internet channel - journal from emerald

Upload: shafiqdanial

Post on 04-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 internet channel - journal from emerald

    1/17

    European Journal of MarketingEmerald Article: Internet channel and perceived cannibalization: Scaledevelopment and validation in a personal selling context

    Dheeraj Sharma, Jule B. Gassenheimer

    Article information:

    To cite this document: Dheeraj Sharma, Jule B. Gassenheimer, (2009),"Internet channel and perceived cannibalization: Scale

    evelopment and validation in a personal selling context", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 43 Iss: 7 pp. 1076 - 1091

    Permanent link to this document:

    ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560910961524

    Downloaded on: 05-10-2012

    References: This document contains references to 65 other documents

    Citations: This document has been cited by 4 other documents

    To copy this document: [email protected]

    This document has been downloaded 975 times since 2009. *

    Users who downloaded this Article also downloaded: *

    Franois Des Rosiers, Jean Dub, Marius Thriault, (2011),"Do peer effects shape property values?", Journal of Property

    nvestment & Finance, Vol. 29 Iss: 4 pp. 510 - 528

    ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14635781111150376

    Hui Chen, Miguel Baptista Nunes, Lihong Zhou, Guo Chao Peng, (2011),"Expanding the concept of requirements traceability: The role

    f electronic records management in gathering evidence of crucial communications and negotiations", Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 63

    ss: 2 pp. 168 - 187

    ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00012531111135646

    Charles Inskip, Andy MacFarlane, Pauline Rafferty, (2010),"Organising music for movies", Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 62 Iss: 4 pp.

    89 - 501

    ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00012531011074726

    Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

    For Authors:

    f you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service.

    nformation about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit

    www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.

    About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com

    With over forty years' experience, Emerald Group Publishing is a leading independent publisher of global research with impact in

    usiness, society, public policy and education. In total, Emerald publishes over 275 journals and more than 130 book series, as

  • 7/29/2019 internet channel - journal from emerald

    2/17

    Internet channel and perceivedcannibalization

    Scale development and validation in a personalselling context

    Dheeraj SharmaCentre for Innovative Management, Athabasca University,

    St Albert, Canada, and

    Jule B. GassenheimerCrummer Graduate School of Business, Rollins College, Winter Park,

    Florida, USA

    Abstract

    Purpose The purpose of this paper is multifold. First, this study aims to proffer a psychometricscale to measure sales agents perception of sales cannibalization due to the addition of an internetchannel. Second, the study seeks to estimate the downstream impact of sales agents perceivedcannibalization (SPC) on two outcomes, namely, commitment and alienation from work. Third, it aimsto examine the moderating role of environmental munificence in the relationship between SPC and thetwo outcomes.

    Design/methodology/approach The data for this study were collected from a contact pool of2,108 insurance sales agents. A total of 511 valid responses were attained. Structural equationmodeling was employed to examine the relationships posited in this study.

    Findings First, a multi-item scale was conceptualized and developed for measuring SPC. Second, theproperties of the scale were assessed following procedures recommended by Churchill, Anderson,

    Gerbing, Bagozzi, and Yi. The scale demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity. Third, SPC wasshown to be not universally damaging to commitment. Rather, only under a low munificent environmentdoes perceived cannibalization significantly reduce salespersons commitment. Additionally, the severityof the influence of SPC on alienation from work increases in low munificent environment.

    Research limitations/implications The data for this study were collected using a single surveyof insurance agents. Future researchers should attempt to examine the relationships posited in thisstudy using a sample from a different industry.

    Practical implications While recognizing that the internet is here to stay and that strategicchannel decisions will unlikely be made based on the views or psychological reactions of sales agentsalone, incorporating the sales agent perspective does allow organizations to take a holistic view of theirdistribution system. This may be particularly important in view of multi-channel marketing, when anew marketing channel is employed to co-exist with the traditional sales force.

    Originality/value Previous conceptualizations of inter-channel cannibalization were all based oneconomic terms and, hence, were considered myopic by Porter. This study examines the psychologicalinfluence of the addition of an internet channel on sale agents work related outcomes.

    Keywords Sales, Job satisfaction, Marketing strategy, Sales force, Innovation

    Paper type Research paper

    The oldest and strongest emotion of mankind is fear (H.P. Lovecraft).

    The dawn of the internet era has led several companies to explore new and radicalmarketing channels. In fact, multi-channel use has become the norm rather than the

    The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at

    www.emeraldinsight.com/0309-0566.htm

    EJM43,7/8

    1076

    Received June 2007Revised January 2008,July 2008Accepted September 2008

    European Journal of Marketing

    Vol. 43 No. 7/8, 2009

    pp. 1076-1091

    q Emerald Group Publishing Limited

    0309-0566

    DOI 10.1108/03090560910961524

  • 7/29/2019 internet channel - journal from emerald

    3/17

    exception (Frazier, 1999). By adding internet channels, companies hope to increaseoverall performance, consolidate existing markets and expand into new markets(Geyskens et al., 2002). Unfortunately, internet channels are not without potentialproblems: internet channels are likely to increase uncertainty about market allegiance,

    generating real risks for long-term business performance (Geyskens et al., 2002), aswell as destroying the value of past investments (Chandy and Tellis, 1998). As Porter(2001, p. 73) promulgates, it is widely assumed that the internet is cannibalistic [and]will replace [or supplement] all conventional ways of doing business.

    Furthermore, Trembly (2001) suggests that the ubiquity of the internet will result inlower commissions for sales agents and gradual attrition of sales agents. Inconcurrence, Stucker (1999) found that 60 percent of the carriers surveyed view theweb as at least a moderate threat to the agent distribution system (p. 8). This findingis corroborated by Hagerty (2005), who suggests that web-based brokerage firms havecompletely shaken up the real estate industry, thus, creating paranoia for thetraditional real-estate agents. Hagerty (2005) describes the traditional real estateagents perceptions of the internet channel as exasperating, demotivating, andcannibalistic in nature. In their study of the insurance industry, Eastman et al. (2002)found that insurance agents experiencing the addition of an internet channel feltinsecure about their job. While the internet provides easier communication andincreases interactions with customers, the internet also provides multiple options forinsurance purchasers, thus increasing the chances of sales cannibalization. This trendhas been confirmed by extant research, which suggests that the internet will continueto attract consumers, breed uncertainty, and undoubtedly change sales agentsperceptions of job security as well as their job performance (Frazier, 1999; Greenhalghand Rosenblatt, 1984).

    Primarily working with economic and financial terms, marketing researchers haveconceptualized cannibalization and assert that, in fact, the addition of internet channels

    may not generate significant cannibalization (Biyalogorsky and Naik, 2003; Chandyand Tellis, 1998; Deleersnyder et al., 2002; Ward and Morganosky, 2000). Others,however, contend that even if the financial impact is inconsequential, the psychologicalimpact of cannibalization can influence marketers performance outcomes (Geyskenset al., 2002). In this regard, Porter (2001) posits that salespeople fear internet channeladditions in anticipation that the Internet will cannibalize their sales. In addition,salespeople worry that internet channels will make them outmoded and eventuallyreplace them. Elsewhere, Frazier (1999) contends that, regardless of the extent of actualcannibalization, sales agents fears concerning cannibalization and the security of their

    jobs can subdue their efforts, breakdown long-standing relationships, reduce theircommitment, and make them fearful of an uncertain future (see also Ashford et al.,1989; Gerstner and Hess, 1995; Greenhalgh and Rosenblatt, 1984; Jeuland and Shugan,

    1983; Lal et al., 1996; McGuire and Staelin, 1983).This negative influence of perceived cannibalization on sales agents job outcomes

    and relationships often offset the potential gains (e.g., increased market penetrationand decreased distribution cost) from adding internet channels (Porter, 2001).Although past researchers have emphasized the importance of perceivedcannibalization as a determinant of the benefits and risks of adding an internetchannel and the consequences of job insecurity, empirical research on cannibalizationin the marketing literature remains scant, apart from the study by Gulati et al. (2002),

    Internet channeland perceived

    cannibalization

    1077

  • 7/29/2019 internet channel - journal from emerald

    4/17

    which was focusing on the fear of disintermediation felt by sales agents. Gulati et al.(2002) position fear of disintermediation as an endogenous variable. In contrast, thecurrent study positions the SPC as an exogenous variable that influences the salesagents psychological outcomes.

    The organizational behavior literature has found similar outcome variables to besignificantly related to job insecurity the perceived powerlessness to maintaindesired continuity in a threatening job situation (Greenhalgh and Rosenblatt, 1984,p. 438). According to Greenhalgh and Rosenblatt (1984), one of the key reasons for jobinsecurity is the potential shrinkage of jobs due to external changes. Within the contextof our study, individual perception of shrinkage (cannibalization) is attributed to anexternal change brought about by the internet. Gulati et al. (2002) conceptualized thefear of disintermediation as a perception of complete loss of business. Ourconceptualization of perceived cannibalization captures the subjective threat, which isthe consequent of an objective threat. The individuals perceptual processes capture thesubjective threat from the addition of an internet channel.

    This study aims to develop a scale that can be used to measure sales agentsperceived cannibalization of their earnings due to the addition of an internet channel.We establish the conceptual foundation for the scale and the scales ability todemonstrate acceptable psychometric properties. The scale is then applied in thecontext of sales agents perception of the addition of internet channels. By doing so, thedownstream outcomes of SPC on commitment and alienation from work can bemodeled. While a job insecurity scale may have been used to capture the perceivedpowerlessness of the situation, existing job insecurity scales assess multiple features of

    job insecurity that are not relevant to our study. Job insecurity scales also do not tapinto perceived threats from competing channels (cf. Ashford et al., 1989; Mauno et al.,2001). Lastly, this research study also argues that the influence of perceivedcannibalization on sales agent job outcomes may also be contingent upon the state of

    environmental munificence, which refers to the extent of growth opportunitiesavailable in the market.

    Uncertainty reduction theory (Berger, 1979, 1986; Planalp and Honeycutt, 1985;Shannon and Weaver, 1949), the expectancy theory of motivation (Vroom, 1964), andcongruity theory (Osgood and Tannenbaum, 1955) are used to ground the research.Uncertainty reduction theory explicates how the addition of alternatives in a givensituation results in increased uncertainty and how these additions may be perceived ascannibalistic (cf. Berger and Calabrese, 1975; Heider, 1958). The expectancy theory ofmotivation argues that a high level of perceived cannibalization is likely to decrease asales agents belief that expending a given amount of effort will result in correspondingreward, thus, resulting in alienation from work (Vroom, 1964). Congruity theorysuggests that the lack of expectation that effort will result in appropriate rewards could

    result in reduced commitment and increased alienation from work (Osgood andTannenbaum, 1955).

    Specifically, this research offers a deeper understanding of the influence of theaddition of the internet channel on sales agents motivation. While recognizing that theinternet is here to stay and that strategic channel decisions will unlikely be made basedon the views or psychological reactions of sales agents alone, incorporating the salesagent perspective does allow organizations to take a holistic view of their distributionsystem and make market-focused improvements that coordinate all customer touch

    EJM43,7/8

    1078

  • 7/29/2019 internet channel - journal from emerald

    5/17

    points (Vargo and Lusch, 2004). In other words, understanding a sales agents perceivedcannibalization can aid managers in developing strategies to keep the sales agentsmotivated when employing multiple competing marketing channels to reach customers.

    Conceptual frameworkAlthough there is surprisingly little empirical work on channel cannibalization, severalresearchers have expressed their concerns for the hazards of internet disintermediation(e.g. Garven, 2002; Gulati et al., 2002; Narayandas et al., 2002); a situation in whichinternet channels are added to entrenched channels (e.g. Alba et al., 1997; Brynjolfssonand Smith, 2000; Coughlan et al., 2001). Internet disintermediation results in thereplacement of traditional channel partners with the Internet (Narayandas et al., 2002).This phenomenon fortifies the common belief that internet channels potentiallycannibalize the sales of entrenched channels (Porter, 2001).

    First, sales may shift from entrenched channels to new internet channels when thelatter provides features that are more appealing to a target audience, such as a

    substantial amount of information on the products characteristics, their possiblecustomization and consistent time savings (Alba et al., 1997). Second, the Internet islikely to increase competition since the consumers have better and quicker access toefficient shopping comparison websites. The resulting increase in price competition mayexplain why online prices for homogenous products are often found to be lower thanthose of conventional outlets (Brynjolfsson and Smith, 2000). Consequently, sales mayshift from conventional to internet channels. Third, total sales may also decrease shouldimpulse purchases be reduced (Machlis, 1998). Indeed, not only are sales of existingchannels cannibalized, but aggregate sales over all channels may also suffer because ofthe internet channel. Fourth, existing channels may view new internet channels asunwelcome competition. Consequently, the former may lose motivation and reducesupport for the firms products. This may, in turn, also result in brand switching towards

    the firms competitors and, hence, decreased total sales (Coughlan et al., 2001).In spite of the above observations and much current debate about disintermediation

    and insecurity generated by internet channels (Mattila, 2002; Useem, 1999), only ahandful of empirical studies have tangentially focused on the potentially cannibalizingconsequences of adding the internet to the distribution chain. As shown in Table I,previous empirical studies have viewed cannibalization in terms of its effect on thetotal sales or overall financial value of the firm. What has yet to be investigated is theimpact that perceptions of internet cannibalization have on the commitment and workalienation.

    This research study proffers the construct of sales agents perceivedcannibalization, which refers to salespeoples perceptions of the extent to whichsales opportunities are lost to an internet channel. SPC reflects an attitudinal reaction

    of a sales agent to challenges that may occur due to the addition of the internet channel.If sales agents view the addition of an internet channel by the firm as a high threat totheir current and future sales outcomes, perceived cannibalization should be high.Contrarily, if agents do not consider the addition of an internet channel by their firm asa menace to their current and future sales, perceived cannibalization should be low.Scholars have contended that when a firm begins selling through the Internet, salesagents selling through existing channels are likely to perceive losing market share andcustomers to online sales (Frazier, 1999; Narayandas et al., 2002; Porter, 2001).

    Internet channeland perceived

    cannibalization

    1079

  • 7/29/2019 internet channel - journal from emerald

    6/17

    Relationship commitment and its relationship with sales agents perceivedcannibalizationCommitment is an important component of marketing relationships (Morgan andHunt, 1994). Relationship commitment is defined in the literature as an enduringdesire to maintain a valued relationship (Morgan and Hunt, 1994, p. 23). In other

    words, relationship commitment captures sales agents willingness to maintain arelationship with their company. Plausibly, it can be argued that a channel member

    who is satisfied with the economical dimension of the relationship is also committed tothe relationship (Morgan and Hunt, 1994).

    Concurrent with the expectancy theory of motivation argument, this research

    contends a negative influence of SPC on sales agents relationship commitment.According to expectancy theory, individuals will be motivated if they believe that

    expending a given amount of effort on a task will lead to an improved level ofperformance on some dimensions (Futrell, 2001, p. 278). In contrast, if individualsbelieve their efforts will not produce expected results, motivation will suffer (Vroom,

    1964) along with these relationships. Thus, perceptions of high level of uncertainty inthe outcome of the sales agents effort result in a lack of interest in maintaining along-term relationship. Thus, the following is hypothesized:

    H1. SPC negatively influences sales agents relationship commitment.

    Author Publication Results

    Ward and Morganosky(2000)

    eCommerce ResearchForum, MIT

    It is a multiple-industry study assessing internetcannibalization by consumers channel usage

    pattern. Authors assessed consumers buyingand information search behaviors regarding agiven product within the past six months. Theresearchers assumed that if the primary source ofinformation was the internet, offline sales couldpossibly increase. However, online sales wouldnot necessarily increase if the primary source ofinformation was an offline medium (retail storeor catalog)

    Deleersnyder et al.(2002)

    International Journal ofResearch in Marketing

    Authors studied the effect of cannibalization inthe newspaper industry. The results suggest thatthe addition of Internet channels affects thecirculation of only a few newspapers. However,

    the authors conclude that the new channel isperceived to be a substitute for the traditionalchannel especially when there are few differencesbetween online and offline consumers

    Geyskens et al. (2002) Journal of Marketing Authors examined the total value implications ofthe addition of internet channels (as measured bystock market returns); the impact ofcannibalization on any specific distribution agentwas not assessed

    Table I.Extant research incannibalization

    EJM43,7/8

    1080

  • 7/29/2019 internet channel - journal from emerald

    7/17

    Alienation from work and its relationship with sales agents perceived cannibalizationAlienation from work refers to an attitude in which an employee expresses lack ofconcern about work and works with low enthusiasm (Moch, 1980). Particularly,alienation from work is a psychological separation from work due to a perceived

    mismatch between effort and outcome. In concurrence with past research, this studycontends that agents perception of sales cannibalization may lead to psychologicalseverance from work. This psychological severance results from the perception thatwork will bring sub-optimal outcomes (Moch, 1980).

    Furthermore, past research indicates that sales agents perceived cannibalization,due to the addition of an internet channel, increases uncertainty (Berger, 1979, 1986;Planalp and Honeycutt, 1985; Shannon and Weaver, 1949). The increased uncertaintyrelated to work or role in the organization may result in psychological detachment fromwork (Allen and LaFollette, 1977).

    Additionally, past research indicates that job insecurity influences work attitudes(Hellgren et al., 1999). In other words, individuals will not work optimally when their

    job is in jeopardy. The introduction of an internet channels should breed insecurity forsales agents who perceive the internet channel reduces their earning potential (Porter,2001). This view is supported by extant literature, suggesting that employees workingin an environment that engenders high job insecurity will experience a high level ofwork alienation (Blauner, 1964; Shepard, 1971). Consequently, sales agents perceptionof cannibalization may be positively linked to alienation from work:

    H2. SPC positively influences sales agents alienation from work.

    Environmental munificence and its moderating influenceEnvironmental munificence is foreseen to play a contingency role in relation toperceived cannibalizations influence on salesperson commitment (Celly and Frazier,1996). Our contention is rooted in past research on environmental munificence.Veliyath (1996) contends that it is easier for channel members to achieve their salesgoals in a high munificence environment rather than in a low munificenceenvironment. This is because business risk decreases and industry performanceincreases with an increase in environmental munificence. Munificence increases theopportunities for performance by providing many growth opportunities. Theseopportunities can reduce the perceived challenges associated with multiple channelsserving the same market. Consequently, salespeople working in an environment withhigh munificence may anticipate higher sales growth, which would make up for theloss of sales due to the introduction of an internet channel. However, in a lowmunificence environment, growth opportunities in the environment are limited; hence,the addition of an internet channel can further exacerbate the duress of salespersons.

    Consequently, the effect of perceived cannibalization on commitment and alienationwill be limited in a highly munificent environment, while in a minimally munificentenvironment, SPCs impact on commitment and alienation from the work relationshipwill be strong. This view concurs with Chisholm and Cummings (1979) who suggestthat environmental conditions may moderate the relationship between workcharacteristics and outcomes. Therefore:

    H3a. The relationship between SPC and commitment will be moderated byenvironmental munificence such that when environmental munificence is low

    Internet channeland perceived

    cannibalization

    1081

  • 7/29/2019 internet channel - journal from emerald

    8/17

    the relationship between perceived cannibalization and commitment will bestronger.

    H3b. The relationship between SPC and alienation from work will be moderated by

    environmental munificence such that when environmental munificence is lowthe relationship between perceived cannibalization and alienation from workwill be stronger.

    MethodScale developmentTo operationalize SPC, initially a pool of eight items was generated as the potentialmeasure (Churchill, 1979; DeVellis, 1991). These items were reviewed in an interviewformat by 20 insurance agents, who verified anxiety towards the introduction of anonline sales channel that would increase the competition and decrease their earnings. Apanel of three research survey experts who engage in research in this domain alsoreviewed the items. Considering the transcribed interviews of the insurance agents and

    comments of the research experts, the number of items was reduced to five.These items reflect the impact that the introduction of online channels might have

    on the insurance agents perception of their current and future sales performance.Specifically, the items relate to how the addition of an internet channel will beperceived by insurance agents as a likely driver of reduction in clientele and profits. Inother words, the measures are intended to describe insurance agents psychologicallyperception that their profits and growth opportunities are cannibalized by the additionof internet channels.

    After discussing the sample, the psychometric properties of the newly developedscale, perceived cannibalization are described. The scales used for measuringcommitment and environmental munificence are well-established in the literature.Specifically, a three-item relationship commitment scale developed by Kumar et al.

    (1995) is used in this study. The scale measures affective commitment of sales agentswith their insurance company. A four-item scale was used to measure alienation fromwork (Miller, 1967; Agarwal, 1993). We used Dwyer and Ohs (1987) five-item scale tomeasure environmental munificence. The scale measures an insurance salespersonsperception of market opportunities for growth and profit. The respondents werepresented with a factual scenario pertaining to the future of the insurance industry.After considering the scenario, respondents were asked to rate there perception ofgrowth opportunities.

    SampleA list of insurance agents in North Texas, which had been obtained through a privatevendor, was compared with the insurance agent listings in the yellow page section of

    greater Dallas-Fort Worth area and other major towns in North Texas. After thiscomparison, a contact pool of 2,108 insurance sales agents was developed. All 2,108sales agents were contacted to request their participation to the survey.

    The questionnaires and a letter elucidating the nature and purpose of the studywere mailed to the contact pool of insurance agents by the primary researcher of thisstudy. Of 578 filled questionnaires, 67 were incomplete, resulting in 511 usablequestionnaires (response rate 24.2 percent). There were 370 males and 141 femalerespondents, with an average work experience in the insurance industry of 7 years.

    EJM43,7/8

    1082

  • 7/29/2019 internet channel - journal from emerald

    9/17

    The resulting valid responses indicate that the respondents have the experience ininsurance industry to provide a basis to respond to the survey. Participation wascompletely voluntary. Valid respondent characteristics are reported in Table II.

    Measurement assessment proceduresFor the purpose of cross validation, data were randomly divided into two sub-samples,training and validation. Thirty percent of randomly drawn cases formed the trainingsample (n 150) and the remaining 70 percent constituted the validation sample(n 361). Initially, scale properties were assessed with the training sample and thencross-validated with the validation sample. In addition to the scale of SPC, three otherscales of theoretically related constructs, relationship commitment, alienation fromwork, and munificence, were included in the analyses. The analysis was initiated byconducting exploratory factor analysis on the training sample. Thereafter,confirmatory factor analysis was performed on the validation sample.

    Exploratory factor analysis. Using the principle component method and varimaxrotation, all 17 items belonging to 4 constructs were factor analyzed with the training

    sample (n 150). As expected, four factors emerged with eigenvalues of 4.652, 3.640,3.552, and 2.884 together accounting for 81.14 percent of the variance. All five items ofperceived cannibalization, three items of commitment, four items of alienation fromwork, and five items of environmental munificence loaded clearly with their respectiveconstructs. Factor loadings ranged from 0.612 to 0.966.

    Confirmatory factor analysis. Next confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with thevalidation sample (n 361) was conducted. The CFA model had 17 items 5 forperceived cannibalization, 3 for commitment, 4 for alienation from work, and 5 forenvironmental munificence. The initial model fit was not optimal. Based on low factorloading (lower than 0.40), high residual (normalized residual .2.58) and modificationindices, one item from the SPC scale and one item from environmental munificence

    Frequency %

    GenderMale 370 54.3Female 141 45.7Total 511 100

    Income ($)Less than 25,000 14 2.7Between 25,00 and 50,000 77 15.1Between 50,001 and 75,000 196 38.4Between 75,001 and 100,000 179 35.0Above 100,000 45 8.80

    Total 511 100

    Age18-25 33 6.4626-35 99 19.3736-45 237 46.3846-55 120 23.48,56 22 4.31Total 511 100

    Table II.Sample descriptive

    statistics

    Internet channeland perceived

    cannibalization

    1083

  • 7/29/2019 internet channel - journal from emerald

    10/17

    were deleted. The essence of the deleted items was retained by other items of theirrespective scale, that is, the content validity was not significantly reduced. Theresulting fit indices demonstrated a good fit: x2 109:409 (p 0:028; 62.4 percent ofthe variance explained), df 83, GFI 0:962, AGFI 0:944, CFI 0:99,

    RMSEA 0:

    029, PCLOSE 0:

    993, and HOELTERs 0.05 and 0.01 were 347 and382, respectively. The GFI and AGFI values of.0.90 and 0:90 were indicative of agood fit. Also, a RMSEA , 0.05 shows a good fit. The PCLOSE . 0.50 suggestsRMSEA is good. Lastly, Hoelters 0.05 and 0.01 indexes were,200 indicating that thevalidation sample size was adequate.

    Convergent and discriminant validity, AVE, and composite reliability . Results for thevalidation sample showed that all the critical ratios of all the indicators weresignificant (critical ratios .1.96, p , 0.05) and ranged from 6.764 to 96.716. Theseresults were taken as evidence of acceptable convergent validity (Gerbing andAnderson, 1988). The composite reliabilities were 0.905, 0.834, 0.930, and 0.864,respectively, while the average variance extracted (AVE) for the constructs of SPC,commitment, alienation from work, and environmental munificence were 0.706, 0.627,0.772, and 0.615, respectively (Bagozzi and Yi, 1988) (see Table III). The AVE for eachfactor exceeded the squared correlations between that factor and all other factorsindicating acceptable discriminant validity. Additionally, none of the confidenceintervals ( two standards errors) for the estimated correlations for the constructsincluded 1.0, providing further support for adequate discriminant validity (Andersonand Gerbing, 1988).

    Common method bias. Since the data for this study were obtained from a singlesurvey, common method variance was possible. Following Podsakoff and Organ(1986), the Harmans one-factor test in which all variables were hypothesized to load ona single factor representing the common method was employed. The principalcomponent factor analysis revealed four factors each with an eigenvalue greater than

    1.0. All factors together accounted for over 81 percents of the total variance in thetraining and validation samples respectively. The first factor accounted for 28 percentof the variance. Additionally, high correlation (r . 0.90) was not found between anyconstruct. Bagozzi et al. (1991) indicate that the presence of common method biasusually results in extremely high correlations between variables. Hence, commonmethod bias may not be a serious concern in this study.

    Non-response bias. To examine the non-response bias, mean responses from earlyrespondents and late respondents were compared (Armstrong and Overton, 1977).Independent t-tests of the mean responses on all the four constructs showed nostatistical differences (at 0.05 level), thus, non-response bias should not be a problem.

    Hypotheses test

    In order to test the hypotheses, a structural model with four constructs wasestimated: SPC, the interaction term of SPC and environmental munificence(SPC *EM), alienation from work, and commitment. We followed the procedurerecommended by Aiken and West (1991) and Ping (1995) for creating and using theinteraction term. The items of SPC and environmental munificence were meancentered and cross-multiplied to create the interaction term. In the proposed model,commitment and alienation are endogenous, whereas the remaining two constructsare exogenous. The structural model was analyzed with the combined sample of 511

    EJM43,7/8

    1084

  • 7/29/2019 internet channel - journal from emerald

    11/17

    cases. The fit indices demonstrated a reasonable fit: x2 288:556 (p , 0.001; 60.2percent of the variance explained), df 86, GFI 0:931, AGFI 0:903, CFI 0:96,NFI 0:944, RMSEA 0:058. Even though the direction of the path was negativeas per H1, SPC! commitment link was not significant (estimate 20:031,

    t 20:

    877, p-value 0:

    381). That is, H1 was not supported. Thus, no main effectof SPC on commitment was found. The SPC ! alienation from work link wassignificant (estimate 0:068, t 1:981, p-value 0:045). Thus, H2 was supported.Further, the SPC *EM ! commitment link (estimate 0:067, t 2:475,p-value 0:013) and SPC *EM! alienation from work link (estimate 20:064,t 22:767, p-value 0:006) were both significant, thus, supporting H3a and H3b.Consequently, the influence of SPC on commitment and alienation from work ismoderated by environmental munificence. The results are summarized in Table IV.

    ItemStandardized

    loadings Alpha CR AVE

    Sales agents perceived cannibalization 0.897 0.905 0.707

    The internet attracts a large number of insurance buyers aI am losing market share to internet insurance sales 0.715Large number of my present and future customer may insteadchoose to shop for insurance online 0.798I think I am losing a large number of customers to competinginternet channel 0.917I think I could sell more insurance if my company did not sellinsurance online 0.956

    Environmental munificence 0.949 0.834 0.627My own opportunity for sales volume will be 0.776My own opportunity for sales growth will be 0.792My own opportunity for profit growth will be 0.832My own opportunity to recruit other agents will likely be a

    The number of individuals who choose a career as an agent inthe insurance industry will be 0.882

    Relationship commitment 0.897 0.929 0.773I have little, if any, emotional attachment to my insurancecompany 0.793It is a pleasure to deal with my insurance company 0.792I really enjoy working with my insurance company 0.820

    Alienation from work 0.845Selling insurance for my company provides me anopportunity to excel 0.990I really do not feel a sense of pride or accomplishment as aresult of selling insurance for my company 0.956I am proud to have done well in selling insurance for mycompany 0.599Selling insurance for my company is a rewarding experience 0.894 0.864 0.615

    Notes: Chi-square 109.409; df 83; p 0.028; GFI 0.962; AGFI 0.944; NFI 0.962;CFI 0.990; RMSEA 0.03; a deleted item

    Table III.Reliability and validity

    statistics

    Internet channeland perceived

    cannibalization

    1085

  • 7/29/2019 internet channel - journal from emerald

    12/17

    Discussion and conclusionIn this study, the concept of perceived cannibalization is tested in a sales context. Manypast studies suggested the possibility of the rise of sales agent perceivedcannibalization due to the addition of internet channels (Hagerty, 2005; Porter, 2001).Some warnings are evident with respect to the potential negative outcomes of salesagents perceived cannibalization on various job aspects. Anecdotal evidence hassurfaced showing that salespersons are perceiving internet channels as cannibalistic totheir current and future sales. Yet no attempt had been made to either conceptualize oroperationalize the construct of sales agents perceived cannibalization.

    Previous conceptualizations of inter-channel cannibalization were all based on

    economic terms (Geyskens et al., 2002; Ward and Morganosky, 2000; Deleersnyder et al.,2002) and, hence, were considered myopic by Porter (2001). Indeed, Porter (2001)argued that the psychological impact of the addition of new channels on existingchannels had to be taken into account to understand fully the impact of salescannibalization. Our contention follows Porters proposition and extends hisconceptualizations of cannibalization by examining the impact of the addition of aninternet channel in the sales domain.

    After conceptualizing the construct, a multi-item scale was developed for measuringsales agents perceived cannibalization. The properties of the scale were assessedfollowing procedures recommended by Churchill (1979), Anderson and Gerbing (1988),Gerbing and Anderson (1988), and Bagozzi and Yi (1988). This study, utilizes bothexploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to assess the reliability and validity of

    the SPC scale. Our scale opens a window of opportunity for empirical research onchannel cannibalization in general and sales channels in particular.

    In addition to advancing the scale, four hypotheses are developed, centering on theprincipal construct: sales agents perceive cannibalization. By demonstrating thatenvironmental munificence moderates the effect of perceived cannibalization oncommitment, this research study demonstrates that perceived cannibalization is notuniversally damaging to relationship commitment. Rather, only under a lowmunificent environment perceived cannibalization will significantly reduce

    Fit indices Coefficient t-value p-value

    Chi square 288.558df 86

    GFI 0.931AGFI 0.903CFI 0.960IFI 0.960NFI 0.944RMSEA 0.058SPC! COM (H1) 20.031 20.877 0.381SPC! AFW (H2) 0.068 1.981 0.045SPC *EM! COM (H3a) 0.067 2.475 0.013SPC *EM! AFW (H3b) 20.064 22.767 0.006

    Notes: SPC: Sales agents perceived cannibalization; SPC *EM: Interaction term for estimatingmoderating effect of environmental munificence (EM); COM: Relationship commitment

    Table IV.Structural model results

    EJM43,7/8

    1086

  • 7/29/2019 internet channel - journal from emerald

    13/17

    salespersons relationship commitment. Furthermore, perceived cannibalizationincreases alienation from work but its effect is more severe in low munificentenvironment.

    Implications for sales agentsThis research study demonstrated that the perception of cannibalization can reducesales agents commitment to relationships with their company in a low munificenceenvironment. In addition, it can enhance alienation from work, which may result in lowperformance outcomes in the long run. Consequently, the view that the internet channelwill not cannibalize sales (Deleersnyder et al., 2002) is myopic.

    It may be possible for salespersons to transform their negative perceptions ofcannibalization into motivators. Specifically, while internet channels providecustomers easy access to the core business processes such as quotations, policyissuance, and claims, salespersons may be able to develop high levels of competenciesin areas that internet channels cannot easily learn. For example, a sales agent may be

    able to respond to requests (e.g. from brokers for a quote) and make requests (e.g. toreinsurers for a confirmation of coverage) using electronic channels as tools to carryout decision-making and communication tasks that are unique to the agents skill set.Thereby, even under a low munificence environment, salespersons may overcome thestress of perceived cannibalization of internet channels.

    Leonard-Barton (1995) contends that sales agents who are committed to an existingbusiness structure may show a more anxious reaction towards the introduction of anew channel such as the internet. Consequently, these sales agents who have highcommitment to the existing format could have a stronger perception of cannibalizationthan that of those who have less commitment to the existing business format. Thus,future researchers may explore the moderating effect of commitment to the existingbusiness format in the relationship between SPC and the indicators of salespersons

    performance.

    Implications for firmsOne of the objectives of this study is to offer prescriptive and descriptive insights tofirms regarding perceived cannibalization and its possible consequences on salesagents motivation. Specifically, when firms operate in environments thatcharacteristically offer few sales opportunities, appropriate measures should betaken to counteract salespersons perceptions of cannibalization. For example, a firmcould design effective incentive systems to reduce the negative feelings towardscompeting internet channels. One way of doing so is to provide incentives to salesagents who provide service to clients who have purchased insurance online. Anotheroption is to train salespersons on how to make the internet beneficial to their own sales

    operations. Since changes often necessitate acquisition of new skills, alteration insalespersons repertoire and adaptability to cope (Ingram et al., 2006; Schuler andHuber, 1993) will become key determinants of whether the new channel helps orhinders the goals of sales agents. Therefore, training salespersons to adapt to changemay be critical to the overall success of both new and entrenched channels. Furtherresearch may investigate the role of salesperson training and salesperson collaborationin the development of internet channels as they relate to sales agents perceivedcannibalization and its impact.

    Internet channeland perceived

    cannibalization

    1087

  • 7/29/2019 internet channel - journal from emerald

    14/17

    In view of multi-channel business models followed by the large number ofcompanies today, the jury is still out regarding the efficiency of the integration ofoff-line and on-line selling activities. In this backdrop, the role of sales agentsperceived cannibalization in the integration of off-line and on-line channels needs

    further exploration. The SPC scale proffered in this study should facilitate empiricalresearch on this important phenomenon. The findings of this study should provideencouragement for further investigation of the antecedents and consequences of theSPC construct.

    Limitations and future researchOne major limitation of this study is that the data used in this study to develop andvalidate the scale was from a single sample of insurance agents. Typically, separatesamples are required for examining the psychometric properties of a new scale. Bollen(1989) contends that a new data set can be obtained by randomly dividing the initialdata pool into two. However, future research may validate the scale using a newsample. Additionally, the results of this study may lack external validity because thesample used in this study is industry specific. Future research may also examine therelationship posited in this study by using data from a different industry.

    Our failure to find a direct influence of SPC on commitment presents anotherresearch opportunity; that being the possibility of other intervening variables. Pastresearch indicates that salespersons skills and competencies are critical determinantsof salespersons performance outcomes (Churchill et al., 1985). Consequently, futureresearch may explore the intervening role of salespersons skills and competenciesbetween SPC and performance outcomes. Additionally, there also may be differencesacross sex, age, and experience for the relationships posited in this study.

    References

    Agarwal, S. (1993), Influence of formalization on role stress, organizational commitment, andwork alienation of salespersons: a cross-national comparative study, Journal of

    International Business Studies, Vol. 24 No. 4, p. 715.

    Aiken, L.S. and West, S.G. (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions,Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

    Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C., Lutz, R., Sawyer, A. and Wood, S. (1997), Interactivehome shopping: consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate inelectronic marketplaces, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 61 No. 3, pp. 38-53.

    Allen, B.H. and LaFollette, W.R. (1977), Perceived organizational structure and alienationamong management trainees, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 20 No. 2,pp. 334-41.

    Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1988), Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and

    recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103 No. 3, pp. 411-23.

    Armstrong, J.S. and Overton, T.S. (1977), Establishing nonresponse bias in mail surveys,Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 396-402.

    Ashford, S.J., Lee, C. and Bobko, P. (1989), Content, causes, and consequences of job insecurity: atheory-based measure and substantive test, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32No. 4, pp. 803-29.

    Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, Y. (1988), On the evaluation of structural equation model, Journal of theAcademy of Marketing Science, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 74-94.

    EJM43,7/8

    1088

  • 7/29/2019 internet channel - journal from emerald

    15/17

    Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y. and Phillips, L.W. (1991), Assessing construct validity in organizational

    research, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36, pp. 421-58.

    Berger, C.R. (1979), Beyond initial interaction: uncertainty, understanding, and the development

    of interpersonal relationships, in Giles, H. and St Clair, R. (Eds), Language and Social

    Psychology, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 122-44.

    Berger, C.R. (1986), Uncertain outcome values in predicted relationships: uncertainty reduction

    theory then and now, Human Communication Research, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 34-8.

    Berger, C.R. and Calabrese, R.J. (1975), Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond:

    toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication, Human CommunicationResearch, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 99-112.

    Biyalogorsky, E. and Naik, P. (2003), Clicks and mortar: the effect of online activities on offline

    sales, Marketing Letters, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 21-32.

    Blauner, R. (1964), Alienation and Freedom, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Bollen, K.A. (1989), Structural Equations with Latent Variables, John Wiley & Sons, New York,NY.

    Brynjolfsson, E. and Smith, M.D. (2000), Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet andconventional retailers, Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 563-85.

    Celly, K.S. and Frazier, G.L. (1996), Outcome-based and behaviour-based coordination efforts in

    channel relationships, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 200-10.

    Chandy, R.K. and Tellis, G.J. (1998), Organizing for radical product innovation: the overlooked

    role of willingness to cannibalize, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 474-87.

    Chisholm, R.F. and Cummings, T.G. (1979), Job characteristics, alienation, and work-related

    behavior: a study of professional employees, Journal of Management, Vol. 5 No. 1,pp. 57-70.

    Churchill, G.A. (1979), A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs,

    Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 64-73.

    Churchill, G.A., Ford, N.M., Walker, O.C. and Hartley, S.W. (1985), The determinants ofsalesperson performance: a meta-analysis, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 22 No. 2,pp. 103-18.

    Coughlan, A.T., Anderson, E., Stern, L.W. and El-Ansary, A.I. (2001), Marketing Channels,Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Deleersnyder, B., Geyskens, I., Gielens, K. and Dekimpe, M.G. (2002), How cannibalistic is the

    internet channel? A study of the newspaper industry in the United Kingdom and TheNetherlands, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 337-49.

    DeVellis, R.F. (1991), Scale Development: Theory and Applications, 2nd ed., Sage Publications,Newbury Park, CA.

    Dwyer, R.F. and Oh, S. (1987), Output sector munificence effects on the internal political

    economy of marketing channels, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 347-58.Eastman, J.K., Eastman, A.D. and Eastman, K.L. (2002), Insurance sales agents and the internet:

    the relationship between opinion leadership, subjective knowledge and Internet attitudes,

    Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 18 Nos 3/4, pp. 259-86.

    Frazier, G.L. (1999), Organizing and managing channels of distribution, Journal of the Academyof Marketing Science, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 226-40.

    Futrell, C.M. (2001), Sales Management Teamwork, Leadership, and Technology, 6th ed.,South-Western, Cincinnati, OH.

    Internet channeland perceived

    cannibalization

    1089

  • 7/29/2019 internet channel - journal from emerald

    16/17

    Garven, J.R. (2002), On the implications of the internet for insurance markets and institutions,Risk Management and Insurance Review, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 105-16.

    Gerbing, D.W. and Anderson, J.C. (1988), An updated paradigm for scale developmentincorporating unidimensionality and its assessment, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 25 No. 1,

    pp. 186-92.Gerstner, E. and Hess, J.D. (1995), Pull promotions and channel coordination, Marketing

    Science, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 43-60.

    Geyskens, I., Gielens, K. and Dekimpe, M.G. (2002), The market valuation of internet channeladditions, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66 No. 2, pp. 102-20.

    Greenhalgh, L. and Rosenblatt, Z. (1984), Job insecurity: toward conceptual clarity, Academy ofManagement Review, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 438-48.

    Gulati, R., Bristow, D. and Dou, W. (2002), A three-tier model representing the impact of internetuse and other environmental and relationship-specific factors on a sales agents fear ofdisintermediation due to the internet medium, Journal of Marketing Channels, Vol. 9Nos 3/4, pp. 49-86.

    Hagerty, J.R. (2005), Crowded house: discount real-estate brokers spark a war over commission,Wall Street Journal, No. 245, p. 1.

    Heider, F. (1958), The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York,NY.

    Hellgren, J., Sverke, M. and Isaksson, K. (1999), A two-dimensional approach to job insecurity:consequences for employee attitudes and well-being, European Journal of Work andOrganizational Psychology, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 179-95.

    Ingram, T.N., LaForge, R.W., Avila, R.A., Schwepker, C.H. Jr and Williams, M.R. (2006), SalesManagement: Analysis and Decision Making, 6th ed., Thomas South-Western, Mason, OH.

    Jeuland, A.P. and Shugan, S.M. (1983), Managing channel profits, Marketing Science, Vol. 2No. 3, pp. 239-72.

    Kumar, N., Scheer, L.K. and Steenkamp, J.B.E.M. (1995), The effect of supplier fairness on

    vulnerable resellers, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 54-65.

    Lal, R., Little, J.D. and Villas-Boas, J.M. (1996), A theory of forward buying, merchandising andtrade deals, Marketing Science, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 21-37.

    Leonard-Barton, D. (1995), Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources ofInnovation, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.

    McGuire, T.W. and Staelin, R. (1983), An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream verticalintegration, Marketing Science, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 161-91.

    Machlis, S. (1998), Channel conflicts stall web sales, Computerworld, Vol. 32 No. 7, p. 2.

    Mattila, M. (2002), Introducing existing financial services over new electronic channels,International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 431-48.

    Mauno, S., Leskinen, E. and Kinnunen, U. (2001), Multi-wave, multi-variable models of job

    insecurity: applying different scales in studying the stability of job insecurity, Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, Vol. 22 No. 8, pp. 919-38.

    Miller, G.A. (1967), Professionals in bureaucracy: alienation among industrial scientists andengineers, American Sociological Review, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 755-68.

    Moch, M.K. (1980), Racial differences in job satisfaction: testing four common explanations,Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 65 No. 3, pp. 299-306.

    Morgan, R.M. and Hunt, S.D. (1994), The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing,Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 No. 3, pp. 20-38.

    EJM43,7/8

    1090

  • 7/29/2019 internet channel - journal from emerald

    17/17

    Narayandas, D., Caravella, M. and Deighton, J. (2002), The impact of internet exchanges onbusiness-to-business distribution, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 30No. 4, pp. 500-5.

    Osgood, C.E. and Tannenbaum, P.H. (1955), The principle of congruity in the prediction of

    attitude change, Psychological Review, Vol. 62 No. 1, pp. 42-55.Ping, R. (1995), A parsimonious estimating technique for interaction and quadratic latent

    variables, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 291-300.

    Planalp, S. and Honeycutt, J.M. (1985), Events that increase uncertainty in personalrelationships, Human Communication Research, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 593-604.

    Podsakoff, P.M. and Organ, D.W. (1986), Self-reports in organizational research: problems andprospects, Journal of Management, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 531-44.

    Porter, M.E. (2001), Strategy and internet, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79 No. 3, pp. 62-79.

    Schuler, R.S. and Huber, V.L. (1993),Personnel and Human Resource Management, West, St Paul,MN.

    Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W. (1949), The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University

    of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.Shepard, J. (1971), Automation and Alienation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Stucker, H. (1999), Insurance on the net: here to stay, National Underwriter, Vol. 103 No. 51,p. 24.

    Trembly, A.C. (2001), Why the insurance industry has failed in the online distribution channel,National Underwriter, Vol. 105 No. 37, pp. 19-21.

    Useem, J. (1999), Internet defense strategy: cannibalize yourself, Fortune, Vol. 140 No. 5,pp. 121-9.

    Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2004), Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing, Journal ofMarketing, Vol. 68 No. 1, pp. 1-17.

    Veliyath, R. (1996), Business risk and performance: an examination of industry effects, Journal

    of Applied Business Research, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 37-47.

    Vroom, V.H. (1964), Work and Motivation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.

    Ward, M.R. and Morganosky, M. (2000), Does Online Retailing Cannibalize Other MarketingChannels?, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.

    Corresponding authorDheeraj Sharma can be contacted at: [email protected]

    Internet channeland perceived

    cannibalization

    1091

    To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: [email protected] visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints