Locality D - Mosborough - Handsworth - CSA Profile 2017 This Locality comprises the following electoral wards which were created following a boundary review in 2017.

Beighton – Birley- Mosborough – Richmond – Woodhouse.

This map shows the distribution and types of childcare across Locality D

Population

0-17 years Population Levels of school age population are close to the city average in this locality

JSA Claimants. The level of JSA claimants is close to the city average. Prior to 2016 this was JSA claimants but now includes those claiming the JSA element of Universal Credit and is expected to rise as this is rolled out city wide in 2018.

Locality B 2YO 3YO 4YO not in Reception

Eligible 3&4 YO

Mosborough/Handsworth 277 913 302 1215

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

War

d P

op

ula

tio

n

Age

Mosborough/Handsworth Population 0 to 17s

Mosborough/Handsworth Ward Locality Average0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Cla

iman

ts

Year

Number of Universal Credit Claimants in Mosborough/Handsworth

Male - Ward

Female -Ward

Male -LocalityAverage

Female -LocalityAverage

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Sheffield

Mosborough/Handsworth

Ethicity Profile of Mosborough/Handsworth White

Mixed

Asian

Black

Other

Ethnicity

The BME population is very low in this area

at only 5%

FEL Population. This area has less than

average number of 2yr olds and is close to

average for 3&4yr olds eligible for FEL.

levels of eligible 3 & 4 year olds.

Looked After Children Pre-

School Age

FEL Age Accessing

FEL Primary

Age Secondary

Age Post-

Secondary

Mosborough/Handsworth 8 3 3 15 23 15

Total in Sheffield 53 19 19 92 116 75

Outside Sheffield 33 5 0 55 103 46

Total 86 24 19 147 219 121

Special Educational Needs & Disabled (SEND) Children

Mosborough/Handsworth No on Record Statemented Education Health and Care Plan SEN Support Total SEND

Count % Count % Count % Count TS %

Primary - Years 0-6 6566 70 1.1% 53 0.8% 992 15.1% 1115 17.0%

Sheffield 0-6yrs 44067 511 1.2% 287 0.7% 6665 15.1% 7463 16.9%

Secondary - Years 7-13 4235 100 2.4% 69 1.6% 489 11.5% 658 15.5%

Sheffield 7-13 yrs 30140 604 2.0% 439 1.5% 3667 12.2% 4710 15.6%

Locality Total 10801 170 1.6% 122 1.1% 1481 13.7% 1773 16.4%

Sheffield 74207 1115 1.5% 726 1.0% 10332 13.9% 12173 16.4%

FEL Take up Spring 2017 measured across the ward locality.

Age group

Eligible Population

Children

% Take-up of Eligible Population

2 year old FEL 338 274 81.1%

3 year old FEL 994 931 93.7%

4 year old FEL 341 330 96.8%

3 & 4 year old FEL 1335 1261 94.5%

Looked After Children.

There are 3Looked After Children who are eligible

for FEL and all have taken up a place.

There are average levels of SEND children in this locality with 17% aged 0-6 years compared to Sheffield at 16.9% and aged 7-13 years

at 15.5% it is close to the city average of 15.6%.

Take up was well above the city average of 66.47% for 2 year FEL

Take up was well above the city average of 89.88% for 3 year old FEL

Take up was just above the city average of 95.5% for 4 year old FEL

Take up was well above the city average of 90.73% for 3&4 year old

FEL

This is consistently one of the areas with the highest take up rates for all

ages.

30 Hour Offer

The table below shows the numbers

and the distribution of eligible children

in each of the wards which make up

Locality D.

Ward EFE Eligible children

Beighton 190 69%

Birley 159 65%

Mosborough 165 78%

Richmond 192 62%

Woodhouse 173 59%

Locality Total 879 66%

On average about 1/3rd of children

are eligible in Locality D but this rises

to over ¾ in the Mosborough ward.

Potential providers should not use

this information to influence where

they might set up a new provision

but should carry out their own

independent market research

before making that decision.

This map shows the distribution of children eligible for the 30 hour childcare offer from September

2017 in Locality D. Areas marked red have the highest concentration of eligible children living in them

however this does not necessarily imply a need for additional places as many of these children will

already be accessing additional childcare and will flip this for funded childcare.

Childcare

Quality

Type of Childcare Number of

Settings % Outstanding/Good (of

inspected Settings) Outstanding Good

Requires Improvement

Inadequate Awaiting First Inspection

Met None

Childminder 30 100% 2 25 0 0 0 3

Day Nursery 15 100% 1 13 0 0 0 1

Nursery School 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0

Playgroup 3 100% 0 3 0 0 0 0

Reception Class 6 67% 0 4 2 0 0 0

Nursery Class in School 15 87% 2 11 2 0 0 0

Special School 1 100% 1 0 0 0 0 0

Of 66 settings inspected to date none were rated as Inadequate by Ofsted.

FEL Places.

2 year FEL Places Population PTE Capacity Places per 100

Total 338 377 112

3 & 4 year FEL Places

Total 1335 1962 147

The Local Authority has a duty to secure sufficient places for

FEL children who wish to access a place.

Across this locality there are probably sufficient FEL places for

all ages.

The national target for 2 year old FEL is 80% take up and

there are 112 places for every 100 children but there may be

a need for some additional places in the Richmond area.

For 3 &4 year olds there are 147 places for every 100 children

with substantial surpluses in all areas.

FEL Providers This table provides a list of registered FEL providers in Locality D

Provider Sector Reg Type Ofsted Rating IDACI Decile

Ward

Becton School LA RNSP Outstanding 5 Beighton

Beighton Nursery Infant School LA RECNU Outstanding 10 Beighton

Bizzy Bees Family Childcare Centre PRV DN Good 10 Beighton

Elinor Halliday (CM) PRV CM Good 6 Beighton

Fairmount Nursery (Hackenthorpe) PRV DN Good 9 Beighton

Hackenthorpe Hall Nursery PRV DN Good 5 Beighton

Jill Carruthers (CM) PRV CM Good 7 Beighton

Joanne Wilson (CM) PRV CM Good 7 Beighton

Lana Crookes (CM) PRV CM None 4 Beighton

Lisa James (CM) PRV CM Outstanding 10 Beighton

Lyndsey Groves (CM) PRV CM Good 5 Beighton

Rainbow Forge Primary School LA RECNU Requires Improvement 5 Beighton

Reignhead Primary School LA RECNU Good 4 Beighton

Stephanie Groves (CM) PRV CM Good 8 Beighton

Amanda Jane Smith (CM) PRV CM Good 9 Birley

Amanda Lawford (CM) PRV CM Good 7 Birley

Birley Community Pre-School PRV DN None 6 Birley

Birley Primary School LA RECNU Good 6 Birley

Birley Spa Primary School LA RECNU Good 3 Birley

Carole Grayson (CM) PRV CM Good 9 Birley

Charnock Hall Primary School LA REC Requires Improvement 9 Birley

Chloe Parker (CM) PRV CM Good 9 Birley

Clare White (CM) PRV CM Good 8 Birley

Elmore Kindergarten - Frecheville PRV DN Good 9 Birley

Emma Charles (CM) PRV CM Good 9 Birley

Linda Lee (CM) PRV CM Good 7 Birley

Lisa Parker (CM) PRV CM Good 9 Birley

Marie Langley (CM) PRV CM Good 7 Birley

St. John Fisher Catholic Primary School LA REC Good 3 Birley

Sunflower Children's Centre PRV DN Good 9 Birley

Deborah Martin (CM) PRV CM None 10 Mosborough

Emmanuel Stepping Stones Playgroup VOL PG Good 7 Mosborough

Halfway Nursery Infant School LA RECNU Good 4 Mosborough

Helena Wright (CM) PRV CM Good 10 Mosborough

Just for Kidz PRV DN Good 6 Mosborough

Sector Key ACD = Academy LA = Local Authority PRV = Private VOL = Voluntary – (Usually non-profit making) Registration Type Key CM = Childminder DN = Day nursery REC = Reception class RECNU= Reception & Nursery class RNSP = Reception % Nursery class in Special School PG = Playgroup IDACI Decile is a measure of Income Deprivation Affecting Children Indicator and 1 is the most deprived and 10 the least area nationally. This is used to show the location of the provider

Karen Reaney (CM) PRV CM Good 10 Mosborough

Lamb Setts Montessori Nursery PRV DN Good 9 Mosborough

Mosborough Primary School LA REC Good 9 Mosborough

Oak Valley Day Nursery PRV DN Good 4 Mosborough

Shortbrook Primary School LA REC Good 1 Mosborough

Shortbrook Primary School Daycare LA DN Good 1 Mosborough

Susan Al-Horaibi (CM) PRV CM Good 1 Mosborough

Teresa Barker (CM) PRV CM Good 4 Mosborough

Waterthorpe Nursery Infant School LA RECNU Outstanding 7 Mosborough

Amanda Dale (CM) PRV CM Good 7 Richmond

Carol Steele (CM) PRV CM Good 9 Richmond

Gleadless Primary School LA RECNU Requires Improvement 5 Richmond

Helen Dyball (CM) PRV CM Outstanding 5 Richmond

Intake Pre School VOL DN Good 5 Richmond

Intake Primary School LA REC Good 5 Richmond

Louise Robinson (CM) PRV CM Good 4 Richmond

Mandy Beal (CM) PRV CM Good 2 Richmond

Stradbroke Primary School LA RECNU Requires Improvement 5 Richmond

Sunshine Pre-School VOL PG Good 1 Richmond

Trudie Gillett (CM) PRV CM Good 4 Richmond

Woodthorpe Community Primary School LA RECNU Good 1 Richmond

Athelstan Primary School LA REC Requires Improvement 2 Woodhouse

Ballifield Primary School LA RECNU Good 3 Woodhouse

Beverley Trueman (CM) PRV CM Good 6 Woodhouse

Brunswick Primary School LA RECNU Good 2 Woodhouse

Faith Webster (CM) PRV CM Good 6 Woodhouse

Handsworth Community Nursery VOL DN Good 2 Woodhouse

Highgate Day Nursery PRV DN Good 6 Woodhouse

Jill Middleton (CM) PRV CM None 8 Woodhouse

St. Joseph's Catholic Primary School ACD RECNU Good 6 Woodhouse

Sunny Meadows Nursery PRV DN Outstanding 3 Woodhouse

Twinkles Day Nursery PRV DN Good 4 Woodhouse

Woodhouse Community Playgroup VOL PG Good 2 Woodhouse

Woodhouse Nursery PRV DN Good 6 Woodhouse

Woodhouse West Primary School LA RECNU Good 3 Woodhouse

Teresa Barker (CM) PRV CM Good 4 Mosborough

Twinkles Day Nursery PRV DN Good 4 Woodhouse

Waterthorpe Nursery Infant School LA RECNU Outstanding 7 Mosborough

Woodhouse Community Playgroup VOL PG Good 2 Woodhouse