julie lefever - department of mineral resources · to the plant kingdom as fossil algae,...

5
Julie LeFever Introducon The study of fossilized tracks, trails, tubes and burrows associated with organisms that burrow into and live in, or near the boom deposits of an ocean is called Ichnology. First studies of trace fossils date from 1823 to 1881 when they were originally assigned to the plant kingdom as fossil algae, “fucoids” (Osgood, 1975). During those early examinaons, the gross morphology of the “fucoids” was thought to resemble plants thus supporng the assignment. In 1880, evaluaon of previous work raised quesons of validity. Many “fucoids” were determined to be traces of invertebrate acvity and others were sedimentary structures. Discussions connued to 1927, when “fucoids” were disproved and the study of trace fossils all but ceased. Lile progress was made in the study of trace fossils from 1927 to 1960. Three reasons are cited for this lack of progress: 1) problems related to taxonomy (the classificaon of organisms), 2) there was no statement as to the value of trace fossil studies to paleontology, zoology, and sedimentology, and 3) there was limited interest by sedimentologists and paleontologists in paleoecology (the interacon between ancient organisms and their environment) and the use of trace fossils to help determine past environments. Since that me a classificaon of trace fossils has been developed using sedimentological and behavior methods. Trace fossils have proven useful in many aspects of geology including facies analysis, animal behavior, and morphology. This paper is intended to be an introducon to trace fossils, not an extensive report with all the details. Trace Fossils versus Body Fossils Trace fossils represent behavior or acvity by organisms rather than the actual body parts of the organism itself (Frey, 1975). Trace fossils (“facies fossils”) are significantly different from body fossils in that they extend over longer periods of me and have more restricted geographical distribuon. Parcular assemblages of trace fossils reflect parcular environments of deposion thus making them very useful for environmental reconstrucon and extending those environments to strata of significantly different ages. The traces are not necessarily formed penecontemporaneously with sedimentaon, their presence indicang the sediment had become more stable allowing for mobile feeders. The abundance of different types of trace fossils appears to be linked with energy condions at the me of sedimentaon (larger diversity is associated with quieter waters). Body fossils comprise the primary record of ancient life. Trace fossils record the expression of that life. Soſt-bodied organisms are primarily represented by traces. Traces include: 1) Tracks — impressions leſt by a moving individual’s appendage (walking or running); 2) Trails — connuous groove produced during locomoon (sliding or slithering); 3) Burrows — more or less permanent structures excavated within the sediment; and, 4) Bioerosion structures organisms mechanically or biochemically boring into a rigid substrate (Angulo and Buatois, 2009). There is a great deal of difficulty in relang the traces back to the trace maker. The trace maker is rarely, if ever, found in or near the trace. Understanding is gained by interpreng the behavior that led to the formaon of the trace, was it resng, crawling, grazing, feeding, dwelling, or escaping. These behavioral responses may also be related to environmental changes in salinity, oxygenaon, temperature and water turbidity (Gingras et al. 2009). Features that indicate the environmental changes listed above include: 1) Unburrowed – indicator of fresh water 2) Distribuon of the types of traces 3) Size of the trace – for example, the size of the trace in a marine environment would be an indicator of oxygen content and food supplies; small traces might indicate a stress environment; and high diversity would result from abundant food, oxygen, and normal salinies. This leads to a simple, praccal classificaon based on the morphology of their trace (fig. 1). There is not a direct correlaon between ichnofacies and deposional environments; instead they represent a set of environmental factors (Angulo and Buatois, 2009). These can be split into 4 main categories (fig.2): 1) Soſtground marine - Psilonichus, Skolithos, Cruziana, Zoophycos, Nereies 2) Substrate-controlled – Glossifungites, Trypanites, Teredollites 3) Connental invertebrate 4) Vertebrate Subsurface studies in the Williston Basin focus on the top two categories, the soſtground marine and the substrate controlled. These are the traces that are encountered when working with cores from the basin (fig. 3). 6 GEO NEWS

Upload: vunhi

Post on 17-Sep-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Julie LeFeverIntroductionThestudyoffossilizedtracks,trails,tubesandburrowsassociatedwithorganismsthatburrowintoandlivein,ornearthebottomdeposits of an ocean is called Ichnology. First studies of tracefossilsdatefrom1823to1881whentheywereoriginallyassignedto the plant kingdom as fossil algae, “fucoids” (Osgood, 1975).During those early examinations, the gross morphology of the“fucoids” was thought to resemble plants thus supporting theassignment.In1880,evaluationofpreviousworkraisedquestionsof validity. Many “fucoids” were determined to be traces ofinvertebrate activity and others were sedimentary structures.Discussions continued to 1927,when “fucoids”weredisprovedandthestudyoftracefossilsallbutceased.Littleprogresswasmade in the study of trace fossils from 1927 to 1960. Threereasons are cited for this lack of progress: 1) problems relatedto taxonomy (the classification of organisms), 2) there was nostatementastothevalueoftracefossilstudiestopaleontology,zoology, and sedimentology, and 3) there was limited interestby sedimentologists and paleontologists in paleoecology (theinteraction between ancient organisms and their environment)andtheuseoftracefossilstohelpdeterminepastenvironments.Sincethattimeaclassificationoftracefossilshasbeendevelopedusingsedimentologicalandbehaviormethods.Tracefossilshaveprovenusefulinmanyaspectsofgeologyincludingfaciesanalysis,animalbehavior,andmorphology.Thispaperisintendedtobeanintroductiontotracefossils,notanextensivereportwithallthedetails.

Trace Fossils versus Body FossilsTrace fossils represent behavior or activity by organisms ratherthan the actual body parts of the organism itself (Frey, 1975).Trace fossils (“facies fossils”) are significantly different frombody fossils in that they extend over longer periods of timeand have more restricted geographical distribution. Particularassemblages of trace fossils reflect particular environments ofdeposition thus making them very useful for environmentalreconstruction and extending those environments to strata ofsignificantlydifferentages.Thetracesarenotnecessarilyformedpenecontemporaneously with sedimentation, their presenceindicating the sediment had become more stable allowing formobile feeders. The abundance of different types of tracefossilsappearstobelinkedwithenergyconditionsatthetimeofsedimentation(largerdiversityisassociatedwithquieterwaters).

Body fossils comprise theprimary recordof ancient life. Tracefossilsrecordtheexpressionofthat life. Soft-bodiedorganisms areprimarilyrepresentedbytraces.Tracesinclude:

1) Tracks—impressionsleftbyamovingindividual’sappendage(walkingorrunning);

2) Trails — continuous groove produced during locomotion(slidingorslithering);

3) Burrows —more or less permanent structures excavatedwithinthesediment;and,

4) Bioerosion structures — organisms mechanically orbiochemically boring into a rigid substrate (Angulo andBuatois,2009).

Thereisagreatdealofdifficultyinrelatingthetracesbacktothetracemaker.Thetracemakerisrarely,ifever,foundinornearthetrace.Understandingisgainedbyinterpretingthebehaviorthatledtotheformationofthetrace,wasitresting,crawling,grazing,feeding,dwelling,orescaping.Thesebehavioralresponsesmayalsoberelatedtoenvironmentalchangesinsalinity,oxygenation,temperatureandwaterturbidity(Gingrasetal.2009).Featuresthatindicatetheenvironmentalchangeslistedaboveinclude:

1) Unburrowed–indicatoroffreshwater2) Distributionofthetypesoftraces3) Size of the trace – for example, the size of the trace in a

marineenvironmentwouldbeanindicatorofoxygencontentand food supplies; small traces might indicate a stressenvironment;andhighdiversitywouldresultfromabundantfood,oxygen,andnormalsalinities.

This leads to a simple, practical classification based on themorphologyoftheirtrace(fig.1).Thereisnotadirectcorrelationbetweenichnofaciesanddepositionalenvironments;insteadtheyrepresent a set of environmental factors (Angulo and Buatois,2009).Thesecanbesplitinto4maincategories(fig.2):

1) Softgroundmarine-Psilonichus,Skolithos,Cruziana,Zoophycos,Nereities

2) Substrate-controlled–Glossifungites,Trypanites,Teredollites3) Continentalinvertebrate4) Vertebrate

Subsurface studies in theWilliston Basin focus on the top twocategories, thesoftgroundmarineandthesubstratecontrolled.These are the traces that are encounteredwhenworkingwithcoresfromthebasin(fig.3).

6 GEO NEWS

Figure 2. Ichnofaunamodel of the soft-ground and substratecontrolled trace fossilassemblages and how they relate to marine environment. Each iscomprised of a seriesof traces that reflectenvironmental factorswhich, in associationwith sedimentary and hard body fossils, as-sist in the determina-tion of the sedimen-tary environment.Diagram from AnguloandBuatois(2011).

Figure 1.Threedimensionaldiagramdisplayingmorphologicalclassifi-cationofburrowsandtheirassociatednames(fromGingrasetal.2009)

Ichnofabric AnalysisIchnofaciesanalysisstartsbydeterminingthediscreteandthepoorlydefinedtracesincross-sectionview.Emphasisisplacedoncross-cuttingrelationships.Thisviewallowsfortiering,wherethereisaverticalpartitioningofthehabitatduetochangesinthe environment including physical, chemical, and biological

parameters(AnguloandBuatois,2009).Therearethreefactorsthat are the most important in controlling tiering. The firstchangestheconsistencyofthesedimentbycompactionduetovertical accretion and progressive burial and dewatering. Thesecondreliesontheabundanceoforganicmatter.Thegreatestamount of organic matter is at the sediment-water interface.Thenumberoforganismspresentcanbedirectlyrelatedtotheabundanceoffood.Thenumberoffeedersdecreasesawayfromthefoodsource.Thethirdfactorshowsasimilartrendregardingthe oxygen content of the sediment. Sorting all of the tracefossils intoatieringstructurecanbedifficultespecially inareasofintensebioturbation.

Toassistintheanalysisoftracefossils,thedegreeofbioturbationis assigned a number (bioturbation index) that represents thepercentofthesedimentthatisdisturbed(table1,fig.4).Thiscanbeplottedvisuallyalongsidethetieringdiagramandotherpartsof the analysis to aid in the determination of the sedimentaryenvironments(fig.5).

Acollectionoftheinformationcanthenbeusedtodeterminethesedimentaryenvironment.Gingrasetal.(2009)developedaflowchart(fig.6)thataidsintheinterpretationofcommonbioturbatetextures.

JULY 2016 7

C.

Figure 4. ExamplesofvariationsinBioturbationIndexwithintheMiddleMemberoftheBakkenFormationinNorthDakota.AandCarefromtheWhitingOilandGasCorp.–Braaflat#11-11H(NWNWSec.11,T153N,R91W;API#33-061-00641-0000;depths–9,881ftand9,901ft).ThecoresamplethatisshowninBisfromtheEOGResources,Inc.–Fertile#1-12H(SESESec.12,T151N,R90W;API#33-061-00557-0000;depth–9,382ft).CoresampleAhaslimitedburrowingwithlaminationsthatarevirtuallyundisturbed.CoresampleBismoderatelybioturbatedwhilestillretainingsomeoftheoriginallaminations.CoresampleCisextensivelybioturbated.Allofthesedimenthasbeendisplacedbytheburrows.Scalebarinwhiteisoneinch.

A. B.

B.I.-0-1

B.I.3

B.I.5

Figure 3. Example of Thalassinoides burrowsfromtheOrdovicianRedRiverFormationfromtheTerraResources,Inc.–BNRR#1-17(NWSWSec. 17, T145N., R103W; API: 33-053-00955-0000;depth12,963.1ft)wellwithandiagram-matic3Drepresentationoftheboxworkoftheburrows.Preferentialdolomitizationofthebur-rowovertherockmatrixcausestheburrowstostandout.Italsocomprisesthereservoirfortheformation. DiagramfromGerardandBromley(2008).

8 GEO NEWS

Figure 5. Example of a core log fromBakken well 15-31-03-11W2 showing theresultofapplyingtheichnofabricapproach.Illustration on the left represents thedescribed coredisplaying theburrowsandsedimentarystructures.Thisisfollowedbytheage,nomenclature,depth,bioturbationindex,andultimatelythesedimentaryfaciesand environments. Diagram from AnguloandBuatois,2012.

Table 1. Criteria for the determination oftheBioturbationIndex.SeeFigure4forthevisualdisplayofthistypeofdata.

JULY 2016 9

Figure 6. FlowchartdevelopedbyGingrasetal.(2009)demonstratingtheprocessofinterpretingichnologicalfabrics.

ConclusionsTrace fossils are an additional tool that assists the geologist indetermining the environment of deposition. Multiple factorscontribute to theabsenceorabundanceof trace fossils in therocks. Attention to detail, in addition with hard body fossilsand sedimentary structures, add to our knowledge of pastenvironments.

References CitedAngulo, S., and Buatois, L., 2009, Environmental setting of the Upper

Devonian-Lower Mississippian Bakken Formation of SubsurfaceSaskatchewan: IntegratingSedimentologicand Ichnologicdata,ACoreWorkshop:in,17thWillistonBasinPetroleumConferenceandProspectExpoCoreWorkshop:Regina,SK,p.66-163.

Angulo, S., and Buatois, L., 2012, Ichnology of a Late Devonian-EarlyCarboniferous low-energy seaway: The Bakken Formation ofsubsurface Saskatchewan, Canada: Assessing paleoenvironmentalcontrols and biotic responses: Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology,Paleoecology,v.315-316,p.46-60.

Buatois,L.A.,andMángano,M.G.,2011,Ichnology–Organism-substrateinteractionsinspaceandtime:CambridgeUniversityPress,358p.

Frey,R.W.,1975,Realmof Ichnology, in, Frey,R.W.,ed., TheStudyofTraceFossils:ASynthesisofPrinciples,Problems,andProceduresinIchnology:NewYork,Springer-Verlag,p.13-38.

Gerard,J.R.F.andBromley,R.G.,2008,Ichnofabricsinclasticsediments:Applicationstosedimentologicalcorestudies:Madrid,J.R.F.GerardPublishing,97p.

Gingras,M.K.,Bann,K.L.,MacEachern,J.A.,Waldron,J.,andPemberton,S. George, 2009, A Conceptual Framework for the Application ofTrace Fossils: in,MacEachern, J.A., Bann, K.L., Gingras,M.K., andPemberton,S.George,eds,AppliedIchnology:SEPMShortCourseNo.52.,p.1-26.

Osgood,R.G.,Jr.,1975,TheHistoryof InvertebrateIchnology, in,Frey,R.W., ed., The Study of Trace Fossils: A Synthesis of Principles,Problems,andProceduresinIchnology:NewYork,Springer-Verlag,p.3-10.

10 GEO NEWS