introduction objective and scopes project flow literature review previous work contact analysis

39

Upload: torgny

Post on 11-Feb-2016

32 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

CONTENTS. Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis Result Structural modification Conclusion. 1. INTRODUCTION. Contact analysis is normally performed on brake assembly to study the pressure distribution and the contact area. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis
Page 2: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

1. Introduction2. Objective and scopes3. Project flow4. Literature review5. Previous work6. Contact analysis7. Result8. Structural modification9. Conclusion

CONTENTSCONTENTS

Page 3: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

1. INTRODUCTION1. INTRODUCTION

• Contact analysis is normally performed on brake assembly to study the pressure distribution and the contact area.

• Significant of contact analysis are to investigate the effect of contact problem to the wear, thermal and squeal.

• Only Finite Element Method are able to use to perform contact analysis both static and dynamic conditions.

content

Page 4: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

“TO DETERMINE CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTIONAND CONTACT AREA OF A DRUM BRAKE ASSEMBLY

USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD”

2. OBJECTIVE2. OBJECTIVE

SCOPESSCOPES

Develop a Finite Element model of drum brake. Validate the Finite Element model against experimental

result using modal analysis. Perform contact analysis using a commercial

Finite Element (FE) software package. Propose structural modification method in order to

determine uniform contact pressure distribution andhigher contact area.

content

Page 5: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

3. PROJECT FLOW

Generate FE model

Run modal analysis

Compare Modal Analysis Result

BetweenExperimental and

FE Method

No

Yes

Error notexceed than

5%

START

FINISH

SMJ 5912

PerformContact Analysis using

validated model

Purposestructural modification

START

FINISH

SMJ 5924

content

Page 6: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

The FE model validated by using modal analysis

Contact pressure at leading shoe are more higher than trailing shoe.

Parameters that can influence contact analysis are:

Coefficient of friction

Material properties

Actuation pressure

Rotation speed

Installation gap

4. LITERATURE REVIEW4. LITERATURE REVIEW

Figure : Contact pressure distribution for leading and trailing shoes H-i Kang (2002) content

Page 7: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

  DRUM BRAKE SHOE BODY LINING

Density (kg/m3) 7673 8762 2638

Young's modulus (GPa) 104 250 3.1

Poisson's ratio 0.3 0.3 0.3

Three components of drum brake assembly are generated (Drum, leading shoe and trailing shoe)

FE model are validated using the experimental data (Modal analysis)

Material properties for the model are listed below

5. PREVIOUS WORK(PSM 1)

Page 8: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

Components Types of element No. of elements

No. nodes

DrumLinear hexahedral

elements(C3D8)

7546 13578

Leading shoe

Linear hexahedral elements

(C3D8)Linear wedge

element type (C3D6)

1023 2776

Trailing shoe

Linear hexahedral elements

(C3D8)Linear wedge

element type (C3D6)

1130 2042

content

FE modelFE model

Page 9: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

Surface-to-surface contact interaction

The drum surface are set as master surface

The lining surface are set as slave surface

6. CONTACT ANALYSIS

Figure : Result obtain from FE software

Page 10: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

6 Parameters were used to study the influence to contact analysis

1. Test condition

2. Coefficient of friction

3. Actuation pressure

4. Material properties (lining)

5. Material properties (brake shoe body)

6. Installation gap

content

CONTACT ANALYSISCONTACT ANALYSIS

Page 11: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100C

onta

ct a

rea

(%)

Static DynamicTest condition

Contact area for different drum condition

Leading

Trailing

CONTACT AREA WITH DIFFERENTCONTACT AREA WITH DIFFERENTTEST CONDITIONTEST CONDITION

Contact area 5.5% larger for dynamic test condition for leading shoe

Contact area are 27.1% smaller for trailing shoe.

Page 12: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

0 1122

3243

5465

7586

97

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

Con

tact

Pre

ssur

e (P

a)

Angular position (o)

Contact Pressure distribution at static condition(Leading)

Actuation side

Abutment side

Lining width

0 1122

3243

5465

7586

97

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

Con

tact

Pre

ssur

e (P

a)

Angular Position (o)

Abutment side

Lining width

Actuation side

Static

Dynamic

CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION FORCONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION FORLEADING SHOELEADING SHOE

Page 13: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

010 20

3141

51

61

72

82

92

102

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

Con

tact

Pre

ssur

e (P

a)

Angular position (o)

Abutment side

Lining width

Actuation side

010 20 31

41

51

61

72

82

92

102

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

Con

tact

Pre

ssur

e (P

a)

Angular Position (o)

Abutment side

Actuation side

Lining width

Static

Dynamic

CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION FORCONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION FORTRAILING SHOETRAILING SHOE

Page 14: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100C

onta

ct a

rea

(%)

0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40Coefficient of Friction

Leading

Trailing

CONTACT AREA WITH DIFFERENTCONTACT AREA WITH DIFFERENTCOEFFICIENT OF FRICTIONCOEFFICIENT OF FRICTION

The higher value coefficient of friction, the lower contact area.

Page 15: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

0 20 40 60 80 100

Angular position (O)

Con

tact

Pre

ssur

e (P

a)

0.20

0.250.30

0.350.40

Actuation side Abutment side

μ

CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT COEFFICIENT OF FRICTIONCOEFFICIENT OF FRICTION

(LEADING)(LEADING)

Page 16: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

0 20 40 60 80 100

Angular position (O)

Con

tact

Pre

ssur

e (P

a)

0.20

0.250.30

0.350.40

Actuation side

Abutment side

μ

CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT COEFFICIENT OF FRICTIONCOEFFICIENT OF FRICTION

(TRAILING)(TRAILING)

Page 17: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Con

tact

are

a (%

)

2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0Actuation Pressure (Mpa)

Leading

Trailing

Contact area unchained for both shoes when different

actuation pressure are applied.

85.7% for leading and 64.2% for trailing

CONTACT AREA WITH DIFFERENTCONTACT AREA WITH DIFFERENTACTUATION PRESSUREACTUATION PRESSURE

Page 18: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

7.0E+05

8.0E+05

9.0E+05

0 20 40 60 80 100

Angular position (o)

Pres

sure

Dis

trib

utio

n (P

a)

2 MPa2.5MPa3 MPa3.5 MPa4 MPa

Actuation side Abutment side

CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT ACTUATION PRESSUREACTUATION PRESSURE

(LEADING)(LEADING)

Page 19: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

7.0E+05

8.0E+05

9.0E+05

0 20 40 60 80 100

Angular position (o)

Pres

sure

Dis

trib

utio

n (P

a) 2 MPa2.5MPa3 MPa3.5 MPa4 MPa

Actuation side Abutment side

CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT ACTUATION PRESSUREACTUATION PRESSURE

(TRAILING)(TRAILING)

Page 20: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Con

tact

are

a (%

)

-15%

-10% -5%

base

line

5% 10%

15%

Variation (%)

Leading

Trailing

The actual Elastic properties for lining is 3.10GPa

CONTACT AREA WITH DIFFERENTCONTACT AREA WITH DIFFERENTMATERIAL PROPERTIESMATERIAL PROPERTIES

(LINING)(LINING)

Page 21: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 57 65 73 81 89 97 105

Angular position (o)

Con

tact

Pre

essu

re (P

a)

-15%-10%-5%baseline5%10%15%

Actuation side Abutment side

CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT MATERIAL PROPERTIESMATERIAL PROPERTIES

(LEADING)(LEADING)

Page 22: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 57 65 73 81 89 97 105

Angular position (o)

Con

tact

Pre

essu

re (P

a)

-15%-10%-5%baseline5%10%15%

Actuation side Abutment side

CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT MATERIAL PROPERTIESMATERIAL PROPERTIES

(TRAILING)(TRAILING)

Page 23: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Con

tact

are

a (%

)

-15%

-10% -5

%

base

line

5% 10%

15%

Variation (%)

Leading

Trailing

CONTACT AREA WITH DIFFERENTCONTACT AREA WITH DIFFERENTMATERIAL PROPERTIESMATERIAL PROPERTIES(BRAKE SHOE BODY)(BRAKE SHOE BODY)

The actual Elastic properties for brake shoe body is 250GPa

Page 24: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

0 10 20 31 41 51 61 72 82 92

Angular position (o)

Con

tact

Pre

essu

re (P

a)

-15%-10%-5%baseline5%10%15%

Actuation side Abutment side

CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT MATERIAL PROPERTIESMATERIAL PROPERTIES

(LEADING)(LEADING)

Page 25: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

Contact Pressure distribution with different modulus of elasticity(Leading shoe body)

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

0 10 20 31 41 51 61 72 82 92 102

Angular position (o)

Con

tact

Pre

essu

re (P

a)

-15%-10%-5%baseline5%10%15%

Actuation side Abutment side

CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT MATERIAL PROPERTIESMATERIAL PROPERTIES

(TRAILING)(TRAILING)

Page 26: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Con

tact

are

a (%

)

0 m

m

0.5

mm

1.0

mm

1.5

mm

2.0.

mm

Installation gap

Leading

Trailing

CONTACT AREA WITH DIFFERENTCONTACT AREA WITH DIFFERENTINSTALLATION GAPINSTALLATION GAP

Highest area for leading shoe at 2mm gap (85.8%)

Highest area for trailing at 0.5mm gap (65.0%)

Page 27: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

0 20 40 60 80 100Angular position (o)

Con

tact

Pre

ssur

e (P

a)

0.5 mm

1.0 mm

1.5 mm

2.0 mm

0 mm

Actuation side Abutment side

CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT INSTALLATION GAPINSTALLATION GAP

(LEADING)(LEADING)

Page 28: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

0 20 40 60 80 100

Angular position (o)

Con

tact

Pre

ssur

e (P

a)

0.5 mm

1.0 mm

1.5 mm

2.0 mm

0 mm

Actuation side Abutment side

CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT CONTACT PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION WITH DIFFERENT INSTALLATION GAPINSTALLATION GAP

(TRAILING)(TRAILING)

content

Page 29: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

PARAMETER CONTACTAREA

CONTACTPRESSURE DISTRIBUTION

COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION VARY VARY

ACTUATION PRESSURE NO VARY

E LINING VARY VARY

E BRAKE SHOE BODY VARY VARY

INSTALLATION GAP VARY VARY

content

Overall ResultsOverall Results

Page 30: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

STRUCTURAL MODIFICATION

MODEL 1 : Adjust location for leading lining

MODEL 2 : Adjust location for trailing lining

MODEL 3 : Add more length for both shoe

MODEL 4 : Add thickness at shoe rib

MODEL 5 : Add thickness at shoe platform

Structural modification done to

“Obtain more uniform pressure distribution by seeking greater contact area and lower pressure”

Greater contact area and uniform pressure distribution can reduce the uneven wear and squeal.

Structural modification done by changing the current geometry

Page 31: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

Model 2 Model 1

Model 3 Model 4 Model 5

Current Model

STRUCTURAL MODIFICATION(CTD)

Page 32: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Con

tact

are

a (%

)

Cur

rent

Mod

el 1

Mod

el 2

Mod

el 3

Mod

el 4

Mod

el 5

MODEL

SHOE 1 2 3 4 5

LEADING 3.8% 0 -1.1% -5.4% 7.2%

TRAILING -7.3% -37% -0.2% -8.3% 1.7%

CONTACT AREACONTACT AREA

Figure :Contact area for different models

Comparison base on current model

Page 33: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

010 21

3141

51

62

72

82

93

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

Con

tact

Pre

ssur

e (P

a)

Angular Position (o)

Actuation side

Abutment side

Lining width

010 21

3141

51

62

72

82

93

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

Con

tact

Pre

ssur

e (P

a)Angular Position (o) Lining width

Abutment side

Actuation side

Trailing

Leading

MODEL 1MODEL 1

Page 34: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

0 1021

3141

5262

7283

93

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

Con

tact

Pre

ssur

e (P

a)

Angular Position (o)

Lining width

Abutment side

Actuation side

010

2131

41

52

62

72

83

93

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

Con

tact

Pre

ssur

e (P

a)Angular Position (o)

Lining width

Abutment side

Actuation side

Trailing

Leading

MODEL 2MODEL 2

Page 35: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

010

21

31

42

52

63

73

84

94

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

Con

tact

Pre

ssur

e (P

a)

Angular Position (o)

Leading shoe 5-1

Actuation side

Abutment side

Lining width

010 21

3142

52

63

73

84

94

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

Con

tact

Pre

ssur

e (P

a)Angular Position (o)

Actuation side

Abutment side

Lining width

Trailing

Leading

MODEL 3MODEL 3

Page 36: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

010 20

3141

51

61

71

82

92

102

0.0E+001.0E+052.0E+053.0E+054.0E+055.0E+056.0E+057.0E+058.0E+059.0E+051.0E+06

Con

tact

Pre

ssur

e (P

a)

Angular Position (o)

Actuation side

Abutment side

Lining width

010 20

3141

51

61

71

82

92

102

0.0E+001.0E+052.0E+053.0E+054.0E+055.0E+056.0E+057.0E+058.0E+059.0E+051.0E+06

Con

tact

Pre

ssur

e (P

a)

Angular Position (o)

Actuation side

Abutment side

Lining width

Trailing

Leading

MODEL 4MODEL 4

Page 37: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

0 816 24 31 39 47 55

6371

79

86

94

102

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

Con

tact

Pre

ssur

e (P

a)

Angular Position (o)

Actuation side

Abutment side

Lining width

0 816 24 31 39 47 55

6371

79

86

94

102

0.0E+00

1.0E+05

2.0E+05

3.0E+05

4.0E+05

5.0E+05

6.0E+05

Con

tact

Pre

ssur

e (P

a)

Angular Position (o)

Actuation side

Abutment side

Lining width

Trailing

Leading content

MODEL 5MODEL 5

Page 38: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

1. Only FE method are able to perform contact analysis both static and dynamic conditions.

2. Maximum contact pressure occurs at the actuation side for leading shoe and at the abutment side for trailing shoe.

3. Parameters that can influence the contact properties are coefficient of friction, material properties, actuation pressure and installation gap.

4. Structural modification can improve the contact area and pressure distribution.

CONCLUSIONCONCLUSION

Page 39: Introduction Objective and scopes Project flow Literature review Previous work Contact analysis

THANK YOU