interaction between deformation sources and seismicity in
TRANSCRIPT
SIF 2010, 20-24 September 2010 1
Interaction between deformation sources and seismicity in a volcanic region: the case of the 1982-1984 bradyseism at the Campi Flegrei caldera (Italy).
M. E. Belardinelli (1), A. Bizzarri (2), G. Berrino (3) and G. P. Ricciardi (3),
(1) Università di Bologna(2) INGV, Bologna (3) INGV-OV, Napoli
SIF 2010, 20-24 September 2010 2
Mainshocks affect subsequent seismicity (e.g. mainshock-aftershock sequences).
The Omori law is an empirical law to express the aftershock rate (AR) as a function from time since the mainshock.
Dieterich (1994) proposed a physical model for the Omori law.
He assumed a rate- and state- (R&S) dependent friction on aftershock faults.
Background
t ( )
SIF 2010, 20-24 September 2010 3
R&S friction:Dieterich – Ruina law
( )
parameters lrheologica L, , , variablestate
velocitysliding v *stressnormaleffective
tdd
L v1
tdd
L
vln
vvln v,
αΨ
σ
σσΨαΨΨ
σΨ
μσΨμτ
ba
b
b a
eff
effeff
eff*
**efff
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−−=
⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛+
⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜
⎝
⎛+==
resistancefrictionalon theeffect direct effaA σ=
variablestateaandvelocityslidingtheondependsresistancefrictional fτ
* (normal stress decreased by pore pressure)
SIF 2010, 20-24 September 2010 4
Let us consider a population of faults subjected to τ (t) as a shear stress and σeff (t) as an effective normal stress(Dieterich ’94) seismicity rate R(t)
where
If a localized source of deformation/stress is present:
shearinrateloadingregional rate, background , rr
rrR ττγ
&&
=
Background
)()(
)(1)(
1⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−+−= ttt
ta effeffeff
σασ
τγτγσ
γ &&&),(tγγ =
the seismicity depends on the related perturbation of stress on neighboring faults.
E.g.: 1976-1983 intrusion of magma into the rift zones of Kilauea.
SIF 2010, 20-24 September 2010 5
In seismic areas, the seismicity rate (SR) depends on the stress change due to the mainshocks (coseismic stress-changes). E.g. Catalli et al., 2008:
1997, Umbria-Marche, Central Italy, seismic sequence
In volcanic areas, SR is shown to be also affected by moderate* stressing rates.
The latter can be provided by deformation sources typical of volcanic areas (e.g. evolving dykes, sills or reservoirs of magma).
Following Dieterich ’94
*compared to coseismic ones.
Toda et al. (2003): seismicity associated to the 2000, Izu Islands dike intrusion,
the aftershock decaydepends on the distance from the dyke
data model
SIF 2010, 20-24 September 2010 6
The Campi Flegrei case
A correlation between seismicity rate and rate of ground uplift can be noted at Campi Flegrei (CF) caldera (e.g. Berrino and Gasperini, 1995).
Berrino and Gasperini, 1995
/ month
SIF 2010, 20-24 September 2010 7
The 1982-1984 unrest
During the 1982-1984 unrest episode seismicity interested a restricted area in the Campi Flegrei (CF) caldera. Most of earthquakes have normal or normal-strike-slip mechanisms (e.g. Orsi et al. 1999).
modified from R. Scandone et al., 2009 (personal communication) Miseno Nisida
Solfatara
Miseno Nisida
SIF 2010, 20-24 September 2010 8
Summary1. Static stress changes caused by the inflating source at CF on OOPS
(optimally oriented planes for shear failure).
2. Modeling of stress dependence on time from uplift history recorded by a tide gauge at Pozzuoli.
3. Estimate of SR as a function of time from a R&S model proposed by Dieterich (1994).
SIF 2010, 20-24 September 2010 9
σ T chosen in order to have a bounded area with
Static stress changes
In each location, OOPS have the same total stress of CoulombRegional stress: vertical compressive axis, N36°E trending tensional axis,
fliteff
effTOTc
pp −+=
−+−=00
00
σσσΔμτΔμστσ
Source: vertical, penny-shaped spheroid (Amoruso et al., 2006) in a layered half space at 5.2 km depth.Computation depth: 3 km
) chydrostati ( MPa 20 fT p=σ
Region of interest: 80% of 1982-84 seismic events
0>TOTcσ
03
Tσσ −=
SIF 2010, 20-24 September 2010 10
One plane in the couple of OOPS
Static stress changes: OOPS
The conjugate plane in the couple of OOPS
Normal faults with oblique components near the source
σΔμτΔσΔ ×−=C
Δσ=0 :
mean value between the two OOPS in the same location;
for each OOP, average value within the region of interest.
SIF 2010, 20-24 September 2010 11
In the region of interest there are two main, almost equivalent, configurations with different sign in normal stress : PP and PN.In order to keep changes in normal stress, we keep separate the two configurations in averaging stress changes and prestress within the region of interest.
Time dependence of stress
max0
max0
/)()(
shearin rate loading /)()(
utut
ututt
effeff
r
r
ΔσΔσσ
τΔτΔτττ
+=
++=&
&
16.521.3(MPa)
3.848.28(MPa)
1.70-2.68(MPa)
10.76.76(MPa)
PPPNParameter
τΔσΔ0τ0effσ
We consider a piecewise linear approximation, u(t), of the uplift history recorded by a tide gage at Pozzuoli.We express time-dependent components of stress
as
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Sep-80 Jun-83 Mar-86 Dec-88
time
uplif
t (m
)
1.6 m Δumax
stresschanges
pre-stress
Averages in the region of interest
SIF 2010, 20-24 September 2010 12
(Dieterich ’94)
We analytically integrate an approximation of the differential equation for γ (t) in month interval of constant
We consider different values of both:
We choose the values that best reproduce the initial stage of seismicity at CF, which is delayed of some months with respect to ground uplift.
SR estimatesmonths 4each event seismic 1rate backgroud , ≈= r
rR
rτγ &
effστ && and
.shearinrateloadingregional ,
and
resistance frictionalon effect direct the of value initial ,0
0
r
effaA
τ
σ
&
=
SIF 2010, 20-24 September 2010 13
SR estimates: role of free parametersPN config.
Time scale Amplitude
Effect of A0
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
0 500 1000 1500days since 1 Jan 1982
SR (e
arth
quak
es/m
onth
)
data
0.01 MPa case 1(Toda et al., 2002)
0.04 MPa (Catalliet al.)
0.27 MPa
0.45 MPa(Dieterich et al.,2000 )
, 2008)
Effect of dΤr/dt
0.01
1
100
10000
0 500 1000 1500days since 1 Jan 1982
SR (e
arth
quak
es/m
onth
)
data
1.e-3 MPa/yr,Catalli et al., 2008
1.e-2 MPa/yr(Toda et al.,2002)
0.3 MPa/yr case 1(Dieterich et al.,2000 )
Dieterich et al. (2000): seismicity in a volcanic province, 7 km depth (1976-1990, south flank of Kilauea, dyke intrusions and mainshocks)Toda et al. (2003) seismicity in a volcanic province (2000, Izu Islands dike intrusion and mainshocks) Catalli et al. (2008) seismic sequence (1997, Umbria-Marche, Central Italy)
SIF 2010, 20-24 September 2010 14
Results
-200
300
800
1300
Apr-82 Oct-82 Apr-83 Oct-83 Apr-84 Oct-84 Mar-85 Sep-85
time
SR (n
. eqs
/mon
th)
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
uplif
t rat
e (m
m/d
ay)
observedmodel PPmodel PNuplift rate
General agreement concerning the duration and maximum values of SR data at CF.
SR are damped bynegative stressing rates (subsidence)
End of uplift
Subsidence
SIF 2010, 20-24 September 2010 15
conditions alhydrotherm (PP) 0.023 sexperimentfriction in standard (PN) 0.013
→==
aa
2008) al.,et (CatalliItaly Centralin seismicityMPa/yr 10 -3 ←≈rτ&
00 /σAa =Estimate of
Estimate of
1.0 ×10-30.27PN
1.3 ×10-30.38PP
Config. (MPa/yr)rτ&(MPa) 0A
Parameter estimates
SIF 2010, 20-24 September 2010 16
Conclusive remarks
In order to simulate a region of potential failure resembling that one affected by most of seismic events, a suitable magnitude of a regional extensional stress can be chosen.
Such a regional stress can explain normal/oblique faulting above the inflating source, as observed.
According to our model, near the end of the uplift, stressing rates useful for Coulomb failure are slowly* decreasing, while they are negative during subsequent subsidence.
In comparison with SR data as a function of time, suitable values of parameters of a R&S model are either consistent with values observed in laboratory (a) or previously proposed for Italy (dτr /dt).
To conclude, seismicity rates can be affected by either slowly* increasing or decreasing the Coulomb stressing rate on potential faults. The last effect is remarkable in the case of CF unrest.
*compared to coseismic stressing rates
We focus on the temporal distribution of seismicity during the 1982-1984 unrest at Campi Flegrei caldera.
SIF 2010, 20-24 September 2010 17
Thank you for your attention References:
Amoruso, A., L. Crescentini and G. Berrino (2008), Simultaneous inversion of deformation and gravity changes in a horizontally layered half-space: evidence for magma intrusion during the 1982-1984 unrest at Campi Flegrei caldera (Italy), Earth. Planet. Sci. Lett., 272, 181-188.
Berrino G., and P. Gasparini (1995), Ground deformation and caldera unrest, Cahiers du Centre Européen de Geodynamique et de Séismologie, 8, 41-55.
Catalli, F., M. Cocco, R. Console, and L. Chiaraluce (2008), Modeling seismicity rate changes during the 1997 Umbria-Marche sequence (central Italy) through a rate- and state-dependent model, J. Geophys. Res., 113, B11301, doi:10.1029/2007JB005356.
Dieterich, J., Cayol, V., and P. Okubo (2000), The use of earthquake rate changes as a stress meter at Kilauea volcano, Nature, 408, 457-460.
Orsi, G., L. Civetta, C. Del Gaudio, S. De Vita, M. A. Di Vito, R. Isaia, S. M. Petrazzuoli, G. P. Ricciardi, and C. Ricco (1999), Short-term ground deformations and seismicity in the resurgent Campi Flegrei caldera (Italy): An example of active block-resurgence in a densely populated area, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 91, 415–451.
Toda, S., R. S. Stein, and T. Sagiya (2002), Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands earthquake swarm that stressing rate governs seismicity, Nature, 419, 58– 61.