key key theory #1: warfarewesttmsa.weebly.com/uploads/8/7/0/8/87088426/csi... · reasons that could...

5
Theory #1: Warfare For many years archaeologists believed the Mayans to be a nonviolent, peaceful, and gentle people. However, we now know that the Mayans warfare was intense and ongoing. Too, many records indicate that Mayan warfare was likely irresolvable since they frequently fought against the same enemy. Archaeological records show that wars became more intense and frequent around 800 CE. That evidence comes from discoveries of several types. First, archaeological excavations have turned up massive fortifications surrounding many Maya sites. What do you think, detective? Why would a peaceful and pacifist society need such massive walls around their city? Second, a great variety of Mayan stone monuments, ceramics, and paintings depict warfare and the taking of slaves. Finally, archaeologists have been able to decipher the Mayan system of writing - and many inscriptions have been found that boasted of conquests throughout the area. In fact, records from many Mayan leaders show that the Maya were obsessed with war. Historian Michael Coe, author of The Maya , shows the Mayan warlike nature when he states that, “The Annals of the Kaqchikels and the Popol Vuh speak of little but intertribal conflict among the highlanders, while the sixteen states of Yucatan were constantly battling with each other over boundaries and lineage honor. Archaeologists made a huge discovery in 2005 that even more solidified the argument that the Mayans were warlike in nature. A 1,200 year-old mass grave was uncovered in Guatemala that turned up some 45 skeletons, including the Mayan king Kan Maax and and his wife. Many appear to have been killed as as a result of sharp spear jabs to the throat. Others were found to have been dismembered in a ritualistic way, likely to please their gods. Due to their strong appetite for war, historians and archaeologists believe this is one great factor that contributed to the Mayan downfall. Mayan rulers would command their followers to wage a war for some material good (maybe land, water, other resources). It is also possible a war was fought in the name of religion, maybe to please one of the several nature gods the Mayans worshipped. Interesting though, is that historians used to think that the Mayans were peaceful - so something drastically changed to make the Mayans seem more warlike. Could something have precipitated the increased Mayan warfare? It is possible something forced the Mayans to become more warlike? 1.) What reasons have convinced historians that the Mayans were warlike? ________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2.) What do you think, detective? Is it possible that warfare can cause a civilization to fall apart? Why or why not? ___________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3.) Historians used to think the Mayans were a peaceful society but have since changed their mind. What are at least TWO reasons that could have forced the Mayans to become more warlike? __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ KEY KEY massive fortifications monuments, pottery, paintings that depict war writing boasts of warfare and conquests mass grave with gruesome, warlike deaths answers will vary. answers will vary, but can include self defense, food or water scarcity, fight over land, etc.

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jun-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: KEY KEY Theory #1: Warfarewesttmsa.weebly.com/uploads/8/7/0/8/87088426/csi... · reasons that could have forced the Mayans to become more warlike? _____ _____ _____ _____ KEY KEY

Theory #1: WarfareFor many years archaeologists believed the Mayans to be a nonviolent, peaceful, and gentle people. However, we now know that the Mayans warfare was intense and ongoing. Too, many records indicate that Mayan warfare was likely irresolvable since they frequently fought against the same enemy.

Archaeological records show that wars became more intense and frequent around 800 CE. That evidence comes from discoveries of several types. First, archaeological excavations have turned up massive fortifications surrounding many Maya sites. What do you think, detective? Why would a peaceful and pacifist society need such massive walls around their city? Second, a great variety of Mayan stone monuments, ceramics, and paintings depict warfare and the taking of slaves. Finally, archaeologists have been able to decipher the Mayan system of writing - and many inscriptions have been found that boasted of conquests throughout the area. In fact, records from many Mayan leaders show that the Maya were obsessed with war. Historian Michael Coe, author of The Maya, shows the Mayan warlike nature when he states that,

“The Annals of the Kaqchikels and the Popol Vuh speak of little but intertribal conflict among the highlanders, while

the sixteen states of Yucatan were constantly battling with each other over boundaries and lineage honor.”

Archaeologists made a huge discovery in 2005 that even more solidified the argument that the Mayans were warlike in nature. A 1,200 year-old mass grave was uncovered in Guatemala that turned up some 45 skeletons, including the Mayan king Kan Maax and and his wife. Many appear to have been killed as as a result of sharp spear jabs to the throat. Others were found to have been dismembered in a ritualistic way, likely to please their gods.

Due to their strong appetite for war, historians and archaeologists believe this is one great factor that contributed to the Mayan downfall. Mayan rulers would command their followers to wage a war for some material good (maybe land, water, other resources). It is also possible a war was fought in the name of religion, maybe to please one of the several nature gods the Mayans worshipped. Interesting though, is that historians used to think that the Mayans were peaceful - so something drastically changed to make the Mayans seem more warlike. Could something have precipitated the increased Mayan warfare? It is possible something forced the Mayans to become more warlike?

1.) What reasons have convinced historians that the Mayans were warlike? ________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2.) What do you think, detective? Is it possible that warfare can cause a civilization to fall apart? Why or why not? ___________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

3.) Historians used to think the Mayans were a peaceful society but have since changed their mind. What are at least TWO reasons that could have forced the Mayans to become more warlike? __________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

KEY KEY

massive fortificationsmonuments, pottery, paintings that depict warwriting boasts of warfare and conquestsmass grave with gruesome, warlike deaths

answers will vary.

answers will vary, but can include self defense, food or water scarcity, fight over land, etc.

Page 2: KEY KEY Theory #1: Warfarewesttmsa.weebly.com/uploads/8/7/0/8/87088426/csi... · reasons that could have forced the Mayans to become more warlike? _____ _____ _____ _____ KEY KEY

Theory #2: DiseaseIt is important to remember that when the Spanish arrived in the early 16th century they still found plenty of people of Mayan decent, only the great Mayan cities were empty. For some reason the Mayans vacated their impressive cities - maybe it was an outbreak of disease that caused the Mayan population to rapidly decline and the remaining people to flee the cities?

It is believed that two massive epidemics greatly affected the Mayan population. The first attacked the Mayan food supply. An insect from the “plant hopper” family known as thePeregrinus maidis has beenlinked to spreading a virusthat infected the top Mayancrop: maize. This diseaseis most deadly in Central America and in the southwestern United States. In fact, similar cropdiseases hit the Anasazi, a native tribe in the American southwest. The high humidity in tropical areas, especially in Central America, make conditions for this disease very suitable, which is one reason why this disease is common

in this area. Also, this disease is only deadly in areas where maize is cultivated year-long. The Mayans relied heavily on the maize crop, so much that farmers routinely grew it throughout the year. If the maize crop was infected, it would make sense that the Mayans would abandon their urban centers since they might have had to “fend for themselves” to find enough food to survive.

Second, some believe that the introduction of yellow fever doomedthe Mayan civilization. Many monkeys, especially the Howler monkey, are known carriers of yellow fever. Thisdisease can also be transmitted to bats and mosquitos, which can then pass the disease onto other hosts. Is it possible that an infected howler monkey wandered into Chichén Itzá, a major Mayan capital, and passed on this disease to the people? Sure it is, detective. But, how might the howler monkey have gotten infected in the first place? The yellow fever originated in Africa and it was not until the slave trade in the 1500s that is came to the Americas.

Peregrinus maidis

Howler Monkey

1.) What are the two theories that disease caused the Mayan downfall? ___________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2.) Which of these theories seems more plausible? Why? _______________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

©, Mr. Educator, 2014

KEY KEY

- a plant hopper known as the Peregrinus Maidis spread infection to their major crop, maize

- yellow fever spread by Howler monkeys doomed Mayans

likely the infection of maize, since Howler monkeys would not have been around at the time of the Mayans, but other breeds of monkeys could have still spread the disease.

©HistorywithMr.E-ASocialStudiesProfessionalSpecializinginAmericanandWorldHistoryforlateElementary,Middle,andearlyHighSchool

Page 3: KEY KEY Theory #1: Warfarewesttmsa.weebly.com/uploads/8/7/0/8/87088426/csi... · reasons that could have forced the Mayans to become more warlike? _____ _____ _____ _____ KEY KEY

Theory #3: Famine

Many researchers believe that the Mayans succumbed to a disastrous famine, or a period of extreme food scarcity. One of the reasons for this famine stems from the Mayan practice of what is known as “slash and burn” agriculture. This practice is most popularin areas that are heavilyforested, or in areas wherethere is little good land forfarming. Most of the vegetation on a piece of land is cut down, then fire is set to the remaining area. The resulting ashes serve as valuable nutrients to help future crops grow.

Slash and burn agriculture is not sustainable and will only be effective for a short time. In fact, geologists today estimate that this technique will sustain the land for three to five years, but then the land will need to be left fallow for ten years to regain its fertility. To the Mayans, this type of farming was risky - they were likely desperate to

feed their local population yet they unknowingly put their civilization in extreme danger.

As the Mayan land became less fertile, the civilization became unable to support itself. Slowly, crop yields became less and less. The Mayan population, however, continued to grow. Being unable to provide for its population, the major Mayan cities slowly lost people to the countryside. Slash and burn methods had placed the Mayans at the mercy of environmental factors more now than ever before. Already seeing crop yields deplete year after year, how would just one season of low rainfall affect the Mayans? Every civilization experiences a time of drought - given their farming techniques, how would the Mayans respond when became faced with these circumstances? What if an invasive bug or disease dooms a years worth of crops? It seems obvious that famine doomed the Mayans.

Slash and burn agriculture is still practiced by many Mayans today!

1.) What is the “slash and burn” style of agriculture and what are the effects of it? __________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2.) What do you know about the harmful effects of this type of agriculture? _______________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

3.) Why does it seem obvious that the Mayans were likely affected by drought? ____________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

KEY KEY

- vegetation is burned to the ground, then ash is used as fertilizer to help grow crops. This depletes soil nutrients quickly.

- Soil will only last for 3-5 years before will need to stay dormant for 10 years. Slowly crop yields will decline before no food can be grown.

- Because all it would take is a small drought to greatly affect the Mayans since their soil depletion would have already led to low crop yields.

©HistorywithMr.E-ASocialStudiesProfessionalSpecializinginAmericanandWorldHistoryforlateElementary,Middle,andearlyHighSchool

Page 4: KEY KEY Theory #1: Warfarewesttmsa.weebly.com/uploads/8/7/0/8/87088426/csi... · reasons that could have forced the Mayans to become more warlike? _____ _____ _____ _____ KEY KEY

Theory #4: Disaster or

Environmental ChangeSurrounded by pyramids, plazas, ball courts, and government buildings, the Maya discussed philosophy, developed an accurate solar-year calendar, and relished a thick, bitter beverage made from cacao beans: the world's first hot chocolate. Farmers, too, were riding high, turning hillsides into terraced fields to feed the burgeoning population.

Then came the bust, a decline that lasted at least two centuries. By 1100 the residents of once thriving Maya cities seem to have just up and left. But where did they flee to, and why?

The latest Maya climate-change study, released in 2012, analyzes a stalagmites in a cave in Belize—those lumpy, rocky spires on cave floors—to link climate swings to explain the fall of the empire.

Formed by water and minerals dripping from above, stalagmites grow quicker in rainier years, giving scientists a reliable record of historical precipitation trends. One sample used in the new study, for example, documents fluctuations as far back as 2,000 years ago.

Among the trends revealed by the Belizean stalagmites: "The early Classic Maya period was unusually wet, wetter than the previous thousand years," according to study leader Douglas Kennett, an environmental anthropologist at Pennsylvania State University. "During this time, the population increased rapidly," aided by a surge in agriculture.

During the wettest decades, from 440 to 660, cities sprouted. All the hallmarks of Maya civilization—sophisticated political systems, monumental architecture, complex religion—came into full flower during this era. But this 200-year-long wet spell turned out to be an anomaly. When

the climate pendulum swung back, hard times followed.

"Mayan systems were founded on those [high] rainfall patterns," Kennett said. "They could not support themselves when patterns changed." The following centuries, from about 660 to 1000, were characterized by repeated and, at times extreme, drought. Agriculture declined and—at the same time—social conflict rose, Kennett says.

The Maya religious and political system was based on the belief that rulers were in direct communication with the gods. When these divine connections failed to produce rainfall and good harvests, tensions likely developed. Within the scant 25 years between 750 and 775, for example, 39 embattled rulers seized power in the empire— evidence of "rivalry, war, and strategic alliances," according to Kennett's study.

But times would get even harder. The stalagmite record suggests that between 1020 and 1100 the region suffered its longest dry spell of the last 2,000 years. With it, the study suggests,

came Maya crop failure, famine, mass migration, and death.

By the time Spanish conquistadors arrived in the 16th century, inland Maya populations had decreased by 90 percent, and urban centers had been largely abandoned. Farms had become overgrown and cities reclaimed by forest.

Stalagmites such as these were analyzed to show an excessive wet period during the Mayan “golden age.” They also show an incredible drought immediately following.

KEY KEY

©HistorywithMr.E-ASocialStudiesProfessionalSpecializinginAmericanandWorldHistoryforlateElementary,Middle,andearlyHighSchool

Page 5: KEY KEY Theory #1: Warfarewesttmsa.weebly.com/uploads/8/7/0/8/87088426/csi... · reasons that could have forced the Mayans to become more warlike? _____ _____ _____ _____ KEY KEY

1.) How have researchers determined that the Mayans were affected by drought? __________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2.) What are TWO reasons that would make you believe the results of this study ? ________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

3.) Think about the argument that is made in this theory. How might a drought create an environment that allowed the other three theories to develop? After you explain how each of the other theories can be created because of a drought, cross each one out: WARFARE# # DISEASE # # FAMINE

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

- Stalagmites in a cave in Belize have shown very wet periods, followed by an incredibly dry period that coincides with Mayan downfall.

- it makes sense. drought would lead to social conflict, then possible warlike behavior.

- the times of drought and wet period coincide with Mayan downfall and prosperity.

- the study is recent, in 2012, so there is still active research going on!

Warfare: as drought happens, food supplies dwindle and tribes fight over land, food resources.

Disease: drought causes malnutrition, which leads to weaker immune systems and a greater likely of being affected by a disease

Famine: drought directly causes this because less food can be grown.

©HistorywithMr.E-ASocialStudiesProfessionalSpecializinginAmericanandWorldHistoryforlateElementary,Middle,andearlyHighSchool