introduction and evaluation of tomato germplasm by...
TRANSCRIPT
InnovativeAgricultureResearchInitiative(iAGRI)CollaborativeResearchWorkshop
April28‐29,2016
Introduction and evaluation of tomato germplasm by participatory mother-
baby trials in the Morogoro Region of Tanzania
Anna Testen, Delphina Mamiro, Hosea Mtui , Ernest Mbega, Babu Selemani, Jackson Nahson, David
Francis Sal ly Mi l ler
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐19, 2016
ContentsBackgroundProject objectiveLocationResearch Findings Baseline Survey Tomato Variety Evaluation
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐19, 2016
BackgroundFarmers in the Morogoro Region grow determinate,
processing type tomato varieties◦ These are predominately varieties that are susceptible to
diseases and environmental stresses◦ Farmers are growing less productive varieties than what is
currently availableParticipatory crop improvement efforts usually focus
on grain crops, such as maize and rice◦ Can we develop a framework for participatory crop
improvement for horticultural crops, focusing on tomato in the Morogoro Region?
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐19, 2016
Project ObjectiveDetermine the adaptability of currently available open-pollinated and hybrid tomato germplasm with known disease resistance characteristics to local conditions and pathogen populations in the Morogoro region◦ Conducted a baseline survey to gather information on current tomato
production practices in Morogoro (Five villages)◦ Conducted a series of participatory variety selection trials to evaluate
the performance of tomato varieties in the Morogoro Region (Three villages)
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐19, 2016
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐19, 2016
Baseline Survey◦ Conducted in all five villages◦ Twenty farmers per village◦ Questions on tomato production practices, pesticide
usage, diseases, and soil management
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐29, 2016
Baseline Survey (1)Characteristic
Village in the Morogoro Region, Tanzania
Msongozi Msufini Mabana Mlali Kibagala
Gender 7 F, 11 M, 2 5 F, 15 M 1 F, 19 M 11 F, 9 M 4 F, 17 M
Age18-33: 434-49: 1350-65+: 3
18-33: 634-49: 850-65+: 6
18-33: 934-49: 550-65+: 6
18-33: 634-49: 1150-65+: 3
18-33: 634-49: 950-65+: 6
Education Level
None: 0Primary: 20Secondary: 0Tertiary: 0
None: 1Primary: 14Secondary: 5Tertiary: 0
None: 0Primary: 18Secondary: 2Tertiary: 0
None: 2Primary: 11Secondary: 4Tertiary: 3
None: 0Primary: 16Secondary: 1Tertiary: 1
Field size (acres)
1.47 (1.22, 0.5-6)
0.86 (0.62, 0.25-2.5)
3.49 (5.12, 1-18)
1.24 (1.68, 0.25-8)
1.31 (0.83, 0.5-4)
Years of experience 10 (7, 3-29) 8 (7, 2-30) 6 (6, 1-20) 11 (9, 1-30) 10 (9, 2-45)
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐29, 2016
Baseline Survey (2)
Characteristic
Village in the Morogoro Region, Tanzania
Msongozi Msufini Mabana Mlali Kibagala
Varieties (number of farmers growing that variety)
Onyx (17), Tanya (5), Mwanga (2), Hybrid (1), CalJVF (11), other (3)
Onyx (14), Tanya (3), Roma (2), Mwanga (5), CalJ VF (6), Tenger 97 (1), other (5)
Onyx (7), Tanya (14), Roma (1), Rio Grande(2), CalJ VF (6), other (5)
Onyx (15), Roma (1), Rio Grande(9), Mwanga (3), Hybrid (3), CalJVF (3), other (3)
Onyx (3), Tanya (6), Roma (1), Rio Grand(14), Mwanga (7), Hybrid (5), CalJVF (3)
Yield per acre (number of tengas1 per acre)
222 (137, 60-500)
174 (172, 30-700)
184 (120, 30-400)
200 (103, 85-500) 109 (79, 6-350)
Crops rotated
Rice or maize (8), rice (3), maize (6), vegetables (1)
Rice or maize (4), rice (6), maize (4), vegetables (4), oil crops (1)
Rice or maize (3), rice (11), maize (2), legumes (1), vegetables (3), oil crops (2)
Rice or maize (2), maize (8), legumes (2), vegetables (8)
Maize (3), legumes (19), vegetables (11),
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐19, 2016
How do farmers select varieties?Baseline survey top three characteristics◦ Fruit size (60% of respondents, n = 79)◦ Transportability (56%)◦ Keeping quality (53%)
Mother-baby trial participants top three characteristics◦ Yield (77% of respondents, n = 31)◦ Disease resistance (68%)◦ Durability for storage and transport (61%)
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐19, 2016
Participatory Variety Selection Trials (PVS)With PVS:◦ Farmers immediately involved in the variety selection process◦ Decreases time for selection, increases variety acceptability
Mother-baby trials◦ Developed by Dr. Sieglinde Snapp to
evaluate soil fertility management in Malawi◦ 3 villages (Msufini, Mabana, Msongozi)◦ 3 test varieties◦ 2 OSU inbred lines and MT56
◦ 7 local varieties
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐29, 2016
The Mother-Baby Trial DesignMother Trials: Randomized, complete block design
•Farmer compares test varieties to preferred local variety•Farmer managed•Qualitative data on crop traits
•All local varieties compared to test varieties•Researcher dictated management•Quantitative data on crop traits
Baby Trials: Randomized design
Test Varieties
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐29, 2016
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Tengeru 97
Assila F1
Onyx
Tanya
Mwanga
Cal J
OH7870
Roma
MT56
OH8243
Yield (kg/plant)A
AB
AB
ABC
ABC
BC
BC
CD
DE
E
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐29, 2016
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
OH8243
MT56
Assila F1
OH7870
Roma
Tengeru 97
Mwanga
Tanya
Cal J
Onyx
Percent Incidence
Early Blight Incidence (Early season evaluation)
A
A
A
AB
ABC
ABCD
BCD
CD
CD
D
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐29, 2016
0 5 10 15 20 25
Assila F1
MT56
Tengeru 97
OH7870
OH8243
Tanya
Roma
Onyx
Mwanga
Cal J
Percent Severity
Early Blight Severity (Late season evaluation)
BC
BCD
CDE
DEF
EFG
FG
FG
G
A
AB
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐29, 2016
26.5 27 27.5 28 28.5 29 29.5
Tanya
Mwanga
MT56
OH7870
Onyx
Roma
Cal J
Assila F1
Tengeru 97
OH8243
Number of plants (30 max)
Stand Counts
A
A
A
A
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
B
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐29, 2016
60 65 70 75 80 85
Tanya
Tengeru 97
Roma
Mwanga
OH7870
Onyx
Cal J
MT56
Assila F1
OH8243
Percent Flowering or FruitingA
A
AB
ABC
ABC
ABC
ABC
BC
C
C
Percent flowering/fruiting
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐29, 2016
2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3
Tanya
MT56
OH8243
Onyx
OH7870
Mwanga
Roma
Cal J
Assila F1
Tengeru 97
VigorA
ABC
AB
ABC
ABCD
BCD
BCD
BCD
CD
D
Vigor rating (Scale 1-3)
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐29, 2016
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Assila F1
OH7870
Roma
Tanya
MT56
OH8243
Onyx
Mwanga
Cal J
Tengeru 97
Percent of leaf area with insect damage
Insect Damage (End of season evaluation)A
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
B
B
B
B
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐29, 2016
Can MBT be used in a tomato breeding program?
A random effects ANOVA model can be used to calculate variance components
Variance components can be used to determine if a genetic signal is detectable for further breeding and can be used to calculate heritability
Heritability estimates◦ Yield: 0.74◦ EB incidence: 0.71◦ EB severity: 0.90
YieldEarly blight incidence (early season)
Early blight severity (late season)
Variance Component Variance
Percent of Total Variance Variance
Percent of Total Variance Variance
Percent of Total Variance
Variety0.32 (0.57) 8.11%
114.04 (10.67) 6.08%
29.90(5.47) 26.16%
Farmer2.24 (1.50) 57.03%
928.75 (30.48) 49.48%
27.62 (5.26) 24.16%
Variety: Farmer
0.33 (0.58) 8.41%
11.76 (3.43) 0.63%
7.46 (2.73) 6.52%
Rep in Farmer0.39 (0.63) 10.0%
370.90 (19.26) 19.76%
25.98 (5.10) 22.73%
Error0.65 (0.81) 16.46%
451.48 (21.24) 24.05%
23.34 (4.83) 20.42%
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐29, 2016
Baby Trial Rankings1. Vigor2. Management3. Yield4. First to Harvest5. Harvest Period6. Diseases7. Insects8. Fruit Quality: Eating9. Fruit Quality: Food Preparation10.Fruit Quality: Marketing11.Fruit Size12.Fruit Color13.Storage Quality14.Salability15.Profitability16.Overall Preference
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐29, 2016
Vigor
OH8243 Local OH7870 MT56
Ease of Management
OH8243 Local OH7870 MT56
Yield
OH8243 OH7870 Local MT56
Best Ranking Worst Ranking
Same color indicates no difference in rankings
First to Harvest
OH8243 OH7870 MT56 Local
Baby Trial Rankings(1)
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐29, 2016
Harvest Period
Local OH7870 OH8243 MT56
Diseases
OH8243 OH7870 MT56 Local
Best Ranking Worst Ranking
Same color indicates no difference in rankings
Insects
MT56 Local OH8243 OH7870
Fruit quality for eating
OH8243 Local MT56 OH7870
Baby Trial Rankings (2)
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐29, 2016
Fruit quality for food preparation
MT56 OH8243 Local OH7870
Best Ranking Worst Ranking
Same color indicates no difference in rankings
Fruit quality for marketing
Local OH7870 OH8243 MT56
Fruit size
Local OH7870 OH8243 MT56
Fruit color
OH8243 OH7870 Local MT56
Baby Trial Rankings(3)
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐29, 2016
Storage quality
Local OH8243 OH7870 MT56
Salability
Local OH7870 OH8243 MT56
Profitability
Local OH7870 OH8243 MT56
Overall Preference
Local OH7870 OH8243 MT56
Best Ranking Worst Ranking
Same color indicates no difference in rankings
Baby Trial Rankings (4)
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐19, 2016
Variety AdoptionMsufini Msongozi Mabana
Farmers interviewed 9 10 9
Farmers that saved and grew any introduced varieties 8 8 3
Farmers that grew OH8243 6 7 2
Farmers that grew OH7870 7 5 2
Farmers that grew MT56 3 1 2
Farmers that distributed seeds 8 3 0
Farmers that received seed from MBT participants 47 5 0
Distributions of OH8243 (Number of farmers that received this variety)
21 5 0
Distributions of OH7870 26 3 0
Distributions of MT56 4 0 0
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐19, 2016
ConclusionsFrom the baseline survey, we have a better understanding Morogoro farmers’ tomato production practicesThe mother‐baby trials were an effective tool to introduce and evaluate tomato varieties◦ Good farmer participation◦ Farmers continued to grow introduced varieties following the conclusion of the trials
Collaborative Research Final WorkshopApril 28‐19, 2016
RecommendationsExpand mother‐baby trials◦ To more tomato varieties◦ To other horticultural crops, such as onion, melon, etc.Mother‐baby trials are time and resource intensive so training and extensive planning is required before conducting these trials◦ Workshop on conducting mother‐baby trials
28
Plant Pathology
Funding
Dr. Sally Miller Dr. Brian McSpadden Gardener Dr. David Francis Dr. Steve Culman
Dr. Delphina MamiroDr. Hosea MtuiJackson Nahson
Dr. Danny CoyneDr. Fen Beed
Dr. Ernest Mbega
Collaborators
U.S. Borlaug Fellows in Global Food Security Graduate Student Research Grant