integra lifesciences corp 483 8-25-11 dt - food and …fdagov...ni\me street address integra...

9
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION DISTRICT ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER 10 Waterview Blvd., 3rd Floor Parsippany, NJ 07054 (973) 331-4900 Fax: (973) 331-4969 Industry Information: DATE(S) OF INSPECTION 07/22 /20 11 - 0 8/25/201 1* FE! NUMBER 1121308 NAME AND Till£ OF INDIVIDUAL TO WHOM REPORT ISSUED TO: John Kovacevich, Plant Manager FIRM NAME Integra LifeSciences Corp STREET ADDRESS 105 Mo rgan Ln CITY, STATE. ZIP CODE. COUNTRY Plainsbo ro, NJ 08536-3339 TYPE ESTABUSHMENT INSPECTED Medica l Device Manuf acturer This document lists observations made by the FDA representative(s) during the inspection of your facility. They are inspectional observations, and do not represent a final Agency determination regarding your compliance. If you have an objection regar ding an observation, or have implemented, or plan to implement, corrective action in response to an observation, ou may discuss the ob jection or action with the FDA representative(s) during the inspection or submit this information to FDA at the address above. If you have any questions, please contact FDA at the phone number and address above. The observati ns noted in th;s Form FDA-483 are not an c::xh austive /isti1rg of objectionable conditions. Under the law, your finn is respons ible for conducting internal self-audits to identify an d co"ect and all violations of the quality system requirements. DURING AN INSPECnoN OF YOUR ARM WE OBSERVED: Your firm has manufactured Class II (e. g. , NeuraGen Nerve Guide, TenoG/ide) and Class li/ (Integra ar tificial slcin pr oducts [e.g, Derma l Ref(e nerati on Template/, Absorab/e Collaf(en products) medical devices under the fo/lowifJf( cond itions. Pr odu ction and Pr ocess Controls (P&PO - OBSERVATION 1 Buildings are not of suitable design to perform necessary operations. On June 15, 2009, your firm identified visible mold in the equipment storage area (Room and the closet housing your Deionized Ultra-filtered Wa t er system (R oom directly adjacent to your ISO Class 7 Clean Room. The mold was also visibly identified in the Mechanical Room (Room that houses the Water for Injection (WFD water system. The third party environmental company, which was hi red by your firm to remediate the mold in these areas, identified several mold types in an Industri al Hygiene Report for Mold Exposure dated July 2009. Mold types identified in the results of this report include Aspergillus/Penicillium-like, Ascospores, Basidi ospores, Stachybotrys, Ulocladium and other/unidentified. Th is report went on to state that employees in these areas are exposed to mold, and that the presence of the mold could compromise the integrity of the final product manufactured at the facility. Your ftrm continued to identify mold throughout your 105 Morgan Lane manufacturing facility from June 15, 2009 to th e present. The mold assessment and remediation activities are documented by your firm in Quality Plans (QP), and you have generated seventeen QPs to date. During that time your firm continued to manuf acture, release and di tribute approximately lots of various Integra products and products contract manufactured for your customers. EMf't.CJYEElS) ATE <SSUED SIGNATIJRE . SEE REVERSE D Loretta N emchik , Inves t iga t or Me r edith L. Sher idan, Investigator OF THIS PAGE 1/) 'fltJ/t t 08 /25/ 2011 FOR. l\1 FDA 413 (09188) I'RE'< 101.1S EDITION OBSOl.ETE INSPEcnONAL OBSERVATIONS PAGE I Of 9PAGES ..o (\ , (b) (4) (b) (4) (b) (4) (b) (4)

Upload: vomien

Post on 01-May-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION

DISTRICT ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER

10 Waterview Blvd., 3rd Floor Parsippany, NJ 07054 (973) 331-4900 Fax: (973) 331-4969 Industry Information: v~.fda.gov/oc/industry

DA TE(S) OF INSPECTION

07/22 /2011 - 08/25/201 1* FE! NUMBER

1121308

NAME AND Till£ OF INDIVIDUAL TO WHOM REPORT ISSUED

TO: John Kovacevich, Plant Manager FIRM NAME

Integra LifeSciences Corp STREET ADDRESS

105 Morgan Ln CITY, STATE. ZIP CODE. COUNTRY

Plainsbo ro, NJ 08536-3339 TYPE ESTABUSHMENT INSPECTED

Medical Device Manufacturer

This document lists observations made by the FDA representative(s) during the inspection of your facility. They are inspectional observations, and do not represent a final Agency determination regarding your compliance. If you have an objection regarding an observation, or have implemented, or plan to implement, corrective action in response to an observation, ou may discuss the objection or action with the FDA representative(s) during the inspection or submit this information to FDA at the address above. If you have any questions, please contact FDA at the phone number and address above.

The observati ns noted in th;s Form FDA-483 are not an c::xhaustive /isti1rg of objectionable conditions. Under the law, your finn is responsible for conducting internal self-audits to identify and co"ect 01~ and all violations of the quality system requirements.

DURING AN INSPECnoN OF YOUR ARM WE OBSERVED:

Your firm has manufactured Class II (e.g. , NeuraGen Nerve Guide, TenoG/ide) and Class li/ (Integra artificial slcin products [e.g, Dermal Ref(eneration Template/, Absorab/e Collaf(en products) medical devices under the fo/lowifJf( conditions.

Production and Process Controls (P&PO -

OBSERVATION 1

Buildings are not of suitable design to perform necessary operations.

On June 15, 2009, your firm identified visible mold in the equipment storage area (Room and the closet housing your Deionized Ultra-filtered Water system (Room directly adjacent to your ISO Class 7 Clean Room. The mold was also visibly identified in the Mechanical Room (Room that houses the Water for Injection (WFD water system.

The third party environmental company, which was hired by your firm to remediate the mold in these areas, identified several mold types in an Industrial Hygiene Report for Mold Exposure dated July 2009. Mold types identified in the results of this report include Aspergillus/Penicillium-like, Ascospores, Basidiospores, Stachybotrys, Ulocladium and other/unidentified. This report went on to state that employees in these areas are exposed to mold, and that the presence of the mold could compromise the integrity of the final product manufactured at the facility.

Your ftrm continued to identify mold throughout your 105 Morgan Lane manufacturing facility from June 15, 2009 to the present. The mold assessment and remediation activities are documented by your firm in Quality Plans (QP), and you have generated seventeen QPs to date. During that time your firm continued to manufacture, release and di tribute approximately

lots of various Integra products and products contract manufactured for your customers.

EMf't.CJYEElS) ATE <SSUED SIGNATIJRE .

SEE REVERSE ~~ 0~~~

~ D

Loretta Nemchik , Inves t igat or ~C Me r edith L. Sheridan, Investigator OF THIS PAGE 1/) 'fltJ/t t ~~ 08 / 2 5 / 2011

FOR.l\1 FDA 413 (09188) I'RE'<101.1S EDITION OBSOl.ETE INSPEcnONAL OBSERVATIONS PAGE I Of 9PAGES

..o (\ ,

(b) (4)(b) (4)

(b) (4)

(b) (4)

(b

DEPARTMENT OF REALm AND HUMAN SERVICES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION

DISTRICT ADDRESS AND PHOOE NUMBER DA TE(S) OF INSPECTION

10 Waterview Blvd., 3rd Floo r 07 /22 /2 011 - 08/25/ 20 11* Parsippany, NJ 07054 FE! NUMBER

(973) 331-4900 Fax: (973) 331-4969 1121308 Industry Information: www.fda.gov/oc/industry NAME AND TITLE OF INOi\IICltJAL TO WHOM REPORT ISSUED

TO: John Kovacevich, Plant Manager FIRM NAME STREET AOORESS

Integra LifeSciences Corp 105 Morgan Ln ClTY, STATE ZIP CQDE, COUNTRY TYPE ESTABUSHMENT INSPEC1ED

Plainsbo ro, NJ 08536-3339 Medical Device Manu facturer

OBSERVATION 2

A process whose results cannot be fully verified by subsequent inspection and test has not been adequately validated according to established procedures.

A. CAP A L2307 was initiated to review the adequacy of cleaning validations and cleaning procedures associated with multiple pieces of equipment used in the manufacturing of Integra skin and medical products. As a result of this review a document was submitted to firm management on 4/30/10 that identifies deficiencies associated with multiple cleaning validations. Although a re-evaluation of the cleaning program by an outside contractor was done in April2011 and a risk assessment was done by your firm in May 2011, your firm continued to use this equipment before these activities were completed.

For example, the review identified that the cleaning validation for the Integra Mixing Tanks ( was inadequate because the validation states that the used in the cleaning procedure completely accesses all inner areas of the tanks even though n area coverage test was done. The Integra Mixing Tanks were used in the manufacture ol lot #105000210455 on 2/23/11 and lot #105000209549 on 2/14/ 11. at #105000210455 was used in Integra Bilayer Matrix Wound Dressing lot #s 105A00212334, 105800212334, 105A00212335 and 105800212335; and Integra Meshed Bilayer Matrix Wound Dressing lot #s 105A00212336 and 105A00212337.lot #105000209549 was used in Integra Matrix Wound Dressing lot #s I05A00210458, 105B00210458, 105A00210652, 105800210652, 105A00210653 and 105800210653; and Integra Meshed Bilayer Matrix Wound Dressing lot #105A00210459. As of the temporary closure of the Integra Suite in July of2011 for remediation/renovation, no new cleaning validation for the Integra Mixing Tanks has been performed.

B. Your firm's validation for the "WFI Distribution System In-line Analyzer " which is used to monitor TOC, pH, flow and conductivity on your WFI water system, does not include a Performance Qualification. Your firm explained this is because the full function of the instrument is to transmit information to a

recorder The validation for the ecorder has not been executed to date. Data from this unvalidated recorder was collected and analyzed from 1/20 11-4/201 1 on a memo dated 4/21 /20 11, to support the investigation and release of quarantined products in Non Conforming Report #0126.

This is a repeat observation from the previous establishment inspection.

and-

OBSERVATION 3

Procedures to control environmental conditions have not been adequately established.

A. Your environmental control procedures as written allow for an unclear amount of re-sampling to be conducted when an Out of Specification (OOS) result is received. For Example:

1) SOP G-63 1, Rev. 16, Microbiological and Chemical Analysis of Process Water, under section 5 .5.3 states any OOS result is to be re-sampled. The procedure goes on to stat is required to confirm the first re-\ampling results,

EMPI.OYEE(S) SIGNATURE

~ DATE ISSUED

SEE REVERSE Loretta Nemc hi k, Investigato r

OF THIS PAGE Meredith L. Sherida n, Inves tigator f(J1.e:: 08/25/ 2011

FORM FDA 413 (09JG8) r REVJOUS EDITION OBSOL£TE INSPECTIONAL OBSERVATIONS PAGE 2 Of 9 PAGES

(b) (4)(b) (4)

(b) (4)(b) (4) (b) (4) (b) (4)

(b) (4)

(b) (4) (b) (4)

(b) (4) (b) (4)

(b) (4)

DISTRICT ADDRESS ANO PHONE NUMBER

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FOOD AND DRUG ADMlNISTRA TION

DATE(S) OF INSPECTION

1 0 Waterview Blvd., 3rd Floo r Parsippany, NJ 07054

07 /22/2 01 1 - 08 /25/20 11* FEINUMBER

(973 ) 331-4900 Fax: (973) 331-4969 1121 308 Industry Information: www.fda.gov/oc /industry NAME AND nTl£ OF INDIVIDUAL TO WHOM REP<::RT" ISSU£0

TO: John Kovacevich, Pl ant Mana g e r ARM NI\ME STREET ADDRESS

Integra LifeSciences Corp 105 Morgan Ln CITY, STATE, ZIP COOE, COUNTRY TYPE EST!IBUSHMENT INSPECTED

Plainsboro, NJ 08 536-3339 Medical Device Manufacturer

and an Out of Specification investigation is to be opened under SOP MB-026, Rev. 7, Microbiology Out of Specification Investigation Procedure. Attachment 3 ofMB-026, Rev. 7 is the flow chart to follow for LAL-Water OOS which statesmore re-samples are to be collected.

2) SOP MB-001, Rev. 23, Microbiological Analysis ofWFI and Pure Steam, states an alert level result is to b re-sampled, then an OOS investigation is initiated under MB-026, Rev. 7. The procedure goes on to state to collect a reo-sample of the affected port fo then initiate an OOS investigation per SOP MB-026, Rev. 7. Attachment 1 ofMB-026, Rev. 7 is the flow chart for Environmental Monitoring which states to ''Resample as per SOP" .

3) SOP 601, Rev. 20, Environmental Monitoring Plan for the Integra Manufacturing Area, states when results exceed alert levels the site is to be re--sampled Then an investigation is to be opened per SOP MB-026, Rev 7. Attachment 1 of MB-026, Rev. 7 is the flow chart for Environmental Monitoring which states to "Resample as per SOP" .

4) SOP G-523, Rev. 30, Microbiological Monitoring of the Medical Products Manufacturing Clean Areas, states results exceeding alert levels are to be documented on an Alert/Action Notification form which is Attachment 9 ofMB-026, Rev. 7. The form allows fo e-sampling results. The procedure then states to resample the site if the re-samples exceed alert levels then an investigation is to be opened under MB-026, Rev 7 . Attachment 1 ofMB-026, Rev. 7 is the flow chart for Environmental Monitoring, which states to "Resample as per SOP".

B. Your firm's Cleanroom Maintenance Procedure (SOP #823, Rev 3) requires a HEPA filter velocity verification to be done for the Integra Suite, the site of the final manufacturing steps of the Integra artificial skin products. This

requirement became effective 5/4/11 . Although your Integra Suite was operating in May 2011 and June 2011, the HEPA filter velocity_ verification was not performed. The Integra Suite was shutdown in July_ 2011 for remediation/renovation.

OBSERVATION 4

Procedures that define the responsibility for review and the authority for the disposition of nonconforming product have not been adequately established.

A. Your procedure, SOP G-539, Rev. 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20, Nonconforming Material and Processes, states an investigation and root cause analysis is to be conducted to determine the root cause of the problem. The procedure goes on toreference SOP-QA-041, Rev. 1, Root Cause Analysis Investigation. Under section 5.1 of SOP QA-041 it states that infonnation should be collected consisting of conditions before, during and after the occurrence, including environmental factors. Y ur firm identified mold contamination in several areas of your facility beginning in June 2009 to the present, however this exist ing environmental condition is not considered in the investigation documentation of the Non Conforming Reports (NCR) #2218 dated 11/ i/20 10, 2014 dated 3/23/2010 and 0126 dated 4119/2011, which were initiated when environmental monitoring results exceeded alert/action limits for mold.

B. NCR#2044 refers to the Water for Injection (WFI) water system sanitizat ion loop failure. The dates listed on the NCR are listed as 4/30/2010, 5/01/2010, and 5/02/2010. The investigation of the occurrence does not including any supporting documentation as required in procedure SOP G-539, Rev. 15 Section 5.3.2.2. Review of the chart paper from the temperature recorder on the WFI system for the time frame revealed that the chart paper became jammed a\d did not record

EMPLOYEE(S) SIGNATURE \ ~ ,_) DATE ISSUED

SEE REVERSE Loretta Nernchi k, Inve stigator \r OF THIS PAGE Meredith L . Sheridan, Investigator ~ 08 / 2 5/ 2011

FORM IIDA 483 (09101) PREVIOUS EDm ON OBSCUTE INSPECilONAL OBSERVATIONS PAGE 30F9PAGES

(b) (4)

(b) (4)

(b) (4)

(b) (4)

(b) (4) (b) (4)

(b) (4)

SEE REVERSE OF THIS PAGE

FORM FDA 483 (09108)

EMPLOYEE(S) SIGNATURE

Loret t a Neroc h i k, I nvestigator Mer e di th L. Sh eridan, I nve s tigato r

PllE\~OUS EDlTION OBSOLETE INSPEcnONAL OBSERVATIONS

08/25/2011

PAGE 4 01'9 PAGES

DISTRICT ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION

OATE(S) OF INSPECTION

10 Waterview Blvd., 3rd Floor Parsippany, NJ 07 05 4

07/ 22/ 2 011 - 08 / 25/2 01 1* FEI NUMBER

(973) 331-4900 Fax: (973 ) 331-4 96 9 1121308 Industry Information: www.fda.gov/oc/industry NAME AND ffiLE OF INDIVIDUAL TO WHOM REPORT ISSUED

TO: John Kovacevich, Plant Manager FIRM NAME STRE.ET ADDRESS

Integra LifeSc iences Corp 105 Morgan Ln ~am~~. S~TA~~~.~ZIPO,~~~. ~~UN~ffi~Y~~~~~~~----------------~~~EST~~~L~IS~H~~NT~INSP~ECTE~O------------------------------

Plainsboro, NJ 0853 6- 3 339 Medica l Device Manufacturer

the sanitization loop on 4/28/2010, another paper jam occurred on 4/29/2010, and a third paper jam and a possible power outage occurred on 4/30/20 I 0, during the sanitization loop. Due to the incorrect dates recorded on the NCR not all lots were adequately quarantined. For example, the quarantine lots listed in the NCR does not include Finished Good Lot#B0017988l, Master Graft Matrix which was made from .ot#I05000177800, which was manufactured on 4/30/2010.

1) NCR#2044 refers to the Water for Injection (WFI) water system sanitization loop failure on 4/30/20 I 0, 5101/20 10, and 5/02/20 I 0. NCR#2084 refers to the Water for Injection (WFI) water system sanitization loop failure on 6/08/20 I 0, 6/09/2010, and 6/10/2010. Though the investigation was assigned to the same individual, and the NCRs share the exact same background information, investigation information and Product/Process disposition and justification, they are written in two different handwritings and have two different root causes, neither of which contains supporting documentation as required in SOP-539 Rev. 15 and 16.

C. SOP-539, Rev. 20, in section 4 .6 states NCRS are to be completed within business days of initiation According to the NCR index provided by your firm over twenty NCRs are currently overdue.

OBSERVATION 5

Schedules for the adjustment, cleaning, and other maintenance of equipment have not been adequately established.

Although your current Preventive Maintenance Schedule for EQuipment and Svstems procedure (#432, Rev 19, Effective 4/3/11) identifies a grace period for preventive maintenance activities, it does not identify any grace period fo activities. The Cleanroom Maintenance Procedure in effect at the initiation of this inspection ( #823, Rev 3) requires PM for the Medical Manufacturing area. nspections were due on 5/25/11, 6/8/11 and 8/4/11 but were not done until 5/31/11 (6 days beyond due date), 6/19/11 (II days beyond due date) and 8/8/11 (4 days beyond due date) respectively.

Corrective & Preventive Actions

OBSERVATION 6

Complaints representing events that are MDR reportable were not promptly reviewed, evaluated. and investigated by a designated individual.

Specifically, oftbe approximately 19 complaints containing MDR reportable events reviewed during this inspection 5 were not promptly investigated by your manufacturing site.

For example -

I) Complaint PR ID 34424 was received on 12/01/10 and a request for an investigation was made on 12/6/ 10. The complaint states that the packaging of a medicai device (Bilayer Matrix Wound Dressing, lot # I 05AOO 189537) manufactured by your firm contained brown stains and that a tiny hole was found in the inner package compromising the integrity and sterility of

(b) (4)

(b) (4)

(b) (4)(b) (4)

(b) (4)(b)( )

SEE REVERSE OF THIS PAGE

FORM rnA 413 (89/0S)

EMP!.OYEE(Sl SIGNATURE

Loretta Nemchi k , Investiga t o r Mer e d ith L. She ridan , Investiga to r

VREVlOUS EDm ON OBSOLETE INSPECTIONAL OBSERVATIONS

I DATE ISSUED

08/ 2 5 / 2011

!' AGE S OF 9 PAGES

DISTRICT ~DORESS AND PHONE NUMBER

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION

DATE(S) OF li'ISPECTIQI;

10 Waterview Blvd., 3rd Floor Parsippany, NJ 07 054

07 /22/2011 - 08 / 25/201 1* FE! NUMBER

(97 3) 331-4900 Fax: (973) 331-4969 11 2 1308 Industry Inf ormat i on: www.fda.gov/oc/industry NAME AND TITl.E OF INDIVIDUAL TO WHOM REPORT ISSUED

TO: J ohn Kovacevich, Plant Manager FIRM NAME STREET ADDRESS

Integra LifeScienc es Corp 1 05 Morgan Ln CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE, COUNTRY TYPE ESTABliSHMENT INSPECTED

Plainsbo r o , NJ 08536-333 9 Medic a l Device Manufacturer

the product. The device was not used. A Medical Device Report (MDR #1121308-2010-00031) was filed on 12/29/ IO. Although the Investigation Plan (DHR. review, customer comment review, inspect returned product, review complaint trend) was prepared on 12/7/10, no investigation was done by your firm untill/19/l1wh.ich was approximately 49 days after complaint receipt and 44 days after the request for an investigation was made.

2) Complaint PR ID 45523 was received on 5/26/ 11 and a request for an investigation was made on 5/27/11 . The complaint states that a medical device (NeuraGen Nerve Guide, lot #1090766) manufactured by your firm was used in a patient. The patient later experienced a foreign body reaction at the implantation site. A Medical Device Report (MDR # 1121308-2011-000 18) was filed on 6115/11 . Although the Investigation Plan (DHR review, customer comment review, inspect returned product, review complaint trend) was prepared on 6/ 1/11, no investigation was done by your firm until 7/8/ 11 which was approximately 43 days after complaint receipt and 42 days after the request for an investigation was made.

3) Complaint PR ID 46035 was received on 6/3/11 and a request for an investigation was made on 6/7/11. The complaint states that a medical device (TenoGiide, lot #105A00193691) manufactured by your firm was used in a patient during a removal of a ganglion cyst. The patient later required revision surgery to remove a soft tissue nodule that had formed at the revision site. A Medical Device Report (MDR #1121308-2011-00019) was filed on 6/21/11. Although the Investigation Plan (DHR review, customer comment review, inspect returned product, review complaint trend) was prepared on 6/9/ 11, no investigation was done by your firm until 7/22/ 11 which was approximately 49 days after complaint receipt and 45 days after the request for an investigation was made.

4) Complaint PR ID 46 152 was received on 6/9/ 11 and a request for an investigation was made on the same day. The complaint states that the packaging of a medical device (Integra Dermal Regeneration Template, lot# 105C00202206) manufactured by your firm contained stains and that a crack was found on the inner package compromising the integrity and sterility of the product. The device was not used. A Medical Device Report (MDR #1121308-2011-00022) was filed on 6/2811 1. Although the Investigation Plan (DHR review, customer comment review, inspect returned product< review complaint trend) was prepared on 6/9/11, no investigation was done by your firm until 7/21 /11 which was approximately 4 2 days after complaint receipt and the request for an investigation was made.

5) Complaint PR ID 45844 was received on 5/24111 and a request for an investigation was made on 6/7/11 . The complaint states that the inside packaging of a medical device (lntegra Dermal Regeneration Template, lot #I 05B001658 3) manufactured by your firm was stained brown where it should have been sterile. The device was not used. A Medical Device Report (MDR #1121308-2011-00026) was filed on 7/5/11. Although the Investigation Plan (DHR review, customer comment review, inspect returned product, review complaint trend) was prepared on 6/9/1 1, no investigation was done by your firm until 7/2l/l l which was approximately 58 days after complaint receipt and 44 days after the request for an investigation was made.

This is a repeat observation from the previous establishment inspection.

DISTRICT ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION

DA TE(S) OF INSPECTION

10 Waterview Blvd . , 3rd Floo r Parsippany, NJ 0705 4

07/22/20 11 - 08/ 25/2 011* FE! NUMBER

(973) 331-4900 Fax: (973 ) 331-4969 112130 8 Indus t ry Info rmation : www.fda.gov/oc/industry NAME "NO TITI..E OF INOIVlDUAL TO WHOM REPORT ISSuED

TO: J o hn Kovac evich, Plant Manager ARM NAME STREET ADDRESS

Integra LifeSciences Corp 1 05 Mo rgan Ln CITY, STATE. ZIP CODE, COUNTRY TYPE ESTABLISHMENT INSPECTED

Plainsbo ro, NJ 08 536-3339 Medical Device Manufacturer

EMPLOYEE(S) SIGNA TLRE \ \ I ) OA TE lSSUED

SEE REVERSE Lore tta Nemc hik , I n vestigato r o/" OF THIS PAGE Meredith L. Sheri da n, I nvestigato r /ll}"g 08/25/2011

FOre-1 FDA 483 (09101) FREVIOUS EDITION OBSOLETE INSPECUONAL OBSERVATIONS PAGE 6 OF 9 PAGES

OBSERVATION 7

An MDR report was not submitted within 30 days of receiving or otherwise becoming aware of information that reasonably suggests that a marketed device has malfunctioned and would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur.

For example, of the approximately 19 complaints classified as MDR reportable events reviewed during this inspection, 3 events were not reported to FDA within 30 days of receipt.

Specifically-

I) Integra LifeSciences (ll.,S) was made aware of Complaint PR ID 22089 on 4/22/10. The complaint states that when the sales representative checked the stock mold was found on the foil package containing Integra Dermal Regeneration Template,lot # 105BZ0143276. The product was not used on a patient. The complaint was evaluated for MDR reporting on 4/22/10 and a MedWatch (MDR 1121308-2010-00013) notification was sent to FDA on 5/27/10, approximately 35 days after ILS was made aware of the complaint.

2) ILS was made aware of Complaint PR ID 24121 on 5/31/10. The complaint states that the foil package containing Integra Dermal Regeneration Template, lot #105BZ0126071, appeared to be leaking and the integrity of the product was in question. The product was not used on a patient. The complaint was evaluated for MDR reporting on 5/31/l 0 and a MedWatch (MDR 1121308-2010-00016) notification was sent to FDA on 7/28/lO, approximately 58 days after ILS was made aware ofthe complaint.

3) Information pertaining to Complaint PR ID 45844 was provided to an employee (sales representative) ofiLS on 5/24/11 . The complaint states that the inside packaging containing Integra Dermal Regeneration Template, lot #105B00165833, was stained where it should have been sterile. The product was not used on a patient. The complaint was forwarded to the ll.,S Complaint Department and received on 6/2/11 . The complaint was evaluated for MDR reporting on 6/3/ll and according to information provided by the as Complaint Manager it was decided that the event was not reportable. According to the ll.,S Complaint Manager the complaint was re-evaluated on 6/27/1 1 and was determined to be reportable. A MedWatch (MDR I I 21308-20 11-00026) notification was then sent to FDA on 7/5/11 , approximately 42 days after a s was made aware of the complaint.

This is a repeat observation from the previous establishment inspection.

OBSERVATION 8

Procedures for corrective and preventive action have not been adequately established.

A Your fi rm's CAPA procedure is not adequately defined. Specifically -

1) Your firm's CAPA procedure allows corrective and preventive actions to remain uninitiated for prolongf periods of time.

SEE REVERSE OF THIS PAGE

FORM FDA 483 (09/ti8)

EMPLOYEE(S) SIGNATURE

Loretta Nemchi k, I nves t i gato r Meredi th L. Sheridan, Inv e s t i gato r

PREVlOU'S I!OffiON OBsOLETE INSPEcnONAL OBSERVATIONS

DATE ISSl.;ED

08/25/201 1

PAGE 7 OF 9 PAGES

DOSTRICT ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION

DA TE(S) OF INSPECTION

1 0 Waterview Blvd., 3rd Floo r Parsippany, NJ 07054

07/22 / 20 11 - 08/25/2 01 1* FB NUMBER

(973) 33 1-4900 Fax : (973) 331- 4969 1121308 Ind us t ry Info rmat ion: www . f da. gov/oc/indus try NAME AND 1TTlE OF INOIV10UAL TO WHOM REPORT fSS(J'€0

TO: J ohn Ko vacevich, Plant Manager FIRM NAME STREET ADDRESS

Int e g ra Li feS c i e nces Corp 105 Morgan Ln ~~~. S~T~AT~~~ZI~P ~~~C~O~UN~TR~Y~~~~~~----------------~~~~~E~~~~~~~~~~~T~IN~~~Qffi~--------------------·----------

Plai nsboro, NJ 08536-33 39 Med ical Device Manufacturer

a) For example, CAPA 12307 was opened on 10/8/09 as a preventive action to identifY gaps in your firm's previously executed equipment cleaning validations. A Cleaning Validation Gap Analysis status report identifying deficiencies in thesecleaning validations was issued in April 2010 This report recommended that a Master Cleaning Program be written and thatthis program include activities such as establishing dirty equiprne 1 and clean equipment hold times, sampling rationales, acceptable residue limits and conducting recovery tests, activities which were lacking in previously executed cleaning validations. On 2/2J11 , 10 months after the cleaning validation deficiencies were identified, another CAP~ 3 7944, was opened to create a Cleaning Validation Master Plan (CVMP). A risk analysis (5/11) and a cleaning program re-evaluation (4/11) were also conducted as part of CAP A 37944. The CV1v1P which contains requirements for establishment of dirty equipment and clean equipment hold times, worst-case residue assessment and rinse recovery tests was approved in July 2011, more than 15 months after cleaning validation deficiencies were identified.

b) For example, CAPA 7242 was opened on 6/22/09 to investigate potential sources of foreign material (particulates) in final products. The particulates were analyzed and potential sources of the particulates.(materials and equipment) were identified on 3/19/10. A risk analysis identifying the potential effect of the particulates on patients was also performed in March 201 0 under CAPA 7242. On 4/7/10 another CAP A, 21280, was opened to identify potential sources of particulates from equipment used in the manufacturing process and to recommend preventive actions that needed to be taken with the equipment to prevent these particulates from occurring. On 4/ 11/11 another CAP A, 42697, was opened to implement the preventive actions recommended by CAPA 21280. As of the review of CAP A 42697 on or about 7/26/ 11, more than 16 months after equipment was identified as a potential source of the particulates, there was no documentation to indicate that these preventive actions have been implemented.

B. Your firm's CAPA procedure (QA-051) was not adequately implemented.

l) For example, your firm's root cause analysis for CAPA 12498 was not adequate. Specifically, the investigation of CAPA 12498 did not consider the mold discovered in your facility in June 2009 as a possible cause of the viable environmental excursions in the Integra Suite.

2) For example, your procedure requires an interim report for an extension of a CAP A However, the interim report was not done for CAP A 26087 and CAP A 21280 prior to the due date. Specifically, CAP A 26087 was due on 11 /8/10 but the interim report seeking approval to extend the due date was not filed and approved untilll/11 /10. CAPA 21280 was due on 8/16/10 but interim report# 1 seeking approval to extend the due date was not filed and approved until 9/22/1 0 and interim report #2 seeking a-pproval to extend the due date from 3/30/ll was not filed until4/5/ll. Additionally, CAPA 12498 after 3 extensions was due on 4/1 /1 1 but was not closed until mid-April 2011 .

3) For example, your firm's Quality Plans (QP) are not consistently captured in your CAPA system even though your firm's CAP A procedure states that the CAP A procedure applies to preventing and correcting non-conformities ~production processes an~~ystem issues. For example, QP-1 54 issued on 5/5/1 ~theLyophilizer repair. The Lyophilizer is used in the manufacture ofthe Integra Although CAPA 19486 was opened on 3 3/10 to mvestigate and resolv yophilizer issues there is no reference to QP-154 in this CAPA For example, QP- 147 issued on 3/15/11 is the QP for the replacement o gauges in the Integra Suite

(b) (4)

(b) (4) (b) (4)(b) (4)

(b) (4)

SEE REVERSE OF THIS PAGE

FORM FDA 483 (091118)

/"'\

EMPLOVEE{S) SIGNATURE 1-:'. ~~r {tATE iSSUED u \ V

Loretta Nemchik, Investigator ~u l f. ~ Meredith L . Sheridan, Investigator ~di1Jt2Juj~ () /!J 08/25/2011

PREVIDI.JS EDmo~ OBSOLETI: lNSPECfiONAL OBSERVATIONS PAGE80F9PAGES

DISTRICT ADDRESS AND PHONE NU~

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION

DA l'EtS) OF INSPECTION

10 Waterview Blvd., 3rd Floo r Parsippany, NJ 07054

07/22/2011 - 08 / 25/2011* FEl NUMBER

(973) 331-4900 Fax: (973) 331-4969 1121308 Industry Info rmatio n: www.fda.gov/oc/industry NAME AND nTLE OF INDIVIDUAL TO WHOM REPCJRT ISSUED

TO: John Kovacevich, Plant Manager FIRM NAME STREET ADDRESS

Integra LifeSciences Corp 105 Morgan Ln CITY, STATE, ZIP 000E. COUNTRY TYFE ESTABLISHMENT INSPECTED

Plainsboro , NJ 08536-3339 Medical Device Manufacturer

·.

where Integra is manufactured. Although CAP A 37211 was opened on 1/21/11 for the Integra Suite HV AC mechanical, control and room conditioning monitoring mitigation there is no reference to QP-147 in this CAP A.

(b) (4)

DIS"TRICT ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMGER

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FOOD AND DRUG ADM!NISTRA TION

DA TE(S) OF INSPECTION

10 Waterview Blvd., 3rd Floor Parsippany, NJ 07054

07 /22/ 2011 - 08 / 25 / 2 011* FEINUMBER

( 973) 331-4 900 Fax: ( 973) 331-4 969 1121308 Industry Information: ~J.fda.gov/oc/industry N.WE AND TITl-E OF INDIVIDUAL ro WHOM REPORT ISSUED

TO: John Kovacevich, Plant Manager FIRM NAME STREET ADDRESS

Integra LifeSciences Corp CITY, STATE ZIP CODE, COUNTRY

Pl ainsboro, NJ 08536-3339

105 Morgan Ln TVPE ESTABI.JSHMENT INSPEcTED

Medical Devi ce Manufacturer

Observation Annotations

Observation l: Promised to correct. Observation 2: Promised to correct. Observation 3: Promised to correct. Observation 4: Promised to correct. Observation 5: Promised to correct. Observation 6: Promised to correct. Observation 7: Promised to correct. Observation 8: Promised to correct.

"DATES OF INSPECffON: 07/221201l(Fri), 07/25/201l(Mon), 07!26/20 ll(Tue), 07/28/20ll(Thu), 08/0l/20 ll(Mon), 08/02/20ll(Tue), 08/03/20ll(Wed), 08/05/20ll(Fri), 08/08120ll(Mon), 08/09/20 ll(Tue), 08/10120ll(Wed), 08/l6/20ll(Tue), 08/17120 II (Wed), 08/l8/20ll(Tbu), 08/19/20 ll(Fri), 08/24/20ll(Wed), 08/25120 ll(Thu)

Bo!Pt.OYEE(S) SIGNATURE ~ ~ '(_.. DATE ISSUED /

Loretta Nernch ik , Invest igator SEE REVERSE Meredith L. Sheridan, Investigator OF THIS PAGE ~a!Jj~ -ff;;:;/J; 08 / 25/2011

FORM l•'DA 483 (09108) PREVIOUS EDITION OBSOI..ETE JNSPECflONAL OBSERVATIONS PAGE90F9PAGES