issue - ii • volume - vii • november - 2011 update
TRANSCRIPT
UPDATE
THISMONTH
4U
November - 2011 W E B E L I E V E I N
IN THIS ISSUE
We believe in C-2
This Month 4 U C-2
Editorial 1
What's New 3
Sub-Contracor at per with Main Contractor in the service tax regime
..By Ashok B Nawal 21
Beyond the Onvious 23
Did you Miss this 29
Our Services 30
CSR C 3- 4
Payments Due Dates
Excise Duties-Oct 2011 05/11/11
Service Tax – Oct 2011 05/11/11
Excise Duties- Oct 2011 By E-Payment 06/11/11
Service Tax -Oct 2011–By E Payment 06/11/11
TDS/TCS- Oct 2011 07/11/11
Provident Fund-Oct 2011 15/11/2011
Central Sales Tax –Oct 2011Return-cum-Challan 21/11/2011
VAT – Oct 2011 21/11/2011
ESI Contribution 21/11/2011
Professional Tax 30/11/2011
Returns
ER-1 and ER-2 Monthly Return for Oct 2011 10/11/11
ER-4- 2010-11 30/11/11
ER-6- Oct 2011 10/11/11
E D I T O R I A LIt is an irony that once again the Greek Tragedy is
taking centre stage (pun intended). The only difference
now is that the phrase that was associated with a form of art
which in a way enthralled the audience is now refers to an
impending economic catastrophe. It also brings into sharp
focus the limits of capitalism in whichever form it is practiced
and the constraints of trade blocks, however well
intentioned they might be. Greece almost succeeded in
bringing the Euro Zone to its knees. By itself Greece may
be a tiny economy not capable of bringing down the
economic might of Europe but it holds out ominous
warnings to the entire Euro Zone which has countries like
Italy, Spain and Portuguese on the verge of bankruptcy. For
those outside it is a fascinating story unfolding. In a
tottering economy political stability becomes the first
casualty. Unpleasant decisions are called for, and the
layman has to have unshakable faith in the economist - tall
order indeed. With austerity measures and economic
sacrifices it is bound to test the limits of patience of the
population of any country. But Greece can take heart that if
Argentina and Russia could come out of such crises there is
still hope for Greece. Probably it will. But the real issue is
how many such passenger states the Euro Zone can afford
to carry. Austerity measures and fiscal sacrifices cannot
obviously be popular with the population of any country.
Consequently in these crisis times good economics is
disastrous politics – a modified cliché. Apparently the
whole thing looks like a case of economic mismanagement
and its consequences. It is definitely so; but what is more
important is that this crisis has shown the structural
deficiencies of the Euro Zone itself. The Euro Zone is all
about economic unification. But the Zone has no control or
influence over the social, cultural and political dynamics of
the member countries. How do you fix the economy of a
country without influencing the society first? As we go to
press there are rumours that a former Deputy President of
the European Central Bank is going to head the national
government. One is not sure whether the people of that
country know what is happening in India with a similar
experiment with an eminent economist at the helm in
government!
Staying abroad for a moment more let us look at what
happened at the recent G20 Summit. It was indeed a
Summit of disaster with the member countries working only
on a single point agenda of how to word the final joint
communiqué without the world knowing that it was indeed a
disaster. The one and only redeeming feature of the Summit
was the effort of the only non-government attendee of the
Summit who goes by the name Bill Gates. His pitch for a
financial transaction tax and his demand for the need to give
further thrust to education went largely unreported,
unnoticed and unheeded. After all, the heads of
governments are politicians first and their survival is more
important than their country's interest. It was touted at the
beginning of the Summit that it will fix the problem of Greece.
But the non European member countries knew better and
they refused to be drawn into this quagmire and they smartly
left it to the European Union to sort their own problems.
The instability in the world around us suddenly looks
quite scary. The Arab Spring, the Anna campaign, the
London Riots, the Chinese protests (they also protested!)
and now the 'Occupy-Wall-Street' movement. At no point in
time in living memory has there been such an upheaval
around the world at the same time. Rising food prices, huge
unemployment, lack of economic growth, rampant
corruption, governance deficit and a general sense of
disenchantment with the way the world operates have
brought the people of the world to the streets. It may be
manifesting in different ways; but in essence it appears to be
a movement of the people, for the people, by the people but
against the ruling dispensation. One has to wait and watch
what the future portends.
It would be fascinating to interview Ramalinga Raju of
Satyam fame after his recent release from the prison on bail.
After getting out of the prison he would have definitely
regretted his foolishness of admitting to committing frauds
and getting criminal actions initiated against him. He must
be feeling strange that when he is coming out of jail even if on
bail there are corporate executives making a beeline to the
prison and some others outside waiting in queue – all in the
name corporate governance or the lack of it. The venerable
names of Tatas, Ruias, Ambanis, Singhs, etc., etc., are all
there blemished and bruised beyond recognition. Raju must
be thinking that he happened to the unfortunate first fall guy
to go jail and earned an unfair adverse publicity.
November - 2011
1
November - 2011
2
When a government becomes a burden what does
the society do? They obviously fight back. When the civil
society falls apart what does the citizen do? This is not a
question for a quiz competition. In India governance has
virtually come to a standstill. The ruling party and
government are mired in corruption. The so called Civil
Society is falling apart. Economic reforms are a thing of the
past. Thanks to global factors inflation cannot be held in
check. When a common man is wondering how to find the
money for the next meal, the bureaucrats are struggling to
put together a formula to live within Rs.32/- a day! The
governments in the Euro Zone are imploding primarily
because of the decay which has set in their society. India is
no different. But then, whose country is it any way? It looks
like all of us trying to live up to the expectations of Winston
Churchill who once not-so-famously said 64 years ago that
we will become a corrupt nation run by politicians with
questionable integrity.
Next time if you happen to be in Pakistan, be careful
before you board an auto. It may be ferrying a mated
nuclear war-head along the busy and congested roads of
Pindi or Karachi. If a new article in “The Atlantic” is to be
believed, the Pakistani army is so scared of the Americans
after the latter's Obama operation that they constantly keep
shifting their nuclear arsenals either in mated or de-mated
conditions from one site to other without the knowledge of
the Americans. Conventional convoys which are visible to
the American satellites are, therefore, ruled out. We are
indeed living in dangerous times.
When a celebrity dies you mourn his death. You may
also feel bad that an eminent person passed away. But last
one month or so one got to see a few obituaries which went
beyond the normal passing away of a person. First it was
the Nawab of Patuadi. He continues to be a Nawab for an
entire generation even if the Government does not
recognise this title. Then there was Jagjit Singh. Before him
gazelles as a musical art form was not known to the aam
aadmi. It was he who popularised this music form to the
common man. If someone deserves to be called an inventor
of the future it was Steve Jobs. I knew none of them. They
did not have a chance of knowing me either. But in all these
cases I did indeed feel a sense of personal loss. This feeling
goes beyond the confines of a wreath. The feeling of this
sense of loss was indeed real and intense. They affected my
life in some way or other. When one feels bad when
somebody dies, it is never personal; but when one feels sad
at somebody's passing away it is indeed personal. Through
these columns I pay homage to these people who must have
affected a lot of people like me. Long live their souls in
heaven and long endure their work on earth.
Thank you.
Venkat R Venkitachalam
What's New…!!CUSTOMAnti Dumping Duty:
•Anti Dumping Duty on imports of Caustic Soda,
originating in, or exported from, Korea RP is
continued at reduced rate specified in the
notification and will be effective till 25th December,
2013 (CUS NTF NO. 94/2011 DATE 03/10/2011)
and (CUS NTF NO. 95/2011 DATE 03/10/2011)
•Anti Dumping Duty on Rubber Chemical PX-13
(6PPD), originating in, or exported from, Korea RP
(Heading 29,38) is continued at increased rate
specified in the notification and will be effective till
4th May, 2013 (CUS NTF NO. 92/2011 DATE
20/09/2011) and (CUS NTF NO. 93/2011 DATE
20/09/2011)
Tariff Notification
•All goods of the Chapter Heading 08041020 &
08041030 are included in the exemption
notification 21/2002 (Customs) and the rate of the
duty is brought down to 20% form 30%. (CUS NTF
NO. 97/2011 DATE 13/10/2011).
•Islamic Republic of Afghanistan has been included
as one of the beneficiary countries under SAFTA
(CUS NTF NO. 96/2011 DATE 12/10/2011)
Non-Tariff Notification
•CBEC revises tariff value of poppy seeds and brass
scrap (all grades) from 4241, 3061 to 3952 and
2207 respectively. (CUS NTF NO. 73/2011 (NT)
DATE 14/10/2011) and (CUS NTF NO. 71/2011
(NT) DATE 30/09/2011) CUS NTF NO. 76/2011 NT
Dt. 31/10/2011
•New duty drawback for certain items has been
notified after receiving representation also
correction in corresponding drawback Serial No.
against DEPB Serial No. has been amended.
Details are given separately in this issue.
Notification No. - 75 / 2011 - CUSTOMS (N.T.) dt.
28.10.2011
•On-site Post Clearance Audit at the Premises of
Importers and Exporters Regulations, 2011 has
been issued by CBEC. Under this regulation the
department will be authorized to conduct Audit of
Imports & Exports document and records
maintained for 5 years. (CUS NTF NO. 72/2011
(NT) DATE 04/10/2011)
•Exchange Rate for the month of October, 2011
related to Import/export goods is notified vive CUS
NTF NO. 70/2011 (NT) DATE 28/09/2011.
•The Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service
Tax Drawback Rules, 1995 has been amended by
issuing Customs, Central Excise Duties and
Service Tax Drawback (Amendment) Rules, 2011
and many more goods have been included in the
list on which the duty drawback will be now
available. (CUS NTF NO. 69/2011 (NT) DATE
22/09/2011)
Circulars:
•Re-Export of goods imported under reward
schemes and DEPB – Re-credit of duty –(CUS CIR
NO. 45/2011 DATE 13/10/2011) is now allowed
subject to following condition.
(I) re-export of goods shall take place from the same port from where the goods were imported
(ii) the goods are re-exported within 6 months from the date of import
(iii) the Asstt. /Dy. Commissioner of Customs
November - 2011
3
been made at par i. e. above Rs 5 lakhs and upto Rs
50 lakhs. [Circular No. 957/18/2011-CX-3 dated
25.10.2011]
•DG (Systems) has prepared comprehensive
instructions outlining the procedure for electronic
filing of Central Excise duty and Service Tax returns
and electronic payment of taxes under ACES and
enclosed to this Circular. Further it is also requested
that the trade and industry may be provided all
assistance so as to help them in adopting the new
procedure.. [Circular No. 956/17/2011-CX dated
28.09.2011]
SERVICE TAXNotification
•CBEC is empowered to prescribe the documents
required for registration under service tax and to
extend the period for filling the service tax return by
way of Order. Also provided that for the purposes of
ST-3 Form, the words “received /paid” used herein
shall be construed as “received or receivable /paid or
payable', as the case may be, in terms of the Point of
Taxation Rules, 2011 [Notification No. 48/2011 – ST
dated19.10.2011]
•CBEC extended the date of submission of half yearly
return for the period April 2011 to September 2011 th thfrom 25 October 2011 to 26 December 2011.
[Order No.1 ST dated 20.10.2011]
Circulars
•Service tax is not leviable on the works contract
service provided by sub-contractor to the main
contractor for completion of the main infrastructure
projects of execution of works contract in respect of
roads, airports, railways, transport terminals, bridges
tunnels and dams. [Circular No. 147/16/2011 –
Service Tax dated 21.10.2011]
Please read detailed article on the subject in this
issue.
FOREIGN TRADE POLICYDGFT Notifications
•Export of non-Basmati rice under Food Aid
Programme is permitted freely by Public Sector
Undertakings or by government organizations also.
is satisfied about the identity of the goods
(iv) The goods are not put into use after import
(v) At the time of allowing the re-export, Customs shall issue a re-credit Certificate containing particulars of scrip used, date of import of re-exported goods and amount debited while importing such goods. There
shall be no need for issue of fresh scrip in such
cases by DGFT regional offices
(vi) Customs shall permit use of the said re-credit
amount to the extent of 98% only; (vii) The validity
of re-credit certificate shall be for six months from
the date of issuance of re-credit certificate; and
(viii) The remittances have to be properly
accounted for as per the prevalent guidelines for
the import and the export of the goods.
•After notifying new duty drawback rate (All Industry
Rate) number of representation were received
and merit representation has been considered and
new rates has been notified for such merit
representation. Similarly it has been clarified that
when export are made against fulfillment of export
obligations under Advance Authorization / DFIA
then All Industry Rate will not be applicable but
drawback can be claimed under Brand Rate
Fixation (Circular No. – 48/2011-Customs) Dt. st31 Oct-2011]
•Subsequent to supreme court decisions with
respect to issuance of Show cause notice by
DGCEI / DRI which has been set a side on the
grounds of authority and subsequent amendment
in the Act, instructions have been issued for
reissuing the show cause notice by the respective
Commissionerate wherever these are not hit by
time limitation. (CUS CIR NO. 44/2011 DATE
23/09/2011)
CENTRAL EXCISETariff
• No new Notification
Non Tariff
•No new Notification
Circulars
•The monetary limit for adjudicating cases by Joint
Commissioners / Additional Commissioners had
November - 2011
4
comprehensive.
(ii) Exporters would now be required certify both (a)
that the items have been obtained/sourced from an
APEDA registered integrated abattoir or from
APEDA registered meat processing plant and (b)
that the raw material have been sourced exclusively
from APEDA registered integrated abattoir/abattoir.
(iii) Designated Veterinary Authority of the State are
now authorized to issue the certificate on the basis of
the inspections carried out by Veterinarians duly
registered under the Indian Veterinary Council Act
1984 employed by the exporting unit in relevant
laboratories. [Notification No. 82(RE-2010)/2009-st2014 Dated 31 October, 2011]
•In relaxation of the prohibition 1053.625 MTs of
Casein and Casein products already manufactured
on or before 18.02.2011 would be permitted to be
exported. [Notification No. 83(RE-2010)/2009-st2014 Dated 31 October, 2011.]
•The Status Holders shall also be eligible for the
Status Holders Incentive Scrip on exports made
during 2012-2013. [Notification No. 84(RE-st2010)/2009-2014 Dated 31 October, 2011.]
DGFT Circulars• DFIA authorizations issued on or after 13.10.2011
will be transmitted by DGFT 'on-line' to Customs.
Policy Circular No. 41 (RE-2010)2009-14 dated th13 October, 2011
•Only 33 items are eligible to get FPS benefit under
heading “Technical Textiles” as per Sr.No.33, of
Table 4, Appendix 37D of HBPv1. The list of 33
items, so eligible, is in the Annexure to this Policy
Circular and this list is applicable for export made
with effect from 01.04.2011. Policy Circular No. 42 st(RE-2010)/2009-14, 21 October, 2011
•Implementation of bar coding on tertiary packing of
consignments of pharmaceuticals and drugs for
export with effect from 01.10.2011 provided vide
Public Notice No. 59 dated 30.06.2011 is
compulsory for pharmaceuticals and drugs
manufactured on or after 01.10.2011. Policy thCircular No. 43 (RE-2010)/2009-14 Dated the 25
October, 2011.
Export of non-Basmati rice under agreement
between India and Maldives will be permitted.
Notification No 76 (RE – 2010)/2009-2014 dated rd23 Sept. 2011.
•Prohibition on export of edible oils has been
extended upto 30.09.2012. But, this restrication will
not apply to relaxations/exemption granted through
any earlier notifications. Export of fish oil continues
to be free as per Notification No. 60 dated
20.11.2008. Notification No 77 (RE – 2010)/2009-th2014 dated 28 Sept. 2011.
•Export of cotton waste including yarn waste and
garneted stock [ITC(HS) Code 5202] will continue
to be free. Registration of contracts for cotton
waste is not required now. Notification No. 78 th(RE-2010)/2009-14 dated 10 October, 2011.
•Export of products to notified countries (in Table 3 of
Appendix 37C of HBPv1) will be entitled for
additional duty credit scrip @ 1% of FOB value of
exports (in free foreign exchange) made with effect
from 01.04.2011 and Focus Products notified under
Table 8 of Appendix 37D shall be granted additional
duty credit scrip @ 1% of FOB value of exports (in
free foreign exchange) for exports made with effect
from 01.10.2011 till 31.03.2012. detailed analysis
on FTP has been covered in separate section in this
update. Notification No. 79(RE-2010)/2009-2014 thdated 13 October, 2011.
•The import of “Radioimmunoassay kits” (Medical
equipments containing radioactive isotopes) will
not require an import authorization from DGFT.
However, prior permission of AERB will be
required. Notification No. 80 (RE-2010)/2009-th2014 17 October,2011.
•Conditions for issue of import licenses of Rough
Marble Blocks for the balance quantity for Financial
year 2011-12 has been issued. Notification No. st81(RE-2010)/2009-2014 Dated 21 October,
2011.
•(i) All the amendments/changes made in Chapter 2
between August 2009 and September 2011 have
been incorporated in this notification to make it
5
November - 2011
Sr. No. / Table
VKGUY Product
Code
ITC HS Code
Items
3 [Table 1A]
3 Chapter 07 Edible vegetables (Table 1A)
15 [Table 1B]
15 15153090 Castor oil and its fractions- other than edible grade (Table 1B)
18 [Table 2]
18"Chapter 03,
1604 and 1605"
Marine Products (Table 2)
6
November - 2011
•Vide Circular No.4/2004-Cus. dated 16.1.2004
the facility to allow the conversion of free shipping
bills to export promotion schemes were
withdrawn. In this background, instructions were
issued to the Regional Authorities not to grant
DEPB benefits against such shipping bills which
were converted by the Customs authorities.
Some of the exporters approached High Courts
claiming that DEPB should be given in cases
where the conversions have been allowed by
Customs. Therefore, between the two material
dates i.e. between 28.1.2003 and 15.1.2004, in
case if the Commissioner of Customs has already
allowed the conversion of free Shipping Bill to
DEPB Shipping Bill, the DEPB claims can be
admitted. Accordingly, RAs are instructed to
decide the admissibility of DEPB claims. Old
cases which were rejected can also be reviewed.
Policy Circular No. 44 (RE-2010)/2009-14
dated 01.11.2011
•For the payment of compounding fees for
shortfall of export obligation to the extent of 1% of
FOB of exports in INR will be calculated based on
shortfall in foreign currency and exchange rate
considered at the time of issuance of Advance
Authorisation.. Policy Circular No. 45/2009-
2014 (RE 2010 Dated: 8th November, 2011
•Advance Author izat ion (on and af ter
01.04.2009), Export Promotion Capital Goods
(on and after 01.04.2009), Duty Free Import
Authorization (on and after 13.10.2011) and
DEPB (which is on EDI mode for almost 6 years).
Only these authorizations are therefore available
for 'on-line' verification. Other authorizations i.e.
Annual Advance Authorization, Annual EPCG,
SHIS, restricted / SCOMET import / export
authorization, Chapter 3 Reward Scheme are yet
to be covered under message exchange with
customs. Therefore, these authorizations need
to be registered / operated by custom on
production of physical copy of authorization only
with no 'on-line' verification. Policy Circular No. th46 (RE 2010) 2009-14 Dated 8 November,
2011.
•the following procedure to grant DEPB on the
export of “Cotton yarn including Melange yarn”
made between the period from 01.04.2011 to
04.08.2011 and on the export of “Cotton” made
between the period from 01.10.2010 to
04.08.2011 on the basis of “Free Shipping Bills”: -
(I) The exporters will apply to RA by feeding the details
of the “Free Shipping Bill” manually on their on-line
application;
(ii) A hard copy of the “Free Shipping Bill”, duly attested
by the exporter will be submitted to the RA.;
(iii) On the basis of the export description given on the
shipping bill, the RA will decide whether that export
product is entitled for DEPB or not; and
(iv) If the RA is satisfied that description of the export
product in the shipping bill is the same as in the
relevant DEPB entry, based on the FOB value of
the shipping bill/Bank Realisation Certificate
(BRC), the DEPB will be issued. Policy Circular
No. 47 (RE-2010)/2009-14 Dated: 08.11.2011 v
Public Notices
•5,175 MTs of raw sugar is permitted to be exported to
USA under Tariff Rate Quota by M/s. Indian Sugar
Exim Corporation Ltd. Export must be completed by
31.10.2011. Public Notice No. 78 (RE-2010)/2009-nd2014 dated 22 September, 2011.
•Regional Authorities (RAs) would now allow clubbing
of Advance Authorisations. This is a decentralising
measure. The exporters will not be required to
approach DGFT Headquarters in cases covered
under the above categories. Public Notice No. 79 th(RE-2010)/ 2009-14 Dated 13 October, 2011
•Amendments in the Reward/Incentive Schemes of
Chapter 3 of FTP 2009-14:- Appendix 37A, Appendix
37C and Appendix 37D of Handbook of Procedure
Vol.1 has been made. PUBLIC NOTICE No. 80 th(RE2010)/2009-14 Dated 13 October, 2011. Details
are given below.
In Appendix 37A of Vishesh Krishi and Gram Udyog
Yojana (VKGUY), the following products are deleted
from Table 1A, Table 1B and Table 2 respectively with
immediate effect:
Sr. No.
FPS Product Code
ITC (HS) Code Description LINKED MARKETS FOR FOCUS PRODUCTS
108 108 87019090 Agriculture Tractors having capacity in excess of 1800 cc.
Turkey
109 109 8402 High Pressure Boilers and Parts of High Pressure Boilers
"Egypt, Kenya, Tanzania, South Africa, Brazil”
110 110 840290 Parts of High Pressure Boilers
111 111 84029090 Other - High Pressure Boilers and Parts of High Pressure Boilers
112 112 8406 Steam Turbines and Vapour Turbines
113 113 84069000 Parts of Steam & Vapour Turbines
114 114 843830 Machinery for Sugar Manufacture
115 115 84389010 Parts of Sugar Manufacturing Machinery
116 116 84389090 Other Sugar Plant & Machinery and Parts thereof
117 117 847420 Plant & Machinery for Mineral Crushing and Grinding
118 118 84749090 Parts of Plant & Machinery for Mineral Crushing and Grinding
119 119 3215 "Printing Ink, Wring / Drawing Ink and Other Ink W/N Concentrated or Solid"
"Algeria, Egypt, Kenya, Nigeria, Tanzania, South Africa, Ukraine, Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, Cambodia,
Vietnam, China and Japan"
120 120 Chapter 61 & 62
Apparels i.e. Readymade Garments USA-Only for Exports upto 31.03.2012
121 121 Chapter 61 & 62
Apparels i.e. Readymade Garments EU-Only for Exports upto 31.03.2012
TABLE 6: NEW MARKET LINKED FOCUS PRODUCTS
•The following products are added in Table 6 of Appendix 37D (New MLFPS), for exports made with effect from
01.04.2011. Mexico is deleted from Table 3 and Table 6 of MLFPS from the date of this Public Notice.
12
•Liquid Paraffin can also be imported as an alternate input for manufacture of certain export products in thPlastic Product Group. PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 81 /(RE-2010)/2009-2014 Dated 14 October, 2011.
•Procedure for sale or transfer of imported firearms is simplified and prior permission from
DGFT is dispensed with in respect of some categories. Public Notice No. 82 /2009-2014 (RE-th2010) Dated 17 October, 2011
•Special Bonus Benefit for exports made from 01.10.2011 till 31.03.2012 will be available for the
specified product as per list published in Appendix 37D. List is separately given. PUBLIC NOTICE NO.83 st(RE2010)/2009-14 DATED 31 October 2011.
November - 2011
13
The following products are added in Table 7 of Appendix 37D (Focus Product Scheme) for exports made with effect
from 01.04.2011:
Sr. No. FPS Product Code
ITC (HS) Code Description
170 170 39232100 Sacks & Bags of Polyethylene (Incl Cones)
171 171 72024900 Other Ferro- Chromium
TABLE 7 : FOCUS PRODUCT(S) /SECTOR(S) - B O N U S B E N E F I T S
Sr. No.
FPS Product Code
ITC (HS) Code
Description
1 1 720292 Ferro Vanadium
2 2 720310 Ferrous products obtained by direct reduction of Iron Ore
3 3 73110010 Liquefied Petroleum Gas (L.P.G.) Cylinder
4 4 73259920 Other Cast Articles of Alloy Steel Malleable
5 5 73259930 Other Cast Articles Stainless Steel Malleable
6 6 7410 "Copper Foil (W/N Printed or Backed With Paper, Paper board, Plastics or Similar Backing Materials) of a Thickness (Excl Backing) <=0.15 MM)"
7 7 8201 "Hand Tools like Spades, Shovels, Hoes, Forks, Axes & Similar hewing Tools Secateurs-Any Kind knives, Hedge Shears Etc Used in Agriculture/Forestry"
8 8 820210 Hand Saws
9 9 820310 "Files, Rasps & Similar Tools"
10 10 820320 "Pliers, Pincers, Tweezers & Similar Tools"
11 11 8204 Hand Operated Spanners & Wrenches (Including Torque Meter Wrenches But Not Tap Wrenches); Inter Changeable Spanner Sockets With Or Without Handle
12 12 8205 "Hand Tools (Including Glaziers Diamonds) NES Blow Lamps; Vices, Clamps, Other Than Accessories & Parts of Machine Tools; Anvils; Portable Forges Etc"
13 13 821220 Safety Razor Blades Including Razor Blade / Blanks in Strips
14 14 82121010 Twine Type Shaving System
15 15 821410 "Paper knives, Letter Openers, Erasing knives, pencil sharpeners & Blades Therefor"
16 16 84148011 Gas Compressors of a Kind used in Air Conditioning
17 17 84143000 Compressors used in Refrigerating Equipment
18 18 842620 Tower Cranes
19 19 8447 "Knitting Machines, Stich bonding machines and machines for making gimped yarn, tulle, lace, embroidery, trimmings, braid or net and machines for tufting"
20 20 85119000 Parts of Articles of Heading 8511
21 21 853521 Automatic Circuit Breakers For a Voltage of less than 72.5 KV
22 22 87060031 Chassis for 3-Wheeled Vehicles Heading 8703
TABLE 8 : SPECIAL BONUS BENEFIT @ 1% OF FOB VALUE OF EXPORTS (IN FREE FOREIGN EXCHANGE)
14
Sr. No.
FPS Product Code
ITC (HS) Code Description
23 23 870422 G.V.W. exceeding 20 tonnes : Lorries and Trucks
24 24 8711 Motor cycles (Including Mopeds) and Cycles Fitted with an Auxiliary Motor with or without Side-Cars
25 25 87149100 "Frames, Forks & Parts thereof"
26 26 28030010 Carbon Blacks
27 27 28047020 Phosphorus Red
28 28 28111100 Hydrogen Fluoride (Hydrofluoric Acid)
29 29 28276010 Potassium Iodide
30 30 28391900 Other Sodium Silicates
31 31 29071300 "Octylphenol, nonylphenol and their isomers; salts thereof"
32 32 29071990 Other Monophenols
33 33 29130090 "Other : Halogenated, sulphonated, nitrated or nitrosated derivatives of products of heading 2912"
34 34 29142310 Beta-Ionone
35 35 29147090 "Other: Halogenated, sulphonated, nitrated or nitrosated derivatives "
36 36 29171200 Adipic Acid Its Salts and Esters
37 37 29171990 Other: Acyllic Polycarbodylic acids and their derivatives
38 38 29181520 Sodium Citrate
39 39 29214990 Other : Aromatic polyamines and their derivatives; salts thereof
40 40 29225090 Other : Frusemide Aminodial Domperidone
41 41 29333914 Chlorpheniramine Maleate
42 42 29333990 Other Compounds containing an unfused pyridine ring
43 43 29350090 Other Sulphonamides
44 44 29362920 Nicotinic acid & nicotinamide (Niacinamide/niacine)
45 45 29411040 Cloxacilline & Its Salts
46 46 29414000 Chloramphenicol & Its Derivatives Salts Thereof
47 47 29415000 Erthromycine & Its Derivatives Salts Thereof
48 48 29419030 Ciprofloxacine & Its Salts
49 49 29419090 Other Antibiotics
15
The following products are added in Table 4 of Appendix 37D (Focus Product Scheme) after Sl. No.338 for exports made with effect from 01.04.2011:
Income Tax Notifications
•Person who is entitled to receive any amount on
which TDS is deductible, should also make an
application for PAN. In lieu of this condition, Form
49AA have been introduced for application of PAN,
which will be applicable to LLP, Individuals not being
citizen of India, Companies, Firms, AOP (trusts),
AOP(non-trusts), BOI, Local authority, Artificial
Judicial Person, or any other entity formed or
registered outside India. (notification no. 56/2011
dated 17/10/2011).
•Due date for submission of quarterly Statement of
deduction of TDS to the DGIT have been extended th st th st thfrom 15 July to 31 July, 15 Oct to 31 Oct and 15
stJan to 31 Jan, if the deductor is an office of
Government. Further deductor should also state in
his statement the particulars of amount paid or
credited on which no tax was deducted because of
the deductee furnishing a declaration that tax on his
total income is nil. ( notification no. 57/2011 dated
24/10/2011).
Circulars
•When any amount is deposited in the bank directly
or through the court by the litigant pursuant to the
direction by the court, bank will deduct TDS as per
the existing procedure and the TDS certificate
should be issued by the bank in the name of
“depositor”. When the amount is deposited jointly
by more than one litigant, then TDS certificate
should be issued by the bank to each depositor
according to its respective share in the total
deposit. At the time of making deposit, the
depositor should submit a declaration in the format
prescribed for record purpose and better
administration of TDS. (circular no. 08/2011 dated
14/10/2011)
MVATNotifications / Circular
•Administrative relief in terms of waiver of penalty and
interest imposed on sale made by Handmade soap
manufacturers on turnover of sales of soap except
detergent not exceeding Rs. 20 lakhs can now be
availed by making an application to the assessing st stauthority itself for the period 1 April 2005 to 31 March
2010. (Circular No. 14T of 2011 dated 19/10/2011)
•Due date for submission of Refund application under
section 51 of MVAT Act, 2002 for the period 2009-10 in
Form 501 is now extended from 30.09.2011 to
31.12.2011. (Circular No. 15T of 2011 dated
02/11/2011)
COMPANY LAW:Notifications
•Draft of Companies(Demateria1ization of Certificates)
Rules, 2011 has been withdrawn. [Notification dated
28.10.2011]
•New Form 5 for Notice of consolidation, division, etc. or
increase in share capital or increase in number of
members is prescribed. [Notification dated
23.09.2011]
•In the Companies Regulation, 1956 in regulation 17 for
sub-regulation following regulation is substituted:
the Registrar shall not keep any document pending for approval and registration or for taking on record or for rejection or otherwise for more than Six days, from the date of it filling excluding the cases where approval from the Central Govt. for Regional Director or Company Law Board or Court or any other competent authority is required. [Notification dated 22.09.2011]
Circulars
•Time for furnishing details of PAN by DIN(Director's
Identity Number) Holder is extended upto
15.12.2011.[General Circular No. 66/2011 dated
04.10.2011]
•Online incorporation of companies within 24 hours on
thebasis of certification and declarations given by the
TABLE 4: NEW FOCUS PRODUCTS
Sr. No.
FPS Product
Code
ITC (HS) Code
Description
339 339 29420090 Others – Bulk Drugs / APIs
November - 2011
16
FEMA/RBI
Circular Number Date Of Issue
Department Subject Meant For
RBI/2011-2012/247 4.11.2011 Foreign Exchange Department
Foreign Direct Investment – Transfer of Shares
All Category – I Authorized Dealer banks
A.P.(DIR Series) Circular No. 43
RBI/2011-2012/246 4.11.2011 Urban Banks Department
Interest Rates on Rupee Export Credit - UCBs
The Chief Executive Officer Scheduled Primary (Urban) Co-operative Banks (holding AD Category I licence)
UBD.BPD (AD) Cir.No.3/13.05.000/2011-12
RBI/2011-2012/245 3.11.2011 Department of Banking Operations and Development
Guidelines on Commercial Real Estate (CRE)
All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs)
DBOD.BP.BC.No.
RBI/2011-2012/244 3.11.2011 Foreign Exchange Department
Foreign investment in India by SEBI registered FIIs in other securities
All Category – I Authorized Dealer banks
A.P. (DIR Series)Circular No. 42
RBI/2011-2012/243 2.11.2011 Department of Banking Operations and Development
Comprehensive Guidelines on Derivatives: Modifications
"The Chairman and Managing Directors/ Chief Executive Officers of All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs and LABs), All India Term-Lending & Refinancing Institutions & Primary Dealers"
DBOD.No.BP.BC. 44/21.04.157/2011-12
RBI/2011-2012/242 1.11.2011 Foreign Exchange Department
Memorandum of Instructions governing money changing activities
All Authorised Persons in Foreign Exchange
A.P. (DIR Series)Circular No. 41
RBI/2011-2012/241 1.11.2011 Foreign Exchange Department
Export of Goods and Software – Realisation and Repatriation of export proceeds – Liberalisation
All Category - I Authorised Dealer Banks
A.P.(DIR Series)Circular No. 40
RBI/2011-2012/240 1.11.2011 Foreign Exchange Department
"Deferred Payment Protocols dated April 30, 1981 and December 23, 1985 between Government of India and erstwhile USSR"
All Category - I Authorised Dealer Banks
A.P.(DIR Series)Circular No. 39
RBI Circulars
17
RBI/2011-2012/239 31.10.2011 Department of Banking Operations and Development
Banks' Exposure to Capital Market - Issue of Irrevocable Payment Commitments (IPCs)
All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs)
DBOD.Dir.BC. 43 /13.03.00/2011-12
RBI/2011-2012/238 31.10.2011 Urban Banks Department
Revision in Limits of Housing Loans and Repayment Period - Second Quarter Review of Monetary Policy 2011-12
"The Chief Executive Officer, All Primary (Urban) Co-operative Banks"
UBD.BPD.(PCB). Cir.No.7/09.22.010/2011-12
RBI/2011-2012/237 28.10.2011 Department of Non Banking Supervision
Implementation of Green Initiative of the Government
All Non Banking Financial Companies / Residuary Non Banking Companies
DNBS(PD).CC. No 248/03.10.01 /2011-12
RBI/2011-2012/236 28.10.2011 Department of Non Banking Supervision
"'Know Your Customer' (KYC) Guidelines – Anti Money Laundering Standards (AML) -'Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Obligations of NBFCs in terms of Rules notified thereunder’-Reporting Format under Project FINnet"
All Non Banking Financial Companies / Residuary Non Banking Companies
DNBS(PD).CC. No247/03.10.42 /2011-12
RBI/2011-2012/235 28.10.2011 Department of Non Banking Supervision
List of Terrorist Individuals / Organisations- under UNSCR 1267 (1999) and 1822(2008) on Taliban /AL-Qaida Organisation
All Non Banking Financial Companies /Residuary Non Banking Companies
DNBS(PD).CC. No 246/03.10.42/2011-12
RBI/2011-2012/234 25.10.2011 Foreign Exchange Department
Memorandum of Instructions governing money changing activities- Location of Forex Counters in International Airports in India
All Authorised Persons in Foreign Exchange
A.P. (DIR Series)Circular No.38
RBI/2011-2012/233 25.10.2011 Department of Banking Operations and Development
Deregulation of Savings Bank Deposit Interest Rate - Guidelines
All Scheduled Commercial Banks (Excluding RRBs) )
DBOD.Dir.BC. 42/13.03.00/2011-12
Circular Number Date Of Issue
Department Subject Meant For
18
Circular Number Date Of Issue
Department Subject Meant For
RBI/2011-2012/224 18.10.2011 Rural Planning and Credit Department
Inclusion of Credit under KCC under direct financing for Agriculture
The Chairmen All Regional Rural Banks (RRBs)
RPCD.CO RRB. BC. NO. 24 03.05.33/2011-12
RBI/2011-2012/223 17.10.2011 Rural Planning and Credit Department
"Know Your Customer Norms – Letter issued by Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) containing details of name, address and Aadhaar number"
The Chairmen / CEOs of All State and Central Co-operative Banks
RPCD.CO.RCB.AML.BC.No.23/07.40.00/2011-12
RBI/2011-2012/222 14.10.2011 Department of Banking Operations and Development
"Inclusion in the Second Schedule to the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 – Rabobank International (Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen – Boerenleenbank B.A.)"
All Scheduled Commercial Banks
DBOD. No.Ret. BC. 40/12.06.131/2011-12
RBI/2011-2012/221 14.10.2011 Foreign Exchange Department
Processing and Settlement of Export related receipts facilitated by Online Payment Gateways - Enhancement of the value of transaction
All Category - I Authorised Dealer Banks
A.P. (DIR Series)Circular No.35
RBI/2011-2012/220 14.10.2011 Foreign Exchange Department
Exim Bank's Line of Credit of USD 27.50 million to the Government of the Republic of Senegal
All Category - I Authorised Dealer Banks
A.P. (DIR Series)Circular No.34
RBI/2011-2012/219 13.10.2011 Rural Planning and Credit Department
Inclusion of Credit under KCC under direct financing for Agriculture
The Chairman/Managing Director/ Chief Executive Officer [All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding Regional Rural Banks)]
RPCD.CO.Plan.BC. 22 /04.09.01/2011-12
RBI/2011-2012/218 13.10.2011 Rural Planning and Credit Department
"Know your Customer Norms – Letter issued by Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) containing details of name, address and Aadhaar number"
The Chairmen All Regional Rural Banks (RRBs)
RPCD.CO RRB.AML.BC No. 21/03.05.33(E)/2011-12
RBI/2011-2012/217 13.10.2011 Department of Banking Operations and Development
Prudential Guidelines on Capital Adequacy and Market Discipline - New Capital Adequacy Framework (NCAF) - Revision of Rating Symbols and Definitions of Credit Rating Agencies
The Chairman / CMD / MD / CEO All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding LABs and RRBs)DBOD.No.BP.BC.39/21.0
6.007/2011-12
RBI/2011-2012/216 12.10.2011 Foreign Exchange Department
Memorandum of Instructions governing money changing activities
All Authorised Persons in Foreign Exchange
19
A.P. (DIR Series)Circular No.33
November - 2011
20
Circular Number Date Of Issue
Department Subject Meant For
RBI/2011-2012/215 11.10.2011 Department of Banking Operations and Development
Rupee Export Credit Interest Rates All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs)
DBOD.Dir.(Exp).BC.No.38 /04.02.001/2011-12
RBI/2011-2012/214 10.10.2011 Foreign Exchange Department
Liberalised Remittance Scheme for Resident Individuals-Revised Application cum Declaration form
All Authorised Persons in Foreign Exchange
A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 32
RBI/2011-2012/213 5.10.2011 Department of Payment and Settlement System
Domestic Money Transfer - Relaxations
The Chairman and Managing Director / Chief Executive Officer All Scheduled Commercial Banks including RRBs / Urban Co-operative Banks / State Co-operative Banks / District Central Co-operative Banks/Authorised Card Payment Networks
DPSS.PD.CO.No. 62/02.27.019/2011-2012
RBI/2011-2012/212 4.10.2011 Department of Banking Supervision
Calendar of Reviews for Board/Local Management Committee of foreign banks
The Chief Executives All foreign banks operating in India
DBS.ARS.BC. No. 03 / 08.91.020/ 2011-12
RBI/2011-2012/211 3.10.2011 Foreign Exchange Department
"Appointment of Agents / Franchisees by Authorised Dealer Category-I banks, Authorised Dealer Category-II and Full Fledged Money Changers– Revised guidelines"
All Authorised Persons in Foreign Exchange
A.P. (DIR Series)Circular No. 31
RBI/2011-2012/210 3.10.2011 Department of Payment and Settlement System
List of Terrorist Individuals / Organisations under UNSCR 1267(1999) and 1822(2008) on Taliban / Al-Qaida Organisation
"All Payment System Operators Authorised under the PSS Act, 2007"
DPSS. CO.AD. No. 604 /02.27.005 /2011-12
Service Tax unsettled issues getting settled
services provided by sub-contractor to the contractor is
always the major issue having cost impact.
It is unavoidable but the necessary requirement
for engaging sub-contractor associated with big projects.
There where number of controversies with respect to
applicability of service tax, to the sub-contractor,
entitlement of the exemption to the sub-contractor &
passing of incidence of service tax to get cascading effect
of service tax when services are provided by sub-
contractor through main contractor various projects e.g.
development of infrastructure project like road, airport,
dam, tunnel, EPC contract, services availed by SEZ
developer / Unit etc. etc…
Indore Commissioner ate have issued the Trade
Notice No. 5/98-Service Tax, dated 14-10-1998 when
services of the architect & interior decorators were brought
in the net of service tax.
Board clarified that, in cases where an
architect/interior decorator sub-contracts part/whole of his
work to another architect/interior decorator, it is clarified
that no service tax is required to be paid by the sub-
contractor provided that the principal architect/interior
decorator has paid the service tax on the services
rendered by him to the client and provided the sub-
contracting is in respect of the same service category. In
other words, work is sub-contracted by one architect to
another architect. In such cases, if the principal architect
pays the service tax on services rendered by him to his
client, the sub-contracting architect is not required to pay
the service tax. However, service tax would be required to
be paid in a case where sub-contracting is to a different
service category. For example where an architect sub-
contracts his work to a consulting engineer, then service
tax would be required to be paid by both the architect and
the consulting engineer on the services rendered by them.
Similarly, a market research agency would be required to
pay service tax on services rendered by it to an advertising
agency, even if the advertising agency is also liable to pay
service tax on the amount billed to its client for advertising
services (which, inter alia, includes the amount paid by the
advertising agency for such market research services to
the market research agency).
Board has clarified in the circular no. 96/07/2007
ST dt. 23.08.2007 to the issue by giving the eg. that A
taxable service provider outsources a part of the work by
engaging another service provider, generally known as
sub-contractor. Service tax is paid by the service provider
for the total work. In such cases, whether service tax is
liable to be paid by the service provider known as sub-
contractor who undertakes only part of the whole work &
then Board clarified that A sub-contractor is essentially a
taxable service provider. The fact that services provided by
such sub-contractors are used by the main service provider
for completion of his work does not in any way alter the fact
of provision of taxable service by the sub-contractor.
Services provided by sub-contractors are in the
nature of input services. Service tax is, therefore, leviable
on any taxable services provided, whether or not the
services are provided by a person in his capacity as a sub-
contractor and whether or not such services are used as
input services. The fact that a given taxable service is
intended for use as an input service by another service
provider does not alter the taxability of the service provided.
The plain reading of above clarification indicates
that sub-contractor is essentially a taxable service provider
& nature of service provided through the main contractor
does not alter the taxability of the services provided. In
other words if services provided by the main contractor is
exempted by way of notification then the services provided
by the sub-contractor for the same purpose through main
contractor is also exempted.
…….By Ashok B Nawal
November - 2011
21
Sub-contractor at par with Main Contractor inthe service tax regime
sub-contractor and therefore even the definition provides
“services provided to any person”.
The same ratio is applicable for service provided to
SEZ Developer / Units and even the wording of Rule 31 of
SEZ Rules, 2006 where it has been mentioned that
exemption from payment of service tax of taxable service
under sec 65 of Finance Act 1944 rendered to a Developer /
Unit including Unit under construction by any service
provider shall be available for authorized operation is a
special economic zone. Whereas Rule 10 of SEZ Rules,
2006 provides exemption / drawback and concession on the
goods and the services allowed to a Developer / Co-
developer as the case may be shall also be available to the
contractor including sub-contractor appointed by such
developer / co-developer and all the documents in such
cases shall bare the name of the Developer / Co-developer
along with Contractor and Sub-contractor and this should be
filed jointly in the name of Developer / Co-developer and the
contractor or sub-contractor as the case may be. The spirit
of the Act and Rules read with board circular is clearly
specifying that the service provided for the authorized
operation either by Main Contractor or through sub-
contractor will be exempted or granted refund being
exemption by way of refund.
In case service provided to SEZ Developer / Co-
developer / Unit by Main Contractor or Sub-Contractor is
falling under category 1 and category 2 as specified in
Export of Service Rules, 2005 and then there will be total
exemption and if it falls under category 3 as specified in
Export Of Service Rules, 2005 then exemption is granted by
way of refund. However if there is single Unit of a company
as SEZ the exemption can be claimed by giving FORM A,
otherwise proper documentation needs to be maintained for
claiming refund since the refund is granted only after
payment of service tax by Contractor or sub-contractor and
payment of their respective bills. To conclude, services
provided by sub-contractor for any services which exempt
are also exempted even though these are provided through
main contractor.
Now board has issued one additional circular no st147/16/2011 – ST dated 21 October 2011. Exemption of
service tax has been provided for commercial construction
services / infrastructure development, projects of roads,
airports, dams, tunnels etc and the services provided by
Main Contractor is exempted. The issue was raised
whether the classification of services when are the same of
the Main Contractor and sub-contractor, whether the
exemption provided will be applicable to the sub-
contractor. Board has clarified, though the classification of
the services provided by sub-contractor would be
independently done as per the rules of classification and
the taxability will arise accordingly. However, it is also
apparent that in case the services provided by the sub-
contractors to the main contractor are independently
classifiable under WCS, then they too will get the benefit of
exemption so long as they are in relation to the
infrastructure projects mentioned above. Thus, it may
happen that the main infrastructure projects of execution of
works contract in respect of roads, airports, railways,
transport terminals, bridges tunnels and dams, is sub-
divided into several sub-projects and each such sub-
project is assigned by the main contractor to the various
sub-contractors. In such cases, if the sub-contractors are
providing works contract service to the main contractor for
completion of the main contract, then service tax is
obviously not leviable on the works contract service
provided by such sub-contractor.
Board has been consistent in their views right
from 1998 till 2011 and therefore the spirit of the law maker
is very crystal clear that intension to provide exemption
cannot be defeated just because the services are provided
through the Main Contractor by Sub-Contractor. When the
object is very clear and therefore wherever exemption has
been provided to the taxable service provided irrespective
by Main Contractor or through Sub-contractor, object of
exemption cannot be defeated on the ground that the sub-
contractor is provided the services and there is no
relationship as client between ultimate service availer and
November - 2011
22
CENTRAL EXCISE
•Cenvat Credit – Service of transportation of
employees to the factory is admissible for credit as
input service under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit
Rules, 2004 – Pendency of the appeal by the revenue
in Supreme Court does not bar the High Court to
examine the issue. Appeal dismissed: PUNJAB
AND HARYANA HIGH COURT [2011-TIOL-650-HC-
P&H-ST]
• Cenvat Credit on outward transport from the place of
removal is admissible upto 31.3.2008 in view of the
Karnataka High Court order in case of ABB Ltd. -
Appeal rejected: CHENNAI CESTAT [2011-TIOL-
1380-CESTAT-MAD]
•16(1) and 16(2) in respect of the goods returned by
the customer. Prior permission under rule 16(3) is
not a pre-condition to avail the Cenvat Credit.
[2011(271) E.L.T. 574 (Tri. – Del.)
• Appellant an assessee under Central Excise Act,
1944 and contending that job work alone
undertaken. Revenue arguing that repair and
maintenance undertaken under the guise of job
work. Records not showing how repair and
maintenance charges were received instead of job
work charges. Contract is not available to explain
nature of activity carried out. In the absence of any
such documentary evidence, it cannot be said that
the appellant was undertaking repairs and
maintenance instead of job work. [2011(271) E.L.T.
591 (Tri. - Del.)]
•Interest for lapse of time between delivery of goods
and realization of money is admissible as
deduction to arrive at the assessable value on
An assesse may avail Cenvat Credit under rule
actual interest receivable for each invoice, and not as
average. As the deciding factor is lapse of time in
between the delivery of goods and realization of
money, it is not necessary to show interest separately
in invoice. [2011(271) E.L.T. 563 (Tri. - Del.)]
•An order served on assessee through Speed Post
and not received back is not in accordance with the
provisions of Section 35C of Central Excise Act, 1944
which require communication of order by registered
post with acknowledgment due. In such case there is
no evidence to prove that order was served on
assessee. [2011(271) E.L.T. 518 (P & H)]
•Assessee imported parts of printing machinery duty
free for doing job work on them for their foreign
supplier. Later, due to recession, foreign supplier
stopped job work and asked for return of balance of
imported goods. The assessee made the request for
re-export for balance of goods received by them
which was rejected by the Commissioner of
Customs. Held that re-export of such goods should
be allowed, as neither their import/export was
restricted nor any violation of condition of notification
under which they were imported.[2011(271) E.L.T.
554 (Tri. - Chennai)]
•Other charges collected from customers towards
post-manufacturing expenses such as octroi and
transportation are not to be added to the assessable
value if the assessee has not claimed any separate
deduction on account of such post-manufacturing
expenses. As the assessee has shown the other
charges collected by him on the invoices issued by
him, it cannot be said that there was any suppression
of the facts and hence extended period for issue of
show cause notice is not available to the Revenue.
[2011(271) E.L.T. 553 (Tri. - Ahmd.)]
•Once the Apex Court either clarifies the provisions of
November - 2011
23
claimant was failure of discharge of the duties
according to law and un-necessary driving the
claimant to High Court for relief. Held that the copies
seized to be made available within 7 days and if
failing in providing, the cost of Rs. 50000/- to claimant
to be paid and recovered from the salary of the officer
concerned. [(2011 (272) E.L.T 42 (Bom.)]
•An Appeal, in which the rate of duty of excise or the
value of goods for the purposes of assessment is not
involved, can be heard under Sec 35Cof Central
Excise Act, 1944 by the HC [2011 (272) E.L.T 11
(ALL.)]
•Stricture against the Tribunal for distinguishing
Supreme Court judgment both on the fact and
interpretation of Rule 3. High Court did not find such
distinction. Tribunal not only differed on reasons
given on the same facts but also ventured to
distinguish reasons on question of Law. Tribunal
prima facie committed breach of judicial discipline in
distinguishing Supreme Court judgement applicable
to facts of case by giving own reasons. The
Department counsel called upon to explain how
CESTAT could have taken different view both on
facts and question of Law than taken by Hon'ble
Supreme Court. [2011 (272) E.L.T 11 (ALL.)]
•Transportation cost till buyers stores – Supply of
transformer to state Electricity Boards- Inclusion of
Fright Charges– Contract clearly indicates ex-works
price-Freight charges on Equalized basis mentioned
separately – Merely because Sales Tax paid on
amount inclusive of frights charges, it cannot be
concluded that sale taken place at destination. It is
stated by tribunal that freight charges cannot be
included in assessable value. [2011 (149) E.L.T 11
(Tal. Mum.)]
•Finished goods not entered into Daily Stock Register
was not liable for confiscation & penalty under Rule
25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 in the absence of
intention to clear them without payment of duties.
However, penalty under Rule 27 will be impossible
for procedural lapse of Central Excise provision.
[2011 (272) ELT 315 (Tri. Delhi)]
law or declares any particular principle of Law, it
would apply right from day in respect of which law has
been declared and has been in existence. So, there is
no requirement of further clarification from the board
to clarify the effective date of the applicability of law.
[2011(271) E.L.T. 576 (Tri. - Mumbai)]
•Judgement which has held field for a long time,
should not be unsettled only because another view is
possible. Hardship or inconvenience can nor alter
meaning employed by legislature if such meaning is
clear on face of statute.[2011(271) E.L.T. 492 (S.C.)]
•The parts of machine can be classified as complete
machine if it can be established that parts are
removed as such so as to constitute a complete
machine , such parts have to be assessed to duty as
complete machine and not under the sub heading
relating to parts. [2011 (272) E.L.T. 104 (Tri. Mum)]
•Assessee discharged duty liability on sulphur
bentonite “under protest” in pursuance to order of
commissioner holding the Assessee product as
manufactured product. Consequent to final order of
tribunal holding such activity does not amount to
manufacture, Assessee claim the refund of amount
paid through PLA. [2011 (272) E.L.T 142 (Tri. Bang)]
•Findings of Clandestine Removal are required to be
arrived at on the basis of substantive and positive
evidence reflecting upon such clandestine activates
of the Assessee. The conformation of demand on the
basis of input/output calculation based on electricity
consumption in the factory cannot be upheld. [(2011
(272) E.L.T 94 (Tri. Ahmd)]
•In the case of delayed payment of duty no separate
show cause notice is required to be issued for
recovery of interest. [(2011 (272) E.L.T 136 (Tri.
Mum.)]
•The Managing Director of company is not liable for
penalty unless it is shown that he had , by his
commission or omissions, let goods become liable for
confiscation. [(2011 (272) E.L.T 51 (Ker.)]
•Refusal of revenue officer to provide the copies of
document seized during search & investigation to
24
November - 2011
•Quantification of duty due had to be ascertained on
each removal. Merely because evasion found for
some invoices clearance for other invoices not to be
treated similarly. [2011(272)E.L.T. 225(Tri. - Bang.)]
•In case of non-accountal of goods which are lying in
the factory and non-entry in the statutory record, they
cannot be confiscated without proof of mala fide
intention to clear them without payment of duty. But
penalty under Rule 27 of Central Excise Rules, 2002
can be imposed for procedural lapse of the Central
Excise provision. [2011(272)E.L.T. 315(Tri. - Del.)]
•Assessee paid excess duty of Rs 2,46,240/- in the
month of March 2003. Customer issued debit note in
June 2003 to the assessee for the excess amount of
duty and did not claim refund of excess duty. Books of
account of assessee disclosing that excess was not
paid by customer. Held that assessee was entitled to
refund of excess payment. Refund claim of assessee
could not be rejected on ground that debit note
pertained to month different than in which duty was
paid, or that it was mere adjustment of accounts, and
not proof of payment of duty.[2011(272)E.L.T.
191(Kar.)]
•Cenvat Credit of inputs used in workshop (which is
not the part of Factory) for repairs and maintenance
of capital goods, which is in turn used for manufacture
of final product is allowed. [2011(272)E.L.T. 318 (Tri.
- Bang.)]
CUSTOMS
•Penalty can be imposed on CHA on mis-declaration
and undervaluation of goods exported. [2011 (272)
E.L.T. 58(Tri. Kar)]
•Transaction Value if appears to be lower when
compared to contemporaneous records though the
country of origin is the same. But Bill of entry relied
upon the revenue are not matching with present BOE
either in time or in quantity or in model numbers. Also
Market of electronic items moves very fast on
account of introduction of new models in the field and
•Confiscation of goods classified under different tariff
heading for custom duties will not be allowed
because adoption of correct classification of goods is
in the hand of customs only. Further there is no
intention to evade duties by mis-declaring imported
goods. [2011 (272) ELT 282 Tri. – Del.)]
•Inputs received by the assessee are not those which
were mentioned in the invoice. As a prudent buyer
assessee taken the credit on the basis of invoice &
issue the inputs for manufacturing. The cenvat credit
will be allowed in accordance with circular No.
766/82/2003-CX, dated 15/12/2003. [2011 (272) ELT
280 Tri. - Mumbai)]
•Cenvat credit availed on inputs will not be denied only
because assessee has not maintained records of
inputs utilization in WIP & finished goods as on the
date of crossing SSI exemption limit. Matter
remanded to ascertain quantity of inputs by applying
formula for input & output as per Rule 3 (2) of CCR,
2004 (Eureka Conveyor Beltings Pvt. Ltd. [2011
(272) ELT 285 Tri. – Del.)]
•Section 35C (2A) of Central Excise Act, 1944 the
appeal is required to be heard within 180 days would
also be frivolous as the stay order is not co-terminus
with the period prescribed for disposal of appeal .
Period of Six months laid down therein is not even
mandatory. Department should have been careful in
filling of such frivolous appeals. [2011 (272) ELT 190
P&H)]
•Input Cenvat credit availed on LPG gas used for
canteen in the factory will be allowed & not denied
under Rule 2(k) of CCR, 2004. Canteen facility is
statutory requirement under Factories Act, 1948 &
necessary to run manufacturing activity. [2011 (272)
ELT 308 (Tri. – Mum.)]
•The Cenvat credit on inputs ordered by predecessor
of assessee & received by the assessee will be
allowed though invoice will not be in the name of
assessee. Further no permission from proper officer
will require as it is not a case of transfer of credit lying
in account of predecessor as given in Rule 9 of CCR,
2004. [2011 (272) ELT 288 (Tri. - Mumbai)]
November - 2011
25
carrying out local statutory requirements and other registrations under various laws and statutes such as registration under Service Tax, Custom, Central Excise Act, Export-Import Policy etc. These services do not involve any change or improvement in the management of an organisation and does not require any specialised knowledge of a Management Consultant but these services are only in the nature of compliance with the statutory requirements.: [2011-TIOL-1404-CESTAT-MAD]
•Services availed by the assessee in respect of
Effluent Treatment Plant are admissible input
services, as Effluent Treatment Plant required to be
used in relation to business and without this plant
assessee cannot set up factory. [2011 (24) S.T.R.
(Tri.-Ahmd.)]
•Department should know the meaning of each entry imposing service tax and it cannot be misguiding or taking benefit of the ignorance of an individual who is a small businessman. Department not to take advantage of ignorance of assessee. [2011(24)S.T.R. 84 (Tri.Del.)]
•Duty paid on direction of Revenue Officers and contested later in reply to Show Cause Notice , such payment has to be considered under protest and not on own volition of assessee. Time bar shall not applicable for claiming refund of such payments (Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944). [2011 (24) S.T.R. 110 (Tri.-Mumbai)]
•Refund claim not sanctioned by the Assistant Commissioner, in spite of order of Appellate Tribunal. Assistant Commissioner who was to sanction the refund had been transferred and no substitute had been posted. No submissions were made by the Commissioner or Assistant Commissioner seeking extension of time for implementing the Order of Tribunal or explaining the reasons for non-implementation. The attitude of the Commissioner seems to be one of disobedience and lack of judicial discipline. Therefore, the Commissioner concerned directed to appear in person and explain the reasons for not sanctioning the refund. [2011 (24)S.T.R.121 (Tri.-Ahmd.)]
•The very nature of entry relating to Business Auxillary Service and the large number of disputes that arose regarding the scope of entry clearly shows that there was some confusion in the minds of prospective assessee about the scope of the entry. Sufficient reasons for failure on the part of the assessee to pay tax should exist, to get relief under Section 80 of Finance Act, 1994. Co-operation by the assessee after commencement of enquiry cannot be a sufficient reason to invoke Section 80 of Finance Act, 1994. [2011(24) S.T.R. 65 (Tri.-Del.)]
•Adjudication should take place first and till the
with new technology. Even a gap of 5 to 6 months
considered huge gap. So the enhancement of AV
cannot be justified. Also enhancement of MRP
declared by the appellant's bases upon the
enhanced AV, cannot be upheld. [2011 (272) E.L.T
144 (Tri. Ahmd.)]
•Circular No. 7/2010-Cus. Dated 23-03-2010
clarifying that paragraphs 2.25.1 & 2.25.4 of
Handbook of Procedures were not applicable to
Drawback scheme & it was not payable where
export proceeds had not been realized, found to be
inapplicable as it was not in vogue when transaction
had taken place. [2011 (272) ELT 193 All.]
•Inordinate delay & laches on part of department
disentitle them from taking action against successor
in the interest of Importer. [(2011 (272) ELT 172
Mad.)]
•The refund of Special Additional Duty will be
available even if an assessee sells imported goods
on payment of CST/VAT by raising commercial
invoice and the requirement of disclosure of “no
credit of the additional duty of customs levied under
sub-section (5) of section 3 of the Customs Tariff
Act, 1975 shall be admissible” is not necessary
under condition 2(b) of Notification No. 102/07-Cus
on the commercial invoice but is required while
issu ing invoices under Centra l Exc ise
L a w / C u s t o m s L a w / S e r v i c e T a x
law.[2011(272)E.L.T. 310(Tri. - Mumbai)]
•In view of the Board's Circular No. 643/34/2002-CX,
Erection and Commissioning Charges are not
includible in the assessable value of product even if
the product emerges at the customer's site.
[2011(272)E.L.T. 305(Tri. - Mumbai)]
SERVICE TAX
•Management Consultant Service – Filing of Documents with Statutory Authorities does not change or improvement in the management of an organisation -Not management Service : filing of requisite documents with the Registrar of Companies, and other statutory authorities,
November - 2011
26
•Once Appellant gives the Chartered Accountant's Certificate and shows the amount receivable in the balance sheet, it is necessary for the Revenue to reject these documents/ records. As utility of balance sheet is limited to the fact that balance sheet shows that these amounts as receivable and nothing more and in absence of duty element shown separately in the Central Excise invoice, the certificate issued by the Chartered Accountant certifying that assessee did not collect duty is sufficient.(Unjust enrichment) [2011(24) S.T.R. 108 (Tri.-Ahmed.)
•Tribunal in case of Gandhi & Gandhi Chartered Accountants [2010 (17)S.T.R. 25 (Tri.)] dropped the demand under BAS and held that billing activity is not taxable under BAS and was taxable under BSS, while in the case of Bellary Computers [2007 (8) S.T.R. 470 (Tri.-Bang.)] held that the billing activity was taxable under BAS. Tribunal has given conflicting decisions on same dispute in two different orders. In the present case appellant has made out a strong prima facie case against the demand and penalties therefore, pre-deposit waived and recovery stayed. [ 2011 (24)S.T.R. 92 (Tri.- Bang.)
EOU
•Customs cannot initiate recovery proceedings
against EOU due to failure to fulfill export obligation
without consensus of Development Commissioner. It
is more so where capital goods were not removed
clandestinely & it was case of their non-use. Also
seizure of warehoused goods was not permissible for
failure to fulfill export obligation when goods are not
removed from warehouse. ( 2011 (272) ELT 243 Tri-
Beng.)
SEZ•No custom duty will be levied on supplies from DTA to
SEZ. The reason is that both the units are located within territorial water of India. Custom duties are levied on goods imported into or exported beyond territorial waters of India (2011 (272) ELT 209 A.P.)
INCOME TAX
•Unrealized Export Proceeds for computation of
Benefit under Sec 10A: In absence of requisite
extension for realization of export proceeds from
Reserve Bank of India, the unrealized export
proceeds cannot be considered for the purpose of
computation of benefit under Sec 10A of the Income
Tax Act, 1961. [2011-TIOL-684-ITAT-MUM]
adjudication is made, no coercive steps shall be taken against the members of the petitioner- Association. In case members of the petitioner-association are aggrieved by any kind of adjudication, they can challenge the same before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. [2011 (24) S.T.R. 22 (Del.)]
•Telephone installed at residence of one of the partners and bills paid by the company. Telephone were used for business purpose and Department could not produce any evidence that telephone was not used for business purpose and also could not refute contention of the appellant that Income Tax Department has accepted such expenditure as business expenditure . Therefore it is held that where the input services used is integrally connected with the business of manufacturing the final products and the cost of that input service forms part of the final products then the credit of service tax paid on such input service would be allowable. [2011 (24) S.T.R. 30 (Tri-Mumbai)]
•Insurance Policy for workman's compensation taken for workers who are involved in the manufacturing process of final products to cover the risk therefore. Assessee is entitled for input service credit on service tax paid on such Insurance Policy as per Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. [ 2011 (24)S.T.R. 124 (Tri.-Del)]
•Stipulation of State Electricity Board to plant trees cannot be treated as mandate to undertake landscaping services. Therefore, it has been held that the landscaping services are not input services eligible of availing Cenvat Credit. [2011 (24) S.T.R. 71 (Tri. -Chennai)]
•Commissioner (Appeals) while concluding that payment of tax established set aside the adjudicating authorities findings, that relevant documentary evidence not submitted and directed authority to decide refund claim along with interest. Once requisite conditions fulfilled follows as a matter of law and is a mandate of statute. The fact that the petitioners submitted relevant documents once again at the personal hearing upon remand does not detract from the fact that all the necessary documents were already submitted by the petitioners in the first place before the adjudicating authority much prior to the Order of Remand. Therefore, Petitioner would be entitled to interest as permissible under Section 11BB after the expiry of a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of the application for refund. [2011 (24) S.T.R. 17 (Bom.)]
•If the assessee would have paid service tax during the disputed period and they would have been eligible for the refund in terms of Notification No. 41/2007 dated 06.10.2007. This is a case of revenue neutrality, involving no intention to evade tax. [2011 (24)S.T.R. 40 (Tri-Chennai)]
November - 2011
27
sale of those shares are liable to be assessed as
long term / short term capital gains and not as
business income. [2011-TIOL-663-HC-MUM-
IT]
•Whether maintenance charges towards the
promotion and upkeep of the Mall are liable
to be assessed as 'business income'' or as
income from house property : The
maintenance charges received were towards
the maintenance and promotion of the common
area and the amounts received towards
maintenance charges were business receipts
liable to be assessed under the head "income
from business.' [2011-TIOL-658-HC-MUM-IT]
•Depreciation on Accessories of Computers:
Computer accessories and peripherals such as,
printers, scanners and server, etc. form an
integral part of the computer system and
therefore entitled to depreciation at the higher
rate of 60%. [2011-TIOL-658-ITAT-DEL]
•Additional Depreciation: Assessee has
multiple units in India. Assessee has increased
the capacity in one of the unit and it claimed
additional depreciation on the capacity
enhancement of the said Unit. Additional
depreciation was not claimed on any other units
except for this unit in which there is an increase
in capacity. ITAT ruled that the capacity of the
unit needs to be considered for the purpose of
eligibility of additional depreciation and not of
the business as a whole. [2011-TIOL-656-ITAT-
MUM]
RTI Expenses, administ rat ive d i ff icu l t ies,
deployment of staff, undue hardship and
clogging of administrative set up are no ground
to deny information under RTI which has
statutory recognition and arise out of
fundamental right guaranteed with article 19 (1)
of the Constitution. [2011 (272) E.L.T 18 (Ker.)]
•
•Netting of Export Proceeds: For the purpose
of claiming deduction under Sec 10A, the export
proceeds are required to be realized. However
in case of netting the Export proceeds are
adjusted against the Import payment. ITAT ruled
that netting is allowed for the purpose of
computation of exemption under Sec 10A and
accordingly such exports will be counted for the
purpose of exemption. [2011-TIOL-684-ITAT-
MUM]
•Whether payment of commission and bonus
to Directors will amount to diversion of
Profits: Payments of Commission and Bonus
are reward to given the employee as an
incentive for the good work being done by him /
her. Thus, these expenses were incurred for the
purpose of business expediency and for
improving the working of the assessee.
Therefore it cannot be termed as diversion of
profit of the company. [2011-TIOL-686-ITAT-
DEL]
•Taxability of Income earned during setting-
up business: Whenever an assessee is in the
process of setting up of the business, if any,
income arises under any of the heads except
under the head profits and gains of business,
then such income has to be charged to tax under
that particular head. [2011-TIOL-683-ITAT-
MUM]
•Income related to implementation of project:
Receipts on account of sale tender form for
project and recovery of house accommodation
and furniture & fixture provided with house
accommodation were of capital nature and
therefore can be reduced from the pre-operative
expenses. [2011-TIOL-680-ITAT-INDORE]
•Capital Gains or Business Income: It is open
to an person to trade in the shares and also to
invest in shares and wherever, the shares are
held as investment, then the income arising on
November - 2011
28
•Pakistan grants Most Favoured Nation status to India
•Bail Application of Kanimozhi & other 2G accused dismissed
•Food Inflation rises to 12.21 per cent
•Two Rajasthan income tax officers booked on graft charges last month suspended
•Status Holders Incentive Scrip - Eligible for Exports in 2012-13 also
•IGI Airport Customs seizes 2GB and 4GB memory cards worth Rs 1.12 Crore from 'carrier' coming from Hong Kong; Pax arrested
•Lorreta Mary Vas appointed as Secretary Pharmaceuticals
•RK Mathur is Secretary Micro Medium & Small Enterprises
•CBEC Chairman SD Majumdar retires after Government turns down demand for his extension
•SK Goel appointed as Chairman of CBEC
•Indian exports logs 11% growth in October
•New PAN Forms 49A & 49AA notified with correction
•Draft Circular proposed to be issued in order to streamline the process of sanctioning of refund claims, mainly arising on account of service tax borne on input services that have gone into exports of services in terms of notification no. 5/2006. This draft is being placed in public domain for widest possible circulation and an extensive debate from all stakeholders in trade and industry as also from all the field formations of the department. All suggestions and feedback may please be emailed at [email protected] to Shri Deepankar Aron, Director (Service
th Tax), CBEC (Phone No. 011-23092747 and Fax No. 011-23092275) by 30 November 2011.
In “Anna’s Land”
•CBI arrests Superintendent of Central Excise and an Inspector of South Central Railway in separate bribery cases
•The Supreme Court on 23-9-2011 maintained a six-month jail term and Rs. 500/- fine on a clerk for taking a bribe of Rs. 200 nearly 14 years ago and ruled- There could be no judicial leniency towards people convicted in corruption cases. [Source: The times of India, New Delhi, Dated 24-9-2011].
•Income Tax Officer of Ward No. 19(3)(1) Mumbai & CA arrested by CBI while accepting bribe of Rs 1.5 Lakh-cash of Rs 25 Lakh recovered from the residene of CA
November - 2011
28
29
November - 2011
BMW: Brings Me Women.
FIAT: Failure in Italian Automotive Technology.
FORD: For Only Rough Drivers.
HYUNDAI: Hope You Understand Nothing's Drivable And Inexpensive. ...
VOLVO: Very Odd Looking Vehicular Object.
PORSCHE: Proof Of Rich Spoiled Children Having Everything.
KIA: Kills In Accidents
OPEL: Old People Enjoying Life
TOYOTA: The One You Only Trust, Always.
GOLF/GTI: Girls Only Love Fun / Get Them Inside
HONDA: Hanged Over, Now Driving Away.
November - 2011
Bizsolindia Services Pvt. Ltd. Consultancy & Audit in the area of lDirect & Indirect Taxation,
lFEMA,
lForeign Trade Policy,
lEOU,
lSEZ,lProject Consultancy SEZ, EOU, STPI,
Industrial Parks, Clusters etc.lInternal Audit,lStrategic Management Consultancy.
Bizsolindia Outsourcing Pvt. Ltd. Knowledge Process Outsourcing in the area of
lIndirect Taxation,
lAccounts, lInventory management, lFixed Assets Management.
Bizsolindia IT Services Pvt. Ltd. Specialised IT Consulting and Solutions / modules along with ERP Integration and following ares,
lSpecialized Software for EOUs and SEZs
lExpert in Application programming using Java and ERP Connectivity / Data Migration
lOffers bucket of Add On Products for EXIM related solutions for the complete industry needs
lERP Consulting / Implementation
Bizsol HR services Pvt. Ltd. Strategic Consultancy in the area of HR & Soft skills
Training.
Bhagwati Shipping Pvt. Ltd Custom House Agent (11/548)Custom Clearance of
Export and Import consignments.
A B Nawal & Associates, Cost Practicing Cost Accountant, Cost Audit, Central Excise,
Accountants Adjudication matters upto CESTAT, VAT Audit.
Behede Joshi & Associates, Practicing Chartered Accountants, Statutory Audit & Tax
Chartered Accountants Audit, VAT Audit, Transfer Pricing.
R Venkitachalam, Company Practicing Company Secretary.Secretary.
Bizsolindia provides consultancy in the following areas through associate companies and professional firms of the director,
30
O U R S E R V I C E S
November - 2011
Mr. A B Nawal, MD of Bizsolindia Services Pvt. Ltd. addressing
to the Students & congratulating them for their Sucess.
Mr. A B NAwal, MD of Bizsolindia Services Pvt. Ltd. inaugurating the seminar organised by WIRC, ICWAI, on New Mechanism of
Costing Records & Audit.
Mr. R Venkitachalam, Chairman, Bizsolindia Services Pvt. Ltd. delivering the key note address as Chief Guest at the State Level Seminar on "Application of Psychology in Industry" on 14.10.2011.
Mr. R Venkitachalam, Chairman, Bizsolindia Services Pvt. Ltd. answering questions of participants at the Valedictory function of the State Level Seminar on "Application of Psychology in Industry" on
Mr. R Venkitachalam, Chairman, Bizsolindia Services Pvt. Ltd. inaugurating the workshop "Corporate Lens" conducted by Universal Management School, Nashik on 22.10.2011.