job recovery in times of constrained public finances
DESCRIPTION
Talk given at a joint ILO-UNDP meeting, Geneva, September 2010TRANSCRIPT
Employment friendly macroeconomic frameworksJob recovery in times of constrained public finances
Ekkehard ErnstPrincipal Economist, International Institute for Labour Studies
Overview
• Common crisis
• Divergent recovery
• Tailor-made policies
• Alternatives?
I
Common crisis
The trade crisis has affected everybody in the short run...Correlation of trade flows in OECD countries
Glo
ba
l fin
anc
ial c
risi
s
IT b
ub
ble
cra
sh
Asi
an
an
d R
us
sia
n c
ris
is
Sav
ing
s &
Lo
an
s c
risi
s
Fir
st o
il c
risi
s
Sec
on
d o
il cr
isis
an
d V
olc
ker
sho
ck
5060
7080
9010
0
Tra
de c
orr
elat
ion
(in
%)
1970
m1
1980
m1
1990
m1
2000
m1
2010
m1
Trade weighted unweighted
Global trade collapse
...but in the long-run, investment will follow too...
Deleveraging of households and firms has already started
50
100
150
200
1998q1 2000q3 2003q1 2005q3 2008q1 2010q3 2013q1
(in %
of
GD
P)UnitedKingdom
Euro area
UnitedStates
Fina
ncia
l cris
is
...as long as financial markets remain stressed
Financial stress index in 2009
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
Swed
enTu
rkey
Mal
aysi
aTh
aila
ndCo
lom
bia
Chin
aSr
i Lan
kaFr
ance
Braz
ilSw
itzer
land
Finl
and
Kore
a, R
ep.
Spai
nM
exic
oA
rgen
tina
Peru
Indo
nesi
aCz
ech
Repu
blic
Phili
ppin
esA
ustr
iaJa
pan
Chile
Pola
ndRo
uman
iaIta
lySl
ovak
Rep
ublic
Aus
tral
iaSl
oven
iaEg
ypt
Sout
h A
fric
aRu
ssia
n Fe
dera
tion
Isre
alM
oroc
coBe
lgiu
mD
enm
ark
Cana
daPa
kist
anH
unga
ryIn
dia
Uni
ted
Stat
esG
erm
any
Nor
way
Net
herl
ands
Uni
ted
King
dom
II
Divergent recovery
The sovereign debt crisis has brought divergence...
Variation of government bonds long-term rates in the Euro area (2001-2010)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Jan-
01
Jul-0
1
Jan-
02
Jul-0
2
Jan-
03
Jul-0
3
Jan-
04
Jul-0
4
Jan-
05
Jul-0
5
Jan-
06
Jul-0
6
Jan-
07
Jul-0
7
Jan-
08
Jul-0
8
Jan-
09
Jul-0
9
Jan-
10
Jul-1
0
...and caused global fiscal consolidation
Stimulus vs. consolidation packages
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
Fisc
al b
alan
ce i
n %
of
GD
P
Earlier announced stimulus packages
Announced or implemented consolidation packages
Problems on the labour market become entrenched
Increase in long-term unemployment (2009Q1 to 2010Q1, in %)
-30
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
Lith
uani
aD
enm
ark
Esto
nia
Irel
and
Cypr
usLa
tvia
Uni
ted
Stat
esSp
ain
Nor
way
Finl
and
Swed
enU
nite
d Ki
ngdo
mSl
ovak
iaPo
rtug
alBu
lgar
iaCz
ech
Repu
blic
Slov
enia
Gre
ece
Turk
eyFr
ance
Hun
gary
Ital
yJa
pan
Net
herla
nds
Belg
ium
Pola
ndM
alta
Braz
ilLu
xem
bour
gSo
uth
Afric
aAu
stria
Rom
ania
Ger
man
yM
aced
onia
, FYR
Croa
tia
III
Tailor-made policies
Three main principles
• Policy intervention necessary as long as financial stress is high- Stressed financial market conditions increase fiscal multipliers
- This makes fiscal policy interventions particularly cost-effective
• Use fiscal space where available- Fiscal space also depends on the multiplier
- Especially in emerging economies, these multipliers might be large
- There, even small amounts of fiscal stimulus can make a difference
• Switch to most effective (labour market) policies- Avoid unemployment to become entrenched as much as possible
- Target long-term unemployment more aggressively
- Large expenditure necessary as policies loose effectiveness
Fiscal policies most effective when financial stress is high
-50
51
01
5C
oef
ficie
nt e
stim
ate
Low Intermediate HighFinancial stress tercile
Note: Iterated estimates
Government consumption
20
30
40
50
Co
effic
ien
t est
imat
e
Low HighFinancial stress tercile
Note: Iterated estimates
Public employment
-10
00
10
02
00
30
04
00
Co
effic
ien
t est
imat
e
Low Intermediate HighFinancial stress tercile
Note: Iterated estimates
Direct job creation
-50
05
01
00
Co
effic
ien
t est
imat
e
Low Intermediate HighFinancial stress tercile
Note: Iterated estimates
Unemployment benefits
Policy effectiveness in job creation, at different levels of financial stress
Fiscal stimulus can have a strong impact, especially in emerging economies...
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
Em
ploy
me
nt m
ulti
plie
rs
Isre
al
Sw
itze
rland
Un
ited
Sta
tes
Ca
nada
Jap
an
Slo
ven
ia
Un
ited
Kin
gdom
Fra
nce
Aus
tral
ia
Italy
De
nma
rk
Ge
rman
y
Bel
gium
Short-term multiplier Long-term multiplier
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
Em
ploy
me
nt m
ulti
plie
rs
Arg
ent
ina
Ken
ya
Sou
th A
fric
a
Mex
ico
Bot
swa
na
Bra
zil
Sau
di A
rabi
a
Alg
eria
Tu
rkey
Egy
pt
Ch
ina
Short-term multiplier Long-term multiplier
...but effects change depending on the instrument used
17.1
3.9
15.0
3.4
1.4 1.2
05
10
15
20
Con
trib
utio
ns (
in %
)
Governmentspending
Government non-wage spending
Government wagespending
Policy contributions to outflows (short- vs. long-term)
Short-term effecton outflows
Long-term effecton outflows
39.2
5.3
25.7
4.0
15.7
3.5
15.6
3.5
7.5
2.8
01
02
03
04
0C
ontr
ibut
ions
(in
%)
Unemploymentbenefits
Hiringincentives
Trainingexpenditures
Public employmentservices
Direct jobcreation
Labour market spending: Contributions to job creation (short- vs. long-term)
Short-term effecton outflows
Long-term effecton outflows
IV
Alternatives?
Additional spending could be a win-win option
Exit scenarios from the crisis in advanced G20 countries
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
Panel A - Government deficit
Baseline scenario Global fiscal consolidation Additional stimulus
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
Panel B - Employment growth
Baseline scenario Global fiscal consolidation Additional stimulus