key interactions of polysorbates in protein formulations · • interfacial stresses may lead to...

15
Key Interactions of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations Hanns-Christian Mahler & Kishore Ravuri Pharmaceutical Development & Supplies, PTD Biologics EU Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland Surfactants are potent Stabilizers for Proteins against Interfacial Stresses “Interfacial stresses“ are encountered during many stages of production, shipment and use e.g. Air/liquid interfaces (e.g. shaking) Ice/Liquid interfaces (e.g. freezing and thawing) Surface interactions (e.g. manufacturing equipment) Interfacial stresses may lead to “protein instabilities“ such as adsorption, aggregation or precipitation (“particle formation“) Kiese et al, J. Pharm Sci. 2008, 2009 Surfactants (such as the non-ionic Polysorbate 20 or 80) effectively protect Proteins against aggregation caused by interface-induced stresses and adsorption Carpenter, Arakawa et al. 1992; Kendrick et al. 1996; Kerwin, Heller et al. 1998; Randolph and Jones 2002; Mahler, Mueller et al. 2005; Kiese et al., 2008/2009

Upload: others

Post on 15-Mar-2020

15 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Key Interactions of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations · • Interfacial stresses may lead to “protein instabilities“ such as adsorption, aggregation or precipitation (“particle

Key Interactions of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations

Hanns-Christian Mahler & Kishore RavuriPharmaceutical Development & Supplies, PTD Biologics EUHoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland

Surfactants are potent Stabilizers for Proteins against Interfacial Stresses

• “Interfacial stresses“ are encountered during many stages of production, shipment and use e.g.

– Air/liquid interfaces (e.g. shaking)

– Ice/Liquid interfaces (e.g. freezing and thawing)

– Surface interactions (e.g. manufacturing equipment)

• Interfacial stresses may lead to “protein instabilities“ such as adsorption, aggregation or precipitation (“particle formation“) Kiese et al, J. Pharm Sci. 2008, 2009

• Surfactants (such as the non-ionic Polysorbate 20 or 80) effectively protect Proteins against aggregation caused by interface-induced stresses and adsorption Carpenter, Arakawa et al. 1992; Kendrick et al. 1996; Kerwin, Heller et al. 1998; Randolph and Jones 2002; Mahler, Mueller et al. 2005; Kiese et al., 2008/2009

Page 2: Key Interactions of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations · • Interfacial stresses may lead to “protein instabilities“ such as adsorption, aggregation or precipitation (“particle

x+y+z+w=20O

O

O

OH

O

OOH

OOH x

y

z

10

O

w

Polysorbate 20

Fatty acid ester

6

6

O

OO

O

OH

O

OOH

OOH x

y

z

w

Polysorbate 80

1,4 anhydro-sorbitol

Poly-oxy-ethylene

Polysorbate 20 and 80 are the most widely used Surfactants in Protein Formulations

70% of marketed antibodies are formulated with Polysorbates Typical concentrations of PS20/PS80 range from 0.001-0.1% (w/v)

Effective protection of proteins against aggregation caused by interface-induced stresses and adsorption

Polysorbate concentration

Pro

tein

con

cent

ratio

n

How Polysorbates stabilize Proteins

Page 3: Key Interactions of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations · • Interfacial stresses may lead to “protein instabilities“ such as adsorption, aggregation or precipitation (“particle

Effect of mechanical stress on Mab T in the presence and absence of Polysorbate

0 % 0.005 % 0.01 % 0.02 % 0.05 % PS20

Polysorbate stabilize (many) Proteins against shaking-induced aggregation/precipitationKiese, S., Pappenberger, A. Friess, W., Mahler, H.-C. (2008) J. Pharm. Sci 97(10):4347-4366

• Note: the CMC of Polysorbates does not unequivocally correlate to the stabilization behaviourMahler, H.-C., Senner, F., Mäder, K., Müller, R. (2009) J.Pharm.Sci. 98(12):4525-33

Mechanism of Polysorbate Function(s)

Page 4: Key Interactions of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations · • Interfacial stresses may lead to “protein instabilities“ such as adsorption, aggregation or precipitation (“particle

Adsorption of polysorbate to interface: a surface tension treatmentKishore Ravuri, yet unpublished results

c[MAB]

c[MAB]

c[MAB]

Prot

ein

conc

entr

atio

n (m

g/m

L)

PolysorbatConcentration (μM)1 10 100 1000

[PS] < CMC[PS] < CMC[PS] << CMC [PS] > CMC[PS] = CMC[PS] = CMC

0

c[MAB]

c[MAB]

c[MAB] Antibody

Polysorbate

Interface

A

A

B

B

C

C

Langmuir adsorption isotherm adsorption equation

Stronger adsorption of polysorbate 20 observed in surface tension isotherm demonstrating that the stabilizing ability of the surfactant is surface energy driven.

Interaction of non-ionic surfactants with proteins: Studies with ITCKishore Ravuri, yet unpublished results

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5

-24

-22

-20

-18

-16

-14-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Time (min)

µca

l/sec

Inte

rgra

ted

hea

ts (

μcal

)

• Low binding constants (K= 102-103 M-1 )

• Comparable to literature e.g. Garidel et.al.

• The above results confirms that interactions between surfactant and protein are non specific.

• Stabilizing effect of non-ionic surfactants is NOT interaction driven.

ITC titration of a non-ionic surfactant into a 10mg/mL mAb formulation, 20mM His/HCl, pH6, 25 °C

Page 5: Key Interactions of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations · • Interfacial stresses may lead to “protein instabilities“ such as adsorption, aggregation or precipitation (“particle

Synthesis of Polysorbates and Polysorbate Heterogeneity

NaOH,NaLaurate/NaOleate

H2O2

Phosphorous oxyacids

H. Vu Dang et al. / J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 40 (2006) 1155–1165

OHOH

OH

OH

OH

OH

O

OH OH

OH

OH

OO

O

OH

OH

OOH

OOH x

y

z

w

OO

O

OH

OCOR

OOH

OOH x

y

z

w

O

Fatty acids

1,4 sorbitan

Industrial Synthesis of Polysorbates

Page 6: Key Interactions of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations · • Interfacial stresses may lead to “protein instabilities“ such as adsorption, aggregation or precipitation (“particle

OO

O

OH

OCOR

OOH

OOH x

y

z

w

Desired molecule!

LC-MS TIC of polysorbate

OO

O

OCOR

OCOR

OOH

OOH x

y

z

w

On H

O n COR O

O

O

O

O

OH

OH n

n

O

O

O

OO

O n

n

COR

COR

PEG, Fatty acid/salts

OO

O

OH

OH

OOH

OOH x

y

z

w

O

O

O

OO

O n

n

OH

OH

On H

O n OH O

O

O

O

O

OH

OH n

n

• High batch to batch & supplier variabilityH. Vu Dang et al. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 40 (2006) 1155–1165

Side Products in Synthesis of Polysorbates

Some challenges in the context of the use of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations

1. Adsorption of Polysorbate

Page 7: Key Interactions of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations · • Interfacial stresses may lead to “protein instabilities“ such as adsorption, aggregation or precipitation (“particle

Polysorbates can significantly adsorb to some filtersMahler, H.-C., Huber, F., Ravuri, S.K.K., Reindl, J., Rückert, P., Müller, R. (2010) J. Pharm. Sci.

• Dilution effects in filters (e.g. due to residual water), observed via parallel change of protein concentration and conductivity

• Adsorption of Polysorbate 80 to filters (>80% recovery after 3L pre-rinse with Product)

Filtrate volume (L)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 1 2 3 4 5

0

1

2

3

4

5

Protein conc.

Pro

tein

co

nc. (

mg/

mL

)

Filtrate volume (L)

Conductivity Co

nduc

tivity

(m

S/c

m)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 1 2 3 4 5

0

20

40

60

80

100

rel. Polysorbate 80

rel.

Po

lyso

rba

te 8

0 (

%)

Conductivity

Co

nd

uct

ivity

(m

S/c

m)

Some challenges in the context of the use of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations

2. Polysorbates in Formulations used for preclinical animal (Dog) studies

Page 8: Key Interactions of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations · • Interfacial stresses may lead to “protein instabilities“ such as adsorption, aggregation or precipitation (“particle

Pseudoallergenic reaction in dogs after administration of Polysorbate

• Polysorbate 20 (Tween 20) used for i.v. formulation of protein (stabilizer)

• A tox study was performed with rats and dogs: also placebo vehicle showed a pseudoallergic reaction in the dogs (well tolerated in rats and monkeys – as well as humans)

dogs to be excluded for tox studies with formulations containing polysorbates because hypersensitive compared to other species

• Potential mechanisms:

– Histamine-releasing properties of polysorbates Masini et al. (1985)

10 mg/kg of Polysorbate 80* caused severe hypotension after first administration and increase in plasma histamine

– Haemolytic properties of polysorbates Krantz et al. (1948!)

haemolysis of red blood cells in vitro due to the solubilizing activity of Tween 20 at concentrations > 100 mg/ 100 ml

Some challenges in the context of the use of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations

3. Degradation of Polysorbates in Bulk and/or aqueous formulation

Page 9: Key Interactions of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations · • Interfacial stresses may lead to “protein instabilities“ such as adsorption, aggregation or precipitation (“particle

Fatty acids

OO

O

OH

O

OOH

OOH x

y

z

10

O

w

Peroxides, formic and acetic acid

pH,

Temperature

Temperature

Light, O2, metals

Auto-oxidation Hydrolysis

1973

1978

1978

2007

2002

Polysorbates Can Undergo Degradation

Mechanistic picture Findings from investigations:Degradants isolated from placebo formulations stored at 25°C for 20 months

9

O

OO

O

OHO

OOH

OOH x

y

z

w

OHO

O

O

n

OH

OOH

OO

O

n

OHO

O

O

OHO

O

OHO

O

O

OHO

O

OHO

O

O

OH

O

OH

O

O

O

OH

O

OO

OH

O

O

OO

O

OO

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

OH

O

HOH

O

H

O

aldehydes

ketones

alkanes

fatty acid esters

fatty acids

small molecules

Major degradants Minor degradants

Polysorbate 206

6

O

OO

O

OHO

OOH

OOH x

y

z

w

OHO

O O

O

OO

OO

OO

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

OH

O

HOH

OH

O

OH

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

Aldehydes Ketones

Alkanes

Fatty acidsSmall molecules

O

O

OH

O

O

OH

O

OH

O

Major degradants

Minor degradants

Polysorbate 80

Page 10: Key Interactions of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations · • Interfacial stresses may lead to “protein instabilities“ such as adsorption, aggregation or precipitation (“particle

Dominant Mechanisms In Polysorbate DegradationKishore, R.S.K., Pappenberger, A., Bauer Dauphin, I., Ross, A., Buergi, B., Staempfli, A., Mahler, H.-C. J. Pharm Sci., 2011, 100: 721

O

O O

O

OO

O

OOH

OOH

OOH

O

n

x

y z

m

H

H H

H

H

O

O O

O

OO

OH

OOH

OOH

OOH

n

x

y z

OH

Om

H+

-H+

+

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0 4 8 12months

Poly

sorb

ate

(mg/

mL)

Profile of NMR signals of fatty acid in PS20

5 °C

25 °C

40 °C

Ester hydrolysis

Temp (°C) k (h-1) t1/2 (h)

PS20

5 9e-07 5.50e05

25 5e-05 1.39e04

40 2e-04 3.47e03

PS805 4e-07 1.73e06

25 5e-05 1.39e04

• t1/2 of Polysorbate20 hydrolysis at 40°C was about 5 months

• t1/2 of Polsyorbate20 hydrolysis at 5°C was negligible

Auto-oxidation of PEG

OOH

O O

C

O

OHHformic acid

OO

OOH

H

O

O

CH2 O

OH2

formaldehyde

O

OHH

formic acid

OO

OO

O

O

O

O OO

CH2 CH2

OO

Oacetaldehydeacetic acid

H

O

OH

O

Dominant Mechanisms In Polysorbate DegradationKishore R. S. K., Kiese S., Fischer S., Pappenberger A., Grauschopf U., Mahler H.-C. Pharm Res. 2011, 28:1194

Buildup of acids and aldehydes

Decker et al, Die Makromolekulare Chemie, 1974, 3531-3540

Storck et al, Die Makromolekulare Chemie, 1966, 50-73

9

O

OO

O

OHO

OOH

OOH x

y

z

w

OHO

OO

n

O

n

HH

R

OH C O OO

n

O

n

H

OHO

OO

n

O

n

OOH

O2

OO

n

O

n OH

HCHO+HCOOH

-1

fatty acids

Page 11: Key Interactions of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations · • Interfacial stresses may lead to “protein instabilities“ such as adsorption, aggregation or precipitation (“particle

• Auto-oxidation plays a dominant role in degradation of polysorbates. The rate of Hydrolysis is negligible at pharmaceutically relevant conditions (drug product storage of 5 °C & 25 °C )

• Along with rupture of PEG chains, there also occurs rampant degradation at the olefinic sites.

• It is likely that the radical initiation occurs first at the olefin site and then spreads to the PEG chains.

0 10 20

40

80

120

160

Con

cen

trat

ion

(μm

ol/L

)

Time (weeks)

Peroxide formation in placebos containing 0.02% PS20 and PS80 at 40 °C

Changes in PS20 and PS80 concentration measurement by micelle method over 1 year at 25 and 5 °C

Mechanistic PictureSummary

Impact of Polysorbate degradation on protein formulationsOverall considerations

• What is the impact of decreased surfactant content on the stability of the protein? Not enough stabilizer??

• What is the impact of decreased surfactant content on the stability of the protein? Not enough stabilizer??

Effect of decreased surfactant content

• What do the degradants do to the protein?• Do degradants impact product quality other

than interacting with protein?

• What do the degradants do to the protein?• Do degradants impact product quality other

than interacting with protein?

Effect of insoluble degradants from

hydrolysis

• What influence does auto-oxidation of PS have on the mAb?

• What influence does auto-oxidation of PS have on the mAb?

Effect of peroxides from auto-oxidation

Page 12: Key Interactions of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations · • Interfacial stresses may lead to “protein instabilities“ such as adsorption, aggregation or precipitation (“particle

Unshaken Shaken0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Unshaken Shaken0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Unshaken Shaken0

2

4

6

Mab340mo 5°C

Mab224mo 5°C

Solu

ble

Aggr

ega

te C

ont

ent

(S

E-H

PLC

(%

))

PS20 PS80

Mab112mo 5°C

Unshaken Shaken0

2

4

6

Unshaken Shaken0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Unshaken Shaken0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

not tested

Initial Post Storage0.00

0.01

0.02

Initial Post Storage0.00

0.01

0.02

Initial Post Storage0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

Mab340mo 5°C

Mab224mo 5°C

PS

Con

tent

(%

)

PS20 PS80

Mab112mo 5°C

Initial Post Storage0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

Initial Post Storage0.00

0.01

0.02

Initial Post Storage0.00

0.01

0.02

not tested

Polysorbate content (by micelle assay)Soluble aggregates

Impact of Polysorbate degradation on protein formulationsEnd of shelf life shake stress

1E-4 1E-3 0.01

0

10

20

30

40

Surf

ace

Pres

sure

(mN

/m)

relative PS20 concentration (w/v)

1E-4 1E-3 0.01

0

10

20

30

40

relative PS80 concentration (w/v)

• Degradation products of PS still show surface activity even after 60% loss of content by micelle assay

PS20 at t0

Surface pressure measured in 20mM His/HCl with PS20 and PS80

PS20 at t12 PS80 at t0

PS80 at t12

Impact of Polysorbate degradation on protein formulationsSurface pressure in aged formulations

Page 13: Key Interactions of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations · • Interfacial stresses may lead to “protein instabilities“ such as adsorption, aggregation or precipitation (“particle

Insoluble degradants

PS20 PS80

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

F1 F3 F5 F7 F2 F4 F6 F8 F9 F11 F13 F15 F10 F12 F14 F16 F17 F18 F19 F20 F21 F22 F23 F24

mg/

ml S

urfa

ctan

t

t=9M5°C

t=9M25°C

PS20 PS80

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

%ox

idiz

ed

Impact of Polysorbate degradation on protein formulationsOxidation

+ Exc.X + Exc.X

+ Exc.X + Exc.X

Formulations F1-F24

Formulations F1-F24

Initial conc.

Surfactant content determination

% Fc Methionine Oxidation observed in protein at 25 °C

Page 14: Key Interactions of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations · • Interfacial stresses may lead to “protein instabilities“ such as adsorption, aggregation or precipitation (“particle

Impact of Polysorbate degradation on protein formulationsSummary

• Surface pressure experiments show comparable surface tension

• End of shelf life studies show effective protection even with decreased surfactant content

• Surface pressure experiments show comparable surface tension

• End of shelf life studies show effective protection even with decreased surfactant content

Effect of decreased surfactant content

• Fatty acids can appear as visible or subvisibleparticles

• Fatty acids may induce aggregation, above a threshold concentration

• Fatty acids can appear as visible or subvisibleparticles

• Fatty acids may induce aggregation, above a threshold concentration

Effect of insoluble degradants from

hydrolysis

• Degradation of polysorbates correlates to extent of oxidation in mAbs

• It is possible that peroxides generated from PS degradation causes mAb oxidation

• Degradation of polysorbates correlates to extent of oxidation in mAbs

• It is possible that peroxides generated from PS degradation causes mAb oxidation

Effect of peroxides from auto-oxidation

Overall Summary and Conclusions

• Polysorbates are a complex mixture of Sorbitan-POE-fattyacid esters

• Polysorbates stabilize (most) Proteins (against interfacial stress-induced aggregation) and can minimize protein adsorption to interfaces

• Polysorbates can adsorb to e.g. filters and other material

• Degradation may occur in bulk and/or pharmaceutical formulations via hydrolysis or by auto-oxidation (major pathway)

• Polysorbates can degrade and this requires sufficient attention during formulation development

Page 15: Key Interactions of Polysorbates in Protein Formulations · • Interfacial stresses may lead to “protein instabilities“ such as adsorption, aggregation or precipitation (“particle

We Innovate Healthcare