian Rebels

Tied to Al Qaeda Play Key Role in War.

Ignoring Pundits, Lawmakersand Leaders

Several prominent political pundits and

national leaders have also begun attempting

to wake the American people up to Obamas

al-Qaeda support efforts. When the Senate

Foreign Relations Committee voted early

September to authorize strikes on Syria,

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul highlighted the

absurdity of aiding known terrorists when he

stated, This is an important moment You

will be funding, today, the allies of al-Qaeda.

Its an irony you cannot overcome.

Conservative pundit Pat Buchanan was

also one of the first prominent political

commentators to reveal he believed the Syrian

gas attack may have been a staged provocation.

We have also seen Senators Ted Cruz and

Dennis Kucinich state that if Obama authorized

air strikes on Syria, then our military would in

effect become al-Qaedas air force.

Also at the end of August, former

Congressman Ron Paul claimed he believed

Syrias disputed August 21 chemical weapons

attack could have been a false flag attack,

and asked Fox News host Neil Cavuto, Why

dont we ask about the al-Qaeda? Why are we

on the side of the al-Qaeda right now? Afghan

President Hamid Karzai has also made clear that

the Obama administration is now colluding with

the Taliban while the group carries out suicide

bombings in the service of America.

Obama Admits He Wantsto Aid al-Qaeda

In Obamas September 10 speech, he

confessed to the nation that the opposition

forces he so badly wanted to support in Syria

were increasingly al-Qaeda extremists. Its

true that some of Assads opponents are

extremists, Obama admitted. But al-Qaeda

will only draw strength in a more chaotic

Syria if people there see the world doing

nothing to prevent innocent civilians from

being gassed to death.

George Orwells1984perfectly depicted

the problem of a nation surrendering control

of its media to the government. In his

startlingly accurate vision, whole nations

were convinced they had never been at war,

or they were always at war, simply through

media manipulation. Of course, Orwell

never anticipated the immense technological

advances that would one day emerge to aid

those who have realized the absurdity of

embracing the very terror groups we were

supposed to be fighting.

Even former U.S. National Security Adviser

and Trilateral Commission co-founder

Zbigniew Brzezinski has recently had to admit

that instant mass communications such

as radio, television, and the Internet was

derailing efforts to create a new world order,

and that a global political awakening was

responsible for unhinging plans for a Syrian

intervention. Its important to realize that its

the medias job to feed us war propaganda.

Through war, the globalists believe, they can

derive order from chaos.

However, with the Defense Departments

recent admissions they would have to beef

up their public affairs efforts due to the

American people no longer placing faith in

their credibility, and with Obama backing off

of a potential Syria strike (for the time being),

its evident humanity is at a turning point

where alternative and independent media is

beginning to have an impact being felt at the

highest levels of government.


10/35

18 19

written by:

Ron Paul

Contrary to theclaims of someof its opponents,Obamacare isnot socializedmedicine. It iscorporatizedmedicine.T

he ever-expanding role of government in healthcare

provides an excellent example of Ludwig Von Mises

warning that the middle of the road leads to Socialism.

Beginning in the 1940s, government policies

distorted the healthcare market, causing prices to

rise and denying many Americans access to quality care. Congress

reacted to the problems caused by their prior interventions

with new interventions, such as the HMO Act, ERISA, EMTLA,

and various federal entitlement programs. Each new federal

intervention not only failed to fix the problems it was supposedly

created to solve, it created new p roblems, leading to calls for even

more new federal interventions. This process culminated in 2010,

when Congress passed Obamacare.

Contrary to the claims of some of its opponents, Obamacare is

not socialized medicine; it is corporatized medicine. After all, the

central feature of Obamacare is the mandate that all Americans buy

health insurance from private health insurance companies. And,

as with previous government interventions in the marketplace,

Obamacare is not only failing to correct the problems caused by

prior federal laws, it is creating new problems.

Consider the almost weekly stories about how Obamacare is

causing health insurance premiums to rise, causing employees

to lay off workers or reduce their workers hours, and causing

doctors to leave the p rofession. Also, consider the problems

the administration is already having administering the federal

exchanges and other parts of the healthcare law.

I fully expect the implosion of Obamacare to continue, and the

supporters of nationalized healthcare to use Obamacares failures

to push for a Canadian-style single payer healthcare system.

Unfortunately, some Obamacare opponents fail to see that the

problem is not just Obamacare, but all government interference

with healthcare. These Obamacare opponents advocate replacing

Obamacare with Obamacare lite, but economic law teaches us

that Obamacare lite will be no more successful than Obamacare.

In order to win the battle for health freedom, those who oppose

nationalized healthcare must have the courage to advocate for

a complete free market in healthcare. Enhanced individual tax

credits and enhanced use of Health Savings Accounts (HSA) are

just two polices that could help restore a free-market in health

care by putting control over the healthcare dollar back in the

hands of the people. A good place to start would be to repeal

Obamacares restrictions on HSAs.

Long-term group insurance contracts could

ensure that those with pre-existing conditions

could obtain coverage. Under such a contract,

individuals could pool resources to purchase

a group policy that would cover any and

all problems any member might develop

over time. Businesses, churches, community

organizations, and even fraternities and

sororities could offer these types of contracts.

Negative outcomes insurance, where

patients waive the right to sue for medical

errors in exchange for guaranteed payouts

to those harmed, could reduce the burden

of malpractice litigation. Other free-market

healthcare reforms that could make the

healthcare market more competitive and

lower the cost of healthcare include allowing

individuals to purchase insurance from across

state lines, removing restrictions on physician-

owned hospitals, and reducing the regulatory

power of the Food and Drug Administration.

Some will say it is unrealistic to advocate

replacing Obamacare with a pure free-market

system, but in fact it is unrealistic to expect

anything less than a true free-market to

provide quality healthcare for Americans at

all income levels. Continuing on the middle

of the road in healthcare by mixing free-

markets with government spending and

regulations will only continue to take us on

the road to socialized health care.

Former Congressman Ron Pauls article first

appeared at the-free-foundation.org, the

temporary home for his weekly column until his

personal web page is up and running.

And, as with previousgovernment interventionsin the marketplace,Obamacare is not onlyfailing to correct theproblems caused by priorfederal laws, it is creating

new problems.

Middle of the Road in HealthcareLeads to Socialism


11/35

20 21

The widow of Ibragim Todashev, Reni Todashev, told

Alex Jones on September 12 that the FBI and the U.S.

government have stonewalled attempts to find out what

happened to her husband on May 22 of this year. We

really dont have official papers of what happened,

she told Alex Jones, so there is not much we can do before our

investigation. Ibragim, an acquaintance of deceased Boston

bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev, was killed by the FBI in

Orlando, Florida, allegedly during an interrogation session related

to the Boston bombing.

Following his death, Abdulbaki Todashev, the executed mans father,

said during a news conference in Russia that his son was killed by the

FBI to keep him from talking. I want justice. I want an investigation,

he said. They come to your house like bandits, and they shoot you.

Maybe my son knew some sort of information that the police didnt

want to get out, he added. They shut him up. Thats my opinion.

The elder Todashev arrived in the United States in August determined

to investigate his sons murder. Todashev speaks little English, cannot

afford a lawyer, and has nothing more than a tourist visa to the United

States, but the ACLU has vowed to help him, according to Russia Today.

Todashev said he plans to sue the FBI for his sons death.

Prior to Todashevs arrival in the U.S., an Islamic rights group, the

Council on American-Islamic Relations, filed a formal complaint with

the Department of Justice. The organization called for an independent,

thorough, and transparent investigation into the circumstances

surrounding Ibragims death. In July, Infowars.com reported that the FBI

had barred a Florida medical examiner from publicly releasing autopsy

information that would have shed light on the death of the 27-year-old.

Reni Todashev admitted receiving justice for her husbands murder

at the hands of the FBI will be difficult, but vowed to press the case

in the United States. She said there is a prosecutor in Florida who

wants to investigate the case. Alex said he believes Todashev was

executed.They interviewed him for eight hours in the living room of

his Orlando apartment, Jones said during the September 12 interview

with Reni Todashev. Let me tell you what this is I know the

standard procedure. You know w hat eight hours means, right? They

got the info they wanted, and they executed him.

Wife of ManExecuted by FBIDemands JusticeIbragim Todashev Executed After EightHours of FBI Interrogation FollowingBoston Bombing

written by:

Kurt Nimmo

Photo Caption: Pictured here with his wife Reni, Ibragim Todashev was killed during FBI interrogation.

Reni Todashev admitted receiving justicefor her husbands murder at the hands ofthe FBI will be difficult, but vowed to pressthe case in the United States.

Following Ibragimsdeath, AbdulbakiTodashev, theexecuted mansfather, said duringa news conferencein Russia that his

son was killed bythe FBI to keep himfrom talking. I wantjustice. I want aninvestigation, he

said. They cometo your house likebandits, and they

shoot you.


12/35

scheduled a June meeting co ered in dog to this kind of eapon a reference to the symbolic actions in August He signed an


13/35

24 25

If mass shooter incidents continueto occur and especially if theybecome more violent and claimlarger numbers of victims the willof Congress will ultimately bend,if only imperceptibly at first, in the

direction of ultimate disarmament.

scheduled a June meeting covered in dog

and pony fashion to address the issue.

Obamas Telemundo remarks were an

attempt to reinvigorate flawed legislation that

unceremoniously crashed and burned after

Newtown. In March, the Senates neocon

frontman, Lindsay Graham, tried to lead an

uphill battle to get legislation enacted that

would have imposed background checks on

folks deemed mentally ill by the state. The

NICS Reporting Improvement Act of 2013

would have also paved over claimed gaps in

a standing law applicable to those who would

lose their right to buy and carry guns based

on a diagnosis of mental illness, including

those involuntarily committed to a psychiatric

hospital. Despite support by both Democrats

and Republicans, the legislation was defeated

and the Bill of Rights spared another

humiliating mauling, at least temporarily.

Undeterred, Graham added the provisions

to a later Republican-backed gun bill that was

also defeated in the Senate. Following the

Navy Yard shooting, a Democrat from Hawaii,

Senator Brian Schatz, said now is the time

to do the right thing and revisit legislation.

While legislation cant put an end to all

violence, lawmakers must do what is right and

close the gaping holes in our system in order

to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and

the severely mentally ill, he said.

In March, Senator Feinstein opposed

language proposed during a meeting of the

Senate Judiciary that would have protected

veterans from government attempts to

render their Second Amendment right to

own firearms inoperative. Feinstein told her

colleagues she was determined to find a way

that veterans who are incapacitated for one

reason or another mentally dont have access

to this kind of weapon, a reference to the

dreaded AR-15 and related semiautomatic

weapons demonized by the government and

the establishment media. Feinsteins remarks

stoked fears earlier expressed after the

Department of Homeland Security under

both Democrat and Republican presidents

declared returning veterans to be a threat

along with patriot groups and other assorted

anti-government groups and individuals.

Mental illness is at the core of the Obama

administrations antigun agenda and its

implementation may not ultimately require

the passage of laws by Congress. Firearm

regulation is slowly and quietly being turned

over to the mental health professionals,

Clinical Psychologist Dr. Dathan Paterno told

World Net Daily in September. Congress

doesnt have to pass more laws to restrict

gun ownership. The laws are already on

the books. If more people can be classified

as mentally unstable and unable to own a

firearm, fewer people will be able to legally

own guns. This can be done without the

passage of a single law. Dont be fooled by

a lack of bills being sent through Congress,

Paterno continued. Dianne Feinstein will

be successful in restricting gun ownership

whether she passes legislation or not.

Obamas executive orders paired with the new

psychiatric guidelines are all that is needed to

take firearms from the hands of Americans.

In January, Obama released nearly two

dozen executive orders controlling firearms,

including one allowing doctors to ask

patients about guns in their homes. Order

16 specifically clarifies that no federal law

prevents health care providers from warning

law enforcement authorities about threats

of violence. Obama rolled out other largely

symbolic actions in August. He signed an

executive action a regulation that does

not require legislative action by Congress

outlawing antiquated World War II military-

grade weapons the United States sells or

donates to allies from being brought back into

the states by private entities.

The government argued that 250,000 of

these weapons have found their way back

into the United States and a number of them

have ended up on the street, although it is

unlikely we will see outmoded M1 Garand

carbines in the hands of drug gang enforcers.

Banning these rifles because of their use

in quote-unquote crimes is like banning

Model Ts because so many of them are being

used as getaway cars in bank robberies,California resident Ed Woods told the

Associated Press on August 29. Despite the

absurdity of this executive action and others,

the Obama administration is establishing

a precedent for future action, especially

with congressional elections looming on

the horizon and the prospect new anti-

Second Amendment legislation will remain

a nonstarter in the short term.

The global elite, however, deals with long

term projections. If mass shooter incidents

continue to occur and especially if they

become more violent and claim larger

numbers of victims the will of Congress

will ultimately bend, if only imperceptibly at

first, in the direction of ultimate disarmament.

Unfortunately, the National Rifle Association

has facilitated this slow drift toward ultimate

disarmament. For instance, the NRA

worke d with Congress in 1998 to imp ose

an instant computerized background

check on sales that were previously legal

under the Second Amendment.

written by:


14/35

2726

Former NSADirector AdvocatesChinese-StyleInternet

During a speech at St. Johns Episcopal Church on

September 15, former NSA and CIA director Michael

Hayden advocated a move towards a Chinese-style

world wide web where users are forced to identify

themselves before posting online content. Comparing

the Internet to the wild west and Somalia, Hayden

indicated that he would like to see the United States

adopt a system of web policing similar to that used in Communist China,

where users are mandated to submit to real name registration before they

can use services like Weibo, the Chinese version of Twitter. The problem I

have with the Internet is that its anonymous, remarked Hayden.

Although the implementation of the real name registration system in

China has been fraught with technical difficulties, its ultimate intention is

to prevent social network users f rom spreading rumors about the ruling

Communist Party, or in other words, its all about crushing dissent against

the state. Prominent micro-bloggers who attracted millions of followers as

a result of criticizing the Chinese government are now being arrested and

forced to confess their crimes as part of a return to a Mao-era style ofjustice, one that Michael Hayden apparently thinks America should adopt

by following Chinas example of banning Internet anonymity.

While defending mass NSA spying on the American public via the recently

revealed PRISM program, Hayden also claimed that Gmail was the email

service of choice for terrorists. Gmail is the preferred Internet service

provider of terrorists worldwide, he stated, presumably unaware thatGmail is merely an email service and not an ISP, adding, I dont think

youre going to see that in a Google commercial, but its free, its ubiquitous,

so of course it is.

In reality, as a Bloomberg News report highlighted, the [NSA]surveillance systems are best suited for gathering information on law-

abiding citizens, and not actual terrorists, who are extremely unlikely to

use Gmail, Skype, or iCloud. This is by no means the first time that Michael

Hayden has uttered statements about the Internet rich with controversyyet poor on facts. Last month, Hayden compared hackers, cyberactivists,

and transparency groups to al-Qaeda terrorists, labeling them, nihilists,

anarchists, activists, Lulzsec, Anonymous, twentysomethings who havent

talked to the opposite sex in five or six years.

Leader of Syrian RebelGroup Calls for AttacksInside U.S.Who Also Just Happens to Be the Headof al-Qaeda

Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri urged small-

scale attacks inside the United States to bleed America

economically, adding he hoped eventually to see a more

significant strike, reports Reuters. We should bleed America

economically by provoking it to continue in its massive

expenditure on its security, for the weak point of America is

its economy, which has already begun to stagger due to the

military and security expenditure, al-Zawahri said.

As the Bipartisan Policy Center highlighted in a report

released mid-September, al-Zawahri took control of Jabhat

al-Nusra when he personally intervened to settle a dispute

between Jabhat al-Nusra and al-Qaeda in Iraq and

declared the Syrian group to be under his direction. Jabhat

al-Nusra, which according to reports is essential to the

frontline operations of the rebels fighting to topple Assad

and conducts the heaviest frontline fighting in Syria,

publicly pledged allegiance to al-Qaeda earlier this year.

Since then al-Qaeda, which had previously been on life

support according to expert Peter Bergen, is now undergoing

a process of revival and resuscitation by establishing a new

foothold in Syria through Jabhat al-Nusra.

Given that al-Qaeda head al-Zawahri is now the spiritual

leader of the primary Syrian opposition group, its

unsurprising that opposition militants sing the praises of

his predecessor Osama bin Laden while glorifying the 9/11attacks. What should be shocking to Americans is the fact

that the Central Intelligence Agency is sending weapons to

rebels who have pledged allegiance to Jabhat al-Nusra and

are defecting in droves. This is a group responsible for killing

U.S. troops in Iraq.

Essentially, the CIA is arming a terrorist group which is

directed by the head of al-Qaeda, who is simultaneously

calling for terror attacks inside the United States and

its all being conducted in plain view. Americans are

seeing their tax dollars used to equip terrorists who are

an integral part of the same ideology which led to the

slaughter of 3,000 Americans in New York, Pennsylvania,

and Washington 12 years ago. Only through greater

understanding of this fact will opposition to the Obama

administrations intervention on the side of the rebels

be maintained and a deadly conflict that could lead to a

regional war be averted.

written by:

Paul Joseph Watson

written by: Paul Joseph Watson

Ayman al-Zawahri, the leader of Jabhat al-Nusra, which is the primary oppositionfighting force in Syria, has called for terrorattacks inside the United States. Al-Zawahri

just happens to be the leader of another group youmight have heard of: al-Qaeda.

written by: Kit Daniels

T th t


15/35

28 29

It is a common mistake to consider a

firearm as a symbol of aggression

a sword instead of a shield but afirearm is a shield in the hands of the

peaceful public, because it will remind

an aggressor that he will pay the ultimate

price for violence against the innocent:

forfeiture of his life. The cost to him is

too great; aggression is priced too high to

pursue. It is less expensive for potential

criminals to produce rather than to take, to

build rather than to steal. Society grows and

prospers as a result.

When the people arm themselves for

protection, violence will always be more

costly than meaningful production. But

when a government, however, removes

the right to self-defense, politicians are

granting criminals a subsidy by disarming

the victims, thereby making it less costly for

them to rob, beat, rape, and kill. No longer

at its natural equilibrium, the lower cost ofviolence encourages aggression over peaceful

productivity. This is a disarmed society, living

in decadence and fear.

With the current American population atover 310 million, the federal government

will never value the individuals life as much

as he will his own. To the government, an

individual is one of millions, an insignificant

fraction. To the individual, however, his

life his very consciousness is one of

one and it is irreplaceable. The value of

an individuals life is best determined by

himself, not by the state.

Because of this, the individual is the best

defender of his own life, never the police

who have no responsibility to protect him,

according to numerous Supreme Court cases.

When in need of police services, the public

is served by a local police department with

no other options. The police operate as a

monopoly without any sort of competition

which would put them out of business if they

serve the community poorly. This is why theindividual, not the police, must have sole

responsibility for the protection of his own life.

In better understanding of the inalienable

right that makes such defense possible, itis vital for the public to understand the

Founders intent for the Second Amendment,

which is routinely misunderstood by those

unaware of the individual right to keep

and bear arms. During the founding of our

constitutional republic, a militia that was

well-regulated meant that the citizens who

comprised it were well-trained and well-

rehearsed. The word regulated referred

to the discipline practiced by those citizens,

which had absolutely nothing to do with

government involvement at all. A well-

regulated militia was effective at defending

the community without being authorized or

controlled by the state.

The Founding Fathers viewed the local

militias, who successfully resisted the

British Empire, as armed individuals who

spontaneously organized in defense oftheir homes, their families, and their own

The Need for Arms

An armed society is a polite society. Manners are goodwhen one may have to back up his acts with his life. Robert A. Heinlein, Beyond This Horizon

lives. A well-regulated militia cannot exist

without the individuals right to arm himself,

because a group cannot exist withoutindividuals. Without the individual right to

armed defense, we the people cannot resist

suppression by the state. Tyrants who do not

fear us can destroy our liberties, including

the ability to speak freely, to assemble, and to

protest against their tyranny.

Here are some stories that illustrate the

importance of the Second Amendment, which

merely recognizes a human right that existed

prior to the founding of our republic:

March 16, 1975

Two men, Marvin Kent and James Morse,

broke into a rooming house in Washington,

D.C. and raped Miriam Douglas. The two

women who lived in the room above, Carolyn

Warren and Joan Taliaferro, called police

twice, but officers never came to their aid.The two rapists finally discovered Warren and

Taliaferro above and forced all three women

to accompany them to Kents apartment,

where the women were raped for 14 hours

straight. The women later initiated Warren

v. District of Columbia, a lawsuit against the

city which alleged negligent failure to provide

police protection. In a 43 decision, the court

of appeals ruled against the women, stating

that the police were under no specific legal

duty to protect individuals.

October 16, 1991

George Hennard drove his pick-up truck

through the front window of a Luby s

Cafeteria in Killeen, Texas, and proceeded

to open fire on 50 people, killing 23. Former

Texas house member Suzanna Hupp survivedthe attack, but her parents did not. She later

y

regretted that she left her handgun outside in

her vehicle because she did not want to run

afoul of the concealed carry laws at the time.

May 27, 2010

Abraham Dickan, 79, showed up at an

AT&T store in New York Mills, New York, with

an employee kill list in one hand and a .357

magnum in the other. When Dickan fired the

first shot, off-duty police officer Donald J.

Moore drew his concealed firearm and killed

Dickan. Only one employee was injured.

March 25, 2012

Jesse Gates showed up at the Freewill

Baptist Church in Boiling Springs, South

Carolina, and aimed a shotgun at the

pastor while he preached. Aaron Guyton,

a CHL holder in the congregation, pulled

his gun on Gates while the pastor took theshotgun away from him. No shots were

fired and no one was injured.

August 28, 2012

Robert Barron allegedly stabbed Teresa

Barron multiple times after she dropped

off her child off outside of a school in San

Antonio, Texas. A CHL holder nearby pulled

out his handgun and ordered Barron to drop

the knife, which he did.

December 11, 2012

Jacob Roberts killed two people and

seriously wounded another at a shopping mall

in Clackamas County, Oregon. A shopper at

the mall, Nick Meli, pulled out his concealed

handgun on Roberts, who then retreated. Melinever fired a shot.

To the government,an individual isone of millions,an insignificantfraction. To theindividual, however,his life his veryconsciousness isone of one and itis irreplaceable.

The value of anindividuals life isbest determined byhimself, not by the

state.

written by:

Mike Adams


16/35

30 31

There is systematic suppression

in the United States on the truth

about the links between vaccines

and autism. Drug companies and

the federal government have

conspired to deny parents of vaccine-damaged

children their day in court by creating a

kangaroo vaccine court that offers no due

process whatsoever (and therefore violates

the civil liberties of Americans). Even so, this

court has, numerous times, admitted that

vaccines have irrefutably damaged children

and caused autism. Parents of those children

are offered hush money to quietly go awayafter signing an agreement that mandates

they never talk to the press about their ordeal.

This systematic suppression of the truth

about vaccine-damaged children is revealed

in a must-see new video just released by

the Canary Party (www.CanaryParty.org)

and narrated by actor Rob Schneider, an

outspoken advocate of parental rights when

it comes to medicine. The Canary Party is a

fast-growing movement of parents, doctors,

scientists, and everyday citizens who want

to put a stop to the systematic poisoning of

the population by drug companies, vaccine

manufacturers, and other corporate pushers

of toxic substances that damage humankind

(and the planet). The Canary Party seeks to

reveal the truth about how we are all being

poisoned by unethical corporations and then

find constructive ways to stop the poisoningand end the human suffering caused by it.

Why Do Vaccines Harm Children?

1) Mercury is still used in vaccines, and the

CDC openly admits it. There is no safe level

of mercury for injecting into a human child.

Not even trace levels. There is no evidence

of safety for mercury at any dose w hatsoever.

Any doctor who says the level of mercury in

a vaccine is safe to inject into a child is only

demonstrating their outrageous ignorance

of scientific facts. Mercury is arguably the

most neurotoxic element on the entire Table

of Elements. It is used in vaccines for the

convenience of the vaccine manufacturer atthe expense of the safety of the child. Any

doctor who injects mercury into a child at

any dose should be immediately stripped of

their medical license.

See the list of studies on the neurotoxicity

of mercury at science.naturalnews.com. Those

study titles include: Lactational exposure to

inorganic mercury: evidence of Neurotoxic

effects, Neurotoxic action of inorganic

Mercury injected in the intraventricular

space of mouse cerebrum, Neurotoxic

effects in workers of the clinical thermometer

manufacture plant, and Neurotoxic risk

caused by stable and variable exposure to

methylmercury from seafood.

There is no safe form of mercury as is often

ridiculously claimed by vaccine pushers. Both

ethyl and methyl mercury are extremely toxic

to the human nervous system. Neither shouldever, under any circumstances, be deliberately

Do VaccinesCause Autism?

Mike Adams

New Video Reveals the Systematic Suppression ofEvidence of Vaccine-Damaged Children


17/35


18/35

34 35


19/35

written by:

Kit Daniels Obama will act onhi t f


20/35

38 39

Obama: The SecondAmendment OnlyApplies to al-Qaeda

President Pushed to Disarm Americans on the

Same Day He Approved Arming al-Qaeda

President Barack Obama

accelerated firearm shipments

to al-Qaeda on the very same

day he demanded more gun

control in the wake of the

D.C. Navy Yard shooting. On September

16, Obama waived a provision in federal

law specifically designed to keep the U.S.

government from supplying firearms to

terrorists such as al-Qaeda, according to The

Washington Examiner. Citing his authority

under the Arms Export Control Act, the

president declared that he would waive

the prohibitions in sections 40 and 40A of

the AECA related to such a transaction. No

longer will Obama need to rely on the CIA to

give free guns to Islamic extremists in Syria;

now he will make the transfers openly withthis transparent government initiative.

On the same day as his overt approval for

arms to al-Qaeda, Obama announced that

he is drafting executive orders for more gun

control. We have gone about implementing

the executive actions that were part of the

presidents plan to take action to reduce gun

violence, White House Press Secretary Jay

Carney said after the Navy Yard shooting.

Obviously, he continues to support measures

taken by Congress that could be taken

by Congress to reduce gun violence in

a common-sense way, like improving our

background-check system.

In essence, Obama will act on his own to

force firearm restrictions onto the American

people, and if Congress would like to join him

later, they are welcome to do so. He already

has allies in Congress drooling to disarm

law-abiding citizens. When will enough be

enough? asked Diane Feinstein, a Democratic

Senator from California. Congress must

stop shirking its responsibility and resume

a thoughtful debate on gun violence in

this country. We must do more to stop this

endless loss of life.

Yet contrary to that statement, Feinstein

approves of Obamas plan for war in Syria,

which would place the U.S. military on the

side of the al-Qaeda rebels who are beheading

Syrian Christians with cinder blocks and

machetes. Obama is not content with the rebels

only being armed with knives, however, as his

administration prepares to further arm terrorists

with automatic weapons, which he does not

believe law-abiding citizens should own.

Not even a week after the Navy Yardshooting, Obama told his supporters to go

back at it and push for unconstitutional

legislation that will disarm Americans.

Federal agencies have already begun to

dry up gun supplies in America with massive

firearm and ammunition purchases which

drive private gun owners out of the market.

This is essentially back-door gun control.

In a recent purchase, the Department of

Defense bought millions of rounds of Soviet

7.62x39mm ammo and nearly 600,000 AK-47

magazines. AK-47s, which are chambered for

the 7.62x39mm round, are commonly used by

American gun owners, but not the American

military. They are also used regularly by

al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups around

the world. In his effort to reduce violence,

Obama is arming al-Qaeda extremists while

disarming peaceful Americans.

his own to forcefirearm restrictionsonto the Americanpeople, and ifCongress wouldlike to join himlater, they arewelcome to do so.


21/35

Alternative mediajournalists and

written by:

Kit Danielssomeone who regularly gathers, prepares,

collects, photographs, records, writes, edits,

reports, or publishes on matters of local,

ti l i t ti l t th


22/35

42 43

Media Protection,Media Control:The Death of theFree Press

jbloggers whoare not easilycontrolled by thestate will be leftisolated under thethreat of forceddisclosure.

national, or international events or other

matters of public interest. These definitions

seem to describe the profession rather than

the practice of journalism.

As Kurt Nimmo pointed out in an Infowars.

com article on August 9, 2013, Senator

Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat,

doesnt want the bill, if enacted, to protect

whistleblowers and others who drive out

government corruption. The world has

changed, Schumer said. Were very careful

in this bill to distinguish journalists from

those who shouldnt be protected, WikiLeaks

and all those, and we ve ensured that. Hecontinued, But there are people who write

and do real journalism, in different ways

than were used to. They should not be

excluded from this bill.

If passed, the Free Flow of Information

Act of 2013 wou ld create an offic ial class

of journalists the only class recognized

and protected by the federal government.

Protection will only be provided to preferred

press members who follow, without

question, the official narrative which

covers up the states sinister activities. They

are free from prosecution as long as their

stories support government lies.

Alternative media j ournalists and b loggers

who are not easily controlled by the sta te

will be left is olated under the threat o f

forced disclosure. In other words, the

government will decide who is protectedunder the First Amendment and who is

not, Nimmo wrote on the subject on

Infowars.com dated September 19, 2013. It

will use violenc e to force testimony.

Media shield bills have been considered in

Congress since at least 2007. In 2009, Senator

Chuck Schumer introduced an amendment

to improve that years p roposed Free Flow

of Information Act that would have limited

reporters privilege to only salaried employees

and independent contractors of media outlets.

The bill ultimately died in committee. The

current iteration of the Free Flow of

Information Act only benefits controlled

members of the mainstream media, not

independent freelancers or non-salaried

bloggers who are the spiritual successors

of the citizen journalists that dominated

the free press when James Madison wrotethe First Amendment.

In yet another attempt to kill free speech,

the United States Congress is considering

legislation that would allow the federal

government unparalleled control over

mass media and excessive authority to

attack those critical of the state. Back in May,

Representative Ted Poe, a Texas Republican,

introduced the Free Flow of Information Act

of 2013 (H.R. 1962), a bill intended to protect

journalists f rom being forced to reveal their

confidential news sources to federal investigators

except under specific circumstances. One of these

circumstances includes harm to national security

with the objecti ve to prevent such har m.

This bill effectively means little to journalists

exposing unconstitutional abuses because federal

entities could easily declare that classified leaksfrom confidential sources harm national security.

In essence, H.R. 1962 offers a stronger foothold for

the federal government to attack whistleblowers

such as Edward Snowden or former CIA agent

Jeffrey Sterling. In a 21 ruling in July, the U.S.

Court of Appeals ordered veteranNew York Times

journalist James Risen to testify whether Sterling

leaked classified information to him regarding

Operation Merlin, a covert CIA operation which

delivered flawed nuclear blueprints to the Iranians.

Writing for the majority, Chief Judge Traxler

said that there is no First Amendment testimonial

privilege, absolute or qualified, that protects a

reporter from being compelled to testify about

criminal conduct and that the reporter must

appear and give testimony just as every other

citizen must. Back in May 2011, Attorney General

Eric Holder approved a subpoena that demanded

Risen confirm that his Operation Merlin source wasin fact Sterling. Risen responded to the subpoena

by asserting that both the First Amendment and

federal common-law reporters privilege protected

him from forced testimony.

A United States district court ruled partly in

favor for Risen, stating that he had a qualified

First Amendment reporters privilege that may be

invoked when a subpoena either seeks information

about confidential sources or is issued to harass

or intimidate the journalist. The U.S. Court of

Appeals decision, however, reversed this ruling. In

support of its decision, the appeals court referenced

the 1972 Supreme Court caseBranzburg v. Hayes

which invalidated the First Amendment as a

defense for journalists compelled to testify against

their confidential sources.

Althou ghBran zburg ruled against reporters

privilege under the Press Clause of the FirstAmendme nt, Ju stice B yron Wh ite sa id that the

federal government must convincingly show

a substantial relation between the information

sought and a subject of overriding and

compelling state interest. But if enacted into

law, H.R. 1962 could lessen the governments

burden of showing overriding and compelling

state interest by allowing the immediate claim

of harm to national security. Journalists

are being offered a watered-down federal

shield law that deceptively increases the

governments ease at which it can punish

federal whistleblowers.

Additionally, H.R. 1962 defines a journalist

protected under the bill as a person engaged in

journalism for financial gain or livelihood and

extends protection to the journalists supervisor,

employer, parent, subsidiary, or affiliate. The

Senate version of this bill (S. 987) gives an evenmore rigid definition of a protected journalist as

A l iPh 5S

written by:

Anthony Gucciardi


23/35

44 45

Apple iPhone 5S:Big Brothers DreamCome TrueThe Latest iPhone Is an Ode to Biometrics, Spying,and the Big Brother Control Grid

The latest series of Apples

iPhone will not only continue

to cultivate numerous apps that

track your location through GPS

and transmit data directly back

to corporations and government, but will also

contain a fingerprint sensor that stores your

fingerprint in order to purchase apps and

unlock the phone for use.

And thats really just the beginning. As

millions will most likely continue through the

Apple food chain and purchase this phone,

the NSA and bloated federal government at

large will be beyond ecstatic. Because after

all, its a real dream come true for the Big

Daddy government spy state. No longer will

you actually need to be arrested to gatheryour fingerprints millions nationwide will

willingly submit their biometrics to a database

that most certainly is accessible by Apple and

big government.

But dont worry, the same company that

has given away all of your chats and personal

data through the NSAs top secret PRISM

program says that youre perfectly safe.

Security experts and high level tech analysts,

however, seem to disagree. In addition to the

fact that it seems consumer trust is all but

dead in regards to Apple and its ties to the

spying grid, it seems these safety features

are actually quite vulnerable in reality, to the

point now where hackers can access a massive

database of fingerprints just waiting to be

These safetyfeatures areactually quitevulnerable inreality, to thepoint now wherehackers canaccess a massivedatabase offingerprints justwaiting to betaken and utilizedfraudulently.

taken and utilized fraudulently.

Of course, Apple claims that the fingerprint

scans will be local on your hardware,

but the NSA and FBI would not let such a

precious database go to waste. We already

know that corporations are making big bucks

spying on the data of consumers. So in the

event that Apple is holding some of these

fingerprints, despite what they say, a database

of the fingerprints could be compromised.

And I dont think encryption will stop much.

The print is also used to verify app purchases,

which leads me to believe that this at least

would be stored through a third party.

According to a security specialist on CNET:

So can biometric authentication be

hacked? Almost certainly. Im sure thatsomeone with a good enough copy of your

fingerprint and some rudimentary materials

engineering capability or maybe just a

good enough printer can authenticate his

way into your iPhone The final problem

with biometric systems is the database. If the

system is centralized, there will be a large

database of biometric information thats

vulnerable to hacking.

As we inch towards a world in which our

electronics are based around biometrics, it

becomes an eerie reality that our Big Daddy,

Big Brother system is continually holding our

hands as we walk right into the current spy

system that our overlords continue to assert

does not exist.

M D d d Al

written by:

Kurt Nimmo


24/35

46 47

Matt Drudge was spot on

this September. He called

Senator Dianne Feinstein

a fascist after she had the

gall to define who is and

who is not a journalist.

Feinstein and another Democrat, New York

Senator Chuck Schumer, are pushing a bill

that claims to shield journalists from the

government. It received a thumbs up in the

Senate Judiciary Committee on a bipartisan

vote. Feinstein and Schumer like to pretend

the proposed law offers legal protections

to journalists engaged in news-gathering

activities, protections already afforded by

the First Amendment. If the government

decides, however, it has reasonable

exceptions under national security, itwill allow federal law enf orcement to

Matt Drudge and AlexJones: 17-Year OldBloggers

compel information that would mitigate

terrorist threats.

In other words, the government will

decide who is protected under the First

Amendment and who is not. It wil l use

violence to force testimony.

This is normal behavior for government. It

compels obedience at gun-point every day

of the week. It hates the idea that you are

sovereign and have the right to not testify,

to remain silent. Conscription of witnesses

is no more justified than conscription into

the armed forces or into any other serviceor occupation. Freedom and individual

rights must extend to all institutions and all

branches of life, even into the judiciary, the

heart of state power, said M urray Rothbard.

The terrorism ruse will give the government

all the pretext it needs to force journalists to

testify, so Chuckie Schumers law is basically

meaningless. The real purpose of this law

is to allow the government to define who

is and who is not a journalist. Feinstein has

made this abundantly clear. I cant support

it if everyone who has a blog has a special

privilege or if Edward Snowden were to sit

down and write this stuff, he would have a

privilege. Im not going to go there, she said.

In order to make unbridled state power

somewhat palatable, Feinstein, Schumer

and the Senate Judiciary said it will allow

freelancers, part-timers, and studentjournalists to practice the First Amendment.

Feinstein and Schumer Are Preparing to Wage War

on the Alternative Media

A government judge, they decided, would

be permitted to extend First Amendment

protection to anybody engaged in legitimate

news-gathering activities.

K i i d th t ill d id

The governmentwill decide who

written by:

Julie Wilson

Fox News Demonizes Second

fascist, because she assumes the authority to

officially declare who is a journalist covered

by the First Amendment and who is a criminal

revealing national security secrets.

F i t i S h d th th i i


25/35

48 49

Keep in mind the government will decide

what is a legitimate news-gathering activity.

Feinstein said a 17-year old blogger is not

a journalist. Neither is Edward Snowden,

or we must assume, Glenn Greenwald,

the newspaper journalist who reported on

Snowdens NSA revelations.The Los Angeles

Timesunderscored the governments caveat:

But the bill also makes it clear that the legal

protection is not absolute. Federal officials

still may compel disclosure from a journalist

who has information that could stop or

prevent crimes such as murder, kidnapping, orchild abduction, or prevent acts of terrorism

or significant harm to national security.

Its pretty obvious whats going on here. Like

the Soviet Union and Red China, or any other

authoritarian dictatorship, the state reserves

the absolute right to determine who is a

journalist and who is a 17-year old blogger.

Thats why Matt Drudge called Feinstein a

is protectedunder the FirstAmendment andwho is not. It willuse violence toforce testimony.

P

olitical activist and second

year law student, Nicholas

Somberg, holds For Liberty

Fridays in Lake Orion,Michigan, where he and

his fellow patriots assemble in the name

of liberty. On September 18, the patriots

were gathered on Sombergs private

property promoting liberty and the Second

Amendment by waving signs that read

Dont Tread on Me, Honk 4 Liberty, and

End the Fed to passing traffic when police

arrived. Somberg, 24, who was practicing his

Second Amendment right by openly carrying

a rifle, which is legal under Michigan state

law, was ordered by police to immediately

put his weapon down.

Dont point that rifle at me. I dont

want thi s to be a bad situa tion, s aid the

officer. A video taken of the confrontation

clearly illustrates that at no point was

the activist pointing the rifle at p olice,

however, per the officers order, Sombergput the rifle down. Police then ordered

the activist to move towards them, but

Somberg, knowing his innocence, told the

police to get off his property.

As the 24-year old moves towards police,

the sergeant said I dont want to shoot

you, ok? The sergeant then asked him

to step in front of the police vehicle, but

Somberg pushed back, asking officers why

he was being detained and what crime he

had committed. Sgt. Stoner answered he was

being detained for scaring people.

According to My Fox Detroit, severalpeople (all female callers) called 911 when

they saw a man with a big gun and got

scared. My Fox Detroit opened their report

by immediately demonizing the pro-

Second Amendment activist and citing the

Department of Homeland Security campaign,

If you see something, say something. The

local news station even makes the claim that

some of Sombergs neighbors consider him

a danger to society. Although he was the

one with the rifle, he says he was the one in

the right, says the Fox news reporter. When

citizens are concerned, it is their [ polices]

duty to do something about it.

Then of course, like other liberal anti-gun

pundits have done, the Oakland County

Undersheriff Mike McCabe, capitalizes on

the recent shooting at the Naval Sea Systems

Command Headquarters when he told FoxNews that because of the mass shooting,

people need to put themselves into the

perspective of the police officer. Deputies

dont know if this guy is a Second Amendment

rights person, McCabe said. If its somebody

thats looking for confrontation. They dont

know if hes mentally deranged. They dont

know anything about him. We just had a

deputy stabbed in Williamson county. We

just had a trooper shot in the head. We just

had the incident in Washington D.C. where

a guy with a rifle attacks people. One of the

responding officers was a Washington D.C.police officer that was shot in addition to the

12 or 13 other people that were killed.

Basically what the Undersheriff said was

that because of the crime police face on a

daily basis, Second Amendment supporters

are to be treated like criminals. After

creating the typical dramatic police scene

by calling six police officers to respond and

shutting down a busy street, Sgt. Stoner,

unable to prove Somberg committed a

crime, eventually returned Sombergs gun

and vacated the premises.

Somberg told Infowars before last weeks

incident with the Oakland police that theyve

had nothing but positive feedback. Lots of

cars have been honking for liberty, and one

police officer even stopped by and made a

joke saying Youre not going to give me your

ID, are you? Unfortunately, the local newsdidnt exactly portray the protests in a positive

light. My Fox Detroit wrapped up their news

report by making sure the public knows

theres been 20 mass shootings since 1999.

Once again, this is another example of how

the establishment media fuels hoplophobia

(the fear of armed citizens), when in reality,

statistics show gun crime has decreased by 39

percent since 1993.

Fox News Demonizes SecondAmendment Activist

Drivers Call 911 on Second Amendment Activist Because They

Saw a Man With a Big Gun and Got Scared

Feinstein, Schumer, and the other minions

and grocery clerks working for the state are

determined to criminalize the alternative

media and elevate the corporate media

reading from government scripts. Its a

dangerous situation for state power when

millions of citizens no longer trust the

establishment and prefer to get their news

on the web. Its unacceptable that millions of

people read Matt Drudges website instead of

The New York Timesand The Washington Post.

Its unacceptable that Infowars.com is more

popular than MSNBC.The government has to take out Matt

Drudge and Alex Jones and anybody else

who dares deviate fro m the official sc ript.

Thats what the Media Shield Law is all

about. Its an attempt by government to

define what is journalism and what is not.

Feinstein and Schumer are preparing to

wage war on th e alternative media.

written by:Adan Salazar

Rothschild Ball


26/35

50 51

Photos gathered from a high-

society surrealist ball recall

more of the same type of

strange debauchery Alex Jones

encountered when he successfully

infiltrated the Bohemian Grove. The images

were reportedly snapped by one of the partys

attendees, Alexis von Rosenberg, also known as

the Baron de Red, a prominent French banker

who was close friends with the host of the ball,

Marie-Hlne de Rothschild, of the notorious

Rothschild banking dynasty.

Rothschilds ball was held at one of her

familys expansive estates, the Chteau de

Ferrires, located j ust east of Paris. Attendees

received invitations with text written backwards

and arrived to a mansion bathed in orangelighting meant to represent the building was

on fire. In notes published on the blog Scala

Regia, which were supposedly written by von

Rosenberg to accompany photos of the ball, he

highlights several queer aspects of the night,

concluding that he is barred from repeating

such things now for many reasons. Below are

von Rosenbergs words via Scala Regia.

On 12 December 1972, Marie-Hlne gave

her Surrealist Ball at Ferrires. This time the

guests were asked to come in black tie and long

dresses with Surrealist heads. The invitation

was printed with reversed writing on a blue and

cloudy sky, inspired by a painting by Magritte. To

decipher the card, it had to be held to a mirror

For the evening the chateau was floodlit with

moving orange lights to give the impression that

it was on fire. The staircase inside was lined by

footmen dressed as cats that appeared to havefallen asleep in a variety of staged poses

Guests had to pass through a kind of

labyrinth of Hell, made of black ribbons to look

like cobwebs. The occasional cat appeared to

rescue the guests and lead them to the tapestry

salon. Here they were greeted by Guy with

a hat to resemble a still-life on a platter, and

by Marie-Hlne wearing the head of a giant

weeping tears made of diamonds

Marie-Hlne proved that she had the flare

and imagination to create something unique

and worthwhile. None of this was created by

charm alone. It needed a degree of ruthless

determination. She attended to every minute

detail of style in her life and also in her

entertaining. She was a great hostess with all

the qualities. She loved parties and people.

She was forever in quest of new talent andnew figures to entertain from the world of the

arts, literature, dance, andhaute couture. She

mixed them with the more established set of

Paris society. Everyone was intrigued. Marie-

Hlnes parties took on such importance that

one social figure threatened to commit suicide

unless she was invited

It is not possible to repeat such things

now for many reasons. But it is fascinating to

look back and to remember these occasions,

which dominated our thoughts and plans

to such an extent for so many months. I am

happy that I took part in so many, and happy

that I gave some myself.

De Reds writings do nothing to explain the

awkward symbolism portrayed in the p hotos,

such as the photo of a table centerpiece

featuring a babys shattered head and a

dismembered infant resting his head onsome sort of black demon. This fascination

Rothschild BallExposes ElitesFascination WithOccult

with the occult is of the same persuasion Alex Jones encountered

when he snuck into the private Bohemian Grove club hidden deep

within Californias redwood forest. Each year, hundreds of the worlds

most powerful men, from politicians to journalists to entertainment

industry insiders, convene there to conduct bizarre ceremonial rites


27/35

52 53

and rituals, like the sacrificing of human effigies to mock owl gods.

The elite social gatherings eerily awkward theme, black tie, long

dresses & Surrealists heads, is also reminiscent of scenes out of

director Stanley Kubricks 1999 film Eyes Wide Shut, in which the

main character is persuaded into attending a gathering that required

a costume, mask, and secret password in which bizarre sexual orgies

and pseudo-religious rituals were taking place.

written by:

Kit Daniels

34 Percent of AmericansS


28/35

54 55

Congress shallmake no lawrespecting anestablishmentof religion, orprohibiting the free

exercise thereof;or abridging thefreedom of speech,or of the press;or the right of thepeople peaceablyto assemble,and to petitionthe Governmentfor a redress ofgrievances.

Say First AmendmentToo Extreme44 Percent Also Favor the Government ForcingJournalists to Give Up Their News Sources

Ayearly national poll by the

Newseum Institutes First

Amendment Center shows

that 34 percent of Americans

believe the First Amendment

goes too far in the rights it guarantees. That

belief is up 13 percent compared to the results

of the same survey conducted last year, the

largest single-year increase since the center

started the annual surveys in 1997. The First

Amendment Center, based at Vanderbilt

University in Nashville, Tenn., conducted the

national survey of 1,006 American adults in

May.

Its unsettling to see a third of Americans

view the First Amendment as providing too

much liberty, First Amendment Center

President Ken Paulson said. This underscores

the need for more First Amendment

education. If we truly understand the

essential role of these freedoms in a

democracy, were more likely to protect them.

For reference, the text of the First

Amendment reads:

Congress shall make no law respecting an

establishment of religion, or prohibiting the

free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom

of speech, or of the press; or the right of the

people peaceably to assemble, and to petition

the Government for a redress of grievances.

When the poll respondents were asked

to name the five specific rights guaranteed

by the First Amendment, only the freedom

of speech was named by the majority at

59 percent. Less than a quarter of the

respondents, 24 percent, named freedom

of religion; 14 percent recalled the freedom

of the press; 11 p ercent remembered the

freedom of peaceful assembly; and only 4percent knew of their guaranteed freedom

to petition the government. 36 percent of

respondents could not name any of the five

specific rights listed in the First Amendment.

The survey also asked respondents other

related questions. 31 percent agreed that

musicians should not be allowed to sing

songs with lyrics that might offend others.

44 percent favor court orders requiring

journalists to give up their news sources. 80

percent agreed that the news media act as an

independent watch dog over government on

behalf of the people.

Americans remain generally supportive

of First Amendment freedoms, Newseum

Institute CEO Gene Policinski said. But the

inability of most to even name the freedoms,

combined with the increase of those who

think the freedoms go too far, shows how

quickly that support can erode. As a nation,

we must better prepare our fellow and future

citizens for the hard decision of defending

core freedoms against those who would

damage or limit them by violence or by law.

Unfortunately our core freedoms are already

under attack. Infowars.com reported in June

that police arrested a San Diego man, Jeff

Olsen, for writing anti-bank messages in

washable chalk on a public sidewalk. Olsen

said the messages he wrote, such as Shame

on Bank of America, never used profanity.

In 2010, media analyst and political activist

Mark Dice even convinced people to sign

a petition repealing the First Amendment.

He followed up with even more satire this

summer when he asked beach goers to sign

a petition banning Christian symbols from

public view.

The First Amendment Center conducts

the yearly surveys to gauge the publics

opinions and knowledge on issues affecting

the First Amendment. The sampling error

for this years survey is +/- 3.2% at the 95%

confidence level, meaning that when sampling

another group of Americans using the same

methodology, there is only a 1 in 20 chance

the results would differ by more than 3.2%

in either direction. The Newseum Insitute

operates a 250,000 square foot museum of

news and journalism history, aptly called the

Newseum, in Washington, D.C.

Mass Murder Pills

written by:

Julie Wilson


29/35

56 57

The amount ofAmericans prescribed drugs

has surged over 400 percent in the last

10 years. Prescription drug abuse is now

the fastest-growing type of substance

abuse in the United States due to heavily

marketed prescription pills from giant pharmaceutical

companies. Recent studies show 7 in 10 Americans are

taking at least one prescription drug, while half are

prescribed to two or more prescription medications. A

research report conducted by the Mayo Clinic shows

antidepressants, antibiotics, and painkiller opiates as

the most commonly consumed prescription drug. More

than

infowars the magazine - vol. 2 issue 2 - october 2013

Documents