it governance archetypes for allocating decision rights pertemuan ke-7 s/d 10
DESCRIPTION
IT Governance Archetypes for allocating decision rights Pertemuan ke-7 s/d 10. Matakuliah: Pengantar IT Governance Tahun: Feb - 2010. Governance Model Three Major Components. What decisions need to be made? (Domains) Who has decision and/or input rights? (Styles) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
IT Governance Archetypes for allocating decision rights
Pertemuan ke-7 s/d 10
Matakuliah : Pengantar IT GovernanceTahun : Feb - 2010
Bina Nusantara University 3
Governance ModelGovernance ModelThree Major ComponentsThree Major Components
• What decisions need to be made?What decisions need to be made?
(Domains)(Domains)• Who has decision and/or input rights?Who has decision and/or input rights?
(Styles)(Styles)• How are the decisions formed andHow are the decisions formed and
enacted? enacted? (Mechanisms)(Mechanisms)
Bina Nusantara University 4
What Decisions Need to be Made?(Domains)
There are five major decisions domains1. Principles2. Infrastructure strategies3. Architecture4. Business application needs5. Investment and prioritization
Bina Nusantara University 5
Who has Decision & /or Input Rights?(Styles)
1. Business Monarchy2. IT Monarchy3. Feudal4. IT Duopoly5. Federal6. Anarchy
Bina Nusantara University 6
Archetypes
To describe the combinations of people who have either decision rights or input to IT decisions.
Archetypes could describe how your enterprise makes one or more of the five keys IT decisions or
provides input to the decision makers.
Bina Nusantara University 7
IT Governance Archetypes
Bina Nusantara University 8
Key Players in IT Governance Archetypes
Bina Nusantara University 9
Business Monarchy
In a business monarchy, senior business executives make IT decisions affecting the entire enterprise.
Business monarchy rely on input for key decisions from many sources
• A group of, or individual senior managers (SVP; VP; Dean, Chair). Senior IT manager does not act independently.
Bina Nusantara University 10
IT MonarchyIT Professionals make IT decisions.Enterprises implement IT monarchies in many
different ways, often involving IT professionals from both corporate teams and business units.
This group proposes architecture rules to the senior IT management team. The senior IT management team ensures the clarity of the rules and owns the enforcement of architectural standards.
• Individuals or groups of IT senior managers.
Bina Nusantara University 11
Feudal• The feudal model is based on the traditional
model where the business unit make their own decisions, optimizing their local needs.
• The feudal modal was not very common because most enterprises were looking for synergies across business units.
• Unit leaders, key process owners or their delegates.
Bina Nusantara University 12
Federal
• The federal decision making model has a long tradition in government.
• Federal arrangements attempt to balance the responsiblities and accountability of multiple governing bodies.
• Shared by HSC senior management and other College/Unit senior management. May include senior IT management.
Bina Nusantara University 13
IT Duopoly
• IT Duopoly is a two party arrangement where decisions represent a bilateral agreement between IT executives and one other group (business unit).
• IT senior management and one other group, e. g., HSC senior management or College/Unit senior management.
Bina Nusantara University 14
Specifying the decision rights and accountability framework to encourage desirable behavior in the use of IT
Centralized Business Lead
Centralized IT Lead
Six Styles of IT Governance• Business monarchy
– Top Managers• Federal
– Combination of corporate center and SBUs• Feudal
– Each SBU makes independent decisions• IT Duopoly
– IT group and one other group• IT monarchy
– IT specialists• Anarchy
– Isolated individual or small group decision making
Bina Nusantara University 15
Anarchy
Duopoly
Federal
Feudal
ITMonarchy
BusinessMonarchy
IT Investment and Priority
Business Applications
IT Infrastructure
IT Architecture
IT Principles
1
1 1
1
12
2
2
22
3 33
3
3
Bina Nusantara University 16
Anarchy
• Anarchies are the bane of the existence of many IT groups and are expensive to support and secure.
• Individual users or small groups of users.
Bina Nusantara University 17
How the typical enterprise govern IT DomainsDomains PrinciplesPrinciples ArchitectureArchitecture InfrastructureInfrastructure Business Business
ApplicationsApplicationsInvestment & Investment &
PrioritiesPriorities
StylesStyles InpuInputt DecisionDecision InputInput DecisionDecision InputInput DecisionDecision InputInput DecisionDecision InputInput DecisionDecision
Business Business MonarchyMonarchy
00
IT IT MonarchyMonarchy
11
FeudalFeudal
FederalFederal
DuopolyDuopoly
AnarchyAnarchy
00
88331515
00 00
3636
1414
33
1818
2727 00 66 00 77 11 1212 11 3030
7373 59592020 1010 00 88 00 99
00 00 11 22 11 1818 00 33
4466
5599
8811
9933
3030 2727
2727 3030
44 66
1515 3030 2323 1717 66334400 0011 11 00 0033 11
Bina Nusantara University 18
• Typical Governance arrangements for IT Principles
• Typical Governance arrangements for IT Architecture
• Typical Governance arrangements for IT Infrastructure Strategies
• Typical Governance arrangements for IT Business Application Needs.
• Typical Governance arrangements for IT Investment and prioritization.
Bina Nusantara University 19
Analyzing different governance patterns across enterprises
1. Strategic and performance goals2. Organizational structure3. Governance experience4. Size and diversity5. Industry and regional differences
Bina Nusantara University 20
Key IT Governance Decisions
IT Principles DecisionsHigh-level statements about how IT is used in the business
IT ArchitectureDecisions
Organising logic for data,applications, and infrastruc-ture captured in a set ofpolicies, relationships, andtechnical choices to achievedesired business and technical standardisationAnd integration
IT InfrastructureDecisions
Centrally co-ordinated, sharedIT services that provide thefoundation for the enterprise’sIT capability.
Business ApplicationsNeedsSpecifying the business needfor purchasing or internallydeveloped IT applications.
IT Investment andPrioritisation decisions
Decisions about how muchand where to invest in IT,including project approvalsand justification techniques.
Bina Nusantara University 21
The Governance ModelThe “Harmony ‘What-How’ Framework”
StrategyStrategy GovernanceGovernanceArrangementsArrangements
PerformancePerformanceGoalsGoals
DesirableDesirableBehaviorsBehaviors
GovernanceGovernanceMechanismsMechanisms
Metrics &Metrics &AccountabilitiesAccountabilities
HowHow HowHow HowHow
WhatWhat WhatWhat
WhatWhat WhatWhat
Bina Nusantara University 22
The Governance ModelThe “Harmony ‘What-How’ Framework”
StrategyStrategy GovernanceGovernanceArrangementsArrangements
PerformancePerformanceGoalsGoals
DesirableDesirableBehaviorsBehaviors
GovernanceGovernanceMechanismsMechanisms
Metrics &Metrics &AccountabilitiesAccountabilities
HowHow HowHow HowHow
WhatWhat WhatWhat
WhatWhat WhatWhat
Bina Nusantara University 23
Industry & Regional Differences in IT Governance
• Many factors influence governance requirements :– Industry– Region– And so on
• Industry differences :– For profit vs Not-for-profit and Government sectors– Financial services – And so on
Bina Nusantara University 24
• Region differences :– European firms vs Asia-Pacific firms – European firms vs American firms.– And so on
Bina Nusantara University 25
Bina Nusantara University 26
LJMU Federal Governance Model Continuing)
Business Applications Needs
Information Management
Steering GroupBusiness Membership
Development Programme
Business Membership
IT Steering Group
Business Membership
ArchitecturePrinciples
InfrastructureIT
Membership
Investment & prioritisation
MonitoringComplianceReview
Bina Nusantara University 27
LJMU Governance Membership
• 7 members of the LJMU Senior Management team, out of a total of 16
• School Directors• Service Directors – Library, Estates, HR• Admin/project/resource managers• All ICT Senior Managers
Bina Nusantara University 28
What Can Governance Do For You?
• Get buy-in across the board • Do it with them, even if they don’t do it to
themselves• Change behaviour, not just technology
Bina Nusantara University 29
EA & Governance• Executive buy-in to EA approach
– Within LJMU Governance structure, Architecture already identified as responsibility of Information Management Steering Group
• Demonstrate value of EA approach– ‘burning platform’ required, provided by existing
Student Experience Review initiative
• Visibility– Exposes Senior Management to EA approaches
Bina Nusantara University 30
Selling EA & Governance• Speak the language of the business
– Or something as close as you can get• It’s all about value
– The business has to see that this will promote better IS decision-making to support the business better
• Show them pictures– Not like I’ve been doing in this presentation…– EA development will provide the pictures– See JISC SOA animation
http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/programme_eframework/soa.aspx
Bina Nusantara University 31
Selling EA & Governance• Business value:
– Business wants to know how to analyse staffing requirements in light of increasing self-service
– ‘As Is’ Architecture – self-service capability mapped to business processes as of now
– ‘To Be’ Architecture – self-service capability mapped to business processes in light of move to Campus Solutions
• Giving a visual representation that addresses the business problem
Bina Nusantara University 32
So, Governance…
What is it ?Why do you want it?How can you get it?
What will you do with it when you’ve got it?
Bina Nusantara University 33
Quiz