lab-on-chip diagnosis of bacterial vs viral conjunctivitis

11
Pinkeye Project Jin Wai Goh Xiaojun Sun Aloysius Davin Oetomo Scott Simmons

Upload: jinwai-goh

Post on 15-Apr-2017

92 views

Category:

Engineering


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lab-on-Chip Diagnosis of Bacterial vs Viral Conjunctivitis

Pinkeye Project

Jin Wai GohXiaojun Sun

Aloysius Davin OetomoScott Simmons

Page 2: Lab-on-Chip Diagnosis of Bacterial vs Viral Conjunctivitis

2

Background

• Pinkeye is caused by bacteria and viruses

• Current diagnosis methods are slow and require training

• Our design has these factors in mind:

– Deliver results in less than 24 hours

– Require minimal training

– Simple/inexpensive to manufacture

– Long shelf life

Page 3: Lab-on-Chip Diagnosis of Bacterial vs Viral Conjunctivitis

3

System Layout

Page 4: Lab-on-Chip Diagnosis of Bacterial vs Viral Conjunctivitis

4

Sample Collection

• Allow ~10 teardrops (~50 µL) to fall into a syringe

• Place syringe into syringe pump

• Connect syringe pump to the PinkeyeDetect device via PTFE tube

• Pump at a rate of 30 µL/hr

Page 5: Lab-on-Chip Diagnosis of Bacterial vs Viral Conjunctivitis

5

Simulation of Bacteria Separation

⟨FDEP⟩=πa3εmRe{K}∇|Erms|2

Frequency of the electric field 1000[kHz]"Fluid medium conductivity" 0.12 [S/m]"Fluid relative permittivity" 78"Fluid density" 1000[kg/m^3]"Fluid dynamic viscosity" 1e-3[Pa*s]"Particle density (RBCs and bacteria)" 1050[kg/m^3]"Particle diameter: bacteria (gram-positive)" 1.8[um]"Particle diameter: RBCs" 8 [um]"Particle conductivity: bacteria (gram-positive)" 0.25[S/m]"Particle conductivity: RBCs" 0.31[S/m]

"Particle relative permittivity: bacteria (gram-positive)" 20"Particle relative permittivity: RBCs" 59"Shell electrical conductivity:  bacteria (gram-positive)" 1e-6[S/m]"Shell electrical conductivity:  RBCs" 1e-6[S/m]"Shell relative permittivity: bacteria (gram-positive)" 6"Shell relative permittivity: RBCs" 4.44"Shell thickness: bacteria (gram-positive)" 4[nm]"Shell thickness: RBCs" 9[nm]

Page 6: Lab-on-Chip Diagnosis of Bacterial vs Viral Conjunctivitis

6

Electric Field and Velocity Profile

Page 7: Lab-on-Chip Diagnosis of Bacterial vs Viral Conjunctivitis

7

Cell Trajectory

Page 8: Lab-on-Chip Diagnosis of Bacterial vs Viral Conjunctivitis

8

Cell Culture Chamber

• Effective culture time Determine culture volume Depends on Co, substrate uptake rate, substrate diffusivity,

cell density, culture area + volume

• Fabricated through replica molding and photolithography.• PDMS was used because:

Non-toxic Gas permeable Excellent optical properties (low autofluorescence &

transparency)

• Bacteria inflow ~ 1.2X106 μm/s (require ~ 3X culture medium) Total volume ~ 4.8X106 μm/s 179μm x 179μm x 150μm (L x W x h)

Page 9: Lab-on-Chip Diagnosis of Bacterial vs Viral Conjunctivitis

9

Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB)

• 0.3g/mL beef extract• 0.0175 g/mL casamino acid• 0.0015 g/mL starch

• Non-selective (grow all bacteria present equally)• Starch absorbs toxins released from bacteria so it doesn’t interfere

with antibiotic testing• Loose agar better diffusion

Page 10: Lab-on-Chip Diagnosis of Bacterial vs Viral Conjunctivitis

10

TWIST Valves• Designed by Weibel et al. • Stainless steel screws bonded to PDMS channel• Elastic modulus PDMS (2.4 mPa; 360 psi)

Filling compartments produces pressure that later drives inflow/outflow of fluids. Hand-operated, cheap, seals chamber indefinitely.

Page 11: Lab-on-Chip Diagnosis of Bacterial vs Viral Conjunctivitis

11

Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing

• Based on SBM method

• Concentration gradient generated through mixing channels (low fluid resistance) that are sandwiched between resistance adjustment channels (high fluid resistance)

• Freeze-dried antibiotic matrix

• MIC determination in 3 hr