jason jonkmansandy butterfieldneil kelley marshall buhlgunjit birbonnie jonkman pat moriartyalan...
TRANSCRIPT
Jason JonkmanJason Jonkman Sandy ButterfieldSandy Butterfield Neil KelleyNeil Kelley
Marshall BuhlMarshall Buhl Gunjit BirGunjit Bir Bonnie Bonnie JonkmanJonkman
Pat MoriartyPat Moriarty Alan WrightAlan Wright Daniel LairdDaniel Laird
2006 Wind Program Peer Review2006 Wind Program Peer Review
May 10, 2006May 10, 2006
Design CodesDesign Codes
22006 Wind Program Peer Review
Outline of Presentation
Introduction & Background
State of the Art Modeling & Limitations
Program Contributions
Current & Future Work
32006 Wind Program Peer Review
Introduction & BackgroundThe Big Picture
Knowledge AreasWind-Inflow
Waves
Aerodynamics
Aeroacoustics
Hydrodynamics
Elasticity
Controls
Power Generation
Design Standards
wind energy knowledge istransferred to the industry
through design codes
Application AreasConceptual Design
Rotor Performance
Turbine Design
Controller Design
Loads Analysis
Certification
Training
Testing Support
Benchmarking
the advancement of windenergy technology is limited
by design code capability
Design Codes
42006 Wind Program Peer Review
Introduction & BackgroundDesign Loads Analysis
Design requirements are dictated by IEC standards
100s-1000s of design load case (DLC) simulations must be considered
Design Situation DLC Wind Condition
Wave Condition
Directionality Other Conditions
Type of Analysis
Power production 1.x
Power production plus occurrence of fault
2.x
Start up 3.x
Normal shut down 4.x
Emergency shut down 5.x
Parked 6.x
Parked with fault 7.x
Transport, assembly, and maintenance
8.x
Load Case MatrixCritical Locations
52006 Wind Program Peer Review
Introduction & BackgroundModeling Requirements
Fully coupled aero-hydro-servo-elastic interaction
Wind-Inflow:–discrete events–turbulence
Waves:–regular–irregular
Aerodynamics:–induction–rotational augmentation–skewed wake–dynamic stall
Hydrodynamics:–scattering–radiation–hydrostatics
Structural dynamics:–gravity / inertia–elasticity–foundations / moorings
Control system:–yaw, torque, pitch
62006 Wind Program Peer Review
Introduction & BackgroundCoupled Aero-Hydro-Servo-Elastic Simulation
AeroDynTurbSim
HydroDyn
FAST &ADAMS
Wind TurbineAppliedLoads
ExternalConditions
Soil
Hydro-dynamics
Aero-dynamics
Waves &Currents
Wind-InflowPower
GenerationRotor
Dynamics
Substructure Dynamics
Foundation Dynamics
DrivetrainDynamics
Control System
Soil-Struct.Interaction
Nacelle Dynamics
Tower Dynamics
72006 Wind Program Peer Review
State of the Art Modeling & LimitationsWind-Inflow
Current ApproachCurrent Approach LimitationsLimitations
IEC-specified deterministic, discrete gusts/direction changes
IEC-specified turbulence (TurbSim)
Idealistic
Neutral stabilityconditions only
TurbSim includes models for site-specific environments:– flows over flat, homogenous
terrain– flows in/near multi-row wind
farms– flows at the NWTC Test Site
(complex terrain)– flows in the Great Plains
with/without the presence of a low-level jet (LLJ)
Need data between 120m – 230m to validate LLJ model
Need data above 50m within wind farms to validate and expand wind farm models
Need data from avariety of climates
Need offshoredata
De
sig
nD
es
ign
Re
sea
rch
Re
sea
rch
Richardson Number
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2
Da
ma
ge
eq
uiv
ale
nt
loa
d
82006 Wind Program Peer Review
State of the Art Modeling & LimitationsAerodynamics & Aeroacoustics
Current ApproachCurrent Approach LimitationsLimitations
Aerodynamics:– blade-element/momentum– generalized dynamic wake– empirical corrections:
• rotational augmentation• dynamic stall, skewed flow
Aeroacoustics:– advanced empirical models
Post stall and high yaw aerodynamics not well predicted:– rotational augmentation– dynamic stall/unsteady wake coupling
Accurate noise predictions for airfoils, but less so for turbines:– no tower shadow model– inaccurate tip noise model
Aerodynamics:– vortex-wake
methods
– CFD
Aeroacoustics:– nonlinear propagation models
– CAA
Need more experience & expertise with codes
Need aerodynamic wake and pressure distributionmeasurements
Need full windturbine acousticmeasurements
De
sig
n (
De
sig
n (AeroDyn
AeroDyn
))R
es
earc
hR
es
earc
h
92006 Wind Program Peer Review
State of the Art Modeling & LimitationsOffshore Waves & Hydrodynamics (HydroDyn)
Current ApproachCurrent Approach LimitationsLimitations
Diffraction term only valid for slender base
No wave radiation or free surface memory
No added mass-induced coupling between modes
No nonlinear steep / breaking waves
No 2nd order effects:– slow-drift
– sum-frequency
No sea ice loading Need validation data
De
sig
n (
Fix
ed
)D
es
ign
(F
ixe
d)
Re
sea
rch
(F
loa
tin
g)
Re
sea
rch
(F
loa
tin
g)
Regular Wave
Irregular Wave
HydrodynamicLoad (Morison)FInertia + FDrag
Nonlinear WaveSolver
Wave Spectrum
CAddedMass
, CDrag
from Tables and/or Experiment
StructuralDynamics
StructuralDynamics
Freq.-Domain,Potential-Flow
Solver (WAMIT)
Wave Spectrum
PlatformMotions
IFFT to findWave Excitation
FScattering
Hydrodynamic LoadFScattering + FRadiation+ FBuoyancy + FDrag
HydrodynamicLoads
CT to findRadiation
Kernel
PlatformGeometry
102006 Wind Program Peer Review
State of the Art Modeling & LimitationsStructural Dynamics
Current ApproachCurrent Approach LimitationsLimitations
Combined modal/multibody formulation (FAST):– modal:
• blades, tower
– multibody:• platform, nacelle,
generator, hub, tail
Deflection limits Conventional config-
urations only:– no coupled modes
– no flap/twist coupling
– no precurve
– no presweep
Multibody (MSC.ADAMS®) Finite-element method (FEM)
Modeling gearboxdynamics is difficult
Difficult to obtainreduced order modelsfor controls & stabilityanalysis
Computationallyexpensive
De
sig
nD
es
ign
Re
sea
rch
Re
sea
rch
GE 3.6 MW Prototypewith Precurved Blades
1st mode2nd mode
Conventional 3-Bladed Upwind
112006 Wind Program Peer Review
Program ContributionsUsers & Certification
ADAMS FASTUS Academic 7 18US Government 9 10US Industry 15 25International 9 21
Total 40 74
University of MassachusettsUniversity of Massachusetts
122006 Wind Program Peer Review
Program ContributionsSuccess Stories
AOC 15/50
Clipper 2.5MWLiberty
Bergey XL50
SouthwestWindpower
STORMNorthWind 100
GE 1.5MW
132006 Wind Program Peer Review
Program ContributionsDevelopment & Support
Why does the U.S. DOE support codes development?:– design codes are a practical way
for us to transfer wind energy knowledge to the industry
– allows for customization flexibility– commercial products are black
boxes
We support U.S. wind industry through:– websites– technical support– solicitation of user requirements– workshops
NWTC Design Codes Website
142006 Wind Program Peer Review
Current & Future WorkWind-Inflow
Current work:– implemented Great Plains LLJ spectral model– use this spectral model to determine the effect
these jets have on multi-MW LWSTs– document the development of TurbSim
Future plans (next 2 years):– analyze available Lamar LIDAR data to further
validate Great Plains LLJ spectral model– hold a workshop on inflow turbulence issues
and TurbSim training
Future opportunities:– plan field experiment to collect data on
turbulence within large, multi-MW wind farms– form a multi-discipline, synergistic effort to
understand the role of coherent turbulence on turbine drivetrain fatigue
Sample TurbSim Wind Profiles
0
100
200
300
400
500
5 10 15 20
Wind Speed (m/s)
Hei
gh
t A
bo
ve G
rou
nd
Lev
el (
m)
Power law
Diabatic (Log)400m jet
260m jet100m jet
152006 Wind Program Peer Review
Current & Future WorkAerodynamics & Aeroacoustics
Current aerodynamics work:– improved fidelity of unsteady wake model– tower influence
Current aeroacoustics work (reduced scope):– wind tunnel tests (Virginia Tech)– CFD, CAA & propagation codes (Penn State)
Future plans (next 2 years):– rewrite AeroDyn – make modular;
provide hooks for other aerodynamic models– validation using wind tunnel (NASA Ames)
and field measurements– add tower shadow noise model
Future Opportunities:– more wind tunnel and field tests– improve codes:
• aerodynamics – vortex-wake and CFD methods
• aeroacoustics – CAA prediction for tower shadow and tip noise
CFD of Blade Tip Vortex (Uzun et al, 2006)
162006 Wind Program Peer Review
Current & Future WorkOffshore Waves & Hydrodynamics
Current work:– Develop HydroDyn for linear
hydrodynamic loading of fixed-bottom and floating systems
– benchmarking via participation in IEA Annex XXIII OC3
Future plans (next 2 years):– offshore foundations:
• implement p-y & t-z curves
– mooring dynamics:• interface LINES module (MIT)
– support SeaCon studies– WFO analysis of ITI floating
barge concept
Future opportunities:– add nonlinear breaking waves– add sea ice loading– add 2nd order effects– experimental validation
Sample OC3 Simulation Results
20000.0000
25000.0000
30000.0000
35000.0000
40000.0000
45000.0000
50000.0000
55000.0000
60000.0000
65000.0000
70000.0000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60Simulation Time (sec)
NREL FAST TwrBsMyt (kN·m)
GH Bladed TwrBsMyt (kN·m)
Elsam FLEX5 TwrBsMyt (kN·m)
SWE FLEX5 TwrBsMyt (kN·m)
NREL ADAMS TwrBsMyt (kN·m)
DNV HAWC TwrBsMyt (kN·m)
Risoe HAWC TwrBsMyt (kN·m)
Risoe HAWC2 TwrBsMyt (kN·m)
Siemens BHawC TwrBsMyt (kN·m)
172006 Wind Program Peer Review
Current & Future WorkStructural Dynamics
Straight bladeexternal shape
Internalcomposite
materials lay-up
PreComp or
NuMAD(analysis)
Coupledstructuralproperties
BModes(isotropic material)
Coupled modes
Blade: rotorspeed, pitch,precone, etc.
Uncoupledstructuralproperties
Tower:guy wires
Current Work Straight bladeexternal shape
Internalcomposite
materials lay-up
PreComp or
NuMAD(analysis)
Coupledstructuralproperties
BModes(isotropic material)
FAST(uncoupled EoM)
Coupled modes
Blade: rotorspeed, pitch,precone, etc.
Uncoupledstructuralproperties
Tower:guy wires
Future Plans(next 2 years)
Straight bladeexternal shape
Internalcomposite
materials lay-up
PreComp or
NuMAD(analysis)
Design loads
PreComp(inverse design)
Coupledstructuralproperties
BModes(isotropic material)
FAST(uncoupled EoM)
Coupled modes
Blade: rotorspeed, pitch,precone, etc.
Curved bladeexternal shape
Tower:guy wires
BModes(anisotropic material)
FAST(coupled EoM)
FutureOpportunities
182006 Wind Program Peer Review
Current & Future WorkNew Horizons
Gearbox dynamics:– gearbox failures might be the result
of our codes inability to capture theinternal gear & bearing loads properly
Stability analysis:– the potential for instabilities increase
for advanced concepts like flexiblerotors and floating turbines
Tower shadow:– need tower wake measurements and
model updates to support designimprovements of downwind rotors
Code validation:– all models must be validated with experimental data
192006 Wind Program Peer Review