leveraging map data to improve instruction

31
LEVERAGING MAP DATA TO IMPROVE INSTRUCTION Presenter : Amanda DeCardy Elementary Assistant Principal Distinguished Educator National Board Certified Teacher Universal American School of Dubai [email protected]

Upload: amanda-decardy

Post on 06-Apr-2017

300 views

Category:

Education


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

leveraging MAP Data to improve instruction

leveraging MAP Data to improve instructionPresenter: Amanda DeCardyElementary Assistant PrincipalDistinguished EducatorNational Board Certified TeacherUniversal American School of [email protected]

MAPMeasures of Academic ProgressAdministered twice a year to measure growth

Adaptive testReadingLanguage Usage MathematicsScience

Places students on an equal interval scale to help teachers and administrators target student learning

Results available immediately to teachers

IOWAITBS

Average

The RIT ScoreMeasures of Academic ProgressRasch UnIT (RIT) Score relates directly to the curriculum scale in each subject area.

RIT scores range from about 100 - 300.

Third graders typically start at the 180 - 200 level

Students typically progress to the 220 - 260 scale in high school

Normative Data

Macro-analysis to a Micro-analysis

Range of Effect Sizes in Education

Distribution of EffectsAn Interesting Normal Bell Curve

The Average Effect Size

The Average Effect Size

40% of a standard deviation

1.0 is the equivalent to a two grade leap at GCSE.

0.5 is the equivalent to a one grade leap at GCSE.

Influences with the GREATEST Impact

Self Reported GradesThe Expectation Students Set for their WorkOur job is not to help students reach their potential.

Our job is help students exceed what they think they are able to do.

Defining Effect Size Mathematically in simple(r) termsEffect Size = The average of the Spring results - the average of the Fall resultsThe average standard deviation

We can gauge not only the relative effectiveness of almost every educational intervention under the sun, we can also compare these interventions on an absolute scale of effect size.

Making Data Informed Decisions

Universal American SchoolLower Elementary Growth and Effect Size in Math

Universal American SchoolLower Elementary Growth and Effect Size in Math

2013-20142014-2015

Universal American SchoolUpper Elementary Growth and Effect Size in Math

Universal American SchoolUpper Elementary Growth and Effect Size in Math

2013-20142014-2015

Micro-Analysis

Out with the DescartesIn with the Continuum of Learning

Micro-levelMoving through the Data

Report: Class Breakdown by RIT for all tests

Micro-levelMoving through the Data

Report: Class Breakdown by Goal for Individual Tests

Micro-levelMoving through the Data

Access the Continuum of Learning for Each Student

Micro-levelMoving through the Data

Access the Continuum of Learning for Each Student

Three Sections for Each StudentReinforce LearningsDevelop LearningsIntroduce Learnings

Micro-levelMoving through the Data

Access the Continuum of Learning for Each Student

2000-2014 Northwest Evaluation Association. All rights reserved.

Micro-levelMoving through the Data

Write Action Plan with Students on the Goal Setting Worksheet

Micro-levelMoving through the Data

Access the MAP to Khan Academy Tutorials Correlated to RIT

https://support.nwea.org/khanrit

Micro-levelMoving through the Data

Report: Access the Achievement Status & Growth Summary

Micro-levelMoving through the Data

Plan for Differentiation based on the Standard Deviation

Review the Progress Report with Parents

The MAP Progress Report

The middle number is the RIT score your child received. The numbers on either side of the RIT score define the score range. If retested, your child would score within this range most of the time.

The average score for all students at UAS in the grade who were tested at the same time as your child.

The average score observed for students in the most recent NWEA RIT Scale Norms study, who were in the same grade and tested in the same portion of the instructional year (e.g., fall or spring).

Presents the growth in RITs your child made from the previous fall to the spring of the year in which growth is reported.

The number in the middle is your child's percentile rank - the percentage of students in the most recent NWEA RIT Scale Norms study that had a RIT score less than or equal to your child's score. The numbers on either side of the percentile rank define the percentile range. If retested, your child's percentile rank would be within this range most of the time.

Each goal area included in the test is listed along with a descriptive adjective of your child's score. The possible descriptors are Low (80 percentile).

ReferencesHattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Rutledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654-30298487

Hattie, J. (Presenter). (2011, November 28). John Hattie: visible Learning pt1. Disasters and below average methods. Lecture presented at Auckland University, Auckland, New Zealand.

Hattie, J. (Presenter). (2011, November 28). John Hattie, visible learning. pt 2: Effective methods. Lecture presented at Auckland University, Auckland, New Zealand.

Petty, G. (n.d.). Research and Links. Retrieved April 21, 2015, from Geoff Petty: Improve Your Teaching and that of Your Team website: http://geoffpetty.com/for-team-leaders/research-and-links/

Schagen, I., & Hodgen, E. (2009, March). How much difference does it make? Notes on understanding, using and calculating effect sizes for schools. Retrieved April 21, 2015, from New Zealand Council for Educational Research website: http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/36195/Schoolnotes.pdf