introduction silicon tracker project: design production tracking strategy and performance design and...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
224 views
TRANSCRIPT
IntroductionSilicon Tracker project:
design production
Tracking strategy and performance
Design and performance of the LHCb Silicon Tracker
Kim VervinkEcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
TIME 05 - Zurich
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 2
A huge one arm spectrometer.
p p
250 mrad
10 mrad
Dipole MagnetVertex Locator
Muon ChambersCalorimeters
Tracking Systems
Rich 1 & 2
Precision measurements of CP violation and rare decays in the B sector
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 3
Neighbouring detectors of the Silicon Tracker.
21 stations around the interaction point
The other subdetector that uses silicon
1m
Half discs open during beam injectionand close around the interaction point up until 8 mmWhole subdetector in vacuumSilicon thickness: 300 m
R – detector strip orientation
The vertex locator
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 4
the outer tracker
Outer Tracker 3 stations with 4 double planes
OT Straw tubes5mm diameterPitch 5,25 mm
4,7 m!
Module production going to completion
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 5
Silicon Tracker Project Some participants
Involved institutes: M.I.P. – Heidelberg E.P.F.L. – LausanneU.S.C. – Santiago de CompostelaUniZh – Zurich
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 6
Challenges of the Silicon Tracker.1. Large areas have to be covered in Silicon. The Silicon design is adapted in
order:• to keep it affordable • not to become overloaded in readout channels Long readout strips
Large distance between readout strips
2. Bunch crossings every 25ns fast shaping time
3. Momentum resolution is limited by multiple scattering minimization of material for the acceptance: Thin sensors
Increases noise Optimised front-end electronics
Thinner sensors make S/N go down Best compromise
Decreases S/N between strips optimise width/pitch of the strips
More load capacitance which increases the noise Beetle chip front-end designAdapted sensor thickness
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 7
Where is the Trigger Tracker?
VELO TT
Located behind the Velo & Rich 1
Just in front of the Magnet: still in frindge field
Active area of the detector covers full acceptance (cooling and electronics outside)
2 half stations in one box with in total 4 detector planes (0°, 5°, -5°, 0° orientation)
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 8
Trigger Tracker
Silicon sensors
Support rails
Interconnectcable
Pitch adaptor
Staggered front-end readout hybrids
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 9
Inner Tracker consists out of 3 stations, surrounded by the Outer Tracker
Where is the Inner Tracker?
VELO TT
Complete IT detector inside the acceptance (hybrids,pcb’s, cooling, cabling, …)
2 boxes with 2 Si-sensors modules 2 boxes with 1 Si-sensor modules
1,3 % of acceptance, 20% of tracks.
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 10
Cooling System
Readout Cables, High and Low voltage cables
Si-sensor
Kapton insulation
Carbon Fiber support layer:helps the cooling flow to the sensors
Airex foam
Aluminium Mini-Balcony
Pitch Adaptor + hybrid with Beetles.
Ladders are attached via the mini-balcony on a cooling rod, through which runs a cooling liquid detector is cooled (10°C) in order to control the thermal runaway
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 11
Silicon sensors for a fast and precise measurement.
TT IT
Type p+ microstrips on n type bulk
p+ microstrips on n type bulk
Dimensions (active area)
94,4mm x 94,6 mm
(93,9 mm x 91, 6 mm)
110 mm x 78 mm (108mm x 76mm)
Readout channels
512 384
Implant width 0,25 (w/p) 0,25 (w/p)
Pitch 198 m 183 m
Thickness 500 m 320 m or 410 m
HV input to the backside of the sensor
Bond pads &DC readout!
S/N value is above 12, taking into account the charge loss between strips.
Left strip Right strip
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 12
Production StatusTrigger Tracker: 2 half stations with 280 (+15% spare) readout sectors have to be buildInner Tracker: 3 stations with 336 (+15% spare) modules are to be produced and tested
A typical production trategy: Building of a module using jigs (parallel production)
MetrologyElectrical test using internal test pulses in order to find broken or unbonded strips
Schedual: Prototyping finished in August for both detectors Start of production All modules need to be fabricated by April 2006
Installation in the LHCb pit in June 2006 Status: Inner Tracker has about 20 modules produced Trigger Tracker has 13 modules fabricated
Inner trackertesting box
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 13
A Trigger Tracker module and burn-in test setup
TT burn-in test
4 modules
Cooling system
Burn-in box
A built TT module
Kapton readout cable
Hybrid
Sensor
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 14
Support and IT modules are in theproduction phase…
The 2nd short ladder module that was made…
Setup of the support frame
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 15
Silicon project: essential part for the tracking of the LHCb detector
Reconstruction is not a trivial task
LHCb gets about 50 primary particles per event: check….
30% radiation length between interaction point and Rich2Secondary particlesMultiple scatteringDegrades the momentum resolution
Interaction every 25 nsSpillover from previous bunch crossings
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 16
Tracking reconstruction
Particles spread out by magnet.
Bdl = 4 Tesla mWarm magnet
Top view
Multipass strategy• Long tracks• Ks after Velo• Only Velo and TT
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 17
First look for tracks that pass the whole tracking device (from Velo to T) Easiest to find Highest track resolution
The most important ones for physics studies
Start with a Velo Seed ( almost straight line: only position and direction known)
Adding one T station measurement to a Velo track Use optical parameterisation to calculate where the track passed using
zCenter and dSlope Use the other measurements of the T stations to confirm hypothesis
Fast algoritm: main tracking done in HLT Optical method parametrisation
Tracking strategy
zCenterdSlope
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 18
Second pass of long track reconstruction: work backwards
Seeding:Seeding in T stations using unused hitsThree hits define an ”almost” straight line Collect more hits around “trial track” to confirm your hypothesisAlso used to optimise Rich2 performance
Tracking:Transport the track seed to the Velo and compare with a Velo seed Look at the difference of track parameters Use ² criteria for matches
This method adds about 3% to the overall long track finding efficiency
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 19
Of the remaining hits, make tracks from particles that passed only in TT and IT/OT • Most are decay products of a Ks that decay outside VeLo• Look for unused seeds in the T stations and add hits in TT• Use optical method again.
Look amongst the remaining particles for hits in the Velo and TT stations alone. • Particles with low momentum: bent out by magnetic field• Look for unused Velo tracks with hits in the TT detector• Moderate efficiency (70%) and resolution (p/p ~ 15%) but used to
improve RICH 1 performance, kaon tagging and to find slow from D*
Other track types
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 20
Tracking Performance on long tracks
Momentum dependent: B particles have higher momentum Track finding efficiency ~95%
Cut out in physicsanalysis
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 21
Performance on the resolution of the momentum and the impact parameter (long tracks)
Oct 4, 2005 Kim Vervink 22
Summary
The design and prototyping of the Silicon Tracker subdetectors is finished.
Production of both the Silicon Tracker has started andInstallation in the LHCb pit is schedualed in June 2006.
Tracking performances are highly dependent on the quality of the Silicon Tracker detector.
A tracking strategy has been implemented, and its performance is satisfactory.