12 June 2014

INNER METROPOLITAN COMMITTEE OF DAC - AGENDA ITEM 3.1

Officer: Gabrielle McMahon Planning & Assessment Division

Department of Planning, Transport & Infrastructure

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PLANNING REPORT PAGES

AGENDA REPORT 2-27

POLICIES 28-54

ZONING MAPS 55-59

ATTACHMENTS

LOCALITY MAP/ PLANS / DOCUMENTS FROM APPLICANT 60-198

GOVERNMENT ARCHITECT 199-201

ADELAIDE CITY COUNCIL 202

REPRESENTATIONS 203-210

APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO REPRESENTATIONS 211-215

12 June 2014

P1

AGENDA ITEM: IMDAC 3.1

Application No: 020/0010/14A

KNET Reference: 2014/08872/01 (8595399)

Applicant: Parkland Vista Pty Ltd, C/- The Transpac Group Pty Ltd

Proposal: Demolition of an office building and the construction of a 13 level

building, comprising 11 levels of apartments, ground and

mezzanine level office accommodation and a partially covered

rooftop terrace

Subject Land: 138, 139 and 139A South Terrace, Adelaide

Relevant Authority: Inner Metropolitan Development Assessment Committee of the

Development Assessment Commission

Role of the Commission: Schedule 10(4B) of the Development Regulations 2008:

Development that exceeds $10m in the City of Adelaide

Zone / Policy Area: City Frame Zone

Categorisation: Merit

Notification: Category 2

Representations: Two (2) and one out of time

Lodgement Date: 16 April 2014

Council: Adelaide City Council

Development Plan: 30 January 2014

Referral Agencies: Government Architect (Pre-lodgement agreement)

Officers Report: Gabrielle McMahon

Recommendation: Planning Consent

PLANNING REPORT

1. PROPOSAL

The proposal is for the demolition of an office building and the construction of a 13 level building,

comprising 11 levels of apartments, ground and mezzanine level office accommodation and a

partially covered rooftop terrace and comprises the following:

Maximum building height of 45.5m to the top of the roof/plant screen (87.90m AHD). The

height to the top of the parapet on level 12 is 41.1m. The roof top level will be setback some

7m from South Terrace and 6m from the north.

11 apartments (one apartment per floor over 11 levels) comprising the following:

- A total area of 333m2

- 225m² of internal living space

- 48m² of internal garaging. Each apartment has two car parks located within the

apartment itself, accessed via a car lift. These spaces are adaptable and can be

converted to another use should two spaces not be required (i.e storage/gallery). The

northern garage is partly glazed to provide a feature to the living area; the southern

garage is wider to provide for additional storage and flexibility of use should the

occupants not have a second vehicle

- 48m² of private open space – being two balconies with one to the north and one to the

south

- Three bedrooms, study

A roof garden with an open terrace, decking and swimming pool (205m²), internal pavilion

space and amenities area (93m²). The area will be accessible to all residents and guests

Office accommodation on the ground and mezzanine with a total floor area of 177m²

The office has access to six car parking spaces within a car stacker at the rear of the ground

floor

12 June 2014

P2

All vehicle access is via Stafford Lane

Separate lobbies/entrances from South Terrace for the office and residential components

External materials include:

- a mixture of glazing, timber veneer, steel framing, powder coated metal cladding and

off-white precast concrete

- Solar panels and plant/equipment are proposed on top of the roof over the roof pavilion

and are to be screened from view

- Public art is proposed in the form of a sculptural element within the eastern/residential

area

Ground floor contains visitor bicycle parking along South Terrace, internal storage for 14

bicycles, bin store, a vehicle turntable, vehicle stackers, car lift, services and transformer

room

The proposed staging of the development approval process is as follows:

Stage 1: removal of building and landscape items and the level and prepare site for new

works; and Stage 2: Construction of the proposed building

12 June 2014

P3

2. DEVELOPMENT PLAN POLICY SUMMARY

The subject site is located within the City Frame Zone. In summary the relevant Zone policies

seek the following outcomes:

City Frame Zone

Primarily contain medium to high scale residential development supported by a mix of

shops, personal services, restaurants, cafés, and community and hospitality uses.

Mix of complementary land uses will extend activity into the evening to enhance the

vibrancy and safety of the area, particularly the adjacent Park Lands and Whitmore and

Hurtle Squares, which offer a high level of amenity.

Small-scale licensed entertainment premises, nightclubs or bars may occur in limited

numbers where they are designed and sited to maintain day and evening activation at street

level.

Development will include residential and mixed use residential buildings that are well

connected to nearby public transport networks, including the tramline.

Location and scale of buildings will achieve high quality urban design outcomes, with the

highest built form located along South Terrace facing the Park Lands with a slightly lower

built form framing the Squares.

Development on key corner sites at the entrances to the City grid and Squares will create

landmark buildings that provide a strong built form edge and pedestrian scale detailing to

both street frontages.

Buildings will have minimal or no setback and provide tall walls when viewed from the main

road frontage to achieve a consistent built form façade.

Landscaping and small variations in front setback will assist in softening the continuous

edge of new built form and provide a higher amenity streetscape and pedestrian

environment which is shaded by street trees and other mature vegetation.

Buildings will have a strong horizontal emphasis with clearly defined and segmented vertical

elements.

At street level, the use of solid materials will be appropriately balanced with glazed areas to

provide visual interest and activity. Tall façades will be well articulated with finer details that

contribute positively to the public realm, including modelled façades, canopies, fenestration

and balconies that make use of light and shade.

An interesting pedestrian environment and human scale at ground level which integrates

well with the Park Lands and Squares will be created.

A range of land uses will be provided that add to the range of local employment

opportunities and the availability of services and shopping facilities within the main street.

12 June 2014

P4

Catalyst sites provide opportunities for integrated developments on large sites to assist in

the transformation of a locality. Such developments will facilitate growth in residential

population of the City. Development will exemplify quality and contemporary design that is

generally greater in height and, or density, than its surrounds and designed to manage the

interface with sensitive uses in residential zones. NB: It is noted this development is not on

a catalyst site.

Residential (Whitmore East) Zone (RA6)

The site is located adjacent the Residential (Whitmore East) Zone. The height in this zone is 4

building levels or no more than 12m to the ceiling above finished ground level.

Council currently has a Development Plan Amendment (DPA) before the Minister for Planning for

his Approval, which will affect the RA6 Zone. In the DPA it is recommended that the height

remain unchanged, height will no longer trigger the non-complying process. This should open the

way for more developments to be considered on merit.

Council Wide

The Council Wide provisions for City Living and Medium to High Scale Apartments provide

guidance to appropriate housing choice, private open space, minimum unit sizes and the extent of

natural light, ventilation, outlook, and effective design outcomes.

Relevant planning policies are contained in the concluding appendices and relevant zoning maps

are in the attachments. A complete copy of the Adelaide (City) Development Plan is also available

from the DAC dropbox.

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE AND LOCALITY

The subject site is located at 138, 139 and 139A South Terrace, Adelaide and is described as

follows:

Lot No Plan Street Suburb Hundred CT Reference

173 FP 182635 South Terrace Adelaide Adelaide 6110/173

U1 SP 4443 South Terrace Adelaide Adelaide 5023/144

U22 SP 4443 South Terrace Adelaide Adelaide 5023/145

Source: JPE report

12 June 2014

P5

Subject site and view east Apartments to the west

The subject land is rectangular in shape and comprises a total site area of 420m2 with a frontage

of 12.83m to South Terrace and a depth of 32.72m.

The subject site contains two double storey buildings, occupied with a mixture of office,

commercial and residential uses. The land has a secondary frontage to Stafford Lane along the

length of the northern boundary.

4. BACKGROUND

Pre-lodgement Process (summary provided by the Case Manager)

Over the course of the pre-lodgement process, the proposal has undergone a series of

design iterations aimed at managing technical, planning and design related issues.

Through ongoing case management, the proponent has secured a pre-lodgement

agreement with the Government Architect in relation to building design. Similarly,

Adelaide City Council provided ongoing feedback to the pre-lodgement panel, in

particular regarding matters of traffic and waste management, which are detailed further

within the assessment section of this report.

The proposal was presented to the design review panel three times, over which period

the design response evolved into a high quality mixed use commercial/residential

offer. Design review saw ongoing refinements to the residential tower, in particular an

improved architectural expression in relation to neighbouring sites and to the broader

streetscape context. It is noted that further information has been requested in

relation to the materials and details of the final façade design.

The following are considered to be the key design alterations brought about through

design review:

Enhanced modelling and setback of the ground level entry to the north

improving safety and the entry experience for both pedestrians and vehicles.

Reconfiguration of the ground floor layout to improve the sense of address

commensurate with the proposals Parklands location.

Development of the three-dimensional design approach to the architectural

expression of the building that helps to mitigate the overall impression of

bulk and blank walls.

5. AGENCY COMMENTS

Government Architect

The Government Architect provided pre-lodgement agreement, refer to the attachments for a

fully copy of the advice. The following is an extract from the agreement:

The building height in close proximity to the Park Lands is positive, as it frames

Adelaide’s premier urban park and utilises its amenity for more inner city residents. The

scheme’s location generates minimal overshadowing impacts.

12 June 2014

P6

The proposal is built to the boundary on both the north and south street frontages and

the two side boundaries. Pending successful resolution of questions relating to setbacks

with other referral agencies, from a design perspective, Stafford Lane provides sufficient

distance not to require this additional setback from the northern boundary. The additional

floor area that this enables should be supported by high quality details and exemplary

overall design merit. The modelling and setback of the ground level entry to the north

improves safety and the entry experience for pedestrian vehicles.

The ground floor South Terrace frontage includes a residential lobby and commercial

office, with services and vehicular access located to the rear off Stafford Lane. The

configuration of the ground floor layout provides a sense of address commensurate with

the location and stated ambitions of the scheme. However, in order to achieve those

ambitions, it will be important to ensure that waste is removed via Stafford Lane.

The three-dimensional design approach to the architectural expression of the proposal

demonstrates positive portions and articulation. The provision of additional illustrative

material relating to the east and west elevations suggest an approach that will help

mitigate the overall impression of the proposal’s bulk and blank walls from a streetscape

perspective. Delivering a high quality contribution to the streetscape will be critical in

achieving a satisfactory level of overall design quality and is contingent on the resolution

of façade detailing. While the indicated design approach is supported, the materials

palette and detail resolution of these elevations will need to be refined to a satisfactory

level during detailed design development.

To ensure the most successful design outcome is achieved the Development Assessment

Commission may like to consider the following aspect of the project, which would benefit

from protection as part of the planning consent:

That the design intent, as agreed to by the Government Architect, is realised in

the final façade design – requiring submission of further information including a

final materials schedule and typical detail.

Adelaide City Council

As a result of the recent amendments to the Development Regulations, 2008 the Adelaide City

Council is no longer a referral body. However Council staff were involved in the pre-lodgement

process and have provided technical advice.

During the Prelodgement meetings Council raised concerns with the proposed waste management

and traffic arrangements.

Waste collection

Council recommends South Terrace as the location for waste collection (it is noted that the

Government Architect was not supportive of this option as it requires the dragging bins through

the lobby for collection from South Terrace and it significantly impacted the functionality of

internal ground level).

Council do not support the use of O’Halloran Street for waste collection (a number of reasons are

outlined in an attached email from Council). Council also advise it will not undertake a Council

service for Pull in Pull out service from Stafford Lane and if the applicant chooses this option then

they will need to organise a private waste contractor to service the building. The applicant has

chosen this option as being preferable to collection from South Terrace.

Veolia have provided a statement advising that they will be able to complete the services in

accordance with the strategy and undertake waste collection from the site (via Stafford Lane).

12 June 2014

P7

Traffic

Throughout the Prelodgement process Council raised concerns with the carparking and access

arrangement of the proposal. On lodgement the applicant provided a supplementary traffic report

by Phil Weaver dated 4 April 2014, in response to Council concerns. Council advises that the

initial concerns raised still apply although they have no objections to the development going

forward. Refer to the supplementary traffic report for a summary of the issues and Phil Weaver’s

response (and additional turning circle diagrams). The following summarises the issues:

COUNCIL CONCERNS APPLICANTS RESPONSE

(PHIL WEAVER – TRAFFIC CONSULTANT)

ACCESS

Stafford Lane is a narrow road

(while two way it only allows

vehicles to travel in one direction

at a time)

There is the potential for conflict

between vehicles in the peak

hour movements

Cars may have to wait on

Stafford Lane, as there is not

sufficient width to allow two way

traffic movements and to allow

for a car to turn in or out if

another car is waiting

While Stafford Lane has a narrow width, the existing volume

of traffic using this lane is very low. In order to confirm this,

surveys of traffic using the lane were conducted (refer to the

traffic report)

Notwithstanding the narrow width of Stafford Lane, this lane

is currently used to accommodate two-way traffic. It is noted

that:

Passing opportunities are currently provided by the

setback on the corner of the building located at 133 South

Terrace and also the access points into Viterra car park,

The entry into the lane off O’Halloran Street is very open

to view and it is unlikely that a driver wishing to access

would do so until a westbound vehicle has exited the

laneway, and

A driver exiting the subject development would be able to

wait at the eastern end of Stafford lane until an eastbound

vehicle has entered the various car parking areas to the

west of this site.

Restricted sight distance to

Stafford Lane from the east

It is acknowledged that sight distance to the east of the

proposed access point will be restricted by the transformer, it

is noted that:

The eastern end of Stafford Lane is essentially a dead end,

There are very infrequent movements of traffic exiting

from the private car park to the east. Given the narrow

width of the lane adjoining the adjacent car park, travel

speeds of cars exiting this private car park are very low,

There would be an opportunity to install mirror(s) within

the building to improve the level of sight distance to the

east (and also to the west).

There is no space on site to wait

for a car to enter/exit if the

turntable is in use

Refer to Figure 5 which demonstrates that it would be

possible for a vehicle to wait within the car park when the

turntable is in use without compromising the use of the

turntable based on a marginal shift to the south of the

turntable.

All vehicles have to exit south,

one way along O’Halloran Street

to South Terrace

Given the relatively low volumes of traffic using both

O’Halloran Street and Stafford Lane and the forecast low level

of traffic forecast for the subject development. Phil Weaver

considers that there would not be any adverse traffic impacts

on either O’Halloran Street or South Terrace as a result of the

proposed development.

12 June 2014

P8

Collection of waste – the

proposed use of Stafford Lane by

a private contractor (Stafford

Lane operates left in and left out.

The road width is not sufficient to

turn around without using private

land and would require the refuse

vehicle to either reverse in or out

of Halloran Street). ACC Waste

Management has advised that

this is not acceptable

There would be an opportunity to turn a small refuse vehicle

on site as demonstrated by Figures 6 and 7. While this

turning path is based on an SRV design vehicle it is

understand that a range of such vehicles are able to be

accommodated. These vehicles would have lengths of

between 6m and 7m and would have a turning circle of less

than 13m

PARKING

Office parking - drivers would be

required to drive forward into the

car stacker and reverse out onto

a turntable to exit the site in a

forward direction.

Residential parking:- drivers are

required to drive forward into a

car lift and reverse out, no

visibility to a car exiting the car

stacker

Concerns that “the turntable for

the car stacker associated to the

office use will be accessible to

residential vehicles from the car

lift. It is not demonstrated that

this is feasible and it is likely that

if the turntable is not quick to use

then drivers are likely to reverse

out onto Stafford Lane”.

The timing or operation of the

turntable - it is still considered

likely that drivers may choose to

reverse to the street.

Based on minor changes to the design, Phil Weaver considers

that drivers accessing the car stackers would not be required

to use the turntable. In order to demonstrate this aspect the

traffic consultant has prepared additional turning path

drawings (refer to traffic report) and concludes that each of

the turning path movements would be appropriate given that

the proposed development relates to a small scale long term

car park generating infrequent traffic movements.

There is sufficient physical separation between the car lift and

the stacker for reversing out to not be an issue. It is also

expected that drivers entering the lift would most probably

use the turntable to turn on site and to then reverse into the

lift, thereby being in a position when leaving the car park to

exiting the lift in a forward motion directly onto Stafford Lane.

A typical turntable, as proposed within this development,

would rotate through 360 degrees at one revolution per

minute. Hence, a driver would be able to turn through 180

degrees in approximately 30 seconds. Phil Weaver therefore

considers that this would provide a practical means of drivers

turning on site and it is most unlikely that drivers would

choose to reverse onto Stafford Lane.

Disabled car park is proposed on

South Terrace and this is not a

suitable solution to Council

It is not possible to provide an indirectly accessible space for

disabled use on site in accordance with AS/NZS 2890.6:2009.

The provision of such a space on-street, as an alternative

means of accommodating disabled parking, would potentially

assist the many businesses within the locality where such

parking is not provided on site and would be an overall

benefit to this area

There should be minimal deliveries generated by the

proposed development given the small scale office use and

the mostly residential nature of the proposed development.

12 June 2014

P9

TRAFFIC GENERATION

No review of existing traffic

volumes or movement patterns,

given two other residential

buildings and a car park have

access to Stafford Lane and have

to exit south via O’Halloran

Street to South Terrace

A detailed assessment of existing traffic volumes has been

provided in this report. This shows that even in peak hour

periods there are very low volumes of traffic using Stafford

Lane and it is apparent that two-way traffic volumes are

accommodated notwithstanding the narrow width of the lane

It should be assumed that the

office component is likely to be

fully utilised during peak periods,

worst case scenario

A ‘worst case’ assessment has been considered in respect to

the traffic generation of the subject development

The analysis of the timing and

operation of the car stacker/lift

does not take into consideration

the operation of the turntable and

that only one car can enter and

exit the site at any one time. It is

likely that the turnaround time

would be longer than that stated,

particularly on exit.

This may also be compounded by

alternating movements e.g. in

the am peak office spaces

entering and residential spaces

exiting and vice versa in the pm

peak. There is no provision for a

driver to wait on site and

insufficient width on street

Even taking into account the use of the turntable, I consider

that an average service rate of approximately 1 minute for

each vehicle entering and exiting the car park. On this basis,

I consider that there would be no significant change to on-site

queuing compared to the calculations provided within my

previous report

6. NOTIFICATION

The development is deemed a Category 2 development by PDC 28 2(b)(ii) for the City Frame

Zone. Two representations were received in time and one outside of time. All three representrors

are located in the ALTA Apartments at 135 South Terrace and made the same comments.

The following is a summary of the main comments made:

The height of the building is not in keeping with the existing street landscape and exceeds

36 metres and is at odds with the Development Plan.

As it is a narrow allotment, the proposed building will look out of proportion compared to

adjoining properties. The building will create overshadowing in the Veale Gardens due to its

height.

The narrow lane immediately behind ALTA which is used to access the Alta building seems

at threat with increased traffic flow. Details of how such an increase may be managed are

sought.

ALTA Apartments is a high quality building such a standard must be maintained in any

future development

An engineering report is required to ensure that the work will not prejudice ALTA.

Should construction proceed, guarantees are sought that:

12 June 2014

P10

- Excavation will not be such that it threatens the structure of ALTA. Before excavation

commences, a report from a professional body qualified in this field should be submitted

to ALTA for consideration.

- Noise will be kept to a minimum. No work to be done on site prior to 7 a.m. or after 6

p.m Monday to Friday. No work to be done on weekends or public holidays. Noise to be

contained within acceptable levels, if guidelines for this exist.

- Access to the rear lane and to ALTA garage should be clear at all times.

- Should any section of ALTA be exposed to the elements as a result of construction then

that section be protected in an acceptable manner until construction is completed and

that section is protected again by the abutting building.

Refer to attachments for the applicant’s response to the representations. It is considered that this

adequately addresses the matters raised.

7. PLANNING ASSESSMENT

The relevant provisions of the Development Plan are provided in the appendices at the

conclusion of this report.

Table 1: QUANTITATIVE REQUIREMENTS

Proposal Actual/Proposed DP Guideline Assessment

Site Area 420m2 N/A N/A

Building

Height

45.5m City Frame Zone PDC

14(a) Maximum height

of 36 metres

PDC 15(a) Minimum

height 4 storeys

Council Wide Built Form & Townscape provisions

X

Exceeds the maximum

height by 9.5m to the

topmost structure (plant

and equipment, which is

setback from the

boundaries. It exceeds the

height by 5.5m to the top of the parapet to level 12.

This is discussed in detail later in the report

Building

Height in

AHD (OLS)

87.90m AHD Council Wide PDC 172:

Buildings & structures

must not adversely

affect long term

operational safety and

commercial

requirements of

Adelaide International Airport

√

Proposed height does not

trigger a Mandatory

referral to Adelaide Airport

Land uses Residential, commercial, Desired character for

City Frame Zone - Obj 1

to 8 and PDCs 1 to 4

√

Apartment

size

3 bedroom

(total no. 9)

A total area of 333m2

(225m2 internal area)

80m2 √

Generous apartment sizes

12 June 2014

P11

Proposal Actual/Proposed DP Guideline Assessment

are proposed

Private

Open Space

3 Bedroom 48m2 15m2 √

Open space

dimensions

North facing balconies

South facing balconies

Minimum dimension of

2m and well

proportioned, off living

rooms

√

The development

significantly exceeds the

minimum balcony

dimensions and area

required – with high

quality spaces provided to

the north and south of the site.

Addition open space is

provided on the roof top

garden, for access by all

residents.

The Park Lands is also

located adjacent the site

Access to

natural

light and ventilation

All bedrooms and living

areas have a window

Maximum distance of a

habitable room from a

source of natural light

should be no less than

6m

√

Solar

access

All bedrooms and living

areas have a window

CW PDC 58

2 hours direct sunlight

at Winter Solstice to at

least one habitable

room window, at least

20% of the POS &

communal open space

√

Good levels of solar access to all habitable spaces

Storage

areas –

residential apartments

Large apartments with

generous storage areas

(and include extra space

within the internal car parking areas)

1 bed – 8m3

2 bed -10m3

3 bed -12m3

√

Car parking 2 spaces per apartment

(located within

apartment) - total 22 spaces

6 spaces for the office

component (vertically

stacked)

Table Adel/7

No spaces required for residents

1 space per 100

square metres (min).

5 spaces per 100

square metres (maximum)

√

12 June 2014

P12

Proposal Actual/Proposed DP Guideline Assessment

Bicycle

Parking

14 employee and

visitors bicycle parks

will be provided within

the building.

Residents also have

capacity to store their

bicycles within their apartments

Office / retail – 1 per

200 sq metre (plus 2

and 1 per 1,000 sq

metre for visitors) = approx 4 spaces

Residential is 2 spaces

for apartment over

150 sq metre = 22

Total required is 26

√

14 on ground level and

adequate room within the

apartment storage area

Access Vehicle access is via

Stafford Street

Side street (if

applicable)

Access via Stafford lane is

supported.

Council has concerns with

the access arrangements

although does not object

to the development

proceeding

Refer below for details

Setbacks –

front

Building is built to the

South Terrace boundary

Building should be built

to the primary road frontage

√

Setbacks –

rear

No setback is proposed

on the rear boundary.

The entry to the carpark

has a width of 5.85m

City Frame Zone PDC

17 - No minimum where

there is a rear access

way which is wider than

6.5 metres. Where the

access is less than 6.5

metres in width, a

setback distance equal

to the additional width

required to make the

access way 6.5 metres

or more, is required to

provide adequate

manoeuvrability for

vehicles

X

Not achieved - the

development falls

marginally short of the

required access width. This

is considered acceptable,

given the traffic advice from Phil Weaver.

Setbacks –

rear

The building’s lower and

upper levels are built to

the rear boundary (with

the exception of the

rooftop level, which is

setback 6m at a height of 41.1m).

The RA6 Zone is located directly north of the site.

See below for East Elevation

City Frame Zone PDC

18 - Development on

land directly abutting a

Residential Zone should

avoid tall, sheer walls at

the interface by

ensuring walls greater

than 3 metres in height

are setback at least 2

metres from the rear

allotment boundary,

with further articulation

on upper levels

X

Not achieved but

considered acceptable

Lower levels

Notwithstanding that the

building is built to the

boundary on the lower

level, Stafford Lane

provides an adequate

separation from residential

zone (width of 3.28m) and

meets the intent of the

12 June 2014

P13

Proposal Actual/Proposed DP Guideline Assessment

PDC 18 for a 2m setback

at the lower level. It is

also noted that the land

directly north is currently

used as an open lot car

park and warehouse

building. The proposal will

not impact on any existing

development.

Upper level

The proposal does not

meet the second part of

PDC 18, which encourages

further setbacks on upper

building levels.

Notwithstanding this I

consider the proposal to

be acceptable given the

benefit of the separation

afforded by the rear lane

and the proposed building

design (highly articulated

with balconies and a mix

of materials). It is not

considered to be a ‘sheer’

interface. The Government

Architect has considered

this provision and provided

his support for the

proposed setbacks.

Setbacks –

side

Eastern and western

facades are set to the boundary

The balconies have

glazing on the eastern

boundary (see images

below in the red dashed lines)

Habitable rooms and

balconies should be

setback 3m from

adjacent property

boundaries (CW PDC 68)

The intent of the policy is to:

allow for solar

penetration and

ventilation to

apartments and for a

reasonable external outlook; and

so as not to impact on

the future

development of adjoining sites

Partially achieved.

The western setback

complies with the Development Plan

The balconies built to the

eastern boundary do not satisfy CW PDC 68.

It is acknowledged that

the site is constrained by

its width. The balconies

are considered acceptable,

given that there is one

dwelling per floor and that

adequate light and

ventilation will continue to

be provided to apartments

from the north and south,

even in the event that the

property to the east was

Stafford Land

– 3.28m wide

41.1m high to

top of

balustrade

12 June 2014

P14

Proposal Actual/Proposed DP Guideline Assessment

built to the boundary

The variance from the

Development Plan is

considered to be minor

and should not

unreasonably impact the

future developments of

adjoining sites (as there is

opportunity for a design

response to allow for

natural light and

ventilation should they be developed)

Canopy No canopy proposed Required for weather

protection

X

Not achieved, although

there are indented areas

as the front of the building

to provide weather

protection for occupants of the building.

The variance from

Development Plan is

considered acceptable

given the streetscape

character of the area and

lack of canopies and the

width of the site and

potential impacts on the street trees

LAND USE / DESIRED CHARACTER

The City Frame Zone seeks a range of land uses including residential and office uses, with

primarily residential buildings with non-residential development at ground/first floor and

residences above. The proposal is primarily a residential building, with an office component on the

lower and mezzanine levels and accords with the desired uses for the Zone and PDCs 1 -4.

The desired character anticipates buildings with minimal or no setback and provide tall walls when

viewed from the main road frontage, to achieve a consistent built form façade. Buildings will also

have a strong horizontal emphasis with clearly defined and segmented vertical elements.

Objective 2 seeks development that creates a strong edge to the Park Lands and Squares.

The proposal results in a high quality urban design outcome, with a high built form located along

South Terrace facing the Park Lands. The building will create a strong edge to the south parklands

and contribute to the desired uniform streetscape with no front setbacks and a tall, articulated

building facade and accords with objectives 2 and 3 and the desired character statement. It is

noted that there is also a tall built form to the rear of the site, adjacent the residential zone,

where lower built form is anticipated. Building design will be considered later in the report.

12 June 2014

P15

BUILDING HEIGHT

A maximum height of 36m and a minimum height of 4 levels is envisaged in the City Frame Zone

(PDCs 14 and 15). While catalyst site provisions apply in the zone, the subject site is less than

1500 square metres in area and the provisions are not applicable for this development. Objective

7 envisages a transition down in scale and intensity at the zone boundaries to main the amenity

for properties located within adjoining residential zones.

At approximately 45.5m in overall building height the proposal exceeds the maximum height

envisaged by 9.5 metres (although does not exceed airport height restrictions). The height of the

building was discussed in the Prelodgement meetings. Category 2 representors have also raised

the height as an issue of concern, as it does not comply with the zoning provision and they

believe is out of context in the streetscape.

Streetscape studies were provided by the applicant to demonstrate the visual impacts of the

proposed height in the context of the locality (and also the potential for future development given

the zoning) (see below). The planning report prepared by Planning Chambers also provided

context for support of the proposed height.

12 June 2014

P16

Source: JPE Design Studio

In a policy context, the City Frame Zone envisages heights of up to 36 metres, except on large

sites where the buildings can be integrated to assist in the transformation of a locality (catalyst

sites). These buildings are expected to exemplify quality and contemporary design that is

generally greater in height, or intensity, than its surroundings and will be designed to manage the

interface with sensitive uses in Residential Zones, particularly with regards to massing,

proportions, overshadowing, traffic and noise related impacts.

While there are no specific zone provisions that encourage higher developments that are not on a

catalyst site, the proposal is a merit use and Council Wide policies and the context of the locality

need to be given due consideration. The diagrams above are useful to provide context.

The following provisions are relevant and have been considered in the assessment of height:

173 Development in a non-residential Zone that abuts land in a Residential Zone …. should provide a

transition between high intensity development and the lower intensity development in the adjacent

Zone by focussing taller elements away from the common Zone boundary. 271 Development located either abutting, straddling or within 20 metres of a Zone or Policy Area

boundary should provide for a transition and reasonable gradation from the character desired from one to the other.

272 Development should not unreasonably restrict the development potential of adjacent sites, and

should have regard to possible future impacts such as loss of daylight/sunlight access, privacy and outlook.

The following are the arguments put forward by the applicant (in the report from Planning

Chambers) in support of the proposed height:

If taken from the predominate building height, the parapet of the 12 level and not the inset roof of the roof top deck/pavilion, the building is generally 5.5m over the maximum height.

The Capital City Zone is located approximately 30 metres to the north east and 60 metres to

the east along South Terrace, which allows for the consideration of buildings of 53 metres in height

The Optus Tower on the corner of King William Street and South Terrace (approx. 100

metres from the site), is significantly taller with a height over 60 metres. The Optus building

provides a distinctive backdrop to the subject land when viewed from the west along South

Terrace

It is understood that the recently approved Vue Residential Development on King William Street to the east of the site has a building height of over 80 metres

As shown within the streetscape study prepared by JPE the proposed height and mass will fit

comfortably within the future streetscape and context sought by the Development Plan,

providing a transition down from the Optus Tower and taller development within the Capital

City Zone to the north west and west

The Capital City Design Review Panel has indicated during the review sessions that the

height was considered appropriate in terms of the overall design and form of the building.

The current height results in a more slender and elegant building relatively to the width and would potentially be ‘too squat’ should it be reduced to the maximum height recommended

Given the level of articulation and detailing across all of the facades and the narrow width of

the building the overall bulk and mass is reduced such that the visual impact of the

development is considered to be acceptable and not overbearing within the existing context or potential future development of the locality

The additional height proposed does not pose any overshadowing issues as South Terrace and the Park Lands are immediately to the south

The proposed height assists in presenting a clear, well defined built form edge to South

Terrace and the Park Lands

12 June 2014

P17

The site has a good level of accessibility to public transport including tram services along

King William Street to the east and bus services along South Terrace, King William Street

and Morphett Street and as such is considered to be a reasonable location for an increase in residential density

The proposal exceeds the height requirement by between one and two floors. The applicant

has indicated that it is these additional floors that allow the project to incorporate new and

innovative approaches to car parking along with the desired mixture of land uses; within the

office space accounting for the two lower floors. Without the additional height the benefits of

an active frontage to South Terrace and the absence of car park screening at the lower

levels would be economically difficult to provide

The majority of the additional height proposed is due to the inclusion of the roof top deck

and screening of the solar panels, plant and equipment located upon the roof; accounting

for an additional 4.1 metres. It is considered that the benefits provided by the roof deck and

the screening of the plant and equipment outweigh any potential visual impact, especially

given that the roof deck is set in from the edges of the building and surrounded by a glazed balustrade

It is considered unlikely that when viewed from within the locality, or even further afield,

with the Optus building and Capital City Zone providing a backdrop of taller development,

that the additional 5.5 to 9.5 metres of building height proposed would be apparent to such

a degree to negatively impact upon the view of the city skyline

The proposed building height, whilst taller than the recommended maximum, is considered to be

acceptable given the considerations outlined above. The quality of the design and the attention to

detailing has produced a building that displays a high level of interest to all facades. This is

necessary given the level of exposure that the building is likely to have in the short to medium

term until additional development is undertaken along this section of South Terrace. The Optus

Tower and nearby Capital City Zone will still take pride of place within the skyline, as sought by

the Development Plan, with the subject site providing an appropriately detailed and designed

building that provides the desired level of built form along South Terrace to define the southern

edge of the City.

Assessment

I generally agree with the comments made by Planning Chambers above, in particular that the

development will not appear to be 45.5m high given the upper level setback. The development

will generally read as 41.1 metres high (although this still exceeding the height requires by

5.5m). In addition the building is in close proximity to the Capital City Zone and in the cityscape

will not be out of context with the approved and desired developments in this zone. It is also

considered to be a high quality design that should contribute to South Terrace. The additional

9.5m of height over the policy guideline is unlikely to make any real discernible difference when

the building is viewed in the cityscape or streetscape views.

The proposed building will reinforce and strengthen the character of South Terrace, with a strong

built edge to the Park Lands. I believe that the proposed height of the building will not detract

from the existing or desired character of the locality and is unlikely to result in any significant

impacts to adjoining land uses. It will not result in any overshadowing to the north. It will result

in some overshadowing to the east and west and overshadowing to the Park Lands. This is not

considered to be excessive and these sites will continue to achieve adequate solar access and in

the context of a city location this is considered reasonable.

It is noted that the proposal does not provide a transition in scale with the residential zone to the

rear as desired (CW PDC 173, 271). On the other hand it can be argued that the proposal does

provide a transition in scale with the Capital City Zone which is approximately 30m to the north

east. This Concept Plan for the Capital City Zone envisages developments in this locality up to a

height of 53m. In addition, from a design perspective it is considered that Stafford Lane provides

a sufficient separation distance so that an additional setback from the northern boundary is not

considered necessary.

12 June 2014

P18

The success of the development relies on a high quality building that exemplifies a high quality

and contemporary design. The Government Architect supports the proposal and has advised that:

The three-dimensional design approach to the architectural expression of the proposal

demonstrates positive portions and articulation. The provision of additional illustrative

material relating to the east and west elevations suggest an approach that will help

mitigate the overall impression of the proposal’s bulk and blank walls from a streetscape

perspective.

The Government Architect advises that the materials, palette and detail resolution on the

elevations need further refinement during detailed design development.

Should support be given for a building at this height, I believe it should be based upon achieving

an exemplary and contemporary building, as a driving rationale. It is important that the high

quality design and use of materials proposed for the development should not be diminished

through any subsequent applications. Should the Commission grant Planning Consent to this

application a reserve matter is recommended with regards to the final details for materials and

finishes (to the satisfaction of the Commission, in consultation with the Government Architect).

PEDESTRIAN AMENITY / FUNCTIONAL SPACES

The combined ceiling height of the ground floor and mezzanine (5.7m) satisfies the requirement

of PDC 10 for a minimum floor to ceiling height of 3.5 metres for ground floor spaces.

The ground floor frontage to South Terrace is permeable and satisfies the minimum of 70%

sought by PDC 11.

Pedestrian shelter and shade over footpaths is not provided as required by PDC 9. The rationale is

the potential impact of the South Terrace street trees. Two indented lobbies have been provided

as a result and whilst they do not provide protection for general users of the adjacent footpath

they do protect users of the building as they enter and exit. This is consistent adjoining residential

and commercial land uses along South Terrace.

Vehicle access is provided to the rear of the site and therefore there will be no impact on

pedestrian amenity on South Terrace through vehicle crossovers. This is strongly supported as a

desired outcome.

TRANSPORT, ACCESS AND PARKING

A traffic report has been provided by Phil Weaver, dated 21 February 2014 and supplementary

comments dated 4 April 2014 (in response to Council concerns). Council raised a number of

concerns with the operational aspects of the car park, including vehicles potentially not exiting in

a forward fashion, blind spots along Stafford Lane, the narrow nature of Stafford Lane, congestion

within the building with no adequate holding bays, waiting times for occupants of the building,

potential for collision between vehicles existing the residents car lift and the office car lift. While

Council is not satisfied with the additional information from Phil Weaver, they advise that they do

not object to the development proceeding. The issues raised and the applicant’s response have

been summarised elsewhere in this report.

I acknowledge that the access arrangements will be tight and that Stafford Lane is narrow and

may result in some congestion. However the expected vehicle movements from the development

are considered to be low, vehicles speeds to be slow and that the proposal is unlikely to result in

any significant traffic issues. Any significant inconvenience is likely to be to the users of the

facility and not people external to the site. The matters raised are not fundamental to the success

of the development and should be able to be resolved in design development stage.

Notwithstanding Council’s concerns, I consider that as the proposal is unlikely to detrimentally

impact adjoining users or be a significant safety concern then the access arrangements are

acceptable (and will be modified by the applicant if found not to work effectively).

12 June 2014

P19

The proposal is unique in that it will provide car parking for residences within their own

apartments, accessed by a car lift. These spaces are adaptable should two car parking spaces per

apartment not be required. Appropriate acoustic treatment and ventilation of the spaces and the

car lift are essential to ensure residents are not unreasonably impacted. The applicant has

provided reports addressing these matters (refer to the ESD section below).

Six car parking spaces are provided for the office component, which are to be stacked on the

eastern side of the building.

In summary the number and location of car parks provided are satisfactory and access via the

rear is supported.

The collection of waste from Stafford Lane can be managed through a private contractor. While

Council would prefer collection to be from South Terrace they are not opposed to the proposed

arrangements. A waste management report is required and is recommended as a condition of

Consent.

DESIGN, MASSING AND ARTICULATION, ACTIVE FRONTAGES

The Development Plan provides guidance with respect to the design elements sought for

development of the type proposed. For example:

Council Wide Objective 48 seeks development that incorporates a high level of design

excellence in terms of scale, bulk, massing, materials, finishes, colours & architectural

treatment.

Council Wide PDC 168 seeks development of a high standard of design that reinforces the grid

layout and distinctive urban character of the City by maintaining a clear distinction between

the following:

(a) the intense urban development and built-form of the town acres in the Capital City, Main

Street, City Frame and Residential Zones;

(b) the less intense and more informal groupings of buildings set within the landscaped

environment of the Institutional Zones;

(c) the historic character of the North Adelaide Historic (Conservation) Zone; and

(d) the open landscape of the Park Lands Zone.

Council Wide Principle 121 requires development to be designed and sited to ensure an

adequate level of daylight, to minimise overshadowing of buildings and public and private

outdoor spaces, particularly during the lunchtime breaks, while Council Wide Principle 222

requires development fronting public spaces to be designed and sited to minimise

overshadowing of the Square’s garden areas.

Council Wide Principle 37 (Visual and Acoustic Privacy) requires direct overlooking from

external balconies and rooftop gardens to be minimised by various means, including the use of

building setbacks, screening devices, window orientation and landscaping.

The building is located on one of Adelaide’s premier Terraces, framing the Park Lands and will

support an active use on street level while increasing residential population with access to the

Park Lands and should be a positive contribution to the area.

The applicant has undergone three sessions with the City Design Review process and the proposal

has changed over time in response to the comments made. The proposal has a Pre-lodgement

agreement from the Government Architect. The overall height, scale and setbacks of the new

building is supported. The Government Architect advises that the materials palette and detail

resolution of these elevations will need to be refined to a satisfactory level during detailed design

development.

As mentioned previously, should the Commission grant Planning Consent a reserve matter is

recommended in line with the comments of the Government Architect.

12 June 2014

P20

Due to the location on the north side of South Terrace the proposal will not result in significant

levels of overshadowing of adjacent residential premises. The northern properties will not be

affected at all. While there will be overshadowing of the Park Lands this is not considered

excessive or unreasonable, given that there is significant area in the immediate vicinity not cast in

shadow (refer to the shadow diagrams provided).

Services located on the roof will be screened from view.

APARTMENT AMENITY

Medium to high scale residential development should provide for a high standard of amenity and

environmental performance as sought by Council Wide Objective 22 and Principles 49-75. These

provisions provide guidance with respect to the design of building entrances, levels of natural

light and ventilation, private open space, privacy, outlook and minimum apartment sizes. PDC 60,

71, 81 require medium to high scale residential development and serviced apartments to have a

high quality environment by ensuring minimum areas (see table 1).

The apartments proposed are of high quality with a high level of amenity and exceed the

minimum relevant Development Plan provisions. Residents have access to a rooftop garden,

views to the north, south and east (form each apartment), cross ventilation and will benefit from

the proximity to the Park Lands.

ENVIRONMENTAL

Environmental Efficiency

The proposal incorporates passive environmental efficiencies for residential development through

a large floor plate with both a north and south facing outlook for each apartment from primary

living rooms. There is no glazing to the west and minimal to the east and good levels of cross

ventilation. Sustainable efficiency measures include high performance glazing, solar panels,

energy efficient fixtures and fittings, movement sensor activated lighting. These are considered to

be satisfactory.

The proposal generally meets the policies for environmental efficiently and adequate thermal

comfort through passive design techniques and is generally consistent with CW PDCs 107, 108,

109, 111, 114, 115, 116, Obj 33, 34, PDCs 120 to 126.

Crime Prevention through Urban Design

The proposal provides passive surveillance of the site with the mix of land uses and overlooking

into the public realm. There are no significant crime prevention issues. The proposal generally

meets the requirements for CPTUD (CW Obj 24, PDCs 83, 84 85).

Acoustic

The applicant has provided an acoustic report by Resonate, dated 17 April 2014. Consideration

was given to the proposed car lift and potential for noise impacts. Resonate recommended a

number of design elements and acoustic treatments to ensure that the development achieves the

noise requirements in the Development Plan. This included the use of materials to be incorporated

into the development (i.e. thickness of glazing to all living areas and bedrooms for the residential

areas of the building, window and door seals, attenuation measures required for the car parking

areas etc). The type of mechanical plant is yet to be decided, however will be required to meet

relevant BCA standards.

I recommend there be a condition to control noise emissions from externally located plant and

that there be a condition that the recommendations of the Resonate report be implemented and

that noise levels are in accordance with PDC 91 and 92 and the Environmental Protection Act.

Wind

The applicant has provided a wind assessment report by Vipac, dated 21 February 2014. They

advise that the proposal is not expected to generate wind conditions in excess of the criterion for

safety and is likely to satisfy the wind criterion expected for public and private areas.

12 June 2014

P21

The rooftop terrace is very exposed to winds approaching from the SW, west and WNW, which are

expected to possess high velocities. However the proposed design incorporates balustrades at

1.8m in height which will shield the incoming winds. It is expected that the rooftop terrace would

be within the recommended walking criteria. Given that this area is optional and additional open

space for residents, this is not considered to be an area of concern.

Waste

The location and size of the refuse area is considered acceptable. The collection and pickup will

occur by a private contractor, from Stafford Lane and has been considered elsewhere in this

report.

8. CONCLUSION

The proposal satisfies the Development Plan in the following ways:

The mix of land uses with active land uses at ground floor with medium/high density

residential development is supported in the City Frame Zone

The proposed bulk, scale and the design of the residential tower has the support of the

Government Architect

There is a high level of articulation, modelling and detail within the external façades of the

building

The proposal provides a good level of street activation through commercial land uses on

the lower levels and promotes activity and passive surveillance to the surrounding streets

and will be a positive contribution to South Terrace with a strong built edge framing the

Park Lands

The apartments have an excellent level of amenity and functionality and exceed

Development Plan requirements

The proposal will maximalise on its location adjacent the Park Lands and provide a high

level residential accommodation

Car parking and access is acceptable, and utilises rear access and will not create a new

crossover to South Terrace

The proposal is at variance with the Development Plan in the following ways:

The proposal exceeds the height requirements for the City Frame Zone and does not

provide for a transition in scale to the residential zone to the rear

Not all setbacks are achieved, however they are considered to be acceptable

Council has raised concerns with the car park access and operational requirements –

although have not objected to the proposal proceeding

The most significant issue for consideration regarding this proposal relates to the proposed height

of the development, which exceeds that envisaged for the City Frame Zone. However on balance

this is considered acceptable, given that there are unlikely to be any discernible impacts from the

additional height, in light of the high quality of design and context of the locality and that there is

unlikely to be any significant impacts on the residents in the immediate area.

9. RECOMMENDATION

1) RESOLVE that the proposed development is NOT seriously at variance with the policies in

the Development Plan.

2) RESOLVE to grant Development Plan Consent to the proposal by Parkland Vista Pty Ltd, C/-

The Transpac Group Pty Ltd for the demolition of an office building and the construction of a

13 level building, comprising 11 levels of apartments, ground and mezzanine level office

accommodation and a partially covered rooftop terrace at 138, 139 and 139A South

Terrace, Adelaide, subject to the following reserved matter and conditions of consent.

12 June 2014

P22

Reserved Matter:

1. Pursuant to Section 33(3) of the Development Act 1993, the following matter is

reserved for further assessment, to the satisfaction of the Development Assessment

Commission in consultation with the Government Architect, prior to the granting of

Development Approval.

1.1 Further information is required in relation to the final façade design, including a

final materials schedule and typical detail, which meets the design intent, as

agreed to by the Government Architect.

Planning Conditions:

1. Except where minor amendments may be required by other relevant Acts, or by

conditions imposed by this application, the development shall be established in strict

accordance with the details and plans, as submitted in Development Application

020/0010/14A including:

Plans by JPE Design Studio, project no. 02913

Plan No. Revision Date

SK00 September 2013

SK01 September 2013

SK02 A September 2013

SK03 A September 2013

SK04 September 2013

SK05 A September 2013

SK06 B September 2013

SK07 B September 2013

SK08 B September 2013

SK09 A September 2013

SK10 September 2013

Reports / Correspondence

Planning Application by JPE Design Studio, Revision C, dated 3 April 2014

Planning Report by Planning Chambers, ref 13-100DAR01, dated 16 April 2014

Traffic report by Phil Weaver, dated 21 February 2014 and supplementary comments

dated 4 April 2014

Acoustic Report by Resonate, ref A13307RP1, Rev C, dated 17 April 2014

Wind Assessment by Vipac, ref 50B-13-0124-TNT-343412-1, dated 21 February 2014

Waste management advice by Veolia, dated 27 February 2014

2. The strategies recommended in the traffic report by Phil Weaver, dated 21 February

2014 and supplementary comments dated 4 April 2014, forming part of this consent

shall be undertaken within the Development to the reasonable satisfaction of the

Development Assessment Commission. Such measures shall be made operational prior

to the occupation or use of the Development.

3. The acoustic attenuation measures recommended in the Resonate report, ref

A13307RP1, Rev C, dated 17 April 2014, forming part of this consent shall be

undertaken within the Development to the reasonable satisfaction of the Development

Assessment Commission. Such acoustic measures shall be made operational prior to the

occupation or use of the Development and any additional measures implemented as

required when plant and equipment details are finalised.

4. External materials, surface finishes and colours of the Development shall be consistent

with the final details provided and approved by Development Assessment Commission.

12 June 2014

P23

5. Mechanical plant or equipment, shall be designed, sited and screened to minimise noise

impact on adjacent premises or properties. The noise level associated with the

combined operation of plant and equipment such as air conditioning, ventilation and

refrigeration systems when assessed at the nearest existing or envisaged noise

sensitive location in or adjacent to the site shall not exceed:

5.1 50 dB(A) during daytime (7.00am to 10.00pm) and 40 dB(A) during night time

(10.00pm to 7.00am) in or adjacent to a Residential Zone or the Park Lands

Zone when measured and adjusted in accordance with the relevant

environmental noise legislation except where it can be demonstrated that a high

background noise exists.

6. A Construction Environment Management Plan (CEMP) shall be prepared and

implemented in accordance with current industry standards – including the EPA

publication “Environmental Management of On-site Remediation” - to minimise

environmental harm and disturbance during construction.

The management plan must incorporate, without being limited to, the following matters:

6.1 air quality, including odour and dust

6.2 surface water including erosion and sediment control

6.3 soils, including fill importation, stockpile management and prevention of soil

contamination

6.4 groundwater, including prevention of groundwater contamination

6.5 noise

6.6 occupational health and safety

For further information relating to what Site Contamination is, refer to the EPA

Guideline: 'Site Contamination – what is site contamination?':

www.epa.sa.gov.au/pdfs/guide_sc_what.pdf

A copy of the CEMP shall be provided to the Adelaide City Council prior to the

commencement of site works.

7. The final details of the proposed waste management practices to be adopted by the

applicant or the person(s) having the benefit of this consent during the construction of

the Development, shall be submitted to Adelaide City Council prior to the granting of

development approval to the Development. Such details shall include a Waste

Management Plan which shall cover the three phases of the Development, namely:

7.1 resource recovery during demolition

7.2 waste minimisation and resource recovery during construction; and

7.3 resource recovery during occupation or use of the Development including

proposed methods of recycling of all recyclable materials; and

The collection of waste from Stafford Lane shall not occur before 7.00am in-line with the

EPA noise policy to minimise noise disturbance to neighbours.

8. Lighting shall be installed in accordance with Council’s guideline entitled “Under

Verandah/Awning Lighting Guidelines” at all times to the reasonable satisfaction of the

Adelaide City Council and prior to the occupation or use of the Development. Such

lighting shall be operational during the hours of darkness at all times to the reasonable

satisfaction of the Development Assessment Commission.

9. All modifications required to Adelaide City Council’s public lighting and associated

infrastructure shall meet Councils’ requirements and all costs associated with these

works will be borne directly by the developer.

12 June 2014

P24

10. The connection of any storm water discharge from the Land to any part of the Adelaide

City Council’s underground drainage system shall be undertaken in accordance with the

Council Policy entitled ‘Adelaide City Council Storm Water Requirements’ and be to the

reasonable satisfaction of the Adelaide City.

11. The proposed car parking layout shall be designed and constructed to conform to the

Australian Standard 2890.1:2004 for Off-Street Parking Facilities; Australian Standard

2890.6-2009 Parking facilities.

12. The on-site Bicycle Parking facilities shall be designed in accordance with Australian

Standard 2890.3-1993 and the AUSTROADS, Guide to Traffic Engineering Practice Part

14 – Bicycles.

13. Council maintained infrastructure that is removed or damaged during construction

works shall be reinstated to Council specifications. All costs associated with these works

shall be met by the proponent.

14. Prior to the commencement of construction a dilapidation report (i.e. condition survey)

shall be prepared by a qualified engineer to ensure the stability and protection of

adjoining buildings, structures and Council assets. A copy of this report shall be

provided to the Adelaide City Council.

14.1 During construction, all materials and goods shall be loaded and unloaded within

the boundaries of the subject land.

14.2 The development and the site shall be maintained in a serviceable condition and

operated in an orderly and tidy manner at all times.

14.3 All trade waste and other rubbish shall be stored in covered containers prior to

removal and shall be kept screened from public view.

Advisory Notes:

a) The proponent may need to obtain approval under the regulations for any equipment or

cranes to be used on site that will intrude into prescribed airspace before entering into a

commitment to construct any building at the site.

b) The proposal includes the following stages: Stage 1: removal of building and landscape

items and the level and prepare site for new works; and Stage 2: Construction of the

proposed building

c) The approval does not include any signage (other than directional), which would need to

be the subject of a separate application to the relevant planning authority.

d) The applicant is reminded of its general environmental duty, as required by Section 25

of the Environment Protection Act 1993, to take all reasonable and practical measures

to ensure that the activities on the whole site, including during construction, do not

pollute the environment in a way which causes or may cause environmental harm.

e) Any information sheets, guidelines documents, codes of practice, technical bulletins etc.

that are referenced in this response can be accessed on the following web site:

http://www.epa.sa.gov.au/pub.html

f) The applicant must ensure there is no objection from any of the public utilities in

respect of underground or overhead services and any alterations that may be required

are to be at the applicant’s expense.

12 June 2014

P25

g) As work is being undertaken on or near the boundary, the applicant should ensure that

the boundaries are clearly defined, by a Licensed Surveyor, prior to the commencement

of any building work.

h) If temporary hoarding or site works require modification of existing Council

infrastructure, the works will be carried out to meet Councils requirements and costs

borne directly by the developer.

i) All damage to Adelaide City Council’s infrastructure, including damage to public lighting

and underground ducting caused by projects works or loading of site crane onto

pathways will be repaired to meet Councils requirements and the cost of the developer.

j) A Building Site Management Plan is required prior to construction work beginning on

site. The Building Site Management Plan should include details of such items as:

Work in the Public Realm

Street Occupation

Hoarding

Site Amenities

Traffic Requirements

Servicing Site

Adjoining Buildings

Reinstatement of Infrastructure

k) Insecure building sites have been identified as a soft target for vandalism and theft of

general building materials. The Adelaide Local Service Area Police and the Adelaide City

Council are working together to help improve security at building sites. Items most

commonly stolen or damaged are tools, water heaters and white goods. To minimise

the risk of theft and damage, consider co-ordinating the delivery and installation of the

goods on the same day. Work with your builder to secure the site with a fence and

lockable gate. Securing the site is essential to prevent unauthorised vehicle access and

establishes clear ownership. If you have any further enquiries about ways to reduce

building site theft, please do not hesitate to contact the Adelaide Local Service Area

Community Programs Section on 8463 7024. Alternatively, you can contact Adelaide

City Council for further assistance and information by calling Nick Nash on 8203 7562.

l) Pursuant to Regulation 74, the Council must be given one business day's notice of the

commencement and the completion of each stage of the building work on the site. To

notify Council, contact City Services on 8203 7332.

m) The emission of noise from the premises is subject to control under the Environment

Protection Act and Regulations, 1993 and the applicant (or person with the benefit of

this consent) should comply with those requirements.

n) The development must be substantially commenced within three (3) years of the date of

this Notification, unless this period has been extended by the Development Assessment

Commission.

o) You are also advised that any act or work authorised or required by this Notification

must be completed within five (5) years of the date of the Notification unless this period

is extended by the Commission.

p) You will require a fresh consent before commencing or continuing the development if

you are unable to satisfy these requirements.

12 June 2014

P26

q) You have a right of appeal against the conditions which have been imposed on this

Development Plan Consent or Development Approval. Such an appeal must be lodged at

the Environment, Resources and Development Court within two months of the day on

which you receive this notice or such longer time as the Court may allow. Please contact

the Court if you wish to appeal. The Court is located in the Sir Samuel Way Building,

Victoria Square, Adelaide, (telephone number 8204 0300).

………………………………………………….

Gabrielle McMahon

CHIEF PROJECT OFFICER

STATUTORY PLANNING BRANCH

PLANNING DIVISION (DPTI)

12 June 2014

P27

RELEVANT DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROVISIONS

The Objectives and Principles of Development Control in the Development Plan most relevant to

the assessment of the application are outlined as follows. These are contained in the Adelaide

(City) Development Plan (Consolidated 30 January 2014).

CITY FRAME ZONE

Desired Character

This Zone will primarily contain medium to high scale residential development supported by a mix

of shops, personal services, restaurants, cafés, and community and hospitality uses.

The mix of complementary land uses will extend activity into the evening to enhance the vibrancy

and safety of the area, particularly the adjacent Park Lands and Whitmore and Hurtle Squares,

which offer a high level of amenity. Small-scale licensed entertainment premises, nightclubs or

bars may occur in limited numbers where they are designed and sited to maintain day and

evening activation at street level. Development will include residential and mixed use residential

buildings that are well connected to nearby public transport networks, including the tramline.

The location and scale of buildings will achieve high quality urban design outcomes, with the

highest built form located along South Terrace facing the Park Lands with a slightly lower built

form framing the Squares. Development on key corner sites at the entrances to the City grid and

Squares will create landmark buildings that provide a strong built form edge and pedestrian scale

detailing to both street frontages.

Buildings will have minimal or no setback and provide tall walls when viewed from the main road

frontage to achieve a consistent built form façade. Landscaping and small variations in front

setback will assist in softening the continuous edge of new built form and provide a higher

amenity streetscape and pedestrian environment which is shaded by street trees and other

mature vegetation.

Buildings will have a strong horizontal emphasis with clearly defined and segmented vertical

elements. At street level, the use of solid materials will be appropriately balanced with glazed

areas to provide visual interest and activity. Tall façades will be well articulated with finer details

that contribute positively to the public realm, including modelled façades, canopies, fenestration

and balconies that make use of light and shade. An interesting pedestrian environment and

human scale at ground level which integrates well with the Park Lands and Squares will be

created.

Catalyst sites provide opportunities for integrated developments on large sites to assist in the

transformation of a locality. Such developments will facilitate growth in the residential population

of the City, while also activating the public realm and creating a vibrant main street feel. A range

of land uses will be provided that add to the range of local employment opportunities and the

availability of services and shopping facilities within the main street.

Development on catalyst sites will exemplify quality and contemporary design that is generally

greater in height, or intensity, than its surroundings. However, development will be designed to

carefully manage the interface with sensitive uses in Residential Zones, particularly with regard to

massing; proportions; overshadowing; traffic and noise related impacts.

Objective 1: Development that contains a mix of uses including shops, offices and commercial

development at lower floors with residential land uses above with views to the Park

Lands and Squares.

Objective 2: Development that creates a strong edge to the Park Lands and Squares.

Objective 3: A uniform streetscape established through a largely consistent front setback and

tall, articulated building façades.

12 June 2014

P28

Objective 4: Development that creates a high quality public realm that promotes walking,

cycling, public transport patronage and social interaction.

Objective 5: An area that allows people to work, shop and access a range of services close to

home.

Objective 6: Adaptable and flexible building designs that can accommodate changes in use and

respond to changing economic and social conditions.

Objective 7: A built form that provides a transition down in scale and intensity at the Zone’s

boundaries to maintain the amenity of properties located within adjoining

Residential Zones.

Objective 8: Development that contributes to the Desired Character of the Zone.

Land Use

1 The following types of development, or combinations thereof, are envisaged in the Zone:

Affordable housing

Aged persons

accommodation

Community centre

Consulting room

Dwelling

Educational

establishment

Hotel

Indoor recreation centre

Licensed entertainment

premises

Office

Pre-school

Primary school

Residential flat building

Restaurant

Retirement village

Shop or group of shops

Supported

accommodation

Tourist accommodation.

2 Development should comprise wholly residential buildings or mixed use buildings with non-

residential development at the ground/first floor level and residences above.

3 Development should reinforce the area as predominantly residential, with non-residential

land uses comprising no more than 40 percent of any new building.

4 Non-residential development should occur as part of a mixed use building and comprise

uses that:

(a) are of a role and function appropriate for the Zone;

(b) encourage walking and cycling to local shopping, community services and other

activities; and

(c) do not detrimentally impact on the amenity of nearby residents.

5 Licensed entertainment premises, nightclubs or bars should be small in scale, secondary to

the primary land use mix in each street and not detract from the street’s daytime

activation.

6 Development listed as non-complying is generally inappropriate.

Form and Character

7 Development should be consistent with the Desired Character for the Zone.

Design and Appearance

8 The finished ground floor level of buildings should be at grade and/or level with the

footpath to provide direct pedestrian access and street-level activation.

9 Pedestrian shelter and shade should be provided over footpaths through the use of

continuous structures such as awnings, canopies and verandahs.

12 June 2014

P29

10 The ground floors of buildings should have a minimum floor to ceiling height of 3.5 metres

to allow for adaptation to a range of land uses including shops, cafés, restaurants or

offices without the need for significant alterations to the building.

11 A minimum of 70 percent of the ground floor primary frontage of buildings should be

visually permeable, transparent or clear glazed to help create active street frontages and

maximise passive surveillance.

12 Buildings on sites with a frontage greater than 10 metres should be articulated through

variations in forms, materials, openings and colours.

.

13 Buildings should be designed to overlook or be orientated towards the Park Lands and

Squares and pedestrian and cycle routes.

Building Height

14 Except where the airport’s operations require a lesser height or the development is located

on a site greater than 1500 square metres (which may include one or more allotment),

building height should not exceed:

(a) 36 metres south of Gilles and Gilbert streets; and

(b) 29 metres north of Gilles and Gilbert streets.

15 Development should have the following minimum building height to provide optimal height

and floor space yields that activate and frame the Park Lands and Squares:

(a) 4 storeys or more south of Gilles and Gilbert streets;

(b) 3 storeys or more north of Gilles and Gilbert streets.

Setbacks

16 Buildings (excluding verandahs, porticos and the like) should generally be built to the

primary road frontage.

17 There is no minimum setback required from a rear access way where the access way is

wider than 6.5 metres. Where the access way is less than 6.5 metres in width, a setback

distance equal to the additional width required to make the access way 6.5 metres or

more, is required to provide adequate manoeuvrability for vehicles.

Car Parking

24 Car parking should be provided in accordance with Table Adel/7 and be ancillary to an

approved or existing use.

Table Adel/7 On Site car parking provisions

Capital City, Main Street, City Frame and 15 Institutional (St Andrew’s) Zone

Type of development Minimum Provision of Car Park Spaces In the City Frame and Main Street Zones:

Maximum Provision of Car Park Spaces In the City Frame and Main Street Zones:

Low Scale and Medium to high scale residential

N/A

N/A

Office Accommodation 3 spaces for every 100 square metres

5 spaces for every for every 100 square metres

PROCEDURAL MATTERS

Public Notification

28 Categories of public notification are prescribed in Schedule 9 of the Development

Regulations 2008.

In addition, the following forms of development, or any combination thereof (except where

the development is non-complying) are assigned:

12 June 2014

P30

(a) Category 1, public notification not required:

Advertisement

Aged persons accommodation

All forms of development that are ancillary and in association with residential development

Consulting room

Community centre

Dwelling

Educational establishment

Office in association with residential development

Pre-school

Primary school

Restaurant

Residential flat building

Retirement village

Shop or group of shops

Supported accommodation

Tourist accommodation

(b) Category 2, public notification required. Third parties do not have any appeal rights:

(i) All forms of development not assigned Category 1.

(ii) Any form of development assigned Category 1 where the site of the

development is adjacent land to land in a Residential Zone and it exceeds 22

metres in building height.

(iii) Any development on a catalyst site (a site greater than 1500 square metres, which

may include one or more allotment) that exceeds 36 metres in building height south of

Gilles and Gilbert streets, or 29 metres in building height north of Gilles and Gilbert

streets.

COUNCIL WIDE

Living Culture

Objective 1: The City of Adelaide as the prime meeting place and cultural focus for the people of

metropolitan Adelaide and the State.

Objective 2: The City of Adelaide as a major focus for tourism, conventions, leisure,

entertainment, sport and recreation, education, cultural development and the arts.

Objective 3: Development that enhances the public environment and provides interest at street

level.

1 Development should, where appropriate, integrate public art into the design of new or

refurbished building sites in a manner which is integrated with and commensurate in scale

with, the new or refurbished buildings. For the purpose of enhancing the public

environment, public art should:

(a) demonstrate artistic excellence and innovation in design;

(b) be made of high quality materials;

(c) enhance the setting of new development;

(d) be integrated into the design of the building and the surrounding environment;

(e) consider any existing public art works; and

(f) not hinder sight lines or create entrapment spots.

12 June 2014

P31

City Living

Housing Choice

Objective 6: A variety of housing options which supplement existing types of housing and suit

the widely differing social, cultural and economic needs of all existing and future

residents.

Objective 7: A range of long and short term residential opportunities to increase the number and

range of dwellings available whilst protecting identified areas of special character

and improving the quality of the residential environment.

Objective 8: A broad range of accommodation to meet the needs of low income, disadvantaged

and groups with complex needs whilst ensuring integration with existing residential

communities.

5 Development should comprise of a range of housing types, tenures and cost, to meet the

widely differing social and economic needs of residents.

6 Development should provide a variety of accommodation to meet the needs of low income

people, student housing, social housing, housing for single people, large and small

families, people with disabilities and people with other complex needs. These forms of

housing should be distributed throughout the Council area to avoid over-concentration of

similar types of housing in a particular area and should be of a scale and appearance that

reinforces and achieves the desired character of the locality, as expressed in the relevant

Zone and Policy Area.

7 Residential development should be designed to be adaptable to meet people’s needs

throughout their lifespan to ensure that changes associated with old age, special access

and mobility can be accommodated.

Medium to High Scale Residential/Serviced Apartment

Objective 22: Medium to high scale residential (including student accommodation) or serviced

apartment development that:

(a) has a high standard of amenity and environmental performance;

(b) comprises functional internal layouts;

(c) is adaptable to meet a variety of accommodation and living needs; and

(d) includes well-designed and functional recreation and storage areas.

Building Entrances

49 Entrances to medium to high scale residential or serviced apartment development should:

(a) be oriented towards the street;

(b) be visible and easily identifiable from the street; and

(c) provide shelter, a sense of personal address and transitional space around the entry.

50 Entrances to individual dwellings or apartments within medium to high scale residential or

serviced apartment development should:

(a) be located as close as practical to the lift and/or lobby access and minimise the need

for long access corridors;

(b) be clearly identifiable; and

(c) avoid the creation of potential areas for entrapment.

Daylight, Sunlight and Ventilation

51 Medium to high scale residential or serviced apartment development should be designed to

maximise opportunities to facilitate natural ventilation and capitalise on natural daylight

and minimise the need for artificial lighting during daylight hours.

12 June 2014

P32

52 Medium to high scale residential or serviced apartment development should be designed

and located to maximise solar access to dwellings and communal open space on the

northern facade.

53 Ceiling heights that promote the use of taller windows, highlight windows, fan lights and

light shelves should be utilised to facilitate access to natural light, improve daylight

distribution and enhance air circulation, particularly in dwellings with limited light access

and deep interiors.

54 All new medium to high scale residential or serviced apartment development should have

direct ventilation and natural light.

55 The maximum distance of a habitable room such as a living, dining, bedroom or kitchen

from a window providing natural light and ventilation to that room is 8 metres.

56 Light wells should not be used as the primary source of daylight for living rooms to ensure

a sufficient level of outlook and daylight.

57 Medium to high scale residential or serviced apartment development should be designed to

ensure living areas, private open space or communal open space, where such communal

open space provides the primary area of private open space, are the main recipients of

sunlight.

58 Medium to high scale residential or serviced apartment development should locate living

areas, private open space and communal open space, where such communal open space

provides the primary area of private open space, where they will receive sunlight and,

where possible, should maintain at least two hours of direct sunlight solar time on 22 June

to:

(a) at least one habitable room window (excluding bathroom, toilet, laundry or storage

room windows);

(b) to at least 20 percent of the private open space; and

(c) communal open space, where such communal open space provides the primary private

open space for any adjacent residential development.

59 Natural cross ventilation of habitable rooms should be achieved by the following methods:

(a) positioning window and door openings in different directions to encourage cross

ventilation from cooling summer breezes;

(b) installing small low level windows on the windward side and larger raised openings on

the leeward side to maximise airspeed in the room;

(c) installing higher level casement or sash windows, clerestory windows or operable

fanlight windows to facilitate convective currents;

(d) selecting windows which the occupants can reconfigure to funnel breezes such as

vertical louvred, casement windows and externally opening doors;

(e) ensuring the internal layout minimises interruptions to airflow;

(f) limiting building depth to allow for ease of cross ventilation; and/or

(g) draught proofing doors, windows and other openings.

Private Open Space

60 Medium to high scale residential development and serviced apartments should provide the

following private open space:

(a) studio (where there is no separate bedroom): no minimum requirement but some

provision is desirable.

(b) 1 bedroom dwelling/apartment: 8 square metres.

(c) 2 bedroom dwelling/apartment: 11 square metres.

(d) 3+ bedroom dwelling/apartment: 15 square metres.

12 June 2014

P33

A lesser amount of private open space may be considered appropriate in circumstances

where the equivalent amount of open space is provided in a communal open space

accessible to all occupants of the development.

Private open space for 2 or more bedroom dwellings/apartments may be divided into

different areas whilst private open space for studios or 1 bedroom dwelling/apartments

should be in a single area.

Areas used for parking of motor vehicles are not included as private open space.

Note: In Residential, Main Street and Institutional Zones, specific landscaped open space and private landscaped open space provisions apply.

61 Medium to high scale residential (other than student accommodation) or serviced

apartment development in the Capital City Zone should ensure direct access from living

areas to private open space areas, which may take the form of balconies, terraces, decks

or other elevated outdoor areas provided the amenity and visual privacy of adjacent

properties is protected.

62 Other than for student accommodation, private open space should have a minimum

dimension of 2 metres and should be well proportioned to be functional and promote

indoor/outdoor living.

63 Balconies should be integrated into the overall architectural form and detail of the

development and should:

(a) utilise sun screens, pergolas, shutters and openable walls to control sunlight and wind;

(b) be cantilevered, partially cantilevered and/or recessed in response to daylight, wind,

acoustic and visual privacy;

(c) be of a depth that ensures sunlight can enter the dwelling below; and

(d) allow views and casual surveillance of the street while providing for safety and visual

privacy.

64 Secondary balconies, including Juliet balconies or operable walls with balustrades should

be considered, subject to overlooking and privacy, for additional amenity and choice.

65 For clothes drying, balconies off laundries or bathrooms and roof top areas should be

screened from public view.

66 The incorporation of roof top gardens is encouraged providing it does not result in

unreasonable overlooking or loss of privacy.

Visual Privacy

67 Medium to high scale residential or serviced apartment development should be designed

and sited to minimise the potential overlooking of habitable rooms such as bedrooms and

living areas of adjacent development.

68 A habitable room window, balcony, roof garden, terrace or deck should be set-back from

boundaries with adjacent sites at least three metres to provide an adequate level of

amenity and privacy and to not restrict the reasonable development of adjacent sites.

Noise and Internal Layout

69 Medium to high scale residential or serviced apartment development close to high noise

sources (e.g. major roads, established places of entertainment and centres of activity)

should be designed to locate noise sensitive rooms and private open space away from

noise sources, or be protected by appropriate shielding techniques.

12 June 2014

P34

70 Attached or abutting dwellings/apartments should be designed to minimise the

transmission of sound between dwellings and, in particular, to protect bedrooms from

possible noise intrusions.

Minimum Unit Sizes

71 Medium to high scale residential or serviced apartment development should provide a high

quality living environment by ensuring the following minimum internal floor areas:

(a) studio (where there is no separate bedroom): 35 square metres.

(b) 1 bedroom dwelling/apartment: 50 square metres

(c) 2 bedroom dwelling/apartment: 65 square metres

(d) 3+ bedroom dwelling/apartment: 80 square metres plus an additional 15 square

metres for every additional bedroom over 3 bedrooms.

Note: Dwelling/apartment “unit size” includes internal storage areas but does not include balconies or car parking as part of the calculation.

72 Internal structural columns should correspond with the position of internal walls to ensure

that the space within the dwelling/apartment is useable.

Adaptability

73 Within medium to high scale residential or serviced apartment development,

dwelling/apartment layouts should be adaptable to accommodate:

(a) a range of activities and privacy levels between different spaces;

(b) flexible room sizes and proportions;

(c) efficient circulation to optimise the functionality of floor space within rooms; and

(d) the future reuse of student accommodation as residential apartments through a design

and layout that allows individual apartments to be reconfigured into a larger dwelling

or other alternative use.

Outlook

74 All medium to high scale residential or serviced apartment development should be

designed to ensure the living rooms have a satisfactory external outlook. Living rooms that

do not have an outlook or the only source of outlook is through high level windows or a

skylight are not considered to provide an appropriate level of amenity for the occupiers.

Note: Outlook is a short range prospect and is distinct from a view which is more extensive and long range to particular objects or geographic features.

75 Light wells may be used as a source of daylight, ventilation, outlook and sunlight for

medium to high scale residential or serviced apartment development provided that:

(a) living rooms do not have lightwells as their only source of outlook;

(b) lightwells up to 18 metres in height have a minimum horizontal dimension of 3 metres

or 6 metres if overlooked by bedrooms; and

(c) lightwells higher than 18 metres in height have a minimum horizontal dimension of 6

metres or 9 metres if overlooked by bedrooms.

On-Site Parking and Fencing

Objective 23: Safe and convenient on-site car parking for resident and visitor vehicles.

76 To ensure an adequate provision of on-site parking, car parking should be provided for

medium to high scale residential (other than student accommodation) or serviced

apartment development in accordance with Table Adel/7.

77 Garages and parking structures associated with medium to high scale residential or

serviced apartment development should be located so that they do not visually dominate

the street frontage.

78 Car parking areas should be designed and located to:

12 June 2014

P35

(a) be close and convenient to dwellings/apartments;

(b) be lit at night;

(c) be well ventilated if enclosed;

(d) avoid headlight glare into windows; and

(e) clearly define visitor parking.

79 Where garages are located within a basement or undercroft:

(a) the width of access driveways should be kept to a minimum and should not detract

from the streetscape;

(b) driveways should be designed to ensure safe and convenient access and egress;

(c) access should be restricted to one driveway or one point of access and egress;

(d) vehicles should be able to safely exit in a forward direction and should not compromise

pedestrian safety or cause conflict with other vehicles; and

(e) the height of the car park ceiling should not exceed one metre above the finished

ground floor level to ensure minimal impact on the streetscape.

80 Fencing and walls should:

(a) be articulated and detailed to provide visual interest;

(b) assist the development to address the street;

(c) assist in the provision of safety and surveillance;

(d) assist in highlighting entrances; and

(e) enable visibility of buildings from and to the street.

Storage Areas

81 Site facilities should be readily accessible to each dwelling/serviced apartment,

complement the development and relevant desired character and should include:

(a) a common mail box structure located close to the main pedestrian entrance;

(b) areas for the storage and collection of goods, materials, refuse and waste including

facilities to enable the separation of recyclable materials as appropriate to the size and

nature of the development and screened from public view; and

(c) external clothes drying areas for residential dwellings that do not incorporate ground

level open space.

82 Medium to high scale residential (other than student accommodation) or serviced

apartment development should provide adequate and accessible storage facilities for the

occupants at the following minimum rates:

(a) studio: 6 cubic metres

(b) 1 bedroom dwelling/apartment: 8 cubic metres

(c) 2 bedroom dwelling/apartment: 10 cubic metres

(d) 3+ bedroom dwelling/apartment: 12 cubic metres

50 percent of the storage space should be provided within the dwelling/apartment with the

remainder provided in the basement or other communal areas.

Environmental

Crime Prevention Through Urban Design

Objective 24: A safe and secure, crime resistant environment that:

(a) ensures that land uses are integrated and designed to facilitate natural

surveillance;

(b) promotes building and site security; and

(c) promotes visibility through the incorporation of clear lines of sight and

appropriate lighting.

83 Development should promote the safety and security of the community in the public realm

and within development. Development should:

(a) promote natural surveillance of the public realm, including open space, car parks,

pedestrian routes, service lanes, public transport stops and residential areas, through

12 June 2014

P36

the design and location of physical features, electrical and mechanical devices,

activities and people to maximise visibility by:

(i) orientating windows, doors and building entrances towards the street, open

spaces, car parks, pedestrian routes and public transport stops;

(ii) avoiding high walls, blank facades, carports and landscaping that obscures direct

views to public areas

(iii) arranging living areas, windows, pedestrian paths and balconies to overlook

recreation areas, entrances and car parks;

(iv) positioning recreational and public space areas so they are bound by roads on at

least two road frontages or overlooked by development;

(v) creating a complementary mix of day and night-time activities, such as

residential, commercial, recreational and community uses, that extend the

duration and level of intensity of public activity;

(vi) locating public toilets, telephones and other public facilities with direct access and

good visibility from well-trafficked public spaces;

(vii) ensuring that rear service areas and access lanes are either secured or exposed

to surveillance; and

(viii) ensuring the surveillance of isolated locations through the use of audio monitors,

emergency telephones or alarms, video cameras or staff eg by surveillance of lift

and toilet areas within car parks.

(b) provide access control by facilitating communication, escape and path finding within

development through legible design by:

(i) incorporating clear directional devices;

(ii) avoiding opportunities for concealment near well travelled routes;

(iii) closing off or locking areas during off-peak hours, such as stairwells, to

concentrate access/exit points to a particular route;

(iv) use of devices such as stainless steel mirrors where a passage has a bend;

(v) locating main entrances and exits at the front of a site and in view of a street;

(vi) providing open space and pedestrian routes which are clearly defined and have

clear and direct sightlines for the users; and

(vii) locating elevators and stairwells where they can be viewed by a maximum

number of people, near the edge of buildings where there is a glass wall at the

entrance.

(c) promote territoriality or sense of ownership through physical features that express

ownership and control over the environment and provide a clear delineation of public

and private space by:

(i) clear delineation of boundaries marking public, private and semi-private space,

such as by paving, lighting, walls and planting;

(ii) dividing large development sites into territorial zones to create a sense of

ownership of common space by smaller groups of dwellings; and

(iii) locating main entrances and exits at the front of a site and in view of a street.

(d) provide awareness through design of what is around and what is ahead so that

legitimate users and observers can make an accurate assessment of the safety of a

locality and site and plan their behaviour accordingly by:

(i) avoiding blind sharp corners, pillars, tall solid fences and a sudden change in grade

of pathways, stairs or corridors so that movement can be predicted;

(ii) using devices such as convex security mirrors or reflective surfaces where lines of

sight are impeded;

(iii) ensuring barriers along pathways such as landscaping, fencing and walls are

permeable;

(iv) planting shrubs that have a mature height less than one metre and trees with a

canopy that begins at two metres;

(v) adequate and consistent lighting of open spaces, building entrances, parking and

pedestrian areas to avoid the creation of shadowed areas; and

(vi) use of robust and durable design features to discourage vandalism.

12 June 2014

P37

84 Residential development should be designed to overlook streets, public and communal

open space to allow casual surveillance.

85 To maximise security and safety, buildings should be designed to minimise access between

roofs, balconies and windows of adjacent buildings.

86 Security features should be incorporated within the design of shop fronts to complement

the design of the frontage and allow window shopping out of hours. If security grilles are

provided, these should:

(a) be transparent and illuminated to complement the appearance of the frontage;

(b) provide for window shopping; and

(c) allow for the spill of light from the shop front onto the street.

Solid shutters with less than 75 percent permeability are not acceptable.

Noise Emissions

Objective 26: Development that does not unreasonably interfere with the desired character of

the locality by generating unduly annoying or disturbing noise.

Objective 27: Noise sensitive development designed to protect its occupants from existing

noise sources and from noise sources contemplated within the relevant Zone or

Policy Area and that does not unreasonably interfere with the operation of non-

residential uses contemplated within the relevant Zone or Policy Area.

Noise Sources

90 Development with potential to emit significant noise (including licensed entertainment

premises and licensed premises) should incorporate appropriate noise attenuation

measures in to their design to prevent noise from causing unreasonable interference with

the amenity and desired character of the locality, as contemplated in the relevant Zone

and Policy Area.

92 Development of licensed premises or licensed entertainment premises or similar in the

Capital City, Main Street and City Frame Zones should include noise attenuation measures

to achieve the following when assessed at:

(a) the nearest existing noise sensitive location in or adjacent to that Zone:

(i) music noise (L10, 15 min) less than 8 dB above the level of background noise

(L90,15 min) in any octave band of the sound spectrum; and (ii) music noise (LA10, 15

min) less than 5 dB(A) above the level of background noise (LA90,15 min) for the

overall (sum of all octave bands) A-weighted levels; or

(b) the nearest envisaged future noise sensitive location in or adjacent to that Zone:

(i) music noise (L10, 15 min) less than 8dB above the level of background noise

(L90,15 min) in any octave band of the sound spectrum and music noise (L10, 15

min) less than 5dB(A) above the level of background noise (LA90,15 min) for the

overall (sum of all octave bands) A-weighted levels; or

(ii) music noise (L10, 15 min) less than 60dB(Lin) in any octave band of the sound

spectrum and the overall (LA10,15 min) noise level is less than 55 dB(A).

93 Speakers should not be placed on the fascias of premises or on the pavement adjacent to

the premises to ensure development does not diminish the enjoyment of other land in the

locality.

94 Mechanical plant or equipment, should be designed, sited and screened to minimise noise

impact on adjacent premises or properties. The noise level associated with the combined

operation of plant and equipment such as air conditioning, ventilation and refrigeration

systems when assessed at the nearest existing or envisaged noise sensitive location in or

adjacent to the site should not exceed:

12 June 2014

P38

(a) 55 dB(A) during daytime (7.00am to 10.00pm) and 45 dB(A) during night time

(10.00pm to 7.00am) when measured and adjusted in accordance with the relevant

environmental noise legislation except where it can be demonstrated that a high

background noise exists.

(b) 50 dB(A) during daytime (7.00am to 10.00pm) and 40 dB(A) during night time

(10.00pm to 7.00am) in or adjacent to a Residential Zone, the North Adelaide Historic

(Conservation) Zone or the Park Lands Zone when measured and adjusted in

accordance with the relevant environmental noise legislation except where it can be

demonstrated that a high background noise exists.

95 To ensure minimal disturbance to residents:

(a) ancillary activities such as deliveries, collection, movement of private waste bins,

goods, empty bottles and the like should not occur:

(i) after 10.00pm; and

(ii) before 7.00am Monday to Saturday or before 9.00am on a Sunday or Public

Holiday.

(b) typical activity within any car park area including vehicles being started, doors closing

and vehicles moving away from the premises should not result in sleep disturbance

when proposed for use after 10.00pm as defined by the limits recommended by the

World Health Organisation.

Noise Receivers

96 Noise sensitive development should incorporate adequate noise attenuation measures into

their design and construction to provide occupants with reasonable amenity when exposed

to noise sources such as major transport corridors (road, rail, tram and aircraft),

commercial centres, entertainment premises and the like, and from activities and land

uses contemplated in the relevant Zone and Policy Area provisions.

97 Noise sensitive development in mixed use areas should not unreasonably interfere with the

operation of surrounding non-residential uses that generate noise levels that are

commensurate with the envisaged amenity of the locality.

98 Noise sensitive development adjacent to noise sources should include noise attenuation

measures to achieve the following:

(a) satisfaction of the sleep disturbance criteria in the bedrooms or sleeping areas of the

development as defined by the limits recommended by the World Health Organisation;

(b) the maximum satisfactory levels in any habitable room for development near major

roads, as provided in the Australian/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 2107:2000 -

‘Acoustics - Recommended Design Sound Levels and Reverberation Times for Building

Interiors’; and

(c) noise level in any bedroom, when exposed to music noise (L10) from existing

entertainment premises, being:

(i) less than 8 dB above the level of background noise (L90,15 min) in any octave band

of the sound spectrum; and

(ii) less than 5 dB(A) above the level of background noise (LA90,15 min) for the overall

(sum of all octave bands) A-weighted levels.

Background noise within the habitable room can be taken to be that expected in a typical

residential/apartment development of the type proposed, that is inclusive of internal noise

sources such as air conditioning systems, refrigerators and the like as deemed

appropriate.

Unless otherwise demonstrated, the minimum background noise to be used will be:

Octave Band Centre Frequency(Hz) Minimum Background Noise Level (LA90, 15) dB (A)

63 10 125 12 250 14 500 14

12 June 2014

P39

1000 12

2000 10 4000 8 Overall Sum 21

on the basis of the windows being closed for the noise sensitive development and any

existing entertainment premises complying with the relevant legislation relating to noise

emission

99 Attached dwellings/serviced apartments should be designed to minimise the transmission

of sound between dwellings/serviced apartments and should particularly protect bedrooms

from possible noise intrusion.

100 The number of dwellings/serviced apartments within a development sharing a common

entry should be minimised to limit noise generation in internal access ways.

101 Development on land affected by aircraft noise exceeding 20 ANEF, as shown on Map/1

(Overlay 6), should be designed, constructed and insulated to minimise the impact of

aircraft noise by being built in accordance with the Australian Standard AS2021-2000:

‘Acoustics - Aircraft Noise Intrusion - Building Siting and Construction’.

Waste Management

Objective 28: Development which supports high local environmental quality, promotes waste

minimisation, re-use and recycling, encourages waste water, grey water and

stormwater re-use and does not generate unacceptable levels of air, liquid or

solid pollution.

102 A dedicated area for on-site collection and sorting of recyclable materials and refuse

should be provided within all new development.

103 A dedicated area for the collection and sorting of construction waste and the recycling of

building materials during construction as appropriate to the size and nature of the

development should be provided and screened from public view.

104 Development greater than 2 000 square metres of total floor area should manage waste

by:

(a) containing a dedicated area for the collection and sorting of construction waste and

recyclable building materials;

(b) on-site storage and management of waste;

(c) disposal of non-recyclable waste; and

(d) incorporating waste water and stormwater re-use including the treatment and re-use

of grey water.

105 Development should not result in emission of atmospheric, liquid or other pollutants, or

cause unacceptable levels of smell and odour which would detrimentally affect the amenity

of adjacent properties or its locality. Land uses such as restaurants, shops, cafés or other

uses that generate smell and odour should:

(a) ensure extraction flues, ventilation and plant equipment are located in appropriate

locations that will not detrimentally affect the amenity of adjacent occupiers in terms of

noise, odours and the appearance of the equipment;

(b) ensure ventilation and extraction equipment and ducting have the capacity to clean

and filter the air before being released into the atmosphere; and

(c) ensure the size of the ventilation and extraction equipment is suitable and has the

capacity to adequately cater for the demand generated by the potential number of

patrons.

Contaminated Sites

Objective 29: A safe and healthy living and working environment.

12 June 2014

P40

106 Where there is evidence of, or reasonable suspicion that land, buildings and/or water,

including underground water, may have been contaminated, or there is evidence of past

potentially contaminating activity/ies, development should only occur where it is

demonstrated that the land, buildings and/or water can be made suitable for its intended

use prior to commencement of that use.

Note: Information of the suitability of land for the proposed land use should be provided as part of the development application and should include:

(a) the provision of a report of the land use history and condition of the site; (b) where the report reveals that contamination is suspected or identified, a detailed site assessment report that determines whether site contamination poses an actual or potential risk to human health and the environment, either on or off the site, of sufficient magnitude to warrant remediation appropriate to the proposed land use; (c) where remediation is warranted, a remediation and/or management strategy prepared in consultation with an independent Environmental Auditor, Contaminated Land, endorsed by the EPA; (d) a site audit report, prepared by an independent Environmental Auditor, Contaminated Land, endorsed by the EPA, that states that in the opinion of the Auditor, the site is suitable for the intended uses(s), or for certain stated uses(s) and also states any conditions pertaining to the use(s).

Energy Efficiency

Objective 30: Development which is compatible with the long term sustainability of the

environment, minimises consumption of non-renewable resources and utilises

alternative energy generation systems.

All Development

107 Buildings should provide adequate thermal comfort for occupants and minimise the need

for energy use for heating, cooling and lighting by:

(a) providing an internal day living area with a north-facing window, other than for minor

additions*, by:

(i) arranging and concentrating main activity areas of a building to the north for solar

penetration; and

(ii) placing buildings on east-west allotments against or close to the southern boundary

to maximise northern solar access and separation to other buildings to the north.

(b) efficient layout, such as zoning house layout to enable main living areas to be

separately heated and cooled, other than for minor additions;

(c) locating, sizing and shading windows to reduce summer heat loads and permit entry of

winter sun;

(d) allowing for natural cross ventilation to enable cooling breezes to reduce internal

temperatures in summer;

(e) including thermal insulation of roof, walls, floors and ceilings and by draught proofing

doors, windows and openings;

(f) ensuring light colours are applied to external surfaces that receive a high degree of sun

exposure, but not to an extent that will cause glare which produces discomfort or

danger to pedestrians, occupants of adjacent buildings and users of vehicles;

(g) providing an external clothes line for residential development; and

(h) use of landscaping.

108 All development should be designed to promote naturally ventilated and day lit buildings to

minimise the need for mechanical ventilation and lighting systems.

109 Energy reductions should, where possible, be achieved by the following:

(a) appropriate orientation of the building by:

(i) maximising north/south facing facades;

(ii) designing and locating the building so the north facade receives good direct solar

radiation;

(iii) minimising east/west facades to protect the building from summer sun and winter

winds;

(iv) narrow floor plates to maximise the amount of floor area receiving good daylight;

and/or

(v) minimising the ratio of wall surface to floor area.

(b) window orientation and shading;

12 June 2014

P41

(c) adequate thermal mass including night time purging to cool thermal mass;

(d) appropriate insulation by:

(i) insulating windows, walls, floors and roofs; and

(ii) sealing of external openings to minimise infiltration.

(e) maximising natural ventilation including the provision of openable windows;

(f) appropriate selection of materials, colours and finishes; and

(g) introduction of efficient energy use technologies such as geo-exchange and embedded,

distributed energy generation systems such as cogeneration*, wind power, fuel cells

and solar photovoltaic panels that supplement the energy needs of the building and in

some cases, export surplus energy to the electricity grid.

110 Orientation and pitch of the roof should facilitate the efficient use of solar collectors and

photovoltaic cells

111 Buildings, where practical, should be refurbished, adapted and reused to ensure an

efficient use of resources.

112 New buildings should be readily adaptable to future alternative uses.

113 Selection of internal materials for all buildings should be made with regard to internal air

quality and ensure low toxic emissions, particularly with respect to paint and joinery

products.

Residential Development

114 New residential development and residential extensions should be designed to minimise

energy consumption and limit greenhouse gas emissions.

115 Development is encouraged to avoid heat loss by incorporating treatments, such as double

glazing of windows along the southern elevation, or by minimizing the extent of windows

facing south.

Office Development

116 The following principles of sustainable design and construction are required for new office

development, and additions and refurbishments to existing office development, to

minimise energy consumption and limit greenhouse gas emissions:

(a) passive solar consideration in the design, planning and placement of buildings;

(b) re-using and/or improving existing structures or buildings;

(c) designing for the life-cycle of the development to allow for future adaptation;

(d) considering low levels of embodied energy in the selection and use of materials;

(e) developing energy efficiency solutions including passive designs using natural light,

solar control, air movement and thermal mass. Systems should be zoned to minimise

use of energy;

(f) using low carbon and renewable energy sources, such as Combined Heat and Power

(CHP) systems and photovoltaics; and

(g) preserving and enhancing local biodiversity, such as by incorporating roof top gardens.

Micro-climate and Sunlight

Objective 33: Buildings which are designed and sited to be energy efficient and to minimise

micro-climatic and solar access impacts on land or other buildings.

Objective 34: Protection from rain, wind and sun without causing detriment to heritage places,

street trees or the integrity of the streetscape.

120 Development should be designed and sited to minimise micro-climatic and solar access

impact on adjacent land or buildings, including effects of patterns of wind, temperature,

daylight, sunlight, glare and shadow.

12 June 2014

P42

121 Development should be designed and sited to ensure an adequate level of daylight,

minimise overshadowing of buildings, and public and private outdoor spaces, particularly

during the lunch time hours.

122 Development should not significantly reduce daylight to private open space, communal

open space, where such communal open space provides the primary private open space,

and habitable rooms in adjacent Residential Zones.

123 Glazing on building facades should not result in glare which produces discomfort or danger

to pedestrians, occupants of adjacent buildings and users of vehicles.

124 Buildings within the Core and Primary Pedestrian Areas identified in Map Adel/1 (Overlays

2, 2A and 3), unless specified otherwise within the relevant Zone or Policy Area, should be

designed to provide weather protection for pedestrians against rain, wind and sun. The

design of canopies, verandahs and awnings should be compatible with the style and

character of the building and adjoining buildings, as well as the desired character, both in

scale and detail.

125 Weather protection should not be introduced where it would interfere with the integrity or

heritage value of heritage places or unduly affect street trees.

126 Development that is over 21 metres in building height and is to be built at or on the street

frontage should minimise wind tunnel effect.

Stormwater Management

Objective 35: Development which maximises the use of stormwater.

Objective 36: Development designed and located to protect stormwater from pollution

sources.

Surface water (inland, marine, estuarine) and ground water has the potential to

be detrimentally affected by water run-off from development containing solid

and liquid wastes. Minimising and possibly eliminating sources of pollution will

reduce the potential for degrading water quality and enable increased use of

stormwater for a range of applications with environmental, economic and social

benefits.

Objective 37: Development designed and located to protect or enhance the environmental

values of receiving waters.

Objective 38: Development designed and located to prevent erosion.

Development involving soil disturbance may result in erosion and subsequently

sedimentation and pollutants entering receiving waters. Design techniques

should be incorporated during both the construction and operation phases of

development to minimise the transportation of sediment and pollutants off-site.

Objective 39: Development designed and located to prevent or minimise the risk of

downstream flooding.

127 Development of stormwater management systems should be designed and located to

improve the quality of stormwater, minimise pollutant transfer to receiving waters, and

protect downstream receiving waters from high levels of flow.

128 Development affecting existing stormwater management systems should be designed and

located to improve the quality of stormwater, minimise pollutant transfer to receiving

waters, and protect downstream receiving waters from high levels of flow.

12 June 2014

P43

129 Development should incorporate appropriate measures to minimise any concentrated

stormwater discharge from the site.

130 Development should incorporate appropriate measures to minimise the discharge of

sediment, suspended solids, organic matter, nutrients, bacteria and litter and other

contaminants to the stormwater system and may incorporate systems for treatment or use

on site.

131 Development should not cause deleterious affect on the quality or hydrology of

groundwater.

132 Development should manage stormwater to ensure that the design capacity of existing or

planned downstream systems are not exceeded, and other property or environments are

not adversely affected as a result of any concentrated stormwater discharge from the site.

Infrastructure

Objective 40: Minimisation of the visual impact of infrastructure facilities.

Objective 41: Provision of services and infrastructure that are appropriate for the intended

development and the desired character of the Zone or Policy Area.

133 Provision should be made for utility services to the site of a development, including

provision for the supply of water, gas and electricity and for the satisfactory disposal and

potential re-use of sewage and waste water, drainage and storm water from the site of the

development.

134 Service structures, plant and equipment within a site should be designed to be an integral

part of the development and should be suitably screened from public spaces or streets.

135 Infrastructure and utility services, including provision for the supply of water, gas and

electricity should be put in common trenches or conduits.

136 Development should only occur where it has access to adequate utilities and services,

including:

(a) electricity supply;

(b) water supply;

(c) drainage and stormwater systems;

(d) effluent disposal systems;

(e) formed all-weather public roads;

(f) telecommunications services; and

(g) gas services.

Built Form and Townscape

Objective 46: Reinforcement of the city’s grid pattern of streets through:

(a) high rise development framing city boulevards, the Squares and Park Lands

(b) vibrant main streets of a more intimate scale that help bring the city to life

(c) unique and interesting laneways that provide a sense of enclosure and

intimacy

(d) provide for a transition of building heights between Zone and Policy Areas

where building height guidelines differ.

Objective 47: Buildings should be designed to:

(a) reinforce the desired character of the area as contemplated by the minimum

and maximum building heights in the Zone and Policy Area provisions;

(b) maintain a sense of openness to the sky and daylight to public spaces, open

space areas and existing buildings;

(c) contribute to pedestrian safety and comfort; and

12 June 2014

P44

(d) provide for a transition of building heights between Zone and Policy Areas

where building height guidelines differ.

Objective 48: Development which incorporates a high level of design excellence in terms of

scale, bulk, massing, materials, finishes, colours and architectural treatment.

Height, Bulk and Scale

168 Development should be of a high standard of design and should reinforce the grid layout

and distinctive urban character of the City by maintaining a clear distinction between the

following:

(a) the intense urban development and built-form of the town acres in the Capital City,

Main Street, City Frame and Residential Zones;

(b) the less intense and more informal groupings of buildings set within the landscaped

environment of the Institutional Zones;

(c) The historic character of the North Adelaide Historic (Conservation) Zone; and

(d) the open landscape of the Park Lands Zone.

169 The height and scale of development and the type of land use should reflect and respond

to the role of the street it fronts as illustrated on Map Adel/1 (Overlay 1).

170 The height, scale and massing of buildings should reinforce:

(a) the desired character, built form, public environment and scale of the streetscape as

contemplated within the Zone and Policy Area, and have regard to:

(i) maintaining consistent parapet lines, floor levels, height and massing with existing

buildings consistent with the areas desired character;

(ii) reflecting the prevailing pattern of visual sub-division of neighbouring building

frontages where frontages display a character pattern of vertical and horizontal

sub-divisions; and

(iii) avoiding massive unbroken facades.

(b) a comfortable proportion of human scale at street level by:

(i) building ground level to the street frontage where zero set-backs prevail;

(ii) breaking up the building facade into distinct elements;

(iii) incorporating art work and wall and window detailing; and

(iv) including attractive planting, seating and pedestrian shelter.

172 Buildings and structures should not adversely affect by way of their height and location the

longterm operational, safety and commercial requirements of Adelaide International

Airport. Buildings and structures which exceed the heights shown in Map Adel/1 (Overlay

5) and which penetrate the Obstacle Limitation Surfaces (OLS) should be designed,

marked or lit to ensure the safe operation of aircraft within the airspace around the

Adelaide International Airport.

173 Development in a non-residential Zone that abuts land in a Residential Zone or the North

Adelaide Historic (Conservation) Zone should provide a transition between high intensity

development and the lower intensity development in the adjacent Zone by focussing taller

elements away from the common Zone boundary.

271 Development located either abutting, straddling or within 20 metres of a Zone or Policy

Area boundary should provide for a transition and reasonable gradation from the character

desired from one to the other.

272 Development should not unreasonably restrict the development potential of adjacent sites,

and should have regard to possible future impacts such as loss of daylight/sunlight access,

privacy and outlook.

12 June 2014

P45

Composition and Proportion

182 Development should respect the composition and proportion of architectural elements of

building facades that form an important pattern which contributes to the streetscape’s

distinctive character in a manner consistent with the desired character of a locality by:

(a) establishing visual links with neighbouring buildings by reflecting and reinforcing the

prevailing pattern of visual sub-division in building facades where a pattern of vertical

and/or horizontal sub-divisions is evident and desirable, for example, there may be

strong horizontal lines of verandahs, masonry courses, podia or openings, or there may

be vertical proportions in the divisions of facades or windows; and

(b) clearly defining ground, middle and roof top levels.

183 Where there is little or no established building pattern, new buildings should create new

features which contribute to an areas desired character and the way the urban

environment is understood by:

(a) frontages creating clearly defined edges;

(b) generating new compositions and points of interest;

(c) introducing elements for future neighbouring buildings; and

(d) emphasising the importance of the building according to the street hierarchy.

Articulation and Modelling

184 Building facades fronting street frontages, access ways, driveways or public spaces should

be composed with an appropriate scale, rhythm and proportion which responds to the use

of the building, the desired character of the locality and the modelling and proportions of

adjacent buildings

185 Balconies should be designed to give shelter to the street or public space at first floor

levels.

186 Balconies should:

(a) respond to the street context and building orientation; and

(b) incorporate balustrade detailing to reflect the balcony type and location and the

materials and detail of the building facade.

187 No part of any fully enclosed building should extend over property boundaries, including

streets and public spaces, whether above a balcony at a lower level or not.

188 Building services such as drainage pipes together with security grills/screens, ventilation

louvers and car park entry doors, should be coordinated and integrated with the overall

facade design.

Materials, Colours and Finishes

189 The design, external materials, colours and finishes of buildings should have regard to

their surrounding townscape context, built form and public environment, consistent with

the desired character of the relevant Zone and Policy Area.

190 Development should be finished with materials that are sympathetic to the design and

setting of the new building and which incorporate recycled or low embodied energy

materials. The form, colour, texture and quality of materials should be of high quality,

durable and contribute to the desired character of the locality. Materials, colours and

finishes should not necessarily imitate materials and colours of an existing streetscape.

191 Materials and finishes that are easily maintained and do not readily stain, discolour or

deteriorate should be utilised.

192 Development should avoid the use of large expanses of highly reflective materials and

large areas of monotonous, sheer materials (such as polished granite and curtained wall

glazing).

12 June 2014

P46

Sky and Roof Lines

Objective 49: Innovative and interesting skylines which contribute to the overall design and

performance of the building.

194 Where a prevailing pattern of roof form assists in establishing the desired character of the

locality, new roof forms should be complementary to the shape, pitch, angle and materials

of adjacent building roofs.

195 Buildings should be designed to incorporate well designed roof tops that:

(a) reinforce the desired character of the locality, as expressed in the relevant Zone or

Policy Area;

(b) enhance the skyline and local views;

(c) contribute to the architectural quality of the building;

(d) provide a compositional relationship between the upper-most levels and the lower

portions of the building;

(e) provide an expression of identity;

(f) articulate the roof, breaking down its massing on large buildings to minimise apparent

bulk;

(g) respond to the orientation of the site; and

(h) create minimal glare.

196 Roof top plant and ancillary equipment that projects above the ceiling of the top storey

should:

(a) be designed to minimise the visual impact; and

(b) be screened from view, including the potential view looking down or across from

existing or possible higher buildings, or be included in a decorative roof form that is

integrated into the design of the building.

197 Roof design should facilitate future use for sustainable functions such as:

(a) rainwater tanks for water conservation;

(b) roof surfaces orientated, angled and of suitable material for photovoltaic applications;

and/or

(c) “green” roofs (ie roof top gardens structurally capable of supporting vegetation) or

water features.

Active Street Frontages

Objective 50: Development that enhances the public environment and, where appropriate

provides activity and interest at street level, reinforcing a locality’s desired

character.

Objective 51: Development designed to promote pedestrian activity and provide a high quality

experience for City residents, workers and visitors by:

(a) enlivening building edges;

(b) creating welcoming, safe and vibrant spaces;

(c) improving perceptions of public safety through passive surveillance; and

(d) creating interesting and lively pedestrian environments.

198 Development should be designed to create active street frontages that provide activity and

interest to passing pedestrians and contribute to the liveliness, vitality and security of the

public realm.

199 Retail frontages should be designed to provide interest to passing pedestrians at street

level and relief to building mass.

200 Commercial buildings should be designed to ensure that ground floor facades are rich in

detail so they are exciting to walk by, interesting to look at and to stand beside

12 June 2014

P47

201 Residential development should be designed to create interesting pedestrian environments

and resident surveillance of any street, accessway and driveway.

Landscaping

Objective 55: Water conserving landscaping that enhances the local landscape character and

creates a pleasant, safe and attractive living environment.

209 Landscaping should:

(a) be selected and designed for water conservation;

(b) form an integral part of the design of development; and

(c) be used to foster human scale, define spaces, reinforce paths and edges, screen utility

areas and enhance the visual amenity of the area.

210 Landscaping should incorporate local indigenous species suited to the site and

development, provided such landscaping is consistent with the desired character of the

locality and any heritage place.

211 Landscaping should be provided to all areas of communal space, driveways and shared car

parking areas.

212 Landscaping between the road and dwellings should be provided to screen and protect the

dwellings from dust and visual impacts of the road.

Transport and Access

Access and Movement

Objective 60: Access to and movement within the City that is easy, safe, comfortable and

convenient with priority given to pedestrian and cyclist safety and access.

226 Development should provide safe, convenient and comfortable access and movement.

227 Vehicle access points along primary and secondary city access roads and local connector

roads, as shown on Map Adel/1 (Overlay 1) should be restricted.

Pedestrian Access

Objective 61: Development that promotes the comfort, enjoyment and security of pedestrians

by providing shelter and reducing conflict with motor vehicles.

Objective 62: Development that contributes to the quality of the public realm as a safe, secure

and attractive environment for pedestrian movement and social interaction.

Objective 63: Safe and convenient design of and access to buildings and public spaces,

particularly for people with disabilities.

228 Development should reflect the significance of the paths and increase the permeability of

the pedestrian network identified within Map Adel/1 (Overlay 2) by ensuring:

(a) pedestrians are not disrupted or inconvenienced by badly designed or located vehicle

access ramps in footpaths or streets; and

(b) vehicle and service entry points are kept to a minimum to avoid adverse impact on

pedestrian amenity.

230 Development should provide and maintain pedestrian shelter, access and through-site

links in accordance with the walking routes identified within Map Adel/1 (Overlays 2, 2A

and 3) and the provisions of the Zone or Policy Area in which it is located. Such facilities

should be appropriately designed and detailed to enhance the pedestrian environment,

have regard to the mobility needs of people with disabilities, and be safe, suitable and

accessible.

12 June 2014

P48

232 Permanent structures over a footpath should have a minimum clearance of 3.0 metres

above the existing footpath level, except for advertisements which should have a minimum

clearance of 2.5 metres and temporary structures and retractable canopies which should

have a minimum clearance of 2.3 metres above the existing footpath level.

233 Where posts are required to support permanent structures, they should be located at least

600 millimetres from the kerb line.

234 Access for people with disabilities should be provided to and within all buildings to which

members of the public have access in accordance with the relevant Australian Standards.

Such access should be provided through the principal entrance, subject to heritage

considerations and for exemptions under the relevant legislation.

Bicycle Access

Objective 64: Greater use of bicycles for travel to and within the City and the improvement of

conditions, safety and facilities for cyclists.

Objective 65: Adequate supply of secure, short stay and long stay bicycle parking to support

desired growth in City activities.

235 Development should have regard to the bicycle routes identified within Map Adel/1

(Overlay 3) by:

(a) limiting vehicular access points; and

(b) ensuring that vehicles can enter and leave the site in a forward direction, thereby

avoiding reverse manoeuvres.

236 An adequate supply of on-site secure bicycle parking should be provided to meet the

demand generated by the development within the site area of the development. Bicycle

parking should be provided in accordance with the requirements set out in Table Adel/6.

Table Adel/6 Bicycle Parking Provisions

Type of development Bicycle parking space standard for employees and/or residents

Bicycle parking space standard for customers, visitors and / or shoppers

Medium to high scale residential 1 per dwelling /apartment with a total floor area less than 150 sq metres 2 per dwelling /apartment with a total floor area greater than 150 sq metres

1 for every 10 dwellings

Office/Ancillary retail services

1 per 200 sq metres of GLA 2 plus 1 per 1000 sq metres of GLA

237 Onsite secure bicycle parking facilities for residents and employees (long stay) should be:

(a) located in a prominent place;

(b) located at ground floor level;

(c) located undercover;

(d) located where passive surveillance is possible, or covered by CCTV;

(e) well lit and well signed;

(f) close to well used entrances;

(g) accessible by cycling along a safe, well lit route;

(h) take the form of a secure cage with locking rails inside or individual bicycle lockers;

and

(i) in the case of a cage have an access key/pass common to the building access key/pass.

238 Onsite secure bicycle parking facilities for short stay users (i.e. bicycle rails) should be:

(a) directly associated with the main entrance;

(b) located at ground floor level;

12 June 2014

P49

(c) located undercover;

(d) well lit and well signed;

(e) located where passive surveillance is possible, or covered by CCTV; and

(f) accessible by cycling along a safe, well lit route.

239 Access to bicycle parking should be designed to:

(a) minimise conflict with motor vehicles and pedestrians;

(b) ensure the route is well signed and well lit including the use of road markings such as a

bicycle logo if appropriate to help guide cyclists; and

(c) ensure the route is unhindered by low roof heights.

240 To facilitate and encourage the use of bicycles and walking as a means of travel to and

from the place of work, commercial and institutional development should provide on-site

shower and changing facilities.

Public Transport

Objective 66: Development that promotes the use of sustainable transport consistent with

State Government objectives and initiatives.

Objective 67: Accessible public transport for all metropolitan residents and visitors and safe

and attractive facilities for public transport users.

241 Development along a high concentration public transport route should be designed to

ensure that activity and interest for public transport passengers is maximised through the

incorporation of active street frontages.

242 Development along high concentration public transport routes identified in Map Adel/1

(Overlay 4) should:

(a) ensure there are pedestrian links through the site if needed to provide access to public

transport;

(b) provide shelter (e.g. verandahs) for pedestrians against wind, sun and rain;

(c) provide interest and activity at street level; and

(d) where possible, avoid vehicle access across high concentration public transport routes

identified in Map Adel/1 (Overlay 4). Where unavoidable, vehicle access should be

integrated into the design of the development whilst retaining active street frontages.

Traffic and Vehicle Access

Objective 68: Development that supports a shift toward active and sustainable transport modes

(i.e. public transport, cycling and walking).

Objective 69: An enhanced City environment and the maintenance of an appropriate hierarchy

of roads to distribute traffic into the City to serve development in preference to

through traffic.

Objective 70: Adequate off-street facilities for loading and unloading of courier, delivery and

service vehicles and access for emergency vehicles.

243 Development should be designed so that vehicle access points for parking, servicing or

deliveries, and pedestrian access to a site, are located to minimise traffic hazards and

vehicle queuing on public roads. Access should be safe, convenient and suitable for the

development on the site, and should be obtained from minor streets and lanes unless

otherwise stated in the provisions for the relevant Zone or Policy Area and provided

residential amenity is not unreasonably affected.

244 Facilities for the loading and unloading of courier, delivery and service vehicles and access

for emergency vehicles should be provided on-site as appropriate to the size and nature of

12 June 2014

P50

the development. Such facilities should be screened from public view and designed, where

possible, so that vehicles may enter and leave in a forward direction.

245 Where practicable, development sites should contain sufficient space for the location of

construction equipment during the course of building construction, so that development

does not rely on the use of Council road reserves to locate such equipment.

246 Vehicular access to development located within the Core and Primary Pedestrian Areas

identified in Map Adel/1 (Overlay 2A) should be limited and designed to minimise

interruption to street frontages.

247 Where vehicular access to a development is gained by an existing crossing in the Core

Pedestrian Area identified in Map Adel/1 (Overlay 2A), there should be no increase in the

number of parking spaces served by the crossing, nor any increase in the number of

existing crossings serving that development.

248 The number of access points on primary city access roads identified in Map Adel/1

(Overlay 1) should be limited to minimise traffic and pedestrian inconvenience,

interference with public transport facilities and adverse effects on the environment.

249 Buildings located along primary and secondary access roads should be sited to avoid the

need for vehicles to reverse on to the road (unless the dimensions of the site make this

impractical).

250 Access roads within residential development should:

(a) provide convenient access for emergency vehicles, visitors and residents;

(b) enable vehicles to enter and leave a site in a forward direction;

(c) provide a comfortable and safe pedestrian environment; and

(d) be well lit.

251 Access roads within residential development for older people and people with disabilities

should:

(a) include platforms across roadways at pedestrian crossing points;

(b) not have steep gradients; and

(c) have level surface passenger loading areas.

Car Parking

Objective 71: To meet community expectation for parking supply while supporting a shift

toward active and sustainable transport modes.

Objective 72: An adequate supply of short-stay and long-stay parking to support desired

growth in City activities without detrimental affect on traffic and pedestrian flows.

252 Car parking areas should be located and designed to:

(a) ensure safe and convenient pedestrian movement and traffic circulation through and

within the car parking area;

(b) include adequate provision for manoeuvring and individually accessible car standing

areas;

(c) enable, where practical, vehicles to enter and leave the site in a forward direction;

(d) minimise interruption to the pattern of built form along street frontages;

(e) provide for access off minor streets and for the screening from public view of such car

parking areas by buildings on the site wherever possible;

(f) minimise adverse impacts on adjoining residential properties in relation to noise and

access and egress;

(g) minimise loss of existing on-street parking spaces arising through crossovers and

access;

(h) incorporate secure bicycle parking spaces and facilitate convenient, safe and

comfortable access to these spaces by cyclists; and

12 June 2014

P51

(i) provide landscaping, such as semi-mature trees, to shade parked vehicles and reduce

the visual impact of the car parking area while maintaining direct sight lines and

informal visual surveillance.

253 All development should provide car parking spaces for people with disabilities in

accordance with the requirements in the Building Code of Australia (BCA). For classes of

buildings not covered by the requirements of the BCA, the number of spaces should be

provided in accordance with Table Adel/7 and such car parking spaces should comply with

Australian Standard 2890.1: ‘Parking Facilities - Off-street Car Parking’.

255 Off-street parking should:

(a) be controlled in accordance with the provisions for the relevant Policy Area;

(b) be located away from street frontages or designed as an integral part of buildings on

the site. Provision of parking at basement level is encouraged; and

(c) not include separate garages or carports in front of buildings within front set-backs.

264 In areas outside the Core and Primary Pedestrian Areas identified in Map Adel/1 (Overlays

2, 2A and 3), car parking may be provided to serve a development within the site of the

development or elsewhere. Where car parking is provided, it should be:

(a) provided with vehicle access points that do not cross major walking routes identified in

Map Adel/1 (Overlay 2); and

(b) located away from frontages to major streets wherever possible.

266 Car parking associated with development for older people and people with disabilities

should:

(a) be conveniently located on site within easy walking distance to resident units;

(b) be adequate for residents, staff, service providers and visitors in accordance with the

requirements set out in Table Adel/7;

(c) include separate and appropriately marked places for people with disabilities and

spaces for small electrically powered vehicles;

(d) have slip-resistant surfaces with low gradients;

(e) allow ease of vehicle manoeuvrability;

(f) be designed to allow the full opening of all vehicle doors; and

(g) minimise the impact of car parking on adjacent residences due to visual intrusion,

noise and emission of fumes.

Economic Growth and Land Use

Objective 73: The role of the City enhanced as:

(a) the community, civic and cultural heart of South Australia and as a driving

force in the prosperity of the State;

(b) the State centre for business, administration, services, employment,

education, political and cultural activities, government and public

administration;

(c) a welcoming, secure, attractive and accessible meeting place for the people of

metropolitan Adelaide and beyond for leisure, entertainment, civic and

cultural activity, specialty shopping, personal and community services;

(d) a centre for education and research built on key academic strengths and on

the excellent learning environment and student accommodation available in

the City;

(e) a supportive environment for the development of new enterprises drawing on

the cultural, educational, research, commercial and information technology

strengths of the City centre;

(f) the gateway to the attractions of South Australia for international and

interstate visitors by developing a wide range of visitor accommodation,

facilities and attractions, particularly attractions which showcase the

particular strengths of South Australia; and

(g) a great place to live, with a growing diversity of accommodation for different

incomes and lifestyles.

12 June 2014

P52

Objective 74: A business environment which encourages investment from domestic and foreign

sources, business development and employment.

Objective 75: Development which reinforces clusters and nodes of activity and distinctive local

character.

Objective 76: A diverse mix of commercial, community, civic and residential activities to meet

the future needs of the Capital City of South Australia.

267 Development, particularly within the Capital City and Institutional Zones, is encouraged to:

(a) provide a range of shopping facilities in locations that are readily accessible;

(b) provide for the growth in economic activities that sustain and enhance the

variety and mix of land uses and the character and function of the City;

(c) maximise opportunities for co-location, multiple use and sharing of facilities;

(d) be accessible to all modes of transport (particularly public transport) and safe

pedestrian and cycling routes; and

(e) have minimal impact on the amenity of residential areas.

269 Development is encouraged to develop and expand upon the existing or create new

tourism activities to maximise employment and the long-term economic, social and

cultural benefits of developing the City as a competitive domestic and international tourist

destination.

270 Tourist facilities should be compatible with the prevailing character of the area, within

close proximity to public transport facilities and well designed and sited.

272 Development should not unreasonably restrict the development potential of adjacent sites,

and should have regard to possible future impacts such as loss of daylight/sunlight access,

privacy and outlook.

Squares and Public Spaces*

Objective 57: High quality, readily accessible external and internal open spaces in appropriate

locations that form an integral part of the public domain, provide sanctuary, visual

pleasure and a range of recreational and leisure opportunities and contribute to

the City’s pedestrian and bicycle network.

Objective 58: Development that conserves and enhances the City’s squares, improves their

visual amenity, increases their range of uses, and maximises pedestrian

accessibility to their landscaped areas.

Objective 59: A distinctive Adelaide streetscape identity through the use of street furniture,

graphics, public art, signs, lighting and landscaping, recognising existing visually

significant buildings and trees.

221 The Squares should be for the relaxation, enjoyment and leisure of the City's workers,

residents, students and visitors. The landscaped area of the Squares should where

possible, be enlarged to improve visual and functional amenity. Development should:

(a) maximise pedestrian convenience, safety and access to the landscaped area of the

Squares and reduce conflict between pedestrians and vehicles;

(b) contribute to the amenity of the City through the provision of tall trees and other

suitable drought tolerant planting;

(c) provide facilities such as seating, rest areas, and weather protection to enhance

cultural, social and outdoor recreational activity;

(d) maintain a high quality of lighting for security and amenity;

(e) minimise buildings, structures, utilities and service facilities; and

(f) maintain a high quality of design.

12 June 2014

P53

222 Development fronting public spaces should be of a high standard of design and should

reinforce the distinctive urban character of the City by:

(a) defining and enclosing the City Squares with a continuous edge of peripheral buildings

which:

(i) are of relatively consistent height and scale as appropriate to the desired character

surrounding each of the Squares;

(ii) are designed to maintain the continuity of the streetscape;

(iii) are situated close to or abutting the Square frontages;

(iv) provide ground floor activities that support the public use of the space; and

(v) are designed and sited to minimise overshadowing of the Square’s garden areas.

(b) enhancing interest, use, safety and a range of activities by ensuring:

(i) facades abutting public spaces provide visual interest; and

(ii) appropriate elements of public art;

(c) defining the major streets as important linear public spaces which display a formal

townscape character by:

(i) ensuring that buildings in the Capital City Zone maintain or re-establish, a

continuous edge of built-form abutting or situated close to major street frontages;

(ii) emphasising the townscape importance of development at the intersections of

major streets, and intersections of major streets with City Squares, with corner

buildings of a scale and form appropriate to their location and situated close to or

abutting both street frontages;

(iii) ensuring that buildings fronting on to such streets are of a shape and orientation

which relate to and reinforce the rectilinear grid pattern of the City; and

(iv) requiring that any substantial set-back, open space or plaza be behind a built-form

or landscape element which maintains or reinforces the continuity and line of the

street frontage;

(d) maintaining the existing pattern and structure of streets and laneways;

(e) restricting building over minor streets and laneways to avoid over-shadowing and

preserve the built-form pattern established by traditional land sub-division in the City;

and

(f) allowing for ease of pedestrian circulation and through access where possible

223 Development on, over, encroaching upon, or opening on to public spaces should not

endanger public safety or cause undue inconvenience to either pedestrians, including

persons with disabilities, or users of vehicles, and should ensure adequate alignment of

building levels to surface levels.

224 Cornices, sunscreens and hoods should:

(a) have a minimum height of 3 metres above the level of the footway or 5 metres above

a carriageway;

(b) have a maximum projection of 1.2 metres over a public space which exceeds 10

metres in width and a maximum of 600 millimetres over a public space which is 10

metres or less in width; and

(c) be constructed to prevent water dripping or running into a public place.

225 Public spaces should allow good visibility into and across the space to promote security

and safety and should provide opportunities for citizens to meet and socialise.

PL

PL

RA7

CF

CC

CITY OF UNLEY

RA6MS5

CF439

465

459

4411

479

191

161171

80

194

172

162

401

439

411

159

131

111

89

61

115

130

160

160

112

90

81

440

442

450

480

462

472

161

440

AVOCA

AVO

CA

S

GRACE PLACELING PLACE

CO

LLIN

S ST

REE

T

WEI

L ST

REE

T

HALLS PLACE

GILBERT STREET

HOLLAND STREET

O'HALLORAN LANE

PER

CY

CO

UR

T

FIRST STREETPARK LANE

HU

RM

AN S

TREE

T

STAFFORD STREETTHIR

D S

TRE

ET

LORNE PLACE

SEC

ON

D S

TREE

T

OW

EN

ST

REE

T

O'H

ALLO

RAN

STR

EET

HAMILTON PLACE

STAFFORD LANE

O'HALLORAN PLACE

REEVES STREET

MO

RPH

ETT

S

TREE

T

KING

WILLIAM

STREET

SOUTH TERRACE

GREENHILL ROAD

SIR LEW

IS CO

HEN

AVENU

E

PEACO

CK R

OAD

MA

P Adel/31 A

DJO

INS

MAP Adel/24 ADJOINS

MA

P A

del/2

9 A

DJO

INS

MS5 Main Street (Adelaide) Zone

RA6 Residential (Whitmore East) Zone

CC Capital City Zone

Zone BoundaryDevelopment Plan Boundary

ADELAIDE (CITY)

3000metres 100 200Scale 1:4150

ZONESMAP Adel/30

NOTE : For Policy Areas See MAP Adel/61

RA7 Residential (Whitmore West) Zone

CF City Frame Zone

PL Park Lands Zone

Consolidated - 30 January 2014

22

CITY OF UNLEY

Veale Gardens

Wattle Grove

Park No. 21W

Park No. 21E

439

465

459

4411

479

191

161171

80

194

172

162

401

439

411

159

131

111

89

61

115

130

160

160

90

81

440

442

450

480

462

472

161

440

AVOCA

AV

OC

A S

GRACE PLACELING PLACE

CO

LLIN

S S

TR

EE

T

WE

IL S

TR

EE

T

HALLS PLACE

GILBERT STREET

HOLLAND STREET

O'HALLORAN LANE

PE

RC

Y C

OU

RT

FIRST STREET

PARK LANE

HU

RM

AN

ST

RE

ET

STAFFORD STREETTH

IRD

ST

RE

ET

LORNE PLACE

SE

CO

ND

ST

RE

ET

OW

EN

ST

RE

ET

O'H

ALL

OR

AN

ST

RE

ET

HAMILTON PLACESTAFFORD LANE

O'HALLORAN PLACE

REEVES STREET

MO

RP

HE

TT

ST

RE

ET

SIR

LEW

IS C

OH

EN

AV

EN

UE

GREENHILL ROAD

KIN

G W

ILLIAM

ST

RE

ET

PE

AC

OC

K R

OA

D

SOUTH TERRACE

MA

P A

del/62 AD

JOIN

SM

AP

Ade

l/60

AD

JOIN

SMAP Adel/55 ADJOINS

22 Southern Park Lands Policy Area

Policy Area Boundary

Development Plan Boundary

ADELAIDE (CITY)

3000metres 100 200

Scale 1:4150

POLICY AREASMAP Adel/61

State Heritage Place Local Heritage Place

Consolidated - 30 January 2014

WES T TC

E

NORTH TCE

SOUTH TCE

CURRIE ST

GROTE ST

HINDLEY ST

GOUGER ST

GILBERT ST

FRANKLIN ST

STURT ST

WRIGHT ST

MO

RPH

ETT

ST

KIN

G W

ILLI

AM

ST

WAYMOUTH ST PIRIE ST

ANGAS ST

GILLES ST

HALIFAX ST

FLINDERS ST

GRENFELL ST

CARRINGTON ST

WAKEFIELD ST

MO

RPH

ETT

ST

WRIGHT ST

STURT ST

MO

RPH

ETT

ST

KIN

G W

ILLI

AM

ST

WAYMOUTH ST

53

53

53

53

43

43

43

28

53

No Prescribed Height Limit

Maximum Building Height (metres) within Capital City zoned land

City Boulevards and Terraces Policy Areas of a ‘Main Street’ type

±ADELAIDE (CITY)

BUILDING HEIGHTSConcept Plan Figure CC/1

1:8000

Note: Airport Building Height Restrictions Apply. Refer Map Adel/1 (Overlay 5).

0 120 240 360 480 600 metres

MA

P CC

/2 AD

JOIN

S

Consolidated - 30 January 2014

ADELAIDE (CITY) FUTURE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER

MAP Adel/1 (Overlay 9)

1000 0metres 500

Scale 1:26,000 Predominantly Natural Landscape

Predominantly Cultural Landscape

Predominantly Recreational Landscape

North

South

Mor

phet

t S

tree

t

Wes

t T

erra

ce

Kin

g

W

illia

m

Pul

tene

y

S

tree

t

Melbourne S

treet

O’C

onnell Street

Hut

t

S

tree

t

S

tree

t

Terrace

Terrace

Consolidated - 30 January 2014

North

South

Mor

phet

t S

tree

t

Wes

t T

erra

ce

Kin

g

W

illia

m

Pul

tene

y

S

tree

t

Melbourne S

treet

O’C

onnell Street

Hut

t

S

tree

t

S

tree

t

Terrace

Terrace

ADELAIDE (CITY)PROPOSED LIGHTING FRAMEWORK

MAP Adel/1 (Overlay 13)

10000metres 500

Scale 1:26,000Precincts of Higher Coverage / Amenity / Safety

Precincts of Lower Coverage / Amenity / Safety

Development Plan BoundaryConsolidated - 30 January 2014