lannate® insecticide registration attributes lannate® compared to ops products reversibility...
TRANSCRIPT
Lannate® Insecticide
Registration
Attributes
Lannate® compared to OP’s products
Reversibility Studies in Rat
Mexican worker exposure
DuPont Safe Use Measures & Proposal
S
N
C
O
Methomyl Registration
Lannate has been commercialized since 1968 (USA)
Widely registered 80 countries approximately 190 crops (vegetables, fruits, fibers, and plantation
crops)
Variety of formulations available to meet local needs
No severe restrictions or bans based on risk assessment
Is not PIC listed
Insecticidal Attributes
Lannate is anti-acetyl cholinesterase, inhibiting nerve function
Broad spectrum of activity; controls >140 insect species
Fast acting, effective by contact & ingestion; also ovicidal activity
Not phytotoxic, systemic, translaminar
Excellent compatibility with commonly used pesticides
Resistance management tool and fits with IPM
Toxicology Attributes
Acute dermal toxicity is extremely low one of the primary attributes of methomyl 95% of worker exposure is potentially dermal
Acute oral and inhalation toxicity is high
exposure can be mitigated (masks)
Toxicity (acetyl cholinesterase inhibition) is quickly reversible without treatment carbamate insecticide property no delayed neurotoxicity in long term
Effective antidote is available (atropine)
Toxicology studies have shown that methomyl does not cause: developmental toxicity, reproductive toxicity, mutations, chronic toxicity, delayed neurotoxicity, carcinogenicity
Environmental Attributes
Rapid decomposition to natural molecules, no potential to bioaccumulate
Rapid degradation soil: 90% loss in 35 days, low mobility water: half life very short, hours to <7 days
Rapid metabolism plants: half life <3-5 days, short residual on crops, safe for
harvesters (PHI’s 1-7 days) and consumers animals: >50% metabolized or excreted in 24 hrs
Aquatic toxicity acutely toxic to invertebrates but exposure mitigated by label
precautions (no aquatic uses) low potential for chronic toxicity due to rapid degradation
Lannate® Vs. commonly used OP’s
Dermal and dietary safety in comparison to some OP insecticides:
Dermal LD50 ADI* (mg/kg) (ug/kg/day)
methomyl 5880 (rabbit) 30
methamidophos 118 (rabbit) 0.6
monocrotophos 354 (rabbit); 120 (rat) 0.6
demeton S methyl 30 (rat) 0.3
oxydemeton methyl 130 (rat) 0.3
mevinphos 16-33 (rabbit); 4-90 (rat) 1.3
*ADI = Acceptable Daily Intake values determined by JMPR
Time after dosing 30 min. 2 hours 3 hours 4 hoursClinical signs females + 0 0 0
males + 0 0 0
% cholinesterase inhib. vs. controls:Red Blood Cell (RBC) females 41* 0 0 0
males 55* 24* 3 2
Brain females 39* 8# 8# 0
males 46* 16* 8# 1
* = stat. signif icant
# = w ithin control group range
Lannate®: Rat Reversibility Study Results
Mexican Worker Exposure Study
Determine potential dermal and respiratory exposure to mixers, loaders, and applicators during use with backpack sprayers low (cauliflower) and medium (tomato) height crops 15 replicates (5 operators spraying on 3 separate occasions)
GIFAP recommended clothing worn outer cotton tunic and trousers with inner cotton underwear
(dosimeter f/dermal exposure) waterproof gloves with cotton undergloves (dosimeter f/hand
exposure) rubber boots, baseball caps & dust masks (dosimeter f/respiratory
exposure)
Mexican Worker Exposure Study :Summary of Findings
Outer clothing provides a high degree of protection from dermal exposure intercepting 83-93% of total methomyl residue
Respiratory exposure is very low (<0.1%)[dust mask]
Margins of safety for workers applying methomyl to a medium height crop (tomato) with appropriate PPE are: 206 for dermal exposure 3316 for respiratory exposure
Mexican Worker Exposure Study: Results
Measured Methomyl Residue on Backpack Sprayer Applicators
Cauiflower Tomato
Location Deposit(mg)
Percent ofTotal
Deposit(mg)
Percent ofTotal
Outer Suit 26.3 83.0 143.7 93.4
Inner Suit* 5.3 17 9.7 6.3
Face/NeckWipes
0.008 0.025 0.23 0.15
Inner Gloves 0.048 0.15 0.18 0.11
Respirator 0.03 0.095 0.13 0.08
* represents actual dermal exposure to the body
Tomate
Traje protector93.3%
Exposición dermal6.6%
Exposición respiratoria
<0.1%
Coliflor
Traje protector83%
Exposición respiratoria
<0.1%
Exposición dermal
17%
Methomyl residues
Mexican Worker Exposure Study: Results
Mexican Worker Exposure Study: Tomato Results
Route Exposure* NOEL MOS****
Dermal 0.437 mg/kg 90 mg/kg** 206 (sum of deposits on inner suit and gloves,
face, and neck)
Respiratory 0.0038 mg/kg 12.6 mg/kg*** 3316(deposit on respirator)
*based on a 70 kg person and adjusted to 6 and 4 hrs exposure for dermal and respiratory routes, respectively ** 21-day dermal study in rabbits (exposure 6 hrs/day) *** rat inhalation LC50 study (exposure 4 hrs; no mortality at 1.8 mg/L); assumes 100% absorption by a 0.25 kg rat with a respiration rate of 73 mL/min **** Margin of Safety = NOEL divided by exposure
DuPont Safe Use Measures
Use of dye (color)
New formulations with bittering agents (mal sabor) to prevent accidental ingestion
Use of constant flow valve for backpack sprays
Labelling with precautions and pictograms
Availability of atropine whenever needed
Safe use training programs
Packaging in water soluble bags for solids and high density plastic bottles for liquids; no large containers
DuPont’s proposal to authorities
Discontinue commercialization of liquid Lannate® New 1 oz presentation on WSB to avoid handlingTraining to medical department, to be able to tell
difference between acetyl cholinesterase symptoms and other (heat)
Continue training efforts on good use and Lannate ® management
On the last 3 years, 430 people were trained in El SalvadorAgricultores, cooperativas, Distribuidores:
dependientes de mostrador, Area de ventas, servicio tecnico, bodegueros.