juvenile survival, travel time and the in-river environment presenter: steve haeseker css annual...

43
Juvenile survival, travel time and the in- river environment Presenter: Steve Haeseker CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010

Upload: dominic-hutchinson

Post on 03-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Juvenile survival, travel time and the in-river environmentPresenter: Steve Haeseker

    CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2nd 2010

  • Objectives:Develop models that explain variation in migration time and survival through the hydrosystem

    Measure and monitor juvenile Chinook and steelhead migration time and survival through the hydrosystemExamine associations between environmental factors and migration time and survival

  • Monitoring methods:Two reaches: LGR-MCN (CHW, CHH, STH&W) MCN-BON (CHH&W, STH&W)Weekly release cohorts of PIT-tagged fishEstimated median fish travel time (FTT) and survival rate

  • Environmental and Management Factors: Seasonality (Julian Day) Temperature Turbidity Average percent spill Water travel time (WTT, days)

  • Water Transit Time (WTT)Estimate of the number of days required for average water particle to transit a reservoir3 days2.5 days2.5 days8 days

  • 98020499 0705 06000103Yearling Chinook median travel times

  • 98020499 0705 06000103Yearling Chinook median travel times

  • Yearling Chinook median travel timesEnvironmental and management factors: WTT, percent spill, Julian day98020499 0705 0600010394%88%

  • Steelhead median travel times98020499 070506000103

  • Steelhead median travel times98020499 070506000103

  • Steelhead median travel timesEnvironmental and management factors: WTT, percent spill, Julian day98020499 07050600010390%89%

  • Mid-late AprilEarly MayLate MayPercent SpillWater Transit Time (days)yearling Chinook travel time (days)

  • Early MayLate MayPercent SpillWater Transit Time (days)Mid-late Aprilyearling Chinook travel time (days)

  • Early MayMid-late MayPercent SpillWater Transit Time (days)Mid-late Aprilyearling Chinook travel time (days)

  • Early MayMid-late MayPercent SpillMid-late AprilWater Transit Time (days)steelhead travel time (days)

  • Early MayMid-late MayPercent SpillMid-late AprilWater Transit Time (days)steelhead travel time (days)

  • Early MayMid-late MayPercent SpillMid-late AprilWater Transit Time (days)steelhead travel time (days)

  • Early MayMid-late MayPercent SpillWater Transit Time (days)Mid-late AprilPercent SpillChinooksteelhead

  • Early MayMid-late MayPercent SpillUnimpounded travel time = 5 to 9 days (Raymond 1979)Mid-late AprilPercent SpillChinooksteelhead

  • Mortality approach to survivalMortality = 1 - SurvivalIf daily survival is 0.98, then daily mortality is 0.02 (2%)SurvivalMigration time (days)90%61%37%If we can predict migration time and daily mortality, then we can predict survival

  • yearling Chinook mortality rates98020499 070506000103LGR-MCNMCN-BON

  • yearling Chinook mortality rates98020499 070506000103LGR-MCNMCN-BON

  • yearling Chinook mortality ratesLGR-MCNMCN-BONFactors: WTT, Julian dayFactors: Julian day98020499 07050600010325%45%

  • LGR-MCNMCN-BONsteelhead mortality rates 98020499 070506000103

  • LGR-MCNMCN-BONsteelhead mortality rates 98020499 070506000103

  • LGR-MCNMCN-BONFactors: WTT, Julian day, spillFactors: temperaturesteelhead mortality rates 98020499 07050600010354%51%

  • Mid-late AprilMid-late MayEarly Mayyearling Chinook daily mortalityWater Transit Time (days)

  • Early MayMid-late MayPercent SpillWater Transit Time (days)Mid-late Aprilsteelhead daily mortality

  • Early MayMid-late MayPercent SpillWater Transit Time (days)Mid-late Aprilsteelhead daily mortality

  • Early MayMid-late MayPercent SpillWater Transit Time (days)Mid-late Aprilsteelhead daily mortality

  • Yearling Chinook survivalLGR-MCNMCN-BON98990402030001060705990402030001060705Outmigration year

  • Yearling Chinook survivalLGR-MCNMCN-BON98990402030001060705990402030001060705Outmigration year

  • Yearling Chinook survivalLGR-MCNMCN-BON9899040203000106070599040203000106070563%38%Outmigration year

  • LGR-MCNMCN-BONsteelhead survival98990402030001060705990402030001060705Outmigration year

  • LGR-MCNMCN-BONsteelhead survival98990402030001060705990402030001060705Outmigration year

  • LGR-MCNMCN-BONsteelhead survival9899040203000106070599040203000106070576%70%Outmigration year

  • Early MayMid-late MayPercent SpillWater Transit Time (days)Mid-late AprilYearling Chinook survival

  • Early MayMid-late MayPercent SpillWater Transit Time (days)Mid-late AprilSteelhead survival

  • Percent SpillWater Transit Time (days)

  • Percent SpillUnimpounded Chinook survival = ~ 0.89 (Raymond 1979)

  • Travel time is related to river velocity: the higher the water velocity, the higher the rate of fish migration.

    Impounding the river reduced the river velocity and migration rate of both juvenile Chinook salmon and steelheads to one-third that through free-flowing stretches of river.

    Prior to construction of new dams (1966 to 1968), survival of wild Chinook salmon from the Salmon River to Ice Harbor Dam averaged 89% (range 85 to 95%). Following completion of Lower Monumental and Little Goose Dams (1970), average survival to Ice Harbor Dam sharply declined to 33% (range 12 to 50%).31 years ago-Raymond (1979)

  • ConclusionsJuvenile travel times, mortality rates and survival rates through the hydrosystem are strongly influenced by managed river conditions (water transit time and spill levels).

    Statistical relationships accurately predict the effects of environmental factors and management strategies on migration and survival rates of juvenile yearling Chinook and steelhead.

    Improvements in in-river survival and travel times can be achieved through reductions in water transit time or increased spill.