lecture -the cell system- primary cells€¦ · lecture -the cell system-primary cells - prof. dr....
TRANSCRIPT
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Lecture -The Cell System-
Primary Cells -
Prof. Dr. Thomas Groth
Biomedical Materials
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Content
• Isolation and cultivation of primary cells
• Problem: senescence
• Problem: dedifferentiation in vitro
• Immortalization of cells
• Conditions for in vitro culture
• Options for cultivation of adherent cells
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Primary Cells
• Cells that are cultured directly from a subject in vitro Primary cells
• With exception of some tumor cells, primary cell have limited lifespan in vitro
• Require special media and surfaces to survive
• Different tissue types from same species may have quite different media requirements
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Utilization of Primary Cells
• Pros:
Immunologic harmless if autologous
Differentiated function for replacement of target tissue (e.g. chondrocytes for cartilage)
• Cons:
Limited amount of cells available
Morbidity at extraction site
Limited division capacity (tissue type, age of patient)
Infected (damaged) cells in diseases
Dedifferentiation during in vitro culture
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Extraction of Primary Cells
• Biopsy of relevant tissue
• Mechanical or enzymatic dissociation tissue single cells
• Enzymes trypsin, dispase, collagenase, hyaluronase, et al.
• Explant culture outgrowing of primary cells from biopsy into tissue culture
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Isolation of Cells From Tissues
Enzyme Enzyme
Biopsy enzymatic digestion separation, isolation
Biopsy, Explant Migration, Proliferation
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Change of Cell Behaviour Due to Isolation
---
Gene expression
Secretion
Organization of cytoskeleton
Phagocytosis procedures
Surface charge
Adhesion behaviour
Permeability, transport processes
Surface antigens (receptors)
Intercellular communication
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Cultivation of Primary Cells
• Propagation of cells in vitro preparation of adequate cell numbers for TE
• Division capability depends on tissue type and donor age
• Accessible cell count of biopsies is limited (ca. 60 doublings in vitro) Senescence
• Dedifferentiation in vitro
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Cell Cycle
S-Phase
G2-Phase
Mitosis
G1-Phase
G0-Phase
(no cell division)
G1-Phase – Synthesis RNA, proteins, lipids
S-Phase – Replication DNA
G2-Phase – Preparation cell division
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Duration of Interphase
MitosisInterphase
Duration of interphase:
blood stem cells, tumor cells days
liver, kidney, gut glands years
neurons, heart muscle lifelong
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Examples for Regeneration Capability of Tissues
Tissue New cells/d [%] Life time [d]
Neural cells 0
Liver parenchyma 0.2 - 0.7
Kidney parenchyma 0.3 – 0.4
Thyroid parenchyma 0.3
Bladder epithelium 2 64
Trachea epithelium 2.1 48
Epidermis 5.2 19
Stomach epithelium 56.4 1.8
Small intestine epithelium 79 1.3
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Growth Curves of Cells in Vitro
Plateau-PhaseLog-PhaseLag-PhaseX – Population
doubling time
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Limited Number of Cell Divisions
• Different division capabilities (growth rate) depending on donor age and tissue type: Maximum about 60 divisions!
• Generation number n cell number N = N0 x 2n with N ~ initial cell number and n ~ number of divisions (usually <60)
• Generation time tG tG = t/n with t ~ reading time
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Example of Calculation
• Required cell number for therapeutic intervention (e.g. liver replacementby biohybrid extracorporal liver support) 1011 – 1012 cells in total
• Biopsie yields 106 cells
• N = N0 x 2n with N = 1012, N0 = 106
• N/N0 = 2n 106 = 2n
• log10 106 = n x log102
• log10 106 /log102 = n 6/0.301 = n
• n ~ 20 Passages (generations) required
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Correlation Between Life Time, Species and Division Capability of Cells
• Experiments Leonhard Hayflickembryonic fibroblasts max. 50 celldivisions
• Different species correlationbetween life time and number of max. cell divisions of fibroblasts
• Example chicken: max. life time 12 yearsmax. 25 cell divisions
• Example Galapagos - giant turtle: max. life time 175 yearsmax. 130 celldivisions
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Relevance of Telomers for Aging
• Chromosome ends (Telomers) repeating units of 6 bases TTAGGG
• Telomers shield chromosomes from degradation
• During cell division loss of repeating units telomers are reduced
• Beginning of embryonic growth telomers 10.000 base pairs long
• Birth telomers only half that size
• Per cell division loss of 8 repeating units
• Loss of telomers per division higher at short-living than long-living birds and mammals
• Loss of telomers loss of functional DNA per division + signal to tumor suppressor gene p53 Stop of division
• Germ cells, stem cells, immortal cancer cells telomerase active
http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/local/projects/burgoine/origins.txt.html
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Telomerase
• Telomerase as Reverse Transcriptase use of RNA template for repair of telomers
• 85% of all human cancer cells expression of human TElomerase Reverse Transcriptase (hTERT)
• RNA template in most body cells expressed expression of hTERT critical for immortalization
The National Institutes of Health resource for stem cell research
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Causes for Limited Division Capability• Replicative senescence of cells
• Regulators tumor suppressor genes pRB(retinoblastoma protein) and p53 (src kinase), as well as Telomers
• Telomer length reduced due to cell division somatic cells telomerase inactive
• (85-90% of all cancer cells telomerase active)
• p53 - late G1 Phase cell division blocking the access to S-Phase
• RB1 - slows down the transition from G0/G1 into S-Phase
• P53 + pRB inactive in cancer cells
• (Viral oncoproteins SV 40 LT and HPV E6 disable tumorsuppressor genes pRB and p53)
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Example for Senescence of Cells
Embryonic murine fibroblasts: top normal cell culture, bottom senescent cells, right MDCK-cells
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Barriers to Cell Immortalization
M0 – Stop cell divisions of epithelial cells
M1 – ageing of cell (fibroblasts division stop, metabolism active)
M2 – Either apoptosis of cells or immortalization
TMM – Telomerase maintenance mechanism
RAS – Signal transducer (see lecture signal transduction)
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Immortalization of Cells I
• Telomerase hTERC RNA subunit + hTERT catalytic + reverse transcriptase-subunit
• Ectopic expression of hTERT immortalization of pre-senescent fibroblasts and endothelial cells in vitro (normal karyotype, normal behaviour at reduction of serum)
• Epithelial cells despite hTERT – senescence!!!
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Immortalization of Cells II
• Ectopic expression of SV 40 T-Antigen disables pRB + p53 tumor supressor genes Problem: no growth control + dedifferentiation
• HPV-16 E6/E7 – transfection of chondrocytes with vector preservation of differentiation without neoplastic potential possible
Oncogene (2005) 24, 7729–7745
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Problem II – Dedifferentiation
In vivo:
Specific ECM + neighbouring cells mix of fixed and soluble signals around
typical cell morphology
Expression of cell-typical proteins
Transport functions, etc
Isolation of cells:
Mechanical, enzymatic treatment
Change of cell shape
Loss of surface structures
Cultivation in vitro:
Adhesion substrate change of cell shape
Loss of neighbour cells (e.g. epithelium-mesenchymal-interaction)
Change of medium composition
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Dedifferentiation in Vitro
American Journal of Pathology. 2005;166:1077-1088.)© 2005 American Society for Investigative Pathology
Transdifferentiation of Mature Rat Hepatocytes into Bile Duct-Like Cells in VitroYuji Nishikawa*, Yuko Doi, Hitoshi Watanabe, Takuo Tokairin*, Yasufumi Omori*, Mu Su*, Toshiaki Yoshioka* and Katsuhiko Enomoto
Factors affecting proliferation and dedifferentiation of primary bovine oviduct epithelial cells in vitroReischl, J. ; Prelle, K.5; Schöll, H. ; Neumüller, C.2; Einspanier, R.; Sinowatz, F. and Wolf, E.5: Cell Tissue Res. 296 (1999) S. 371-383
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Examples for Dedifferentiation
• Cartilage tissue cells in vitro - production of unspecific collagenes (collagen I instead of collagen II)
• Liver cells in vitro - loss of cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, urea synthesis, etc.
• Endothelium cells - pro-coagulant, pro-inflammatory behaviour
• Epithelium cells - change of transport properties
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Dedifferentiation of Primary Chondrocytes in Vitro
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Dedifferentiation of Primary Chondrocytes in Vitro
Immunofluorescence staining of primary chondrocytes after 1 (A & B) and 4 (D &E) weeks against collagen II (A&D) and collagen i (D&E)
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Comparison of Media Compositions
human serum
Medium 199
Basal Medium Eagle
Williams Medium E
DulbeccosModified Eagle Me
pH-value 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4
Na+
[mmol]142 139 146 144 158
Cl- 103 125 111 117 116
K+ 4 5.1 4.8 4.8 4.8
Ca++ 2.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3
Glucose (mg/ml)
100 99 94 186 382
mOsm 290 270 286 288 323
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Additional Medium Supplements
• Essential amino acids for protein metabolism
• Vitamines like biotin, cholinchloride, D-Ca-panthotenate, folin acid, nicotinamide, et al.
• Components for DNA and RNA-synthesis and energy metabolism (e.g. Adenine, Thymidine, Glucose, Sodium pyruvate, etc.)
• Buffer substances for pH-value stability e.g. NaHCO3 or HEPES
• Color-indicators for pH-value of the medium like phenol red
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Serum
• Serum: heterogeneous mixture of proteins - growth and adhesion supporting properties!!!
• Production by blood coagulation !
• Mixture of proteins (transport proteins, growth factors), hormones, electrolytes and other components
• Origin other species like cow (fetal, new born), horse, goat, sheep, rabbit, chicken, etc.
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Problems with Sera
• Serum for majority of cells no physiological liquid
• Variation of quality from batch to batch (dependent on animal source)
• Sera can contain inhibitors for cells
• In heterogeneous cultures (e.g. explants) growth undesirable cells (e.g. fibroblasts)
• Uptake of serum proteins by human cells acquire immunogenicity
• Risk of viral infections e.g. Retroviruses and BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy)
• High costs
• attempts of “serum-free” cultivation
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Supplements for Serum-Free Cultures
Additive Cell types Application
Transferrin All 1 - 20 µg/ml
Trace elements All Depends on cell type
DL-a-Tocopherol All 0.01 - 1 µg/ml
Sodium selenite All 20 nm
Progesterone Epithelium cells 1 - 10 nm
Poly-D-Lysine Fibroblasts 0.1mg/ml
Ascorbic acid All 10 - 100 µg/ml
Hydrocortisone Epithelium cells 1 - 10 nm
Insulin All 1 - 10 µg/ml
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Supplements for Preservation of the Phenotype (Examples)
• EGF (1 - 10 ng/ml) fibroblast, endothelium cells, glial cells
• aFGF (3 - 100 ng/ml) mesoderm, 3T3, amnion fibroblasts
• bFGF (0.3 - 10 ng/ml) mesoderm, 3T3, amnion fibroblasts
• G-CSF (0.05 - 5 ng/ml) bone marrow cells
• GM-CSF (0.003 - 1 ng/ml) bone marrow cells
• IGF II (20 - 200 ng/ml) chondrocytes, 3T3
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Anchorage Factors
• Adherent-dependent cells growth on tissue culture plates not optimal
• Serum-free culture no “attachment”-factors
• surface coating of culture flasks with:
Collagen, gelatine
Fibronectin, superfibronectin, fibronectin-fragments, Laminin, thrombospondin, vitronectin
Matrigel - ECM gel from mouse tumor cell line
Glycosaminoglycans like heparin, chitosan
Poly-L-Lysine
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Application of Anchorage Factors I
• Collagen I: epithelium cells, muscle cells, neurons
• Collagen II: chondrocytes
• Collagen IV: epithelium cells, endothelium cells, muscle cells, neurons
• Gelatine: many different cell types
• Chondroitin sulfate: chondrocytes, neurons
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Application of Anchorage Actors II
• Fibronectin: epithelium cells, endothelium cells, fibroblasts, mesenchymal cells, neurons
• Laminin: epithelium cells, endothelium cells, hepatocytes, muscle cells, Schwann cells
• Thrombospondin: osteoblasts, endothelium cells, neurons
• Vitronectin: endothelium cells, osteosarcoma cells
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Possibilities of in Vitro Culture I
Adherend cultures in cell culture flasks
Materials: polystyrene, plasma-treated
Pro: high cell numbers
Adherend cultures on membrane inserts (epithelium cells)
Materials: cellulose acetate, polycarbonate
Pro: polarization of cells possible (basal, apical)
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Possibilities of in Vitro Culture II
Perfusion culturesDifferent geometries:
fixed bed, flat bed, hollow fibre design
Materials: cellulose acetate, polycarbonate, polysulfone
Pro: high cell numbers, continuous replacement of media
delivery of nutrients, oxygen (convective)
removal (toxic) metabolitesMinucell-Bioreactor
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Possibilities of in Vitro Culture III
Culture on microcarriers in suspension (spinner flasks)
Good supply of the cells
High cell numbers accessible
Matrix material degradable?
Application as suspension for Tissue Engineering
Example “Skin out of a tube”
Example: Kidney epithelium cells from a pork
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Mass Cultivation of Adherend Cells
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Tissue Spheroids
• Exploitation of aggregation potential of cells scaffold-free production of tissue equivalents
• Fabrication by cultivation:
in agitated flasks, roller bottles, spinner flasks
on non-adhesive surfaces
compression based on centrifugation
on cell culture inserts
within hanging droplets
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Making of Tissue Spheroids
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Tissue Spheroids
• Fabrication from single or mixed cell populations
• Size control optimization of supply with oxygen + nutrients
• Cell motility during formation intercellular organization including polarization, formation of extracellular matrix high functionality, no dedifferentiation
• Compatibility with low cell numbers and volumes
• Application possible with many cell types
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Formation of MIN6 Aggregates on Agarose Chips
MIN6 aggregates on agarose chip [4x, 10x]. MIN6 aggregates outside agarose chip [10x] – free floating.
Micromoulds made of agarose
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Tissue Spheroids
Confocal pictures of spheroids from two cell types
a) hepatocytes / endothelium cells b) chondrocytes
Application of spheroids as transplants, 3D tissue models, pharmaceutical studies, etc.
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Literature
• W.W. Minuth, R. Strehl, K. Schumacher, Zukunftstechnologie Tissue Engineering, Wiley VCH 2003
• T. Lindl, Zell- und Gewebkultur, Spektrum/Gustav Fischer Verlag 2000
• JM Kelm & M. Fussenegger, Microscale tissue engineering using gravity-enforced cell assembly, Trends in Biotechnology 22 (2004) 195-202
• WC Hahn, Immmortalization and Transformation of Human Cells. Molecules and Cells 13 (2002) 351-361
• B.Best, Mechanisms of Aging