km deep enhanced geothermal system in finland solicited: andrew barbour (united states geological...

32
www.seismo.ethz.ch/schatzalp

Upload: others

Post on 24-Sep-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 2: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal
Page 3: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

Contents

„The Magic Mountain“ by Thomas Mann 2Welcome to the 3rd Schatzalp Workshop 4Tuesday‘s Programme, 5 March 2019 5Wednesday‘s Programme, 6 March 2019 5Thursday‘s Programme, 7 March 2019 8Friday‘s Programme, 8 March 2019 11List of Posters 13Maps of Poster and Lecture Halls 21List of Participants 23Organizing Committee 27Sponsors 27

Page 4: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

1

ww

w.s

wis

sinf

o.ch

/ger

/win

ter-

post

kart

en-i

n-ph

otoc

hrom

_die

-bun

te-w

elt-

der-

belle

-epo

que/

4194

2788

Page 5: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

2

„The Magic Mountain“ by Thomas Mann

„And so what had to happen happened, and Hans Castorp expe-rienced what he would never have dreamed possible only a short while before. Winter was upon them, the local winter, with which Joachim was already familiar, because it had been raging at full force when he had arrived the previous year. Hans Castorp, how-ever, had been somewhat afraid of its onslaught, although he knew he was definitely well equipped for it.

His cousin tried to calm him. [...]

Snow began to accumulate in earnest and present difficulties. Both the path to the bench beside the water trough and the dri-veway to the valley were kept shoveled clear, but were so narrow that there was no room for someone to move aside. When peo-ple met, one party had to step into the snowbank, sinking in up to the knee. All day a horse led by a man at its halter pulled a heavy stone snow-roller through the streets of the resort below; and what looked like an old-fashioned postal carriage on runners, with a plow mounted up front to push great masses of white to each side, commuted between the resort and Davos-Dorf, as the settlement to the north was known. [...]

At all seven tables in the dining hall, the onset of winter, the “season” in these regions, was the major topic of conversation. A great many tourists and athletes, it was said, had already arri-ved, filling the hotels in Dorf and Platz. The snow accumulation was estimated at two feet, its consistency perfect for skiing. Ac-ross the way people were hard at work on the bobsled run — from the top of the northwest slope of Schatzalp to the valley below — and it was expected to be open within a few days; that was, if a warm foehn wind did not spoil everything. People were looking forward to the activities that healthy guests would soon be pursuing again in the valley below — organized races and contests, which they all planned to attend, even if it meant breaking the rules and playing hooky from rest cure. The-re was a new sport, Hans Castorp learned, an invention from the north called skijoring, a race in which contestants on skis were pulled by horses. [...]“

Excerpt from „The magic mountain“ by Thomas Mann; published by Alfred A. Knopf; translated by John E. Woods. New York, London, Toronto: Everyman‘s Library, 1995.

Page 6: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

3

Page 7: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

4

We are delighted that again so many of you decided to come all the way to Davos for 2 ½ days of posters, presentations, discus-sions and networking. The program is packed with exciting science covering the numerous facets of induced seismicity. We scheduled enough time to view the poster and of course, we count on the enchantment of this ‘magic mountain’ to create a memorable workshop for all of us.

This is our third workshop here in Davos and despite much progress, induced seismicity remains a major challenge for science, industry, regulators and societies. Recent events, such as the 2017 Pohang earthquake, sometimes make us wonder if we are today any closer to understanding, let alone controlling, anthropogenic earthquakes than we were during the first work-shop in 2015.

To us organizers, the workshops have always been deeply rewar-ding and inspiring, and we like to thank all of you for your contri-butions that are the essence of the meeting. Welcome again, enjoy the Schatzalp, and let us know your feedback on the work-shop!

With best wishes,

Stefan Wiemer, Toni Kraft, and Barbara Naegeli

Welcome to the 3rd Schatzalp Workshop on Induced Seismicity!

Page 8: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

5

Wednesday‘s Programme, 6 March 2019

Registration and Installation of Posters Part A

Toni Kraft (Swiss Seismological Service) and Gunter Siddiqi (Swiss Federal Office of Energy)Welcome address

Case Studies I: World Tour

Keynote: William L. Ellsworth (Stanford University)Induced Seismicity in the Permian Basin, USA

Solicited: Brian Baptie (British Geological Survey)Seismicity Induced by Hydraulic Fracturing operations at Preston New Road, Lancashire, 2018

Solicited: Vala Hjorleifsdottir (Reykjavik Energy)Induced earthquakes in the Hellisheiði geothermal field, Iceland

Solicited: Antony Butcher (University of Bristol)Induced Seismicity at Thoresby Colliery, UK

Solicited: Kwang-Hee Kim (Pusan National University)The 15 November 2017 Pohang Earthquake

Discussion

Coffee Break

from 16:00

from 18:00

from 20:00

Tuesday‘s Programme, 5 March 2019

Registration at Schatzalp Lobby

Ice-breaker (aperitif and Swiss music)

Self-paid Dinner at Panorama Restaurant(menu for CHF 27.50)

from 07:30

08:00

Session 1

08:10

08:30

08:45

09:00

09:15

09:30

09:50–10:20

Page 9: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

6

Social Aspects of Induced Seismicity

Keynote: Manuel Sintubin (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)The Societal Role of Scientists in Induced Seismicity – Lessons Learned from Groningen (The Netherlands)

Keynote: Caspar Hirschi (University of St. Gallen)The Limits of Expert Knowledge as a Political Problem

Keynote: Jen Schneider (Boise State University)All Shook Up: Rethorics of Induced Seismicity

Keynote: Evelina Trutnevyte (University of Geneva)Where do energy and environmental benefits from EGS outweigh induced seismicity risk?

Discussion

Lunch Break

Natural or Induced, and Beyond

Solicited: Peter Meier (Geo-Energie Suisse AG)Understanding the Pohang EGS reservoir and the need for advanced traffic light systems

Keynote: Gunter Siddiqi (Swiss Federal Office of Energy)Non-seismic Reverberations of the M5.4 Pohang Earthquake in Switzerland

Keynote: Torsten Dahm (German Research Centre For Geosciences)Earthquakes close to anthropogenic activities – statistical discrimination without statistics?

Solicited: Julian Bommer (Imperial College London)Towards a More Robust and Transparent Simplified Scheme for the Discrimination of Induced from Natural Seismicity

Keynote: Norman Sieroka (ETH Zurich)Human-induced or Natural? – Some Philosophical Considerations and Concepts

Discussion

Coffee Break

10:40

11:00

11:20

11:40

12:00–13:30

Session 3

13:30

13:45

14:05

14:25

14:40

15:00

15:20–15:50

Session 2

10:20

Page 10: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

7

Induced Seismicity in the Dutch Gas Fields

Solicited: Bernard Dost (Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute)New developments in monitoring seismicity in the Groningen gas field

Keynote: Stephen Bourne (Shell Global Solutions International B.V.)Physics-based, operational forecasting of productioninduced seismicity within the Groningen gas field

Keynote: Jan-Dirk Jansen (Delft University of Technology)Insights from a closed-form solution for injection- and production-induced stresses in vertical displaced faults

Solicited: Sander Osinga (TNO)A Framework for Training and Testing Induced Seismicity Forecasting Models: the Groningen Case Study

Discussion

Wine and Cheese, Posters Part A

Break

Snow Hike with Torches

Outdoor Dinner (Fondue) at Schatzalp Snow Beach

16:05

16:25

16:45

17:00

17:20–19:00

19:30–20:30

20:30–22:30

19:00

Session 4

15:50

Page 11: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

8

Thursday‘s Programme, 7 March 2019

Installation of Posters Part B

Physics of Induced Earthquakes I

Keynote: Chris Marone (Pennsylvania State University)Laboratory Earthquakes Precursors and Prediction

Solicited: Marco Scuderi (Sapienza University of Rome)Fluid-injection and the mechanics of frictional stability of shale-bearing faults

Keynote: Art Mc Garr (United States Geological Survey)Seismic and Aseismic Response to Fluid Injection

Keynote: Jean Schmittbuhl (Strasbourg University/CNRS)Induced seismic and aseismic slip in EGS reservoir: Case studies from Alsace, France

Keynote: Alexandre Schubnel (Ecole Normale Supérieure de Paris)Energy budget during laboratory earthquakes

Discussion

Coffee Break

Physics of Induced Earthquakes II

Solicited: Lisa Johann (Freie Universität Berlin)Seismicity in Central Oklahoma shows features of reservoir-induced seismicity

Keynote: Thomas Goebel (University of California at Santa Cruz)Examining the distance decay and effects of active mitigation on injection induced seismicity

Keynote: Jean-Paul Ampuero (Université Côte d’Azur)Connecting physics-based models of natural and induced seismicity

Solicited: François Passelegue (EPFL Lausanne)On the nature of induced seismicity: Control from pore pressure distribution

from 07:30

08:00

Session 5

08:20

08:35

08:55

09:15

09:35

09:55–10:25

Session 6

10:25

10:40

11:00

11:20

Page 12: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

9

Solicited: Peter van den Bogert (Shell)An analytical approach to fault rupturing in depleting gas reservoirs

Discussion

Lunch Break

Modelling Induced Seismicity

Solicited: Antonio Pio Rinaldi (Swiss Seismological Service)Hydroshearing and permeability enhancement: Revisiting a fracture zone stimulation at Fenton Hill

Solicited: Alice-Agnes Gabriel (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität)Multi-physics earthquake simulations on complex fault networks across scales

Solicited: Dominik Zbinden (Swiss Seismological Service)Induced seismicity during the St. Gallen deep geothermal project, Switzerland: insights from numerical modeling

Solicited: Robert Vörös (Q-con GmbH)Inferring in situ Reservoir Pressure From Induced Earthquakes

Discussion

Coffee Break

14:25

14:40

15:00–15:30

11:35

11:50

12:10–13:40

Session 7

13:40

13:55

14:10

Page 13: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

10

15:50

16:05

16:20

16:40

17:00

17:20–19:20

19:20

20:00–22:30

Deep Underground Laboratories

Keynote: Jens Birkholzer (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)Induced Seismicity and CCS at Scale: Understanding Caprock Integrity Impacts Based on Mesoscale Experiments

Solicited: Kristine Pankow (University of Utah)Seismic Monitoring at the Utah Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy

Solicited: Georg Dresen (German Research Centre For Geosciences)STIMTEC – a mine-back experiment in the Reiche Zeche underground laboratory

Keynote: Frédéric Cappa (Université Côte d’Azur)Injection-Induced Seismicity and Aseismic Fault Slip in Laborato-ry and In-Situ Experiments and Hydromechanical Models

Keynote: Domenico Giardini (ETH Zurich)From rock-deformation laboratory to the deep underground laboratory of Bedretto: covering geothermal applications and earthquake physics at multiple scales

Discussion

Wine and Cheese, Posters Part B

Break

Conference Dinner

Session 8

15:30

Page 14: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

11

Friday‘s Programme, 8 March 2019

Hotel Check-out

Advances in Monitoring Induced Seismicity

Solicited: Joseph Doetsch (Swiss Seismological Service)The Grimsel in-situ stimulation project – on the seismo-hydro-mechanical response during hydraulic stimulation tests

Solicited: Bettina Goertz-Allmann (NORSAR)Understanding reservoir processes in injection operations from advanced microseismic analysis

Solicited: Marcus Herrmann (Swiss Seismological Service)Statistical and Phenomenological Analysis of a High-resolution Catalog of Induced Seismicity in Basel

Solicited: Francesco Grigoli (Swiss Seismological Service)Monitoring induced seismicity with a single seismic station by combining coda wave interferometry with distance geometry solvers

Solicited: Corinna Roy (University of Leeds)Quantification of location errors for mining induced seismicity in New Ollerton, UK, using 3D Monte Carlo body wave tomography

Discussion

Coffee Break

Case studies II: panta rhei

Solicited: Sigurjon Jonsson (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology)What Triggers Seasonal Earthquakes in South Iceland?

Solicited: Grzegorz Kwiatek (German Research Centre for Geosciences)Controlling induced seismicity during hydraulic stimulation of a 6 km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland

Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey)Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal Fluid Redistribution

from 07:30

08:30

Session 9

08:45

09:00

09:15

09:30

09:45

10:05–10:35

Session 10

10:35

10:50

11:05

Page 15: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

12

Solicited: Enrique Chon (University of Colorado)Repeating Earthquakes and Shear Wave Anisotropy Measure-ments from an Induced Seismicity Case Study, Wattenberg Disposal Zone

Solicited: Zhuo Yang (Harvard University)Fault reactivation by fluid injection considering permeability evolution in damage zones: a case study of Guy-Greenbrier sequence

Keynote: Stefan Wiemer (Swiss Seismological Service)Testing advanced traffic light systems for the management of induced seismicity

Discussion

Stefan Wiemer (Swiss Seismological Service)Farewell address

Lunch Break and End of Workshop

11:20

11:35

11:50

12:10

12:40–14:00

12:30

Page 16: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

13

List of Posters

Wednesday, 17:20–19:00 (Wine and cheese)

Thursday, 17:20–19:20 (Wine and cheese)

Posters Part A

Case Studies I: World Tour

Thorbjörg Ágústsdóttir (Iceland GeoSurvey)Seismicity rate and earthquake source mechanisms in the Hengill and Hverahlíð geothermal fields, SW-Iceland, October 2016-2018

Chris Bromley (GNS Science)Benefits of Non-Damaging, Publicly-Acceptable, Geothermal Induced Micro-Seismicity in New Zealand

Paul Friberg (Instrumental Software Technologies)Seismicity Induced by Hydraulic Fracturing in Ohio in 2016: Case study of the Conotton sequence in Harrison County

Laura Gulia (Swiss Seismological Service)Reinvestigating the earthquake size distribution of induced seismicity at the Groningen gas field

Stephen Hicks (Imperial College London)The 2018 Newdigate, Surrey, UK earthquake sequence: induced by nearby oilfield activities, or not?

Gregor Hillers (University of Helsinki)Data features from a network around the 2018 EGS stimulation in Espoo/Helsinki, Finland

Guoyan Jiang (The Chinese University of Hong Kong)Ground Expansion and Seismic Hazard Induced by the Hutubi Natural Gas Repository, Xinjiang, China

Andrew Jupe (altcom Limited)Seismic monitoring at the United Downs Deep Geothermal Project (UDDGP), Cornwall, United Kingdom

Anne Obermann (Swiss Seismological Service)COSEISMIQ Project: Control Seismicity and Mange Induced Earthquakes

Posters Part A

Session 1

Posters Part B

ID: 2914Board: P1-01

ID: 3046Board: P1-02

ID: 3319Board: P1-03

ID: 3045Board: P1-04

ID: 2890Board: P1-05

ID: 2905Board: P1-06

ID: 3440Board: P1-07

ID: 3441Board: P1-17

ID: 3442Board: P1-16

Page 17: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

14

ID: 3068Board: P1-08

Natural or Induced, and Beyond

Andrés Alcolea (Geo-Energie Suisse AG)Hydromechanical modelling of the hydraulic stimulation PX2-1 in Pohang (South Korea)

Celso Alvizuri (University of Lausanne)Seismic moment tensor analysis for the 2016 Gyeongju and 2017 Pohang earthquakes

Falko Bethmann (Geo-Energie Suisse AG)Seismicity analysis with spatial or temporal relation to the deep geothermal project in Pohang

Simone Cesca (German Research Centre for Geosciences)The November 15, 2017, Pohang earthquake: A potential anthropogenic event of Mw 5.5 in South Korea

Jin-Han Ree (Korea University)Reactivation of Unfavorably-oriented Faults for the 2017 Pohang Earthquake Sequence: Driven by Fluid Overpressure?

Social Aspects of Induced Seismicity

Evelina Trutnevyte (University of Geneva)Views of the informed citizen panel to EGS and other electricity generation alternatives in Switzerland

Session 2

Session 3

ID: 3269Board: P1-15

ID: 3394Board: P1-12

ID: 3069Board: P1-13

ID: 3287Board: P1-14

ID: 3050Board: P1-11

ID: 3017Board: P1-09

ID: 2953Board: P1-10

Marc Schaming (Strasbourg University/CNRS)Studying induced seismicity within the EPOS Thematic Core Service on Anthropogenic Hazards (TCS-AH)

Rob Skoumal (United States Geological Survey)Characterizing seismogenic faults and discerning hydraulic fracturing induced earthquakes in Oklahoma

Page 18: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

15

ID: 3100Board: P2-02

ID: 3115Board: P2-05

ID: 3305Board: P2-06

ID: 3066Board: P2-04

Deep Underground Laboratories

Marian Hertrich (SCCER-SoE)Design of the seismic monitoring network for the stimulation experiments in the Bedretto Deep Underground Rock Laboratory

Xiaodong Ma (Swiss Seismological Service)In situ stress characterization in the Bedretto Underground Labo-ratory: implications for induced slip of existing fractures

Anne Obermann (Swiss Seismological Service)CS-D experiment: CO2 injection and mobility within a fault zone in tight caprock at Mont Terri

Katrin Plenkers (Gesellschaft für Material prüfung und Geophysik)Seismic Response to Hydraulic Fracturing in Anisotropic Rock

Linus Villiger (Swiss Seismological Service)On the variability of seismic response during multiple decameter-scale hydraulic stimulations in crystalline rock

Session 8

ID: 2984Board: P2-01

ID: 3074Board: P2-13

ID: 3054Board: P2-15

ID: 2995Board: P2-14

Session 9

ID: 3276Board: P2-16

Advances in Monitoring Induced Seismicity

Amandine Amemoutou (German Research Centre for Geosciences)Moment tensors of waste-water disposal induced seismicity in southern Kansas

Nepomuk Boitz (Free University Berlin)The influence of seismic anisotropy on microseismic moment tensors and their radiation patterns

Felix Borleanu (National Institute for Earth Physics, Romania)Microseismic monitoring and source discrimination at Izvorul Muntelui dam, northeast Romania

Tobias Diehl (Swiss Seismological Service)Towards Real-Time Double-Difference Hypocenter Relocation as Component for Advanced Traffic Light Systems

Page 19: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

16

ID: 2931Board: P2-12

ID: 3063Board: P2-09

ID: 2987Board: P2-07

ID: 3155Board: P2-10

ID: 2973Board: P2-08

ID: 3073Board: P2-11

Laure Duboeuf (NORSAR)Automatic picking for induced seismicity in Iceland using an EAT (Empirically Aggregated Template) methodology

Sepideh Karimi (nanometrics inc)Practical Implementation and Evaluation of a Real-time Forecas-ting-based Induced Seismicity Management System

Jannes Kinscher (INERIS)Automatic full wave-form based monitoring at the deep Garpen-berg metal mine

Andy Nowacki (University of Leeds)Automatic detection and location of induced and natural earth-quakes using Multichannel Coherency Migration

Hanneke Paulssen (Utrecht University)P wave travel time changes in the Groningen reservoir

Natascha Vollmer (K-UTEC AG Salt Technologies)The seismic monitoring system in the Velenje mine, Slovenia

Page 20: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

17

Physics of Induced Earthquakes I

Michelle Almakari (Mines ParisTech)Shear induced fluid flow and permeability enhancement during fluid injection lab experiment

Stephan Bentz (German Research Centre for Geosciences)Analysis of microseismicity framing Mw > 2.5 earthquakes at The Geysers geothermal field, California

Nathalie Casas (Institut national des sciences appliquées de Lyon)Slip in granular fault gouges: factors influencing the slip regime.

Adam Klinger (University of Bristol)Stress drop parameters of fracking-induced microseismicity.

Brice Tanguy Alphonse Lecampion (EPFL Lausanne)A-seismic fracture growth driven by fluid injection and remote nucleation of dynamic rupture in a weaker part of the fault

Jose Angel Lopez-Comino (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology)Rupture complexity of an injection induced event: the 2016 Mw 5.1 Fairview, Oklahoma earthquake

Yusuke Mukuhira (Tohoku University)Dependency of the induced seismicity b-value on the stress state of existing fractures

Verena Simon (Swiss Seismological Service)High-resolution analysis of seismicity patterns in microearthqua-ke sequences using waveform similarity methods

Session 5

ID: 2997Board: P1-01

ID: 2980Board: P1-04

ID: 3022 Board: P1-07

ID: 2991Board: P1-06

ID: 3391Board: P1-09

ID: 3164Board: P1-08

ID: 3020Board: P1-03

ID: 3393Board: P1-10

ID: 3037Board: P2-14

Induced Seismicity in the Dutch Gas Fields

Loes Buijze (TNO)Elastic vs inelastic reservoir compaction: Effect on the stress path, fault reactivation, and induced seismic rupture

Annemarie Muntendam-Bos (SodM/Delft University of Technology)Clustering Characteristics of Gas-Extraction Induced Seismicity

Session 4

ID: 3061Board: P2-15

Posters Part B

Page 21: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

18

ID: 3029Board: P1-02

ID: 3251Board: P1-05

Sergey Turuntaev (Institute of Geosphere Dynamics of Russian Academy of Sciences)Laboratory study of hydrofracturing and related seismicity

Clay Wood (Pennsylvania State University)The Effect of Roughness on the Elasticity and Permeability of Fractured Media

ID: 3052Board: P1-12

ID: 3044Board: P1-15

ID: 3354Board: P1-16

ID: 3055Board: P1-11

ID: 3162Board: P1-13

ID: 3010Board: P1-14

Physics of Induced Earthquakes II

Jens-Erik Lund Snee (Stanford University)A second-generation stress map of the intraplate USA, and its utilization for managing the hazard of injection-induced seismi-city

Corentin Noël (EPFL Lausanne)Fault reactivation during pore pressure oscillations

Luca Urpi (Swiss Seismological Service)Can a deep geological repository in a clay formation maintain its integrity and still reactivate a nearby fault?

Marcel Schulz (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)Analysis of injection data for pore pressure and minimum hori-zontal stress magnitude estimates in the Arbuckle Formation

Victor Vilarrasa (Spanish National Research Council)Inhomogeneous fault stability due to fluid injection

Brecht Wassing (TNO)Modelling of long-term temperature effects on fault reactivation and induced seismicity potential in conventional geothermal dou-blets in The Netherlands

Ju Hyi Yim (Seoul National University)Coulomb Stress Changes by Fault Slip and Pore Pressure Push due to Fluid Injection

Session 6

ID: 3439Board: P2-01

Page 22: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

19

ID: 3028Board: P2-03

ID: 3034Board: P2-04

ID: 2968Board: P2-08

ID: 3351Board: P2-06

ID: 2955Board: P2-07

ID: 2969Board: P2-02

ID: 3407Board: P2-13

ID: 3320Board: P2-10

Modelling Induced Seismicity

Sebastian Anger (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München)Dynamic earthquake rupture modeling in fracture networks of geo-reservoirs accounting for the effects of thermal pressurizati-on

Amir Ashrafi Habibabadi (ETH Zurich)Numerical Simulation of Fracture Failure and Propagation due to Fluid Injection, in the Context of Embedded Discrete Fractures

Giuseppe De Natale (Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia)Seismogenic potential of withdrawal-reinjection cycles: numeri-cal modelling and implication on induced seismicity

Benjamin Edwards (University of Liverpool)A Hybrid Empirical Green’s Function Technique for Predicting Ground Motion from Induced Seismicity: Application to the Basel Enhanced Geothermal System

Dimitrios Karvounis (Swiss Seismological Service)Testing Injection Scenarios with a 3D Discrete Fracture Hybrid Model

Maria Kozłowska (Institute of Geophysics Polish Academy of Sciences)How to model aftershocks in induced seismicity? Insight into seis-micity of Kiruna Mine, Sweden

Maarten Pluymaekers (TNO)Depletion-induced seismicity at the Groningen gas field: Cou-lomb rate-and-state models for structurally complex reservoirs

Gudrun Richter (German Research Centre for Geosciences)Stress-based, statistical modeling of the induced seismicity at Groningen Gas Field

Session 7

Page 23: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

20

ID: 3166Board: P2-12

ID: 3060Board: P2-05

ID: 3064Board: P2-09

Vasily Riga (The Federal State Unitary Enterprise “All-Russia Research Institute of Automatics named after N.L. Dukhov”)Numerical Analysis Of Friction Laws. Application To Induced Seis-micity

Vanille Ariane Ritz (Swiss Seismological Service)Injection strategies for EGS: balancing seismic risk and stimula-tion efficiency

Justin Rubinstein (United States Geological Survey)Forecasts of Induced Seismicity and its Hazard from a Hydrome-chanical Earthquake Nucleation Model

Case studies II: panta rhei

No posters

Session 10

Page 24: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

21

Maps of Poster and Lecture Halls

Map of X-Ray Poster Hall

Map of Jugendstil Lobby Poster Hall

Legend

Schachzimmer

Jugendstil Lobby

Coffe

e 1

Coffe

e 2

X-Ray Room

to Lecture Hall

Piano Barto X-Ray Room

South Panoramic Windows and Terrace

to Piano Bar

Poster boardwith board ID

to S-Terrace

Get-together & chill-out area

Coffee 2Coffee, wine & cheese tables

to Jugendstil Lobby

P1-10 P1-11P1-07 P1-08

P1-14P1-13

P1-16P1-15

P1-18P1-17

P1-04P1-01

P1-05P1-02

P1-06P1-03

P2-06P2-01

P2-07P2-02

P2-08P2-03

P2-09P2-04

P2-10P2-05

P2-12

P2-11

P2-14

P2-13

P2-16

P2-15

P2-16

P1-15

P1-12P1-09

X-Ray Poster Hall

Legend

Map of X-Ray Poster Hall

Map of Jugendstil Lobby Poster Hall

Legend

Schachzimmer

Jugendstil Lobby

Coffe

e 1

Coffe

e 2

X-Ray Room

to Lecture Hall

Piano Barto X-Ray Room

South Panoramic Windows and Terrace

to Piano Bar

Poster boardwith board ID

to S-Terrace

Get-together & chill-out area

Coffee 2Coffee, wine & cheese tables

to Jugendstil Lobby

P1-10 P1-11P1-07 P1-08

P1-14P1-13

P1-16P1-15

P1-18P1-17

P1-04P1-01

P1-05P1-02

P1-06P1-03

P2-06P2-01

P2-07P2-02

P2-08P2-03

P2-09P2-04

P2-10P2-05

P2-12

P2-11

P2-14

P2-13

P2-16

P2-15

P2-16

P1-15

P1-12P1-09

Page 25: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

22

Map of X-Ray Poster Hall

Map of Jugendstil Lobby Poster Hall

Legend

Schachzimmer

Jugendstil Lobby

Coffe

e 1

Coffe

e 2

X-Ray Room

to Lecture Hall

Piano Barto X-Ray Room

South Panoramic Windows and Terrace

to Piano Bar

Poster boardwith board ID

to S-Terrace

Get-together & chill-out area

Coffee 2Coffee, wine & cheese tables

to Jugendstil Lobby

P1-10 P1-11P1-07 P1-08

P1-14P1-13

P1-16P1-15

P1-18P1-17

P1-04P1-01

P1-05P1-02

P1-06P1-03

P2-06P2-01

P2-07P2-02

P2-08P2-03

P2-09P2-04

P2-10P2-05

P2-12

P2-11

P2-14

P2-13

P2-16

P2-15

P2-16

P1-15

P1-12P1-09

Jugendstil Lobby Poster Hall

Page 26: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

23

List of ParticipantsLast update: 25 February 2019

Thorbjörg (Tobba) Ágústsdóttir Iceland GeoSurveyAndrés Alcolea Geo-Energie Suisse AGMichelle Almakari Mines ParisTechCelso Alvizuri University of LausanneAmandine Amemoutou German Research Centre for GeosciencesPablo Ampuero California Institute of Technology, USASebastian Anger Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenMaria-Theresia Apoloner Zentralanstalt fuer Meteorologie und GeodynamikAmir Ashrafi Habibabadi Institute of Fluid Dynamics, ETH ZurichBrian Baptie British Geological SurveyAndrew Barbour United States Geological SurveyDavid Barge TengizchevroilDario Baturan NanometricsStephan Bentz German Research Centre for GeosciencesFalko Bethmann Geo-Energie Suisse AGJens Birkholzer Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USAMarco Bohnhoff GFZ PotsdamNepomuk Boitz Free University BerlinJulian Bommer Imperial College LondonFelix Borleanu National Institute for Earth PhysicsStephen Bourne Shell Global Solutions International, The NetherlandsChris Bromley GNS ScienceLoes Buijze TNO UtrechtAntony Butcher University of BristolFrederic Cappa Université Côte d‘Azur, FranceNathalie Casas National Institute of Science LyonSimone Cesca German Research Centre for GeosciencesEnrique Chon University of ColoradoRaymi Castilla Geo-Energie Suisse AGCristiano Collettini Sapienza Università di RomaTorsten Dahm German Research Centre for GeosciencesGiuseppe De Natale Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e VulcnologiaPeter Devanney NanometricsTobias Diehl ETH ZurichMaria Cristina Dimate Castellanos EcopetrolJoseph Doetsch ETH ZurichDirk Doornhof Nederlandse Aardolie MaatschappijBernard Dost Royal Netherlands Meteorological InstituteGeorg Dresen German Research Centre for GeosciencesLaure Duboeuf NORSARBenjamin Edwards University of Liverpool

Page 27: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

24

Bill Ellsworth Stanford University, USATomas Fischer Charles University, Faculty of SciencePaul Friberg ISTIRalf Fritschen DMT GmbH & Co. KGAlice-Agnes Gabriel Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenMartin Galis Comenius University, BratislavaPercy Galvez Barron King Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyDomenico Giardini ETH ZurichThomas Goebel University of California at Santa Cruz, USABettina Goertz-Allmann NORSARPierre Gouédard Magnitude-BHGEAlan G. Green ETH ZurichFrancesco Grigoli ETH ZurichLaura Gulia Swiss Seismological Service at ETH ZurichMarcus Herrmann Swiss Seismological Service at ETH ZurichMarian Hertrich SCCER-SoEStephen Hicks Imperial College LondonGregor Hillers University of HelsinkiCaspar Hirschi University of St. GallenVala Hjorleifsdottir Reykjavik EnergyStephan Husen Kantonales Laboratorium Basel-StadtJan-Dirk Jansen Delft University of TechnologyGuoyan Jiang The Chinese University of Hong KongSigurjon Jonsson King Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyLisa Johann Freie Universität BerlinAndrew Jupe altcom LimitedSuyoung Kang Pusan National UniversitySepideh Karimi nanometrics incDimitrios Karvounis Swiss Seismological Service at ETH ZurichKwang-Hee Kim Pusan National UniversityJannes Kinscher INERISAdam Klinger University of BristolMaria Kozłowska Institute of Geophysics Polish Academy of SciencesGrzegorz Kwiatek German Research Centre for GeosciencesCorinne Lacave Résonance Ingénieurs-Conseils SAFederica Lanza University of Wisconsin-MadisonJean-Marc Lavanchy CSD Ingenieurs SABrice Lecampion EPFL LausanneDaniel Lienin Universität ZürichJose Angel Lopez-Comino King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

Page 28: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

25

Björn Lund Uppsala UniversityJens-Erik Lund Snee Stanford UniversityXiaodong Ma ETH ZurichClaudio Madonna Swiss Seismological Service at ETH ZurichMartin Mai 1968Christophe Maisons Magnitude-BHGEChris Marone Pennsylvania State UniversityHansruedi Maurer ETH Zürich Institute of GeophysicsArt McGarr United States Geological SurveyPeter Meier Geo-Energie Suisse AGChristian Minnig Federal Office of Topography swisstopoOmid Moradian ETH ZurichAndreas Mori EPFL LausanneYusuke Mukuhira Tohoku UniversityBirgit Müller Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyAnnemarie Muntendam-Bos SodM / Delft University of TechnologyTobias Neuffer DMT GmbH & Co. KGCorentin Noël EPFL LausanneAndy Nowacki University of LeedsAnne Obermann ETH ZurichStuart Oliver HolmesLani Oncescu Kinemetrics, Inc.Sander Osinga TNOKristine Pankow University of UtahFrancois Passelegue EPFL LausanneHanneke Paulssen Utrecht UniversityStefania Petroselli Eni SpAAntonio Petruccelli Geo-Energie Suisse AGKatrin Plenkers Gesellschaft für Material prüfung und GeophysikMaarten Pluymaekers TNOJin-Han Ree Korea UniversityGudrun Richter German Research Centre for GeosciencesVasily Riga The Federal State Unitary Enterprise “All-Russia Research Institute of Automatics named after N.L. Dukhov”Antonio Pio Rinaldi Swiss Seismological Service at ETH ZurichVanille Ariane Ritz Swiss Seismological Service at ETH ZurichFee-Alexandra Rodler Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und GeodynamikThomas Roeckel Piewak & Partner GmbHCorinna Roy University of LeedsJustin Rubinstein United States Geological SurveyTero Saarno ST1 Deep Heat Oy

Page 29: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

26

Marc Schaming Strasbourg University/CNRSBettina Scheu LMU MünchenBernd Schmidt Landesamt für Geologie und Bergbau Rheinland-PfalzJean Schmittbuhl Strasbourg University/CNRSJen Schneider Boise State UniversityStephan Schreiber Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbHAlex Schubnel École Normale Supérieure ParisIlka Schulz Erdwerk GmbHMarcel Schulz Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyMarco Scuderi Sapienza University of RomePaul Selvadurai Swiss Seismological Service at ETH ZurichFrancisco Serbeto Ibanez Geo-Energie Suisse AGGunter Siddiqi Swiss Federal Office of EnergyNorman Sieroka ETH ZurichVerena Simon Swiss Seismological Service at ETH ZurichManuel Sintubin Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, BelgiumRob Skoumal United States Geological SurveyKatja Thiemann Erdwerk GmbHEvelina Trutnevyte University of GenevaSergey Turuntaev Institute of Geosphere Dynamics of Russian Academy of SciencesLuca Urpi Swiss Seismological Service at ETH ZurichPeter van den Bogert ShellRob van Eijs Nederlandse Aardolie MaatschappijJan van Elk Nederlandse Aardolie MaatschappijVictor Vilarrasa Spanish National Research CouncilLinus Villiger ETH ZurichNatascha Vollmer K-UTEC AG Salt TechnologiesRobert Vörös Q-con GmbHTommi Vuorinen University of HelsinkiBrecht Wassing TNOStefan Wiemer Swiss Seismological Service at ETH ZurichClay Wood Pennsylvania State UniversityZhuo Yang Harvard UniversityJu Hyi Yim Seoul National UniversityHwajung Yoo Seoul National UniversityDominik Zbinden Swiss Seismological Service at ETH ZurichWen Zhou Utrecht UniversityOlivier Zingg Geo-Energie Suisse AGBenjamin Zürcher Geo Explorers AG

Page 30: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal

27

Sponsors

Organizing Committee

– Stefan Wiemer Director of the Swiss Seismological Service SED – Toni Kraft Senior Seismologist at the SED – Barbara Naegeli Communications Specialist at the SED

Contact: [email protected]

Page 31: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal
Page 32: km deep Enhanced Geothermal System in Finland Solicited: Andrew Barbour (United States Geological Survey) Slow Deformation and Rapid Seismicity-Rate Changes Triggered by Geothermal