iogp data series
TRANSCRIPT
IOGP Data Series
SEPTEMBER2019
Data can play a vital role in improving performance. Every year, we collect data covering a range of topics on worldwide upstream operations, onshore and offshore, from participating member companies.
Safety performance indicatorsWe started collecting upstream safety data in 1985, and now have the industry’s largest database of safety performance, covering participating member company employees and their contractors onshore and offshore.
Our annual reports analyse results for key indicators by region, function and company:
• Number of fatalities, fatal accident rate, fatal incident rate• Total recordable injury rate, lost time injury frequency• Number of lost work day cases and the number of
days lost• Number of restricted work day cases and the number
of restricted work days• Number of medical treatment cases
The latest report (2018 IOGP Safety Performance Indicators) shows that the Fatal Accident Rate for reporting companies has fallen by 8% compared with 2017. The number of fatalities has decreased from 33 in 2017 to 31 in 2018.
The number of fatal incidents has also decreased from 30 in 2017 to 27 in 2018. This is against the background of a 2% increase in work hours reported.
Safety performance indicators – Process safety eventsWe started a pilot project collecting Process Safety Event data in 2010 and have published an annual report since 2011.
The process safety events (PSE) data are based on the numbers of Tier 1 and Tier 2 process safety events reported by participating IOGP member companies, separately for:
• Onshore and offshore
• Drilling and production
• Activities
• Consequences
• Material released
The data are normalised against work hours associated with drilling and production work hours to provide PSE rates.
PSE Rate – Tier 1 and Tier 2
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
20182017201620152014201320122011
PSE
per m
illio
n w
ork
hour
s
Tier 1
0.29
0.19 0.190.14 0.14 0.13
0.52 0.50
0.61
0.50
Tier 2
0.44
0.16
0.440.39
0.16
0.39
Number of fatalities and fatal accident rate (2009–2018)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
20182017201620152014201320122011201020090.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Num
ber o
f fat
aliti
es
FAR
fata
litie
s pe
r 100
mill
ion
hour
s w
orke
d
67
94
58
99
Fatal accident rate (FAR)Fatalities Fatal Incidents
65
50
88
52
80
43 45 42
54
4050
29 30332731
IOGP Data Series www.iogp.org/bookstore/product-category/data-series
IOGP Data Series www.iogp.org/bookstore/product-category/data-series
Well control incidents and safety alertsIOGP Members also report well control incidents and safety alerts, you can find these – as well as narratives for all fatal events – on the IOGP Safety Zone at http://safetyzone.iogp.org
Safety performance indicators – Aviation accidentsThis report presents the safety performance of the aviation industry involved in both upstream and downstream operations reported by participating IOGP member companies for 2013-2018.
The key indicators for analysis of aviation operations and safety performance are:
• numbers of fatalities• accidents recorded• hours flown• passengers carried• flights performed
Safety performance indicators – Motor Vehicle CrashesThis report presents contributing IOGP Members’ global results for:
• Number of motor vehicle crash (MVC) fatalities
• Number of MVC for each reporting group and category
• MVC rate (motor vehicle crashes per million kilometres) for each reporting group and category.
Reporting companies will typically report their own data as well as that of their associated contractors. The indicators are analysed by region for both company and contractor data.
Work-related land transport fatalities reported to IOGP
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40 Land transport fatalities due to assault/violent acts
Land transport fatalities excluding assault/violent acts
Land transport fatal incidents
2018201720162015201420132012201120102009200820072006200520042003200220012000
Report 365 first published
April 2005
Fata
litie
s an
d fa
tal i
ncid
ents
Level of reporting by participating companies for helicopter operations
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
900000
2018201720162015201420130
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Num
ber o
f hou
rs fl
own
or n
umbe
r of f
light
s
Num
ber of helicopters
Hours flown Number of flights Total helicopter fleet
IOGP Data Series www.iogp.org/bookstore/product-category/data-series
Health leading performance indicatorsIOGP and IPIECA have developed two tools to assess health leading performance indicators within individual companies. These enable performance comparison between different parts of a company and between participating companies.
Percentage tool – 2018 HPI average values
1
2
3
4Public health interface and promotion of good health
(3.42)
Health reporting andrecord management
(3.57)
Health impact assessment(2.78)
Fitness for task assessment and health surveillance
(3.40)
Management of ill-health in the workplace(3.73)
Medical emergency management(3.61)
Industrial hygiene and control of workplace exposures(3.37)
Health risk assessment and planning
(3.31)
Environmental performance indicatorsWe have collected and published environmental data from our member companies on an annual basis since 2001. The database now represents about one third of known hydrocarbon production.
Information is aggregated at both global and regional levels and is expressed within the following environmental indicator categories:
• gaseous emissions• energy consumption• flaring• produced water• non-aqueous drilling fluids retained on cuttings
discharged to sea• spills• fresh water
Hydrocarbon flared per unit of hydrocarbon production (by region)
Tonn
es h
ydro
carb
on fl
ared
pe
r tho
usan
d to
nnes
pro
duct
ion
62%33%
95%
10%20%
34%0
10
20
30
40
50
South &CentralAmerica
Russia &Central
Asia
NorthAmerica
MiddleEast
EuropeAsia/Australasia
Africa
6.07.8
Overall 12.1
6.55.0
2.9
19.6
35.6
2017
2016
2015
2017 overall
Table 13: Gap analysis tool 2018 results for Element 4 – Management of ill-health in the workplace
Company Code
Results by statement score Average by company
G B E C A F D
NN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.3
SC 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
BP 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.1
MC 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.4
OQ 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.4
DP 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.6
IJ 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7
IN 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.7
YF 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7
AR 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.9
BH 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.9
EF 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.9
WD 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.9
AI 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
AP 4.0 4.0 n/a 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
BW 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
CF 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
CT 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
GJ 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
HC 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
HG 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
ID 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
IV 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
KN 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
MB 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
PB 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
RA 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
RD 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
TD 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
VC 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
VG 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
YT 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
YU 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Average by statement 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.9
Sorted by statement score, lowest to highest (33 companies took part)Note: assigned company codes change every year
Health leading performance indicators – 2018 data / Gap analysis tool results
33
Gap analysis tool 2018 results for Element 4 – Management of ill-health in the workplace
Registered Office: City Tower, Level 14, 40 Basinghall Street, London EC2V 5DE, United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 3763 9700 [email protected] Office: Avenue de Tervuren 188A, B-1150 Brussels, Belgium T +32 (0)2 790 7762 [email protected] Houston Office: 19219 Katy Freeway, Suite 175, Houston, TX 77094, USA T +1 (713) 261 0411 [email protected]
www.iogp.org