introduction to partnership

Upload: umer-ehsan

Post on 07-Apr-2018

313 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/4/2019 Introduction to Partnership

    1/4

    Mercantile Law (Partnership Act)

    6. Introduction to Partnership

    DEFINITIONS AND NATURE

    DEFINITIONS [2, 4]is the relation between person who have agreed to share the profits of a

    partnership

    partners

    firm

    firm name

    act of a firm

    business

    third party

    prescribed

    business carried on all or any of them acting for all.

    Persons who have entered into partnership are individually called

    partners.

    Persons who have entered into partnership are collectively called firm. A

    firm is not a separate legal entity distinct from its members. The suit

    against the firm is suit against all the partners thereof.

    the name under which the business of partnership is carried on.

    means any act or omission by all the partners, or by any partner or agent of

    the firm which gives rise to a right enforceable by or against the firm. includesevery trade, occupation and profession.

    used in relation to firm or to a partner therein means any person who is not a

    partner in the firm.

    means prescribed under rules made under the Partnership Act, 1932.

    All other expressions shall have the same meanings as defined under Contract Act, 1872.

    TEST OF PARTNERSHIPA partnership may be formed by oral or by written agreement or an agreement of

    partnership can be inferred from the conduct of the parties.

    In the definition of partnership, notice that sharing of loss is not necessary for constituting

    a partnership. It may also be noted that an agreement to carry on business at a future time

    does not result in partnership unless that time arrives and the business is commenced.

    Illustration

    Facts: Ahmad and Baqir, two chartered accountants, agree to carry on practice in common

    at the office of Ahmad under the name Ahmad and Baqir for a period of seven years. The

    terms of agreement entered into between them provide that Baqir should manage the office

    and supervise the clerical work and that he should draw a fixed allowance of Rs.20,000 per

    month in lieu of profits. It is further agreed that losses, if any, shall be borne by Ahmad

    alone, and that after seven years Ahmad would be entitled to the office and all the otherequipments, and Baqir would not have any right, or claim, in respect of them. Are Ahmad

    and Baqir partners?

    Solution: Yes, Ahmad and Baqir are partners. In a partnership, partners are free to agree to

    any term as regards sharing of profits. Again, sharing of loss is not necessary for becoming a

    partner. So also, partners may agree that on the dissolution of their partnership all the

    assets will belong to one partner only.

  • 8/4/2019 Introduction to Partnership

    2/4

    CA Module B

    This definition contains five elements which constitute a partnership, namely:

    1. There must be a contract;

    2. between two or more persons;

    3. who agree to carry on a business;

    4. with the object of sharing profits; and

    5. the business must be carried on by all or any of them acting for all (i.e. there must bemutual agency).

    MODE OF DETERMINING EXISTENCE OF PARTNERSHIP [6]As must be clear from the above discussion of various elements of partnership, there is no

    single test of partnership . For example, in one case there may be sharing of profits but

    may not be any business, in the other case there may be business but there may not be

    sharing of profits, in yet another case there may be both business and sharing of profits but the

    relationship between persons sharing the profits may not be that of principal and agent. And in

    either case, therefore, there is no partnership. Thus, all the afore-mentioned essential elements

    must co-exist to constitute a partnership.

    In determining whether a group of persons is or is not a firm, or whether a person is or is not a

    partner in a firm, regard shall be had to the real relation between the parties, as shown

    by all relevant facts together.

    Illustration

    Facts: Majid is the sole proprietor of a firm. He admits Sajid as a partner on the following

    terms: (1) Sajid is not to bring any capital. (2) Sajid is not responsible for any loss. (3) Sajid is

    to receive Rs 10,000 per annum in lieu of profits. (4) Sajid is not to enter any contracts on

    behalf of the firm. Discuss the legal position of Sajid.

    Solution: Sajid is a partner with Majid because to constitute a partnership neither

    contribution of capital nor active participation in management of the business is essential.

    The sharing of profits or of gross returns arising from property by persons holding a joint or

    common interest in that property does not of itself make such persons partners.

    Illustration

    Facts: Jazib and Ghalib jointly purchased a tea shop and incurred additional expenses for

    purchasing pottery and some other materials to furnish the shop. The money was

    contributed half and half and then the rented out the shop. The rent has to be shared equally by

    them. Are Jazib and Ghalib partners?

    Solution: They are only co-owners and not partners as they never carried on any business. The

    receipt by a person of a share of the profit of a business, or of a paymentcontingent upon the earning of profits or varying with the profits earned by a business, does

    not of itself make him a partner with the persons carrying on the business.

    Illustration

    Facts: Raheem, a clerk in Kareems business, entered into a verbal agreement with Kareem

    for a share of profit and loss in the proportion of one-sixth to Raheem and five-sixth to

    Kareem. It was further agreed that the building in which the business was carried on should

  • 8/4/2019 Introduction to Partnership

    3/4

    Mercantile Law (Partnership Act)

    remain the property of Kareem. Raheem alleges that he is a partner and claims dissolution of

    the firm and an account of assets. Kareem denies the partnership, and alleges that

    Raheem is only a clerk. Decide.

    Solution: In view of the surrounding circumstances of the case it is evident that Raheem is

    only a clerk. It is an established fact that sharing of profits is not the sole test of partnership.

    In particular, the receipt of such share or payment by the following persons does not of

    itself make them a partner with the persons carrying on the business:

    (a) a lender of money to persons engaged or about to engage in any business;(b) a servant or agent as remuneration;(c) the widow or child of a deceased partner, as annuity;(d) a previous owner or part owner of the business, as consideration for the sale of the

    goodwill or share thereof.

    TYPES OF PARTNERSHIP [7, 8]

    Partnership at will

    Where no provision is made by contract

    between the partners for the duration of

    their partnership, or for the

    determination of their partnership.

    Particular partnership

    When a partnership is formed for a particularperiod or for a specific venture, e.g. for

    working a coal mine, or producing a film, it is

    called a particular partnership.

    DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PARTNERSHIP AND CO-OWNERSHIP

    Difference

    1. Contract

    Partnership

    Formation of contract is

    essential for this.

    Co-ownership

    It is not necessarily the result of

    agreement.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    6.

    7.

    8.

    9.

    Profitsharing

    Transfer of

    interest

    Agent

    Lien

    Purpose

    Limit on

    number

    business

    Partition

    It involves sharing of profit.

    A partner cannot transfer his

    interest in partnership without

    the consent of other partners. A

    partner is real or apparent

    agent of other partners.

    A partner has lien on common

    goods.

    The purpose of partnership

    business is sharing of gain.

    There is a maximum limit on

    number of partners.

    It must involve carrying on of a

    business.

    A partner has no right to

    demand partition of business in

    specie and he can only sue his

    co-partners for the dissolution

    of the firm and accounts.

    Itdoes not necessarily involve

    sharing of profit or loss.

    A co-owner can transfer his interest

    in property, without the consent of

    others.

    A co-owner is not agent of other co-

    owners.

    A co-owner has no lien on the things

    owned in common.

    Co-ownership does not necessarily

    exist for the sake of gain.

    There is no maximum limit.

    It does not necessarily involve the

    carrying on of a business.

    A co-owner is entitled to demand

    partition of joint property in specie

  • 8/4/2019 Introduction to Partnership

    4/4

    CA Module B

    PARTNERS

    NUMBER OF PARTNERSIn partnership the maximum limit of partners is 10 for banking business and 20 for any

    other business. The minimum limit is 02.

    KINDS OF PARTNERS

    Active / ostensible or

    actual partners

    Sleeping or dormant

    partners

    Silent partners

    Partner in profits

    only

    Sub-partner

    Partner by estoppel

    or holding out

    Partners taking an active part in business, they are full fledged

    partners and liable for all acts of firm. They must give public

    notice of their retirement to free themselves from liability.

    They do not take an active part in business, and are liable to

    third parties for all acts of the firm. However, they are not

    required to give public notice of their retirement.

    Not involved in management but are fully liable to third parties for

    all acts of the firm.

    They do share profits but not losses however their liability to

    third parties is unlimited as well.

    When a partner agrees to share his share of profits in a

    partnership firm with an outsider, such an outsider is called a

    sub-partner. Such a sub-partner is has no rights against the firm nor

    he is liable for the debts of the firm.

    They are also called quasi partners or nominal partners. They are

    liable to third party who gave credit to the firm on the faith of

    representation made by such partners.

    SCOPE

    APPLICATION OF CONTRACT ACT [3]The provisions of Contract Act, 1872 shall continue to apply to firms so far as they are not

    inconsistent with the provisions of Partnership Act, 1932.

    PARTNERSHIP NOT CREATED BY STATUS [5]The relation of partnership arises from contract and not from status. In particular, the

    members of Hindu undivided family carrying on a family business as such, or a Burmese

    Buddhist husband and wife carrying on business as such are not partners in such business.

    NON APPLICATION OF CERTAIN RELATIONSHIP [6A]The Partnership Act, 1932 shall not apply to a relationship created by any agreement

    between a banking company and a person or group of persons providing for

    sharing of profit and losses arising from or relating to the provisions by a banking

    company of finance to such person or group of persons.

    The above implies that having a PLS bank account or investment in banking mutual funds

    does not constitute partnership.