jose luis ugas gil, a078 903 173 (bia aug. 14, 2013)

7/27/2019 Jose Luis Ugas Gil, A078 903 173 (BIA Aug. 14, 2013)

1/23

UGAS GIL, JOSE LUISPO BOX 65215SALT LAKE CIY, U 84165

Name: UGAS GIL JOSE LUIS

m of

Executive Oce r Immgration Revew

Boad ofImmigation AppealsOce ofthe Clek57 Leesbug Pike, Sute 2Fs Chuch l'gmi 22./

HS/ICE Oice of Chief Counsel - SC2975 Decker Lake Dr. Stop CWest Valley Cty UT 84119

A 078-903-173

Date of ths notice: 8/4/2013

Enclosed s a copy of the Board's decson and order n he above-rerenced case.

Enclosre

Mb:Ply Rg

Sncerely,

D cDonna Carr

Che Clerk

hk:

Cite as: Jose Luis Ugas Gil, A078 903 173 (BIA Aug. 14, 2013)


2/23

US Depaent of JutceExecutive Oe r Imation Revew

Fas Crh, Vrgna

File: A078 903 173 - Sat Lae Cit, UT

In re JOSE LUIS UGAS GI

N MOVA PROCEEDNGS

APPEA

ON BEHALF OF SPONDENT Pro se

ON BEHALF OF DHS Kain Ivany

Deision of the Board ofaion Appeals

Date

U 14 203

Assistant Chef Cousel

CHRGE

Notice Sec. 22(a)(2)(A)(i)(I), &N Act[8 U.S.C. 82(a)(2)(A)(i)(I)] Cie involving moal uide

Sec. 22(a)(6)(A)(i), &N Act 8 U.S.C. 82(a)(6)(A)(i) Present without being admitted or paoled

APPLCATION Adjustment of status

The espondent appeas the Iigration Judge's August 24, 202, decision denyinghis

application r adjusent of staus ude section 245(a) of the migtion and Nationaity Act,8 U.SC. 1255(a). The appeal will be dismissed.

The onl issue in ths appeal is weter the mmigation Judge ered in nding therespondent ineligible adjusment of stats under section 245(a) of the Act bed on isinadmissibili due to his two convictions r crimes involving moral tupitude (J at 34).On appeal, te respondent contends tat his 1993 the conviction in violation of Caliia PenalCode section 84(a), to whic he ped nolo contendere, is not a "conviction as den bysection 0(a)(8) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 0(a)(48), because it was pocessed as an inactionand, a esult, he was not povided with the ight to a ju ta o appointed cousel. According to the respondent, the lack of these due process potections emoves his oense om

the purview of section 0 I (a)( 48) of the Act.

otwithstanding the reondents contentions on aeal, e nd no reaon to distr theImiation Judges conclsion that his 1993 conviction is a conviction r immigrationoses (IJ. at 112). See 8 CF.R 1003.(d)(3)(ii) (2013) (de novo review) As und bythe Imigation Judge, the respondent case is goveed by the Boards recent decision inMatter of Cuelar-Gomez 25 &N Dec 850 (BIA 2012) (.J at ). n Matter o/uear-Gomezwe concluded that a rmal judgent of gilt of aien enteed b a municipa cou is a

We rel on the men aised in the respondents Notice of Appeal and 1page statemente respondent did not le a ll bief in support of his appeal.



3/23

A08 903 173

convtion ndr ction 101a)48)A) of th Act if th pocding in which th jdntwa ntrd wr gnuin criina procding ee i; see also Maer of Rivera-Valencia4 & Dc 484 BA 008); Maer of Esamizar 3 I& Dc 684 BIA 004)

A nd by th Immigration Jdg, h rpondnt 993 pa to an "inaction,,

i aconviction ndr ction 101a)48) of th Act inamch a it rquir a nding of guit byond araonab doubt d aord th rpondnt gratr right upon appa J at 914) eeCaiia Pna Cod ction 197 People v. Prince CaApp3d pp 9, 333 1976)Maer of CuelarGomez supra at 84 Likwi, in Maer of CuellarGomez w coniddth rgmnt raid by th rpondnt rgading hi contntion hat hi procding wrnot gnn criina procding bca h wa not aodd appointd con and a jry eei Undr th circtanc th Imigration Judg dciion nding th rpondntinigib r adjutnt of tatu du to hi inadmiibiity i pportd by h rcod IJ at I 4)Th rpondnt did not appy r a waivr of hi inadiibiity undr ction I h) of th Act,8 UC 8h) J at 7)

inay, th rpondnt ha ubmid vidnc that h d th rqird vont dprbond bt did not within th day ti iit t by th Immiation Jdg IJ at 1) eeMaer of Gamero 4 & Dc 4 BA 00) Dpnt of Homand crity "DH)ar that th vonty dpa piod cnot b rintatd ee i Howvr, th DHaccptd h rpondnt bond r, w wi rintat h vouty dp piod

Accodingy, th appa wi b diid

ORR Th appa i dimid

URTHR ORDR Prat to th mmigraion Judg ordr nd conditiond pon

copic with condition t h by th Imigraon Jdg and h tatut, th pondnt ipmitd to vountaiy dpa th Unitd at, without xpn to h Govnt, wihin60 day om th dat of thi odr o y xtnion byond that ti ay b td by thDprtnt of Homand cuity "DH) ee ction 40Bb) of th Iigation dationaiy Act, 8 UC 9cb) see also 8 CR 406c) In th vnt thrpondnt f to vontariy dpat th Unitd tat, th rpondnt ha b rovd aprovidd in h Immiation Judg ord

OTICE If th rpondnt i to vounty dpart h Unitd tat within th timpriod pcid, or y xtnion gtd by th DH, th rpondnt ha b bjct to a civipnaty a povidd by th rguation d th taut and ha b inigib r a priod of

10 y r any thr rif nd ction 40 d ction 40A, 4, 48, and 49 of thAct ee ction 40Bd) of h Act

WARNG f t rpondnt a motion to ropn o rconidr pior to h xpiration ofh vount dparr priod t h abov t grant of vontay dpartr i autoaticaytinatd; t priod aowd r vonary dpu i not tayd, tod, o xtndd If thant of vount dpatur i atoaticay tinatd upon h ing of a otion, th pnatir fair to dp undr ction 40Bd) of th Act ha not appy ee 8 CR 406) )



4/23

J

A078 903 73

WARIG: I prior o dparin h Unid Sas h rspondn ls any udicialchan o his aminisaivly nal ordr such as a piion r rvi pursu o scion242 of h Ac 8 US.C 252 h ran of volunary dparr is auomaicay inad andh aa ordr o rmoval shall immdialy a c ovr if h rspondn ls apiion r rvi d hn dpas h Unid Sas hin 30 days of such in hrspondn ll no b dmd o hav dpard undr an ordr of rmoval if h alin providso h DS such vidnc of his or hr dparur ha h Immiaion d Cusoms nforcmnild Oc Dircor of h DS may rquir and provids vidnc DS dms sucn hah or sh has rmaind ousid of h Unid Sas Th pnalis r faiur o dpar undrscion 240Bd) of h c sha no apply o ain ho s a piion r rvinoihsandin any priod of im ha h or sh rmains in h Unid Sas hi h piionr rvi is pndin. ee 8 C..R. 240.26i)

jose luis ugas gil, a078 903 173 (bia aug. 14, 2013)

Documents