lmoga offshore issues update · 2018-03-07 · 1 lmoga offshore issues update lars herbst, p.e....

42
1 LMOGA OFFSHORE ISSUES UPDATE Lars Herbst, P.E. BSEE Gulf of Mexico Regional Director 28 February 2018 “To promote safety, protect the environment and conserve resources offshore through vigorous regulatory oversight and enforcement.” 1

Upload: others

Post on 27-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1

    LMOGA OFFSHORE ISSUES

    UPDATE

    Lars Herbst, P.E. BSEE Gulf of Mexico Regional Director 28 February 2018

    “To promote safety, protect the environment and conserve resources offshore through vigorous regulatory

    oversight and enforcement.” 1

  • 2

    BSEE Updates

    • Regulatory Reform • GOM Activity • High Pressure High Temperature

    Permitting • Risk-based inspections • Decommissioning planning • Other Priorities in 2018

    2

  • EXECUTIVE ORDER IMPLEMENTING AN AMERICA-FIRST OFFSHORE ENERGY STRATEGY—

    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, 43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq., and in order to maintain global leadership in energy innovation, exploration, and production, it is hereby ordered as follows: …….

    Sec. 2. Policy. It shall be the policy of the United States to encourage energy exploration and production, including on the Outer Continental Shelf, in order to maintain the Nation's position as a global energy leader and foster energy security and resilience for the benefit of the American people, while ensuring that any such activity is safe and environmentally responsible.

    3

  • IMPLEMENTING AN AMERICA-FIRST OFFSHORE ENERGY STRATEGY— Sec. 7. Reconsideration of Well Control Rule. The Secretary of the Interior shall review the Final Rule of the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) entitled "Oil and Gas and Sulfur Operations in the Outer Continental Shelf-Blowout Preventer Systems and Well Control," 81 Fed. Reg. 25888 (April 29, 2016), for consistency with the policy set forth in section 2 of this order, and shall publish for notice and comment a proposed rule revising that rule, if appropriate and as consistent with law. The Secretary of the Interior shall also take all appropriate action to lawfully revise any related rules and guidance for consistency with the policy set forth in section 2 of this order. Additionally, the Secretary of the Interior shall review BSEE's regulatory regime for offshore operators to determine the extent to which additional regulation is necessary.

    4

  • EXECUTIVE ORDER

    Presidential Executive Order Implementing an America-First Offshore Energy Strategy EXECUTIVE ORDER - - - - - - - DONALD J. TRUMP THE WHITE HOUSE, April 28, 2017.

    5

  • Order 3349 – American Energy Independence Supports Executive Order signed March 28, 2017 Directs DOI to review all existing regulations, orders, guidance documents and policies that potentially burden development

    Order 3350 – America-First Offshore Energy Strategy

    Implements Executive Order signed April 28, 2017 Directs BSEE to reevaluate the “Well Control Rule”

    Order 3351 – Strengthening the DOI Energy Portfolio

    Directs BSEE to identify regulatory burdens that unnecessarily encumber energy exploration, development, production transportation; and develop strategies to eliminate or minimize the burdens.

    Secretary’s Orders on Energy Free industry to discover and produce

    6

  • 7

    Well Control Rule Review

    7

  • Review of Deepwater Horizon recommendations(300+) Public Forum – May 2012 Completion of industry standards – November 2012 Publication of proposed regulations – April 2015 Final rule published – April 28, 2016 Implementation over several years

    Development Process for

    Current WCR

    8

  • BSEE utilized the following sources of information in reviewing its regulations for potential revision:

    • Reviewed BSEE internal policies • Implementation of the original WCR • BSEE webpage Q and As • Review of permitting process • BSEE WCR public forum (September 20, 2017) • Comments submitted to BSEE

    BSEE Regulatory Review

    9

  • Well Control Rule Public Forum Sept. 20, 2017, 1919 Smith Street, Houston, Texas

    Goal: To ensure a complete and thorough review of the Well Control Rule with stakeholder input. Are there potential revisions to the rule that would significantly reduce regulatory burdens without significantly reducing safety and environmental protection on the OCS? • BSEE accepted both written and oral presentations

    from interested parties at the forum • Two sessions were held

    10

  • Major issues raised during the WCR implementation and BSEE public forum:

    • Safe drilling margin • Real-time monitoring • Accumulator systems • BSEE Approved Verification Organizations(BAVOs) • Casing and cementing

    General Issues

    11

  • Concerns raised with WCR requirements:

    • Not able to get pre-approval of margin at well planning stages. Concerns about getting consistent approval in APD

    • If no offset well data, concerns about getting

    approval for lower margin • Concerns about having to stop and remedy losses

    while drilling situation – use API bulletin 92L

    Major issues raised during the WCR implementation and BSEE public forum

    Safe drilling margin

    12

  • Concerns raised with WCR requirements:

    • The potential for an increase in rig personnel response time and a decrease in the accountability of the offshore personnel

    • Concerns about the meaning of proposed requirements to “immediately transmit” these RTM data and to maintain “continuous contact” between onshore personnel and rig personnel

    • Requires RTM centers

    Major issues raised during the WCR implementation and BSEE public forum

    Real-time Monitoring (RTM)

    13

  • Concerns raised with WCR requirements:

    • The increased number and weight of accumulator bottles could cause structural concerns for the BOP frame and the rig (especially for additional dedicated subsea bottles for deadman/autoshear functions)

    • Costs associated with the additional bottles would be

    significant • Additional system modifications such as open function for

    ROV provides additional points for potential leaks

    Major issues raised during the WCR implementation and BSEE public forum

    Accumulator systems

    14

  • Concerns raised with WCR requirements:

    • Redundant with current independent 3rd parties • Increased compliance costs to use a BAVO • Oversight of BAVO operations • Unsure of what to expect

    Major issues raised during the WCR implementation and BSEE public forum

    BAVOs

    15

  • Concerns raised with WCR requirements:

    • Concerns about the use of centralizers and should just reference API standard 65-2

    • Concerns about indications of an inadequate cement job and taking appropriate actions to determine adequacy.

    • Concerns about applying API spec 11D1 to all packers or

    bridge plugs

    Major issues raised during the WCR implementation and BSEE public forum

    Casing and Cementing

    16

  • Production Safety Systems Rule

    17

  • • Media reports have confused the Production Safety System Rule (PSSR) with other oil and gas regulations

    • The PSSR was not updated due the Deepwater Horizon incident, requirements updated due to that event are outside of the scope of the PSSR

    • The opening of new federal leases in the Atlantic, Pacific, and Alaskan waters are not within the scope of the PSSR

    Subpart H – Scope Clarification

    18

  • • Industry needed more time to comply with certain regulations contained within the 2016 update to Subpart H

    • Departures were given to certain regulations to allow production operations to continue in the Gulf of Mexico

    Subpart H – Departures

    19

  • • 5 current regulations have active departures • 250.842 – PE Stamping of Drawings • 250.872(a) – Chemical tanks with Class 1 liquids

    must comply with API 14C • 250.872(b) – Level Safety High (LSH) must be

    installed to sense the level in the oil bucket • 250.880(c)(2)(i) – PSVs must be tested annually.

    The piston must lift during this test • 250.880(c)(3)(iii) – Flame arrestors must be visually

    inspected annually

    Subpart H – Departures Granted

    20

  • Subpart H – Departures Granted

    21

    Chart1

    250.842 Drawings

    250.872(a) Chemical Tanks

    250.872(b) LSH in Oil Bucket

    880(c)(2)(i) PSVs

    880(c)(3)(iii) Flame Arrestors

    Series 1

    Number of Operators with a departure

    14

    4

    6

    14

    12

    Sheet1

    Series 1

    250.842 Drawings14

    250.872(a) Chemical Tanks4

    250.872(b) LSH in Oil Bucket6

    880(c)(2)(i) PSVs14

    880(c)(3)(iii) Flame Arrestors12

    To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

  • Subpart H – Departures Granted

    22

    Chart1

    250.842 Drawings

    250.872(a) Chemical Tanks

    250.872(b) LSH in Oil Bucket

    880(c)(2)(i) PSVs

    880(c)(3)(iii) Flame Arrestors

    Series 1

    Number of Platforms with a departure

    919

    283

    133

    643

    551

    Sheet1

    Series 1

    250.842 Drawings919

    250.872(a) Chemical Tanks283

    250.872(b) LSH in Oil Bucket133

    880(c)(2)(i) PSVs643

    880(c)(3)(iii) Flame Arrestors551

    To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

  • • Currently 2 of the 5 regulations that departures have been granted for have proposed changes • 250.842 is proposed to be changed to reduce the

    amount of drawings that require a PE stamp • 250.872(b) is proposed to grandfather in existing

    vessels • The other 3 regulations were only a problem

    because operators needed appropriate time to comply

    Subpart H – Departures

    23

    Proposed changes to regulations with departures

  • Gulf of Mexico Activity

    24

  • 25

    Drilling Rigs in US Gulf of Mexico

    Platform Rig = 12

    Semi-submersible = 5

    Drillship = 19

    Jack-up rig = 7

    25

  • 26

    Production Facilities

    Shallow Water Production Facilities

    (less than 500 ft)

    1951 Fixed

    Single Caisson 4 Pile

    Caisson

    Deepwater Production Facilities (greater than 500 ft)

    76 SPAR

    TLP FPSO

    Fixed

    26

  • 27

    Projects with Final Investment Decisions (FID)

    Deepwater GOM Operator Area Type Water First Gas

    Capacity Oil

    Capacity

    New Projects Block Depth (ft.) Prod. (MMscfpd) (Mbopd)

    Big Foot Chevron WR029 TLP 5,200 2018 25.0 75.0 Stampede Hess GC468 TLP 3,500 2018 60.0 80.0 Appomattox Shell MC392 Semi 7,200 2020 100.0 150.0 Mad Dog Phase 2 BP GC825 Semi 5,000 2021 25.0 110.0

    Subsea Tiebacks 2018 – 6, 2019 - 12 300 240 Potential Activity

    Potential Floating Platforms 4-9 yrs out 400 500 Subsea Tiebacks to existing platforms 2-5 yrs out 480 400

    Timeline from Lease Date to First Production: Lease date to Initial Discovery Date – 5 year average Discovery date to Final Investment Decision – 5 year average FID to First Production (construction & installation) – 3 year average * For larger and more complex projects, the timeline can be longer

    27

  • 28

    28

  • 29

    29

  • 30

    30

    Chart1

    19561956

    19571957

    19581958

    19591959

    19601960

    19611961

    19621962

    19631963

    19641964

    19651965

    19661966

    19671967

    19681968

    19691969

    19701970

    19711971

    19721972

    19731973

    19741974

    19751975

    19761976

    19771977

    19781978

    19791979

    19801980

    19811981

    19821982

    19831983

    19841984

    19851985

    19861986

    19871987

    19881988

    19891989

    19901990

    19911991

    19921992

    19931993

    19941994

    19951995

    19961996

    19971997

    19981998

    19991999

    20002000

    20012001

    20022002

    20032003

    20042004

    20052005

    20062006

    20072007

    20082008

    20092009

    20102010

    20112011

    20122012

    20132013

    20142014

    20152015

    20162016

    Installations

    Removals

    Federal OCS Production FacilitiesInstallations and Removals, 1956-2016

    42

    0

    51

    0

    83

    0

    85

    0

    111

    0

    109

    0

    127

    0

    91

    0

    130

    0

    131

    0

    118

    0

    133

    0

    113

    0

    117

    0

    119

    0

    101

    0

    145

    0

    97

    1

    59

    6

    103

    36

    116

    29

    113

    18

    171

    26

    173

    34

    174

    36

    168

    24

    197

    15

    174

    38

    225

    54

    214

    55

    111

    34

    117

    23

    167

    100

    197

    94

    175

    108

    155

    117

    88

    105

    122

    172

    176

    124

    131

    118

    152

    120

    146

    178

    148

    76

    104

    143

    150

    142

    161

    109

    100

    122

    119

    169

    128

    194

    110

    123

    119

    116

    93

    160

    78

    154

    33

    235

    29

    218

    19

    295

    10

    286

    17

    223

    21

    203

    4

    128

    2

    196

    Sheet1

    YEARInstallationsRemovals

    1956420

    1957510

    1958830

    1959850

    19601110

    19611090

    19621270

    1963910

    19641300

    19651310

    19661180

    19671330

    19681130

    19691170

    19701190

    19711010

    19721450

    1973971

    1974596

    197510336

    197611629

    197711318

    197817126

    197917334

    198017436

    198116824

    198219715

    198317438

    198422554

    198521455

    198611134

    198711723

    1988167100

    198919794

    1990175108

    1991155117

    199288105

    1993122172

    1994176124

    1995131118

    1996152120

    1997146178

    199814876

    1999104143

    2000150142

    2001161109

    2002100122

    2003119169

    2004128194

    2005110123

    2006119116

    200793160

    200878154

    200933235

    201029218

    201119295

    201210286

    201317223

    201421203

    20154128

    20162196

    Sheet1

    Installations

    Removals

    Federal OCS Production FacilitiesInstallations and Removals, 1956-2016

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • 31

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    160019

    5719

    5819

    5919

    6019

    6119

    6219

    6319

    6419

    6519

    6619

    6719

    6819

    6919

    7019

    7119

    7219

    7319

    7419

    7519

    7619

    7719

    7819

    7919

    8019

    8119

    8219

    8319

    8419

    8519

    8619

    8719

    8819

    8919

    9019

    9119

    9219

    9319

    9419

    9519

    9619

    9719

    9819

    9920

    0020

    0120

    0220

    0320

    0420

    0520

    0620

    0720

    0820

    0920

    1020

    1120

    1220

    1320

    1420

    1520

    16

    Gulf of Mexico OCS Region Total Well Drilled and PA'd & TA'd by Year

    Wells Drilled

    Wells PA'd & TA'd

    31

  • 32

    Risk Based Inspections

    32

  • Risk Based Inspections

    Facility Based Risk

    Inspections- Based on analysis

    of low probability, high consequence areas of a

    specific facility

    Performance Based Risk Inspections-

    Based on Analysis of Key Performance Indicators and utilizing Trend Analysis to focus on reducing likelihood of events and compliance issues Gulf

    wide

    Annual Production Facility Inspections and Monthly Well Operation Inspections-

    Based on OCS mandate for inspections, Regional policy. Includes Follow-up on specific facility based on Increased

    Oversight Identification 33

  • Performance Based Risk Inspection Gas Releases

    34

  • Gas Release PBRI – Findings

    Seventeen (17) percent of the facilities involved in the PBRI had documented oil or gas accumulation. Eight (8) of the thirty six (36) PBRI facilities, or 22-percent, had a non-operable gas detector, no process implemented for calibrating devices, failed a bump test, or had no documentation on the frequency / results of inspections. The facilities associated with the Gas Release PBRI had no issues identified by BSEE staff on excessive temperatures. In fact, most observations made by inspectors indicated high temperature areas were well insulated and out of human reach.

    35

  • 36

    High Pressure High Temperature

    (HPHT) Prospects

    or The Next Frontier

    36

  • 37

    BSEE believes that the deployment of high pressure and high temperature (HPHT) equipment is a high risk activity with high consequences for failure. These activities require a higher level of scrutiny to insure that BSEE accomplishes their primary responsibility of protecting people and the environment and to conserve resources on the Outer Continental Shelf.

    HPHT Projects

    37

  • 38

    • 30 CFR 250.807 - Additional requirements for subsurface safety valves and related equipment installed in high pressure high temperature (HPHT) environments

    • (a)(1) Design Verification Analysis

    • (a)(2) Design Validation Testing

    • (b) HPHT is greater than 15,000 psi or 350°F

    Code of Federal Regulations for HPHT Projects

    38

  • 39

    Decommissioning Planning

    Rigs to Reefs Program o FY17 - 27 permits approved that proposed converting decommissioned

    structures into artificial reefs; 16 have been reefed o Fieldwood – 9 o W&T - 5

    o Last 5 years-128 platforms have been approved for the program in the

    Gulf of Mexico

    39

  • 40

    Decommissioning Planning

    Areas of Concern o Backlog of facilities and wells that need to be removed on expired

    and active leases(idle iron) still needs to be addressed. o Bankruptcies have caused some decommissioning liabilities

    [facilities and wells] to become uncovered (no financial assurance in place and/or no co lessee or prior lessee).

    40

  • 41

    Other BSEE 2018 Focus Areas

    • Well intervention • Subsea leak detection • Royalty policy • Support to BOEM leasing draft proposed

    program

    41

  • BSEE Website: www.bsee.gov

    @ BSEEgov BSEEgov

    Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement

    BSEEgov

    https://www.facebook.com/BSEEgov/ “To promote safety, protect the environment and

    conserve resources offshore through vigorous regulatory oversight and enforcement.”

    42

    http://www.bsee.gov/http://www.facebook.com/

    LMOGA�OFFSHORE ISSUES�UPDATEBSEE UpdatesSlide Number 3Slide Number 4 EXECUTIVE ORDERSecretary’s Orders on EnergyWell Control Rule ReviewDevelopment Process �for �Current WCR BSEE Regulatory ReviewWell Control Rule Public Forum General Issues Major issues raised during the WCR � implementation and BSEE public forum Major issues raised during the WCR � implementation and BSEE public forum Major issues raised during the WCR � implementation and BSEE public forum Major issues raised during the WCR� implementation and BSEE public forum Major issues raised during the WCR � implementation and BSEE public forumProduction Safety Systems RuleSubpart H – Scope ClarificationSubpart H – Departures Subpart H – Departures GrantedSubpart H – Departures GrantedSubpart H – Departures GrantedSubpart H – DeparturesSlide Number 24Drilling Rigs in US Gulf of MexicoProduction FacilitiesSlide Number 27Slide Number 28Slide Number 29Slide Number 30Slide Number 31Risk Based InspectionsRisk Based InspectionsPerformance Based Risk Inspection Gas Release PBRI – FindingsHigh Pressure �High Temperature�(HPHT)�Prospects�or �The Next FrontierHPHT ProjectsCode of Federal Regulations �for HPHT ProjectsDecommissioning PlanningDecommissioning PlanningOther BSEE 2018 Focus AreasBSEE Website: www.bsee.gov