insurance & coastal risk in florida an economic analysis robert p. hartwig, ph.d., cpcu,...
TRANSCRIPT
Insurance & Coastal Riskin Florida
An Economic Analysis
Robert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU, President & Chief EconomistInsurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038
Tel: (212) 346-5520 Fax: (212) 732-1916 [email protected] www.iii.org
Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund7th Annual Participating Insurers Workshop
Orlando, FL
June 7, 2007
Presentation Outline
• Review of Florida Hurricane Risk: An Insurance Industry Perspective
• Florida Exposure AnalysisHow Bad is It?Could it Get Any Worse?
• Are Florida’s Development Patterns Rational?Examination of Stakeholder Incentives
• How Insurers Signal What Should be Built & WherePrivate vs. Government-run Insurers
• Role of Risk Perception• What Works, What Doesn’t• Overview of a National Catastrophe Plan• State-Run Plans• Recommendations
U.S. Insured Catastrophe Losses*$7
.5
$2.7
$4.7
$22.
9
$5.5 $1
6.9
$8.3
$7.4
$2.6 $1
0.1
$8.3
$4.6
$26.
5
$5.9 $1
2.9 $2
7.5
$1.2
$100
.0
$61.
9
$9.2
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06
07Q
1
20??
*Excludes $4B-$6b offshore energy losses from Hurricanes Katrina & Rita. Note: 2001 figure includes $20.3B for 9/11 losses reported through 12/31/01. Includes only business and personal property claims, business interruption and auto claims. Non-prop/BI losses = $12.2B.Source: Property Claims Service/ISO; Insurance Information Institute
$ Billions
2006 was a welcome respite. 2005 was by far the worst
year ever for insured catastrophe losses in the US, but the worst has yet to come.
$100 Billion CAT year is coming soon
Landfalling Hurricanes: 1900-2006FL Landfalls are Common
183
70
26
0
50
100
150
200
All Landfalling: 1900-2006
FL Landfalling FL CAT 3+Landfalling
Source: HURDAT database; Insurance Information Institute.
A hurricane strikes FL every other year on average—CAT 3+ every 4 years
38% of all hurricane landfalls occur in FL
37% of all FL landfalls are
CAT 3+
1.7 hurricanes make landfall each year on average
Top 10 Most Costly Hurricanes in US History, (Insured Losses, $2005)
$3.5 $3.8 $4.8 $5.0$6.6 $7.4 $7.7
$10.3
$21.6
$40.6
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
$40
$45
Georges(1998)
Jeanne(2004)
Frances(2004)
Rita (2005)
Hugo(1989)
Ivan (2004)
Charley(2004)
Wilma(2005)
Andrew(1992)
Katrina(2005)
$ B
illi
ons
Sources: ISO/PCS; Insurance Information Institute.
Storms affecting Florida in yellow.
Seven of the 10 most expensive hurricanes in US history
occurred in the 14 months from Aug. 2004 – Oct. 2005:
Nine of the 10 affected Florida!
Inflation-Adjusted U.S. Insured Catastrophe Losses By Cause of Loss,
1986-2005¹
Utility Disruption0.1%
Terrorism7.7%
All Tropical
Cyclones3
47.5%
Tornadoes2
24.5%
Water Damage0.1%
Civil Disorders0.4%
Fire6
2.3%
Wind/Hail/Flood5
2.8%
Earthquakes4
6.7%
Winter Storms7.8%
Source: Insurance Services Office (ISO)..
1 Catastrophes are all events causing direct insured losses to property of $25 million or more in 2005 dollars. Catastrophe threshold changed from $5 million to $25 million beginning in 1997. Adjusted for inflation by the III.2 Excludes snow. 3 Includes hurricanes and tropical storms. 4 Includes other geologic events such as volcanic eruptions and other earth movement. 5 Does not include flood damage covered by the federally administered National Flood Insurance Program. 6 Includes wildland fires.
Insured disaster losses totaled $289.1 billion from
1984-2005 (in 2005 dollars). Tropical systems accounted for nearly half of all CAT losses from 1986-2005, up
from 27.1% from 1984-2003.
Insured Losses from Top 10 Hurricanes Since 1990 & Katrina Adjusted for Inflation, Growth in Coastal
Properties, Real Growth in Property Values & Increased Property Insurance Coverage
$10.1 $11.0 $12.4 $12.6 $13.1 $14.5
$20.8 $21.1
$31.3
$40.0
$65.3
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
Number 9(1909,
FL)
Hazel(1954,NC)
Number 4(1938,NY)
Number 2(1919,
FL)
Number 4(1928,
FL)
Bestsy(1965,LA)
Number 2(1915,TX)
Number 1(1900,TX)
Andrew(1992,
FL)
Katrina(2005,LA)*
Number 6(1926, FL)
$ B
illi
ons
The p/c insurance industry will likely experience a $20B+ event approximately every 10-12 years, on average—mostly
associated with hurricanes
*ISO/PCS estimate as of October 10, 2005.Source: Hurricane Katrina: Analysis of the Impact on the Insurance Industry, Tillinghast, October 2005; Insurance Info. Institute.
(Billions of 2005 Dollars) Plurality of worst-case
scenarios involve Florida
Hurricane Damage from Top 10 Hurricanes Since 1900 Adjusted for Inflation, Growth in Coastal Properties, Real Growth in Property Values*
$19.2 $23.9$30.3 $34.3 $35.0
$50.2 $50.8 $53.1
$80.0
$129.7
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$ B
illi
ons
Hurricanes causing $50B+ in economic losses will
become more frequently
*Includes damage form wind and storm surge but generally excludes inland flooding.Source: Roger Pielke and Christopher Landsea, December 2005; Insurance Info. Institute.
(Billions of 2004 Dollars) Great Miami Hurricane
Florida Homeowners InsuranceMarket Share (As of 12/31/06)
16.3%
6.6%
4.3%
4.2%
4.0%
3.7%
2.8%
2.7%
2.3%
35.0%
18.1%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
State Farm
FL Citizens
Allstate
Tower Hill
Universal P&C
USAA
Nationwide
Liberty Mutual
ARX Holding Corp.
Universal Ins. Co. Grp.
All Other
*Computed based in direct premiums written (DPW). Actual exposure to hurricane loss may differ due to reinsurance purchased and location of risk.Source: Fitch Ratings, Hurricane Season 2007: A Desk Reference for Investors, June 1, 2007.
While State Farm leads in premium, Citizens leads in
exposure
Florida Residential Insurance Admitted Market Breakdown
Citizens30%
PUPs*30%
Other10%
FL-Only Unaffiliated Cos
30%
Risk is highly concentrated in
Florida in Citizens and FL-only companies
*PUPs are Florida-only subsidiaries of companies with multi-state or national operations.Source: Citizens Property Insurance Corp.
2006
Florida Property Insurance Market Breakdown (as of 12/31/05)
Source: Florida Citizens Property Insurance Corp.; Insurance Info, Institute.
Admitted97%
Surplus3%
Residential Commercial
Most commercial market risks covered in surplus lines market. Implies
regulators need to allow more flexibility for residential insurers.
Admitted40%
Surplus60%
Top 10 Deadliest Hurricanes to Strike the US: 1851-2006
372 390 400 408 7001,250 1,323 1,500
2,500
8,000
01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,0007,0008,0009,000
LA-Gra
nde Isle
(190
9)
Audre
y-SW
LA,T
X (195
7)
LA-Las
t Isla
nd (185
6)
FL Key
s (19
35)
GA/SC (1
881)
LA-Chen
iere (
1893
)***
**
Katrin
a (SE
LA, M
S)***
*
SC/GA S
ea Is
lands (
1893
)***
SE FL/L
. Oke
chob
ee (1
928)
**
Galva
ston (1
900)
*
*Could be as high as 12,000 **Could be as high as 3,000 ***Midpoint of 1,000 – 2,000 range****Associated Press total as of Dec. 11, 2005. *****Midpoint of 1,100-1,400 range.Sources: NOAA; Insurance Information Institute.
Hurricane Katrina was the deadliest hurricane to strike the US since 1928
Fear of death is no longer a factor in decision process
Total NFIP Claim Payments by State (Top 10) Jan 1, 1978 - Dec. 2004
$ Millions
$2,702.0
$2,226.7
$1,727.3
$687.2$419.9 $384.4 $377.8 $276.6
$422.6$473.4$598.2
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
TX FL LA NC NJ PA SC MO VA AL MS
Source: FEMA, National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
Until Katrina, Florida ranked 2nd in terms of
total flood claims payments.
Outlook for 2007 Hurricane Season: 85% Worse Than Average
Average* 2005 2007F
Named Storms 9.6 28 17Named Storm Days 49.1 115.5 85
Hurricanes 5.9 14 9Hurricane Days 24.5 47.5 40Intense Hurricanes 2.3 7 5
Intense Hurricane Days 5 7 11
Accumulated Cyclone Energy 96.2 NA 170
Net Tropical Cyclone Activity 100% 275% 185%*Average over the period 1950-2000.Source: Philip Klotzbach and Dr. William Gray, Colorado State University, May 31, 2007.
Probability of Major Hurricane Landfall (CAT 3, 4, 5) in 2007
Average* 2007F
Entire US Coast 52% 74%
US East Coast Including Florida Peninsula
31% 50%
Gulf Coast from FL Panhandle to Brownsville, TX
30% 49%
ALSO…Above-Average Major Hurricane
Landfall Risk in Caribbean for 2007
*Average over the period 1950-2000.Source: Philip Klotzbach and Dr. William Gray, Colorado State University, May 31, 2007.
Number of Major (Category 3, 4, 5) Hurricanes Striking the US by Decade
4
6
65
4
6
88
5
8
6
9
1900s 1910s 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s
*Figure for 2000s is extrapolated based on data for 2000-2005 (6 major storms: Charley, Ivan, Jeanne (2004) & Katrina, Rita, Wilma (2005)).Source: Tillinghast from National Hurricane Center: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pastint.shtm.
10
1930s – mid-1960s:
Period of Intense Tropical Cyclone Activity
Mid-1990s – 2030s?
New Period of Intense Tropical Cyclone Activity
Tropical cyclone activity in the mid-1990s entered the active
phase of the “multi-decadal signal” that could last into the 2030s
Already as many major storms in
2000-2005 as in all of the 1990s
Total Value of Insured Coastal Exposure (2004, $ Billions)
$1,901.6$740.0
$662.4$505.8
$404.9$209.3
$148.8$129.7$117.2$105.3
$75.9$73.0
$46.4$45.6$44.7$43.8
$12.1
$1,937.3
$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500
FloridaNew York
TexasMassachusetts
New JerseyConnecticut
LouisianaS. Carolina
VirginiaMaine
North CarolinaAlabamaGeorgia
DelawareNew Hampshire
MississippiRhode Island
Maryland
Source: AIR Worldwide
Florida has nearly $2 trillion in insured coastal exposure
Insured Coastal Exposure as a % of Statewide Insured Exposure (2004, $ Billions)
63.1%60.9%
57.9%54.2%
37.9%33.6%33.2%
28.0%25.6%25.6%
23.3%13.5%
12.0%11.4%
8.9%5.9%
1.4%
79.3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
FloridaConnecticut
New YorkMaine
MassachusettsLouisiana
New JerseyDelaware
Rhode IslandS. Carolina
TexasNH
MississippiAlabamaVirginia
NCGeorgia
Maryland
*III listSource: AIR Worldwide
Nearly 80% of Florida’s total insured
exposure is coastal
Value of Insured Residential Coastal Exposure (2004, $ Billions)
$512.1$306.6$302.2
$247.4$205.5
$88.0$65.1$64.5$60.0$60.0
$36.5$29.7$26.6$25.9$24.8$20.9
$5.4
$942.5
$0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000
FloridaNew York
MassachusettsTexas
New JerseyConnecticut
LouisianaS. Carolina
MaineVirginia
North CarolinaAlabamaGeorgia
DelawareRhode Island
NewMississippiMaryland
Source: AIR
Florida has nearly $1 trillion in insured
residential coastal exposure
Value of Insured Commercial Coastal Exposure (2004, $ Billions)
$994.8$437.8
$355.8$258.4
$199.4$121.3
$83.7$69.7
$52.6$45.3$43.3$39.4
$23.8$20.9$19.9$17.9$6.7
$1,389.6
$0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600
New YorkFlorida
TexasMassachusetts
New JerseyConnecticut
LouisianaS. Carolina
VirginiaMaine
North CarolinaGeorgia
AlabamaMississippi
New HampshireDelaware
Rhode IslandMaryland
Source: AIR
Florida has nearly $ trillion in insured residential commercial exposure
Florida for Sale: 24/7/365
Florida oceanfront real estate is advertised for
sale throughout the country year round,
like these ads from the New York Times and Wall Street Journal
New Condo Construction inSouth Miami Beach, 2007-2009
• Number of New Developments: 15
• Number of Individual Units: 2,111
• Avg. Price of Cheapest Unit: $940,333
• Avg. Price of Most Expensive Unit: $6,460,000
• Range: $395,000 - $16,000,000
• Overall Average Price per Unit: $3,700,167*
• Aggregate Property Value: At least $6 Billion*Based on average of high/low value for each of the 15 developments
Source: Insurance Information Institute from www.miamicondolifestyle.com accessed April 5, 2007.
Great Miami Hurricane of 1926: Hurricane Damage Adjusted for Inflation, Growth in Coastal
Properties, Real Growth in Property Values*
$0.76
$500
$130
$73
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
1926 1998 2005 2020
$ B
illi
ons
Repeat of Great Miami Hurricane of
1926 could cause $500B in damage by 2020 given current
demographic trends
*Includes damage form wind and storm surge but generally excludes inland flooding.Source: Roger Pielke and Christopher Landsea, December 2005; Insurance Info. Institute.
(Billions of 2004 Dollars)
Track of 1926 storm
Reasons for US P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969-2005
*Includes overstatement of assets.
Source: A.M. Best: P/C Impairments Hit Near-Term Lows Despite Surging Hurricane Activity, Special Report, Nov. 2005;
Catastrophe Losses8.6%
Alleged Fraud11.4%
Deficient Loss
Reserves/In-adequate Pricing62.8%
Affiliate Problems
8.6%
Rapid Growth
8.6%
2003-2005 1969-2005
Deficient reserves,
CAT losses are more important factors in
recent years
Reinsurance Failure3.5%
Rapid Growth16.5%
Misc.9.2%
Affiliate Problems
5.6%
Sig. Change in Business
4.6%
Deficient Loss
Reserves/In-adequate Pricing38.2%
Investment Problems*
7.3%
Alleged Fraud8.6%
Catastrophe Losses6.5%
P/C Insurer Impairments,1969-2006
815
127
11 934
913 12
199
16 14 1336
4931
3449 49
5460
5841
2915
1231
18 1949 50
4735
1813 15
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06
The number of impairments varies significantly over the p/c insurance cycle,
with peaks occurring well into hard markets
Source: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute
P/C Insurer Impairment Frequency vs. Combined Ratio, 1969-2006
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06
Co
mb
ined
Rat
io
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
Imp
airm
ent R
ate
Combined Ratio after DivP/C Impairment Frequency
Impairment rates are highly
correlated underwriting performance
Source: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute
2006 impairment rate was 0.43%, or 1-in-233 companies, half the 0.86% average since 1969
($10.60)
($0.21)
$0.69 $0.43 $0.86 $1.08 $1.23 $1.28 $1.43 $1.16 $1.47 $1.88
($10.39)
($3.73)
$2.75
($12)
($10)
($8)
($6)
($4)
($2)
$0
$2
$4
92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05E 06F
Underwriting Gain (Loss) in Florida Homeowners Insurance,
1992-2006E*
*2005 estimate by Insurance Information Institute based on historical loss and expense data for FL adjusted for estimated 2005 residential windstorm losses of $7.35B. 2006 estimate from Ins. Info. Inst.
$ B
illi
ons
Florida’s homeowners insurance market produces
small profits in most years and enormous losses in others
-$10.6-$10.8-$10.1-$9.7
-$8.8-$7.7
-$6.5-$5.2
-$3.8-$2.7
-$1.2
$0.7
-$9.7
-$13.4
-$10.7
($16)
($14)
($12)
($10)
($8)
($6)
($4)
($2)
$0
$2
92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05E 06F
Cumulative Underwriting Gain (Loss) in Florida Homeowners
Insurance, 1992-2006E*
$ B
illi
ons
It took insurers 11 years (1993-2003) to erase the UW loss associated with
Andrew, but the 4 hurricanes of 2004 erased the prior 7 years of profits &
2005 deepened the hole.
Regulator under US law has duty to allow rates
that are “fair,” “not excessive” and “not
unduly discriminatory.”Reality is that regulators
in CAT-prone states suppress rates.
*2005 estimate by Insurance Information Institute based on historical loss and expense data for FL adjusted for estimated 2005 residential windstorm losses of $7.35B. 2006 estimate from Ins. Info. Inst.
Rates of Return on Net Worth for Homeowners Ins: US vs. Florida
-1.7%
9.7%
-4.2%
3.6%
12.4%
5.4%
2.5%
5.4%3.8% 1.4%
-7.2%
35.7%
13.1%
31.5%28.6%29.3% 29.0%
31.3%
23.1%
35.4%
-16.1%
33.6%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Averages: 1993 to 2003
US HO Insurance = +2.8%; FL= +25.0%
Source: NAIC
Profits were earned most years after Andrew but before 2004
1993 - 2003
Rates of Return on Net Worth for Homeowners Ins: US vs. Florida
Source: NAIC; 200/6 US and FL estimates from the Insurance Information Institute.
-54.3%
-2.8%
-183.3%
-714.9%
-53.4%
36.0%
-800%
-700%
-600%
-500%
-400%
-300%
-200%
-100%
0%
100%
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06E
US Florida
Averages: 1990 to 2006E
US HO Insurance = -0.9%
FL HO Average = -36.5%
Andrew
4 Hurricanes
Wilma, Dennis, Katrina
1990 – 2006E
Major Residual Market Plan Estimated Deficits 2004/2005 (Millions of Dollars)
* MWUA est. deficit for 2005 comprises $545m in assessments plus $50m in Federal Aid.Source: Insurance Information Institute
-$516
-$1,425
-$1,770
-$954
-$595 *
-$2,000-$1,800-$1,600-$1,400-$1,200-$1,000
-$800-$600-$400-$200
$0
Florida HurricaneCatastrophe Fund
(FHCF) Florida Citizens Louisiana Citizens
Mississippi WindstormUnderwriting
Association (MWUA)
2004 2005
Hurricane Katrina pushed all of the residual market property plans in
affected states into deficits for 2005, following an already record hurricane loss year in 2004
CAPITAL & CAPACITY CONSIDERATIONS:
INSURERS MUST PUT LARGE AMOUNTS OF CAPITAL AT
RISK TO OFFER INSURANCE IN FLORIDA
$471 $523 $580
$644 $715
$794 $881
$978 $1,086
$1,206 $1,339
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
($ M
illi
ons)
Estimated New Insurance Capital Required to Support Growth in FL
Homeownership, 2005-2015*
*Estimate assumes 1:1 premium-to-surplus ratio and continuation of CAGR in direct premiums written of 11% (actual rate for period 1996-2003).Source: Insurance Information Institute
Florida needs to attract about $500 million in fresh homeowners insurance capital in 2005 just to keep pace with demographic trends, rising to more than $1 billion per year by 2013.
$471 $993
$1,573 $2,217
$2,932 $3,726
$4,607
$5,585
$6,672
$7,877
$9,216
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
$10,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
($ M
illi
ons)
Estimated Cumulative New Insurance Capital Required to Support Growth in
FL Homeownership, 2005-2015*
*Estimate assumes 1:1 premium-to-surplus ratio and continuation of CAGR in direct premiums written of 11% (actual rate for period 1996-2003).Source: Insurance Information Institute
Florida may need to attract more than $9 billion in new capital over the next decade, assuming recent demographic trends continue.
Excessive Catastrophe Exposure:Outcome of Economically & Politically
Rational Decision Process?• Property Owners
Make economically rational decision to live in disaster-prone areas Low cost of living, low real estate prices & rapid appreciation, low/no income tax, low
property tax, rapid job growth Government-run insurers (e.g., CPIC, NFIP) provide implicit subsidies by selling
insurance at below-market prices with few underwriting restrictions Government aid, tax deductions, litigation recovery for uninsured losses No fear of death and injury
• Local Zoning/Permitting Authorities Allowing development is economically & politically rational & fiscally sound Residential construction creates jobs, attracts wealth, increases tax receipts, stimulates
commercial construction & permanent jobs, develops infrastructure Increases local representation in state legislature & political influence Property and infrastructure damage costs shifted to others (state and federal taxpayers,
policyholders in unaffected areas)• Developers
Coastal development is a high-margin business Financial interest reduced to zero after sale
Source: Insurance Information Institute.
Excessive Catastrophe Exposure:Outcome of Economically & Politically
Rational Decision Process?• State Legislators
Loathe to pass laws negatively impacting development in home districts Local development benefits local economy and enhances political influence Rapid development lessens need for higher income and property taxes Can redistribute CAT losses to unaffected policyholders and taxpayers Can suppress insurance prices via state insurance regulator, suppress pricing and weaken
underwriting standards in state-run insurer & redistribute losses • Congressional Delegation
Home state development increases influence in Washington Political representation, share of federal expenditures
Loathe to pass laws harming development in home state/district Tax law promotes homeownership and actually produces supplemental benefits for property
owners in disaster-prone areas Large amounts of unbudgeted disaster aid easily authorized Tax burden largely borne by those outside CAT zone & those with no representation (children
& unborn)• President
Presidential disaster declarations and associated aid are increasing Political benefits to making declarations and distributing large amounts of aid Direct impact on favorability ratings & election outcomes Losses can be distributed to other areas and the unrepresented
Source: Insurance Information Institute.
Government-Run Insurers Lead to Poor Land Use/Design Decisions
• Government-run insurers (markets of last resort) serve as a vital safety valve after major market disruptions, but also serve as an enabler of unwise development…
• Government-run property insurers wash away market-based signals about relative risk
• Consequence is runaway development in disaster-prone areas• Government-run insurers:
Generally fail to charge actuarially sound rates Have weak underwriting standards Are thinly capitalized Can assess losses to policyholders other than their own Vulnerable to political pressure
• Inadequate premiums, insufficient capital and weak underwriting mean that most government plans, from Citizens Property Insurance Corporation to the National Flood Insurance Program operate with frequent deficits
Negative Outcomes from Flaws in Government-Run Insurers
• True risk associated with building on a particular piece of property is obscured
• Subsidies are generated leading to market distortions/inequities: Many thousands of homes likely would not have been built (or built differently) if
property owner obligated to pay actuarially sound rates CPIC assessments from Wilma will require grandmothers living in trailer parks on
fixed incomes in Gainesville to subsidize million dollar homes in Marco Island via assessment (surcharges).
• Serial rebuilding in disaster-prone areas is the norm• Property owners come to assume that the government rate is the
“fair” rate and object to moves to actuarially sound rates. • Government-run insurer can’t control its own exposure
Legislature mandates that CPIC offer coverage in most cases if no private insurer will offer coverage due to high risk, near certainty of destruction
No restrictions on value of property, so high-valued properties represent disproportionate share of potential loss
• Taxpayer Burden: NFIP borrowed $20B+ in 2005
Insurance-in-Force: CPIC vs. Voluntary (Private) Insurers
Private insurers accept relatively little wind
risk in South FL
That’s why operating in
the red is unavoidable
Average Annual Population Growth Rates of Atlantic States, 1960-1980 & 1980-2003
1.5%
3.2%
1.6%
0.5%
1.4%
0.7%
1.2%
1.1%
0.48%
1.31%
2.33%
1.93%
0.48%
1.11%
0.62%
1.49%
1.0%
0.9%
0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 3% 4%
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
North Carolina
United States
1960-1980
1980-2003
Source: US Census Bureau.
Average Annual Population Growth Rates of Atlantic States, 1960-1980 & 1980-2003
2.0%
0.9%
0.2%
1.3%
0.5%
1.4%
1.1%
2.33%
1.40%
0.66%
0.37%
1.19%
0.53%
1.35%
1.01%
3.2%
0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 3% 4%
Florida
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New York
South Carolina
Rhode Island
Virginia
United States
1960-1980
1980-2003
Source: US Census Bureau.
Average Annual Population Growth Rates of Gulf Coast States, 1960-1980 & 1980-2003
3.2%
1.2%
0.7%
1.8%
1.1%
0.61%
2.33%
0.28%
0.56%
1.84%
1.01%
0.8%
0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 3% 4%
Alabama
Florida
Louisiana
Mississippi
Texas
United States
1960-1980
1980-2003
Source: US Census Bureau.
Average Annual Population Growth Rates of Florida Coastal Cities, 1990-2003
1.8%
1.9%
2.1%
5.0%
3.0%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
1.5%
2.74%
1.43%
1.72%
1.36%
3.35%
2.29%
1.01%
1.53%
1.80%
1.38%
2.8%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6%
Cape Coral/Fort Myers
Daytona
Jacksonville
Miami/Ft. Lauderdale/Miami Beach
Naples/Marco Island
Orlando
Pensacola
Palm Bay/Melbourne
Sarasota/Bradenton
Tampa/St. Petersburg
1990-20002000-2003
Source: US Census Bureau.
3.7
8%
0.4
0%
2.0
8%
17
.74
%
9.7
1%
9.5
7%
21
.00
%
5.7
3% 1
0.0
5%
20
.50
%
10
.31
%
1.21
% 6.41
%
0.60
%
1.26
% 5.90
% 9.52
%
28
.40
%
0AL FL LA MS TX US
1980-1990 1990-2000 2000-2003
State Population Growth Rates by Decade, Gulf Coast, 1980-2003
Source: Statistical Abstract of the United States, US Census Bureau
Florida has posted the fastest growth of any Gulf Coast state since 1980, driving
its exposure to hurricane loss
Projected Percent Population Growth of Atlantic States, 2003-2030
24.5%
12.6%
1.5%
21.6%
6.9%
28.5%
20.9%
52.2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Florida
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New York
South Carolina
Rhode Island
Virginia
United States
Source: US Census Bureau.
Florida is expected to grow faster than any Atlantic Coast state through 2030, driving its exposure
to hurricane loss still higher
Projected Percent Population Growth of Atlantic States, 2003-2030
21.4%
52.2%
32.5%
8.6%
24.3%
7.7%
37.5%
20.9%
5.8%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
North Carolina
United States
Source: US Census Bureau.
Florida is expected to grow faster than any Atlantic Coast state through 2030, driving its exposure
to hurricane loss still higher
Projected Percent Population Growth of Gulf Coast States, 2003-2030
52.2%
6.6%
7.1%
41.0%
20.9%
8.0%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Alabama
Florida
Louisiana
Mississippi
Texas
United States
Source: US Census Bureau.
Florida is expected to grow faster than any Gulf Coast state through
2030, driving its exposure to hurricane loss still higher
18.22%
23.88%
38.37%
33.36%
0Atlantic Coast Gulf Coast
2003 2030
Percent of Atlantic & Gulf Coast Populations Living in FL, 2003 and
2030
Source: US Census Bureau
The proportion of Atlantic and Gulf coast population living in FL will
continue to swell in the decades ahead
Successful Tools for Controlling Hurricane Exposure
• Strengthened building codes• Stringent enforcement of building codes• Fortified home programs• Insurance rates based on sound actuarial
principles (risk-based rates that are not government controlled); Works for commercial insurers
• Disciplined underwriting• Removing impediments to capital flows• Incentives to adopt mitigation• Forcing communities to consider and take a
larger stake in their catastrophe exposureSource: Insurance Information Institute
Unsuccessful Tools for Controlling Hurricane Exposure
• Insurance rates that are not actuarially sound (i.e., don’t reflect true risk)
• Political interference in rate process• Inadequate underwriting controls• Subsidies
Intra-state (policyholders/taxpayers)US Taxpayer
• Voluntary flood coverage• Litigation
Source: Insurance Information Institute
Faux Pas & Fatal Flaws in Florida’s Approach to Managing CAT Risk
FAUX PAS• Governor has unnecessarily, unjustifiably and counterproductively
vilified private insurers and reinsurers Insurers want to find ways to cover the majority of hurricane-exposed property
in FL and will do so if given the opportunity Insurers and capital markets can be partners in finding lasting and innovative
solutions to Florida’s permanent hurricane problem
• Changes to market are arbitrary, capricious and punitive and violate virtually all laws of modern economics, finance, statistics and actuarial science
• Meteorological and actuarial reality have been forced to take a back seat to politics
• Political risk to insurers now exceeds hurricane risk• Bottom Line: Residents of Florida are Now the Most Financially
Exposed People on Earth to Catastrophic Risk
FATAL FLAWS• Virtually no diversification
Basically monoline, single state, single risk• No true spread of risk
Citizens market share is concentrated in riskiest areas FHCF is Citizen’s sole reinsurer; FHCF doesn’t access retrocessional mkt.
• Rates in Citizens not even remotely close to actuarially sound• Citizens & FHCF are too thinly capitalized• Losses are substantially funded via post-event assessment• Plants seeds of animosity between non-coastal & coastal dwellers
(within state and with non-coastal states) Largest beneficiaries are residents of southeast coast
• Plan will alienate business community (liability lines assessed)• Homeowners insurance has been converted into a regressive income
and wealth transfer mechanism• May have harmed chances for Fed Natural Catastrophe Fund• Little done to address true risk of hurricanes
Faux Pas & Fatal Flaws in Florida’s Approach to Managing CAT Risk
Problem Issues• Local control of land use and permitting
creates significant incentive problemsBenefits accrue locally while many costs can be
redistributed to others via taxes, insurance and aid
• Prospect of government aid reinforces unsound building and location decisions
• States don’t want to raise taxes to pay for mitigation/prevention even if state is sole beneficiaryE.g., NO levees; Beach replenishment
Source: Insurance Information Institute
Pre- vs. Post-Event in FL for 2007 Hurricane Season
$12.
4
$15.
0
$17.
6
$25.
8
$9.9
$14.
6
$24.
1
$31.
4
$34.
5
$37.
4
$54.
2
$10.9$10.4$10.1$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
1-in-20 1-in-30 1-in-50 1-in-70 1-in-85 1-in-100 1-in-250
Pre-Event Funding Post-Event Funding (Assessments & Bonds)
Bil
lion
s
Total = $20.0 Billion
Notes: Pre-event funding includes funds available to Citizens, FHCF and private carriers plus contingent funding available through private reinsurance to pay claims in 2007. Post-event funding is on a present value basis and does not includefinancing costs. Probabilities are expressed as “odds of a single storm of this magnitude or greater happening in 2007.”Source: Tillinghast Towers Perrin, Study of Recent Legislative Changes to Florida’s Property Insurance Mechanisms, 3/07.
$35.0B
$25.0B
$43.8B $49.5B
$55.0B
$80.0BThere is a very significant likelihood of major, multi-year assessments in 2007
Per Household Savings vs. Long-Term Costs of FL Legislation for
2007 Hurricane Season
$3
,50
3
$4
,41
6
$4
,69
4
$4
,95
6
$7
,85
5
$2
,52
8
$3
,21
9
$3
,49
7
$3
,75
2
$6
,11
6
$265$1,005 $1,486
$1,066$721
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
Savings 1-in-20 1-in-30 1-in-50 1-in-70 1-in-85 1-in-100 1-in-250
Direct Costs Indirect Costs
Bil
lion
s
Total = $1,726
Notes: Assumes average homeowners insurance premium of $1300 in 2007. Savings for 2007 reflects 24.3% savings on hurricane costs, assumed to be 63% of premium. Savings based on statewide OIR estimate. Actual savings may be less.Direct costs include assessments paid by policyholders on home and personal auto premiums. Indirect costs includeassessments on commercial lines passed on to policyholders via higher prices. Amounts are in nominal dollars, or the totalcost of borrowing including finance charges over the term of the bond. Source: Tillinghast Towers Perrin, Study of Recent Legislative Changes to Florida’s Property Insurance Mechanisms, 3/07.
$2,552
$6,031 $7,635
$8,191 $8,708
$13,971
Savings dwarfed by potential costs under
most scenarios
Average Annual Assessment per Household, 1-in-100 Year Event in 2007
Source: Tillinghast Towers Perrin, Study of Recent Legislative Changes to Florida’s Property Insurance Mechanisms, 3/07.
The average Florida household will pay $8,699 over 30 years in assessments if a 1-in-100 year
event strikes in 2007. Assessments could rise if additional storms hit
in 2007 or beyond.
Savings vs. Costs by Region: Neither Equitable nor Proportionate
TALLAHASSEEAverage Savings: $20
Cost of 1-in-30 Storm: $2,000Cost is 100 times avg. savings
TAMPAAverage Savings: $100
Cost of 1-in-30 Storm: $2,300Cost is 23 times avg. savings
ORLANDO
Average Savings: $30
Cost of 1-in-30 Storm: $2,075
Cost is 69 times avg. savings
MIAMI
Average Savings: $1,120
Cost of 1-in-30 Storm: $3,375
Cost is 3 times avg. savings
STATEWIDE AVERAGEAverage Savings: $265
Cost of 1-in-30 Storm: $2,550Cost is 10 times avg. savings
Source: Tillinghast Towers Perrin, Study of Recent Legislative Changes to Florida’s Property Insurance Mechanisms, 3/07.
NAIC’s Comprehensive National Catastrophe Plan
• Proposes Layered Approach to Risk• Layer 1: Maximize resources of private
insurance & reinsurance industry Includes “All Perils” Policy Encourage Mitigation Create Meaningful, Forward-Looking Reserves
• Layer 2: Establishes system of state catastrophe funds (like FHCF)
• Layer 3: Federal Catastrophe Reinsurance Mechanism
Source: Insurance Information Institute
Comprehensive National Catastrophe Plan Schematic
Personal Disaster Account
Private Insurance
State Regional Catastrophe Fund
National Catastrophe Contract Program
Source: NAIC, Natural Catastrophe Risk: Creating a Comprehensive National Plan, Dec. 1, 2005; Insurance Information. Inst.
State Attachment
1:50 Event
1:500 Event
Objectives of NAIC’s Comprehensive National Catastrophe Plan
• Should Promote Personal Responsibility Among Policyholders
• Supports Reasonable Building Codes, Development Plans & Other Mitigation Tools
• Maximize the Risk Bearing Capacity of the Private Markets
• Should Provide Quantifiable Risk Management to the Federal Government
Source: NAIC, Natural Catastrophe Risk: Creating a Comprehensive National Plan, Dec. 1, 2005; Insurance Information. Inst.
Legislation has been introduced and ideas
espoused by ProtectingAmerica.org will likely get a more
thorough airing in 2007/8
Florida Citizens Exposure to Loss (Billions of Dollars)
Source: PIPSO; Insurance Information Institute
408.8
$210.6$206.7$195.5
$154.6
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Exposure to loss in Florida Citizens nearly doubled in 2006
Major Residual Market Plan Estimated Deficits 2004/2005 (Millions of Dollars)
* MWUA est. deficit for 2005 comprises $545m in assessments plus $50m in Federal Aid.Source: Insurance Information Institute
-$516
-$1,425
-$1,770
-$954
-$595 *
-$2,000-$1,800-$1,600-$1,400-$1,200-$1,000
-$800-$600-$400-$200
$0
Florida HurricaneCatastrophe Fund
(FHCF) Florida Citizens Louisiana Citizens
Mississippi WindstormUnderwriting
Association (MWUA)
2004 2005
Hurricane Katrina pushed all of the residual market property plans in
affected states into deficits for 2005, following an already record hurricane loss year in 2004
Recommendations for Controlling Hurricane Exposure
• Raise public awareness of riskMandatory risk disclosure in all residential real estate transactionsRequire signed waivers if decline flood coverage that also waive rights
to any and all disaster aid, orMandate flood coverage
• Continue to strengthen & enforce of building codes• Allow markets to determine all property insurance rates
Role of state focused on difficult-to-insure or income issues• Increase incentives to mitigate• Require state-run insurer to charge actuarially sound rates
and limit high value exposure• Require communities/counties to a financial stake in their
catastrophe exposureReimburse disaster aid to state/federal government