lecture 7 innovation
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
LECTURE 7 Innovation
March 11, 2015
Economics 210A Christina Romer Spring 2015 David Romer
![Page 2: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
I. OVERVIEW
![Page 3: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Central Issues
• What determines technological progress?
• Or, more concretely, what determines the pace of inventive activity?
![Page 4: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Determinants of Inventive Activity
• Demand-side factors:
• Greater growth and booms may raise the returns to inventive activity.
• Supply-side factors:
• More secure property rights could raise the incentives for inventive activity.
• Learning-by-doing.
• Education, religion, class structure.
![Page 5: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Today’s Papers
• Differ in countries and periods covered.
• What unites them is creativity in data collection.
![Page 6: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
II. KENNETH L. SOKOLOFF
“INVENTIVE ACTIVITY IN EARLY INDUSTRIAL AMERICA: EVIDENCE FROM PATENT RECORDS, 1790-1846”
![Page 7: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Sokoloff’s Data
• Patent records.
• Sample of 4,500 patents for 1790-1846.
• What is good about them?
• What are potential problems?
![Page 8: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
From: Sokoloff, “Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America”
![Page 9: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
First Issue: Procyclicality of Patenting Activity
• Looking for a time-series relationship between patenting activity and output.
• Wants to argue in favor of a demand-side story for inventive activity.
![Page 10: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
From: Sokoloff, “Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America”
Business Cycle Conditions: Embargo Contraction Expansion Contraction
![Page 11: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
From: Sokoloff, “Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America”
(Continued)
Business Cycle Conditions: Embargo Contraction Expansion Contraction
![Page 12: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Industrial Production and Patenting Rates
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1790
1794
1798
1802
1806
1810
1814
1818
1822
1826
1830
1834
1838
1842
1846
Pate
ntin
g Ra
tes
Indu
stria
l Pro
duct
ion
(Log
s)
Source: Davis, “An Annual Index of U.S. Industrial Production, 1790-1915,” QJE, 2004.
![Page 13: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
From: Sokoloff, “Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America”
![Page 14: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
From: Sokoloff, “Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America”
![Page 15: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Second Issue: Relationship between Patenting Activity and Waterways
• Looking at the cross-sectional variation in patenting activity.
• A relationship with waterways could suggest a role for the growth of markets.
![Page 16: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
From: Sokoloff, “Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America”
1805-1811 1830-1836
![Page 17: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
From: Sokoloff, “Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America”
1805-1811 1830-1836
![Page 18: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
From: Sokoloff, “Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America”
1805-1811 1830-1836
![Page 19: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
From: Sokoloff, “Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America”
![Page 20: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Interpretation of the Cross-Section Evidence
• Sokoloff emphasizes growth of markets leading to higher returns to inventive activity.
• Alternative supply-side stories?
![Page 21: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Evaluation of Sokoloff?
![Page 22: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
III. PETRA MOSER
“HOW DO PATENT LAWS INFLUENCE INNOVATION? EVIDENCE FROM NINETEENTH-CENTURY WORLD’S FAIRS”
![Page 23: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Issue Moser Investigates
• Do patent laws change the composition of innovation?
![Page 24: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Crystal Palace Exhibition of 1851
![Page 25: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Crystal Palace Exhibition of 1851
![Page 26: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Centennial Exhibition of 1876
![Page 27: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Centennial Exhibition of 1876
![Page 28: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Exhibition Data
• From two World’s Fairs: 1851, 1876
• Source: Exhibition catalogs
• What information is provided on each invention?
• Strengths of the data, particularly relative to patent records?
• Potential weaknesses?
![Page 29: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
From: Moser, “How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation?”
![Page 30: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
First Issue: How Much Was Patenting Used in Various Industries?
• This is a way of identifying how patent laws (or lack of them) may skew the direction of invention.
![Page 31: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
From: Moser, “How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation?”
![Page 32: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Second Issue: What Is the Relationship between Patent Laws and Composition of Exhibitions?
![Page 33: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
From: Moser, “How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation?”
![Page 34: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
• The mean of the distribution is equal to the number of degrees of freedom.
• The variance is equal to two times the number of degrees of freedom.
From: Moser, “How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation?”
![Page 35: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
From: Moser, “How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation?”
![Page 36: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Multinomial Logit Estimation
• Unit of observation is now individual exhibits (have about 14,000).
• Think of an inventor choosing to innovate in one of 7 industries.
• Key RHS variable is a dummy equal to 1 if the country the inventor is from doesn’t have a patent law.
• Other controls as well.
![Page 37: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
From: Moser, “How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation?”
![Page 38: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
From: Moser, “How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation?”
![Page 39: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
From: Moser, “How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation?”
![Page 40: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Causation
• Moser wants to interpret evidence as showing that lack of patenting skews investment toward instruments and processed foods.
• But, are there other explanations? • Small sample; perhaps there were idiosyncratic
factors. • Perhaps there is path dependence. Switzerland
started making watches for a random reason and then continued to innovate in that area.
• Perhaps there is reverse causation.
![Page 41: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
The Netherlands as a Natural Experiment
• Abolished their patent laws between the two fairs.
• Moser says for relatively exogenous reasons.
• What happens to composition of innovation?
![Page 42: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
From: Moser, “How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation?”
![Page 43: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Evaluation of Moser?
![Page 44: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
IV. PETER THOMPSON
“HOW MUCH DID THE LIBERTY SHIPBUILDERS LEARN? NEW EVIDENCE FOR AN OLD CASE STUDY”
![Page 45: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Learning-by-Doing
• Innovation as a side-effect of production.
• Production makes it easier to innovate – like an outward shift in the “supply curve” of innovation.
• May have implications involving externalities, amplification mechanisms, and endogenous growth.
![Page 46: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Liberty Ships as a Case Study
• Liberty ships were viewed as a relatively homogenous commodity produced in large quantity with few changes in production processes (other than ones resulting from learning-by-doing).
• Previous evidence from Liberty ships was important in shaping views about learning-by-doing.
![Page 47: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
An Economics 210A Field Trip?
From: tripadvisor.com
![Page 48: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
From: Thompson, “How Much Did the Liberty Shipbuilders Learn?”
![Page 49: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Previous Estimates
ln 𝑦𝑖𝑖 = 𝐴 + λ𝑡 + 𝛼 ln𝑊𝑖𝑖 +𝛽 ln 𝐿𝑖𝑖 + 𝛾 ln𝑌𝑖𝑖 + 𝜀𝑖𝑖 ,
where:
• i indexes shipyards and t indexes time;
• y is output;
• W is “ways” (loosely speaking, construction berths);
• L is person-hours;
• Yit is cumulative output at yard i before period t.
Argote, Beckman, and Epple (1990) find 𝛾� = 0.44.
![Page 50: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Thompson’s Concerns
• Increases in capital over time.
• Reductions in quality over time.
![Page 51: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Suggestive Evidence of the Importance of Capital
• About two-thirds of the overall investment done after shipbuilding had started.
![Page 52: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
From: Thompson, “How Much Did the Liberty Shipbuilders Learn?”
![Page 53: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Suggestive Evidence of the Importance of Capital
• About two-thirds of the overall investment done after shipbuilding had started.
• Anecdotal evidence of the importance of capital.
• There were large differences in capital across shipyards, and yards with more capital were more productive.
![Page 54: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
From: Thompson, “How Much Did the Liberty Shipbuilders Learn?”
![Page 55: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
From: Thompson, “How Much Did the Liberty Shipbuilders Learn?”
Another Economics 210A Field Trip?
From: wikipedia.org
![Page 56: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Thompson’s Estimation
ln 𝑦𝑖𝑖 = 𝐴𝑖 + 𝛼 ln𝐾𝑖𝑖 +𝛽 ln 𝐿𝑖𝑖 + 𝛾 ln𝐸𝑖𝑖 + 𝜀𝑖𝑖 ,
where:
• K is capital;
• E is experience;
• The rest of the notation is the same as before.
![Page 57: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Some Measurement Issues
• From authorized capital spending to the capital stock.
• For K, Thompson uses either the estimated capital stock or the estimated capital stock times estimated capital utilization.
• For E, Thompson uses either cumulative output before period t or cumulative labor-hours before period t.
![Page 58: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Is OLS OK?
• Perhaps this is a (rare!) case where it’s reasonable.
![Page 59: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
From: Thompson, “How Much Did the Liberty Shipbuilders Learn?”
![Page 60: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
From: Thompson, “How Much Did the Liberty Shipbuilders Learn?”
![Page 61: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
An Alternative to Regressions to Find the Role of Increases in K/L: “Liberty Ship Growth
Accounting” – Initial Steps
• Assume that by late in the war, MPK/𝑟 = 𝑀𝑀𝐿/𝑤 (where r is the user cost of capital).
• Assume Cobb-Douglas production, 𝑌𝑖𝑖 = 𝐴𝑖𝑖𝐾𝑖𝑖𝛼𝐿𝑖𝑖1−𝛼 .
• Algebra yields: 𝛼1− 𝛼
= 𝑟𝑖𝑖𝐾𝑖𝑖𝑤𝑖𝑖𝐿𝑖𝑖
.
![Page 62: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
“Liberty Ship Growth Accounting” – Implementation
• Find r , K, w, and L late in the war.
• Infer α.
• Calculate the implied series for ln𝐴𝑖𝑖.
• Use this as the dependent variable in regressions (in the extreme, with only a constant and a measure of experience on the right-hand side).
![Page 63: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
“Liberty Ship Growth Accounting” – Advantages and Disadvantages Relative to Finding Capital’s
Contribution by OLS?
![Page 64: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
From: Thompson, “How Much Did the Liberty Shipbuilders Learn?”
![Page 65: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
From: Thompson, “How Much Did the Liberty Shipbuilders Learn?”
![Page 66: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Importance of Quality Adjustment
“Even with these upper limits, the effects of quality adjustment on the productivity numbers are modest. …The unadjusted productivity increase is 122 percent and the adjusted productivity increase is no less than 113 percent; thus the raw data contain a measurement error equivalent to no more than 6 percent of measured productivity growth.”
![Page 67: LECTURE 7 Innovation](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012511/618a26b0f642af7d276df926/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Conclusion
• Thompson’s view: “it does seem reasonable to draw one conclusion from the Liberty ship program that is likely to resonate elsewhere: in a case study that is widely viewed as one of the cleanest examples of learning by doing on record, the real causes of productivity growth have turned out to be more complex and more diverse than economists have long believed to be the case.”
• Do you agree?