lasalle units 1 and 2 ufsar, revision 22 and fire … · 2016. 9. 16. · lasalle units 1 and 2...
TRANSCRIPT
LaSalle UNITS 1 AND 2
UFSAR, REVISION 22
AND
FIRE PROTECTION REPORT (FPR), REVISION 7
THE SECURITY SENSITIVE INFORMATION HAS BEEN REDACTED
FROM THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT.
THIS DOCUMENT PROVIDES THE REDACTED VERSION.
THE REDACTED INFORMATION WITHIN THIS DOCUMENT
IS INDICATED BY SOLID BLACKEDOUT REGIONS.
•
•
SCALEo 40 Miles~I5_~;;;;;j.iiiiIb 50 Kilometers~ H
SITEo
.....
•LA SALLE COUNTY STATION
UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-1
LOCATION OF THE SITE WITHINTHE STATE OF ILLINOIS
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
•
•
Township
LA SALLE COUNTY
0. __ 8 16 24
Scale in Miles
¥
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-2
LOCATION OF THE SITE WITH RESPECT TOLA SALLE COUNTY AND BROOKFIELD TOWNSHIP
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
MAJOR STRUCTURES,ANT) Sll'J~ lAYOUT
LASALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANAI...YSIS REJ)O_R_T__~
. FIGURE 2.1 ..3
tr-. .M !fO 1000,.. -9SCAlf II 'rr,
\
I.
•
•
•I..ASALLE COUNTY STATION
UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-4
f:XCLUSION AREA
··v·-[J-·-0-···0···I I
" " " II
Interstate Hi.ghways
U.S. Highways
State Highwoys
County Hi ghways
Railroads
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-5
TRANSPORTATION ROUTESIN THE SITE VICINITY
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
N
s
FIGURE 2.1-6
0-10 MILE INSE T
1970 AND PROJECTED POPULATIONSWITHIN 50 MILES
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
EAST SECTOR1970- 639941980- 691911990- 759642000- 837462010- 923282020-101794
1910 9339071960 . 11054431990 - 12375142000 - 136.. 361.2010 - 150"2072020 . 165837'
TOTAL POPULA TlON DISTRIBUTIONo . 50 MilES
ESE SECTOR1970-465511980-"90291990-535142000-589952010-650402020-7 t 710
ENE SECTOR1970-114318'980~133e20
1990-149"662000-1647922010-181F782020-200290
40769..237246095508175602161766
SE SECTOR1970- 152551980-148641990~ 159152000-175-172010-193502020-Z 1333
HE SECTOR1910-20762'91980-2661481990~3294742000-3632312010-4004772020-4 4101512
7173683072698013683897-42
SSE SECTORUHO~135"O
tteo-13Ze."80·142562000~ '5720'OtO~1r332
aOto- Ut108
800lH seCTOR1810-23&7718aO-2.tti1"0-213222000-3012720'0"'332082020-3.'1.
SSW SECTOR1970-135631980-146371D90-160602000-1770820'O-19&2~
2020-21522
1174913146, ..5....160331167819..89
SW SECTOA1970-.'1211980-422771990-458112000"505762010-557582020~e1A70
wsw SECTOR1970-24"611880-2S4511990-216902000~30S26
2010-336592020-37109
NORTk SECTOR1970- 6e3911~60- 8662i
NNW SECTOR l~aO- 9866e NNE Sl::C-OFl
1970·11487 2000~108186 /:;rO-177101
lV80-,S<$S5 2010-119938 1980-2g928
UU~O-20H~1 2020 -132229 h,9C-24,B26
2000~222eO~'·G'>?666·2
2010-2454' 2010-293935
2020-21056 2020-324678
.'315
NW S£CTOR5130266054
1910~32·U3 72829 100446H~80~32e11 80295 12068519aO~36681 88524 1355252000,,39228 1494112010-43251 1647272020,-41681 181617
1177824600 114341.871 3476 2031225277 3486 2239395817 3760 2468916415 .,45 2121907011 4510
5038
91727919498918
WNW &ECTOR 9989 1117531e10~&_e22
10983 1232.001180~5e273
12112 135834UtOO-e'088 13352 1497552000-87346 14720
20'0-1.2&3 91413807
2020~818669823
55856498
10711 71631187413093
7898
,.434 8707
~ST SECTOR1810-216181980-2260119~O-2~627
2000-21 t'512010-289342020-33005
c..•.~..•••....•..•.•:·••.1'.
NNWSECTOR1975-541980-541990-58
2000-602010-612020-62
FIGURE 2. 1-7
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
PRESENT (1975) AND PROJECTEDPOPULATIONS
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
TOTAL POPUlAliONo - 5 MILES
1975 - 1106
1980 - 1081
1990 - 1165
2000 - 12042010 - 12432020 - 1273
EASTSECTOR1975-461980-471990-502000-512010-522020-55
ESESECTOR1975-411980-411990-452000-,472010-472020-48
ENESECTOR1975~25
1980-251990-282000-2820 1O~292020-30
NESECTOR1975,3621980-3101990-4022000-4142010-4202020-425
331339368379384388
/
222224252626
1313141515 1615 179
191019 SE1120 SECTOR11
11 20 1975-3811 1980-39
25 1990-4330 2000-4434 2010-4533 2020-463232 SSE
SECTOR1975-431980-491990-552000-542010-532020-54
9910101011
t'.f __
SlCTOR1975-541980-551990-602000-622010-632020-64
161618181919
SOUTH SECTOR1975-381980-421990-482000-462010-472020-47
NORTH SECTOR1975-91980-91990-102000-102010-102020-11
131213131414
131314151515
313234353636
991010101 1
161212141516
SSWSECTOR1975-561980-611990-682000-542010-672020-68
594645535760
655566
565559646464
NWSECTOR1975-1241980-1101990-1142000- 1272010-1312020-135
131010121213
SWSECTOR1975-341980-281990-262000-322010-342020-36
WNWSECTOR1975-541980-451990-462000-522010-542020-57
wswSECTOR1975-621980--521990-542000-592010-642020-66
WESTSECTOR1975-671980-541990-552000-642010-662020-69
•
5 /0 Miles.'_==--=::::J_IIt'==::=:========::j1° 5 /0 Kilometers.
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
. FI GURE 2. 1-8
CITIES WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE SITE
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
FIGURE 2.1-9
,REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
25 Miles, ,
30 Kilometersj
SCALE
PRESENT AND PROJECTED POPULATIONCENTERS WITHIN 50 HILES OF THE SlTE
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
o 10~_ ......
Note:For details of populationcenters, see Table 2.1-7.
o 55- ...
1~!!!l~~~~~iIiiiiiii~~1o -5 Ki lometersl~5iiiiiiiiit."!!!!5iiiiiiiiiil!!!!!!t
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-10
TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND TRANSPORTATIONROUTES WITHIN THE LPZ
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
zo~..oJ:::> 10a.o0..
A
oAa
o
a
1980
oo
oo&
LEGENDo Na NN E6. NEo ENE
Curve based on SOO people/sq. mile
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-111980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN
50 MILES OF THE SITE(SHEET 1 of 4)
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
zo~..oJ:::> 10a.o0..
A
oAa
o
a
1980
oo
oo&
LEGENDo Na NN E6. NEo ENE
Curve based on SOO people/sq. mile
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-111980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN
50 MILES OF THE SITE(SHEET 1 of 4)
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
1980
t Aa
z <>0 8~..J::::> 10Q.0 iQ.
a
LEGENDo Ea ESE6 SE<> SSE
Curve based on 500 peoplelsq. mile
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-111980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN
50 MILES OF THE SITE(SHEET 2 of 4)
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
1980
t Aa
z <>0 8~..J::::> 10Q.0 iQ.
a
LEGENDo Ea ESE6 SE<> SSE
Curve based on 500 peoplelsq. mile
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-111980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN
50 MILES OF THE SITE(SHEET 2 of 4)
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
1980
AA A e
00 <> a
a<>a
z0
~..J:::> 100..0a.. Q
<>
LEGENDo sa ssw4 sw<> wsw
Curve baled on eoo people/sq. mile
o'--........-.r..---.L.---I'--..L.--£---"'----L_.l..--..&.__~ 10 20 30 40 50
MILES
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2. 1-111980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN
50 MILES OF THE SITE(SHEET 3 of 4)
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
1980
AA A e
00 <> a
a<>a
z0
~..J:::> 100..0a.. Q
<>
LEGENDo sa ssw4 sw<> wsw
Curve baled on eoo people/sq. mile
o'--........-.r..---.L.---I'--..L.--£---"'----A._.l..--..&.__~ 10 20 30 40 50
MILES
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2. 1-111980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN
50 MILES OF THE SITE(SHEET 3 of 4)
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
1980
aa a
6 6
6 6 8 8a 8<>
z 00
~ 6.J::::> 10 aa..0 0a..
LEGENDo Wa WNWA NW<> NNW
Curve based on 500 people/sq. mile
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-111980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN
50 MILES OF THE SITE(SHEET 4 of 4)
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
1980
aa a
6 6
6 6 8 8a 8<>
z 00
~ 6.J::::> 10 aa..0 0a..
LEGENDo Wa WNWA NW<> NNW
Curve based on 500 people/sq. mile
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-111980 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN
50 MILES OF THE SITE(SHEET 4 of 4)
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
2020
Curve based on 1000 people/sq. mile
NNNENEEN E
LEGENDoaA<>
00
8i0
z 0 a0 A~..J a:;) 10Q.0Q.
A
<>
5 10
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-122020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN
50 MILES OF THE SITE(SHEET 1 of 4)
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
2020
Curve based on 1000 people/sq. mile
NNNENEEN E
LEGENDoaA<>
00
8i0
z 0 a0 A~..J a:;) 10Q.0Q.
A
<>
5 10
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-122020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN
50 MILES OF THE SITE(SHEET 1 of 4)
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
LEGENDo Ea ESE• SE<> SSE
2020
Curve based" on 1000 people/sq. mile
,
0a
00
&,. ,.6 a
<>z 80
~-J:::) 10 9a.00... e
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-122020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN
50 MILES OF THE SITE(SHEET 2 of 4)
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
LEGENDo Ea ESE• SE<> SSE
2020
Curve based" on 1000 people/sq. mile
,
0a
00
&,. ,.6 a
<>z 80
~-J:::) 10 9a.00... e
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-122020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN
50 MILES OF THE SITE(SHEET 2 of 4)
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
2020
Curve based on 1000 people/sq. mile
LEGENDo sa ssw6 sw<> wsw
I
I 6z0
~4
..J:::> 10 aa..0CL.
<>
e
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE' 2.1-122020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN
50 MILES OF THE SITE(SHEET 3 of 4)
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
2020
Curve based on 1000 people/sq. mile
LEGENDo sa ssw6 sw<> wsw
I
I 6z0
~4
..J:::> 10 aa..0CL.
<>
e
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE' 2.1-122020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN
50 MILES OF THE SITE(SHEET 3 of 4)
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
LEGENDo wa WNWA NW .
<> NNW
Curve based on 1000 people/sq. m",le
2020
A
8
a Da
.6 A
8A .6 8a 8<>
<> 0
z A0
~ a..J 0:::) toa..~
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-122020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN
50 MILES OF THE SITE(SHEET 4 of 4)
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
LEGENDo wa WNWA NW .
<> NNW
Curve based on 1000 people/sq. m",le
2020
A
8
a Da
.6 A
8A .6 8a 8<>
<> 0
z A0
~ a..J 0:::) toa..~
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-122020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN
50 MILES OF THE SITE(SHEET 4 of 4)
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
•
•
•
01.-
I
0 10 20 KilometersP- M
,LEGENDAirports
o No paved runway
® No paved runway(Restricted use)
<> Hard surface runway
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.2-1
AIRPORTS AND FLIGHT PATTERNS WITHIN20 MILES OF THE SITE
REV. 2 - APRIL 1986
•
•
•
01.-
I
0 10 20 KilometersP- M
,LEGENDAirports
o No paved runway
® No paved runway(Restricted use)
<> Hard surface runway
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.2-1
AIRPORTS AND FLIGHT PATTERNS WITHIN20 MILES OF THE SITE
REV. 2 - APRIL 1986
SCALE
-- - ! o I - - - ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiijji 0
Mi les
LEGEND
- Natural Gas Pipeline ._-- Refined Products Pipeline
(gasoline, kerosene, a LPG) •• _ •. Crude Oil Pipeline ••••••••. Diluent Pipeline
~ MILITARY FACILITIES
LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.2-2 MILITARY FACILITIES AND
GAS PIPELINES WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE SITE
REV. 18 - APRIL 2010
i I I ~
I I i I
I I i I :
~D:VlESS • •m....£"SON ""£BAG I• 3 3 5I
NO. OF TORNADOES CARROLl OGlE DE• 8 6PER COUNTY (1916-1969) KALB
54YEAR PERIOD WHITESIDE LEE 36 6
BUREAU5
5
4
LA SALLE
oSIT
LIVINGSTON5
VERMILION.......- ......19
CHRISTIAN
8 FAYETTE EFFINGHAM JASPER2 7 4-
CLAYMARION 22
WAYNEJEFFERSON 2
8
Scale of Mileso 20 40 60 80 100, .II,~=:lli!!!!!!!!!!!lt:'=::::i'__li:'=::::::ll
UNION• 4
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-1NUMBER OF TORNADOES PER COUNTY
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
~D:VlESS • •m....£"SON ""£BAG I• 3 3 5I
NO. OF TORNADOES CARROLl OGlE DE• 8 6PER COUNTY (1916-1969) KALB
54YEAR PERIOD WHITESIDE LEE 36 6
BUREAU5
5
4
LA SALLE
oSIT
LIVINGSTON5
VERMILION.......- ......19
CHRISTIAN
8 FAYETTE EFFINGHAM JASPER2 7 4-
CLAYMARION 22
WAYNEJEFFERSON 2
8
Scale of Mileso 20 40 60 80 100, .II,~=:lli!!!!!!!!!!!lt:'=::::i'__li:'=::::::ll
UNION• 4
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-1NUMBER OF TORNADOES PER COUNTY
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
Nr
w-
IS
0.26- . 3.01-8 1.50 7.00 .CALM· i IIIIUIIIC,tW'.
1.51- > 7.03.00
MPS
NOTE:ANNUAL VALUES BASED ONDATA COLLECTED OCTOBER 1.1976THROUGH S;'PTEMBER 30.1978
- E
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-2
ANNUAL WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL
REV. 0 - APRIL 198
Nr
w-
IS
0.26- . 3.01-8 1.50 7.00 .CALM· i IIIIUIIIC,tW'.
1.51- > 7.03.00
MPS
NOTE:ANNUAL VALUES BASED ONDATA COLLECTED OCTOBER 1.1976THROUGH S;'PTEMBER 30.1978
- E
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-2
ANNUAL WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL
REV. 0 - APRIL 198
NNW
w-
wsw
Ni
IS
NNE
SSE
NE
ENE
- E
J•
0.26- 3.01-8 1.50 7.00 .CALM I IIIUllllf;;:;ZM4Jd1.51- =- 7.03.00
MPS
,..-----------------,LA SALLE COUNTY STATION IUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT,
FIGURE 2.3-3OCTOBER 1976 AND OCTOBER 1977
WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
NNW
w-
wsw
Ni
IS
NNE
SSE
NE
ENE
- E
J•
0.26- 3.01-8 1.50 7.00 .CALM I IIIUllllf;;:;ZM_1.51- =- 7.03.00
MPS
,..-----------------,LA SALLE COUNTY STATION IUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT,
FIGURE 2.3-3OCTOBER 1976 AND OCTOBER 1977
WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
0.2:6,- 3.01-
8ALM 1.50 I SI~il~~I""C;4.-.:!*"'+"'<'~.. 1.51- . > :".0
3.00-MPS
N,
IS
- E
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-4
NOVEMBER 1976 AND NOVEMBER 1977WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
0.2:6,- 3.01-
8ALM 1.50 I SI~il~~I""C;4.-.:!*"'+"'<'~.. 1.51- . > :".0
3.00-MPS
N,
IS
- E
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-4
NOVEMBER 1976 AND NOVEMBER 1977WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
·NNW
NW
WNW12.95
w~...-........14.32
WSW11.23
sw
ssw
0.26 - 3.01-
8 1.50 7.00CALM ·~--C:=:::JnIlIIlIlG1!'JIII-"'!I$~·,*;~::I·3
1.51.- ;> 7.03.00
MPS
NI
s
NNE
NE
ENE
- E
ESE
SE
LA SALl.:E COUNTY STAT:ONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-5DECEMBER 1976 AND DECEMBER 1977
WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVELL- -:-~~~-.----
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
·NNW
NW
WNW12.95
w~...-........14.32
WSW11.23
sw
ssw
0.26 - 3.01-
8 1.50 7.00CALM ·~--C:=:::JnIlIIlIlG1!'JIII-"'!I$~·,*;~::I·3
1.51.- ;> 7.03.00
MPS
NI
s
NNE
NE
ENE
- E
ESE
SE
LA SALl.:E COUNTY STAT:ONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-5DECEMBER 1976 AND DECEMBER 1977
WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVELL- -:-~~~-.----
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
WNW
0.26- 3.01-8 1.50 7.00CALM I. Jlllllnll:·;:Z;,@U
1.51- > 7.03.00
UPS
NI
IS
- E
LA SAL~E COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-6
JANUARY 1977 AND JANUARY 1978WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
WNW
0.26- 3.01-8 1.50 7.00CALM I. JIIIIIIUI:·;:Z;,@U
1.51- > 7.03.00
UPS
NI
IS
- E
LA SAL~E COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-6
JANUARY 1977 AND JANUARY 1978WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
0.26- 3.01-e 1.50 7.00 .CA LM 1 111IIIJII tfMk·:{$I
. 1 .5. 1 ... > 7.0. 3.00
MPS
NI
- E
LA SALL.E COUNTY STATION. UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-7 t
FEBRUARY 1977 AND FEBRUARY 1978JWIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL
._----REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
0.26- 3.01-e 1.50 7.00 .CA LM 1 111IIIJII tfMk·:{$I
. 1 .5. 1 ... > 7.0. 3.00
MPS
NI
- E
LA SALL.E COUNTY STATION. UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-7 t
FEBRUARY 1977 AND FEBRUARY 1978JWIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL
._----REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
w-
0.26- 3.01-
8 1:.50 7.00CALM '---(1==:::lIJnJnUlJlJJ.!lllC!-f::':;'~""".1!:=-Z:}:-::3;••'
1.51- ;> 1.03.00
MPS
N
IS
- E
LA 5<ALLE COUNTY STATION.UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-8
MARCH 1977 AND MARCH 1978WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LE;EL
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
w-
0.26- 3.01-
8 1:.50 7.00CALM '---(1==:::lIJnJnUlJlJJ.!lllC!-f::':;'~""".1!:=-Z:}:-::3;••'
1.51- ;> 1.03.00
MPS
N
IS
- E
LA 5<ALLE COUNTY STATION.UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-8
MARCH 1977 AND MARCH 1978WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LE;EL
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
NNW
NW
WNW
w -
WSW
sw
ssw
8.026- 3.01-1.50 7.00
CALM I . UIJUUllflI:"'!C+""""c-:··-:ar.-1.51- :> 7.03.00
MPS
N
s
NNE
NE
ENE
- E
ESE
SE
SSE
LA SALLE COUNTY STATiON fUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT i
FIGURE 2.3-9
APRIL 1977 AND APRIL 1978WIND ROSE 37S-FOOT LE'~
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
NNW
NW
WNW
w -
WSW
sw
ssw
8.026- 3.01-1.50 7.00
CALM I . UIJUUllflI:"'!C+""""c-:··-:ar.-1.51- :> 7.03.00
MPS
N
s
NNE
NE
ENE
- E
ESE
SE
SSE
LA SALLE COUNTY STATiON fUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT i
FIGURE 2.3-9
APRIL 1977 AND APRIL 1978WIND ROSE 37S-FOOT LE'~
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
w-
0.26- 3.01-8 1.50 7.00CAL~ , nIiIIIiIrb:t:'~L~JMI
, 1.51- > 7.03.00
MPS
N
- E
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-10
MAY 1977 AND MAY 1978WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
w-
0.26- 3.01-8 1.50 7.00CAL~ , nIiIIIiIrb:t:'~L~JU1
, 1.51- > 7.03.00
MPS
N
- E
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-10
MAY 1977 AND MAY 1978WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
w-
0.26- 3.01-e 1.50 7.00CALM ~ I '111111111: t: ,::JI
1.51- > 7.03.00 '
MPS
NI
- E
LA SALLE COUNTY STAT!ON IUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-11 ~JUNE 1977 AND JUNE 1978 ,I,
WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVELI
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
NNW
NW
WNW
w-
wsw
sw
.026- 3.0'-8 1.50 7.00CALM I aunnu::::¥£.SG
1.51- :> 7.03.00
MPS
N
s
NNE
NE
ENE
-e
ESE
SE
SSE
LA SALLJ=: COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-12
JULY 1977 AND JULY 1978WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
- -- -------------. - c·_ ..~·__ "
NNW
WNW
w-
wsw
sw
0.26- 3.01-e 1.50 7.00CALM I IIJUIIJlEt.:::::;;3
1.51-_ :> 7.03.00
MPS
NNNE
NE
ENE
-E
ESE
SE
11.05S
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-13
AUGUST 1977 AND AUGUST 1978WINO ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL
a..-.....-------R~E~V~.~O-- ~A~P~R~I:"="L~1~9 8~4
w-
0.28- 3.01-
8A L M 1.50 I I~J;li~i~U ·:::SCJ£.
1.51- > 1.03.00
MPS
NI
-E
s
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-14
SEPTEr·mER 1977 AND SEPTEt1BER 1978WIND ROSE 375-FOOT LEVEL
L.. ~~~~~~~JREV. 0 - APRIL 1984
"I.A'fT QIIIAOI I!L. , 10' -0"
100e ,. 100
100100..... 100
.00100... 10C:
.00100....100
100100
• 100
100100U. 100
100100
• .00
100100
••• .00
~ 100 1II0AO-IIIIII 100~ • 100""':r:! 100III 11I0"0:It 100
••• 100
e 100100
•• 100
'00too I!K 1II0AO
••• 100
100100 IItOAO
• 100
100 iii AD100 III0AO.... 100
100 11I0"0
"W 100
100TOO _III0AO -
N"W 100
100
OISTANCI U~,.. ISI
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL ·SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-15
TOPOGRAPHIC PROFILES OF THE AREA 0 TO5 MILES FROM THE LA SALLE COUNTY STATIon
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
,.I,.AlfT (U"'O. IL.. rIO" 0"
10100
"OA~~It lOa
100100
NN. lOa
lOa100
.N'CANAl,.
lOa"."..
toO100....lao
lao100 CIIlIIK
/lao
lOa"OAO CI'IIK100 A.Ill. /
~... lOa
100100 C"IEK 7
II 100
lOa100 .....- AOAD CRUIK \ / "OAD
U. lao
100A ". AD '" A100
AOAO.~ laos! lOa! 100 ROAD CAllI(... lao
100100 "'OAO AOAO~
CII.IK
•• lOa
lOa100
••w
lao100
R.A •• 100
100100
WNW 100
lao100
HW 100
100100
NN. lao
lao
D'STAMCI (~II"111
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL-SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.3-16
TOPOGRAPHIC PROFILES OF THE AREA 5 TO 10MIL ES FRO~1 THE I A S.4 I lE COUNTY ST.4TIO~:
....... ---------------------~REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
10 MilesJo,~.C::l.IBI.II::JMiI·"=~~K i Iometers
5
l
-----Y--:S::T~AT iONr' LA SALLE ~~E~~rNALYSIS REPORT ..I UPDATED_F_~f_JA_L_________ :
7 tFIGURE 2.3-1 "
Q MT I C ~r-u T"l .:1. 1· -. I. l.. - 'fJ:"~ATURES ~~ 1'0' ;.~.~'1 5TATI C'l ITOPOGRAPHIS'J~'"LA SALLl:. C v"AlpRIL 1984 rRADI US OF i ~.'- REV.
REV.
o, 10 MilesI----
10 KilometersI
TY STATIONLA SALLE ~OF~T~ ANALYS IS REPORTUPDATED FINAL SA
FIGURE 2.4-1
SITE LOCATION PLAN
o - APRIL 198
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-2
HYDROSPHERE
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
F
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
:,
F
SURFACE WATER WITHIN A 5-MILE RADIUS OF THE PLANT SITE
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
°0 FIGURE 2.4- 3
GENERAL SITE PLAN
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
•
2000 0LiI rl
FEET2000 4000
; ;6000,
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-4
DRAINAGE AREA
REV. 0 - APRIL 1~
320300
I-0:::o~Q..o
280260240220140 160 180 200RIVER MILES ABOVE GRAFTON, ILLINOIS
12010080604020
g3 I I ~ ¥ (!)
-' H.W.+5.7 L.W.Df~Oz-I--. r-1'----- .J-
fLO~PORiPOOL(Illa olzg~ ze
-I<DCL':o .J_-Ix
~d5~
..to0-O~ ~ UJ. 2~9 cll&.la: ,~
il~cDBRANDON ROAD POOL ./ UJ..J
r-- - IQ-J ~2«z .!1~40 ZescD
~~ /~ (1)0
:1-9 1-' V~ ~ DRESDEN iSLAND poo':,jdS..J ,..-;-r~--:d ' II
I g ~»: /' I...J G: / •~----.-,- i -, I hJi MARS~'=!..S_P..29U /0
1/II: UJ
"" ! ~ ./ ....-~ :2 c~
"-~Q ~ //0: -c(/) ,.
f.0 dS /(f)~ 1943 HIGH WATER" STARVE 0 ROC K POOL I(IS ~-0. U_s- _....--
..-- - .. _, ..!LLINOIS_ ~ pLAJt£$ _CHICAGO SANITARY_0- 1-----zt'n ¥ ~--- I-0 0
--I -- RIVER RIVER ,- - SHIP CANAL -...J- 9 ~---- I-J<n ---- c(-'" I1--"'-"- 0:
A )
.. i------_.~ 0 I ~I~~% ~-- ... L&JZ 0.. PEORIA POOL j t=J::lt-f-
~ .-~-----J\j~ ~o~~ -----~ I
10-- --<.!)
f (1)1 x )..OW WAlkER DATUM (,L.W.OJ(.!) ~---- :3 LA GRANGE P~OL I >Iz FOR LAKE MJCHIGA••i= .... w _~- -- ~---~--- rvvV ZIUl =576.8 rNTI~RNAT'ONAL
u
~ / ::) crzr' A 01° GREAT LAKES DATUM (I.G.L.D.);:)..., ALTON POOL r--_ o ·(/) (I,...- ---,.....---- J ~ ..-.J \I··\r-.j witt:
~ -'JWTHALWEG -J>~iX
~~'r- «~
-'tv-----~ II._'----_.'_._-390
o
~90
580
510
~60
~50
540
..; e300«<ft 520N(ft
..Jera
<n2
500to-LL
490~
480enz0 470....c>w 460.Jw
480
440
430
420
410
400
SOURCE: REFERENCE 2.4- ILA SALLE COUNTY STATION
UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-5
ILLINOIS WATERWAY PROFILE
REV. 0 - APRIL 1914
LSCS - UFSAR
Rev. 14, APRIL 2002
800 r-------,--------r------.-----.,------.,-------,
6543
TIME IN HOURS
2
--0+---- 768 CFS (USED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OFI FLOOD HYDR7GRAPHS) IREFERENCE 71. FOR COMPARISON ONLY}
600 I-----if---+--+-I--+---+-----+-----+-----l------l
700 +---~-......-~ ----+------+-----+------+-------1
500
(I)l.L.0
~ 400l.L.l.L.0Z:::>a:
300
I200
I100
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-7
15-MINUTE UNIT HYDROGRAPHS
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
• • •
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANAlYSIS REPORT
104 -JUl~
.-L&Jl&Ju..
103 ~
.JbJ>I.&J-J
702 a:t.LI.-c:(~..J..Ji=
701 U)
w:I':cf-J
700
250200150100·50
l43,880 CF S, PEAK P tie fr
704.3 FT. MSL MAXIMU.. LAKE LEVELr,\. ..\.
"
'.' .., ........................r
lLAK[ SnLLW4TER LEVEl WITH
"""-.. ..--...,oo-'T. LONG AU.ILlA,V SPILLWAY
..........._.....(~REST ELEVATION 702.1 fT. MSL)
..-"- L /l " ....... , , I
i "-..--...--,..-"--"'--'
.1, / ..~ ..""'"!I!
.'/',-... .......... .,.,
t7,760 CFS, PEAK SPF r+-PW, HYORGGR"PH
r---~SPF "'fOR06RAPH
~ l J \r-"\. ..-.r-L..~
10
oo
15
30
40
I.&Jto!)ex 20c:(J:UUl(5
TIME IN HOURS FIGURE 2.4-8HYDROGRAPH OF PMF WITH ANTECEDENT SPFMIl VARIATION Of LAKE lEVEL WITH TIME~-------------_ ....REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
• • •
------AREA
----- CAPACITY
ELEVATiON AREA CAPACITY(fEET MSL) (ACRES) (ACRE- FEET)
610 15 20
680 512 1883
690 1537 132 U
700 20&8 31106
702 2162 35926
103 219~ 38t04
704 2248 40332
106 2295 44875
o500IN ACRE S
lOOO
AREA150020002500
" ~. V\
/\\\ /\V
~
/ \~
V ~
V \,/' \~ ,
V \\
/ \ ,,V ",
/ ...~,
'"".i/ -'ro-,
" \.\.".;,
"\\
685
67
705
710
670
700
680
-Jen~
t- 695wwl.L
z 690ot-ea:>w-oJW
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAl SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
665o 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000CAPACiTY IN ACRE-FEET
35000 40000 45000
fIGURE 2.4-9
AREA AND CAPACITY OF LAKE
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
• • •
RATE OF fLOW IN CFSELEVATION THROUGH THROUGH(fEETMSU ~~~lta:,~ ~~RVlCE TOTAL
lLLWAY100.0 0 t80 180101.0 0 leO l80
702.0 0 180 180702.5 0 180 t80103.0 314 l82 496704.0 1661 182 1849
--f-106.0 6175 183 6358"---
f I ~VI /~",""t---OlSCHARGE THROUGH ~I SERVICE SPILLWAY .,,"i l ... ",'"
I OISCHARL THROU6H .......~.I· AUXIUARY SPILLWAY ~,."
';"':::"'-TOT AL
i· .., '" IHSOtARGE~",.
705
706
0::5 702~1-----.J------+-----l------i------I-------II--------t
>0:LUUlLU0:
..JCIl:Et- 704LUwU.
~
Zo 703
~w..JLU
701
70003000 4000 5000DtSCHARGE IN C.F. S.
2000100 --...'----_.__-L__-__-J. ---l~ .l__ ..L_ ...J_ ......
o 1000
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-10
OUTFLOW RATING
REV. 0 - APRIL 1994
o 4900SCALE: FT. LA SALLE COUNTY STATION
UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT+.... -
FIGURE 2.4-11
PLAN OF AUXILIARY SPILLWAY
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
• • •
SC4lE IN FEET
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-12
CENTERlINE SECTION OFAUXILIARY SPILLWAY
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
• • •
SECTION A-A 10 8 6 4 2 0 10,...,.,-...-SCALE IN FEET
20i
LA SALLE COUNTY STATtONUPDATED FINAL SAfETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-12a
CEHlERt'HE SECTION OFAUXILIARY SPILLWAY
(t-tOOIFIEO)REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
••
•tOF
AUXILIAR
YSP
ILLW
AY(STA
.346
+001
_----
700'
685'
695'
690'
EL.70
5'
c: -0 or
~>
r-~(I)
0.,,>
»2
c:en
......-tr
><.....
.zr
......-t"
~P1
r-e
............0
en(,/)·n
:r:a......
c=;::oz
::c~O
-<)::II
fT1
r-""e
Ul
N~z
-a(/').
......
fT1
~~-t
r-n
I,-t
.....z-<
:E.t-t
w::t:-
»0
r(J)
-<:z
-<-t
a~~
"Vl-t
~6
~z
;:0 -I
o ~ to ~ H ~ ......
\0 00 ~~ t%j <: .
•
FIGURE 2.4-13a
SERVICE SPILLWAY PLANSCALE FEET
8 4 0 4 8 12 16t'""""""I MijMPLAN•
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
•
•SECTION F-F
8 4 0 4 8 f2 16~
SCALE FEE T
UNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-13b
SERVICE SPILLWAY SECTIONS
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
(1.3)A'
(2.0)G,
(2.3)F2
(2.3) FI
2000 1000 0 2000i i
SCALE IN FEET
(0.6) c'
(1.4)C,
(2.8)F ~~~(2-.48)~E-,~~(-a~9~)E~~~-~-.48)~D-2~~-(-a42)~D~(2~)C2
•( ) FREEBOARD REQUIRED IN FEET
FOR 40MPH SUSTAINED OVERLANDWINOS IN MOST CRITICAL DIRECTION
LA SALLE; COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-14
FREEBOARD REQUIREMENTS
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
705.7'
4000
FEET
o 2000
SCALE
! 705.7'
LEGEND
!TOP OF 81KE/TOP OF ROADt~IO N LELEVAn N ;'1:LEVATION
2 +00 1705,0 I ! 705 7 I
22+00 ! 706.0' I 706.7'
82+00 ! 706.0' /706.7'
99+00 /706.S' I 707.3 t
202+00/705. O' I 705.7'195+00/706.0' I 706.7'
1173+00 /706.0' /706.7'
707. 3~
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-15
TOP-OF-DIKE AND TOP-OF-ROADELEVATIONS
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
2 + 00 1105,0 1 / 105 7 1
• 22+00 / 106.0' I 706.7'
82+00 ! 106.0' /706.7'
99+00 /706.S' I 707.3 1
105.7'
/705.7'
LEGEND
!TOP OF 81KE/TOP OF ROAD t ~IO N LELEVAn N ~LEVATION
o 2000 4000
SCALE FEET
202+00/705.0' I 705.7'
195+00/706.0' I 106.7'
1173+00 /706.0' 1706.7'
707. 3~
LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-15
TOP-OF-DIKE AND TOP-OF-ROAD ELEVATIONS
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
•
2 + 00 /705 0' / 705 7 '
• 22+00 / 706.0' / 706.7'
82+00 /706.0' /706.7'
99+00 /706.6' / 707.3'
•
347+81.7 705.7'
344+18.3/705.0' /705.7'
LEGEND
ITOP OF 8IKE/lOP OF ROAD t ~IO N LELEVATI N LELEVATION
o 2000 4000
SCALE FEET
202+00/705.0' /705.7'
195+00/706.0' / 706.7'
1,73+00 /706.0' /706.7'
707. 3~
LA SALLE COU NTY STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-15
TOP-OF-OIKE AND TOP-OF-ROAD ELEVATIONS
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
NOTES
LEGEND
• Public ground water supplywithin 10miles
5,Scale in Miles
a.. '5
'-
FIGURE 2.4-16
MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL GROUNDWATERUSE WITHI~ 25 MILES
2. Data for major municipal andindustrial pumping centerswithin the regional area orepresented in Table 2.4-13.
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
l Data for public ground watersupplies within 10 miles arepresented in Table 2 _4 -14.
3. Base map modified from USGSt
I: 250.000 series (topoqraphic).Aurora, Jllinois (Nt< 16 -7) J 1958,and Peorio) Illinois (NK 16-10).1958 (limited revision 1968).
, Major municipal or industrialpumping center
•REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
REV. 0 – APRIL 1984
SYSTEM SERIES GROUP OR FORMATION
HYDROGEOLOGIC UNIT
DESCRIPTION HYDROGEOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS
Richland Loess
Glacial Drift Aquitard
Silty clay or clayey silt ______________________ Silty clay or clayey silt with interspersed sand and gravel, some thin sand and gravel pockets
Ground water occurs predominantly in thin sand and gravel pockets within the glacial drift. Yields are quite variable and typically low, suitable only for domestic and farm purposes. Wells or cisterns that intersect the more permeable zones may exhibit high, short-term yields. The glacial drift aquitard locally overlies the buried bedrock valley aquifers.
Wedron Formation
QU
AR
TE
RN
AR
Y
Pleistocene
Buried Bedrock Valley Aquifers
Sand and gravel, some silt
The buried bedrock valley aquifers consist of sand and gravel deposited in channels cut into the underlying Pennsylvanian strata. Ground water occurs under water table conditions. Where the glaciofluvial deposits are clean and well-sorted, yields of 100 gpm or more can be sustained.
Missourian Modesto Formation Carbondale Formation
Desmoinesian Spoon Formation
PE
NN
SY
LV
AN
IAN
Atokan Abott Formation
Pennsylvanian Aquitard
Principally shale, with some interbedded under-clay, sandstone, lime-stone, and coal
Ground water occurs primarily in thin sandstone beds and occasionally in joints in thin limestone beds. Ground water occurs under leaky artesian conditions. The high proportion of shales make the Pennsylvanian strata generally unfavorable as aquifers. Yields are low and are suitable only for domestic and farm purposes.
Galena Group Platteville Group
Galena- Platteville dolomites
Dolomite and limestone, locally cherty, sandy at base, shale partings
Champlainian
Ancell Group
Glenwood- St. Peter sandstone
Sandstone, shale at top, little dolomite, locally cherty at base
OR
DO
VIC
IAN
Canadian Prairie du Chien Group
Eminence Formation Potosi Dolomite Franconia Formation
Prairie du Chien, Eminence, Potosi, and Franconia dolomites
Sandy dolomite, dolomitic sandstone, cherty at top, inter-bedded shale in lower part
Ironton Sandstone Galesville Sandstone
Ironton- Galesville sandstone
Cam
bria
n-O
rdov
icia
n A
quif
er
Sandstone, upper part dolomite
Ground water occurs under leaky artesian conditions in the sandstones and in joints in the dolomites. Yields are variable and depend upon which units are open to the well. In terms of the total yield of a well penetrating the entire thickness of the Cambrian-Ordovician Aquifer, the Glenwood-St. Peter sandstone supplies about 15 percent, the Prairie du Chien, Eminence, Potosi, and Franconia dolomites collectively supply about 35 percent, and the Ironton-Galesville sandstone supplies about 50 percent.
Eau Claire Aquitard (upper and middle beds)
Shales, dolomites, and shaly dolomitic sandstone
Insignificant amounts of ground water may occur in joints. These beds act as a confining layer between the Cambrian-Ordovician Aquifer and the Mt. Simon Aquifer.
Eau Claire Formation
CA
MB
RIA
N
Croixan
Mt. Simon Sandstone
Mt. Simon Aquifer Sandstone
Ground water occurs under leaky artesian conditions. Ground water in this aquifer is too highly mineralized for most purposes. Adequate supplies for municipal and industrial use are more easily obtained from shallower aquifers.
LA SALLE COUNTY STATION NOTE UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS
REPORT 1. Modified from Willman et al., 1975; Hoover and
Schicht, 1967, p. 4; and Csallany, 1966, p. 4 FIGURE 2.4-17
SITE STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS AND THEIR HYDROGEOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS
5 0 5 10••1::11-11::1*'-=====::1.__iii'Scole in Miles
ContDur interval is 50 feet.
Ground water within the area of diversion flowstoward pumping centers aloug the Illinois River.
Elevation of Illinois River at Marseilles Damis 483.25 feet MSL.
2.
3. Datum is mean sea level.
5.
4.
NOTESJ. Modified from Hoover and Schichf,1967,p.l6, Figure 24.
LEGEND__ 450 _ Potentiometric surface contour,
Cambrian - Ordovician Aquifer, Fall, 1963.
_ ______.. Boundary of area of diversion due toground water withdrawals.
T38N
T39N
T37N
1 T32N
I T36N
I R 5EI R4EI R2E I R3EI R IEI RH E
I ~
LA SALLE /Sit~\ !i/~ /
I \K500
1 '---I R2W T --R-'-W- I -R-'-E- -I R 2 E r-R-3-E-"&--- I R 5 E
I RfOEI R9E---..r--
I RaE
BUREAU450 -_---r""I
T21N I
I R8E
T22N I
Tt8N
TI7N
Tl6N
T20N J
TI9N
T'5N
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-18
POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE OF THECAMBRJAN-ORDOVICIAN AQUIFER, FALL 1963
REV~ 0 - APRIL 1984
5 0 5 10• •• ,J
Scate in Miles
~
Datum is mean sea level.
Elevation of Illinois River at Marseilles DamIs 483.25 feet MSL.
Contour Intervol Is 5Of••t.
Ground water east of the ground water
divide flows to the 80St - southeast toward(or98 cones of depressIon developed In thegreater metropolifan region around Ch!cogo;west of the divide J ground water flows to thesouth,and locally to the north, toward pumping
centers located along the Illinois River.
Modified from Sosman et 01. f 1973)p.21, Figure 10.
",.-- -- Ground water divide
Potentiometric surface contour J-650-Cambrian - Ordovician Aquifer ,October,J971
LEGEND
~NOTES
T36N
T38N
T37N
T39N
T31N
R7E I
R6E I R7E
R4E
2.
T35N3.
4.T34N
5.
T33NMORRt~
o \ ~'400 J 0
"450 T32N
Site
\\\'\\
--650
__J_-6'0o
Tt8N
I R8 E IRE I R ICE I RilE I R I E I R 2 E I R3 E I R4 E I R 5 E
T22N ILEE - - ~vr-"J_ - - --
T21N
Tj5N
T16N
Tl7N
Tl9N
T20N I
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-19
POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE OF THECAMBRIAN-OROOVICIAN AQUIFER, OCTOBER 1971
REV. 0 - APRIL !IN
'. i H ',11
LEGEND.' Domestic water well
:-beep well installed for La SalleCounty Station
• CoteQory ( 5 tructure
o Coolin~ toke.-- ... - Property line
NOTES
I. Domestic wen dato are presented inTo bl e 2.4 - t 5 according to well num-bars.
2. Base maps modified from USGS15 minute series (topographic) t
Odell Quadrangle, Illinois, 1958, and
USGS 7.5- minute series (topographic),
Marseilles Quodran9te, tllinois, 1970.
3. Data for the water wells installed for
La SoUe County Station are presented
tn Tobte 2.4- II •
4. Contour interval is 10 feet.
1000 0 1000 2000.-. ' 1
Scale in Fetf
LA SALLE COUNTY STATfONJPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-20
DOMESTIC WELL INVENTORY, INCLUDINGLSCS WATER WELLS
R,EV ~ 0 .- AJ?l~,IIJ
•, ,
'I
--~
c ,'._
....:-.....~
\.1
«.\~;'" <;....
40-12
F, ~~'~c_
l ... - ~
~)
~~ -~
"tS--·;6'0
\ "
...... '~--"':::"'<'-
//' t.'_:~_~~_~:_:~~~;-"'-;
,
"~""
"\
• i'~Z!-O-OlH.[:
n1"1 /._, ,
-;//
NOTES ?O{X) 0--=-~~-=-
Scolo In ...,
2000
•.. Ptezometer instolled May 28, 1970
thr_ October 30, 1973.
• Observation weB, instoUed DecemberJ 1974.
----Property line
~ Category I Structure
CooII09 Ioke
l. Dates of piezometer installation andfrequency of measurement are gil/enin Table 2.4 - 16.
2. Dotes of water level measurement oreshown in TabJe 2.4-17 .
3. Water level fluctuations in se lectedpiezometers are shown in Figure 2.4-22'}addft ianel unplatted pj ezometer dataare pr e s en ted in Table 2.4 - 18,
4 - W0 t er Ieve Iffuc tua t10nsin, theobservation wells are shown InFigure 2.4-23~
~), Contour interva I is 10 feet.
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2~4-21
LOCATIONS OF PIEZOMETERS ANDOBSERVATION WELLS
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
670
674
658
662
682
688
694
666
690
706
678
698
D.C......" 10!J .I9.u25
MARCHFEBRUARY.JANUARY
2!Q) 682 t-i--oo+'"--+-~~~"""""~--+---"+--'~~--+-~~~~""""""~""""""~~-"'~""""""'~'
j~2 678 ..........+--t+--~~~~---~'-.....Q)
Eo~ 674 ....,...~.-.+-"'-i~~~~I----+-~-+....,-;....+-~~.............~~..;-.~~----+-"-+----..-..+-" ...........CD....oa..
;:+686---..
4.0
3.0mtmffiEimtffiEm& 2.0
1.0
0.0OCTca~R
.s 4.0 Et- ~4frJf:!1J=IrP:i:+ ~'+-o>:~........t·'h--t~:-:-+c~~t~:~'''';~~~4',tt~.1~,L1::'t ..tt+,·q·-,r.t.H.t.+#~+i' +r+i..,....~!--t"'<-t:~+t....H-.::::'~::H:3.0 ~:..;..~ =1',,,' ...t,H'-<-;"~""'" '''';'''''1."'-''_.. ~"'';_'" ~.~~~~..l~~ . .j..++-.. -++.........
~ ~;.:t" +t... 1""++~·~·b+H'-'-;"i.,~-!,,·~ t""-r~-r1..,·~~~~···~··t"H"+""+H+2.0 ' H"" .,' ..-0 k--+-,·'H ;...'~~.4-.l-t+~+h--~·f+'''1·'~·''·-~-t·f-o.+~'''+I;+·'·-i1"'~''·H·+T''':'
~++-""'''''J~'M·h~,.. ,...t··,-",~~~ .• +-,-+~-+2 :_'~+"'~-j.+'t--t'rM~r;r ..t+1:;;;t~+t:+t.: ..1·4tr-"~-i·"""'·'·"·'rl'-+-·'~~+,->-j.t..+..--:t+l1,+...+~·~~.. ;"'._..tt-l..''';:~'J-~',+t~:~+~~'4'~~:.~~":,: ..c:1.':t..~:.t.
1.0 '~T H- -,..·:ttJ......" :~: +~ "w. ~·~-+-+t#·J-H-l~+~--~+t-H·~·+·H-ttt.!Utt::Wm:t~mtt; rl- f.t:" . ;...1- H~:H.7~t:tt~1 !-ttl ~ 4 r+-:+r ,d. i-'H..,"~'+~'-"""'f.-'+o0 1+++-4+H+++:"7 ...-t~~·-i+r;'++h ...+~+!-'+t H-r f.-i.+·H·++-'--tt·m....t+r1 +H ~ ~--HJ.!-h-·'~t"+H"""!4'~·~~-->-i!
· S to 15 20 2& 8 10 1e 20 2S ~ to t& 20 25JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH
NOTES 1970
installation J surface elevations, tested intervals J andmeasurements are given in Table 2.4- 16.
Potentiometric revels are inferred
Locations
between dates of measurement.
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-22DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONS
OF WATER LEVELS IN PIEZOMETERS(SHEET 1 of 4)
within theAll piezometers are insto liedglacial drift aquitard .
5.
offrequency
Figure 2.4- 21.inore shownof piezometers
oflevel
Dateswater
I.
3.
2.•4. Precipitation data were recorded at the Marseilles Lock,4fo21' N
88°451
W Long ..Lat. , REV. 0 APRIL 1984
£ 4.0 J::4++8'~1+'!!++-trL!'1':r·,~fT·_::=t- r:.IT--~t!1,.~r;':.-,-!!.··t:!=-stnt.:r·~·'!':tmrP+tmr~h4~ ++- .-,...~~~~.~ 1'-,·--H·'·r-·'+;"" ~·"'r-~t'~··,·,...f··,..",.,H-~···+'''~''~-~+~~-4-+i·+'
• ~ ..........~ ~"" ' •."'7 ,.... f.J....+~,..-o .. ~>o~+·;"".-..,+I··~
to itS 20 215FEBRUARY
NOTES 1971
706
702
690
686
682
678
670
666
658
H,.t+t!'+'h'_+~"'H'+rlt+++t+H-i1H-ttH'"4.0rtTtt1~tt;ttttiittmt:t:¢t113.0~~~~~~,~+HtJ; 2.0
1.0_ ..........................IoooW.oII-..~ 0.0
2. Dotes of installation, surface elevations, tested intervals, and frequency ofwater level measurements.' are given in Table 2.4- 16.
L Locations of piezometers are shown in
3. Potentiometric levels are inferred
4.. Precipitation data were recorded88°45' W Long.
Figure 2.4- 21.
between dates of measurement.
at the Marseilles Lock,41°21 1 N Lat.,
5. All piezometers are installed within theglacial drift aquitard.
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-22DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONS
OF WATER LEVELS IN PIEZOMETERS(SHEET 2 of 4)
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
DECEM.EIt10 18 20 28 706
702
698
694
690
686
682, .
678
674
670
666
662
658
3. Potentiometric levels ore inferred between dates of measurement.
4. Precipitation dato were recorded at the Marseilles lOCk , 4f o 2f' N Lot.,88°45' W Long ..
2. Dotes of installation, surface elevations, tested intervals, and frequencywater level measurements ore given in Table 2.4- 16.
NOTES
L Locations of piezometers are shown in Figure 2.4-21.
of
5.
1970
AI f piezometers are installedglaciol drIft oquitard.
within the
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-22DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONS
OF WATER LEVELS IN PIEZOMETERS(SHEET 3 of 4)
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
..-......J 690 ......~..;.+olI---~~~~"""""-~~~~~~~""""-";'''''--+-~~
'to-+ 686
~~ 682 ..........~--+----t---...;....,.~~+-:--+---t._+---+-- ..............~~4-~-+~ ..............O+--..............---....---~-+4l-l
o~i:
liE.Q...c:CD....oQ..
706
686
682
678
674
670
666
662
658
of installation, surface elevations, tested intervals, andlevel measurements are given in Tobie 2.4-16.
between dotes of measurement.3. Potentiometric leveh are inferred
3.02.01.00.0
~ te 15 20 2!5JANUARY
NOTES
J. Locations
2. Dateswater
of piezometers are shown jn Figure 2.4-2 r.
frequency of
JUl.(
1971
5. All piezometers ore installed wIthin the
glacial drift aquitard.
4.0
3.02.0Lv0.0
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-22DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONS
OF WATER LEVELS IN PIEZOMETERS(SHEET 4 of 4)
4. Precipitation dato were recorded at the Marseilles Lock, 41°21 ' N Lat.,880 45 J W Long.
REVe 0 APRIL 1984
720
710
-J 700en:E.po."to- 690+J!2<J.) 680>Q)......J
.S:2 6702l-.......(1)
E0..... 660c:<I,)+-0C-
It 650
640
630
620
c.Q"0......."0..oell\-.a...
FEBPUARY ,l,PRIL DEC.......1S ao.e
ITl2F£gffiBN1~~__9 740
720
710
700
690
680
660
630
620
. ; ;- -'.- "j'-'" -"'~- ~?, i+y~'~ .H" -~---H-"----' ~ ..~ ... ,--;".,-, ;--I'-'--'--f'-i"+'-+~+ 'f -H-t 4.03.0
2.0
1.00.0
NOTES
I. Locations of observation weJls are shown in Figure 2.4-21.
2. Surface elevations of the observation wells are given inTable 2.4 -17.
3. Observation weJls were installed during December 1 1974.The average depth is 25 ft.; granular backfill was placedaround the lower 8 ft. of each obser/offon well. All ob-servation wells are installed in the glacial drift oquitordi
1975
4. Dates of woter JIve' rneosuremenfs are shownin Table 2.4-17; potentiometric Jevels are in-ferred between dof.1 of mealuremen t,
5. Precipitation doto wlr. recorded at the MarseillesLock, 41°2'-N., 88°4e'W.
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-23DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONSOF WATER LEVELS IN OBSERVATION WELLS
(SHEET 1 of 4)REV~ 0 ~ APRIL 1984
.5c:o:.;::~0..()Q)a:
4.0 ~~~tm':1mtt:ttttTt:tr::rtrt'i'!:ttrt::'~tt!1'!1~::r.ttt11".tt!!ttttr:tr:tr::t:rr~t:'Ttt!
3.0 J,+~~~~~~..-4+-h-:.
2.0 ..,..'1~~+t#~~~~irl~~~~.
1.0 ~~i+"-r.~~.~++~~~W
O.0 "'-""";'i5~-''''''O''''''''1'''''~~Z'''''''O''''''''''''~-'
JANUARY
NOTES
740
730
7?O
710
700
620
:,c>T?~~",,"r;~'~~>'i~';-?;r'Tfrr:rrm+rJ~G:~rrr;'''r~='t::~ttfT7::r:rr~r:rr:T:::1TTI:'T!7T:-p"~:'ITr::"Y~':-~rTrrrrr-'-:r~~i~:rr:mtrrITr;r:Tr;nJJrn-rrc~rTnTt,nrr::Trn:Trrn:r~~+r!Pt!'t1t1mnn:ttttm!l,4.03.0
2.01.00.0
1975
I.. Locations of observation wefts are shown in Figure 2 .. 4-21.
2. Surface elevations of the observation wells are given inTable 2 ..4-17.
3. Observation wells were installed during December t 1974.The average depth is 25 ft .. ; granular backfill was placedaround the lower 8 ft. of each observation well. AI t ob-servation wells are installed in the glacial drift aquitard.
4.. Dates of V«1ter !eveI measurements ore shownin Tobie 2.4 -17; potentiometric leve Is are in-fe rred between dotes of meo su rement .
5.. Precipitation data were recorded ot the MarseillesLock ,41°21 r N., 88045 t W..
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-23DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONSOF WATER LEVELS IN OBSERVATION WELLS
(SHEET 2 of 4) IREV. 0 - APRIL 1984
680
690
710
650
620
740
630
660
640
670
730
720
700
DECEM.atS 10 111 .0 ••
710
~ to HS 20MARCH
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
4.0 ~!T!!:f'!'1+P~+++t:1+tP1t!T!+tmtt"J:rrt'4+NT1~+mHrnH+!',... rn1".:+ymb"+...m-,-rp~..-.m~,,#· ;::mHTm:rp:p+n+++rrr+++1l
3~0 ~~ri-l<_~--"i'-"'-'~-t1~ ~ri-H-t-H-t·'l---'-·H-+i'C.......,.·t . "'~1":"f--" t:--+°--th-Y-H-h.,.·~+.l-...~-.r. ~+·'..-t""f-++f+H-H+H··'-~~·~'J"~ "T;"1:~t0";"'H"'·· .C"+-t-t-J ·~+,,··:-,-"·t j++t--f·
t-1-'1I- .......-+-t"'..!-'..·->."i-;~"---t·_-:.,.·,t·rl~_·~·--t·~r---_·t!···".· .. ····f·, •.... -'''~''-
H-+-;++-;ri'.t-'-.-+--+..;..t-~.,.'t--i·+;r~ ""~,'-t- i:+.,.++-T+~.".-r'"'+--i-'';''''~+'i-, ;"'i+"'"f'l\"'" ':-t- .. +"+·--H--·H .... i·++t~++,H-~-·tT·r>-~·4",+t·t"t~<T1-·rc~i:---.."-··rt '.TH.-r"tH 't-kiH '-+-1---" ~ ~--' 'H·++~-·H~.. ,"-·-H·..;...'-+f+'..,.f.., >'-H-·H+-;-t+(."··~+..L.+rH..,,·~~t ~-1"··
.5
NOTES
L Locations of observation wells are shown in Figure 2.4-21.
2. Surface elevations of the observation wells are given inTobIe 2.4 -17.
3. Observation wells were installed during December, 1974.The average depth is 25 ft.; granular backfiU was placedaround the lower 8 ft. of each observation well. All ob-servation welfs are installed in the glacial dr j ft aquitard.
5.
1975
Dates of water level measurements ore shownin Table 2.4 -17; potentiomefric levels are in-ferred between dates of measuremen t.
Precipitation data were recorded ot the MarseillesLock, 410 21
I
N., 88°45·W.
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-23DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONSOF WATER LEVELS IN OBSERVATION WELLS
(SHEET 3 of 4)REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
:J 700U):E..-'+-
+ 690
.2~
+-Q)
E.S!.-c:Q)....o0...
JANUARYe '0 ns 20 2:5
FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL J () L .~. AUGiJ )'., . ..,. ~ t() l~
.~1j~:T"'T-"~-
~~ ~-~t··~1 ;I ~ :
."- t ~:
<:.!P'T£MB£f.I. OCTOBER Deep...10 U. ao •• 740
730
720
710
700
690
680
670
660
650
640
630
.sc.Q4-
~.9-()<Vl.-e..
NOTESL Locations of observation wells ore shown in Figure 2 .4-21.
2. Surface elevations of the observation welts ore given in"T'obte 2.4-17.
3. Observation wells were installed during December, 1974.The averoQe depth is 25 ft.; granular backfill was placedaround the lowe r 8 f 1. of each observation we J I. A" ob-servation wells ore instof led in the glaciol drift aquitard ..
1975
4. Dotes of water level measurements ore shownin Tobie 2 ..4-17; potentiometric levels are in-ferred between dates of measurement.
5. Water level meolur.ments in weB no. f8 ofterJuly 21,1975, may be affected by a broken cap.
6. Pr~cipitation data were recorded at the Marseif lesL(,~kJ 41 0 21
1
N. t 88°45' W.
........,..,.",...,..,..."..~~4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-23DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONSOF WATER LEVELS IN OBSERVATION WELLS
(SHEET 4 of 4)REV~ 0 - APRIL 1984