7/25/2019 List of Cases for Remedial Law Review

1/1

List of Cases for Remedial Law Review 1(Midterms)

Exemption to the general rule on venue

1) Tumpag vs. Tumpag G.R. o.1!!1""# $eptem%er &!' &1&) *riones vs. C+ G.R. o. ,anuar- 1' &1

/ifferen0e %etween failure to state 0ause of a0tion2 3 la04 of 0ause of a0tion2 as a ground formotion to dismiss

") Lourdes $uites vs. *inaro G.R. o. &5&!# +ugust 6' &1

Re7uisites for a taxpa-er8s suit (9)

) Land *an4 of the :hilippines v. Ca0a-uran G.R. o. 1!1665# +pril 15' &1"

Transfer of interest

) G.R. o. 1!5 ;0to%er &&' &1

Letter is ;T an initiator- pleading

6) Monsanto vs. Lim 3 /e Guarsona Medi0al Clini0 vs. :hilippine Dealth nsuran0e Corp. G.R. o. 1!1& ;0to%er

1"' &1$:+# +uthorit- must %e spe0ifi0 3 must pertain onl- to administrative matters.

1) +%oiti< E7uit- Aentures' n0. vs. Chiong%ian' Gothong 3 C+GL G.R. o. 1!5"# ,ul- !'&1

hen there is same identit- of partiesF

Counter0laim

11) /io 3 D.$. E7uities' LT/. vs. $u%i0 *a- Marine Exploratorium' n0. G.R. o. 1=!",une 11' &1

/ifferen0e %etween the dismissal of an a0tion2 and dismissal of a 0omplaint2

1&) Chuan vs. - G.R. o. 151# Mar0h 11' &1

ntervention (9)

1") :ulgar vs. RTC G.R. o.15="# $eptem%er 1' &1

"@da- noti0e rule (motion)

1) Mi0rosoft Corp. vs. BaraHallah G.R. o. &=# $eptem%er 1' &1

Biling for motion for new trial is tantamount to voluntar- appearan0e

1) /e :edro vs. Romasan /evelopment Corp. G.R. o. 1!51# ovem%er &6' &1

Return of $heriff must %e spe0ifi0

16) :rudential *an4 (*:) vs. Magdamit G.R. o. 1="5!# ovem%er 1&' &115) *enedi0t 3 Manuel vs. ;ng G.R. o. &&!# ;0to%er 1' &1

1=) ;ng vs. Co G.R. o. &66"# Be%ruar- &' &1

&@/ismissal rule

19) Ching vs Cheng G.R. o. 155# ;0to%er =' &1