liquid crystal based optical phased-array beam steering...
TRANSCRIPT
Xiaoning Jia
Liquid crystal based optical phased-array beam steering
Academic year 2014-2015Faculty of Engineering and ArchitectureChairman: Prof. dr. ir. Rik Van de WalleDepartment of Electronics and Information Systems
Master of Science in Photonics EngineeringMaster's dissertation submitted in order to obtain the academic degree of
Counsellor: Ir. Oliver WillekensSupervisors: Prof. dr. ir. Jeroen Beeckman, Prof. dr. ir. Kristiaan Neyts
Xiaoning Jia
Liquid crystal based optical phased-array beam steering
Academic year 2014-2015Faculty of Engineering and ArchitectureChairman: Prof. dr. ir. Rik Van de WalleDepartment of Electronics and Information Systems
Master of Science in Photonics EngineeringMaster's dissertation submitted in order to obtain the academic degree of
Counsellor: Ir. Oliver WillekensSupervisors: Prof. dr. ir. Jeroen Beeckman, Prof. dr. ir. Kristiaan Neyts
iii
Acknowledgement
First of all, I am very grateful for professor Jeroen Beeckman and professor Kristiaan Neyts for
giving me this opportunity to do my thesis at the Liquid Crystals and Photonics group, and
thank you for your kind guidance and consistent solicitude in this academic year. Moreover,
I would like to give my deepest gratitude to my thesis counsellor Oliver, thank you for your
continuously guidance and enormous help during the time span of this thesis, I really enjoyed the
informal discussion with you about the practical issues regarding this thesis, and the knowledge
and ideas I learned from you benefited me and will be benefit me during my life, and thank
you for reading my thesis and providing valuable suggestions, this thesis would not have been
possible without your guidance and help.
I would like to thank my parents for raising me up, for believing in me unconditionally, for
loving me. I wouldn’t have been here without your support and love, thank you for making me
who am I today and I hope I can make you proud.
Finally I would like to thank my friends who have been by my side during the two years in Gent,
Xiaomin, Ali, Boyang, Yuting and all of the others. Thank you for backing me up when I am
down, for listening to my complaints, for sharing my happiness and sorrows.
Xiaoning JIA,June 2015
iv
Permission of use on loan
The author gives permission to make this master dissertation available for consultation and to
copy parts of this master dissertation for personal use. In all cases of other use, the copyright
terms have to be respected, in particular with regard to the obligation to state explicitly the
source when quoting results from this master dissertation.
09-June-2015
Liquid Crystal Based Optical Phased-Array BeamSteering
Xiaoning Jia
Supervisor(s): Ir. Oliver Willekens, Prof. dr. ir. Jeroen Beeckman, Prof. dr. ir. Kristiaan Neyts.
Abstract— In this article, study of a beam steering device based on ne-matic liquid crystals was performed. A blazed phase grating approximationhas been made for the analysis and simulations for the devices with variousconfigurations have been performed. Characterizations of the fabricatedcells were carried out and beam steering was observed to various extent.
Keywords—Liquid crystals, beam steering, PZT, blazed grating, diffrac-tion.
I. INTRODUCTION
IN our modern society, beam steering becomes more and morecritical to many optical systems such as fiber-optical switches
and free space communications. Conventional beam steeringdevices are implemented with mechanically controlled mirrors,prisms and lenses. These technologies suffer from disadvan-tages such as mechanical complexity, high cost, and limitedsteering speed. However, the study of beam steering modulesbased on liquid crystals (LCs) have been proved feasible andvarious configurations of such devices have been reported. Ingeneral, the working principle of these devices relies on theelectro-optically controlled refractive index of liquid crystals,writing a linearly changed refractive index profile in LC leads toa linear phase retardation of light such that incident light can bediffracted into discrete angles.
II. THEORETICAL ANALYSIS
It is well known that light is an electromagnetic wave de-scribed by Maxwell’s equations, and it can be diffracted whenincident on optical elements with dimensions comparable to thewavelength being used. A blazed grating can diffract light intoone single order by inducing a linearly changing optical pathlength (OPL). The beam steering device based on LC can ap-proximate the behaviour of such a blazed grating if the refrac-tive index profile can be well controlled, which is in this thesisimplemented by spin coating a layer of lead zirconate titanate(PZT) on top of widely spaced electrodes. Thus by selectivelyswitching the LC molecules at different positions the resultingrefractive index profile will have a blazed grating shape. Thediffraction angles of a blazed grating are given by the gratingequation:
sin(θm) = ±mλ
Λ(1)
in which λ is the wavelength, Λ is the grating period and m isthe diffraction order. To which order the light can be diffracteddepends on the maximum phase delay1 caused by the grating.Since the refractive index profile of LCs can be electrically con-trolled, the resulting output angle can thus be tuned by changingthe applied voltage over the LC device.
1The phase delay depends on the refractive index and the thickness.
III. SIMULATION
The simulation program is based on Q-tensor theory, whichcan calculate the director distribution on each point of the mesh,and then the director distribution is transformed into optical pathlength (OPL) using Matlab. The 10µm thick cell with symmet-ric finger electrodes was first simulated to study the function-ality of the PZT layer. By applying a square voltage with fre-quency of 1kHz and with amplitude V1=V2=+5V on the twofinger electrodes, the rubbing direction and the polarization ofthe incident light are both along x-direction, the OPL of such acase is shown in Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Simulated OPL profile showing the nearly flat phase profile of lightafter propagating through a PZT-enhanced finger-pattern. Its performanceis clearly much better than that of the reference cell, where in between twoelectrodes, the mesogens hardly switch, thus resulting in a much larger OPLthere.
It can be seen that the OPL of the cell with PZT is almostconstant while in the cell without PZT the OPL varies in a rangeabout one wavelength. Inspection of the electric field showsthat the reason for this is that PZT extends the electric field intothe region between the electrodes and thus the mesogens in thisregion will experience the electric field more clearly and thustend to switch.
Figure 2 shows the OPL of the 10µm thick cell for beamsteering usage with asymmetric finger electrodes and with alayer of PZT on top of electrodes. Again both the rubbing andthe polarization of the light are along the x-direction thus thelight will see an extraordinary refractive index ne at the voltage-off state, but once a sufficiently strong voltage is applied on theelectrode the LC molecules above it will tilt in vertical direc-tion and light will feel an ordinary refractive index no. One cansee that as the applied voltage increases on one electrode com-pared to the other one and the common grounded electrode, theOPL changes from a constant to an almost linearly increasing
Fig. 2. Optical phase profile of a vertical field switching cell with asymmetricfinger pattern where the finger electrodes are at different potentials.
shape, which is due to the functionality of the PZT layer. Fur-ther increase of the voltage leads to uniform switching of the LCmolecules in the whole cell, thus the OPL in the gap region andabove the electrode applied 0V decrease.
IV. EXPERIMENT
To understand the functionality of the PZT layer, the switch-ing behavior of the two cells2 with symmetric finger electrodeswere observed under polarizing microscope, with the appliedvoltages of V1=V2=+5V, shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. It canbe seen that for the cell without PZT a clear periodic structureis visible, due to the fact that the LC molecules switch differ-ently above the finger electrodes and in between them, while forthe PZT cell the periodic pattern is less clear, this is becausethe LC molecules in the whole cell are more or less switchinguniformly due to the presence of the PZT layer, leading to analmost constant phase retardation.
Fig. 3. Switching behavior of the LC molecules when the two finger electrodesare applied V1=V2=+5V (reference cell).
With a good understanding of the PZT layer, beam steer-ing cells with asymmetric finger electrodes were fabricated andcharacterized. To increase fabrication yield, six modules wereassembled on one single substrate. They differ in the electrodeperiod, i.e. the largest gap between two neighboring electrodes,ranging from 30µm to 80µm, in each of them two wires weresoldered to the bondpads connecting the finger electrodes. Thecommon electrode was shared by all the six modules and sol-dered with one wire. Cells with thickness of 10µm and 20µmwere fabricated, one of the fabricated cells is shown in Figure 5.
2All the LC cells studied in this thesis are used in transmission, not reflection.
Fig. 4. Switching behavior of the LC molecules when the two finger electrodesare applied V1=V2=+5V (PZT cell).
Fig. 5. Fabricated cell with six modules connected to 2× 4 + 1 = 9 wires.
A simple setup was built to characterize the finished cell.The setup consists of a horizontally aligned standard HeNelaser(632.8nm), a combination of polarizer-λ4 plate-polarizer forpolarization control, a diaphragm for cleaning the beam, an anal-yser and the projection screen. The LC cell was placed betweenthe diaphragm and the analyser, a linear CCD camera was usedto capture the diffraction pattern on the screen.
All the fabricated cells exhibit beam steering ability to variousextent. Figure 6 shows the diffraction pattern of the modulewith an electrode period of 70µm and cell thickness of 20µm,a layer of PZT was spin coated on top of the electrodes. In thisexperiment, both the initial rubbing direction of the LC and thepolarization direction of incident light are perpendicular to thelength direction of finger electrodes, the two finger electrodesare applied voltages V1=0 and V2=+V, respectively, with V theroot mean square value of the square wave at 1kHz, changingfrom 0 to 10Volt.
Fig. 6. Beam steering for the 20µm thick PZT cell with electrode period 70µm.
One can see that as the voltage increases, the beam is gradu-ally shifted from the 0th order to the 1st order, 2nd order and soon, until it reaches the maximum angle at 4.65◦. The efficiencyat this angle is about 74%. If the voltage is further increasedthe beam starts gradually shifting back towards the 0th order.The reason for this is that if the voltage is so high (10V) themolecules in the whole cell are switched, as can be seen fromthe OPL in Figure 2, resulting in a reduced phase retardation,thus the steering angle is smaller.
The reference cell was fabricated to compare the beam steer-ing capability with the PZT cell, and the only difference fromthe PZT cell is the absence of PZT layer, and also the refer-ence cell is 10µm thick. The same setup and method were usedto characterize the reference cell, and the diffraction pattern isshown in Figure 7.
Fig. 7. Beam steering for the reference cell with electrode period 70µm.
As it can be seen, instead of diffracted into single orders, thelight is more spread out in several orders at smaller angles, inother words, the beam steering ability is rather limited, whichis mainly due to the orientations of LC molecules in the gap re-gion not being properly controlled, leading to an irregular phaseprofile.
V. CONCLUSION
The most important results from this thesis work have beenpresented. The functionality of the PZT layer was proved tohave the ability of extending the electric field into the gap regionbetween electrodes, leading to a well defined phase profile ofthe incident light. With the benefit from PZT, the beam steeringdevice based on liquid crystals was shown to steer the beam intosingle diffraction orders, the steering angle is tunable simply bychanging the applied voltage, while the reference cell withoutthe PZT layer exhibits very limited beam steering capability.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The author would like to acknowledge professor JeroenBeeckman and professor Kristiaan Neyts for offering this re-search topic and their concern and guidance throughout the aca-demic year, and the deepest gratitude goes to Oliver who wasalways there to help and whose guidance and help have madethis thesis possible.
REFERENCES
[1] Matic, R. M. ”Blazed phase liquid crystal beam steering”.OE/LASE’94, 1994, 194-205
[2] Resler, D.; Hobbs, D.; Sharp, R.; Friedman, L.; Dorschner, T.”High-efficiency liquid-crystal optical phased-array beam steer-
ing”. Optics letters, Optical Society of America, 1977-, 1996, 21,689-691
[3] Stockley, J. ; Serati, S. ”Advances in liquid crystal beam steeringOptical Science and Technology”. the SPIE 49th Annual Meeting,2004, 32-39
[4] Wang, X.; Wilson, D.; Muller, R.; Maker, P. ; Psaltis, D. ”Liquid-crystal blazed-grating beam deflector”. Applied Optics, OpticalSociety of America, 2000, 39, 6545-6555
CONTENTS viii
Contents
List of Figures xi
List of Tables xii
1 Liquid Crystals 1
1.1 Overview of this thesis work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2.1 Order Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2.2 Liquid Crystal Phases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2.3 Anisotropy in Liquid Crystals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.3 Q-tensor Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.3.1 Uniaxial and Biaxial Nematics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.3.2 Q Tensor Order Parameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2 Beam Steering 9
2.1 Mechanical Beam Steering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.2 Non-mechanical Beam Steering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.2.1 Liquid Crystal Prisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.2.2 Liquid Crystal Lens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.2.3 Liquid Crystal Phased Arrays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.2.4 Liquid Crystal Polarization Gratings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3 Theoretical Analysis 21
3.1 Diffraction Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.1.1 Thin Surface Grating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.1.2 Blazed Grating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.2 Cell Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
3.2.1 Blazed Grating Based on Liquid Crystals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
3.2.2 PZT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3.2.3 Symmetric Finger Electrodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.2.4 Asymmetric Finger Electrodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
CONTENTS ix
4 Simulations 32
4.1 Mesh Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
4.2 Finite-Difference Time-Domain method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
4.3 Simulation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
4.3.1 Symmetric Finger Electrodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
4.3.2 Asymmetric Finger Electrodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
5 Experiments 41
5.1 Fabrication Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
5.2 Fabricated Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
5.3 Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
5.3.1 Measurement Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
5.4 Results and Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
5.4.1 Symmetric Finger Electrodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
5.4.2 Asymmetric Finger Electrodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
6 Conclusions 55
LIST OF FIGURES x
List of Figures
1.1 In the isotropic phase (left), there is no long range ordering of the molecules,
whereas for molecules in the nematic phase, one of the many liquid crystalline
phases, there is. This long-range order is often denoted by the pseudovector ~L,
the director [1] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2 Liquid crystal phases[2] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3 Liquid crystal chiral phases [3] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.4 Blue phases, left: BP I, right: BP II.[5] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.5 Uniaxial structure of liquid crystals.[6] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.6 Biaxial structure of liquid crystals.[6] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.7 Two directors and Euler angles.[6] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.1 Nonmechanical beam steering configurations.[14] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.2 Output light path of two identical rotating prims.[10] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.3 Basic structure of the LC prism proposed by Lin.[25] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.4 Beam deflection angle versus driving voltage.[25] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.5 Schematic build-up of a proposed LC-based lens[28]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.6 Focal length as function of voltage.[28] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.7 Blazed phase liquid crystal beam steering device.[20] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.8 Setup of Pancharatam QHQ: (a) and (e) polarizer; (b) and (d) quarter-wave plate;
and (c) half-wave plate.[39] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.9 Director profile in LCPG cell[34]: (a) Top-view; (b) Side-view (Off-state); (c) Side-
view (On-state); Diffraction property (d) RCP and (e) LCP polarized incident
light (Off-state; (f) Transmission of light (Off-state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.10 Ternary PG beam steering design: (a) ternary steerer design, (b) number of
steering angles and calculated transmittance versus number of stages.[35] . . . . 19
3.1 Plane wave incident on window with slits.[45] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.2 Blazed grating and its transmission[45] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
3.3 Refractive index as function of applied voltage for the nematic LC mixure E7 .[46] 25
3.4 Cell structure with symmetric finger electrodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.5 Cell structure with asymmetric finger electrodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.6 Finger electrode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
LIST OF FIGURES xi
4.1 One unit of the mesh for cell with 2 electrodes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
4.2 Yee grid for FDTD method.[48] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
4.3 Director profile of the two cells when +7V and -7V are applied to the two finger
electrodes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
4.4 Optical path length of the two cells with different voltage applied on the finger
electrodes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
4.5 Angular spectrum of the cells when applied +7V and -7V. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
4.6 Potential distribution when the two finger electrodes are both applied +5V voltage. 37
4.7 OPL when two consecutive electrodes are applied +5V and +5V. . . . . . . . . . 38
4.8 Angular spectrum of the cells when applied +5V and +5V. . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
4.9 OPL after passing through the cells with asymmetric finger electrodes. . . . . . . 39
4.10 Angular spectrum when the cells are applied +3V and 0V. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
5.1 Mask of the asymmetric finger patterns. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
5.2 Lift-off process steps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
5.3 Glue pattern. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
5.4 One of the fabricated cells, observed using two polarizers, with parallel transmis-
sion axes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
5.5 Image of the break and short circuit of the cell under polarization microscope . 45
5.6 Transmission spectrum of one cell. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
5.7 Schematic of the set up. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
5.8 Sets of voltage profiles applied to the finger electrodes of the symmetric finger
patterns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
5.9 Diffraction pattern when the finger electrodes are in applied voltage V1=+V and
V2=-V. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
5.10 Defects causing scattering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
5.11 Diffraction pattern when the finger electrodes are applied voltage V1=+V and
V2=0V. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
5.12 Diffraction pattern when the finger electrodes are applied voltage V1=+V and
V2=+V. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
5.13 Cells under polarizing microscope. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
5.14 Diffraction pattern of the electrodes at the voltage-off state. . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
5.15 Diffraction pattern for the cell No.3 with P = 70µm. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
5.16 Diffraction pattern of cell No. 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
5.17 Diffraction pattern of the reference cell with P = 70µm. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
5.18 Diffraction pattern using white light, from a Xenon lamp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
LIST OF TABLES xii
List of Tables
3.1 Parameters of the cell with symmetric finger electrode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3.2 Parameters of the cell with asymmetric finger electrode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3.3 Diffraction angle of the cell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
5.1 Thickness of the cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
5.2 Cells tested in experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
Acronyms
LC Liquid Crystal
ITO Indium Tin Oxide
PZT Lead Zirconate Titanate
OPD Optical Path Difference
OPL Optical Path Length
FDTD Finite Difference in Time Domain
FSM Fast Steering Mirror
MEMS Microelectromechanical systems
LCPG Liquid Crystal Polarization Grating
RMS Root Mean Square
BPLC Blue Phase Liquid Crystal
AC Alternating Current
LIQUID CRYSTALS 1
Chapter 1
Liquid Crystals
One of the key aspects to this dissertation is the switching behaviour of liquid crystals. Therefore,
in this chapter, the relevant background knowledge about this material and its electro-optic
properties will be given. At the end of this chapter, the reader will have a feel for how liquid
crystals can be used to achieve beam steering, a topic for which several examples will be shown
in the next chapter.
1.1 Overview of this thesis work
This dissertation is organized as follows. In the first chapter, the theoretical background on liquid
crystals will be given, sufficient to ensure the reader has the basics to understand the thesis.
This background information touches the topics of types and properties of liquid crystals, and
the Q-tensor theory which is used in the simulation work in this thesis.
In the second chapter, both mechanical and non-mechanical beam steering will be reviewed.
However, due to their many advantages, which will become apparent, this thesis will focus on
the non-mechanical beam steering that can be obtained by using a special electrically tunable
material, known as liquid crystals.
In chapter three, the theoretical analysis regarding the liquid crystal cells1 fabricated and char-
acterized in this thesis work will be given, as well as some preliminary knowledge on diffraction
theory.
In chapter four, simulations results will be discussed, first the simulation of the cell with sym-
metric finger electrodes were performed to examine the functionality of the PZT layer, then the
cells with asymmetric finger electrodes were investigated via simulation.
Chapter five presents the experiment results, both for the two configuration of cell, and analysis
based on the results will be given.
Chapter six presents the conclusion of the thesis.
1Units of functional liquid crystal device.
1.2 Introduction 2
1.2 Introduction
Liquid crystals is a broad identifier used to denote a special state of matter that exists in
between the solid and liquid phases. It is sometimes also called a mesophase, as it exhibits
physical properties from both solids and liquids. LC molecules have some translational freedom
in the material just like fluid in a liquid, and also their orientation exhibits long-range ordering
just like in a solid where molecules are usually spaced in a periodic fashion, thereby creating a
crystal lattice. This unique combination of liquid and solid phases give liquid crystals interesting
properties like high anisotropy and low viscosity. Generally the liquid crystals consist of organic
molecules that have disc or rod-like shape, and so they can be represented by rigid rods or
ellipsoids, and they can be classified into two types: thermotropic and lyotropic liquid crystals.
The thermotropic liquid crystals are formed as a result of thermal equilibrium of molecule
interactions. When the thermal equilibrium is broken by increasing the energy of the system,
e.g. heating the material, the material will experience a transition from the solid crystalline phase
into an isotropic liquid state, but in between it will have the liquid crystal phase. Lyotropic
liquid crystals however, get the long-range ordering when the concentration of the mesogen in
a solvent reaches a certain critical density. In the discussion that follows, when we refer to a
liquid crystal it will always be of the thermotropic kind, unless explicitly mentioned otherwise.
1.2.1 Order Parameters
Since liquid crystal molecules can be represented by rods or ellipsoids and they have long-range
ordering, it would be convenient to model the long-range ordering by a vector called director~L, which represents the average orientation direction of the long axis of the molecules. The
molecules have no preference to align along the long axis or the inverse because of their central
symmetry however, which means there is no difference if we turn the molecules up side down,
i.e. −~L is equivalent to ~L. The representation for the nematic phase is shown in Figure 1.1.
Figure 1.1: In the isotropic phase (left), there is no long range ordering of the molecules, whereas
for molecules in the nematic phase, one of the many liquid crystalline phases, there is. This
long-range order is often denoted by the pseudovector ~L, the director [1]
.
When there is thermal motion in the material, the orientation of the individual liquid crystal
molecules will change as well as the long-range ordering. The overall degree of how well the
molecules are aligned to each other can be represented by the scalar order parameter S:
1.2 Introduction 3
(a) Isotropic (b) Nematic (c) Smectic
Figure 1.2: Liquid crystal phases[2]
S =1
2
⟨3(~k · L)2 − 1
⟩=
1
2
⟨3 cos2 θ − 1
⟩(1.1)
where ~L is the director, ~k is the direction of the long axis of each molecule, and θ is the deviation
angle between ~L and ~k. In the isotropic state the long axis of the molecules are oriented randomly
(Figure 1.1) and thus the order parameter for the isotropic liquid is zero. When the temperature
decreases, the molecules are aligned in the same direction and the order parameter is 1.
1.2.2 Liquid Crystal Phases
Liquid crystals can be classified into different phases depending on molecule properties and the
types of ordering, including orientational ordering, which means the orientation of the overall
director of the molecules, and positional ordering, which means how the molecules are locally
structured. When the temperature is high, the molecules in thermotropic liquid crystals are
randomly oriented, leading to an isotropic phase, the liquid crystals will just behave like an
ordinary isotropic liquid, and when decreasing the temperature, different phases can be distin-
guished. Generally speaking, the thermotropic liquid crystals will experience the following phase
transitions upon cooling:
isotropic - nematic - smectic A - smectic C - crystalline
Nematic Phase
The nematic phase is typically the first mesophase to be observed when decreasing the temper-
ature, which means it has higher thermal energy than any other phase, resulting in the least
ordered long-range orientation of the molecules: the molecules do not (yet) have any positional
order, however the long-axis of the molecules aligns approximately in the same direction. Figure
1.2a shows the molecule structure of the nematic phase.
1.2 Introduction 4
Smectic Phase
If the temperature decreases further, the thermal energy will also decrease, and the smectic phase
appears, the molecules in smectic phase will have a preference to align into planes, thereby giving
it additional positional order, shown in Figure 1.2c. The smectic phase can be further divided
into smectic A, smectic B, and smectic C phases, according to the degree of order and the
orientation of the director within a plane. Different from the nematic phase, the molecules in
the smectic A phase tend to form layers, and the director within such a layer is perpendicular
to the molecule layers, so it is parallel to the layer normal. Also the molecules have rotational
freedom around their long axes. In the smectic C phase however, the director forms a small
angle with respect to the layer normal, and the rotational freedom along the long axis is lost.
The smectic B phase is more like the crystalline solid, in this type of phase the molecules still
arrange in layers, while in the perpendicular direction they are packed hexagonally. Note that
these phase transitions are reversible, simply by changing the temperature[1].
Cholesteric Phase
The nematic phase is formed when the building blocks of the liquid crystal are achiral molecules,
which is the type of molecules that when interchanging the functional groups the resulting
molecule is identical to itself, meaning the molecules have a mirror plane. When the molecules
are chiral, i.e. the molecules do not have such a mirror plane, the energy in this liquid crystal
phase will be minimum when the directors in each slab have a slight twist with respect to the
previous slab. So rather than having the same direction in the achiral case, the chiral molecules
will form a helical structure in one direction. The period for which the director of one slab
returns to its starting direction after some twist is called the pitch. Figure 1.3a shows such
a cholesteric phase, generally the chiral nematic phase can be generated by introducing chiral
molecular dopants into the nematic mesophase.
Blue Phase
The chiral molecules can also form a double-twist structure, called the blue phase (BP). It is a
mesophase in between the isotropic phase and the chiral nematic phase, the configuration of the
molecules is shown in Figure 1.3b. The existence of the blue phase could be explained, because
the free energy is lower when the molecules also twist in the second direction, however this kind
of structure can only exist in a very small temperature interval (only a few degrees). Recently
researchers have managed to extend the temperature range of the blue phase to more than 60
degrees at room temperature by adding monomers to the blue phase liquid crystal mixture and
polymerizing it [4].
The double-twist structure of liquid crystal molecules cannot extend infinitely due to the unstable
nature of this structure, thus the molecules will stack together in cylinders that then form cubic
structures with dimensions of hundreds of nanometers. These cubic structures behave like Bragg
reflectors that reflect light of particular wavelengths. Because the lattice constant of this cubic
1.2 Introduction 5
(a) Chiral nematic phase (b) Double-twist structure
Figure 1.3: Liquid crystal chiral phases [3]
Figure 1.4: Blue phases, left: BP I, right: BP II.[5]
arrangement is on the order of several hundreds of nanometers, the Bragg reflections from a blue
phase liquid crystal are ususally in the visible wavelength range (350-700 nm). The name stems
from this: the first mixture of this type was found to have a bright blue color.
The molecules of a BPLC can be packed into cubes in different ways, and according to this
different types of blue phase can be distinguished, for example the blue phase I has a face-
centred cubic structure and the blue phase II shows a simple cubic structure, as illustrated in
Figure 1.4.
Due to the blue phase liquid crystal’s unique structure, the blue phase liquid crystal is optically
isotropic in the absence of an external electric field, but it becomes anisotropic when an electric
1.3 Q-tensor Theory 6
field is present, thus it is possible to make polarization-independent devices with blue phase
liquid crystals.
1.2.3 Anisotropy in Liquid Crystals
The anisotropy in liquid crystals originates from the shape and long-range ordering of the
molecules, for example the optical properties parallel and perpendicular to the director are
different. Depending on how many optical axes (the macroscopic rotational axis) the liquid
crystal has, it can be categorized as either uniaxial (one optical axis) or biaxial (two optical
axes) materials.
In uniaxial materials, when the incident light is polarized along the optical axis, it will experience
the extraordinary refractive index (ne), and when light is polarized perpendicular to the optical
axis it will experience the ordinary refractive index no. This phenomenon in which the refractive
index depends on the polarization direction is called birefringence:
∆n = ne − no (1.2)
When ne > no, we call the material optically positive, while when no > ne it is called optically
negative. These are the two cases when the polarization of the light is either parallel or perpen-
dicular to the optical axis. When the direction of propagation of the light makes an angle θ with
respect to the director, then it can be decomposed into two perpendicular polarization compo-
nents, one of which will experience no, and the other polarization will experience a combination
of refractive index of no and ne depending on the angle θ, which is expressed by:
neff =
(cos2 θ
n2o
+sin2 θ
n2e
)− 12
(1.3)
1.3 Q-tensor Theory
1.3.1 Uniaxial and Biaxial Nematics
As explained previously, the degree of long-range ordering can be represented by a scalar order
parameter with the expression shown in formula (1.1). Assuming that the director is along the
z’ direction and we only consider a small amount of molecules enclosed by a sphere, shown in
Figure 1.5, then the director distribution viewed from y’-z’ plane is identical to that viewed from
x’-z’ plane, with an angle of θmaxm representing the maximum deviation angle between individual
molecules and the z’ direction, and the molecules are randomly distributed when viewed from
the x’-y’ plane, i.e. the molecules have rotational symmetry around z’ axis.
However in biaxial liquid crystal materials the molecules do not have an axis of rotational sym-
metry as in the uniaxial case, as shown in Figure 1.6, the director distribution is different when
1.3 Q-tensor Theory 7
Figure 1.5: Uniaxial structure of liquid crystals.[6]
Figure 1.6: Biaxial structure of liquid crystals.[6]
viewing from y’-z’, x’-z’, and x’-y’ plane, thus the light will experience three different refrac-
tive indices when propagating along three orthogonal axes, leading to trirefringence, therefore
instead of one scalar order parameter or one director, two perpendicular directors need to be
defined (the third one is orthogonal to them) as well as the two time-and-space dependent scalar
order parameter S1 and S2 along the two directors.
1.3 Q-tensor Theory 8
Figure 1.7: Two directors and Euler angles.[6]
In summary, for biaxial materials two directors ~n(r, t), ~m(r, t) and two scalar order parameters
S1(r, t), S2(r, t) need to be defined, all of them are dependant on time and space. Furthermore,
if we assume |~n| = |~m| = 1, the two directors can be represented by Euler angels θ, φ and ψ, as
shown in Figure 1.7, therefore the biaxial material can be fully described by five variables: θ, φ,
ψ, S1 and S2.
1.3.2 Q Tensor Order Parameter
The idea of Q tensor theory is to use a 3× 3 matrix to describe the orientation of molecules in
liquid crystal:
Q =( q1 q2 q3q2 q4 q5q3 q5 −q1−q4
)(1.4)
q1∼q5 are five independent variables whose values are functions of θ, φ, ψ, S1 and S2. The degree
of ordering in three orthogonal directions can be determined by the three eigenvalues of the Q
tensor λ1, λ2 and λ3, when the three eigenvalues are identical, the material is isotropic, for a
uniaxial material only two of the three eigenvalues are identical, and when the three eigenvalues
are different from each other, the material is biaxial.
BEAM STEERING 9
Chapter 2
Beam Steering
In our modern society, beam steering is an essential technique for many optical systems: fiber-
optical switches or connectors, projection displays, and free space communications.[7, 8, 9, 10]
Steering the beam into large angles without influencing other functionalities plays a vital role
in the developments of these systems.
Generally speaking, beam steering can be achieved by introducing a linear phase retardation to
the wavefront of any lightwave, in particular a laser beam, the capability of how large angles the
beam can be steered into is determined by the slope of the phase retardation profile, it is easy
to imagine that larger retardation slope leads to larger steering angles. To generate the linear
phase retardation profile a linear change of optical path difference (OPD) is needed, which tilts
the incident phase front and thereby steers the light beam. This steering can be achieved either
mechanically or non-mechanically.
2.1 Mechanical Beam Steering
The traditional approach to redirect a beam of light is to use macroscopically sized mechanically
controlled devices. A series of applications of rotating mirrors [11, 12], rotating prisms [10, 13]
and decentered lenses [13, 14] have been reported will be discussed in this section. Examples of
these configurations can be found in Figure 2.1.
Rotating Mirrors
Fast steering mirrors (FSM) are typically lightweight mirrors mounted to a flexure support
system controlled by electromechanical actuators, such as e.g. a simple stepper motor. The
motion of the mirrors are driven by actuators such as voice coils and piezoelectric devices. One
typical configuration of such a FSM is shown in Figure 2.1a.
In this configuration, a single axis hinge acts as a flexure that tilts the mirror in one direction,
an actuator is attached to the base to drive the movement of the mirror. Different types of
actuators can be used depending on the requirement of the movements speed of the mirror: a
2.1 Mechanical Beam Steering 10
(a) Rotating mirror (b) Achromatic doublet prism (c) Decentered lens
Figure 2.1: Nonmechanical beam steering configurations.[14]
high speed (2kHz) with small tilts can be achieved by a piezoelectric driver, and medium speed
for large tilt angles requires a voice coil. Note that this device can only provide beam steering
in one direction, and two-orthogonal-direction beam steering can be implemented by using two
such devices in series.
One obvious drawback of such a device is that the errors in the steering angle are doubled with
respect to the errors in the actuator since it works in reflective mode. Therefore a sensor and
feedback system is needed to correct the errors, making the system more complex and thus
increasing cost. Also the speed and accuracy is limited by the frequency response and resolution
of the actuators.
Rotating Prisms
We know that can be deflected when incident on a prism, and the output light will follow a
circular path when the prism is rotated around the incident direction of the light. However, one
major problem of prisms is dispersion, which is why white light breaks up into its components,
a phenomenon which we often observe in our daily life when light propagates through a glass
window: rainbow edges can be observed at the border between light and shadow. The origin
of dispersion traces back to the wavelength-dependent refractive index of any optical material.
Because of this dependency of the refractive index on the actual wavelength in any optical
material, no single prism can be used for beam steering for a wide range of wavelengths. The
solution to this issue is by using doublet prisms where dispersion is corrected by cementing two
prisms made of different optical materials together, such as flint and crown glass. The steering
ability of the prisms can be extended by cascading two identical prisms, as shown in Figure
2.2, the circle with radius δ at the center is the trajectory of the light by rotating one single
prism, after cascading the second prism the output light will follow another circle centered at
an arbitrary point of the first circle, thus the incident light can be steered at a maximum angle
of 2δ, denoted by the big circle with dashed lines. Figure 2.1b shows two possible configurations
of two cascaded rotating prisms.
2.1 Mechanical Beam Steering 11
Figure 2.2: Output light path of two identical rotating prims.[10]
Note that the first configuration in Figure 2.1b has a disadvantage that it will induce a blind spot
at the horizontal axis, which is unwanted in broadband spectrum beam steering applications, this
can be solved by using the second configuration in Figure 2.1b, the configuration is identical to
itself when rotated 180◦ of one prism, which means it is possible to deflect the light into 0◦ for all
considered wavelengths, thus no blind spot on the axis is generated, however this configuration
will introduce a bit more dispersion than the first one, but in most cases it is acceptable.
Decentered Lenses
By cascading two single lenses in such a way that the front focal point of the second lens coincides
with the back focal point of the first lens, the incident plane-wave light source can be steered
into a non-zero angle when moving the second lens in a direction perpendicular to the optical
axis. Figure 2.1c shows an example of such a decentered lens set.
The maximum angle in which the light can be deflected can be calculated by:
θmax = arctan
(d
2f
)= arctan
(1
2F
)(2.1)
in which f and F are the focal length and f-number of the lens, respectively, d is the diameter
of the lens. So we can see from formula (2.1) that a smaller f-number of the lens gives larger
steering angles, but a smaller f-number will introduce a lot of fabrication problems such as more
spherical aberrations, and also we can see that when the second lens is moved too much in the
vertical axis vignetting happens and part of the incident light cannot reach the second lens,
shown in the shadow region in Figure 2.1c. However to solve this issue more optical elements,
like field lenses, need to be added to the system, which gives other problems such as complexity,
poor liability and steering speed, and difficult to control.
2.2 Non-mechanical Beam Steering 12
2.2 Non-mechanical Beam Steering
As explained in the previous section, macro-mechanical beam steering suffers from disadvan-
tages such as mechanical complexity, high cost of maintenance, limited steering speed and low
inherent reliability. Therefore, it is essential to induce non-mechanical beam steering, which al-
lows random access pointing, and it can also decrease complexity, increase reliability, and reduce
costs. Reports have been made on using multiplexed volume holography [15, 16], microelectro-
mechanical systems (MEMS)[17, 18] and liquid crystals[19, 20, 21] to achieve nonmechanical
beam steering.
Liquid crystal (LC) based beam steering has valuable merits such as large optical aperture,
needing only a low driving voltage, exhibiting high birefringence and the devices can be fabri-
cated with mature available technologies. Because of these advantages, we will review some of
the state-of-art liquid crystal based beam steering technologies in this section.
LC based Beam Steering Devices
Liquid crystal based beam steering devices have been developed for many decades[22]. Due
to the the large birefringence1 of LC, light can be deflected to large angles, even with small
thicknesses of the LC devices, and with low driving voltages. The basic idea of these devices
is to generate an optical path difference (OPD) at different positions within the cell so that
the resulting phase profile will have a saw-tooth shape, leading to the deflection of the incident
light. A number of different optical devices have been investigated based on this idea: liquid
crystal prisms, liquid crystal lenses, liquid crystal phased arrays and liquid crystal polarization
gratings. The working principle of each is explained in the next few paragraphs.
2.2.1 Liquid Crystal Prisms
The concept of LC prisms was first introduced by U. Schmidt and W. Thust[23], and then
developed by several research groups[24, 25]. Based on the electrode pattern the LC prisms can
be divided into stair-case and continuous-ramp phase modulations, the stair-case LC prisms use
discrete electrodes, while the latter one uses uniform electrodes which gives it the advantage
of being more easily fabricated and controlled. One recent study presented a novel simple-
structured easily controllable LC prism[25], shown in Figure 2.3. The LC prism consists of a
wedge-like layer of liquid crystals sandwiched between two indium tin oxide (ITO) electrodes,
the thickness of the liquid crystal layer and the ramp of the prism is determined by the diameters
of the spherical spacers located on two opposite sides of the cell, the liquid crystal molecules
in the cell are aligned parallelly by rubbing the polyimide (PI) coated on the ITO electrodes.
Because of the non-uniform thickness of the LC layer, light passing through will experience a
different optical path length at the two sides of the cell, so that the incident light is finally
deflected into another angle. Furthermore, the slope of the optical path length can be tuned by
1Optical properties depend on the polarization and propagation direction of incident light.
2.2 Non-mechanical Beam Steering 13
Figure 2.3: Basic structure of the LC prism proposed by Lin.[25]
(a) One dimension (b) Two dimension
Figure 2.4: Beam deflection angle versus driving voltage.[25]
applying different voltages to the two ITO electrodes, which means that the deflection angle can
be controlled purely electronically, by applying differing voltages.
Both the deflection angles in the experiment and in simulation at various voltages are shown
in Figure 2.4a. It can be seen that the measured deflection angles are in good agreement with
the simulation results, and the deflection angle is approximately 19.48◦ at the voltage-off state,
which is due to the refraction occurring at the two glass substrate interfaces. When a voltage is
applied, the beam can be deflected in a range from about 13.75◦to 19.48◦. Another important
parameter for beam steering is the angular resolution, which defines how precise one can deflect
the beam. In this research the angle resolution is better than 0.0573◦ and it is directly related
to the resolution of the driving voltage: if the resolution of the driving voltage is improved, so
will the angular resolution also be improved.
One-dimensional beam steering and scanning can be achieved by using one such LC prism,
while by cascading two LC prisms with slope gradient directions perpendicular to each other,
two-dimensional beam steering is feasible, Figure 2.4b shows two graphs of voltage-dependent
deflection angles in the x and y directions, the difference in the two curves is caused by the
difference in the spacer distance in the two LC prisms.
Although the LC prisms have advantages like being easy to fabricate, easy to control and also
having a low manufacturing cost, the efficiency of this kind of device is low due to the losses
of the prism arrays, and further investigation and improvement of this technique need to be
performed.
2.2 Non-mechanical Beam Steering 14
2.2.2 Liquid Crystal Lens
Lenses typically work in transmission and they can change (converge or diverge) the path of
the incident light due to refraction. The phase front of the incident plane wave will experience
a different optical path length (OPL) at different positions within the lens, measured from the
center of it (it is assumed lenses are centro-symmetric), thus the beam converges or diverges
depending on the shape of the lens: if the optical path length experienced at the edges of the
lens is bigger than that at the center, light will traverse the lens near its center more quickly
than at the edge and thus will act to diverge a collimated beam of light. This can be easily
shown by applying Huygens’s principle to the exit plane of the lens. A simple conventional lens
is made of a piece of transmissive material, such as glass, and the optical power of the lens
is defined by its shape, which imposes a major impact on the behavior of the incident light,
thus the main drawback of a conventional lens is that the optical power is fixed and cannot be
tuned. Therefore, an interesting research field is the tunable lens. The idea of a normal lens is
to introduce a space dependent OPL, which is given by:
OPL =
∫ L
0n(r)dr (2.2)
where n(r) is the space dependent refractive index and L is the physically measurable length
that the light traverses, so an intuitive solution is to engineer the refractive index profile n(r)
to have a parabolic shape, instead of the physical shape of the lens. This is where the concept
of the liquid crystal-based lenses comes in, since the refractive index of the LC depends on the
voltage applied over the LC, which means that the optical power of the lens can be changed,
by tuning the control voltage. Researchers reported different configurations of such LC-based
lenses[26, 27, 28]: one approach to achieve LC-based lenses is by using parabolic electrodes[28],
Figure 2.5 shows the fabrication process of such a device. The transparent metal electrode is
deposited on the parabolic surface of the bottom glass substrate, then a polymer whose refractive
index matches with the glass substrate is injected in the sag area, and then an LC cell with
only planar top electrode is laid on top of the polymer. The alignment layer of the LC cell is
antiparallelly rubbed and has a pretilt angle of 3◦.
When a voltage is applied, the planar top and parabolic bottom electrode will generate an
inhomogeneous electric field, thus creating a gradient refractive index profile in the LC layer,
which will induce a focusing effect to the incident light, and the focal length can be approximated
by Fresnel’s formula (2.3):
f =r2
2δndLC(2.3)
where r is the radius of the lens aperture, dLC is the thickness of the LC layer, and δn is the
index difference between the center of the lens and the border, which depends on the electric
field difference, therefore the focal length is continuously controlled by adjusting the applied
voltage.
2.2 Non-mechanical Beam Steering 15
Figure 2.5: Schematic build-up of a proposed LC-based lens[28].
Figure 2.6: Focal length as function of voltage.[28]
Figure 2.6 shows the focal length of the lens as the applied voltage changes. At 0V , the focal
length is infinity due to the match of refractive index of the polymer and the glass substrate,
and the director of the LC molecules is homogeneously aligned. When the voltage is increased,
the LC molecules at the center and at the border will switch differently due to the gradient
electric field induced by the parabolic electrode, so the light will experience a parabolic refractive
index profile and lensing effect occurs, which means the focal length decreases. When the LC
molecules at the border are fully switched but the molecules at the center have no switching,
the focal length will reach its minimum value. To put it differently: when the refractive index
difference between the edge of the lens and its center reaches the maximum, the lens will reach
its maximal optical power. If the voltage continues to increase, the LC molecules at the center
will also reorient and thus the focal length will again increase, but at a slower rate.
This kind of LC lens possesses several merits, such as the fabrication process, which is relatively
simple, and having a simple electrode and a uniformly thick LC layer, which results in a uniform
response over the whole device.
2.2 Non-mechanical Beam Steering 16
Figure 2.7: Blazed phase liquid crystal beam steering device.[20]
2.2.3 Liquid Crystal Phased Arrays
The origin of the liquid crystal phased-array (LCPA) beam steering concept can date back to
the 1970s, since then numerous LC based beam steering studies were performed and different
device configurations are reported [20, 29, 30, 31], and also LC materials other than nematic
liquid crystals are used in beam steering devices, e.g. blue phase LC [32], and cholesteric LC [33].
The working principle of these beam steering devices is essentially the same however: the LC
material is sandwiched between one top planar electrode and multiple stripe electrodes at the
bottom, and by applying a different potential difference relative to the common top electrode for
each of the stripe electrodes, a sloped refractive index profile like a blazed grating is generated,
causing the light to be deflected. Figure 2.7 shows the configuration of such a beam steering
device.
The device works in reflective mode, an anti-reflection layer is coated on top of the upper
substrate to decrease the loss due to the reflection at the first interface (air-glass), the LC
layer is sandwiched between two glass substrates, the material used for the optional dielectric
mirror is a high resistivity oxide, the upper common electrode is formed by coating a layer of
ITO, the bottom electrodes are made of aluminum, under which a thin layer of transparent
resistive metallic oxide stripes are used to create a gradient electric field between the two stripe
electrodes, so that the LC molecules will switch gradually, leading to a linear gradient refractive
index profile. To give an idea on the order of magnitude for the typical dimensions of these
devices, the proposed modulator period is 5µm, the cell thickness is 15.7µm, the width of the
bottom electrodes are 1µm with 2µm gap (active region) between the two electrodes on top of
the same resistive stripe.
In the voltage-off state, the LC molecules are oriented along the bottom electrodes, but when
proper voltages are applied, due to the thickness of the cell being much larger than the width
of each active region, the electric field in the direction parallel to the bottom substrate is much
larger than the electric field between the upper and bottom electrodes, so that the LC molecules
in the active region will rotate in the plane parallel to the bottom substrate. That is, they twist in
the plane rather than tilting in the vertical direction, therefore when the horizontally polarized
2.2 Non-mechanical Beam Steering 17
Figure 2.8: Setup of Pancharatam QHQ: (a) and (e) polarizer; (b) and (d) quarter-wave plate;
and (c) half-wave plate.[39]
light incident on the cell, it will experience a change in the refractive index and resulting in
a different phase delay at different positions above each active region, which can lead to the
deflection of the light.
Note that the device can also work in transmission, simply by removing the dielectric mirror
at the bottom, but working in transmissive mode would require twice the LC layer thickness to
obtain the same phase shift as in the reflection mode. That is usually not desirable, furthermore,
the response time of the LC layer is proportional to the square of its thickness [20], so the response
time of the device working in reflective mode is one fourth of that working in transmissive mode
with similar deflection characteristics, thus making a reflective device much faster.
The experimental results shows that the device can deflect the incident light up to 5◦, however
the efficiency is very low, less than 9%, which is mainly due to the interference between the light
reflected back by the mirror under the bottom electrodes and the light incident on the mirror
in the active region of the device. The efficiency can be increased by embedding the bottom
electrodes and the resistive layer underneath the mirror, but in this approach two difficulties
need to be solved. Firstly burying the electrodes and the resistive layer may induce deformations
to the surface of the mirror which will make the optical quality of the mirror worse. Second,
there is uncertainty that the electrodes and the resistive layer can create a linear electric field
profile at the surface of the mirror, which is critical to generate a linear gradient refractive index
profile.
2.2.4 Liquid Crystal Polarization Gratings
Another approach to achieve beam steering with high efficiency is by using the liquid crystal
polarization grating (LCPG). This type of devices steer beams by modulating the polarization
of the light, rather than amplitude or phase. A few reports have been made on this technique
[21, 34, 35, 36, 37] In order to understand how this LCPG works, let’s first consider a simple
setup called the Pancharatam QHQ stack [38] shown in Figure 2.8.
The light becomes circularly polarized after passing through the first linear polariser and the
first quarter wave plate. For simplicity, we assume it is right-handed circular polarization, which
can be denoted by the Jones vector [39]:
2.2 Non-mechanical Beam Steering 18
Figure 2.9: Director profile in LCPG cell[34]: (a) Top-view; (b) Side-view (Off-state); (c) Side-
view (On-state); Diffraction property (d) RCP and (e) LCP polarized incident light (Off-state;
(f) Transmission of light (Off-state
Ein =[ExinEyin
]=[Exini·Exin
](2.4)
According to Jones calculus, the light after passing through the half wave plate is the product
of the Jones vector of the input light and the Jones matrix of the half wave plate as well as the
transformation matrices:
Eout =[
cosβ − sinβsinβ cosβ
]·[
1 00 −1
]·[
cosβ sinβ− sinβ cosβ
]·[Exini·Exin
]=[
Exinei·2β
−i·Exinei·2β]
(2.5)
So in formula (2.5) we can see that the right-hand polarized input light is converted to left-hand
polarized output light, but with a phase delay of ei·2β, when we change β (the angle between the
slow axis of the λ2 plate and the x-axis) linearly from 0 to π, the phase delay and the resulting
phase profile will change linearly from 0 to 2π. The λ2 plate can be also implemented by using
liquid crystals, simply by rotating the azimuth angle of the LC directors from 0 to 2π, this can
be achieved for example by using the polarization-sensitive alignment material and interfering
two orthogonally circular-polarized UV laser beams onto the material such that the periodic LC
alignment structure is formed, shown in left figure in Figure 2.9
At the voltage-off state, the incident light can be deflected into the +1 order or -1 order depending
on whether it is left-hand or right-hand circular polarization, the diffraction angle is simply given
by
θ = arcsinλ
Λ+ θin (2.6)
Where θin is the incident angle, λ is the wavelength of the light and Λ is the period of the
polarization grating. When a sufficiently high voltage is applied (voltage-on state), the LC
molecules will switch vertically and therefore the polarization grating vanishes, the incident
2.2 Non-mechanical Beam Steering 19
Figure 2.10: Ternary PG beam steering design: (a) ternary steerer design, (b) number of steering
angles and calculated transmittance versus number of stages.[35]
light will just pass through the cell without changing its directions. Studies show that these
kinds of LCPGs can have a steering efficiency as high as 99% [36, 40, 41, 42] and the efficiency
remains high as long as the incident angle is below 20◦[43].
Note that the LCPGs can only steer the incident light to three discrete angles, the 0th order and
the ±1 orders, the angle at +(-)1 order is determined by the period of the polarization grating,
for example, if the optical communication wavelength at 1550nm is used, the grating period
needs to be 8.9µm to achieve a deflection angle of 10◦ according to formula (2.6). For practical
use, the device needs to be combined with a fine angle steering stage to precisely control the
deflection angle.
To achieve even larger steering angles, multiple stages of the LCPGs can be cascaded [35].
Figure2.10 shows such a design, which shows a wide angle beam steering as large as 40◦, the
steering angle can be doubled by each PG stage without a significant decrease in efficiency. The
number of steering angles M can be calculated by
M = 3N (2.7)
where N is the number of stages of PGs, and the transmittance T is given by
T = (η+1)N (1−D)N (1−R)2N (1−A)2N (2.8)
where η+1 is the diffraction efficiency of each PG, D is the diffuse scattering of each PG, and R
and A are the Fresnel reflectance and absorption losses, respectively.
2.2 Non-mechanical Beam Steering 20
The PGs can also be made into passive devices, reports have been made in which they fabricated
the PGs using polymerizable liquid crystals, which is called reactive mesogen [44]. This technique
allows reduction of scattering losses and smaller grating periods [42] , which means the steering
angle for each single PG can become larger, but then the gratings are not erasable with voltage
and thus the device will always steer the beam to the intrinsic angle, which is dependent on the
wavelength of the incident light. The study in paper [42] shows that the passive LCPG can also
have a diffraction efficiency larger than 99%.
The major advantages of the LCPGs are the lack of flyback2 and reset effect in these cells,
which are the main reasons for low diffraction efficiency, and also the cell only has a thickness of
half-wave optical path, which diminishes the scattering and absorption due to the liquid crystal
itself, and the thickness does not depend on the steering angle nor the aperture size.
2The width for phase difference changes from 2π to 0.
THEORETICAL ANALYSIS 21
Chapter 3
Theoretical Analysis
3.1 Diffraction Theory
It is well know that light is an electromagnetic wave described by Maxwell’s equations, however
in general, light can be considered as a bundle of light rays, travelling along straight lines, and it
can be reflected or refracted by optical elements. This research field is called geometric optics,
but the assumptions made in geometric optics only hold true when the dimensions of the optical
elements are much larger than the wavelength of light. When light is interacting with optical
elements with dimensions that are comparable to the wavelength of light, it must be regarded as
waves, and one intrinsic property of the nature of waves is diffraction, thus it is very necessary
to have a thorough understanding of the diffraction theory.
3.1.1 Thin Surface Grating
Figure 3.1: Plane wave incident on window with slits.[45]
3.1 Diffraction Theory 22
Consider the configuration shown in Figure 3.1, where light passes through a periodic structure
consisting of windows of slits. The transmitted field through such a structure can be described
by the product of the incident field and the transmission function of the periodic structure
as predicted by Fourier Optics. Fourier analysis teaches us that the Fourier transform of the
product of functions is the convolution of the Fourier transforms of the two individual functions.
The transmission of the finite width structure shown in Figure 3.1 can be written as [45]:
t(x) =N∑n=1
t1(x− xn) (3.1)
with xn = (n− 1)Λ, and its Fourier transform:
T (fx) = T1(fx)× ej(N−1)δ/2 × sinNδ/2
sin δ/2(3.2)
where N is the number of periods (or slits), Λ is the period of the structure, fx = sin θ/λ is
the spatial frequency and δ = −2πfxΛ is the phase delay. We can see the overall transmission
function consists of two contributions : T1(fx) is the transmission function of one single period,
and sinNδ/2sin δ/2 is an amplitude modulating factor, originating from the periodic nature of the
structure. When a plane wave propagating perpendicularly towards the structure is transmitted
by the structure, the transmitted field can be expressed by:
F (φ(x, 0+)) = T (fx) (3.3)
because the Fourier transform of a plane wave is 1. 0+ in this context means it is the transmitted
field, and the field has peaks at:
fx = ±mΛ
(3.4)
which is equivalent to
sin(θm) = ±λΛ
(3.5)
where θm is the diffraction angle of m-th order, this is the case when the light is normally
incident on the structure. When the k-vector of the incident light makes an angle θinwith the
surface normal, then comes the famous grating equation:
sin(θm)− sin(θin) = ±mλ
Λ(3.6)
3.1.2 Blazed Grating
The blazed grating is a periodic structure where in one single period the thickness is linearly
increasing to a maximum, predefined value, shown in Figure 3.2a, such a structure can diffract
light into different output angles, which are determined by the difference in optical path length
(OPL) at different position of the grating. The OPL is defined as the product of the physical
3.1 Diffraction Theory 23
(a) Blazed grating (b) Transmission of blazed grating
Figure 3.2: Blazed grating and its transmission[45]
length a beam of light traverses and the refractive index the light experiences. In this case, the
grating is made of a homogeneous material with refractive index n1, and the light is diffracted
by the grating to the medium with refractive index of n2, the period of the grating is Λ and the
thickness profile of the grating can be written as d(x) = xΛd, where d is the total thickness, so
the OPL after transmission of a distance d can be described by:
OPL = d(x)n1 + (d− d(x))n2 = dn2 + dx
Λ(n1 − n2) (3.7)
It can be seen that at different locations in the grating (different x) the OPL will be different
and larger thickness of the grating corresponds to larger OPL. Assuming an incident plane
wave, then the phase after transmission through the one period of the grating, which is also the
transmission function of such a phase grating, can be described by:
t1(x) = e+j 2πλ
(n2−n1)xd/Λe−j2πdλn2 (3.8)
So the plane wave will experience different phase delay at different position within one period
of the grating and will be diffracted towards the path that is perpendicular to the phase front,
the output angle of the diffracted light can be determined by working out the Fourier transform
of the transmission function of the periodic grating, and since we are only interested in the
intensity of the transmitted light, so we take the modulus square of the Fourier transform, from
the previous analysis(equation (3.2)) this can be written as:
|T (fx)|2 =sin2(Nδ/2)
sin2(δ/2)
sin2(π(fx − f0)Λ)
(π(fx − f0)Λ)2(3.9)
3.2 Cell Structure 24
with f0 = (n2 − n1) dλΛ , the plot of this function is shown in Figure 3.2b, the first factor in
equation (3.9) has peaks at fx = ±mΛ , and is only related to the number of periods N and the
period Λ; if the number of periods increases the peaks will become sharper and larger grating
periods lead to smaller distances between the peaks. The second factor in the transmission
function is a sinc function and it acts like an envelop. It is known that the sinc function sinc(x)
has its maximum at x = 0, in this case π(fx − f0)Λ = 0, thus fx − f0 = 0, so the maximum of
the transmission function is dependent on the value of f0, which means light can be diffracted
to the direction with spatial frequency fx = ±mΛ , which is equivalent to say that light can be
diffracted to the direction where the optical path difference (OPD) is an integer times of 2π:
δ = m2π, with m the diffraction order.
3.2 Cell Structure
The goal of this thesis work is to achieve beam steering utilising liquid crystals based on the
diffraction theory as described in last section. To achieve this goal, a certain device configuration
has to be implemented. In this work we fabricated and characterized the liquid crystal cells with
two different configurations, the difference lies in the electrode patterns, one configuration uses
interdigitated electrodes (a ”finger pattern”) with a symmetric gap between the fingers on each
side, while the other cell is fabricated with asymmetric finger electrodes In each of the two
configurations, two types of cells can be distinguished, with the difference of whether there is
a thin layer of lead zirconate titanate (PZT) coated on top of the electrodes. Furthermore,
in the asymmetric finger electrodes case, there are two rubbing directions of the liquid crystal
molecules with respect to the direction of the stripe finger electrodes, more information about
these configurations of the cell will be provided in a next chapter.
3.2.1 Blazed Grating Based on Liquid Crystals
The blazed grating discussed previously is based on the variation of the thickness of medium
within one single period, so that the resulting optical path difference (which results in a phase
difference for an incident plane wave) will have a saw-tooth profile. Note that this phase profile
can also by generated by using liquid crystals, as liquid crystal molecules can respond to an
external electric field by twisting or tilting. This change of orientation of LC molecules will lead
to the change in refractive index experienced by the incident light. As explained in chapter two,
suppose the incident light is propagating along the z direction and with polarization along the x
direction, rubbing direction of the liquid crystal is also along the x direction. When there is no
external electric field applied the light will experience a refractive index of ne, when the electric
field is applied along the z direction, the molecules will tilt and light will experience an effective
refractive index described by equation (1.3), and the voltage-dependent refractive index has the
shape shown in Figure 3.3. We can recognise three different regions in this curve, at low voltage
the refractive index remains at ne because the voltage is not enough to switch the molecules.
When the voltage reaches a threshold the molecules start switching and the refractive index
decreases, the dependence is roughly linear. At high voltages the curve saturates which means
3.2 Cell Structure 25
Figure 3.3: Refractive index as function of applied voltage for the nematic LC mixure E7 .[46]
the liquid crystal is fully switched: the molecules are all oriented along the electric field, they
cannot tilt further.
Imagine the electric field is distributed in the cell such that the resulting refractive index profile
of the liquid crystal is like a blazed grating, and it can be expressed as:
n(x) = n2 −x
Λ(n2 − n1) (3.10)
which leads to the same transmission function described in equation (3.8). The difference be-
tween this kind of blazed grating and the normal grating is that the thickness of the liquid
crystal cell is uniform, while the OPL profile still resembles that of the normal blazed grating.
3.2.2 PZT
The liquid crystal based blazed gratings have advantages such as tunable diffraction angle,
however, to implement a blazed grating with liquid crystals is not easy: the phase profile of
the transmitted light has to be perfectly linear, this means a homogeneous electric field has
to be induced over one period of the cell. In reality, for obvious reasons, electrodes need to
be separated by gaps to allow appropriate voltage combinations to be applied. The existance
of gaps between the electrodes will lead to big variations in the electric field profile, thus the
molecule orientations in this gap region will deviate from the desired pattern, therefore the
resulting refractive index profile is not smooth.
One innovative solution to this problem of fringe fields is to reduce the gap between electrodes,
one can imagine that when the gap is small compared to the thickness of the cell, a better,
smoother refractive index profile can be obtained, however this approach is prone to fabrication
process errors: when the dimension of the gaps reaches the fabrication resolution limitations,
there will be a higher chance that two adjacent electrodes can be shorted, which should definitely
be avoided.
3.2 Cell Structure 26
An interesting alternative approach is to linearize the electric field by smoothening the fringe
fields. Efforts have been made by using a resistive layer in contact with the electrodes[20]. As
discussed in chapter 2 (shown in Figure 2.7), the two electrodes with different voltages are seated
on top of the resistive stripes, so the linear, gradient electric field is created above the resistive
stripes.
This thesis is based on a similar idea, where instead of using resistive material a material with
high dielectric constant was used. TO be specific, a layer of lead zirconate titanate (PZT) is
coated on top of the electrodes. Although PZT is well known for its piezoelectric effect, the
most important and the only property that matters in this thesis work is that it has a very high
dielectric constant, up to 500. As will become clear, the electric field induced by the electrodes
will be extended into the gap region leading to a smoother field distribution and thus refractive
index profile of the liquid crystal.
3.2.3 Symmetric Finger Electrodes
To understand the functionality of the PZT layer, cells with different electrode configurations
were designed and fabricated. In the first configuration, symmetric finger patterned electrodes
were used, where one cell has a thin layer of PZT on top of the electrodes, and the other one
without PZT layer was used as reference. Then, after experimentally verifiying the performance
improvement of the PZT cell, a set of cells with asymmetric finger electrodes were fabricated
for the purpose of beam steering.
Figure 3.4 shows one unit of the cell structure with symmetric finger electrodes. The liquid
crystal layer is sandwiched between two glass substrates, a common electrode made of a thin
layer of ITO is deposited on the top substrate. On the bottom substrate, a symmetric finger
electrode pattern, also made of ITO, is used (illustrated in Figure 3.6), electrodes 1 and 3 are
connected together to one bondpad, and electrode 2 and 4 are connected to the other bondpad.
Due to the transparency of the ITO, there should no diffraction pattern at the voltage-off state.
At the voltage-on state, due to the periodic nature of the structure, light will be diffracted,
with the diffraction angles at different orders determined by the grating equation. However,
analytical calculation of how light is distributed at these orders is not possible, thus we will
characterize this cell by numerical simulation and experiments, and the results will be presented
in chapters 4 and 5. Table 3.1 lists the most important parameters of this cell.
3.2.4 Asymmetric Finger Electrodes
The main difference between the cells with symmetric finger electrodes and the ones under
discussion here, the asymmetric finger patterned cells, lies in the electrode pattern, as can be
seen in Figure 3.6a. Also instead of ITO, the bottom electrodes are made of a non-transparent
metal. Similar to the cells with symmetric finger electrodes, electrode 1 and electrode 3 are
connected to one bonding pad while electrode 2 and electrode 4 are connected to the other
3.2 Cell Structure 27
(a) Cell configuration without PZT layer
(b) Cell configuration with PZT layer
Figure 3.4: Cell structure with symmetric finger electrodes
3.2 Cell Structure 28
(a) Rubbing direction perpendicular to electrodes
(b) Rubbing direction parallel to electrodes
Figure 3.5: Cell structure with asymmetric finger electrodes
3.2 Cell Structure 29
Table 3.1: Parameters of the cell with symmetric finger electrode
wavelength used 632.8nm
LC E7
no 1.5189
ne 1.7304
thickness 10µm
electrode width 6µm
electrode gap(G) 6µm
grating period(P) 18µm
PZT thickness 1µm
bonding pad, so that by applying two different voltages at the two bonding pads a gradient
electric field in the region between electrode 2 and 3 is created. The period P (distance from
electrode 1 to electrode 3) depends on the specific region of the cell under test and varies from
30µm to 80µm. A PZT layer is coated on top of the finger electrode layer to smooth out the
electric variations, thus a linear refractive index profile is formed. The rubbing direction of the
liquid crystal is either parallel or perpendicular with respect to the finger electrodes. A reference
cell with the same configuration but with no PZT layer is also fabricated and characterized, with
the rubbing direction perpendicular to the electrodes. The fabrication process of the cell will be
discussed in chapter 5. Here we list the most important parameters of the cell, summarized in
table 3.2.
Table 3.2: Parameters of the cell with asymmetric finger electrode
wavelength 632.8nm
LC E7
no 1.5189
ne 1.7304
thickness 10µm or 20µm
electrode width 6µm
electrode gap(G) 6µm
grating period(P) 30µm− 80µm
PZT thickness 800nm
Diffraction Angle Calculation
Since the finger electrode is made of metal that is not transparent, when the light is incident on
the cell the electrode itself will cause diffraction, and the diffraction angle of the electrode θe in
the voltage-off state (the liquid crystal layer acts as an isotropic medium to the light) can be
easily calculated using the grating equation (3.6), assuming normal incidence:
3.2 Cell Structure 30
(a) Asymmetric finger electrode (b) Symmetric finger electrode
Figure 3.6: Finger electrode
θe = ± arcsinmλ
Λ(3.11)
where λ is the wavelength of the light and Λ is the period of the grating. (30µm− 80µm)
In order to analytically calculate the diffraction angle of the device in the voltage-on state, a
few assumptions have to be made. First we assume the PZT layer can extend the electric field
into the gap leading to a linear gradient field, furthermore we assume the voltage dependent
birefringence ∆n(V ) of the liquid crystal is linear, so we work in the linear region indicated in
Figure 3.3. Another assumption we make is that, since the gap between electrode 1 and 2 is
much smaller than that between electrode 2 and 3, we can ignore what happens above electrodes
1 and 2, i.e. we assume there is no flyback region at the resets of the refractive index profile.
With these assumptions the diffraction angle of the cell can be calculated again by the grating
equation:
θcell = ± arcsinmλ
Λ(3.12)
Note that different from the case with electrodes, where light is diffracted into several orders,
light can be diffracted to a single order, as long as the phase difference:
∆φ =(n2 − n1)d
λ2π (3.13)
is a multiple of 2π. Then the cell works like a higher order blazed grating. The maximum
diffraction angle occurs when the difference of refractive indices is maximum: ∆nmax = ne−no,then the maximum phase difference is:
∆φmax =(ne − no)d
λ2π =
(1.7304− 1.5189)× 10µm
0.633µm2π = 3.34π (3.14)
3.2 Cell Structure 31
When the phase difference is not a multiple of 2π, light will be diffracted into the (m− 1)th and
(m− 1)th order, in this case between 3rd and 4th order. Table 3.3 list the first order diffraction
angle and the maximum diffraction angle for the grating period 30µm to 80µm.
Table 3.3: Diffraction angle of the cell
grating period 30µm 40µm 50µm 60µm 70µm 80µm
1st order angle(◦) 1.21 0.907 0.725 0.604 0.52 0.453
maximum angle(3rd order)(◦) 3.63 2.72 2.18 1.81 1.55 1.36
SIMULATIONS 32
Chapter 4
Simulations
In this chapter we will give an introduction to the simulations done in this thesis work, in order
to verify the theory and the experiments, and get more understanding of the behavior of the
liquid crystal based beam steering device. The simulation was done by first using the Q-tensor
Matlab program[47] to calculate the director distribution of the liquid crystal when an external
voltage was applied, and then the diffraction pattern and angular spectrum was simulated by
using commercial software FDTD solutions. Both of the simulation results of the cell with
symmetric finger electrodes and asymmetric finger electrodes will be presented in this chapter.
4.1 Mesh Generation
Usually in two-dimensional numerical simulations, two different meshes with different cell shapes
are used: triangles and quadrilaterals. In this thesis we choose a triangular mesh for its advantage
of being able to mesh complex geometries and it is also fast and easy to generate. The mesh
was created by the free software called gmsh. A well-written mesh is built parametrically:
by defining a few variables upfront, the mesh can be altered easily, by changing only those
parameters, without having to change the location of multiple points defining the geometry. For
the topic of interest, these parameters include the thickness of the LC layer and PZT layer,
the width of the electrodes and spacing between them. Figure 4.1 shows one example of the
generated mesh, the two electrodes are colored light blue, above which there is the PZT layer,
and on top of the that layer, there is the LC layer. Note that a periodic boundary is defined on
the left and right edges of this mesh in order to simulate the real device.
The size of the mesh has to be controlled properly: a denser mesh will give a more accurate
simulation result and a more detailed LC director distribution, but it requires more calculation
time and more computer memory. A good solution to this is by using variable mesh size at
different positions, e.g. in the PZT layer and near the electrodes, the electric potential changes
rapidly leading to abrupt changes of the LC directors near the PZT-LC interface, thus the mesh
size in the PZT layer was chosen very small, and above the PZT-LC interface a linearly increasing
mesh size is used. Once the mesh is defined, the orientation of the LC molecule directors will
be calculated by using the provided Matlab program based on Q-tensor theory.
4.2 Finite-Difference Time-Domain method 33
Figure 4.1: One unit of the mesh for cell with 2 electrodes.
4.2 Finite-Difference Time-Domain method
Light propagation in liquid crystals can be calculated using Jones Calculus, which divides the
liquid crystal layer into thin sublayers, and each layer can be modelled by a Jones matrix, by
taking the product of the Jones matrices, the polarisation and relative phase of the light can be
calculated after passing through the liquid crystal layer. However, in this thesis work we used
FDTD solutions instead of Jones Calculus, because of its simplicity. Here we briefly give an
introduction to the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method.
FDTD is a numerical method to calculate the electromagnetic fields based on finite differences,
in which time and space are divided into small intervals called the Yee grid, shown in Figure
4.2, so that the time-dependent Maxwell’s equations can be solved by iterating over the electric
field and the magnetic field in the time domain.
Figure 4.2: Yee grid for FDTD method.[48]
The Maxwell equations in a linear, isotropic non-dispersive materials can be written as:
∂E
∂t= −1
ε∇×H− σ
εE (4.1)
∂H
∂t= − 1
µ∇×E (4.2)
4.3 Simulation Results 34
We can see that the time derivative of the E-field depends on the E-field itself and the curl of
the H-field, so that the E-field after a small time interval E(t0 + δt) depends on the E-field at
time t0 (E(t0)), which has been stored, and the spatial distribution of the H-field. The similar
dependence can be found in the H-field, so that by iterating over the E-field and H-field in time
we can calculate all the values of the E and H-field at any time and space.
4.3 Simulation Results
The simulation result of the Q tensor program contains five independent variables which describe
the director orientations of the liquid crystal, to visualize the director distribution, a free software
called LCview [49] developed by the Computer Modelling Group at the University College
London is used and it can also provide information on the potential distribution and the tilt and
twist angles of the molecules at different locations. As we mentioned previously, to calculate the
light propagation in the liquid crystal we used FDTD solutions, which requires a rectangular
mesh instead of a triangular one, thus the Q tensor variable on the triangular mesh has to
be interpolated into a rectangular mesh, which is done with an in-house developed MATLAB
function.
4.3.1 Symmetric Finger Electrodes
In order to understand the functionality of the PZT layer, we did simulations on the two cells
with symmetric finger electrodes, by applying different combinations of voltages on the two finger
electrodes. Figure 4.3 plots the director distribution and potential profile of the two cells when
potentials of V1=+7V and V2=-7V were applied 1 on the two finger electrodes, with the common
electrode grounded, the rubbing direction is along the x-direction. We see the molecules above
the two finger electrodes are twisted, this is because above the electrodes the electric potential
is so large that the molecules there have to induce some twist to obtain a minimum energy
state. The difference in director distributions between the two cells is not obvious, however
the twist in the PZT cell seems to be smaller than that in the reference cell, and the twist is
believed to be responsible for the phase variations when light passes through the liquid crystal
layer. To further investigate the difference between the two cells, we plot the optical path length
(OPL = neffd/λ) after light with polarization along the x-axis 2 passing through the LC layer,
shown in Figure 4.4a, the red short lines denote the position of the two electrodes. We see
that due to the fact that molecules above the two finger electrodes switch (tilt) in the vertical
direction under influence of the electric field, the light will see a small refractive index no in
that region, in the region between the finger electrodes, the electric field is smaller and thus LC
molecules are less tilted, so light will experience a larger refractive index, and in the middle the
molecules are horizontally aligned thus light will see the largest refractive index ne. Important
to note is that in the region above the finger electrodes (denoted by the circles in Figure 4.4a) the
phase variation in the PZT cell is smaller than that in the reference cell, which is an advantage
1The applied voltage in the simulation is DC voltage.2Thus polarization is along the rubbing direction
4.3 Simulation Results 35
because rapidly varying phase variations will cause scattering when light passes through, leading
to losses. The reason behind this phenomenon is that the electric field is extended into the gap
between electrodes by the PZT layer thus the phase variation caused by the twist is reduced.
(a) Reference cell.
(b) PZT cell.
Figure 4.3: Director profile of the two cells when +7V and -7V are applied to the two finger
electrodes.
As we discussed in chapter 3, the PZT layer is assumed to linearize the phase profile between the
two finger electrodes, to verify this assumption, the OPL of the light (polarized along x-direction)
after passing through the cell with applied voltage V1=7V and V2=0V is plotted in Figure 4.4b.
If one of the finger electrodes is held at 0V, then the molecules above these electrodes will not
switch due to the common electrode also being grounded, so the light will see a refractive index
of ne and have a large optical path length. In between the finger electrodes the molecules will
switch more and more when approaching the other electrode which is held at 7V, leading to a
gradually decreasing optical path length. In this region, it can be clearly seen that the phase
changing in the PZT cell is much more linear than that in the reference cell, thus one can expect
the PZT cell will give a better diffraction pattern in the experiment.
The angular spectrum can be obtained by doing simulations with FDTD progams. The Q tensor
program output is first interpolated to a rectangular mesh, then the files containing the x, y
and z components of the refractive indices at each points of the mesh are imported into FDTD
solutions, after which the optical simulations can be performed. The light source used in the
simulation is a plane wave with wavelength λ at 632.8nm, and the polarization is along the
x-direction. Figure 4.5 shows the angular spectrum of the two cells when the applied voltage is
4.3 Simulation Results 36
(a) OPL when applied +7V and -7V. (b) OPL when applied +7V and 0V.
Figure 4.4: Optical path length of the two cells with different voltage applied on the finger
electrodes.
V1=+7V and V2=-7V3. Note that the grating period Λ in this case is 18µm, so according to the
grating equation(3.6), the diffraction orders should appear at 4
θm = arcsinmλ
Λ= arcsinm
0.6328µm
18µm≈ m2.015◦ (4.3)
(a) Reference cell. (b) PZT cell.
Figure 4.5: Angular spectrum of the cells when applied +7V and -7V.
We can see from Figure 4.5a, in the angular spectrum of the reference cell, the diffraction orders
appear at the expected angles, which are multiples of 2◦5, and the maximum intensity appears
at 8◦, furthermore, the angular spectrum is not symmetric. While in the PZT cell, the angular
spectrum is more symmetric, and the maximum intensity also appears at 2◦ and −8◦, note that
in the PZT cell diffraction orders also appear at multiple of 1◦, which corresponds to a grating
period of 36µm. The reason for this stays unknown. One proper guess might be that due to
the presence of the PZT layer, the liquid crystals respond to positive and negative voltages in
different ways, leading to a doubled grating period.
3The signs indicate that the AC signals are in anti-phase, i.e. 180◦ out of phase, but having equal amplitude4The light is incident along the substrate normal in all of the simulations.5We assume the diffraction angle is small.
4.3 Simulation Results 37
(a) Reference cell.
(b) PZT cell with εPZT = 10.
(c) PZT cell with εPZT = 50.
Figure 4.6: Potential distribution when the two finger electrodes are both applied +5V voltage.
4.3 Simulation Results 38
Another approach to verify that PZT can extend the electric field into the region between
electrodes is by doing a simulation where both of the finger electrodes are applied positive
voltages. Figure 4.6 shows such a case and we see that in the reference cell the electric field
is concentrated in the region near the electrodes. When we add a layer of PZT and adjust its
dielectric constant to 10, the electric field starts to extend into the gap region. Upon increasing
the dielectric constant to 50, the electric field is almost extended to the whole region of the
cell. In reality, the PZT has a dielectric constant of 400 − 500, thus one can imagine that the
molecules in between the finger electrodes will also switch because of the PZT layer.
Figure 4.7 shows the OPL of the two cells when V1=+5V and V2 =+5V, with the common
electrode grounded. One can see that in the PZT cell the OPL is more or less constant, which
is what we expected, while in the reference cell it resembles the blazed grating, and the optical
path difference between the maximum and minimum is approximately one wavelength, so that
we can expect the cell can diffract incident light into the +(-)1 order.
Figure 4.7: OPL when two consecutive electrodes are applied +5V and +5V.
The angular spectrum for this case is calculated in the same way, shown in Figure 4.8. We see
that in the reference cell most light is diffracted into the -1 order, at an angle of 2◦, which agrees
with the phase profile, and at the +2 order and -2 order moderate peaks can be observed. This
is because the phase profile is not a perfect blazed grating and also the optical path difference
is not exactly one wavelength. In the PZT cell light stays at 0◦, due to the fact that all the
molecules in the cell are switching because of the presence of PZT.
4.3.2 Asymmetric Finger Electrodes
A similar simulation was performed for the cells with asymmetric finger electrodes. In this case
both the rubbing direction and the polarization of the incident light are along the x-direction.
Figure 4.9 shows the OPL for the cells with an electrode period of 60µm. It can be seen that at
4.3 Simulation Results 39
(a) Reference cell. (b) PZT cell.
Figure 4.8: Angular spectrum of the cells when applied +5V and +5V.
(a) PZT cell. (b) Reference cell.
Figure 4.9: OPL after passing through the cells with asymmetric finger electrodes.
4.3 Simulation Results 40
the voltage-off state or when only a small voltage (eg. 1V) is applied, the OPL stays constant
because the incident light wave experiences the extraordinary refractive index, ne. As the voltage
increases, the LC molecules start to switch and the refractive index changes. In the PZT cell,
the OPL becomes fairly linear at modest voltages (eg. 3V). However, as the voltage is further
increased the OPL over the electrode gap region continues to decrease and finally becomes flat at
10V, this is again due to the PZT extending the electric field into the gap region and triggering
the switch there. In the reference cell, similar behavior can be found at the region above the
electrode, while at the gap region the OPL stays almost unchanged due to lack of electric field.
The angular spectrum of the two cells when the two finger electrodes are supplied with 3V and
0V relative to the planar top electrode is shown in Figure 4.10.
(a) PZT cell. (b) Reference cell.
Figure 4.10: Angular spectrum when the cells are applied +3V and 0V.
It can be seen that for the PZT cell the incident light is diffracted into one single order at 1.2◦,
which corresponds to the +2nd order for the cell with the electrode period of 60µm (see Table
3.3). This is because at this voltage combination the maximum OPL is about 2λ, as shown in
Figure 4.9a. While for the reference cell another strong peak appears at −1.2◦, which is due to
the phase profile not being very much approximating the ideal blazed grating situation, as can
be seen in Figure 4.9b.
EXPERIMENTS 41
Chapter 5
Experiments
5.1 Fabrication Process
A general introduction to the fabrication process of liquid crystal cells is given in this chapter.
Due to safety concerns and timing considerations, the author was not present for all steps of
the fabrication process, but participated in those that he could. The fabrication process of the
beam steering cells is involves mask design, lift-off, surface anchoring, assembly, liquid crystal
filling and finally soldering of conducting wires to the on-glass electrodes.
Mask design. The electrode patterns were designed with the IPKISS software. Masks that
are made with it can be easily viewed with Klayout[50]. To increase yield of the fabrication,
six finger electrode patterns are combined on a single 1 inch substrate. These 6 regions will
be called the ”active regions” for convenience. The geometry of the mask is shown in Figure
5.1a. The letters a-f indicate these active regions, with an electrode period ranging from 30µm
to 80µm. Figure 5.1b shows part of the zoomed electrode pattern in active region f, with the
typical dimensions annotated: the width of electrodes is 6µm with a fixed gap of 6µm between
them1. The electrode period is 80µm, and thus the largest non-trivial spacing between two
finger electrodes is 80µm− 2× 6µm− 6µm = 62µm. Note that this value varies for each active
region with different electrode periods, but this will be mentioned in the text.
Lift-off process. For the common electrode, ITO was used and requires a single step of
deposition. For the bottom electrode the material we used was Platinum (Pt), which is the
least reactive metal, but it resists etching rather well, thus it is more easy to make the electrode
pattern in an indirect way, rather than by etching. In this thesis we used a process called lift-off,
which is shown schematically in Figure 5.2.
The following steps are used in the lift-off process: (I) A clean glass substrate is readied. (II)
Photoresist is deposited on top of the glass substrate by means of spincoating. (III) The photore-
sist is exposed to UV light and subsequently developed such that the region where the electrodes
1The width of electrodes and fixed gap are identical in every action region and every cell.
5.1 Fabrication Process 42
(a) Mask of finger electrodes consists of six active
regions. From a to f, the pitch increases linearly
from 30µm to 80µm.
(b) Zoomed pattern of active region f.
Figure 5.1: Mask of the asymmetric finger patterns.
Figure 5.2: Lift-off process steps.
should be on the substrate are left open in the resist, while the other regions remain covered with
5.1 Fabrication Process 43
Figure 5.3: Glue pattern.
photoresist. (IV) Platinum is deposited on the whole surface, thus at the electrode region it is
attached to the substrate, while at other regions it stays on the photoresist. (V) The photoresist
is stripped away by a solution. Because the photoresist is organic, acetone is typically used to
do this. The result is that the Platinum that was on top of resist patches will also be removed,
while the Platinum attached to the surface of the substrate will stay. (VI) A final patterned
electrode is created.
Surface anchoring. Before filling the cell with liquid crystals, the alignment direction has
to be predefined. In this process a layer of nylon mixture was spin coated on top of the two
substrates that would be used to make a cell. These two substrates, after deposition of the nylon-
based alignment layer, were then cured at 180◦ for 4 hours so that the nylon was cross-linked.
Finally the substrates were mechanically rubbed, using a soft piece of cloth. The direction in
which the cloth is pulled over the substrate defines the alignment direction for the rod-shaped
liquid crystal molecules.
Cell assembly and LC filling. After rubbing, the two substrates are glued together. This
is done by using a syringe containing a mix of UV curable glue and spherical spacers, whose
diameter would determine the final cell thickness. The syringe movement was controlled by an
automated translation stage. The glue pattern is a rectangle with two openings at opposing
sides, shown in Figure 5.3. This pattern allows us to fill the cell with a liquid crystal mixture
through these openings by means of capillary forces. The glue containing spacers was deposited
on the side with nylon of the top substrate , and then the bottom substrate was attached to the
top substrate by applying pressure, which was very important to ensure uniform cell thickness.
If the cell thickness is not uniform then it would act like an LC prism and induce a phase shift
at the voltage-off state, as we discussed in Chapter 2. After this the glue was cured by UV light,
which gives a firm attachment of the two substrates. Note that the glue pattern should be large
enough to cover all the six active regions, otherwise the active region outside the glue pattern
would not be covered by liquid crystals, which is obviously unwanted.
When the cell was assembled, the nematic liquid crystal mixture known as E7 was injected in
the cell cavity. Since the cell is very thin, only a small drop of liquid crystals was needed. The
liquid crystal was filled in via one of the two openings of the glue pattern, and it would then
reach the whole region of the cell because of the capillary effect.
Connecting to bondpads. The last step of making the cells is connecting wires to the
bondpads of the electrodes so that a driving voltage can be applied. In this case we use ultrasonic
5.2 Fabricated Cells 44
Figure 5.4: One of the fabricated cells, observed using two polarizers, with parallel transmission
axes.
soldering, which could allow the solder to penetrate the PZT layer and connect more easily with
the electrodes on the glass substrate.
5.2 Fabricated Cells
In total four of these asymmetric cells were fabricated, including three cells with PZT layer
and one reference cell without PZT, each of them has six active regions with bottom electrode
period from 30µm to 80µm, Figure 5.4 shows one of these cells. However, due to fabrication
errors, some of these active regions are not functioning. After fabrication we checked these
active regions under crossed polarizers and with the microscope. It was shown that due to
improper filling, some of them are not covered fully by liquid crystals, so these regions could not
be used in experiments, and in some of the active regions there were disconnected electrodes and
short circuits between the two bottom finger electrodes, shown in Figure 5.5a. Disconnected
electrodes would not be a big problem since only the LC molecule near the broken electrode
would not be switching due to lack of electric field, while the problem of short circuits is in
theory more severe, because it would induce a current (and thus generate heat) in the liquid
crystal and the cell might be burned. To avoid this, in experiment we should apply voltages
only in a short time, but long enough for the LC molecules to switch. It was observed under
polarizing microscope that the short circuit only has local influence on the behavior of liquid
crystals. Figure 5.5b shows the switching of the liquid crystals under polarizing microscope,
electrode 1 and the common electrode were grounded, a 10V potential difference was applied to
electrode 2. As a result of this, different colors appeared in different regions. This is because
the locally switched molecules will affect the anisotrosopy of the liquid crystals thus change the
polarization of the light, and the degree of the polarization change is wavelength dependent.
We see that near the short circuit location the color is the same which means the LC molecules
above it are uniformly switched, i.e, the potential on the two electrodes is the same, however,
the behavior of the liquid crystals right of electrode 2 are not affected by the short circuit, as
can be seen from the color fringes.
Furthermore, since the steering angle is related to the thickness of the cell, it is important to
characterize the thickness of the cell after fabrication. The thickness of the cells was measured
5.2 Fabricated Cells 45
(a) Electrodes short circuit and break. (b) Switching of LC near the short circuit
Figure 5.5: Image of the break and short circuit of the cell under polarization microscope
Figure 5.6: Transmission spectrum of one cell.
before filling them with liquid crystal, by using a spectrometer: the gap between the common
electrode and the bottom finger electrodes acts like a FabryPerot cavity and the transmission
spectrum of one of these cells is shown in Figure 5.6.
By counting how many transmission peaks are there within a certain wavelength range, the
thickness of the cell can be easily calculated using the formula:
∆λ =λ2
2naird(5.1)
in which ∆λ is the free spectral range, in this case it equals the interested wavelength range
divided by how many peaks inside this range, λ is the center wavelength, nair is the refractive
index of air, and d is the thickness of the cell. Table 5.1 lists the expected and measured thickness
of the four cells.
5.3 Measurements 46
Table 5.1: Thickness of the cells
Cell No. 1 2 3 Reference
Expected d (µm) 10 10 20 10
Measured d (µm) 12.5 13.5 23.4 13.6
Figure 5.7: Schematic of the set up.
5.3 Measurements
5.3.1 Measurement Setup
A simple experiment setup was built to perform the measurement, and the schematic of the
experiment setup is shown in Figure 5.7.
- LP1, LP2, LP3: linear polarizer.
- QWP: quarter wave plate.
- PH: Pinhole.
The light source used in this experiment is a HeNe laser, emitting light at 623.8nm. The laser
is aligned by using a small diaphragm which is mounted on a translation stage with moving
direction along the light path, if the light can pass through the diaphragm when it is moved
along the light path, then the laser beam is well aligned. A linear polarizer (LP1) is placed in
front of the laser, making sure the light after it is linearly polarized along a direction that we
can easily determine, the quarter wave plate converts the linear polarized light into circular po-
larization, and thus another linear polarizer (LP2) can select any linear polarization by rotating
the polarizer, but in this setup it won’t change the transmitted intensity. A diaphragm is placed
before the liquid crystal cell to clean the beam, the cell is mounted on a translation stage which
can move perpendicularly to the propagation direction of the laser, an additional linear polarizer
is used after the cell because the liquid crystal will induce some twist when applying a voltage,
as discussed in chapter 4, causing the polarization of the light to change, which is unwanted
in practice. The voltage applied to the cell is generated by a function generator. An 8 bits
CCD camera is placed next to the laser (now shown in the schematic) to image the diffraction
5.4 Results and Analysis 47
pattern at the screen. A sheet of millimeter paper is fixed on the screen to measure the distance
d between the steered light spot and the light spot of the 0th order, the distance between the
cell and the screen is denoted D, so the measured steering angle can be found by:
θ = arctand
D(5.2)
5.4 Results and Analysis
All the fabricated cells are characterized to evaluate their performance, the diffraction patterns
are captured by the CCD camera. First the cells with symmetric finger electrodes are tested to
verify the functionality of the PZT, and then experiments are done with the cells with asymmetric
finger electrodes to check their beam steering abilities. In all of the measurements, the cells are
placed in such a way that the strips of the electrodes are along vertical direction, so a diffraction
pattern should be observed in the horizontal direction because of the periodicity in this direction.
5.4.1 Symmetric Finger Electrodes
Voltage generation. For the cells with symmetric finger electrodes, two different sets of
square wave voltages are applied, with frequency at 1kHz. First, the two finger electrodes are
applied +V and -V, by using two channels of the wave function generator and setting them 180◦
out of phase, and then the two finger electrodes are applied voltages of +V and 0V, in both
cases V is the root mean square (RMS) value and changes from 0 to 10, with a step of 0.5V.
The voltage profile is shown in Figure 5.10.
(a) +V and -V. (b) +V and 0
Figure 5.8: Sets of voltage profiles applied to the finger electrodes of the symmetric finger
patterns
Diffraction patterns. Figure 5.9 shows the diffraction pattern when the two cells are applied
voltages of +V and -V on the finger electrodes, with the polarization of the incident light along
the rubbing direction. It can be seen that when V=0V the light stays at the 0th order because the
light beam experiences a uniform refractive index of ne, when the potential difference increases,
the diffraction pattern appears due to different switching behavior of the LC molecules above the
finger electrodes and in the gap between them. For the reference cell the diffraction angles match
5.4 Results and Analysis 48
reasonably well with the calculation and simulation, which are approximately at multiples of 2◦.
While in the PZT cell besides the diffraction orders at multiple of 2◦, additional orders appear at
integer times of 0.99◦, which matches with our simulation as presented in chapter 4. This means
the grating period is 36µm instead of 18µm, and only when V=6V these orders disappear, in
fact when V is further increased to V=8.5, 9.5 and 10V, these orders also disappear, at other
voltages the orders at multiple of 0.99◦ stay there, while in the simulations, no matter what
value V is, these orders always stay there and the reason behind this remains unclear.
(a) Reference cell.
(b) PZT cell
Figure 5.9: Diffraction pattern when the finger electrodes are in applied voltage V1=+V and
V2=-V.
Note that in both cells the scattering is strong, the reasons for this scattering are three folded.
First, as we discussed in Chapter 4, the molecules above the electrodes will induce some twist
to obtain minimum energy, leading to phase variations at that region and cause scattering for
the incident light. Second, defects in the LC are formed once an external filed is applied,
as illustrated in Figure 5.10a: the LC molecules in between the electrodes which are applied
+5V and -5V will switch horizontally, and the LC molecules above the electrodes will switch
vertically, in between these regions the LC molecules don’t have a preferable direction to switch
thus resulting in defects, as denoted by the red dot. The breaks in the finger electrodes are the
third reason causing scattering, when voltages are applied on the electrodes, the LC molecules
near the breaks will not switch, leading to phase variations and scatting arises. It can be observed
in Figure 5.9 that the scattering in the PZT cell is less than that in the reference cell, the reason
for this is that the PZT layer can smoothen the phase variations of the light in the region above
the electrodes, as described in Chapter 4, thus the scattering is less in the PZT cell.
When one of the two finger electrodes is held at +V and the other one is grounded, the diffraction
grating period should be doubled (Λ = 18µm × 2 = 36µm) compared to the case where the
finger electrodes are held at +V and -V, as can be seen in Figure 4.4. The diffraction angles
can be calculated by equation (4.3) which are approximately multiples of 1.01◦, the diffraction
5.4 Results and Analysis 49
(a) Defect when applied voltage.[51] (b) Breaks in finger electrodes under polarizing mi-
croscope.
Figure 5.10: Defects causing scattering
patterns shown in Figure 5.11 agree with the calculation, in which the diffraction orders appear
at multiples of 1.01◦. We also see that the scattering in the PZT cell is again less than that in
the reference cell and for the same reason as mentioned before.
(a) Reference cell.
(b) PZT cell.
Figure 5.11: Diffraction pattern when the finger electrodes are applied voltage V1=+V and
V2=0V.
When the two voltages applied on the finger electrodes are in phase, i.e. V1=V2=+V, the
diffraction patterns of the two cells are shown in Figure 5.12, we can see that for the PZT cell
only a small part of the light is diffracted into the ±1 order, most of the light remains at the
0th order, however in the reference cell the diffraction pattern resembles that when V1=+V
and V2=-V, and three strong diffraction orders appear at −1.98◦ and ±4.02◦, corresponding
to -1st and ±2nd order, respectively. This matches with the simulation shown in Figure 4.7,
however the light spots at ±4.02◦ seem as strong as the spot at −1.98◦, this may be because
the phase profile in this case is not a perfect blazed grating shape, and the OPL is not exactly
one wavelength.
5.4 Results and Analysis 50
(a) Reference cell.
(b) PZT cell.
Figure 5.12: Diffraction pattern when the finger electrodes are applied voltage V1=+V and
V2=+V.
Figure 5.13 shows the switching behavior of the two cells under polarizing microscope when
V1=V2=+5. We see that for the reference cell a clear periodic structure is visible, due to
the fact that the LC molecules switch differently above the finger electrodes and in between
them, while for the PZT cell the periodic pattern is less pronounced. This is because the LC
molecules in the whole cell are more or less switching uniformly due to the presence of the PZT
layer, leading to an almost constant phase retardation and thus the light experiences almost no
diffraction.
(a) Reference cell. (b) PZT cell.
Figure 5.13: Cells under polarizing microscope.
5.4.2 Asymmetric Finger Electrodes
The cells fabricated for beam steering usage are tested in the setup. As we previously mentioned,
due to imperfect fabrication some of the active regions are not functioning, here we list the
parameters of the cells tested in the experiment, shown in Table 5.2.
In cells No. 1,2 and 3 there is a layer of PZT on top of the finger electrodes, whereas in the
reference cell the PZT layer is absent. The thickness indicated in this table is the thickness
as obtained from measurements with the spectrometer. ⊥ and ‖ refer to the initial rubbing
direction, which is perpendicular or parallel with respect to the length direction of the finger
electrodes. All other designs parameters for these cells are identical.
5.4 Results and Analysis 51
Table 5.2: Cells tested in experiment
Cell No. 1 2 3 Reference
Thickness(µm) 12.5 13.5 23.4 13.6
Rubbing direction ⊥ ‖ ⊥ ⊥Electrode period P(µm) 70,80 30∼80 30∼70 30∼80
At the voltage-off state a diffraction pattern is expected due to the existence of the periodic
arrangement of non-transparent metal electrodes, and the angles at which the diffraction orders
should appear are independent of the thickness or rubbing direction of the cells. During the
experiment the diffraction pattern at the voltage-off state for all cells tested was observed and
Figure 5.14 shows this pattern for the reference cell with electrode period of 70µm, for this cell
the calculated angles at which diffraction orders should appear are ±0.52◦, ±1.03◦, etc. We can
see in Figure 5.14 the measured diffraction angles are at ±0.51◦, ±1.05◦, which agree very well
with the calculations.
Figure 5.14: Diffraction pattern of the electrodes at the voltage-off state.
Diffraction patterns. The cells tested in experiment show beam steering capacity to various
extents. Among these cells, the active region with electrode period P = 70µm in cell No. 3
shows the most satisfactory result, the diffraction pattern for this active region is shown in
Figure 5.15.
In this case the polarization of the incident light is along the rubbing direction, so at voltage-off
state the light will experience a refractive index of ne, when a positive voltage (V1) is applied on
one of the finger electrodes (E1), and the other one (E2) and the common electrode are grounded,
the LC molecules above E1 will tilt in vertical direction so light will see a smaller refractive index
neff2 while molecules above E2 remains unswitched thus light will see refractive index of ne,
in the region between the two electrodes the refractive index will change gradually from neff
to ne, leading to a periodic phase grating. Figure 5.15 shows a smooth shift of the main peak
from 0◦ to a maximum angle of 4.65◦ as the voltage V1 increased. The maximum angle of 4.65◦
corresponds to the +9 order, in theory the maximum steering angle can be calculated by:
OPL =(ne − no)d
λ=
(1.7304− 1.5188)× 23.4µm
0.633µm= 7.8 ≈ 8 (5.3)
2When the molecules are fully switched neff = no
5.4 Results and Analysis 52
Figure 5.15: Diffraction pattern for the cell No.3 with P = 70µm.
so the calculated maximum steering angle is:
θmax = arcsin8λ
Λ=
8× 0.633µm
70µm= 4.15◦ (5.4)
The match is satisfactory, and the error is most likely due to the measured thickness of the
cell not being accurate. Interesting to note that as we further increase voltage V1 above 3.5V,
the main peak of the diffracted light beam shifts back toward 0◦, denoted by the blue arrow in
Figure 5.15, this can be explained by the fact that when the voltage is high, the LC molecules
in between the electrodes gap are switched because the PZT layer extends the electric field into
the whole region of the cell, as described in Figure 4.9a in Chapter 4. The diffraction efficiency
for the maximum diffraction angle at 4.65◦ is 74%.
For the cell with initial alignment direction along the length direction of finger electrodes (Cell
No. 2 in Table 5.2), in this case the polarization direction of the incident light is also along
the length direction of finger electrodes, an analyser with polarization direction also along the
length direction of finger electrodes is placed to filter out the undesired orthogonal polarization.
The voltage applied in this case is identical to the above one, the diffraction pattern for grating
period P equals 40µm and 70µm are shown in Figure 5.16.
We can see that the the cell with grating period of 40µm works better than the cell with grating
period of 70µm. This is because if the gap between finger electrodes is too large, then the PZT
layer cannot extend the electric field into the region that is far from the electrode, thus the
director profile in this region is not as well controlled, leading to a distortion from the linear
refractive index profile, in other words, the PZT can only work in a limited distance.
For the reference cell, light can also be deflected from 0◦, however the beam steering ability is
quite poor, Figure 5.17 shows the diffraction pattern for the grating period of P = 70µm for
5.4 Results and Analysis 53
(a) P=40µm.
(b) P=70µm.
Figure 5.16: Diffraction pattern of cell No. 2.
Figure 5.17: Diffraction pattern of the reference cell with P = 70µm.
the reference cell, the polarization direction of the incident light is perpendicular to the length
direction of finger electrodes.
It can be seen that as we increase the voltage applied on one of the finger electrodes, light
can be diffracted into higher orders, however quite an amount of light stays at the 0th order,
furthermore, comparing to the diffraction pattern for the PZT cell No. 3 shown in Figure 5.15,
light is more uniformly distributed at higher orders, instead of concentrating at one single order
as in the case of PZT cells, this is because without the PZT layer the director orientations in
between the finger electrodes are not well-defined, thus the resulting phase profile when light
passes through is deviated from the linear shape, causing the light to be to diffracted into
multiple orders.
The experiment is also performed with a white light source. It will be diffracted because the
dimension of the finger electrodes is comparable with the wavelengths under consideration,
however, since the white light source is incoherent, the interference from different diffraction
5.4 Results and Analysis 54
contributions would not happen, thus a slowly shifting white spot is expected. Figure 5.18
shows the diffraction pattern using a Xenon lamp.
Figure 5.18: Diffraction pattern using white light, from a Xenon lamp.
We see that different from what we expected, white light is split into colored strips due to
dispersion, i.e. different light components with different wavelengths will experience different
phase retardation for the same cell, leading to different diffraction angles. Furthermore, when
the voltage exceeds 4.5V, the diffracted light shifts back towards 0◦, due to the molecules in the
whole cell being fully switched.
CONCLUSIONS 55
Chapter 6
Conclusions
Beam steering cells based on liquid crystals were studied, both theoretically and experimentally.
First, cells with symmetric finger electrodes were characterized to understand the functionality
of a PZT layer, a layer made of a material with a high dielectric constant. Both the simulation
and experiment showed that the PZT layer can reduce rapid phase variations and thus decrease
scattering, by extending the electric field into the region between finger electrodes where the
electric field is usually no longer strong enough to lead to the switching of the mesogens. This
leads to a nicely defined orientation profile of liquid crystal directors, thus the incident light will
experience a (more or less) linear phase retardation.
Then the cells with asymmetric finger electrodes are investigated for beam steering usage, all
these cells exhibit beam steering ability to various extent. An improvement of the beam steering
ability for the PZT cell compared to the reference cell was observed, due to the well controlled
phase profile of the incident light in the gap between the finger electrodes. The PZT cell with
thickness of 20µm and with grating period of 70µm gave a maximum steering angle of 4.65◦.
Comparing the PZT cells with grating periods of 40µm and 70µm led to the conclusion that
the PZT layer only has a limited working distance and thus the design parameters, such as PZT
layer thickness and LC layer thickness, need to be considered on a per application basis.
In conclusion, beam steering based on liquid crystals has been demonstrated and it is shown
that simply by spin coating a layer of PZT on top of the finger electrodes the beam steering
capability of the cells can be strongly improved, and the cell configuration investigated in this
thesis work only requires two finger electrodes, which is an advantage in both the fabrication
process as well as during operation.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 56
Bibliography
[1] Jan Danckaert Kristiaan Neyts. Optical Materials. Gent University, 2013.
[2] Jeroen Beeckman Kristiaan Neyts. Tutorials on liquid crystals. http://lcp.elis.ugent.
be/tutorials/lc.
[3] Hirotsugu Kikuchi. Liquid crystalline blue phases. In Liquid crystalline functional assem-
blies and their supramolecular structures, pages 99–117. Springer, 2008.
[4] Harry J Coles and Mikhail N Pivnenko. Liquid crystal blue phase with a wide temperature
range. Nature, 436(7053):997–1000, 2005.
[5] Harry Coles. Introduction to liquid crystals. http://www-g.eng.cam.ac.uk/CMMPE/
lcintro2.html.
[6] Nigel J Mottram and Christopher JP Newton. Introduction to q-tensor theory. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1409.3542, 2014.
[7] Paul F McManamon, Edward A Watson, Terry A Dorschner, and Lawrence J Barnes.
Applications look at the use of liquid crystal writable gratings for steering passive radiation.
Optical engineering, 32(11):2657–2664, 1993.
[8] Paul F McManamon, Terry A Dorschner, David L Corkum, Larry J Friedman, Douglas S
Hobbs, Michael Holz, Sergey Liberman, Huy Q Nguyen, Daniel P Resler, Richard C Sharp,
et al. Optical phased array technology. Proceedings of the IEEE, 84(2):268–298, 1996.
[9] Edward A Watson, Donald T Miller, and Paul F McManamon. Applications and require-
ments for nonmechanical beam steering in active electro-optic sensors. In Optoelectronics’
99-Integrated Optoelectronic Devices, pages 216–225. International Society for Optics and
Photonics, 1999.
[10] Bradley D Duncan, Philip J Bos, and Vassili Sergan. Wide-angle achromatic prism beam
steering for infrared countermeasure applications. Optical Engineering, 42(4):1038–1047,
2003.
[11] Qingkun Zhou, Pinhas Ben-Tzvi, Dapeng Fan, and Andrew A Goldenberg. Design of
fast steering mirror systems for precision laser beams steering. In Robotic and Sensors
Environments, 2008. ROSE 2008. International Workshop on, pages 144–149. IEEE, 2008.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 57
[12] Michael N Sweeney, Gerald A Rynkowski, Mehrdad Ketabchi, and Robert Crowley. Design
considerations for fast-steering mirrors (fsms). In International Symposium on Optical
Science and Technology, pages 63–73. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2002.
[13] Jennifer L Gibson, Bradley D Duncan, Phil Bos, and Vasa Sergen. Wide-angle beam steering
for infrared countermeasures applications. In AeroSense 2002, pages 100–111. International
Society for Optics and Photonics, 2002.
[14] Jennifer L Gibson, Bradley D Duncan, Edward A Watson, and John S Loomis. Wide-
angle decentered lens beam steering for infrared countermeasures applications. Optical
Engineering, 43(10):2312–2321, 2004.
[15] Jean Pierre Huignard, Anne-Marie Roy, and Christian Slezak. Electro-optical deflection
apparatus using holographic grating, September 14 1976. US Patent 3,980,389.
[16] Irl W Smith and Michael Karl Oskar Holz. Wide-angle beam steering system, May 8 2007.
US Patent 7,215,472.
[17] Peter F Van Kessel, Larry J Hornbeck, Robert E Meier, and Michael R Douglass. A
mems-based projection display. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(8):1687–1704, 1998.
[18] U Krishnamoorthy, K Li, K Yu, D Lee, JP Heritage, and O Solgaard. Dual-mode micromir-
rors for optical phased array applications. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 97:21–26,
2002.
[19] Jay Stockley and Steven Serati. Advances in liquid crystal beam steering. In Optical
Science and Technology, the SPIE 49th Annual Meeting, pages 32–39. International Society
for Optics and Photonics, 2004.
[20] Roy M Matic. Blazed phase liquid crystal beam steering. In OE/LASE’94, pages 194–205.
International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1994.
[21] Gregory P Crawford, James N Eakin, Marc D Radcliffe, Andrew Callan-Jones, and
Robert A Pelcovits. Liquid-crystal diffraction gratings using polarization holography align-
ment techniques. journal of Applied Physics, 98(12):123102, 2005.
[22] Adrian Forrest Fray and David Jones. Liquid crystal light deflector, January 3 1978. US
Patent 4,066,334.
[23] Uwe Schmidt and Walter Thust. Optical deflection system including an alternating sequence
of birefringent prisms and polarizers, March 30 1971. US Patent 3,572,895.
[24] Hongwen Ren, Yun-Hsing Fan, and Shin-Tson Wu. Prism grating using polymer stabilized
nematic liquid crystal. Applied physics letters, 82(19):3168–3170, 2003.
[25] Xu Lin, Huang Zi-Qiang, and Yang Ruo-Fu. Programmable agile beam steering based on
a liquid crystal prism. Chinese Physics B, 20(11):114216, 2011.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 58
[26] Jiyoon Kim, Jonghyun Kim, Jun-Hee Na, Byoungho Lee, and Sin-Doo Lee. Liquid crystal-
based square lens array with tunable focal length. Optics express, 22(3):3316–3324, 2014.
[27] Yan Li and Shin-Tson Wu. Polarization independent adaptive microlens with a blue-phase
liquid crystal. Optics express, 19(9):8045–8050, 2011.
[28] Hongwen Ren, Yun-Hsing Fan, Sebastian Gauza, and Shin-Tson Wu. Tunable-focus flat
liquid crystal spherical lens. Applied physics letters, 84(23):4789–4791, 2004.
[29] DP Resler, DS Hobbs, RC Sharp, LJ Friedman, and TA Dorschner. High-efficiency liquid-
crystal optical phased-array beam steering. Optics letters, 21(9):689–691, 1996.
[30] Bruce Winker, Milind Mahajan, and Matthew Hunwardsen. Liquid crystal beam directors
for airborne free-space optical communications. In Aerospace Conference, 2004. Proceedings.
2004 IEEE, volume 3. IEEE, 2004.
[31] Xu Wang, Daniel Wilson, Richard Muller, Paul Maker, and Demetri Psaltis. Liquid-crystal
blazed-grating beam deflector. Applied Optics, 39(35):6545–6555, 2000.
[32] Jin Yan, Yan Li, and Shin-Tson Wu. High-efficiency and fast-response tunable phase grating
using a blue phase liquid crystal. Optics letters, 36(8):1404–1406, 2011.
[33] Hung-Chang Jau, Tsung-Hsien Lin, Yan-Yu Chen, Chun-Wei Chen, Jui-Hsiang Liu, and
Andy Y-G Fuh. Direction switching and beam steering of cholesteric liquid crystal gratings.
Applied Physics Letters, 100(13):131909, 2012.
[34] Jihwan Kim, Chulwoo Oh, Michael J Escuti, and Steve Serati. Wide-angle nonmechanical
beam steering using thin liquid crystal polarization gratings. In Optical Engineering+
Applications, pages 709302–709302. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2008.
[35] Jihwan Kim, Chulwoo Oh, Steve Serati, and Michael J Escuti. Wide-angle, nonmechanical
beam steering with high throughput utilizing polarization gratings. Applied optics, 50(17):
2636–2639, 2011.
[36] Michael J Escuti and W Michael Jones. 39.4: Polarization-independent switching with high
contrast from a liquid crystal polarization grating. In SID Symposium Digest of Technical
Papers, volume 37, pages 1443–1446. Wiley Online Library, 2006.
[37] Jihwan Kim, Matthew N Miskiewicz, Steve Serati, and Michael J Escuti. Demonstration of
large-angle nonmechanical laser beam steering based on lc polymer polarization gratings.
In SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing, pages 80520T–80520T. International Society for
Optics and Photonics, 2011.
[38] S Pancharatnam. Achromatic combinations of birefringent plates. In Proceedings of the
Indian Academy of Sciences-Section A, volume 41, pages 137–144. Springer, 1955.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 59
[39] Paul F McManamon, Philip J Bos, Michael J Escuti, Jason Heikenfeld, Steve Serati, Huikai
Xie, and Edward A Watson. A review of phased array steering for narrow-band electroop-
tical systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 97(6):1078–1096, 2009.
[40] Michael J Escuti and W Michael Jones. A polarization-independent liquid crystal spatial
light modulator. In SPIE Optics+ Photonics, pages 63320M–63320M. International Society
for Optics and Photonics, 2006.
[41] Ravi K Komanduri, W Michael Jones, Chulwoo Oh, and Michael J Escuti. Polarization-
independent modulation for projection displays using small-period lc polarization gratings.
Journal of the Society for Information Display, 15(8):589–594, 2007.
[42] Michael J Escuti, Chulwoo Oh, Carlos Sanchez, Cees Bastiaansen, and Dirk J Broer. Sim-
plified spectropolarimetry using reactive mesogen polarization gratings. In SPIE Optics+
Photonics, pages 630207–630207. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2006.
[43] Chulwoo Oh and Michael J Escuti. Numerical analysis of polarization gratings using the
finite-difference time-domain method. Physical Review A, 76(4):043815, 2007.
[44] Stephen M Kelly. Anisotropic networks. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 5(12):2047–2061,
1995.
[45] Heidi Ottevaere Dries Van Thourhout, Roel Baets. Microphotonics. Gent University, 2013.
[46] Yannick Dylst. Multi-electrode electro-optic beam steering. Master Thesis at UGent, 2013.
[47] Richard William Llewellyn James. Modelling of high resolution liquid crystal devices. PhD
thesis, University College London (University of London), 2006.
[48] Kane S Yee et al. Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwells
equations in isotropic media. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag, 14(3):302–307, 1966.
[49] UCL Computer Modelling Group. Lcview. http://www.ee.ucl.ac.uk/~rjames/
modelling/visualisation/.
[50] Klayout Inc. Klayout. http://www.klayout.de/.
[51] The Complex Fluids and Molecular Biophysics Lab. Topological defects in liquid crystals.
http://physics.litasegr.unimi.it/extras/temidottorato1_08.html.