keith brander imber-godae 12 june 2007 variability and shifts in marine ecosytems keith brander...
TRANSCRIPT
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
Variability and shifts in marine ecosytems
Keith BranderICES/GLOBEC Coordinator
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
People are interested in climate change and in changes in
marine ecosystems.
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
Rapid spread of tropical species along the continental slope
Is the rate of biological shift commensurate with the rate of ocean climate shift?
Should we say:“the ecosystem is changing”
or“the ecosystem is moving”?
What about the conservation of ecosystem functions? Is that allowed to move too?
Is fish production affected?
Should we be managing differently?
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
1 Biogeographic shifts of ~ 50km y-1 in NE Atlantic
2 Increases in number of warm water species
Attributed to (i) advection and (ii) change in local properties i.e transport of both biota and heat, salt etc.
(Issue of Eulerian vs Lagrangian observation)
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
Southern shelf edge species Psuedo-oceanic temperate species
Changes in range of copepod species - Beaugrand et al. 2002 Science Based on 176,778 CPR samples.
Euchaeta gracilis, Euchaeta hebes, Ctenocalanus vanus, Calanoides carinatus
Rhincalanus nasutus, Eucalanus crassus, Centropages typicus, Candacia armata, C. helgolandicus
Other taxa have also shifted at similar rates
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
Northward spread of cod at West Greenland from 1917-1939
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
1910 1915 1920 1925 1930 1935 1940
Sea
Surf
ace
Tem
per
ature
Other areas have shown similar rates
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
The cod stock at Greenland is recovering as
conditions there get warmer.
A positive effect which poses some management
questions:• How should it be managed?
• What about the shrimp fishery?
• What about sharing with Iceland?
• Could Greenland help recovery of Canadian stocks?
• IPCC predicts slow warming at Greenland
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
Cod recruitment at Greenland
Years 1971-97From ICES CM 2001/ACFM:20
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0 group abundance Dohrn Bank and E Greenland
Gre
enla
nd R
84
73
85
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
Decline of the Baltic cod stock will this continue?
• Less inflow of Atlantic water
• Falling salinity
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
Recovery of Gulf of St Lawrence cod stock – has begun now the environment has improved
• 2004 year class is biggest since 1980
• Survival is higher
• Seal predation is lower
Recent rise in temperature
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
Mois - Month
Pro
fond
eur
–D
epth
(m)
Figure 2: Monthly temperatures by depth for the Northern Gulf with recaptures of tagged cod (yellow box-plots).
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
Regime shifts in N Pacific – are the (physical and biological) processes non-linear?
Note use of regional synoptic indices
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
Data sources, current trends, attribution of causes
Sources•Time series of commercial fish species for many areas
•Time series (near-surface mesozooplankton) from CPR for some areas
Trends•Northward distribution shifts (fish, plankton) in NE Atlantic
•Decline in abundance of many fish species
Attribution•Physical forcing is both local and via large scale advection
•Biological forcing could be top-down or bottom-up
•Very strong direct human impact through fishing
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
Data and analyses needed
• Improved availability and presentation of trends and changes in ocean properties (at many scales)
• Climate scenarios which include ocean properties (temperature, salinity, advection, upwelling, stratification)
• Compilation and interpretation of comparative regional data to test the attribution of change
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
Gaps
• Few time series of marine biota are suitable for detecting and attributing effects of climate change (whether in distribution, abundance or phenology)
• (mention Perkinsus – oyster parasite, as a good example which combines observation and modelling to determine causes)
• The geographic and biotic coverage of this presentation is itself limited
Keith Brander IMBER-GODAE 12 June 2007
Sensitivity/vulnerability
• Some marine ecosystems are topographically bounded, but others (e.g. planktonic systems) are not, therefore they can shift distributions quickly.
• Shallow areas are more vulnerable to changes in temperature and salinity (the communities there are also more adapted to extremes)
• Coastal areas are vulnerable (and relatively well studied), but are usually impacted by many anthropogenic factors other than climate change