inter pipeline asset management & reliability program with
TRANSCRIPT
2015 GOMaximo Annual Conference and Training,
Houston, TX
October 9, 2015
Inter Pipeline
Asset Management &
Reliability Program with
Maximo Oil & Gas
Dan Wood – AMRP Master Data Transitional Lead
Agenda
� Inter Pipeline Ltd. (IPL)
� Maximo
� Asset Management & Reliability Program (AMRP)
– Master Data
– Maintenance Strategies (Work Management)
– Supply Chain Management (SCM, Purchasing and Inventory)
– Reliability Analysis and Life Cycle Cost (RA and LCC)
– Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM)
– Management of Change (MOC)
– Incident Management
� Mobile Maximo
� Organizational Change Management (OCM) and Interim Processes
� Questions
2
2
World Scale Energy Infrastructure Assets
Oil Sands
Transportation
NGL Extraction Conventional
Oil Pipelines
Bulk Liquid
Storage
Over 2.2 million
b/d of contracted
capacity
3,800 km pipeline
network in
western Canada
Process 40% of
natural gas
exported from
Alberta
27 million barrels of storage capacity in
Europe
Inter Pipeline transports, processes and handles 1.9 million barrels of energy
products per day
3
Inter Pipeline Ltd. (IPL)
4
Maximo
� IPL has been a Maximo user for the past decade (early 2000s)
through the use of Work Management, Inventory and Purchasing
throughout the Canadian operations.
� Upgraded to Maximo 7.1 in 2010.
� Upgraded to Maximo 7.5 in 2015.
� IPL has 500+ employees (200+ Field Personal)
� We have 70+ authorized licenses and 200+ limited use licenses.
� Extraction vs Pipeline
5
Asset Management & Reliability Program (AMRP)
6
� 'I tried being reasonable, but I didn't like it.‘
- Clint Eastwood
Asset Management & Reliability Program (AMRP)
� In 2013 IPL began an aggressive initiative, Asset Management and Reliability Program (AMRP),
to take advantage of the available functionality within Maximo 7.5 Oil & Gas, for more robust
business processes.
– Optimize the financial and operational performance of Inter Pipeline’s physical assets
– Improved operational reliability, safety & environmental performance
– Implement standardized scalable practices, processes, and technology for future growth
� AMRP Project Execution Plan
– Design
• Definitions
• Processes
• Process Narratives
• Functional Specifications
• Technical Specifications
• Implementation
– Training, Training, and more Training.
� Best Practices
� ISO 14224 – Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries - collection and exchange of
reliability and maintenance data for equipment.
7
Master Data - Definitions
Inter Pipeline definition of a Location:
� “A static physical place where work is performed and has, had or may have an
asset, or an abstract place that is used to group related places together into a
structure”
Inter Pipeline definition of an Asset:
� “A piece of equipment that requires detailed tracking to support maintenance
activities, supply chain activities, reliability analysis or compliance reporting”
Inter Pipeline definition of the Item (catalog item):
� “A part or supply, with descriptive details, that may be required in operations.
The collection of all items is the Item Master (catalog)”
Inter Pipeline definition of a Structure/Hierarchy:
� “A series of relationships used to organize locations or assets”
8
Spare
Parts
Asset
Structure
Location
Structure
Inter Pipeline Structure
How are these 4 terms are related?:
Parent
Location
Asset
Parent
Location
Operating
Location
Asset
Item
cLocation
Hierarchy
Item
Assembly
Structure
Item
Master Data –Item Master
� Worked with a third party and their standard modifier dictionary(SMD) to optimize
our Item Master, improve the effectiveness and Standardization.
� A standard approach and naming convention was defined for the Item Master,
including required attributes for each Item type.
� Defining Items vs Inventory vs Material
� The current Item Master was reviewed and the new approach and naming convention
was applied to existing items.
� Duplicate items were identified and removed.
� Interim processes and to-be processes were implemented to keep Item Master data
current. Limited people have access to create new items; further limited access
applies to classification and attributes.
� We had roughly 10,000 items in our Item Master that were standardized.
� The third party company enriched 10% of our items.
� We have internally enriched an additional 25% of our items to date.
� The remaining 65% is being enriched on an ongoing bias.
10
Master Data – Assets
� Defined a common definition of “assets” that IPL has adopted by Pipeline Operations,
Extraction Operations and Project Development. This definition includes the list of
asset types to be included in scope. Rotating vs Non-Rotating, we have whole
presentations on this.
� All operating assets are identified, tagged and the required data is collected and
entered into Maximo.
� Interim processes and to-be processes are implemented to keep asset data current.
Interim processes are required prior to the new Maintenance Strategies and Supply
Chain Management processes being implemented.
� A business process is being worked on for Operations to work with Project
Development during the life of a project. The end result of the process will allow for
required information about new assets to be added to Maximo. PD to OPs process.
� All affected staff members are trained on the new processes.
� Challenges involved with the rotating assets and maintaining asset records within
Maximo in a diverse operating network
� One-to-one asset to location relationship.
11
Master Data – Assets
� 71 equipment types as assets, then we defined if they were rotating assets, non-
rotating assets, or tools.
12
Master Data – Locations
� Apply a standard approach and naming convention for defining the Location
Hierarchy, including required attributes for each location type.
� The current Location Hierarchy is reviewed and the new approach and naming
convention is applied to existing locations, as well as new locations being entered as
required.
� Interim processes and to-be processes are implemented to keep location data current.
To-be processes might change with the possible implementation of Linear Asset
functionality.
� A business process is implemented for Operations to work with Project Development
during the life of a project. The new process will allow for required information about
new locations to be added to Maximo.
� All affected staff members are trained on the new processes.
� High Level Hierarchies – System approach
� Low Level Hierarchies – ISO 14224
� Using Visio and Excel.
� Facilities, LACT sites, Valve sites (Mainline and Lateral), and Junctions, etc.
13
Master Data – Naming and Tagging Standard
� The purpose of the Location and Asset Naming and Tagging Standard is to provide a
method for naming and tagging for equipment, instruments, and ancillary devices
located at Inter Pipeline Ltd. (“IPL”)
� This Standard applies to:
– All Canadian assets and locations operated by IPL
– New-build construction, expansion or modifications of assets.
� Existing Equipment that meets Asset Criteria will be tagged according to this standard.
� Cross referencing existing tags with new tags (within Maximo)
� Out of Scope
– Updating Drawings and changing SCADA tags will not be considered In-Scope
work for existing equipment that meets asset criteria for tagging
– Removal of existing equipment/locations tags
14
Master Data – Naming and Tagging Standard
� There are two different types of tagging that apply to equipment and assets:
– Location/Equipment Tags
• These tags will be used for identifying a piece of equipment by location, type
and function. The physical equipment tag will be used on engineered
drawings and site tags.
• The physical equipment tag (on site) will display text containing the
information presented in next slides.
– Asset Tags
• Asset Tags will be assigned and managed within Maximo for history tracking
purposes. They will be physically affixed to assets.
15
Tag String Breakdown
16
The Facility Location
Identifier (AAAA) will be a
distinctive 4 letter
acronym used to identify a
Facility
A unique site identifier xxxx is
sometimes required after the
Facility acronym to further classify
a site. These will be used for
facilities such as Mainline Block
Valve Sites, Lateral Valve Sites and
LACT Sites.
The equipment Designator will be used
to identify Instrument, Electrical and
Mechanical equipment.
The Stream Number will refer
to the specific line number
within the Pipeline System. The
line numbers range from 1-99;
00 indicates it is common to the
facility.
The Unit identifier designates the
equipment unit number which can be
from 1–9. The Unit Identifier is used for
both series and parallel configurations
where multiple units of the same type
may be installed.
Equipment tag numbers are
sequential from 0 – 9. The
general preference is to use
the “Tag Number” to
consecutively number
similar equipment under
the same “Unit Number”.
Indicates
Redundancy
{A, B, C, D,etc.}
Examples of Facility Location Identifiers
HRBF FACILITY Hardisty Booster HRMF FACILITY Hardisty Meter
HTBF FACILITY Hardisty Trim Blend
KSLT LATERAL Kerrobert South Lateral
LBLT LATERAL Little Bow Lateral
LHLT LATERAL Lathom Lateral
GSLT0415 LACT SITE Gooseberry LACT 04-15
GSLT0511 LACT SITE Gooseberry LACT 05-11
GSLT0730 LACT SITE Gooseberry LACT 07-30
17
Master Data – Naming and Tagging Standard
� CAPL System Hierarchy
18
Master Data – Naming and Tagging Standard
� CAPL Gathering Hierarchy
19
Master Data – Naming and Tagging Standard
� Marked up existing drawings, P&ID, PFDs, Plot Plans, etc.
20
Master Data – Hierarchy in Maximo
21
Data Collection and Tagging
� The logistics involved is a massive field data collection initiative including:
– Pre-collection hierarchy and template development
– High level hierarchies built in Visio, low level (detailed) built in Excel
– Data collection sheets
– Physical collection of asset information through a diverse operations area
– Data validation and mass loads into Maximo
� Interim processes necessary to maintain asset quality
� Tags – Durablack (black anodized aluminum) and tesa Tape (indoors), Barcode 2D
Matrix,
� SS ball chain and 3M adhesive.
� Epilog Laser Printer
� Pilot Tagging and Data Collection (3 days – collected and tagged 330
locations/assets 650 pictures)
� Winter tagging (team of 3) ~100 assets per day, Summer tagging (team of 3) ~200
assets per day.
22
Lessons Learned
23
� Recognize mistakes / problems
� Observe what works / opportunities
� Document them
� Share them
� What went well
� What did not go well
� Remove for Improvement
� After action review / next steps
Tagging and Data Collection
24
Current and Estimated Asset Count
System Current
Locations
Future
Locations
Current
Assets
Future
Assets
Actual
Locations
Actual
Assets
BRPL 633 13,500 155 13,500 3,948 (x3) 2,547 (x3)
CAPL 183 5,500 60 5,500 2,724 1,347
CEP 7,712 15,000 9,033 15,000 TBD TBD
CLPL 200 6,500 10 6,500 TBD TBD
CRPL 183 4,500 0 4,500 TBD TBD
MSPL 110 2,500 49 2,500 TBD TBD
PSPL 61 2,500 0 2,500 TBD TBD
Totals 9,082 50,000 9,307 50,000 TBD TBD
25
• Estimated Future Locations and Assets are based on our Asset List and current Locations in Maximo. Class 5 Estimate +/-
50%, 2014.
• Current equipment lists and assets are track via spreadsheets.
• Actual Assets ~ 10% Rotating Assets
Maintenance Strategies (Work Management)
26
� “Another flaw in the human character is that
everybody wants to build and nobody wants
to do maintenance.”
- Kurt Vonnegut, Hocus Pocus
Maintenance Strategies (Work Management)
� IPL has used the Work Management module within Maximo for the past decade but until
this point there has not been a workflow developed to assist in the planning, scheduling
and execution of maintenance activities.
� There are several challenges encountered when developing a workflow process, which
could be successful in a company which has not used one until this point. It can be quite
easy to build a workflow process which is very robust, but not practical for the maturity of
the organization.
� Developing a workflow process which is suitable for the maturity of your organization is
vital to the implementation of the program.
� Configuration of the ‘out of the box’ screens to simplify the user experience .
� IPL intends to utilize the Job Plan module and some of the limitations to expect based on
interfaces with inventory control and procurement processes.
� Preventative Maintenance philosophy for asset and location relationships and when it is
appropriate to use the Routes module based on your location hierarchy
� Plan on utilizing Maximo Scheduler.
� We have 14 current WO statuses. End state will have 19 WO statuses. The minimum
amount of statuses a WO needs to go through will be similar to current state. The
additional statuses can be used by new teams (Planners / Schedulers to organize their
work).
27
Work Orders and the Process it Drives
Asset Management & Reliability Program (AMRP)
� Organization Change Management (OCM) and Interim Processes
– Training requirements to ensure that users are brought along with the changes being
made to the way we do business and the challenges involved. There are two main
categories of training within IPL’s AMRP initiative:
• Interim processes, which are necessary to maintain the integrity of the asset
information which has been collected in the field.
• End state processes, which are extensive but necessary to bring the above initiatives
together.
� Mobile Maximo
– IPL has chosen a mobile vendor which meets the needs of the end state processes,
requiring little to no customization and only simple configuration. This year IPL will have
Maximo users on mobile devices throughout several operating districts. IPL will discuss:
• Rollout of a proof of concept for the mobility initiative
• User experiences with mobility
• Working in remote locations with the mobility product
• Plans for full implementation
29
Asset Management & Reliability Program (AMRP)
� Supply Chain Management (SCM, Purchasing and Inventory)
� Reliability Analysis and Life Cycle Cost (RA and LCC)
� Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM)
� Management of Change (MOC)
� Incident Management
30
Conclusion
31
� “I just hope that one day - preferably when
we’re both blind drunk - we can talk about it.”
- J.D. Salinger
Program Highlights
� Attendee Survey
– Your feedback on this event is very important
to the GOMaximo Board.
• Access gomaximo.org/training to provide feedback
on specific training sessions
• Go to gomaximo.org/conference to let us know
your thoughts on the overall conference.
– Everyone who completes a survey will be
entered into a drawing for cash prizes.
32
Questions
33
Contact Information:
Dan Wood, P.Eng., PMP
AMRP Master Data Transitional Lead
403.218.9560