location matters webinar slides
DESCRIPTION
Until recently, resource assessment for wind energy projects has heavily relied on the standard approach employing meteorological towers to establish historical climate conditions. This webinar concentrates on how highly accurate modeled wind resource data can speed up preconstruction activities while significantly reducing development costs. Members of the AWS Truepower Information Services team discuss how virtual met masts (VMMs) and reports based on high-resolution data save time and money when it comes to understanding the resource and energy potential of your project site. They also share experiences from seasoned developers who have used AWS Truepower’s data to qualify project sites.TRANSCRIPT
ALBANY • BARCELONA • BANGALORE
463 NEW KARNER ROAD | ALBANY, NY 12205awstruepower.com | [email protected]
GIS-BASED SITE SCREENING, MAP-BASED ASSESSMENTS AND MET TOWER SITINGWITH WINDNAVIGATOR® PROJECT DESIGN GRIDS AND OPENWIND® ENTERPRISE
MATT BAKERMODELING GROUP MANAGER
BRYON PHELPSPRODUCT COORDINATOR
AMBER TRENDELLDIRECTOR OF SALES AND MARKETING
AUGUST 2010
LOCATION MATTERS
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Outline
• Site Screening with GIS Tools– Finding energetic sites and assessing competitive advantage
• Map-based Assessments– Case Study
• Siting Meteorological Towers– Using windNavigator® project design grids and openWind® Enterprise for
preliminary met tower siting
• Q&A
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Locating Profitable and Energetic Sites:High-Resolution Wind Maps and Data
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Locating Profitable and Energetic Wind Sites
High-Resolution Wind Maps and DataBasic GIS Analysis Examples• Ranking of counties by amount of land
area in a given wind class• Spatial selection of counties within
distance of proposed transmission• Installed capacity vs. capacity factor
Getting A Closer Look with Site-Specific Maps and Data
• Site-specific maps can provide an indication of a site’s wind variability
• ‘Virtual Met Masts’ provide a modeled annual time series dataset
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Locating Profitable and Energetic Sites:GIS-based Site Screening
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Locating Profitable and Energetic Wind Sites
Site Screening Application and Inputs:• Modeled wind speed directions/frequency distributions • Validated wind speed map• Major development obstacles• Existing and proposed transmission line locations based on capacity and
distance to sites• Additional optional inputs: cost of interconnection, cost per unit length of
transmission and road construction, bulk plant loss factors, turbine model and power curve, desired plant capacity
Result: Map and tabular ranking of best potential wind sites including: capacity factor, core and expanded area annual power output, annual average wind speed, road network lengths, etc.
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Locating Profitable and Energetic Wind Sites
Site Screening Application Results
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Tools for Getting the Most Out of Your Project Site
Public and private data is very useful in identifying potential obstacles to development, helping understand land acquisition and footprint needs, and aiding in the development of turbine layouts
Source DataUSGS (Seamless Data Server) 10m, 30m, 90m resolution elevation dataNational Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) Land cover (also for surface roughness)US Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)ESRI-served datasets Hydrography, landmarks, airports, etc.US Census Bureau TIGER line files Roads, Municipal BoundariesLocal Municipality Land Parcel (cadastral) BoundariesState Data Centers State-specific environmental areasFEMA/NFIP Floodplain mapsFAA / DoD Preliminary Screening Tool Web-based preliminary site assessmentVentyx, Platts Transmission Lines, Buried Pipeline, etc.
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Locating Profitable and Energetic Sites:Competitive Analysis
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Locating Profitable and Energetic Wind Sites
Existing and Proposed Wind Farm Locations for Competitive Analysis
• AWEA and FAA turbine inventory data can be employed to conduct competitive analysis, understand potential wake impacts on your proposed project, and identify untapped wind resource
Background map data source: Google EarthWind Farm location source: AWEA, Federal Aviation Administration, AWS Truepower
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Assessing the Energy Potential of Prospective Sites:Map-Based Energy Assessments
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Assessing Energy Potential with Modeled Data
Case Study: Map-Based Energy Assessments
What: A method of estimating a plant’s energy production using: public turbine location data, models, and hub heights for existing wind projects; wind maps and modeled historical wind data; and region-specific loss estimates. Data are combined in a standard wind farm design software program to produce an estimated energy yield.
Why: Time-constrained projects or portfolio acquisitions, need for an energy estimate in early stages of project development or need to understand energy production of a competitor’s project when on-site wind measurements are not yet available or not yet necessary.
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Assessing the Energy Potential of Prospective Sites with Maps
Case Study: Map-Based Energy Assessments
Method1. Develop Wind Resource Grid (WRG) for each project location using
modeled output derived from MesoMap®, a mesoscale-microscalemodeling system.
2. Calibrate the WRG to a fully-validated national 200 m horizontal-resolution mean annual wind speed map
3. Estimate site’s turbulence intensity and air density using modeled data4. Use energy modeling software and plant-specific power curves to
estimate turbine-by-turbine gross energy and wake losses, including wake losses from adjacent wind farms identified from wind farm inventory
5. Apply losses including: environmental, grid and turbine availability, electrical, and turbine performance losses (based on experience with other projects)
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Assessing the Energy Potential of Prospective Sites with Maps
Case Study: Map-Based Energy Assessments
Method Performance and Validation
• Method validated against operational plant production data from 41 wind farms spread across US, totaling 148 operational plant years
• Method validates well overall: Shows a slight underestimation of energy production across the entire sample set
• Some areas are predicted better than others
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Assessing the Energy Potential of Prospective Sites with Maps
Case Study: Map-Based Energy Assessments• Midwest, Upper and Lower Plains, Texas all predicted well. Method has
some higher biases in Northeast and West
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Assessing the Energy Potential of Prospective Sites with Maps
Case Study: Map-Based Energy Assessments• Midwest, Upper and Lower Plains, Texas all predicted well. Method has
some higher biases in Northeast and West
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Tips for Getting the Most from Your Project Site:The Science and Art of SitingMet Towers
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Met Tower Siting: Understanding Local Wind Patterns
Wind flow is nearly perpendicular to the ridgeline a large percentage of the time and slopes are steep on either side of the ridge
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Met Tower Siting: Understanding Local Wind Patterns
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
• openWind’s Modeling Uncertainty Module, along with a Project Design Grid (PDG), allow the user to identify areas of a project that would most benefit from additional met towers based on wind flow, terrain complexity and character of existing met towers.
• PDGs provide a validated snapshot of the wind resource including:• wind speed and power density
for each point on the map• frequency and weibull parameters for
each direction sector
Met Tower Siting with openWind® Enterprise and PDGs
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Met Tower Siting with openWind® Enterprise and PDGsProject area with seven existing masts
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Met Tower Siting with openWind® Enterprise and PDGsWind speeds highest along feature and to the east
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Met Tower Siting with openWind® Enterprise and PDGsopenWind can help suggest new mast locations based on existing coverage
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Met Tower Siting with openWind® Enterprise and PDGsopenWind can help suggest new mast locations based on existing coverage
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Met Tower Siting with openWind® Enterprise and PDGsCertain masts are most representative of certain areas of the map
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Met Tower Siting with openWind® Enterprise and PDGsThe mast that is most representative of any given spot can be a surprise
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Met Tower Siting with openWind® Enterprise and PDGsopenWind chooses a new mast location in the area of highest uncertainty
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
AWS Truepower Solutions:Which solution is right for you?
©2010 AWS Truepower, LLC
Goal Challenge(s) AWST Solution
Identify multiple promising sites for new development opportunities
Limited in-house GIS capabilities, schedule and budget
GIS-based Site Screening
Understand the competitiveness of your project
No on site data, no intel on competition’s potential advantages
Map-based energy assessment
Conduct MCP analysis on existing met tower data
Poor quality long-term reference station data Long Term VMM
Reduce uncertainty of wind resource assessment
Complex site, limited schedule and budget
openWind® EnterpriseUncertainty Module + windNavigator®PDG
ALBANY • BARCELONA • BANGALORE
463 NEW KARNER ROAD | ALBANY, NY 12205awstruepower.com | [email protected]
QUESTIONS
August 2010
AMBER TRENDELLDIRECTOR OF SALES AND MARKETING
518-213-0044 EX. [email protected]