kirk johnson (iws 3a sm pm) tim lardy (rms sm6 pm) 1 june 2009 standard missile 6 cooperative earned...

Kirk Johnson (IWS 3A SM PM)

Tim Lardy (RMS SM6 PM)

1 June 2009

Standard Missile 6 Cooperative Earned

Value Program Management

Copyright © 2009 Raytheon Company. All rights reserved.

Customer Success Is Our Mission is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.

Non-technical data per ITAR 120.10(5) 04/21/23

SM-6 Program Summary

Overview – May ‘08Overview – May ‘08

DesignDesignProgram PlanProgram Plan

CapabilityCapability• Provides Area Defense

• Capable of Over-The-Horizon Engagements

• Enabler for Integrated Fire Control

• Capable against Overland Cruise Missile

• Milestone B completed 15 Jun ‘04

• Contract Award 03 Sep ‘04

• SRR/SFR Dec ‘04 – SFR Completed 2 Months Early

• IBR Feb 05

• PDR/Gate 7: Jun ‘05 – Completed 2 Months Early

• DRR/Gate 8: Mar ‘06 – Completed 4 Months Early

• WSMR Testing: ‘07-’09 – Direct Hit on first 2 guided

flights

• DT/OT FY10

• IOC planned in FY10

Guidance Section ElementsAMRAAM

Electronics Stack TransmitterBattery/ECU Power

STANDARDInterface ComputerStable PlatformPlate 3A Two Way Data LinkGPS / IMU Growth Allocation

New SM Size Antenna, MissionComputer

Modify FRU For Semi-active

STANDARD Missile Propulsion Stack, Airframe, Warhead/TDD, Radome

Common Factory ForAMRAAM & SM-6Guidance Sections

Common Factory ForCommon Factory ForAMRAAM & SMAMRAAM & SM--66Guidance SectionsGuidance Sections

Guidance Section ElementsAMRAAM

Electronics Stack TransmitterBattery/ECU Power

STANDARDInterface ComputerStable PlatformPlate 3A Two Way Data LinkGPS / IMU Growth Allocation

New SM Size Antenna, MissionComputer

Modify FRU For Semi-active

STANDARD Missile Propulsion Stack, Airframe, Warhead/TDD, Radome

Common Factory ForAMRAAM & SM-6Guidance Sections

Common Factory ForCommon Factory ForAMRAAM & SMAMRAAM & SM--66Guidance SectionsGuidance Sections

• 80% Complete ITD CPI: .98, ITD SPI: 0.99

• GTV 1 June 08 – Direct Hit

• GTV 2 Sept 08 – Direct Hit

• CTV 29 Jan 09 – Did not launch Retest Aug 09

• GTV 3 scheduled for Nov 09

• First DT/OT missile hardware in work for delivery this fall


LEGACYACQUISITION

MODEL

LEGACYACQUISITION

MODEL

STREAMLINED ACQUISITION MODEL

STREAMLINED ACQUISITION MODEL

Detailed Statement of Work Many Specifications Separate Seeker Developments Subjective Award Fee Separate Factories Customer/Contractor

Relationship

5 Page Statement of Objectives

Single Msl Performance Specification

Common Active Seeker Family

Results-Oriented Objective Award Fee

Common Factories, Volume Production

ToPP- Total Performance Partnering

Acquisition/Cultural ChangesIts Not All Rocket Science

Acquisition Philosophy Must Be As Innovative As Technical SolutionAcquisition Philosophy Must Be As Innovative As Technical Solution


Culture / Communication– High Priority From the Beginning– Develop a Consistent Focused Team Intent on Mission of Delivering

Capability– Small, Engaged, Informed Govt Teaming inside Contractor IPTs– Counterparts Identified and Maintained throughout phase– Web Based Information Sharing System (WISDM)– Combined Contractor/Government Reviews

Business, technical, programmatic– Arbinger Training– Raytheon Six Sigma

Acquisition/Cultural ChangesIts Not All Rocket Science

New Culture Requires Partnership Between Team MembersNew Culture Requires Partnership Between Team Members


Cooperative Successes Government and contractor teams participated in Alpha contracting

process to generate technical scope, schedule & cost baseline for the program– Required alignment of technical objectives, schedule and budget realities– Scope agreements hammered out early in the baselining process– Schedule development took into account the possibility of test failures and

resulted in an executable program plan Successful IBR in Feb 2005

– Baseline is still in effect today (no re-baselines since contract start) RMS provides an EV “quick look” to USN cost team 10 days after

month end to facilitate timely & objective analysis– Data provided in USN preferred WINSIGHT format

Government (USN and DCMA) participates in RMS monthly Earned Value reviews– Diligent participation by execution team and management

SM6 EVMS DCMA COE Audit Results– Kudos received from both DCMA audit teams on SM6 use of Earned Value – SM6 management team received an RMS excellence award for performance

during 2006 EV audit

Cooperation & Management Focus Drove SuccessCooperation & Management Focus Drove Success


Program EVM “Early Warning”Benefits• Principle benefit of EVM during program execution phase is

providing an early warning for future problems– Generated “Watch Account” metric to be able to track Control Account

Performance to EAC CAM’s were spending to EAC but it was not clear if they were actually achieving

the performance necessary to meet EAC New metric tracks actual performance to promised performance

– Allocated MR to antenna supplier to build additional tooling to improve delivery schedule and mitigate risk #183 Antenna delivery schedule from supplier was predicted to drive build of POM GS’s Supplier indicated that additional tooling would improve cycle times and reduce

schedule pressure Antennas are no longer the critical path for GS build

– MBIT Performance metrics (cost/schedule variance, EAC, TCPI, etc.) were showing that

the team was starting to struggle Program worked with functional department to bring in new resources and make

surgical personnel changes Team is back on track, performance has improved & product will be delivered in

time to support production


SM-6 Managing Using EV

Weekly

Monthly

Bi-Monthly

Schedule Updates Critical Path Reviews

(Chaired by PM and Planner)

Schedule Updates Critical Path Reviews


Schedule/Critical Path Reviews


Schedule/Critical Path Reviews


Mangement Reviews

(Chaired by PM)

Mangement Reviews

(Chaired by PM)

Risk/Opportunity Reviews

(Chaired by CE)

Risk/Opportunity Reviews

(Chaired by CE)

Daily

Daily Standup Meetings Status of Pacing Items

(Chaired by PM and CE)

Daily Standup Meetings Status of Pacing Items

(Chaired by PM and CE)


SM-6 Monthly Management Metrics Sampling

CPI/SPI Trend

0.88

0.92

0.96

1

1.04

1.08

1.12

J an-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 J un-06 J ul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06

Month

Actu

als

CPI

SPI

ITD LABOR and MATERIAL CPI/SPI

0.8

0.85

0.9

0.95

1

1.05

1.1

1.15

Nov-05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06

Material ITD CPI

Labor ITD CPI

Material ITD SPI

Labor ITD SPI

CPI/SPI Trend Data

WBS Desc CAM SvCurCvCur SvCur CvCur SpiCur CvCur % Comp BAC LRE

1 C1G2 SWES/CIL/HIL De Hunter Scott -256.7 -335.7 0.000 -335.7 91.13 9,044.1 10,480.3

2 C1F2 Aerodynamic Ana Parry, James -229.9 0.0 0.000 0.0 90.82 1,541.5 1,699.7

3 A2D TDD SHROUD Graffam Ray -137.8 -17.0 0.108 -17.0 46.17 1,883.3 2,062.6

4 A4B15 CSCI Integratio Cohen Amy -128.9 -45.2 0.000 -45.2 38.00 2,570.4 2,516.3

5 A7A7 Missile Level E Badillo Ivelise -119.7 -32.2 0.000 -32.2 10.02 2,556.5 2,409.6

6 A4B11 CSCI Developmen Cohen Amy -112.8 -252.0 0.709 -252.0 33.16 22,445.3 21,686.1

7 A4B14 Target Detectio Abraham, Lisa -89.3 -103.7 0.162 -103.7 56.78 3,428.3 3,742.2

8 A4A5AH Mission Compute Smith Rex -69.1 -40.2 0.198 -40.2 94.02 3,146.5 3,853.4

9 A4A21MN Antenna Prototy Albrecht Ken -67.4 -117.6 0.801 -117.6 84.98 2,487.0 2,897.9

10 A4C21N BIT (NRE) Fritz Bill -64.3 -42.9 0.672 -42.9 35.48 7,989.6 7,755.6

WBS Desc CAM SvCurCvCur SvCur CvCur SpiCur CvCur % Comp BAC LRE

1 C1G2 SWES/CIL/HIL De Hunter Scott -256.7 -335.7 0.000 -335.7 91.13 9,044.1 10,480.3

2 A4B11 CSCI Developmen Cohen Amy -112.8 -252.0 0.709 -252.0 33.16 22,445.3 21,686.1

3 G1D1 MK 698 GMTS Upg Randall Robert H 146.6 -233.1 5.964 -233.1 82.06 3,356.3 2,997.2

5 A2C3N MK 45 Factory Graffam Ray 10.3 -186.7 1.060 -186.7 57.01 3,726.7 4,289.4

6 A4A23M1 Space Stabilize Albrecht Ken 10.7 -138.9 1.201 -138.9 94.09 1,158.2 1,164.8

7 A7A2A GTV1 Integratio Adams, Charlie 28.4 -137.4 1.453 -137.4 23.65 1,811.4 1,678.5

8 A4A21MN Antenna Prototy Albrecht Ken -67.4 -117.6 0.801 -117.6 84.98 2,487.0 2,897.9

9 A4B14 Target Detectio Abraham, Lisa -89.3 -103.7 0.162 -103.7 56.78 3,428.3 3,742.2

10 A4A42M1 Semi-Active FRU Albrecht Ken -0.8 -85.2 0.942 -85.2 62.99 890.2 1,091.8

11 G1D2 AUR BIT Tester Randall Robert H 100.8 -54.6 1.165 -54.6 58.40 4,945.1 4,909.1

Top 10 CM Cost Drivers

-600.0

-500.0

-400.0

-300.0

-200.0

-100.0

0.0

C1G2-SW

ES/CIL

/HIL

Develo

pmen

t

A4B11

-CSCI D

evelopm

ent

G1D1-

MK 6

98 G

MTS U

pgrad

e

A2C3N-M

K 45

Facto

ry

A4A23

M1-

Space

Sta

bilize

d Plat

form

Pro

totyp

e

A7A2A

-GTV1

Integ

ratio

n & A

ccep

tanc

e Tes

t Dev

elopm

ent

A4A21

MN-A

ntenna

Pro

totyp

e

A4B14

-Targ

et D

etec

tion D

evice

(TDD)

A4A42

M1-

Semi-A

ctive

FRU P

roto

type

A2C3R-M

K 45

Facto

ry

A2D-T

DD Shr

oud

$$

Oct-06

Sep-06

Aug-06

Top Ten Cost/Schedule Drivers

EAC Watch AccountsSimulation, Algorithms & Performance - C1F1

11,489.9

$558.6

$680.4 $720.7

$833.8

0.0

3,000.0

6,000.0

9,000.0

12,000.0

15,000.0

Jan-09 ITD Actuals Feb-09 ITD Actuals Mar-09 ITD Actuals Apr-09 ITD Actuals May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09

ITD

Act

ual

s/IT

D F

ore

cast

$0.0

$200.0

$400.0

$600.0

$800.0

$1,000.0

$1,200.0

$1,400.0

$1,600.0

$1,800.0

$2,000.0

Exp

ecte

d -

Ach

ieve

d P

erfo

rman

ce D

elta

ITD Actuals BCWP - (Actuals * TCPIeac) LRE * TCPIeac Achieved Perf ITD LRE 1st Qtr '09 EAC

Total LRE $14,806.7KQ109EAC $15,017.3K3-Mth CPI = 2.70TCPI1Q09eac 1.08

CPI

TCPI

BCWR

August '10 Completion

1.09

1.03

3738.8

1.08

1.08

3919.9

1.09

1.01

3634.3

1.10

.98

3461.3

GTV-3 Tasks / All Teams

33253337

3268

-64

-49

-50

2

3

-42

-22

-35

2500

2600

2700

2800

2900

3000

3100

3200

3300

3400

3500

Tas

ks C

om

ple

ted

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

Del

ta t

o B

asel

ine

Pla

n/F

utu

re C

om

ple

tes

B/L Plan Forecast Finish Cum Actual Delta to Baseline Plan Future Completes Late and Critical to GTV-3

The average number of tasks completed per month is 59 and 15 tasks were completed this month

Now looking as tasks that did not meet their baseline dates.

2008 2009

December January February March April May June July August September

Path 16 d

Path 27 d

Path 38 d

Path 48 d

Path 514 d Progress Risk

4/25/09

Program Milestone - Flight Test (ADSAM4/CTV-1a) Critical Paths 1-5 to

(14517) G/S - Build G/S (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)

(14518) G/S - Deliver G/S to Integration (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)(14269) G/S - Integrate (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)

(14519) G/S - Vibe/Skin/Leak/Fill/Weight CG (ADSAM4/CTV-1

(15424) SIT - AUR Kit Complete (G/S, TDD, PCT, IFTS, ET, (15425) SIT - Assemble Flight Round (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)

(21651) SIT - Test Readiness Review (TRR) ADSAM4/CTV-1a)

(15428) SIT - ADSAM4/CTV-1a Flight Round Test EAT - Tucso

(21652) SIT - ADSAM4/CTV-1a Flight Round EAT Data Review (15430) SIT - Consent to Ship (Gate 9) from Tucson to WSM

(15431) SIT - All ADSAM4/CTV-1a AUR Kit Items Received at

(15432) SIT - Assemble ADSAM4/CTV-1a Flight Round with or

(21653) SIT - TRR for ADSAM4/CTV-1a Flight Round I and T (15436) SIT - ADSAM4/CTV-1a Flight Round I and T (WSMR)

(20142) SIT - ADSAM4/CTV-1a Dress Rehearsal and Flight Te

(15438) SIT - MRR (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)(15372) SIT - CTV-1 Flight Test

8/20

Program Milestone - Flight Test (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)8/28

(12860) AUR - Assemble IFTS (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)

(12861) AUR - IFTS Delivered (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)

(11373) G/S - SE Integration - ADSAM4/CTV-1a

(21654) SIT - ADSAM4/CTV-1a Flight Round I and T Data Rev

(20143) SIT - ADSAM4/CTV-1a Permit to Ship (PTS)(15437) SIT - MCP (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)

(20141) SIT - ADSAM4/CTV-1a WSMR DS/Range Intg. (IOM-2.2b

Critical Path

CPLI (FCA): 1.12

Schedule EV Baseline Execution Indices (BEI) as of April 09

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Task

Fin

ishe

s

0.000

0.100

0.200

0.300

0.400

0.500

0.600

0.700

0.800

0.900

1.000

1.100

1.200

Cum Completed by Status Date 4189 4262 4347 4433 4492 4552 4635 4744 4841 4927 5032 5113

Cum Sched. to Complete by Status Date 4261 4392 4474 4579 4672 4759 4837 4930 4992 5057 5129 5201

BEI 0.983 0.970 0.972 0.968 0.961 0.957 0.958 0.962 0.970 0.974 0.981 0.983

Monthly Hit Index 0.614 0.618 0.646 0.571 0.409 0.517 0.462 0.527 0.548 0.385 0.569 0.486

Nov 08Dec 08

Jan 09 Feb 09 Mar 09 Apr 09May 09

Jun 09 Jul 09 Aug 09 Sep 09 Oct 09


Summary

Diligent application of management processes (EV) produce significant benefits to the war fighter– Stable technical baseline - no scope creep

– Stable funding requirements

– Predictable Performance

– All major program milestones met on time

– 2 guided flights, 2 direct hits

On Time, On Budget Delivery of Warfighter CapabilityOn Time, On Budget Delivery of Warfighter Capability

kirk johnson (iws 3a sm pm) tim lardy (rms sm6 pm) 1 june 2009 standard missile 6 cooperative earned...

Documents