lindbergh parent boundary committee presentation

19
Parent Boundary Forum Presentation January 25, 2011

Upload: call-publishing-inc

Post on 06-Mar-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

Parent Boundary Forum Presentation

January 25, 2011

Page 2: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

CRESTWOODLONG

SAPPINGTON

KENNERLY

TRUMAN

Page 3: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

Middle Schools

Page 4: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

Concord Elementary

Page 5: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

Sappington Elementary

Page 6: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

Crestwood Elementary

Page 7: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

Long Elementary

Page 8: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

The Process

Page 9: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

GUIDING PRINCIPLES1. Middle schools need nearly equal

numbers of students

2. Elementary schools should have (within a narrow range) nearly equal percentage enrollment capacity

Page 10: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

COMMITTEE CRITERIA• Use residential (within the boundary lines) enrollment to

determine each school’s base enrollment. – (Curriculum and Instruction Department will establish placement for

special programs such as PEGS, VICC, ELL, Open Enrollment, Staff Children).

• To the extent possible, try to keep neighborhoods together. A subdivison was generally considered to be a neighborhood.

• Try not to create “pocket boundaries” that have attendance islands not connected to a school’s base enrollment area.

• To the extent possible, use major streets as boundary lines (I-270, Lindbergh, Gravois, etc).

• Be as economical as possible.

• Try to establish boundaries that will last a number of years and accommodate future population trends.

Page 11: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

• To the extent possible, minimize disruption for families already in elementary attendance areas outside of Truman.

• To the extent possible, send students to the closest school.

Page 12: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

BOUNDARY OBSTACLES & CONSTRAINTS

• Must complete elementary boundaries in order to know data needed to set middle school boundaries.

• Crestwood Elementary has greatest additional capacity for students, so process must begin there.

• Density of students (number of students per square mile) varies dramatically across Lindbergh’s 28 square miles. East side (Kennerly, Concord, Sappington) has many more students than north (Crestwood/Long) and Fenton.

• When sending students to two middle schools from five elementary schools, one elementary must split.

• Transportation is more efficient when all students living south of I-270 are together as one area (approximately 290 in all).

• It is not possible to provide a neighborhood school for Fenton students.

• Elementary schools have some variance in capacity (Kennerly – 440; Crestwood, Long, and Concord – 500; Sappington - 540).

Page 13: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

CRESTWOODLONG

SAPPINGTON

KENNERLY

TRUMAN

Page 14: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

CRESTWOODLONG

SAPPINGTON

KENNERLY

CONCORD

Page 15: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

CRESTWOODLONG

SAPPINGTON

KENNERLY

TRUMAN

CRESTWOODLONG

SAPPINGTON

KENNERLY

CONCORD

Page 16: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation
Page 17: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

RESULTS• Middle School and Elementary Guiding Principles met

– Middle School enrollments: 605 & 603

– Elementary capacities range from 90.2-98.4 percent full. Out of Resident (OOR) and staff children will close this range.

• Crestwood and Long saw largest increase in territory based on lowest number of students per square mile.

• Sappington met capacity by adding small area to South.

• Kennerly was already over capacity and will maintain its numbers by limiting OOR and staff.

• Concord is filled to highest capacity at 98%.

• Middle school split – Truman: Crestwood, Long, Concord (students living south of I-270)

– Sperreng: Sappington, Kennerly, Concord (students living north of I-270)

Page 18: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

FINAL GUIDING PRINCIPLEAnother basic tenet becomes apparent as the final pieces are put together: There will be varying degrees of agreement and disagreement on an individual family basis.

I believe these decisions need to be made based on fiscal responsibility, and doing what best serves the greatest number of students.

Page 19: Lindbergh Parent Boundary Committee presentation

CRESTWOODLONG

SAPPINGTON

KENNERLY

CONCORD