investigating noroviruses: a case studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/norovirusesand... ·...

21
Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, MPH North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services

Upload: vancong

Post on 06-Mar-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study

David Bergmire-Sweat MPH North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services

Norovirus Facts

Small round-structured viruses from Caliciviridae family

First recognized as pathogenic cause of gastroenteritis in 1968 Norwalk Ohio

Transmitted via fecal-oral route Highly contagiousmdashas few as 10 viral

particles can cause infection

Symptoms

Incubation period ~ 24-48 hours can be less Vomiting Watery non-bloody diarrhea Abdominal cramps Nausea Low-grade fever Symptoms typically resolve ~ 24-60 hours (1-3

days)

Documented Modes of Transmission Foodhandler contamination of items in

restaurant Daycare centers Secondary person-to-person Aerosolized (vomiting and diarrhea) Cleaning up after ill person in a bathroom

Immunity amp Epidemiology

Seems to be strain-specific and temporary (few months)

CDC estimates 23 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually in US due to noroviruses

CDC estimates noroviruses cause ~50 of all foodborne disease outbreaks

Detection

Best method is via reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Viral RNA Adults can shed viral particles for up to 2

weeks after symptoms resolve Infants and toddlers may shed longer

Case Study

Small state university north of Houston TX

Student body ~ 10000 students

2054 students owned meal plans

125 students present to student health center and local hospital with gastrointenteritis in 24 hr period

Symptoms

125 ill students on March 10-11 1998 23 admitted to hospital 91 reported vomiting 85 reported diarrhea (3+ loose stools in

24 hours) 68 reported abdominal cramps

Epidemic Curve

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Date 5-Mar

6-Mar

7-Mar

8-Mar

9-Mar

10-Mar

11-Mar

12-Mar

13-Mar

14-Mar

15-Mar

Cases by Onset Date

Laboratory Investigation

62 stool samples sent to Texas Department of Health Lab in Austin

All negative for Salmonella Shigella Campylobacter Yersinia E coli O157H7 Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus

18 samples tested for Norovirus by RT-PCR 9 were positive

Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks Verifying Exposures Identifying potential

healthy controls Finding people to

interview them Hundreds of food

items Rule inout other

exposures

Rapid Action

Outbreak occurred toward end of week right before Spring Break

Sanitarians from local health department investigated realized cafeteria was about to close for week and perform massive cleaningmaintenance

Locked down all present food items instructed staff not to throw anything out

Epidemiologic Investigation

Unmatched Case-control study by Texas Dept of Health

36 ill subjects 136 well controls

Matched Case-control study by CDC

29 ill subjects 29 well controls

Findings ndash Matched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

110 16-473 lt 001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

60 07-276 006

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

80 11-355 002

Deli sandwich 310 supper

10 001-79 75

Findings ndash Unmatched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

111 39-32 lt 0001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

71 16-33 lt001

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

57 2-16 lt0001

Deli sandwich 310 supper

33 06-20 11

Any deli sandwich on 39 or 310

168 62-47 lt0001

Interpretation

Both studies implicated deli sandwiches on 39 and 310

The more controls in a study the better statistical power you have

No other restaurants or food items showed any association

Cafeteria Staff Investigation

Sanitarians and epidemiologists interviewed foodhandlers

All denied illness All except one submitted stool samples for

testing One refused cafeteria manager fired her She was responsible for slicing deli meats

and making deli sandwiches

Discussion

CDC and TDH epidemiologists were disappointed with cafeteria manager decision to fire the one employee

Much more difficult to get cooperation Eventually did interview her She denied illness but had infant with

diarrhea Stool sample from infant was PCR

positive for Norovirus

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 2: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Norovirus Facts

Small round-structured viruses from Caliciviridae family

First recognized as pathogenic cause of gastroenteritis in 1968 Norwalk Ohio

Transmitted via fecal-oral route Highly contagiousmdashas few as 10 viral

particles can cause infection

Symptoms

Incubation period ~ 24-48 hours can be less Vomiting Watery non-bloody diarrhea Abdominal cramps Nausea Low-grade fever Symptoms typically resolve ~ 24-60 hours (1-3

days)

Documented Modes of Transmission Foodhandler contamination of items in

restaurant Daycare centers Secondary person-to-person Aerosolized (vomiting and diarrhea) Cleaning up after ill person in a bathroom

Immunity amp Epidemiology

Seems to be strain-specific and temporary (few months)

CDC estimates 23 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually in US due to noroviruses

CDC estimates noroviruses cause ~50 of all foodborne disease outbreaks

Detection

Best method is via reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Viral RNA Adults can shed viral particles for up to 2

weeks after symptoms resolve Infants and toddlers may shed longer

Case Study

Small state university north of Houston TX

Student body ~ 10000 students

2054 students owned meal plans

125 students present to student health center and local hospital with gastrointenteritis in 24 hr period

Symptoms

125 ill students on March 10-11 1998 23 admitted to hospital 91 reported vomiting 85 reported diarrhea (3+ loose stools in

24 hours) 68 reported abdominal cramps

Epidemic Curve

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Date 5-Mar

6-Mar

7-Mar

8-Mar

9-Mar

10-Mar

11-Mar

12-Mar

13-Mar

14-Mar

15-Mar

Cases by Onset Date

Laboratory Investigation

62 stool samples sent to Texas Department of Health Lab in Austin

All negative for Salmonella Shigella Campylobacter Yersinia E coli O157H7 Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus

18 samples tested for Norovirus by RT-PCR 9 were positive

Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks Verifying Exposures Identifying potential

healthy controls Finding people to

interview them Hundreds of food

items Rule inout other

exposures

Rapid Action

Outbreak occurred toward end of week right before Spring Break

Sanitarians from local health department investigated realized cafeteria was about to close for week and perform massive cleaningmaintenance

Locked down all present food items instructed staff not to throw anything out

Epidemiologic Investigation

Unmatched Case-control study by Texas Dept of Health

36 ill subjects 136 well controls

Matched Case-control study by CDC

29 ill subjects 29 well controls

Findings ndash Matched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

110 16-473 lt 001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

60 07-276 006

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

80 11-355 002

Deli sandwich 310 supper

10 001-79 75

Findings ndash Unmatched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

111 39-32 lt 0001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

71 16-33 lt001

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

57 2-16 lt0001

Deli sandwich 310 supper

33 06-20 11

Any deli sandwich on 39 or 310

168 62-47 lt0001

Interpretation

Both studies implicated deli sandwiches on 39 and 310

The more controls in a study the better statistical power you have

No other restaurants or food items showed any association

Cafeteria Staff Investigation

Sanitarians and epidemiologists interviewed foodhandlers

All denied illness All except one submitted stool samples for

testing One refused cafeteria manager fired her She was responsible for slicing deli meats

and making deli sandwiches

Discussion

CDC and TDH epidemiologists were disappointed with cafeteria manager decision to fire the one employee

Much more difficult to get cooperation Eventually did interview her She denied illness but had infant with

diarrhea Stool sample from infant was PCR

positive for Norovirus

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 3: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Symptoms

Incubation period ~ 24-48 hours can be less Vomiting Watery non-bloody diarrhea Abdominal cramps Nausea Low-grade fever Symptoms typically resolve ~ 24-60 hours (1-3

days)

Documented Modes of Transmission Foodhandler contamination of items in

restaurant Daycare centers Secondary person-to-person Aerosolized (vomiting and diarrhea) Cleaning up after ill person in a bathroom

Immunity amp Epidemiology

Seems to be strain-specific and temporary (few months)

CDC estimates 23 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually in US due to noroviruses

CDC estimates noroviruses cause ~50 of all foodborne disease outbreaks

Detection

Best method is via reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Viral RNA Adults can shed viral particles for up to 2

weeks after symptoms resolve Infants and toddlers may shed longer

Case Study

Small state university north of Houston TX

Student body ~ 10000 students

2054 students owned meal plans

125 students present to student health center and local hospital with gastrointenteritis in 24 hr period

Symptoms

125 ill students on March 10-11 1998 23 admitted to hospital 91 reported vomiting 85 reported diarrhea (3+ loose stools in

24 hours) 68 reported abdominal cramps

Epidemic Curve

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Date 5-Mar

6-Mar

7-Mar

8-Mar

9-Mar

10-Mar

11-Mar

12-Mar

13-Mar

14-Mar

15-Mar

Cases by Onset Date

Laboratory Investigation

62 stool samples sent to Texas Department of Health Lab in Austin

All negative for Salmonella Shigella Campylobacter Yersinia E coli O157H7 Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus

18 samples tested for Norovirus by RT-PCR 9 were positive

Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks Verifying Exposures Identifying potential

healthy controls Finding people to

interview them Hundreds of food

items Rule inout other

exposures

Rapid Action

Outbreak occurred toward end of week right before Spring Break

Sanitarians from local health department investigated realized cafeteria was about to close for week and perform massive cleaningmaintenance

Locked down all present food items instructed staff not to throw anything out

Epidemiologic Investigation

Unmatched Case-control study by Texas Dept of Health

36 ill subjects 136 well controls

Matched Case-control study by CDC

29 ill subjects 29 well controls

Findings ndash Matched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

110 16-473 lt 001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

60 07-276 006

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

80 11-355 002

Deli sandwich 310 supper

10 001-79 75

Findings ndash Unmatched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

111 39-32 lt 0001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

71 16-33 lt001

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

57 2-16 lt0001

Deli sandwich 310 supper

33 06-20 11

Any deli sandwich on 39 or 310

168 62-47 lt0001

Interpretation

Both studies implicated deli sandwiches on 39 and 310

The more controls in a study the better statistical power you have

No other restaurants or food items showed any association

Cafeteria Staff Investigation

Sanitarians and epidemiologists interviewed foodhandlers

All denied illness All except one submitted stool samples for

testing One refused cafeteria manager fired her She was responsible for slicing deli meats

and making deli sandwiches

Discussion

CDC and TDH epidemiologists were disappointed with cafeteria manager decision to fire the one employee

Much more difficult to get cooperation Eventually did interview her She denied illness but had infant with

diarrhea Stool sample from infant was PCR

positive for Norovirus

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 4: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Documented Modes of Transmission Foodhandler contamination of items in

restaurant Daycare centers Secondary person-to-person Aerosolized (vomiting and diarrhea) Cleaning up after ill person in a bathroom

Immunity amp Epidemiology

Seems to be strain-specific and temporary (few months)

CDC estimates 23 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually in US due to noroviruses

CDC estimates noroviruses cause ~50 of all foodborne disease outbreaks

Detection

Best method is via reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Viral RNA Adults can shed viral particles for up to 2

weeks after symptoms resolve Infants and toddlers may shed longer

Case Study

Small state university north of Houston TX

Student body ~ 10000 students

2054 students owned meal plans

125 students present to student health center and local hospital with gastrointenteritis in 24 hr period

Symptoms

125 ill students on March 10-11 1998 23 admitted to hospital 91 reported vomiting 85 reported diarrhea (3+ loose stools in

24 hours) 68 reported abdominal cramps

Epidemic Curve

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Date 5-Mar

6-Mar

7-Mar

8-Mar

9-Mar

10-Mar

11-Mar

12-Mar

13-Mar

14-Mar

15-Mar

Cases by Onset Date

Laboratory Investigation

62 stool samples sent to Texas Department of Health Lab in Austin

All negative for Salmonella Shigella Campylobacter Yersinia E coli O157H7 Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus

18 samples tested for Norovirus by RT-PCR 9 were positive

Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks Verifying Exposures Identifying potential

healthy controls Finding people to

interview them Hundreds of food

items Rule inout other

exposures

Rapid Action

Outbreak occurred toward end of week right before Spring Break

Sanitarians from local health department investigated realized cafeteria was about to close for week and perform massive cleaningmaintenance

Locked down all present food items instructed staff not to throw anything out

Epidemiologic Investigation

Unmatched Case-control study by Texas Dept of Health

36 ill subjects 136 well controls

Matched Case-control study by CDC

29 ill subjects 29 well controls

Findings ndash Matched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

110 16-473 lt 001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

60 07-276 006

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

80 11-355 002

Deli sandwich 310 supper

10 001-79 75

Findings ndash Unmatched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

111 39-32 lt 0001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

71 16-33 lt001

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

57 2-16 lt0001

Deli sandwich 310 supper

33 06-20 11

Any deli sandwich on 39 or 310

168 62-47 lt0001

Interpretation

Both studies implicated deli sandwiches on 39 and 310

The more controls in a study the better statistical power you have

No other restaurants or food items showed any association

Cafeteria Staff Investigation

Sanitarians and epidemiologists interviewed foodhandlers

All denied illness All except one submitted stool samples for

testing One refused cafeteria manager fired her She was responsible for slicing deli meats

and making deli sandwiches

Discussion

CDC and TDH epidemiologists were disappointed with cafeteria manager decision to fire the one employee

Much more difficult to get cooperation Eventually did interview her She denied illness but had infant with

diarrhea Stool sample from infant was PCR

positive for Norovirus

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 5: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Immunity amp Epidemiology

Seems to be strain-specific and temporary (few months)

CDC estimates 23 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually in US due to noroviruses

CDC estimates noroviruses cause ~50 of all foodborne disease outbreaks

Detection

Best method is via reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Viral RNA Adults can shed viral particles for up to 2

weeks after symptoms resolve Infants and toddlers may shed longer

Case Study

Small state university north of Houston TX

Student body ~ 10000 students

2054 students owned meal plans

125 students present to student health center and local hospital with gastrointenteritis in 24 hr period

Symptoms

125 ill students on March 10-11 1998 23 admitted to hospital 91 reported vomiting 85 reported diarrhea (3+ loose stools in

24 hours) 68 reported abdominal cramps

Epidemic Curve

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Date 5-Mar

6-Mar

7-Mar

8-Mar

9-Mar

10-Mar

11-Mar

12-Mar

13-Mar

14-Mar

15-Mar

Cases by Onset Date

Laboratory Investigation

62 stool samples sent to Texas Department of Health Lab in Austin

All negative for Salmonella Shigella Campylobacter Yersinia E coli O157H7 Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus

18 samples tested for Norovirus by RT-PCR 9 were positive

Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks Verifying Exposures Identifying potential

healthy controls Finding people to

interview them Hundreds of food

items Rule inout other

exposures

Rapid Action

Outbreak occurred toward end of week right before Spring Break

Sanitarians from local health department investigated realized cafeteria was about to close for week and perform massive cleaningmaintenance

Locked down all present food items instructed staff not to throw anything out

Epidemiologic Investigation

Unmatched Case-control study by Texas Dept of Health

36 ill subjects 136 well controls

Matched Case-control study by CDC

29 ill subjects 29 well controls

Findings ndash Matched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

110 16-473 lt 001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

60 07-276 006

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

80 11-355 002

Deli sandwich 310 supper

10 001-79 75

Findings ndash Unmatched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

111 39-32 lt 0001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

71 16-33 lt001

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

57 2-16 lt0001

Deli sandwich 310 supper

33 06-20 11

Any deli sandwich on 39 or 310

168 62-47 lt0001

Interpretation

Both studies implicated deli sandwiches on 39 and 310

The more controls in a study the better statistical power you have

No other restaurants or food items showed any association

Cafeteria Staff Investigation

Sanitarians and epidemiologists interviewed foodhandlers

All denied illness All except one submitted stool samples for

testing One refused cafeteria manager fired her She was responsible for slicing deli meats

and making deli sandwiches

Discussion

CDC and TDH epidemiologists were disappointed with cafeteria manager decision to fire the one employee

Much more difficult to get cooperation Eventually did interview her She denied illness but had infant with

diarrhea Stool sample from infant was PCR

positive for Norovirus

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 6: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Detection

Best method is via reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Viral RNA Adults can shed viral particles for up to 2

weeks after symptoms resolve Infants and toddlers may shed longer

Case Study

Small state university north of Houston TX

Student body ~ 10000 students

2054 students owned meal plans

125 students present to student health center and local hospital with gastrointenteritis in 24 hr period

Symptoms

125 ill students on March 10-11 1998 23 admitted to hospital 91 reported vomiting 85 reported diarrhea (3+ loose stools in

24 hours) 68 reported abdominal cramps

Epidemic Curve

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Date 5-Mar

6-Mar

7-Mar

8-Mar

9-Mar

10-Mar

11-Mar

12-Mar

13-Mar

14-Mar

15-Mar

Cases by Onset Date

Laboratory Investigation

62 stool samples sent to Texas Department of Health Lab in Austin

All negative for Salmonella Shigella Campylobacter Yersinia E coli O157H7 Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus

18 samples tested for Norovirus by RT-PCR 9 were positive

Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks Verifying Exposures Identifying potential

healthy controls Finding people to

interview them Hundreds of food

items Rule inout other

exposures

Rapid Action

Outbreak occurred toward end of week right before Spring Break

Sanitarians from local health department investigated realized cafeteria was about to close for week and perform massive cleaningmaintenance

Locked down all present food items instructed staff not to throw anything out

Epidemiologic Investigation

Unmatched Case-control study by Texas Dept of Health

36 ill subjects 136 well controls

Matched Case-control study by CDC

29 ill subjects 29 well controls

Findings ndash Matched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

110 16-473 lt 001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

60 07-276 006

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

80 11-355 002

Deli sandwich 310 supper

10 001-79 75

Findings ndash Unmatched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

111 39-32 lt 0001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

71 16-33 lt001

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

57 2-16 lt0001

Deli sandwich 310 supper

33 06-20 11

Any deli sandwich on 39 or 310

168 62-47 lt0001

Interpretation

Both studies implicated deli sandwiches on 39 and 310

The more controls in a study the better statistical power you have

No other restaurants or food items showed any association

Cafeteria Staff Investigation

Sanitarians and epidemiologists interviewed foodhandlers

All denied illness All except one submitted stool samples for

testing One refused cafeteria manager fired her She was responsible for slicing deli meats

and making deli sandwiches

Discussion

CDC and TDH epidemiologists were disappointed with cafeteria manager decision to fire the one employee

Much more difficult to get cooperation Eventually did interview her She denied illness but had infant with

diarrhea Stool sample from infant was PCR

positive for Norovirus

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 7: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Case Study

Small state university north of Houston TX

Student body ~ 10000 students

2054 students owned meal plans

125 students present to student health center and local hospital with gastrointenteritis in 24 hr period

Symptoms

125 ill students on March 10-11 1998 23 admitted to hospital 91 reported vomiting 85 reported diarrhea (3+ loose stools in

24 hours) 68 reported abdominal cramps

Epidemic Curve

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Date 5-Mar

6-Mar

7-Mar

8-Mar

9-Mar

10-Mar

11-Mar

12-Mar

13-Mar

14-Mar

15-Mar

Cases by Onset Date

Laboratory Investigation

62 stool samples sent to Texas Department of Health Lab in Austin

All negative for Salmonella Shigella Campylobacter Yersinia E coli O157H7 Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus

18 samples tested for Norovirus by RT-PCR 9 were positive

Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks Verifying Exposures Identifying potential

healthy controls Finding people to

interview them Hundreds of food

items Rule inout other

exposures

Rapid Action

Outbreak occurred toward end of week right before Spring Break

Sanitarians from local health department investigated realized cafeteria was about to close for week and perform massive cleaningmaintenance

Locked down all present food items instructed staff not to throw anything out

Epidemiologic Investigation

Unmatched Case-control study by Texas Dept of Health

36 ill subjects 136 well controls

Matched Case-control study by CDC

29 ill subjects 29 well controls

Findings ndash Matched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

110 16-473 lt 001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

60 07-276 006

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

80 11-355 002

Deli sandwich 310 supper

10 001-79 75

Findings ndash Unmatched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

111 39-32 lt 0001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

71 16-33 lt001

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

57 2-16 lt0001

Deli sandwich 310 supper

33 06-20 11

Any deli sandwich on 39 or 310

168 62-47 lt0001

Interpretation

Both studies implicated deli sandwiches on 39 and 310

The more controls in a study the better statistical power you have

No other restaurants or food items showed any association

Cafeteria Staff Investigation

Sanitarians and epidemiologists interviewed foodhandlers

All denied illness All except one submitted stool samples for

testing One refused cafeteria manager fired her She was responsible for slicing deli meats

and making deli sandwiches

Discussion

CDC and TDH epidemiologists were disappointed with cafeteria manager decision to fire the one employee

Much more difficult to get cooperation Eventually did interview her She denied illness but had infant with

diarrhea Stool sample from infant was PCR

positive for Norovirus

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 8: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Symptoms

125 ill students on March 10-11 1998 23 admitted to hospital 91 reported vomiting 85 reported diarrhea (3+ loose stools in

24 hours) 68 reported abdominal cramps

Epidemic Curve

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Date 5-Mar

6-Mar

7-Mar

8-Mar

9-Mar

10-Mar

11-Mar

12-Mar

13-Mar

14-Mar

15-Mar

Cases by Onset Date

Laboratory Investigation

62 stool samples sent to Texas Department of Health Lab in Austin

All negative for Salmonella Shigella Campylobacter Yersinia E coli O157H7 Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus

18 samples tested for Norovirus by RT-PCR 9 were positive

Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks Verifying Exposures Identifying potential

healthy controls Finding people to

interview them Hundreds of food

items Rule inout other

exposures

Rapid Action

Outbreak occurred toward end of week right before Spring Break

Sanitarians from local health department investigated realized cafeteria was about to close for week and perform massive cleaningmaintenance

Locked down all present food items instructed staff not to throw anything out

Epidemiologic Investigation

Unmatched Case-control study by Texas Dept of Health

36 ill subjects 136 well controls

Matched Case-control study by CDC

29 ill subjects 29 well controls

Findings ndash Matched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

110 16-473 lt 001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

60 07-276 006

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

80 11-355 002

Deli sandwich 310 supper

10 001-79 75

Findings ndash Unmatched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

111 39-32 lt 0001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

71 16-33 lt001

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

57 2-16 lt0001

Deli sandwich 310 supper

33 06-20 11

Any deli sandwich on 39 or 310

168 62-47 lt0001

Interpretation

Both studies implicated deli sandwiches on 39 and 310

The more controls in a study the better statistical power you have

No other restaurants or food items showed any association

Cafeteria Staff Investigation

Sanitarians and epidemiologists interviewed foodhandlers

All denied illness All except one submitted stool samples for

testing One refused cafeteria manager fired her She was responsible for slicing deli meats

and making deli sandwiches

Discussion

CDC and TDH epidemiologists were disappointed with cafeteria manager decision to fire the one employee

Much more difficult to get cooperation Eventually did interview her She denied illness but had infant with

diarrhea Stool sample from infant was PCR

positive for Norovirus

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 9: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Epidemic Curve

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Date 5-Mar

6-Mar

7-Mar

8-Mar

9-Mar

10-Mar

11-Mar

12-Mar

13-Mar

14-Mar

15-Mar

Cases by Onset Date

Laboratory Investigation

62 stool samples sent to Texas Department of Health Lab in Austin

All negative for Salmonella Shigella Campylobacter Yersinia E coli O157H7 Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus

18 samples tested for Norovirus by RT-PCR 9 were positive

Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks Verifying Exposures Identifying potential

healthy controls Finding people to

interview them Hundreds of food

items Rule inout other

exposures

Rapid Action

Outbreak occurred toward end of week right before Spring Break

Sanitarians from local health department investigated realized cafeteria was about to close for week and perform massive cleaningmaintenance

Locked down all present food items instructed staff not to throw anything out

Epidemiologic Investigation

Unmatched Case-control study by Texas Dept of Health

36 ill subjects 136 well controls

Matched Case-control study by CDC

29 ill subjects 29 well controls

Findings ndash Matched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

110 16-473 lt 001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

60 07-276 006

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

80 11-355 002

Deli sandwich 310 supper

10 001-79 75

Findings ndash Unmatched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

111 39-32 lt 0001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

71 16-33 lt001

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

57 2-16 lt0001

Deli sandwich 310 supper

33 06-20 11

Any deli sandwich on 39 or 310

168 62-47 lt0001

Interpretation

Both studies implicated deli sandwiches on 39 and 310

The more controls in a study the better statistical power you have

No other restaurants or food items showed any association

Cafeteria Staff Investigation

Sanitarians and epidemiologists interviewed foodhandlers

All denied illness All except one submitted stool samples for

testing One refused cafeteria manager fired her She was responsible for slicing deli meats

and making deli sandwiches

Discussion

CDC and TDH epidemiologists were disappointed with cafeteria manager decision to fire the one employee

Much more difficult to get cooperation Eventually did interview her She denied illness but had infant with

diarrhea Stool sample from infant was PCR

positive for Norovirus

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 10: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Laboratory Investigation

62 stool samples sent to Texas Department of Health Lab in Austin

All negative for Salmonella Shigella Campylobacter Yersinia E coli O157H7 Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus

18 samples tested for Norovirus by RT-PCR 9 were positive

Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks Verifying Exposures Identifying potential

healthy controls Finding people to

interview them Hundreds of food

items Rule inout other

exposures

Rapid Action

Outbreak occurred toward end of week right before Spring Break

Sanitarians from local health department investigated realized cafeteria was about to close for week and perform massive cleaningmaintenance

Locked down all present food items instructed staff not to throw anything out

Epidemiologic Investigation

Unmatched Case-control study by Texas Dept of Health

36 ill subjects 136 well controls

Matched Case-control study by CDC

29 ill subjects 29 well controls

Findings ndash Matched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

110 16-473 lt 001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

60 07-276 006

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

80 11-355 002

Deli sandwich 310 supper

10 001-79 75

Findings ndash Unmatched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

111 39-32 lt 0001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

71 16-33 lt001

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

57 2-16 lt0001

Deli sandwich 310 supper

33 06-20 11

Any deli sandwich on 39 or 310

168 62-47 lt0001

Interpretation

Both studies implicated deli sandwiches on 39 and 310

The more controls in a study the better statistical power you have

No other restaurants or food items showed any association

Cafeteria Staff Investigation

Sanitarians and epidemiologists interviewed foodhandlers

All denied illness All except one submitted stool samples for

testing One refused cafeteria manager fired her She was responsible for slicing deli meats

and making deli sandwiches

Discussion

CDC and TDH epidemiologists were disappointed with cafeteria manager decision to fire the one employee

Much more difficult to get cooperation Eventually did interview her She denied illness but had infant with

diarrhea Stool sample from infant was PCR

positive for Norovirus

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 11: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks Verifying Exposures Identifying potential

healthy controls Finding people to

interview them Hundreds of food

items Rule inout other

exposures

Rapid Action

Outbreak occurred toward end of week right before Spring Break

Sanitarians from local health department investigated realized cafeteria was about to close for week and perform massive cleaningmaintenance

Locked down all present food items instructed staff not to throw anything out

Epidemiologic Investigation

Unmatched Case-control study by Texas Dept of Health

36 ill subjects 136 well controls

Matched Case-control study by CDC

29 ill subjects 29 well controls

Findings ndash Matched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

110 16-473 lt 001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

60 07-276 006

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

80 11-355 002

Deli sandwich 310 supper

10 001-79 75

Findings ndash Unmatched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

111 39-32 lt 0001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

71 16-33 lt001

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

57 2-16 lt0001

Deli sandwich 310 supper

33 06-20 11

Any deli sandwich on 39 or 310

168 62-47 lt0001

Interpretation

Both studies implicated deli sandwiches on 39 and 310

The more controls in a study the better statistical power you have

No other restaurants or food items showed any association

Cafeteria Staff Investigation

Sanitarians and epidemiologists interviewed foodhandlers

All denied illness All except one submitted stool samples for

testing One refused cafeteria manager fired her She was responsible for slicing deli meats

and making deli sandwiches

Discussion

CDC and TDH epidemiologists were disappointed with cafeteria manager decision to fire the one employee

Much more difficult to get cooperation Eventually did interview her She denied illness but had infant with

diarrhea Stool sample from infant was PCR

positive for Norovirus

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 12: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Rapid Action

Outbreak occurred toward end of week right before Spring Break

Sanitarians from local health department investigated realized cafeteria was about to close for week and perform massive cleaningmaintenance

Locked down all present food items instructed staff not to throw anything out

Epidemiologic Investigation

Unmatched Case-control study by Texas Dept of Health

36 ill subjects 136 well controls

Matched Case-control study by CDC

29 ill subjects 29 well controls

Findings ndash Matched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

110 16-473 lt 001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

60 07-276 006

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

80 11-355 002

Deli sandwich 310 supper

10 001-79 75

Findings ndash Unmatched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

111 39-32 lt 0001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

71 16-33 lt001

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

57 2-16 lt0001

Deli sandwich 310 supper

33 06-20 11

Any deli sandwich on 39 or 310

168 62-47 lt0001

Interpretation

Both studies implicated deli sandwiches on 39 and 310

The more controls in a study the better statistical power you have

No other restaurants or food items showed any association

Cafeteria Staff Investigation

Sanitarians and epidemiologists interviewed foodhandlers

All denied illness All except one submitted stool samples for

testing One refused cafeteria manager fired her She was responsible for slicing deli meats

and making deli sandwiches

Discussion

CDC and TDH epidemiologists were disappointed with cafeteria manager decision to fire the one employee

Much more difficult to get cooperation Eventually did interview her She denied illness but had infant with

diarrhea Stool sample from infant was PCR

positive for Norovirus

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 13: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Epidemiologic Investigation

Unmatched Case-control study by Texas Dept of Health

36 ill subjects 136 well controls

Matched Case-control study by CDC

29 ill subjects 29 well controls

Findings ndash Matched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

110 16-473 lt 001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

60 07-276 006

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

80 11-355 002

Deli sandwich 310 supper

10 001-79 75

Findings ndash Unmatched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

111 39-32 lt 0001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

71 16-33 lt001

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

57 2-16 lt0001

Deli sandwich 310 supper

33 06-20 11

Any deli sandwich on 39 or 310

168 62-47 lt0001

Interpretation

Both studies implicated deli sandwiches on 39 and 310

The more controls in a study the better statistical power you have

No other restaurants or food items showed any association

Cafeteria Staff Investigation

Sanitarians and epidemiologists interviewed foodhandlers

All denied illness All except one submitted stool samples for

testing One refused cafeteria manager fired her She was responsible for slicing deli meats

and making deli sandwiches

Discussion

CDC and TDH epidemiologists were disappointed with cafeteria manager decision to fire the one employee

Much more difficult to get cooperation Eventually did interview her She denied illness but had infant with

diarrhea Stool sample from infant was PCR

positive for Norovirus

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 14: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Findings ndash Matched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

110 16-473 lt 001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

60 07-276 006

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

80 11-355 002

Deli sandwich 310 supper

10 001-79 75

Findings ndash Unmatched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

111 39-32 lt 0001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

71 16-33 lt001

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

57 2-16 lt0001

Deli sandwich 310 supper

33 06-20 11

Any deli sandwich on 39 or 310

168 62-47 lt0001

Interpretation

Both studies implicated deli sandwiches on 39 and 310

The more controls in a study the better statistical power you have

No other restaurants or food items showed any association

Cafeteria Staff Investigation

Sanitarians and epidemiologists interviewed foodhandlers

All denied illness All except one submitted stool samples for

testing One refused cafeteria manager fired her She was responsible for slicing deli meats

and making deli sandwiches

Discussion

CDC and TDH epidemiologists were disappointed with cafeteria manager decision to fire the one employee

Much more difficult to get cooperation Eventually did interview her She denied illness but had infant with

diarrhea Stool sample from infant was PCR

positive for Norovirus

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 15: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Findings ndash Unmatched Study Exposure Odds Ratio Confidence

Intervals P value

Deli sandwich 39 lunch

111 39-32 lt 0001

Deli sandwich 39 supper

71 16-33 lt001

Deli sandwich 310 lunch

57 2-16 lt0001

Deli sandwich 310 supper

33 06-20 11

Any deli sandwich on 39 or 310

168 62-47 lt0001

Interpretation

Both studies implicated deli sandwiches on 39 and 310

The more controls in a study the better statistical power you have

No other restaurants or food items showed any association

Cafeteria Staff Investigation

Sanitarians and epidemiologists interviewed foodhandlers

All denied illness All except one submitted stool samples for

testing One refused cafeteria manager fired her She was responsible for slicing deli meats

and making deli sandwiches

Discussion

CDC and TDH epidemiologists were disappointed with cafeteria manager decision to fire the one employee

Much more difficult to get cooperation Eventually did interview her She denied illness but had infant with

diarrhea Stool sample from infant was PCR

positive for Norovirus

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 16: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Interpretation

Both studies implicated deli sandwiches on 39 and 310

The more controls in a study the better statistical power you have

No other restaurants or food items showed any association

Cafeteria Staff Investigation

Sanitarians and epidemiologists interviewed foodhandlers

All denied illness All except one submitted stool samples for

testing One refused cafeteria manager fired her She was responsible for slicing deli meats

and making deli sandwiches

Discussion

CDC and TDH epidemiologists were disappointed with cafeteria manager decision to fire the one employee

Much more difficult to get cooperation Eventually did interview her She denied illness but had infant with

diarrhea Stool sample from infant was PCR

positive for Norovirus

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 17: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Cafeteria Staff Investigation

Sanitarians and epidemiologists interviewed foodhandlers

All denied illness All except one submitted stool samples for

testing One refused cafeteria manager fired her She was responsible for slicing deli meats

and making deli sandwiches

Discussion

CDC and TDH epidemiologists were disappointed with cafeteria manager decision to fire the one employee

Much more difficult to get cooperation Eventually did interview her She denied illness but had infant with

diarrhea Stool sample from infant was PCR

positive for Norovirus

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 18: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Discussion

CDC and TDH epidemiologists were disappointed with cafeteria manager decision to fire the one employee

Much more difficult to get cooperation Eventually did interview her She denied illness but had infant with

diarrhea Stool sample from infant was PCR

positive for Norovirus

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 19: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Chance to Learn Something

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine agreed to try to find virus RNA on deli meat

Never been done before

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 20: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Success

Lab successful in designing protocol for recovering virus RNA from deli meat

Pulsed-Field Gel analysis of PCR results showed identical pattern between infant ill students and deli meats

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points
Page 21: Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Studyehs.ncpublichealth.com/faf/food/fd/docs/Norovirusesand... · Investigating Noroviruses: A Case Study David Bergmire-Sweat, ... Watery non-bloody

Take Home Points

Viral gastroenteritis is easy to spread Foodhandlers must be extremely careful

even when they are not sick with hygiene It is possible to recover Norovirus from

food Quick reaction by local health department

sanitarians preserved food samples Collaboration with research lab advanced

science of food safety research

  • Investigating Noroviruses A Case Study
  • Norovirus Facts
  • Symptoms
  • Documented Modes of Transmission
  • Immunity amp Epidemiology
  • Detection
  • Case Study
  • Symptoms
  • Epidemic Curve
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Challenges of Cafeteria Outbreaks
  • Rapid Action
  • Epidemiologic Investigation
  • Findings ndash Matched Study
  • Findings ndash Unmatched Study
  • Interpretation
  • Cafeteria Staff Investigation
  • Discussion
  • Chance to Learn Something
  • Success
  • Take Home Points