list of green concept contractors worldwide

7/27/2019 List of Green Concept Contractors Worldwide

1/6

Green Building Spreads SlowlyThe market is steady, but many contractors are beginning to see a shift

in how green construction is perceived and measured by Gary J. Tulaczenr.com September 17, 2012 ENR 1

Overviewp. 2 //Green Market by Sectorp. 2 //Top 5 Green Contractors by Sectorp. 3 //Beta-Testing LEED 4.0p. 4 //How To Read the Tablesp. 4 //The ENR Top 100 Green Contractors list p. 5 //

NUMBER13

A WORK OF ARTStructure Tones subsidiary, L.F.

Driscoll Co., built the Barnes Founda-tion art gallery in Philadelphia. The

gallery was designed by Tod Williams

Billie Tsien Architects. The project ispursuing LEED Platinum certifcation.

PHOTOBYTOM

CRANE/L.F.

DRISCOLL/STRUCTURETONE


2/6

Green building is on the rise for large contractors.

Evidence of the increasing interest in green construc-tion can be seen in the numbers from ENRs Top 100Green Contractors list. As a group, the Top 100 gener-ated $46.53 billion in contracting revenue in 2011 fromprojects registered with, and actively seeking certica-tion from, third-party ratings groups under objectivesustainable-design standards, such as the U.S. Green

Building Councils Leadership in Energy and Environ-

mental Design, or LEED, standards. For the group,this total is a 4.4% uptick over $ 44.41 billion in 2010.

Domestically, green contracting revenue rose 3.8%,to $44.31 billion, in 2011 from $42.68 billion in 2010.The Top 100 had $2.22 billion in revenue from greenprojects outside the U.S. in 2011, up 28.3%, from

$1.73 billion, in 2010.The Top 100s revenue from green contracting rep-

resented 38.0% of the groups total contracting reve-nue in 2011. Slightly lower than the 40.0% in 2010,

this percentage is still signicant.Looking at the big picture, green construction

continues to grow both in our revenue and in the per-centage of our projects, says Michael H. Deane, vicepresident of sustainable construction for Turner Con-struction. He says 2011 was the third consecutive yearthat sustainable projects accounted for over 50% of therms projects. And over 50% of these sustainable

projects are targeting LEED Gold or Platinum, he

adds. He says Turner is building at least a half-dozen

net-zero buildings.Deane goes on to say that sustainable construction

has branched into new markets, noting, We are seeinginterest in green construction in every type of buildingwe work on. He says Turner is working on data cen-

Green Market by Sector

ters, stadiums and even airports that are pursuing

LEED certication.Further, sustainable construction is reaching

beyond the general building market. In 2011, Gray

Construction worked on manufacturing projects pur-suing LEED certication for Caterpillar, Siemens and

Mitsubishi, says Stephen Gray, CEO. If anything, wesee the recession driving the desire to reduce the costof doing business by creating more sustainable and

energy-efcient buildings, he says.For many clients, building green is a business ne-

cessity. Those building in todays market are investingin their own corporate portfolios and recognize that

sustainability in buildings is an investment rather thana cost. Even for speculative projects ... LEED Gold

and Platinum are seen as required differentiators, saysPhil Williams, vice president of Webcor Builders.

The energy savings generated from sustainable de-sign has prompted clients to ask for green buildings.

But some people in the industry see other, softer ben-ets making green building attractive. The Millennial

Generation gravitates toward companies dedicated tosustainability and is willing to bear a portion of the costburden for sustainability, says Gray. These issues area matter of pragmatics, and I see this becoming stan-dard operating practice, he says.

However, not all owners are interested in LEED

certication. We continue to see a minimum requestof practical sustainable design and construction ap-

proaches incorporated into all of our projects. [But]

we are seeing a slight decrease in requests for certiedbuildings, says Paul Todd Merrill, director of sustain-able construction for Clayco.

The large corporations and institutional investors

Those

building in

todays market

are investing in

their own

corporate

portfolios and

recognize that

sustainability

in buildings is

an investment

rather than a

cost.

Phil Williams,

vice president,

Webcor Builders

CommercialOffices$5,434.0 11.7%

Source: McGraw-Hill ConstructionResearch & Analytics / ENR.

(Measured $ millions)

Total 2011 Revenue = $46.5 billion

Airports$907.5 2.0%

Health Care$8,720.1 18.7%

Education$9,677.4 20.8%

Telecom$2,725.1 5.9%

Hotels$977.7 2.1%

Multi-UnitResidential$2,355.9 5.1%

OtherBuildings$2,483.1 5.3%

Sports, Civic,and Ent.$2,478.3 5.3%

Non-BuildingMisc.$1,417.0 3.1%

GovernmentOffices$7,469.0 16.1%

Industrial andManufacturing$1,353.9 2.9%

Retail$528.3 1.1%

THE TOP 100 GREEN CONTRACTORS OVERVIEW

enr.com September 17, 2012 ENR 2


3/6


now are using LEED as a touchstone in managing

their projects, says Elizabeth Heider, a senior vicepresident at Skanska who currently chairs the USGBCboard of directors. But it is in the smaller projects oron projects where money is tight that we have seen

some slippage.

Not the Only Game in Town

For some owners, LEED is no longer the only option.There have been some recent developments at the

U.S. General Services Administration questioning theuse of LEED as a rating system for their properties

compared to the alternative rating system of Green

Globes, says Daniel J. Osterman, sustainability men-tor committee chairman at Sundt Construction. GreenGlobes is a green-building assessment tool licensed tothe Green Building Initiative, Portland, Ore.

There have been rumblings concerning LEED in

other areas. This spring, the U.S. Dept. of Defense

announced it would be requiring on federal building

projects the use not only of LEED but also the Amer-ican Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-

Conditioning Engineers Standard 189.1, which also

covers the design of high-performance sustainable

buildings. Many LEED advocates worried this move

might be a sign the DOD is shying away from LEED,

but most contractors believe LEED and ASHRAE are

complementary.On the other hand, the federal DOD spending re-

authorization bill, H. R. 1540, barred the DOD fromspending federal funds for LEED Gold or Platinum

certication. Now, all Defense Dept. [contract] so-

licitations no longer are permitted to require higher

than a LEED Silver rating. You can build a project toLEED Gold standards, but the Defense Dept. is barredfrom paying extra for the higher rating, says Jeff

Harper, CEO of Harper Construction. However,

Harper says his rm has completed 12 LEED Plati-

num buildings for the DOD in the past year.

Another controversy concerning LEED wasUSGBCs decision in June to defer its decision on

whether to adopt LEEDs revamped 4.0 standard. Oneelement of the proposed standard calls for the avoid-ance of chemicals of concern, as dened by the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, in its requirementsfor better indoor-air quality. This item would affect

common chemicals used in vinyls and ame retardants.This item is being fought by the chemical industry

as arbitrary, costly and unneeded. The chemical indus-try also lobbied GSA, one of the largest single entitiesthat require LEED certication, to reject LEED 4.0

if it were adopted as written. As a result of industry

Now, all

Defense Dept.

[contract]

solicitations no

longer are

permitted to

require higher

than a LEED

Silver rating.

Jeff Harper,

CEO, Harper

Construction Co.

COMMERCIAL OFFICES

RANK F IRM

$ MIL.

REVENUE

1 THE TURNER CORP. 708.8

2 STRUCTURE TONE 371.4

3 DAVID E. HARVEY BUILDERS INC. 354.3

4 CLAYCO INC. 311.0

5 HOLDER CONSTRUCTION CO. 278.0

HEALTH CARE

RANK F IRM$ MIL.

REVENUE

1 THE TURNER CORP. 1,056.3

2 GILBANE BUILDING CO. 826.6

3 CLARK GROUP 701.7

4 PCL CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES INC. 600.8

5 BARTON MALOW CO. 553.8

SPORTS, ENTERTAINMENT & CIVIC

RANK F IRM$ MIL.

REVENUE

1 HUNT CONSTRUCTION GROUP 368.8


3 PCL CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES INC. 232.5

4 MORTENSON CONSTRUCTION 182.3

5 PEPPER CONSTRUCTION GROUP 130.9

EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES

RANK FIRM

$ MIL.

REVENUE

1 THE TURNER CORP. 1,098.7

2 GILBANE BUILDING CO. 927.9

3 THE WHITING-TURNER CONTRACTING CO. 559.0

4 BALFOUR BEATTY US 440.4

5 SKANSKA USA 398.0

MANUFACTURING & INDUSTRIAL

RANK FIRM$ MIL.

REVENUE


2 GRAY CONSTRUCTION 271.2

3 WALBRIDGE 161.4

4 DPR CONSTRUCTION 107.8


GREEN CONTRACTOR REVENUE $ MIL.

Source: ENR. (Measured in $ billions)

2008$38.7

2009$43.1

2010$44.4

2011$46.5

GOVERNMENT OFFICES

RANK FIRM

$ MIL.

REVENUE

1 CLARK GROUP 799.2

2 HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO. 534.6

3 MANHATTAN CONSTRUCTION GROUP 524.8

4 B.L. HARBERT INTERNATIONAL LLC 504.4

5 BALFOUR BEATTY US 376.6

MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL

RANK FIRM$ MIL.

REVENUE


2 CLARK GROUP 203.6

3 THE WALSH GROUP LTD. 178.2

4 HARPER CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. 153.1

5 THE WALSH GROUP 153.0

RETAIL

RANK FIRM$ MIL.

REVENUE

1 JACOBSEN CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. 118.2

2 DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC. 100.0

3 THE WEITZ CO. 49.1


5 DAVID E. HARVEY BUILDERS INC. 42.3

Top 5 Green Contractors by Sector


#54SELLEN CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.is renovating Seatt les 1906 KingStreet station, now an AMTRAK depot,to LEED Platinum.


4/6


pressure and thousands of member comments on theproposal, USGBC agreed to review the standard anddefer possible adoption until mid-2013.

However, many people in the industry say the

chemicals-of-concern provision should be seriouslyconsidered. Heider argues that LEED 4.0 may actuallybe a bigger money-saver for owners than the energy

savings from the current version. The industry has

made energy savings a major selling point for LEED.But shifting the focus to a healthier work environmentwould mean higher productivity and less lost time to

illnesses. Heider says measuring these savings may bebased on a softer metric, but the gains have the

potential to be enormous.Heider also points out that moving away from these

potentially harmful chemicals may be an opportunity

for the chemical industry. In 2000, there was a majorcontroversy about USGBCs move to eliminate volatileorganic compounds from the construction process. Butit passed, and the chemical industry responded with

new and innovative alternatives, she says.Sustainable construction expansion has had some

interesting effects. Many contractors have touted as amarketing point their experience in building green.

But now, it is harder to rely on sustainable design andconstruction as a differentiator. With more clients in-terested in and demanding green, all contractors havebecome pretty adept at providing it, says Christopher

Day, vice president of Swinerton Builders.On the other hand, green contractors nd their

processes have improved. Making changes to our

practices to meet LEED requirements has us asking

ourselves why [we] would want to go back to doing

things the old way when we have advanced so far in

our sustainable practices, says Merrill of Clayco.As green building has matured, more participants

in the construction process have signed on, making theprocess itself run more smoothly. Years ago, we had

to educate subcontractors and vendors about sustain-able construction, says Gray. Today, more and more

Living Buildings

Skanska (No. 7)is owners rep on the Chesapeake Bay Foundations

Virginia Beach conservation center. The facility is planned to meet LivingBuild standards and wil l beta-test LEED 4.0. On Aug. 23, CBF named

SmithGroupJJR as architect and Hourigan Construction as contractor.

Beta-Testing LEED 4.0

of our subcontractors, vendors, manufacturers and

other industry folks are up to speed on sustainability.Many green-building experts believe green

construction will continue to expand and evolve. Per-

formance disclosure may provide the next big boost togreen construction, says Laura DArdenne, managerof sustainable construction at PCL Construction.

DArdenne says performance disclosure, which hasbeen adopted in California and Seattle, requires build-ing owners to disclose actual building performance toall potential and new tenants and buyers. This will

have a great impact on the market since prospective

tenants will be able to compare what their energy costswill be between buildings. This is a pretty smart way

to encourage building owners to retrot their buildingswithout mandating it, she says.

Companies are ranked according torevenue for contractors services gen-erated in 2011 from projects that havebeen registered with or certied by athird-party organization that sets stan-dards for measuring a buildings or facilitysenvironmental impact, energy efciency orcarbon footprint. Such groups include theU.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) andthe Green Building Initiative. The volume ofrevenue is measured in ($) millions. Somemarkets may not add up to 100% due to

rounding. Revenue from construction

management on a fee-only basis is notincluded.

Accredited StaffThis is the number ofpeople employed by the contractors whohave been certied as knowledgeable ingreen construction by third-partyaccreditation organizations, includinggroups such as USGBC and Green

Advantage.

% of Total RevenueThis percentageshows a rm's total contracting revenuederived from green contracting, based on

its responses to the Top 400 Contractorssurvey and Top Green Contractors survey.NA=Did not submit a Top 400 survey.

Educationcomprises public and privateeducational facilities, including both K-12and higher education.

Entertainment/Civic includes sportsfacilities, entertainment facilities, casinos,theme parks, and religious and culturalfacilities.

Government Ofce includes federal,state and local government ofce facilities.

Health Care includes hospitals, clinics,medical assistance facilities, nursinghomes and assisted-living centers.

Hotel includes hotels, motels, resorts andconvention centers.

Multi-Residentialincludes co-ops,condominiums and apartment buildings.

Retail/Ofce includes commercialofces and retail facilities.

Other Buildingscomprises miscella-neous buildings.

Other Markets comprises industrialprocess and pharmaceutical plants, foodprocessing plants, manufacturing facilities,telecommunications facilities, infrastruc-ture and cabling, towers and antennae,data centers and web hotels, etc.

How To Read the Tables

#04BALFOUR BEATTY US completed inApr il t he LEED-Pla tin um WoundedWarrior headquarters at Marine CorpsBase Camp Pendleton in California.


For expandedcontent on theENR Top Lists,see enr.com/toplists.


5/6

RET

AIL

/C

OMML.

OFFICE

OTHER

BUILDIN

GS

MULTI-RESIDENTIAL

GOVERNMEN

TO

FFICE

EDUCATION

HEALTHCARE

HOTEL

SPORTS

/E

NT.

/CIVIC

OTHER

MKTS

.

IN$ MIL.

% OF TOTALREVENUE

ACC.STAFF

2011 GREEN REVENUE

1 1 THETURNERCORP., New York, N.Y. 1345 4,540.3 57 17 5 24 23 3 2 8 8 10

2 3 CLARKGROUP,Bethesda, Md. 349 2,423.9 57 9 33 5 29 8 8 0 4 4

3 2 GILBANEBUILDINGCO.,Providence, R.I. 494 2,353.3 76 6 3 39 35 0 0 0 11 5

4 10 BALFOURBEATTYUS,Dallas, Texas 420 2,137.9 52 10 18 21 10 8 2 1 9 22

5 7 THEWHITING-TURNERCONTRACTINGCO.,Baltimore, Md. 237 1,911.4 49 12 19 29 12 2 11 5 1 9

6 6 PCLCONSTRUCTIONENTERPRISESINC.,Denver, Colo. 348 1,730.3 31 4 17 10 35 7 0 13 10 4

7 8 SKANSKAUSA,New York, N.Y. 455 1,625.8 31 13 14 24 17 0 0 2 0 30

8 4 HENSELPHELPSCONSTRUCTIONCO.,Greeley, Colo. 325 1,476.9 66 0 36 10 15 4 4 4 20 7

9 9 HOLDERCONSTRUCTIONCO.,Atla nta, Ga. 165 1,060.7 60 26 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 68

10 83 BARTONMALOWCO.,Southfield, Mich. 119 1,001.6 74 0 0 31 55 0 0 3 0 12

11 19 DPRCONSTRUCTION,Redwood City, Calif. 399 946.2 47 14 0 5 30 0 0 0 0 50

12 12 MORTENSONCONSTRUCTION,Minneapolis, Minn. 278 848.1 34 26 0 4 10 0 0 21 17 21

13 28 STRUCTURETONE,New York, N.Y. 165 785.6 32 47 4 32 0 0 0 8 0 10

14 16 MANHATTANCONSTRUCTIONGROUP, Tulsa, Okla. 81 779.2 58 1 67 12 5 0 1 13 1 0

15 15 WEBCORBUILDERS,San Francisco, Calif. 122 767.8 96 13 15 5 21 4 6 8 0 28

16 26 JEDUNNCONSTRUCTIONGROUP,Kansas City, Mo. 389 760.3 40 2 48 22 15 0 0 1 4 8

17 13 THEWALSHGROUPLTD.,Chicago, Ill. 225 711.7 20 2 27 3 5 0 25 0 32 6

18 18 MCCARTHYHOLDINGSINC.,St. Louis, Mo. 407 697.0 29 0 0 21 60 0 0 4 5 10

19 27 SWINERTONINC.,San Francisco, Calif. 288 661.9 61 0 0 41 27 7 23 3 0 0

20 11 HUNTCONSTRUCTIONGROUP,Scottsdale, Ariz. 245 654.0 37 0 1 13 17 2 0 56 10 0

21 17 CLAYCOINC.,St. Louis, Mo. 75 599.0 73 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0

22 31 AUSTININDUSTRIES,Dallas, Texas 48 568.7 37 6 0 25 13 1 14 0 0 40

23 21 BRASFIELD&GORRIELLC,Birmingham, Ala. 233 558.9 34 11 3 8 62 9 3 0 2 1

24 35 JAMESG.DAVISCONSTRUCTIONCORP.,Rockville, Md. 75 539.5 89 45 39 0 0 0 4 2 0 10

2552

LECHASECONSTRUCTIONSERVICESLLC,Rocheste r, N.Y. 40

512.4 7013 5 35 15 0 8 0 0 24

26 5 TUTORPERINICORP.,Sylmar, Calif. 199 511.5 12 26 28 22 4 2 3 12 2 2

27 20 B.L.HARBERTINTERNATIONALLLC,Birmingham, Ala. 35 507.6 82 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

28 22 SUFFOLKCONSTRUCTIONCO.INC.,Boston, Mass. 201 503.0 39 8 30 26 31 0 1 0 2 0

29 40 KIEWITCORP.,Omaha, Neb. 204 472.9 6 19 10 2 2 0 0 11 4 51

30 23 SUNDTCONSTRUCTIONINC.,Tempe, Ariz. 154 460.1 52 4 11 56 18 0 7 0 0 5

31 30 DAVIDE.HARVEYBUILDERSINC.,Houston, Texas 32 455.0 63 87 6 4 3 0 0 0 0 0

32 39 KBR,Houston, Texas 128 449.8 6 0 0 18 62 0 15 0 0 5

33 48 PEPPERCONSTRUCTIONGROUP,Chicago, Ill. 185 416.7 35 9 13 21 18 0 0 31 8 0

34 34 POWERCONSTRUCTIONCO.LLC,Schaumburg, Ill. 95 381.0 57 21 0 37 40 0 0 0 2 0

35 29 CADDELLCONSTRUCTIONCO.INC.,Montgomery, Ala. 16 375.9 89 3 63 0 0 0 17 0 16 0

36 33 HITTCONTRACTINGINC.,Falls Church, Va. 71 365.5 38 32 46 1 4 3 13 0 2 0

37 57 CONSIGLICONSTRUCTIONCO.INC.,Milford, Mass. 73 347.6 55 10 9 66 5 0 0 3 6 0

38 24 DUKECONSTRUCTION,Indianapolis, Ind. 31 345.9 49 2 71 0 14 0 0 0 13 0

39 ** FLINTCOLLC,Tulsa, Okla. 122 318.7 31 46 0 30 18 0 1 6 0 0

40 64 GRAYCONSTRUCTION,Lexington, Ky. 23 318.6 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 96

41 60 C.W.DRIVER,Pasadena, Calif. 52 317.3 79 6 10 64 0 0 2 18 0 0

42 70 BIG-DCONSTRUCTIONCORP.,Salt Lake City, Utah 53 303.9 55 4 8 15 2 0 0 11 34 27

43 42 JACOBSENCONSTRUCTIONCO.INC.,Salt Lake City, Utah 43 283.2 72 42 8 30 4 0 7 0 11 0

44 46 OKLANDCONSTRUCTIONCO.INC.,Salt Lake City, Utah 53 275.6 48 20 19 18 19 8 8 0 3 6

45 49 KRAUS-ANDERSONCONSTRUCTIONCO.,Minneapolis, Minn. 39 263.6 53 15 5 38 20 0 0 0 21 0

46 45 BERNARDS,San Fernando, Calif. 44 262.1 51 2 12 40 0 0 12 34 0 0

47 79 DEVCONCONSTRUCTIONINC.,Milpitas, Calif. 27 260.0 58 38 0 10 0 0 5 0 47 0

48 47 FORRESTERCONSTRUCTIONCO.,Rockville, Md. 65 256.0 68 40 29 30 0 0 0 0 0 0

49 54 DIMEOCONSTRUCTIONCO.,Providence, R.I. 21 255.7 85 17 2 66 0 0 14 0 0 0

50 ** W.M.JORDANCO.,Newport News, Va. 12 254.7 67 0 3 66 14 1 4 3 9 0

RANK

2012 2011

THE TOP 100 GREEN CONTRACTORS OVERVIEWThe Top 100 List

enr.com September17,2012 ENR 5


6/6

RET

AIL

/C

OMML.

OFFICE

OTHER

BUILDIN

GS

MULTI-RESIDENTIAL

GOVERNMEN

TO

FFICE

EDUCATION

HEALTH

CARE

HOTEL

SPORTS

/E

NT.

/CIVIC

OTHER

MKTS

.

IN$ MIL.

% OF TOTALREVENUE

ACC.STAFF

2011 GREEN REVENUE

51 59 MCGOUGHCONSTRUCTION,St. Paul, Minn. 20 250.0 52 48 0 8 44 0 0 0 0 0

52 73 WALBRIDGE,Detroit, Mich. 65 249.6 22 10 0 12 0 0 5 0 7 65

53 36 THEYATESCOS.INC.,Philadelphia, Miss. 96 249.1 22 1 15 31 8 0 21 0 24 0

54 25 SELLENCONSTRUCTIONCO.INC.,Seattle, Wash. 34 223.0 52 22 21 9 34 0 0 13 0 0

55 69 ONEILINDUSTRIESINC.,Chicago, Ill. 67 212.6 46 0 1 11 48 5 4 15 0 16

56 53 THEKORTECO.,Highland, Ill. 12 200.2 83 5 0 0 19 0 47 0 29 0

57 74 SATTERFIELD&PONTIKESCONSTRUCTIONINC.,Houston, Texas 30 197.0 47 0 30 50 1 0 18 0 1 0

58 71 MESSERCONSTRUCTIONCO.,Cincinnati, Ohio 72 191.3 34 12 19 61 2 0 0 0 0 7

59 43 OHLUSAINC.,Miami, Fla. 15 189.9 23 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 77 0

60 63 GRUNLEYCONSTRUCTIONCO.INC.,Rockville, Md. 26 186.0 56 0 91 0 0 0 0 7 1 0

61 37 HARPERCONSTRUCTIONCO.INC.,San Diego, Calif. 9 184.2 95 0 12 5 0 0 83 0 0 0

62 75 SAUNDERSCONSTRUCTIONINC.,Centennial, Colo. 54 182.4 56 28 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 15

63 ** THEWALSHGROUP, Portland, Ore. 41 174.0 65 9 0 3 0 0 88 0 0 0

64 76 CORECONSTRUCTIONGROUP,Phoenix, Ariz. 40 172.4 26 0 14 29 3 0 40 13 0 1

65 ** ADOLFSON&PETERSONCONSTRUCTION,Minneapolis, Minn. 122 171.4 24 0 22 42 15 0 16 5 0 0

66 ** NABHOLZCONSTRUCTIONCORP.,Conway, Ark. 57 166.0 32 34 0 52 13 0 0 0 0 0

67 50 THEWEITZCO.,Des Moines, Iowa 132 164.0 18 40 41 8 0 0 5 4 1 0

68 85 ANDERSENCONSTRUCTION,Portland, Ore. 28 160.0 57 0 0 31 69 0 0 0 0 0

69 93 HARKINSBUILDERSINC.,Marriottsville, Md. NA 160.0 80 0 33 0 19 0 44 0 0 4

70 67 TBPENICK&SONSINC.,San Diego, Calif. 9 159.0 86 0 0 12 1 0 0 10 60 17

71 51 SHIELSEXTONCO.INC.,Indianapolis, Ind. 26 152.0 55 4 20 64 4 0 0 0 8 0

72 88 F.A.WILHELMCONSTRUCTIONCO.INC.,Indianapolis, Ind. 6 152.0 32 25 0 8 43 0 0 20 0 5

73 44 HASKELL,Jacksonville, Fla. 111 149.1 25 0 57 7 2 0 0 0 0 34

74 ** NIBBIBROTHERSGENERALCONTRACTORS,San Francisco, Calif. 24 148.7 80 0 0 56 3 0 41 0 0 0

75**

PJDICK-TRUMBULL-LINDYPAVING,Pittsburgh, Pa. 11

147.5 2419 5 5 66 0 0 6 0 0

76 98 RYANCOS.USINC.,Minneapolis, Minn. 137 143.2 22 8 88 1 0 1 0 0 0 2

77 100 HOARCONSTRUCTIONLLC,Birmingham, Ala. 76 140.8 28 1 1 0 98 0 0 0 0 0

78 90 RODGERSBUILDERSINC.,Charlotte, N.C. 50 132.1 42 30 0 45 0 0 0 25 0 0

79 68 HARDINCONSTRUCTIONCO.LLC,Atla nta, Ga. 35 123.2 26 0 19 7 0 58 14 0 0 3

80 ** SAUERINC.,Jacksonville, Fla. 23 117.8 47 0 75 13 0 0 9 2 0 0

81 65 LEASECRUTCHERLEWIS,Seattle, Wash. 8 116.2 53 3 7 41 4 0 36 0 0 8

82 96 FORTISCONSTRUCTIONINC.,Portland, Ore. 23 110.0 48 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 55

83 56 BNBUILDERSINC.,Seattle, Wash. 57 99.0 41 32 4 8 13 0 0 0 43 0

84 41 HOFFMANCORP.,Portland, Ore. 129 94.6 5 5 24 10 1 0 35 9 0 15

85 ** LPCIMINELLIINC.,Buffalo, N.Y. 14 91.5 24 0 0 71 4 0 0 0 25 0

86 86 MASCAROCONSTRUCTIONCO.LP,Pittsburgh, Pa. 27 90.8 41 5 27 64 1 0 0 3 1 0

87 ** E.W.HOWELLCO.LLC,Plainvie w, N.Y. 3 87.4 32 0 55 7 0 0 0 38 0 0

88 ** THEPIKECO.INC.,Rocheste r, N.Y. 30 87.0 35 0 9 41 28 3 0 17 1 0

89 84 S.M.WILSON&CO.,St. Louis, Mo. 9 82.9 32 15 9 44 1 0 0 30 0 0

90 ** GEJOHNSONCONSTRUCTIONCO.,Colorado Springs, Colo. 48 82.6 37 0 19 65 0 0 0 17 0 0

91 ** CHOATECONSTRUCTIONCO.,Atla nta, Ga. 80 82.3 17 24 4 18 6 0 1 0 46 0

92 80 CLANCY&THEYSCONSTRUCTIONCO.,Raleigh, N.C. 33 80.3 32 28 3 21 0 0 2 47 0 0

93 ** URSCORP.,San Francisco, Calif. 645 78.8 3 0 0 0 41 0 2 0 56 0

94 ** COLUMBIACONSTRUCTIONCO.,North Reading, Mass. 10 75.0 50 33 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

95 ** AJAXBUILDINGCORP.,Midway, Fla. 24 70.3 62 0 5 95 0 0 0 0 0 0

96 ** BONDBROTHERS,Everett, Mass. 17 70.0 36 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0

97 ** WOHLSENCONSTRUCTIONCO.,Lancaster, Pa. 58 70.0 36 16 5 17 8 0 0 0 54 0

98 66 THEBECKGROUP,Dallas, Texas 182 66.8 15 0 14 84 3 0 0 0 0 0

99 ** TARLTONCORP.,St. Louis, Mo. 17 64.9 46 0 27 0 48 0 0 25 0 0

100 95 MIRONCONSTRUCTIONCO.INC.,Neenah, Wis. 53 64.6 13 5 22 47 0 0 0 21 5 0

RANK

2012 2011

THE TOP 100 GREEN CONTRACTORS OVERVIEW#01THETURNERCORP. topped theGreen Contractors list for the fthstraight year. It also had the mostLEED-accredited employees.

enr.com September17,2012 ENR 6

list of green concept contractors worldwide

Documents