london borough of enfield planning committee ......gideon whittingham david gittens andy higham tel...

LONDON BOROUGH OF ENFIELD

PLANNING COMMITTEE Date: 4 August 2020

Report of: Head of Planning

Contact Officer:Gideon Whittingham David GittensAndy Higham Tel No: 020 8132 1623

Ward: Enfield Highway

Application Number: 20/01021/FUL Category: Major

LOCATION: ARK John Keats Academy 52 Bell Lane EN3 5PA

PROPOSAL: Erection of 3 storey teaching block within existing courtyard and 2 storey temporary teaching block located on the Multi Use Games Area and Temporary Site Entrance on Bell Lane

Applicant Name & Address: Mrs Hannah Peat ARK John Keats Academy 52 Bell Lane EN3 5PA

Agent Name & Address: Mr Fran Yuill Focus Consultants Focus House Millennium Way West Phoenix Business Park Nottingham NG8 6AS

RECOMMENDATION: That planning permission be GRANTED subject to conditions.

1. Note for Members 1.1 This planning application is categorised as a “major” planning application and in

accordance with the scheme of delegation, is reported to Planning Committee for determination.

2. Recommendation / Conditions 2.1 That planning permission be GRANTED subject to the following conditions:

1. TIME LIMIT 2. DEVELOPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS 3. MATERIALS TO MATCH THOSE SPECIFIED 4. DETAILS OF LANDSCAPING (INCLUDING MEANS OF ENCLOSURE) 5. DETAILS OF REPLACEMENT TREES 6. DETAILS OF TREE PROTECTION 7. DETAILS OF PV PANELS 8. DETAILS OF SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGE STRATEGY / SUDS 9. DETAILS OF VERIFICATION REPORT OF SUDS 10. ENERGY STATEMENT 35% IMPROVEMENT 11. DETAILS OF ENERGY PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE 12. DETAILS OF BREEAM RATING VERIFICATION 13. DETAILS OF WATER CONSUMPTION 14. DETAILS OF BAT SURVEY 15. DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION METHODOLOGY 16. MUGA RESTORED

2.2 It is also requested that authority to finalise the wording of conditions under the

above headings, is given to the Head of Development Management to ensure they reflect any issues raised by Planning Committee and / or any reported updates to the meeting.

3. Executive Summary 3.1 The objective of the application is to redevelop existing facilities to suitably

incorporate sixth form pupils on site. 3.2 ARK John Keats Academy is consented to host 1860 pupils.

3.3 The demolition of an existing 2 storey standalone block for a replacement 3 storey

building would not involve an increase in consented pupil numbers but instead seeks to address accommodation issues specifically for the sixth form pupils.

3.4 A portion of the replacement building would be located upon land designated as Metropolitan Open Land (MOL).

3.5 The programme for the works indicates demolition to take place in late 2020, with

temporary accommodation installed on the Academy’s tennis courts (designated as MOL) until august 2021. The temporary accommodation would be removed, and the tennis courts made good once the replacement 3 storey building is in operation in the summer of 2021.

3.6 The development of additional floorspace within this existing school site for

educational use would be consistent with its present character and function. 3.7 The replacement building would be of a suitable appearance and form in relation

to the site and surrounding area. 3.8 The reasons for recommending approval of this application are:

o The principle of the replacement building and associated alterations to the site are appropriate given their size, form and detailed design. The proposal would not have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance upon the school buildings or the wider area and would protect the openness of the land designated as MOL.

o The temporary siting of accommodation on the tennis courts is considered

appropriate and would protect the openness of the land designated as MOL.

o The 3 storey replacement building, by virtue of its size, location and

proximity would not harm the amenity of occupying and neighbouring residents.

o The proposal would not cause any unacceptable harm upon highway safety

or the flow of traffic in the locality.

o The design and construction of the proposal would have appropriate regard to environmental sustainability issues including energy and water conservation, renewable energy generation, and efficient resource use.

o The proposal would replace where required and protect trees of amenity

and biodiversity value. 3.9 The development would be appropriate and in accordance with relevant National

and Regional Policy, Core Strategy and Development policies and for the reasons noted above.

4. Site & Surroundings 4.1 The site is located on the north side of Bell Lane and has historically

accommodated education facilities, formerly known as the Albany School and Oasis Hadley, the site now serves the Ark John Keats Academy.

4.2 The site for which this application relates is approximately 3.75 hectares

(37,524sqm.) in size. The school is also served by playing fields to the south of Bell Lane that is approximately 1.72 hectares (17,240 sqm.), however this site falls outside the scope of the application.

4.3 The application site is bound by a pedestrian walkway to the north which links

Hertford Road to Albany Park, to the east by the public open space of Albany Park and to the south and west by the highway of Bell Lane.

4.4 The playing fields are bound by Bell Lane to the north, Meadow Close and

Greenwood Avenue to the east, The Sunny Road to the south and Albany Park Avenue to the west.

4.5 The application site comprises a variety of 2 storey buildings, although many date

back to the original school which opened in 1939 and was designed by Frank Lee, significant extensions have subsequently taken place to modernise accommodation, particularly in 2013/2014 (See relevant history). The application site includes 2 Multi Use Games Areas (MUGA – to be known as Tennis Court and Football Pitch) along the eastern boundary with Albany Park, with amenity and tree lined areas sited in central courtyards and along the northern and western boundaries. Vehicle access is gained via Bell Lane, with a hard-surfaced area laid out for parking and circulation fronting the highway.

4.6 The application site, excluding the built land and car park fronting Bell Lane, is

designated as Metropolitan Open Land (MOL) totalling approximately 17,285sqm, as is the surrounding Albany Park.

4.7 To the west, the site adjoins residential development, including 2 high rise blocks

on Eastfield Road.

4.8 The Bell Lane Youth Centre and the Waverly Pre-school are located immediately to the south of the school site, fronting onto Bell Lane.

4.9 Further south and on the opposite side of Eastfield Road is the Eastfield Primary

School.

4.10 The application site is not located within a conservation area nor is it statutorily or locally listed.

4.11 The site is within an area with a public transport accessibility level (PTAL) of 1b

(Very Poor) to 2 (Poor). 5. Proposal 5.1 The following works are proposed:

• The demolition of an existing 2 storey standalone ‘science block’, located to the east of the site, adjacent to the tennis court MUGA. [10.8m in width x 12.5m in depth x 7.9m in height]

• The erection of a part 2 part 3 storey building aligning east to west [47.1m in width x 25.2m in depth x 12.7m in height], adjoining the existing eastern wing of the school. The building would be clad in a composite panel at upper level, brick at lower level. The building would be roofed with PV panels.

• The building would reduce the area of MOL on site by 164sqm (17,285sqm down to 17,121sqm – loss of 0.948%)

• The replacement building would result in 9 trees removed and replaced. 5.2 During construction, the following works are proposed:

• The erection of a 2 storey ‘H’ shaped block of cabins (7.2m in height x 16.8m in depth x 26.7m in width) would be installed over the Tennis Court MUGA, within the MOL. The block would include a central stair core, along with access ramps to either side. The cabins would be clad in Grey/Silver Plastic Coated Composite Panels, white uPVC windows and flat topped at roof level. The temporary accommodation would be removed and the tennis courts made good once the replacement 3 storey building is in operation.

• The formation of a vehicle entrance along Bell Lane

6. Consultation Statutory and Non-Statutory Consultees 6.1 The consultation responses have directed and facilitated the changes to the

development and applicable conditions have been added to secure policy compliant development:

• London Fire Brigade: The Commissioner is satisfied with the proposals. • Thames Water: Comments received. • Sport England: No objection subject to conditions • SUDS Team (Sustainable urban drainage systems): No objection subject to

conditions • Environmental Health Team: No objection

Public 6.2 Consultation letters were sent to 283 neighbouring and nearby properties.

6.3 A site notice was displayed from 03.07.2020 (expiring 24.07.2020) and a public

notice was displayed in the local press (Enfield Independent) from 10.06.2020 (expiring on 24.06.2020).

6.4 A respondent from an address on Eastfield Road raised the following comments:

• There are already several schools close together in Bell Lane and Eastfield

Road, currently the residential areas surrounding these schools are subjected to major congestion and inconsiderate parking at least 3 times daily from the school run traffic. As a local resident I am against any further expansion of the schools in this area, as this will lead to more disruption and inconvenience for all local residents, in the Canary Island Estate blocks and surrounding streets.

Officer’s response: see section on Land Use and Transport

6.5 The Member of Parliament for Enfield North Feryal Clark raised support as follows:

I would like to write in support of the application 20/01021/FUL, the redevelopment at the Ark John Keats Academy on Bell Lane. AJK is an outstanding and very over-subscribed school, with a track record of providing a brilliant education for the children of North Enfield. It is a key part of the local community and its continued prosperity and growth is vital to existing and future students. During my most recent visit to the school, I had the opportunity of speaking to some of the sixth form students. I had also seen the full range of

opportunities AJK offered local students. Not only does AJK provide a combination of A-levels and high-quality level 3 courses, it also supports students in their aspirations to move onto university and other forms of higher education. Among existing pupils there is a real desire from them and their families to continue their education at AJK. At this time, my understanding is that there is a higher number of applications than the current school, with existing space constraints, can accommodate. This has led to the school being unable to accept all pupils who meet the entry criteria and wish to stay. The new sixth form building is needed for the school to be able to continue to provide a great education to all our pupils. The low levels of attainment on entry, and high levels of ELA, mean that smaller classes are necessary in some groups to be able to accelerate the progress of the most disadvantaged. This has been successful, as there was no pupil premium progress gap in 2019, and EAL levels of progress have been really strong. Enfield is growing and we need to enable high quality educational institutions like AJK to grow with our community, and to continue to provide an outstanding educational offer to students from reception through to sixth form. I believe that it is in Enfield’s interest to enable the school to expand so it can continue to provide high quality educational opportunities to Enfield’s young people, and avoid the possibility of Enfield’s students having to look outside of the borough for their educational needs.

Officer’s response: see section on Land Use

7. Relevant Planning History 7.1 Known as Ark John Keats Academy:

• 20/00020/PREAPP – Proposed 6th form building. Closed 25 February 2020. • 19/01043/FUL - Erection of 3 storey teaching block to the northern boundary

and 2 storey temporary teaching block located on the existing tennis courts together with temporary site access onto Bell Lane. Application Withdrawn.

• 19/02235/FUL - Erection of a single storey glazed extension. Granted With

Conditions. 30 July 2019.

• P13-03220PLA - Use of existing school site and existing school buildings for an all through school (30 place Nursery, 3FE Primary School, 6FE Secondary School and 300 place Sixth Form), involving partial demolition of inner court buildings, D & T block, sixth form centre and toilet block to the west and

erection of a two storey extension to the north / west elevation to provide new primary school entrance, nursery and hall, 2-storey extension to the south elevation to provide a link teaching block, a 2-storey teaching block within the existing courtyard, extension to front to provide new entrance, canopy to side, replacement windows throughout, refurbishment of existing facade, reconfiguration of car park at front and associated landscaping works. Granted With Conditions 27 March 2014.

7.2 Known as Albany School:

• LBE/10/0024 - Erection of 2 single storey temporary modular buildings to

provide 2 form entry primary school accommodation with new pedestrian access from Bell Lane and re-instatement of pedestrian access to Albany park. Granted With Conditions. 03 Aug 2010

• TP/05/0476 - Single storey extension to provide new entrance and associated

offices to sports hall. Granted With Conditions. 27 April 2005

• TP/03/0363 - New changing accommodation. Application Withdrawn. 18 September 2003.

8. Relevant Planning Policies 8.1 National and Regional Policies National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) 2019 National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) 8.2 London Plan

Policy 3.16 Protection and Enhancement of Social Infrastructure Policy 3.18 Education Facilities Policy 5.1 Climate change mitigation Policy 5.2 Minimising carbon dioxide emissions Policy 5.3 Sustainable design and construction Policy 5.7 Renewable energy Policy 5.10 Urban greening Policy 5.11 Green roofs and development site environs Policy 5.12 Flood risk management Policy 5.13 Sustainable drainage Policy 5.14 Water quality and wastewater infrastructure Policy 5.15 Water use and supplies Policy 5.16 Waste self sufficiency Policy 6.9 Cycling Policy 6.13 Parking Policy 7.4 Local character Policy 7.6 Architecture Policy 7.17 Metropolitan Open Land Policy 7.19 Biodiversity and Access to Nature

8.3 The London Plan – Draft

A draft London Plan was published on 29 November 2017 for consultation purposes with a deadline for consultation of 2 March 2018. The current 2016 (The London Plan consolidated with alterations since 2011) is still the adopted Development Plan, but the Draft London Plan is a material consideration in planning decisions. The significance given to it is a matter for the decision makers, but it gains more weight as it moves through the process. It is anticipated that the publication of the final London Plan will be in the later end of 2020, and as such its weight, as a material consideration, is increasing.

8.4 Core Strategy

CP8 Education CP20 Sustainable Energy use and Energy Infrastructure CP21 Delivering Sustainable Water Supply, Drainage and Sewerage Infrastructure CP22 Delivering Sustainable Waste Management CP30 Maintaining and Improving the Quality of the Built and Open Environment CP33 Green Belt and Countryside CP34 Parks, Playing Fields and Other Open Spaces CP36 Biodiversity

8.5 DMD

DMD16 Provision of New Community Facilities DMD37 Achieving High Quality and Design-Led Development DMD38 Design Process DMD42 Design of Civic Buildings DMD45 Parking Standards and Layout DMD47 New Roads, Access and Servicing DMD49 Sustainable Design and Construction Statements DMD51 Energy Efficiency Standards DMD53 Low and Zero Carbon Technology DMD57 Responsible Sourcing of Materials, Waste Minimisation and Green Procurement DMD58 Water Efficiency DMD59 Avoiding and Reducing Flood Risk DMD60 Assessing Flood Risk DMD61 Managing Surface Water DMD71 Protection and Enhancement of Open Space DMD74 Playing Pitches DMD78 Nature Conservation DMD79 Ecological Enhancements DMD80 Trees on Development Sites DMD81 Landscaping

9. Analysis Background

9.1 Planning permission was granted (P13-03220PLA) and implemented for the following:

• Use of the existing school site for an all through school for a total of 1860

pupils comprising of a 30 place nursery, 3- form entry primary school (600 pupils), sixth form entry secondary school (900 pupils) and a 300 place sixth form, depending on provision.

• The demolition of the inner court buildings, D&T Block, sixth form centre and

toilet block and the erection of a two storey extension to provide a new primary school entrance, nursery and hall, a two storey extension to the south to provide a link teaching block and a two storey teaching block within the existing courtyard and associated landscaping.

• The proposal included a total of 68 car parking spaces, 8 disabled parking

spaces and 144 cycle parking spaces.

9.2 This scheme was considered against the Council’s current Core Strategy and the ARK John Keats Academy currently operates within the remit of this consent.

9.3 The proposal would not involve any increase in numbers consented, but seeks to address accommodation issues to improve facilities for sixth form pupils, hence the submission of this application to erect a new 3 storey building.

Land Use

10.1 As of 2019, the total number of pupils accommodated has been 1620. The applicant indicates the existing sixth form accommodation is undersized for 300 pupils and as a result currently serves 84 pupils.

10.2 To appropriately accommodate 300 sixth form pupils and eventually reach the

permitted 1860 total pupils in 2021, the applicant is seeking to redevelop part of the site and build a new sixth form centre.

10.3 The provision of additional floorspace for education purposes within this existing school site would be consistent with its character and function. Moreover, in the absence of the proposal involving an increase in numbers of staff and pupils over and above that which has already been consented, the additional floorspace is also acceptable in principle subject to the attainment of an acceptable design which remains appropriate to the visual amenities of the street scene.

10.4 Having regard to the current issues as outlined above, it is considered the principle

of this form of development is acceptable. Metropolitan Open Land

10.5 The application site, excluding the built land and car park fronting Bell Lane, is designated as Metropolitan Open Land (MOL), as is the surrounding Albany Park.

10.6 The 2 Multi Use Games Areas (MUGA – to be known as Tennis Court and Football Pitch) to the north and east of the site fall within the MOL and measure 2325sqm and 6430sqm respectively.

10.7 The permanent replacement building would reduce the area of MOL on site by

164sqm (17,285sqm down to 17,121sqm – loss of 0.948%). This area is currently hardstanding and emphasises the visual discontinuity between the adjoining playing MUGA and school building, thereby highlighting the limited quality of openness of this specific 164sqm of area. Whilst designated as MOL this area of land is already built upon and is therefore not “open”.

10.8 On a temporary basis, the proposal would require the siting of accommodation on

the tennis court during the construction process and would be removed following the occupation of the adjacent replacement structure, which itself falls outside of the MOL.

10.9 The fundamental aim of the NPPF is to prevent urban sprawl and protect the

openness of Green Belt from urban sprawl, and there is a general presumption against inappropriate development, which by definition is harmful to Green Belt/MOL. Paragraphs 89 and 90 of the NPPF state Local Planning Authorities should regard the construction of new buildings as inappropriate in Green Belt/MOL.

10.10 London Plan Policy 7.17 states that the strongest protection should be given to

London’s MOL and inappropriate development refused, except in very special circumstances, giving the same level of protection and status as the Green Belt designation.

10.11 When a development is found to be not inappropriate under Paragraph 89 or 90

of the NPPF or paragraph 7.56 of the London Plan, it should not be regarded as harmful to the openness of the Green Belt (Cited in Lee Valley Regional Park Authority, R (on the application of) v Epping Forest District Council and Anor (Rev1) [2016] EWCA Civ 404).

10.12 Therefore, development within the MOL which is not inappropriate should be

weighed against the form and any potential harm to the openness of the MOL.

10.13 The proposed 3 storey replacement building would provide additional accommodation for the school to operate to capacity.

10.14 Under Core Policy 34 of the Enfield Plan Core Strategy and DMD 71 of the Development Management Document, inappropriate development on land designated as Metropolitan Open Land will be refused except in very special circumstances. Development involving the loss of other open space will be resisted unless:

a. Replacement open space can be re-provided in the same locality and of better quality to support the delivery of the Council’s adopted Parks and Open Spaces Strategy; or

b. It has been demonstrated through the submission of an assessment that the open space in question is surplus to requirements.

10.15 Essential structures and facilities that would support the enjoyment of, and

maintain the openness of the open space will be acceptable provided that the size, siting, location, design and materials would be sympathetic and proportionate to the operational requirements of the open space that it supports.

10.16 However, as the building would not re-provide open space in the locality nor has it been demonstrated to be surplus to requirements, it would therefore be harmful within the terms of policy 34 and DMD71. Planning permission could only be justified under very special circumstances clearly outweighing the harm due to inappropriateness.

10.17 In this context, several factors combine in this case to produce the necessary very special circumstances. Firstly, the site is already built upon. It is presently occupied by hardstanding and in terms of its composition does not make a positive contribution to openness of the MOL.

10.18 Secondly, the building would result in a marginal loss of MOL, less than 1% adjacent to the built form and thirdly, when in place, it would be seen against the background of an extensive formation of school buildings of a similar size and scale. Although visible from Albany Park, it would be sited unobtrusively between the existing buildings. The proposal would not therefore intrude into any genuinely open parts of the MOL or have any material effect on perceptions of its openness.

10.19 The 2 storey ‘H’ shaped block of cabins would not fit within the national and local

exceptions however. The building would be sited on a temporary basis (less than 1-2 years), serving as decant accommodation until the replacement building becomes operational.

10.20 Given the developed nature of the site, it is not considered that the temporary use of the structure in the proposed location, by virtue of its size, siting, design and materials would result in a loss of openness. The development would not harm views through the site, nor would it appear out of keeping given the function of the site.

10.21 Having regard to the provisions of the NPPF, London Plan, Core Strategy and

Development Management Document as outlined above, it is considered the development where inappropriate would not result in undue harm to the character and openness of the MOL and is therefore acceptable.

Sports and Recreation

10.22 The loss of open space could lead to reduced opportunities for sports and

recreation, particularly given the function of the Multi Use Games Areas (MUGA) for which the decant accommodation shall be construction upon for 1 -2 years. The proposal would effectively diminish the opportunity to use the tennis courts for sports and recreation during the construction process of the adjacent replacement sixth form block.

10.23 DMD Policy 73 and 74 seeks to ensure that adequate provision of formal and

informal space for outdoor sports/children's play is met by developments and will continue to protect sports pitches across the borough to facilitate health, wellbeing and social cohesion.

10.24 The proposed development, albeit the temporary decant buildings, prejudices the

use, or leads to the loss of use, of land being used as a playing field or has been used as a playing field in the last five years. Therefore, the statutory consultation of Sport England commented as follows:

Although this represents a significant loss in the short term the submitted documentation explains that the school has a plan to mitigate the loss in relation to the curriculum, such as staggering school periods. It is also explained that there is no current community use of the facilities. On this basis, Sport England are willing to take a pragmatic view provided the temporary facilities are removed and the MUGA reinstated to, at least, its current condition as the long-term sporting provision at the site would be unaffected. In consequence, Sport England are of the view that the proposal broadly meets spirit exception E3 of our Playing Fields Policy in the long term and does not wish to raise an objection to this application

10.25 The absence of an objection by Sport England is subject to securing the removal

of all temporary buildings and engineering works from the MUGA and the area be restored within a year.

10.26 Having regard to the policy provisions and statutory consultee Sport England, it is

considered the short term loss of the MUGA, subject to suitable conditions for restoration is considered acceptable.

Character and Appearance Policy review

11.1 London Plan policies 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6 and 7.7, policy DMD 37: Achieving High Quality and Design-Led Development, seek to secure high quality design.

11.2 The site is currently occupied by a number of large interlinked buildings dating

back to the original school which opened in 1939 and was designed by Frank Lee. Significant extensions have subsequently taken place to modernise the

accommodation, particularly in 2013/2014 (See relevant history), which saw the demolition of the inner court buildings, design and technology block, sixth form centre and toilet block, to make way for a number modern extensions to improve the nursery, primary and secondary school and sixth form.

11.3 None of the site buildings are identified or designated as making a positive

contribution to the wider area, however they sit quietly within the site and in this sense contribute to the local scene to a limited degree.

11.4 The significance of the standalone building to be demolished, by virtue of its

relatively modern detailed design, scale, form and quality of materials is of limited value and therefore limited weight shall be given to their conservation. In the absence of making a positive contribution to the wider area, the complete demolition of this building is acceptable subject to a suitable replacement.

Design of replacement buildings

11.5 The proposal would introduce a contemporary replacement building that, by virtue

of its form and materials, addresses its relationship with the character and appearance of the wider site. Although the extension would rise above the adjacent buildings, its location to the centre of the site within an inner courtyard, detailed design relief to the facades and elements of depth, would provide a degree of variation which would break up the façade and lessen its impact. As a result, the additional height compared with its neighbouring educational buildings is not considered to be detrimental from a design or scale perspective.

11.6 The scheme has been progressed and negotiated to ensure it would sit

comfortably within its environment. The immediate built environment, although predominantly residential, is varied in appearance, ranging from the rendered two-storey post war houses in Albany Park Avenue, the semi-detached brick houses of the interwar period on Grove Gardens, to the post war 13-storey tower blocks of Guernsey House and Jersey House.

11.7 The adjacent Bell Lane Youth Centre is of Victorian style, whilst the Waverly Pre-

school consists of prefabricated buildings.

11.8 Within this context, the established construction material is brickwork, and in this regard, the extension is considerate to its context. The extension would be detailed with brickwork of a similar size, colour and texture to the existing buildings, while upper levels would be vertically clad in panels that add a tone and material of visual interest.

11.9 The proposal, accounting for criteria held in the preceding paragraphs, would

provide a new development of a high-quality design, introducing modernity in a sympathetic manner that is intended for its educational function.

11.10 The Council would be unlikely to grant consent for erection of cabins sited on the tennis courts on a permanent basis as this would, among other considerations, harm the open character and appearance of the wider area. However, given its temporary purpose, officers consider this structure would be sited for an insufficient length of time to be of significance in the planning context. Nevertheless, the temporary permission sought for the structure would allow for the decant of existing facilities whilst allowing time to construct permanent facilities. Within this context the benefits of permitting the development outweigh the limited (both in terms of permanence and degree) harm which would be caused as a result of the location of the temporary structures.

Conclusion

11.11 The proposed extensions are considered appropriate and would not result in

detrimental harm to the character and appearance of the existing buildings and the wider area. The proposal therefore to complies with Policy DMD37.

Traffic Generation, Access and Parking

Policy review

12.1 Policy 6.3 of the London Plan confirms that the impact of development proposals on transport capacity and the transport network are fully assessed. The proposal must comply with policies cycling (Policy 6.9), walking (Policy 6.10), tackling congestion (Policy 6.11) and parking (Policy 6.13). Policies DMD45 and DMD47 provide the criteria upon which developments will be assessed with regard to parking standards / layout and access / servicing. Baseline Traffic Generation

12.2 Permission was granted in 2013 (See relevant history) to provide for a total of 1860

pupils (including 300 sixth form) and accounted for this impact with mitigation measures forming part of the S106 Legal Agreement and Conditions including a Transport Assessment covering:

• PERS (Pedestrian Environment Review System) audit to identify walking

routes to the school and improvements needed. • Parking restrictions along Bell Lane required to improve visibility. • CCTV to enforce the parking restrictions on Bell Lane. • Reinstatement of existing access (to potentially create additional footway

for pedestrians/creation of new access. • Soft measures including a Travel Plan and Traffic Management Plan. This

will require staff involvement and is related to managing the traffic around the primary school access.

12.3 This application seeks to provide for a total of 1860 pupils (including 300 sixth form) and therefore with no increase in pupil numbers across the site the impact would be of no greater than the existing arrangement or ‘fall-back’ position and remains secure by the S106 Legal Agreement and Conditions.

Access and Servicing

12.4 Vehicular access, including servicing of the site would remain off Bell Lane

opposite Grove Gardens.

12.5 Pedestrian access is from three points, one on the Bell Lane side road and two from Bell Lane east/west section. The side road access is for the primary school, and the other two mainly for the secondary school, although access to the primary is still possible.

Parking

12.6 The parking provision (vehicle and cycle) for the school would remain, given that

no greater intensification would take place than the existing arrangement.

Construction phasing

12.7 With a view to the practical approach of development, the school would require remaining operational throughout the construction process. This presents an operational challenge for the school and the contractors to remain an educational facility capable of undertaking its responsibilities, as well as a safe and secure area for the redevelopment of the site by the contractors. The phasing of construction, with minimal disruption to the operation of the schools would be critical to the success of this scheme.

12.8 To ensure the operation and function of the site, a separate vehicle access for all

construction vehicles route is proposed off Bell Lane and adjacent to The Bell Lane Youth Centre. This would require the removal of an existing metal fence, a number of trees and potential impact upon a bus stop. Officers are satisfied that the impact of this construction route on a temporary basis would not create (or add to existing) traffic congestion in the local area.

Construction Management Plan

12.9 The proposal is also likely to lead to a variety of amenity issues for local people (e.g. noise, vibration, air quality, temporary loss of parking, etc). The Council needs to ensure that the development can be implemented without being detrimental to amenity or the safe and efficient operation of the highway network in the local area.

12.10 Construction management plans (CMPs) are used to demonstrate how

developments will minimise impacts from the movement of goods and materials during the construction process (including any demolition works). A draft CMP has

been submitted in support of the planning application. This provides some useful information which suggests that the proposed works could be constructed without being detrimental to the safe and efficient operation of the highway network in the local area. However a far more detailed CMP would need to be approved by the Council prior to any works commencing on site.

Conclusion

12.11 The proposal would not cause any unacceptable harm upon highway safety or the

flow of traffic in the locality. The proposal therefore to complies with Policies DMD45 and DMD47.

Impact on Residential Amenity

Policy review

13.1 Policy 7.6 of the London Plan states that developments should have appropriate regard to their surroundings, and that they improve the environment in terms of residential amenity. Policy CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy seeks to ensure that new developments are high quality and design-led, having regards to their context. They should help to deliver Core Strategy policy CP9 in supporting community cohesion by promoting attractive, safe, accessible and inclusive neighbourhoods. Policy DMD8 states that new developments should preserve amenity in terms of daylight, sunlight, outlook, privacy, overlooking, noise and disturbance. Neighbouring properties

13.2 The surrounding area is predominantly residential and arranged in relation to the

development area (as opposed to the boundary of the application site) as follows:

• North o Nos. 43 – 79 (odds) and No.100 Connop Road are at a distance of more

than 150m. • South

o Nos.103 – 133 Bell Lane (odds) are at a distance of approximately 59m • West

o 28 – 50 Bell Lane o Guernsey House (Nos.1-124) and Jersey House (Nos.1-124) Eastfield

Road are at a distance of more than 130m.

13.3 The proposed development would be situated within the confines of the site with modest extensions following demolition, together with a larger 3 storey sixth form block within the existing central courtyard. Within this context, the impact of the proposal upon residential amenity in terms of daylight, sunlight, outlook, privacy and overlooking would be minimal, with no impact any greater than the existing arrangement.

13.4 The total number of pupils would remain 1860, as per ref:P13-03220PLA, with no impact in terms of noise and disturbance, any greater than the existing and consented arrangement.

Conclusion

13.5 It is considered the proposal would have an acceptable relationship to neighbouring properties. Although there would be disruption during construction, this can be given little weight during the assessment of the planning merits of the proposed development and conditions will be imposed to secure a construction management plan.

Sustainable Design and Construction

14.1 London Plan policies 5.2 and 5.3 and policies DMD 51: Energy Efficiency Standards seek to secure energy efficiencies and reduce the emissions of CO2. Policy DMD49 of the Development Management Document states that all new development must achieve the highest sustainable design and construction standards having regard to technical feasibility and economic viability. Policy DMD61 (Managing Surface Water) expects a Drainage Strategy will be required for all developments to demonstrate how proposed measures manage surface water as close to its source as possible and follow the drainage hierarchy in the London Plan.

Energy

14.2 The applicant has provided an Energy Statement that confirms the proposals would meet the 35% CO2 reduction over Part L of Building regulations (2013). This will be achieved through the installation of photovoltaic panels. This shall be conditioned to ensure the energy performance.

14.3 The application is accompanied by a BREEAM pre-assessment which indicates a 'Very Good' rating for the scheme. The assumptions made are reasonable and in relation to the above potential condition have committed to continued monitoring of energy performance.

Sustainability and Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS)

14.4 The SuDS approach is acceptable; however further details are required and shall be secured by conditions.

Conclusion

14.5 The design and construction of the proposal would have appropriate regard to environmental sustainability issues including energy and water conservation, renewable energy generation, and efficient resource use. The proposal therefore to complies with Policies DMD49, DMD51, DMD58 and DMD61.

Landscaping / Trees / Biodiversity

15.1 Policy DMD 80 retains and protects trees of amenity and biodiversity value on the site and in adjacent sites that may be affected by proposals. Policy DMD 81 ensures development must provide high quality landscaping that enhances the local environment. Policy DMD 78 and 79 ensures ecological enhancement from sites.

15.2 The site contains a number of trees across the site, with the majority along the

boundary being mature and those within the inner courtyard being young and required planting by the 2013 permission (P13-03220PLA).

15.3 All trees on site however, fall outside of a conservation area and no trees are

covered with a designation (Trees in the conservation areas are statutorily protected - Tree Preservation Order).

Tree protection / retention measures

15.4 Tree removal is required to implement the proposal, namely 9 young trees planted

in 2013 (Cherry - Prunus Avium 'Plena'; Tc Lime Tree - Tilia Cortdata; Af Maple - Acer X Freemanii) to make way for the replacement 3 storey block. The age and visual amenity of the trees are such that their replacement in within the courtyard and adjacent area is considered acceptable.

15.5 To ensure the operation and function of the site, a separate vehicle access for all

construction vehicles route is proposed off Bell Lane and adjacent to The Bell Lane Youth Centre. This would require the removal of an existing metal fence and upwards of 6 conifer trees. Although these trees provide visual interest, their replacement is considered acceptable.

15.6 With respect to all other trees and those in close proximity to the development works, conditions shall secure their protection against damage throughout the period of building and other operations

Biodiversity

15.7 The site is of relatively low ecological value with the exception that some buildings

have the potential to provide habitats for bats. A condition shall ensure the appropriate surveys are taken prior to commencement to ensure that the Council fulfils its duties under the Conservation (Natural Habitats &c.) Regulations 1994.

Conclusion

15.8 The proposal would retain and protect trees of amenity and biodiversity value. The

proposal therefore to complies with Policies DMD78, DMD79, DMD80 and DMD81.

16. Conclusion

16.1 The principle of the replacement building and associated alterations to the site are

appropriate given their size, form and detailed design. The proposal would not have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance upon the school buildings or the wider area and would protect the openness of the land designated as MOL.

16.2 The temporary siting of accommodation on the tennis courts is considered appropriate and would protect the openness of the land designated as MOL.

16.3 The 3 storey replacement building, by virtue of its size, location and proximity would not harm the amenity of occupying and neighbouring residents.

16.4 The proposal would not cause any unacceptable harm upon highway safety or the flow of traffic in the locality.

16.5 The design and construction of the proposal would have appropriate regard to environmental sustainability issues including energy and water conservation, renewable energy generation, and efficient resource use.

16.6 The proposal would replace where required and protect trees of amenity and biodiversity value.

Temporary Classrooms

Proposed 6th Form Block

A 16 Jan 2020 Application site shown in red andNorth Point added.


Ark John Keats Academy

Location Plan

A

R1687-05

19/12/2019

1:1250@ A3

FY

Focus Consultants 2010 LLPFocus House, Millennium Way West,

Phoenix Business Park,Nottingham NG8 6AS

Telephone 0115 976 5050Facsimilie 0115 979 5151

Website www.focus-consultants.co.ukEmail [email protected]

P r e l i m i n a r y F o r A p p r o v a l

T e n d e r I s s u e C o n s t r u c t i o n I s s u e

P l a n n i n g I s s u e B u i l d i n g R e g . I s s u e

A s B u i l t

© copyright

D r a w i n g I s s u e N o t e s :

R e v I s s u e D a t e R e v i s i o n N o t e s :

R e v i s i o n

C l i e n t

D r a w i n g N o .

D r a w i n g T i t l e

D a t e

S c a l e

D r a w n

Copyright of this drawing belongs to Focus Consultants 2010 LLP and itssubsidiary and associated companies and no part thereof may bereproduced or utilised in any way whatsoever without the prior writtenconsent of Focus Consultants 2010 LLP.

Figured dimensions shall be taken in preference to scaled dimensions andany discrepancies or errors are to be referred to the Designer.Contractors, sub-contractors and suppliers must verify all dimensions onsite before commencing work or making any fabrication drawings.

P r o j e c t

C h e c k e d

RECYCLE TAP

GAS

TAP

TAP

TAP

TAP

TAP

84.88 m²SCIENCE CLASSROOM 4

F-0-07

63.16 m²CLASS (2)

C-0-13

63.55 m²CLASS (1)

C-0-11

60.58 m²CLASSC-0-10

80.97 m²MUSIC ROOM

D-0-03

6.39 m²ST.

D-0-19

8.35 m²MUSIC PRACTICE 6

D-0-028.33 m²

MUSIC PRACTICE 7D-0-01

61.39 m²ENSEMBLE ROOM

D-0-04

40.18 m²GROUP ROOM (4)

E-0-03

65.36 m²FITNESSE-0-05

27.02 m²EXAM TABLE STORE

E-0-14

44.75 m²GIRLS CHANGING

E-0-16

57.08 m²MATHS 3

G-0-12

57.73 m²MATHS 7

G-0-08

57.15 m²MATHS 6

G-0-09

57.07 m²MATHS 5

G-0-10

57.15 m²MATHS 4

G-0-11

57.51 m²MATHS 2

G-0-1357.51 m²

ENGLISH 2G-0-02

57.08 m²ENGLISH 3

G-0-03

57.15 m²ENGLISH 4

G-0-04

57.07 m²ENGLISH 5

G-0-05

57.15 m²ENGLISH 6

G-0-06

57.73 m²ENGLISH 7

G-0-07

81.21 m²ENGLISH 1

G-0-01

81.24 m²MATHS 1G-0-14

97.34 m²FOOD ROOM

H-0-06

12.09 m²FOOD PREP

H-0-07

166.59 m²ACTIVITY

E-0-04

4.95 m²ST.

E-0-34

7.7 m²BOYS WC

E-0-31

5.82 m²ACC WCE-0-33

38.21 m²SPORTS INTERNAL STORAGE

E-0-22

34.95 m²BOYS CHANGING

E-0-26

27.1 m²STAFF SPORTS OFFICE

E-0-02

675.96 m²SPORTS HALL

E-0-01


F-0-01

41 m²SCIENCE PREP 1

F-0-03

88.35 m²SCIENCE STUDIO

F-0-06

22.63 m²HEAD OF HOUSE OFFICE

F-0-04


F-0-05

3.26 m²STAFF WC

F-0-17

12.98 m²STAIR CORE NO.5

F-0-13

59.96 m²CORRIDOR

F-0-09

65.81 m²CORRIDOR

E-0-08

91.13 m²RECITAL ROOM

D-0-14 10.67 m²RECORDING

D-0-11


D-0-12


D-0-138.79 m²

MUSIC PRACTICE 3D-0-08


D-0-10

69.5

8 m

²C

OR

RID

OR

D-0

-15

26.96 m²MUSIC FACULTY OFFICE

D-0-07

7.94 m²BOYS WC

E-0-13

NotEnclosed

ACC WCE-0-11

68.66 m²CLASSC-0-14

73.68 m²YR 1 (3)C-0-16

9.32 m²HUB ROOM 01

C-0-34

48.78 m²STAFF ROOM

C-0-17


C-0-20

14.83 m²MEETING ROOM

B-0-02

6.47 m²COMMONS 1 STORE

B-0-18

20.79 m²MAIN OFFICE

B-0-0411.18 m²MI ROOM

B-0-06

2.58 m²STAFF/VISITOR WC

B-0-22

64.51 m²RECEPTION (1)

C-0-05


C-0-03


C-0-01

62.72 m²

SPECIALISTPRACRTICAL

C-0-09

6.46 m²SEN OFFICE

C-0-07

3.36 m²CLEANER STORE

C-0-36


C-0-28


C-0-22

13 m²RECEPTION WC

C-0-02

15.27 m²HEAD OFFICE

C-0-19

9.79 m²MEETING ROOM

C-0-18

220.76 m²KITCHEN

A-0-03

54.32 m²COMMONS (2)

A-0-01

334.64 m²DININGA-0-02

44.59 m²DINING STORE

A-0-06

188.8 m²LRC

J-0-12

2.73 m²LIBRARY STORE

J-0-31

24.51 m²MEETING ROOM (1)

J-0-04

22.51 m²CENTRAL STORE

J-0-25


J-0-17

15.36 m²RECORDS STORE

J-0-30

39.84 m²ADMIN OFFICE

J-0-11

84.22 m²CORRIDOR

J-0-15

20.84 m²PREMISES MANAGER

J-0-01

5.85 m²CORRIDOR

J-0-16


J-0-05

15.78 m²DEPUTY OFFICE

J-0-08

13.93 m²MI/SICKJ-0-07 16.95 m²

REPROJ-0-06

91.44 m²TEXTILES WORKSHOP

I-0-06

275.2 m²COMMONS

I-0-07142.85 m²

CORRIDORI-0-10

94.16 m²DRAMAI-0-09

126.65 m²6TH FORM AREA

I-0-01

20.35 m²SECLUSION ROOM

I-0-02

40.45 m²SEN CLASSROOM

I-0-03

20.36 m²SENCO OFFICE / STORE

I-0-1134.81 m²

GROUP ROOM 3I-0-04

21.25 m²D+T FACULTY OFFICE

I-0-05

5.04 m²ACC WC

I-0-12

3.06 m²STAFF WC

I-0-1317.21 m²BOYS WC

I-0-15

16.24 m²GIRLS WC

I-0-16

42.13 m²MULTI MATERIALS PREP

H-0-02


H-0-09

89.84 m²MULTI MATERIALS WORKSHOP 2

H-0-03

31.03 m²MATHS FACULTY OFFICE

G-0-16

4.57 m²MATHS STORE

G-0-25


G-0-23

2.11 m²STAFF WC

G-0-19

2.25 m²STAFF WC

G-0-20

4.04 m²ACC WCG-0-21

31.21 m²ENGLISH FACULTY OFFICE

G-0-15

15.61 m²BOYS WC

G-0-18

15.97 m²GIRLS WC

G-0-22

7.73 m²BOYS WC

A-0-08


H-0-12

6.3 m²ACC CHANGE

E-0-15

7.62 m²GIRLS WC

A-0-09

10.44 m²CORRIDOR

A-0-043.71 m²ACC WC

A-0-11

8.79 m²ST.

A-0-10

7.47 m²ELECA-0-14

83.15 m²STAGEI-0-08

2.3

m²

CLE

AN

ER

STO

RE

E-0

-24

19.02 m²PLANTH-0-13

80.7

5 m

²C

OR

RID

OR

E-0

-06

4.65 m²ENGLISH STORE

G-0-24


C-0-12

9.11 m²CAREERS OFFICE

J-0-14

9.07 m²SEN STORE

C-0-37


B-0-233.59 m²ACC WCB-0-24

VOID OVER

VOID OVER

12.28 m²SHOWER

E-0-19

15.76 m²INTAKE ROOM

J-0-23

9.43 m²SERVER / COMMS

J-0-22


J-0-24

19.96 m²IT TECHNICIAN OFFICE

J-0-02

8.67 m²wc

B-0-10

7.52 m²WC

B-0-11

3.4 m²ST.

B-0-12

11.24 m²ST.

B-0-19

2.84 m²ST.

B-0-20

2.85 m²STAFF WC

B-0-13

2.85 m²PUPIL WC

B-0-14

143.66 m²COMMONS (1)

B-0-03

4.76 m²REPROB-0-05

5.43 m²ACC WCB-0-16

5.82 m²ST.

C-0-29

11.78 m²SCIENCE PREP 2

F-0-08


F-0-14

34.2

7 m

²C

OR

RID

OR

H-0

-08

25.9

9 m

²C

OR

RID

OR

H-0

-10


F-0-02

5.59 m²SHOWER

E-0-27 7.98 m²SHOWER

E-0-28

3.07 m²STAFF CHANGING

E-0-30

2.2 m²CORRIDOR

E-0-10

17.21 m²ST.

E-0-35

5.18 m²EXAM ST.

D-0-21

50.89 m²GROUP ROOM 1

D-0-06

27.8 m²EXAMS OFFICE

D-0-05

25.27 m²PUPIL WC

C-0-35

Drinking Fountain

Chilled waterbottle filling

10.67 m²LIBRARY OFFICE

J-0-13

8.42 m²LOBBYJ-0-18


H-0-01

3.24 m²LOBBYE-0-09

1.47

m²

PLA

NT

E-0

-236.75 m²

GIRLS WCE-0-18

7.88 m²SHOWERS

E-0-17

10.96 m²BOYS WC

E-0-25

35.5 m²CORRIDOR

J-0-19

14.2

1 m

²M

AIN

TEN

AN

CE

STO

RE

J-0-

21

12.77 m²RECEPTION WC

C-0-06

3.32 m²CORRIDOR

B-0-07

15.82 m²SEN CLASS

C-0-08

3.04 m²STAFF WC

I-0-14

OUT OFSCOPE


D-0-09

LIFT 1

LIFT 2

LIFT 3

4.48 m²ACC WCB-0-15

3.08 m²STAFF WC

B-0-17

68.75 m²YR 1 (2)C-0-15

5.01 m²CORRIDOR

C-0-24

5.01 m²CORRIDOR

C-0-23

49.45 m²CORRIDOR

C-0-21

23.91 m²CORRIDOR

B-0-08

8.83 m²INTERVIEW ROOM

J-0-09

11.1

6 m

²P

AS

TOR

AL

SU

PP

OR

T O

FFIC

EJ-

0-10


J-0-26 3.02 m²STAFF/VISITOR WC

J-0-27


J-0-28

3.38 m²ACC WC

J-0-29

3.62 m²STAFF WC

F-0-16

0.54 m²ST.

D-0-20

9.33 m²ST

E-0-21

3.13 m²CLEANERS STORE

E-0-20

3.42 m²LOBBYE-0-07

8.41 m²ELEC.G-0-27 1.73 m²

ST.G-0-26

6.16 m²MATERIALS ST.

H-0-05


H-0-04

12.73 m²RECEPTION WC

C-0-04

38.96 m²CORRIDOR

H-0-11

92 m2NURSERYE

B-0-01.1

5.84 m²HUB ROOM 02

E-0-22.2

7.19 m²HUB ROOM 04

I-0-01.2

3.52 m²STAFF WC

C-0-31

2.28 m²PUPIL WC

C-0-322.03 m²CL. ST.C-0-30

2.96 m²PUPIL WC

C-0-33

2.01 m²RISERC-0-38



Existing Ground Floor Plan

R1687-01

20/12/2019

1:500 @ A1

FY

KB








A s B u i l t

© copyright



R e v i s i o n

C l i e n t

D r a w i n g N o .


D a t e

S c a l e

D r a w n



P r o j e c t

C h e c k e d

57.51 m²HUMANITIES 1

G-1-01


G-1-02


G-1-03


G-1-04


G-1-05


G-1-06


G-1-07


G-1-08

57.08 m²MFL 1G-1-09

57.15 m²MFL 2G-1-10

57.08 m²MFL 3G-1-11

57.51 m²MFL 4G-1-12

31.06 m²MFL FACULTY OFFICE

G-1-15

4.57 m²MFL STG-1-23


G-1-21

2.55 m²STAFF WC

G-1-17

2.73 m²STAFF WC

G-1-18

4.04 m²ACC WCG-1-19

31.21 m²HUMANITIES FACULTY OFFICE

G-1-14

17.13 m²GIRLS WC

G-1-20

17.03 m²BOYS WC

G-1-16


J-1-07

2.96 m²STAFF WC

J-1-12

4.64 m²ACC WC

J-1-10

19.09 m²PRINCIPAL

J-1-03

13.68 m²PRINCIPAL PA

J-1-02

13.28 m²FINANCE OFFICE

J-1-01

79.9 m²ICT ROOM 1

I-1-03

14.87 m²IT FACULTY OFFICE

I-1-01

11.67 m²CORRIDOR

I-1-04

2.57 m²BOYS WC

I-1-08

2.57 m²GIRLS WC

I-1-07

3.2 m²ACC WC

I-1-06

14.6 m²ART FACULTY OFFICE

I-1-02


H-1-10

80.3 m²ART ROOM

H-1-03

30.65 m²CORRIDOR

H-1-08


H-1-07

65.54 m²SMALL ART ROOM 1

H-1-02

15.53 m²CORRIDOR

H-1-06


H-1-01


F-1-07

3.27 m²BOYS WC

F-1-13

12.54 m²STAIR CORE

F-1-10

38.3 m²CORRIDOR

F-1-09


F-1-02

89.63 m²SCIENCE LABORATORY

F-1-01

18.17 m²STAIR CORE

F-1-08

60.86 m²CLASSC-1-06

63.46 m²CLASS (3)

C-1-07

63.33 m²CLASS (4)

C-1-09

9.14 m²CLASS STORE

C-1-19

60.82 m²CLASSC-1-05

71.4 m²CLASSC-1-03

25.84 m²BOYS WC

C-1-20

71.29 m²CLASS (5)

C-1-11

71.6 m²CLASSC-1-02

72.54 m²CLASS (7)

C-1-01


C-1-15

60.76 m²CLASS (8)

C-1-13

48.72 m²LRC

C-1-14

59.09 m²

CLASSYR 6

B-1-02

68.91 m²CLASS (6)

C-1-12

68.9 m²CLASSC-1-10

29.94 m²STAFF OFFICE

C-1-04

13.64 m²STAIR CORE No. 3

C-1-17

86.91 m²CORRIDOR

B-1-03

6.85 m²ST.

B-1-113.08 m²

PUPIL WCB-1-08

4.84 m²ACC WCB-1-09

49.52 m²

SPECIALISTPRACTICAL

B-1-013.41 m²

KILNH-1-04

13.45 m²FRD OFFICE

J-1-04

3.51 m²ACC WCC-1-24

26.23 m²GROUP ROOM

C-1-08

2.34 m²STAFF WC

C-1-23

2.44 m²STAFF WC

C-1-22

22.27 m²SCIENCE FACULTY OFFICE

F-1-06


F-1-03

OPEN TO BELOW

2.96 m²STAFF WC

J-1-11

4.2 m²SHOWER ROOM

J-1-13

17.19 m²LOBBYJ-1-09

130.56 m²STAFF WORK AREA

J-1-06

50.93 m²CONFERENCE ROOM

J-1-05

51.85 m²CORRIDOR

H-1-09

3.69 m²GIRLS WC

F-1-14

5.2 m²HUB 05 & 06

G-1-26

4.65 m²HUMANITIES STORE

G-1-22

3.08 m²PUPIL WC

B-1-07

6.88 m²ICT STORE

I-1-05

VOID


F-1-04


F-1-056.19 m²

CORRIDORF-1-11

8.83 m²STAIR CORE

F-1-12

3.08 m²STAFF WC

B-1-06

2.99 m²STAFF WC

B-1-05

3.08 m²STAFF WC

B-1-04

63.08 m²CORRIDOR

J-1-08


B-1-10

7.38 m²HUB ROOM 03

H-1-11

1.73 m²ST.

G-1-25

ICT ROOM 2H-1-05

VOID OVER

VOID OVER

PUPIL WC

RECYCLE TAP

GAS

TAP

TAP

TAP

TAP

TAP



Existing First Floor Plan

R1687-02

20/12/2019

1:500 @ A1

FY

KB








A s B u i l t

© copyright



R e v i s i o n

C l i e n t

D r a w i n g N o .


D a t e

S c a l e

D r a w n



P r o j e c t

C h e c k e d

TAP

TAP

1.39 m²MBLE ROOMD-0-04


E-0-03


57.08 m²MATHS 3

G-0-12

57.73 m²MATHS 7

G-0-08

57.15 m²MATHS 6

G-0-09

57.07 m²MATHS 5

G-0-10

57.15 m²MATHS 4

G-0-11

57.51 m²MATHS 2

G-0-1357.51 m²

ENGLISH 2G-0-02

57.08 m²ENGLISH 3

G-0-03

57.15 m²ENGLISH 4

G-0-04

57.07 m²ENGLISH 5

G-0-05

57.15 m²ENGLISH 6

G-0-06

57.73 m²ENGLISH 7

G-0-07

81.21 m²ENGLISH 1

G-0-01

81.24 m²MATHS 1G-0-14

97.34 m²FOOD ROOM

H-0-06

12.09 m²FOOD PREP

H-0-07

166.59 m²ACTIVITY

E-0-04

4.95 m²ST.

E-0-34

7.7 m²BOYS WC

E-0-31

5.82 m²ACC WCE-0-33

27.1 m²STAFF SPORTS OFFICE


F-0-01


F-0-03


F-0-06


F-0-04


F-0-05

3.26 m²STAFF WC

F-0-17


F-0-13

59.96 m²CORRIDOR

F-0-09

65.81 m²CORRIDOR

E-0-08

1

CE 2 8.79 m²MUSIC PRACTICE 3

D-0-08


D-0-10

69.5

8 m

²C

OR

RID

OR

D-0

-15

26.96 m²MUSIC FACULTY OFFICE

D-0-07

7.94 m²BOYS WC

E-0-13

NotEnclosed

ACC WCE-0-11

188.8 m²LRC

J-0-12

2.73 m²LIBRARY STORE

J-0-31


J-0-04

22.51 m²CENTRAL STORE

J-0-25


J-0-17

15.36 m²RECORDS STORE

J-0-30

39.84 m²ADMIN OFFICE

J-0-11

84.22 m²CORRIDOR

J-0-15

20.84 m²PREMISES MANAGER

J-0-01

5.85 m²CORRIDOR

J-0-16


J-0-05

15.78 m²DEPUTY OFFICE

J-0-08

13.93 m²MI/SICKJ-0-07 16.95 m²

REPROJ-0-06

91.44 m²TEXTILES WORKSHOP

I-0-06

275.2 m²COMMONS

I-0-07142.85 m²

CORRIDORI-0-10

DRAMAI-0-09

126.65 m²6TH FORM AREA

I-0-01


I-0-02


I-0-03

20.36 m²SENCO OFFICE / STORE

I-0-1134.81 m²

GROUP ROOM 3I-0-04


I-0-05

5.04 m²ACC WC

I-0-12

3.06 m²STAFF WC

I-0-1317.21 m²BOYS WC

I-0-15

16.24 m²GIRLS WC

I-0-16


H-0-02


H-0-09


H-0-03


G-0-16

4.57 m²MATHS STORE

G-0-25


G-0-23

2.11 m²STAFF WC

G-0-19

2.25 m²STAFF WC

G-0-20

4.04 m²ACC WCG-0-21


G-0-15

15.61 m²BOYS WC

G-0-18

15.97 m²GIRLS WC

G-0-22


H-0-12

6.3 m²ACC CHANGE

E-0-15

7.47 m²ELECA-0-14

83.15 m²STAGEI-0-08

2.3

m²

CLE

AN

ER

STO

RE

E-0

-24

19.02 m²PLANTH-0-13

80.7

5 m

²C

OR

RID

OR

E-0

-06


G-0-24

9.11 m²CAREERS OFFICE

J-0-14

VOID OVER

VOID OVER

15.76 m²INTAKE ROOM

J-0-23


J-0-22


J-0-24

19.96 m²IT TECHNICIAN OFFICE

J-0-02

34.2

7 m

²C

OR

RID

OR

H-0

-08

25.9

9 m

²C

OR

RID

OR

H-0

-10


F-0-02

17.21 m²ST.

E-0-35

5.18 m²EXAM ST.

D-0-21

50.89 m²GROUP ROOM 1

D-0-06

27.8 m²EXAMS OFFICE

D-0-05

Drinking Fountain

Chilled waterbottle filling

10.67 m²LIBRARY OFFICE

J-0-13

8.42 m²LOBBYJ-0-18

STUDY ROOMH-0-01

3.24 m²LOBBYE-0-09

35.5 m²CORRIDOR

J-0-19

14.2

1 m

²M

AIN

TEN

AN

CE

STO

RE

J-0-

21

3.04 m²STAFF WC

I-0-14


D-0-09

8.83 m²INTERVIEW ROOM

J-0-09

11.1

6 m

²P

AS

TOR

AL

SU

PP

OR

T O

FFIC

EJ-

0-10



J-0-27


J-0-28

3.38 m²ACC WC

J-0-29

3.62 m²STAFF WC

F-0-16


E-0-20

3.42 m²LOBBYE-0-07

8.41 m²ELEC.G-0-27 1.73 m²

ST.G-0-26


H-0-05


H-0-04

38.96 m²CORRIDOR

H-0-11

5.84 m²HUB ROOM 02

E-0-22.2

7.19 m²HUB ROOM 04

I-0-01.2

2260

Rise and fall sink

Fume cupboardFume cupboard

HD

HD HD

BFS

BFS

CORRIDORK-0-01

24.3 m2

DISTRIBUTIONK-0-02

2.7 m2

LIFTK-0-033.5 m2

STAIR 2K-0-04

25.2 m2

ENTRANCEK-0-057.9 m2

HUBK-0-06

10.4 m2

SCIENCE 1K-0-07

86.8 m2

CLEANERK-0-082.2 m2

RefugeWC 1K-0-10

30.8 m2

DIS WC 1K-0-094.8 m2

LOBBYK-0-11

23.3 m2

ENTRANCE

LINK

OFFICEK-0-12

14.7 m2

ROOMK-0-14

97.6 m2

COMMON

CORRIDOR 1K-0-13

49.7 m2

CLASSROOM 2K-0-16

60.8 m2

CLASSROOM 1K-0-17

60.6 m2

RefugeSTAIR 1K-0-18

34.7 m2

LABORATORY 1K-0-19

79.7 m2

SCIENCELABORATORY 2

K-0-2378.1 m2

SCIENCE

STORE 2K-0-226.4 m2

CHEMICAL STOREK-0-211.2m2

PREP ROOMK-0-2018.1 m2

3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 2200

7700

9700

8400

3600

3600

3600

2850

350

3265 10175

4010

2680 2110

1000

1900 1

600

2200

1500

5645

3705

1400

1045

1805

900

1400

3440 3

790

3440

8270

1047

0

3255

300

7690

1205

2075

2900

5000

7650

8157

5047

Fum

e cu

pboa

rd

50 Lockers50 Lockers50 Lockers25 Lockers50 Lockers50 Lockers

750

760

1000

420

1055

420

710

495

790

1055

470

25 Lockers

Fume cupboard

1400

Rise and fall sink

420

710

Rise and fall sink

650

420

710

1055

495

790

(28 + 2)(0 + 2)

(28 + 2)

(30 + 1) (30 + 1) (50 + 1)

(50 + 1)

(0 + 3)

(30 + 2)

38100

6750

9015

1121

535

00

1801

5

36050

10000

2975

0



Proposed Site Plan

.

R1687 - 60

21 /03/ 2020

1:200 @ A1

FY

KB








A s B u i l t

© copyright



R e v i s i o n

C l i e n t

D r a w i n g N o .


D a t e

S c a l e

D r a w n



P r o j e c t

C h e c k e d

Scale 1:200

Existing MUGA

Existing Astroturf Pitch

Existing Canopies

98.451

4No 30 person classrooms

4No 24 person classrooms stair

Temp Drains

Temp Services

New Drains

Temp Services

Temp Services

Solid Hoarding

Hoarding

Solid

Hoa

rdin

g

Site Compound

Temp Partition

Landscaping removed andtemp hardstanding created

Site Welfare/Offices

Solid HoardingS

EmergencyAccess Only

Emer

genc

y

Acce

ss O

nly

4400

1030

0

995081008800

1930

087

00

9900

2000

8692

Footprint of Proposed 6th FormBlock shown dotted.

Existing 2 storey Science Blockto be demolished hatched red.

CraneBase

Hoarding

Hoar

ding

Hoarding

BUSSTOP

BUSSTOPBUSSTOP

Existing 4m high conifer hedgingto be removed shown dotted. To be replaced withindigenous trees on completion of works.

Temporary concrete apronTo be removed on completionof the works.

Existing low height railings to beremoved and reinstated on completion.

Existing security fencing to be modified to incorporate2No secure gates. Fencing to be made good on completion.

FOOTPATH

HIGHWAY

FOOTPATH

Design of gate and entrance to be confirmedfollowing completion of a Swept Path Analysisfor construction vehicles. Details to be confirmedin the Construction Management Plan

Existing Tennis Courts

IL 97.950CL 99.620Existing

150 diaIL 98.118CL 99.600MH1

IL 98.451CL 99.500MH2

IL 98.572CL 99.750MH3

IL 98.627CL 99.500MH4

IL 98.691CL 99.800MH5

IL 98.831CL 99.800MH6

IL 98.561CL 99.500MH7

150 dia

150 dia

100 dia

100 dia 100 dia

100 dia

100 dia

IL 98.751CL 99.500MH7

IL 98.940CL 99.500MH7

IL 99.040CL 99.500MH7

Exist

ing G

as M

ain

Gas M

ain to

be re

move

d

show

n dott

ed

New

Gas M

ain

New Gas Main

New Gas Main

New Gas Main

Gas Main to be rem

oved

shown dotted

Existing fencing to be removed,stored on siteand reconstructed on completion of the works.

Existing sports surface and markings to be reinstatedon completion of the works. The construction of thesurface is unknown at this stage but it is assumed thatthe whole of the surface should be replaced inclusiveof all markings and surface colours.

2671

Exis

ting

Gas

Mai

n

Exis

ting

Gas

Mai

n Temp gates into Muster PointCrash Tunnel forfire escape

Emergency Egress Only



Temporary Accommodation and Site Set Up Plan

A

R1687 - 20

19 /12/ 2019

1:250@ A1

FY

KB








A s B u i l t

© copyright



R e v i s i o n

C l i e n t

D r a w i n g N o .


D a t e

S c a l e

D r a w n



P r o j e c t

C h e c k e d

A Feb 2020 Updated drainage and gas main diversion.

50

2750

2500

3200

2750

2500

3200

2750

2500

975

50

70045

0

3770

1340

50

3200

975

50

2750

2500

TAP57.08 m²MATHS 3

G-0-12

57.73 m²MATHS 7

G-0-08

57.15 m²MATHS 6

G-0-09

57.07 m²MATHS 5

G-0-10

57.15 m²MATHS 4

G-0-11

57.51 m²MATHS 2

G-0-13

5.82 m²ACC WCE-0-33


F-0-06


F-0-04


F-0-05

3.26 m²STAFF WC

F-0-17


F-0-13

59.96 m²CORRIDOR

F-0-09


H-0-02

H 0 09

19.02 m²PLANTH-0-13

34.2

7 m

²C

OR

RID

OR

H-0

-08

STUDY ROOMH-0-01

3.62 m²STAFF WC

F-0-16

2260

Rise and fall sink


HD

HD HD

BFS

BFS

CORRIDORK-0-01

24.3 m2

DISTRIBUTIONK-0-02

2.7 m2

LIFTK-0-033.5 m2

STAIR 2K-0-04

25.2 m2


HUBK-0-06

10.4 m2

SCIENCE 1K-0-07

86.8 m2

CLEANERK-0-082.2 m2

RefugeWC 1K-0-10

30.8 m2

DIS WC 1K-0-094.8 m2

LOBBYK-0-11

23.3 m2

ENTRANCE

LINK

OFFICEK-0-12

14.7 m2

ROOMK-0-14

97.6 m2

COMMON

CORRIDOR 1K-0-13

49.7 m2

CLASSROOM 2K-0-16

60.8 m2

CLASSROOM 1K-0-17

60.6 m2

RefugeSTAIR 1K-0-18

34.7 m2

LABORATORY 1K-0-19

79.7 m2

SCIENCELABORATORY 2

K-0-2378.1 m2

SCIENCE

STORE 2K-0-226.4 m2



3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 2200

7700

9700

8400

3600

3600

3600

2850

350

3265 10175

4010

2680 2110

1000

1900 1

600

2200

1500

5645

3705

1400

1045

1805

900

1400

3440 3

790

3440

8270

1047

0

3255

300

7690

1205

2075

2900

5000

7650

8157

5047

Fum

e cu

pboa

rd


750

760

1000

420

1055

420

710

495

790

1055

470

25 Lockers

Fume cupboard

1400

Rise and fall sink

420

710

Rise and fall sink

650

420

710

1055

495

790

(28 + 2)(0 + 2)

(28 + 2)

(30 + 1) (30 + 1) (50 + 1)

(50 + 1)

(0 + 3)

(30 + 2)

38100

6750

9015

1121

535

00

1801

5

36050

10000



Planning Sections

.

R1687 - 52

19 /02/ 2020

1:50@ A1

FY

KB








A s B u i l t

© copyright



R e v i s i o n

C l i e n t

D r a w i n g N o .


D a t e

S c a l e

D r a w n



P r o j e c t

C h e c k e d

K e y

2

2 1

1

S e c t i o n 1 : 1

S e c t i o n 2 : 2

NTS

Stair CoreCloaks

Classroom

Store

Store

Classroom

Classroom

Classroom

Cloaks Store Store

7200

996281008762

3200

1680

2

1928

6 StoreStore

StoreCloaks

Stair Core

Classroom

Classroom

Classroom

Classroom

Cloaks



Temporary Accommodation Plans and Elevations

-

R1687 - 21

20 /03/ 2020

1:100@ A1

FY

KB








A s B u i l t

© copyright



R e v i s i o n

C l i e n t

D r a w i n g N o .


D a t e

S c a l e

D r a w n



P r o j e c t

C h e c k e d

A Feb 2020 Updated drainage and gas main diversion.

First Floor Plan

Ground Floor Plan

Elevation D

Elevation C

Elevation B

Elevation A

Key

A B

C

D

Dark Grey Fascia Panels

Grey/Silver Plastic Coated Composite Panels

White uPVC Windows

TAP

22.63 m²91.61 m²

SCIENCE CLASSROOM 3

19.02 m²PLANTH-0-13

34.2

7 m

²C

OR

RID

OR

H-0

-08

STUDY ROOMH-0-01

2260

Rise and fall sink


HD

HD HD

BFS

BFS

CORRIDORK-0-01

24.3 m2

DISTRIBUTIONK-0-02

2.7 m2

LIFTK-0-033.5 m2

STAIR 2K-0-04

25.2 m2


HUBK-0-06

10.4 m2

SCIENCE 1K-0-07

86.8 m2

CLEANERK-0-082.2 m2

RefugeWC 1K-0-10

30.8 m2

DIS WC 1K-0-094.8 m2

LOBBYK-0-11

23.3 m2

ENTRANCE

LINK

OFFICEK-0-12

14.7 m2

ROOMK-0-14

97.6 m2

COMMON

CORRIDOR 1K-0-13

49.7 m2

CLASSROOM 2K-0-16

60.8 m2

CLASSROOM 1K-0-17

60.6 m2

RefugeSTAIR 1K-0-18

34.7 m2

LABORATORY 1K-0-19

79.7 m2

SCIENCELABORATORY 2

K-0-2378.1 m2

SCIENCE

STORE 2K-0-226.4 m2



3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 2200

7700

9700

8400

3600

3600

3600

2850

350

3265 10175

4010

2680 2110

1000

1900 1

600

2200

1500

5645

3705

1400

1045

1805

900

1400

3440 3

790

3440

8270

1047

0

3255

300

7690

1205

2075

2900

5000

7650

8157

5047

Fum

e cu

pboa

rd


750

760

1000

420

1055

420

710

495

790

1055

470

25 Lockers

Fume cupboard

1400

Rise and fall sink

420

710

Rise and fall sink

650

420

710

1055

495

790

(28 + 2)(0 + 2)

(28 + 2)

(30 + 1) (30 + 1) (50 + 1)

(50 + 1)

(0 + 3)

(30 + 2)

38100

6750

9015

1121

535

00

1801

5

36050


H-1-02


H-1-01

SC

IEN

CE

BFS

SCIENCE 23K-1-06

86.8 m2

STAIR 2K-1-01

35.0 m2

Refuge

DISTRIBUTIONK-1-02

2.7 m2

LIFTK-1-033.5 m2

LOBBYK-1-04

7.3 m2

OfficeK-1-05

17.0 m2

DIS WC 2K-1-086.2 m2

WC 2K-1-093.1 m2

CORRIDOR 2K-1-07

35.5 m2

CORRIDOR 3K-1-08

37.0 m2

WC 2K-1-103.3 m2

CLASSROOM 3K-1-10

50.9 m2

CLASSROOM 4K-1-11

50.8 m2

CLASSROOM 5K-1-12

50.8 m2

CLASSROOM 6K-1-13

50.8 m2

CLASSROOM 7K-1-14

49.5 m2

STAIR 1K-1-15

25.3 m2

CLASSROOM 8K-1-16

52.2 m2

CLASSROOM 9K-1-17

47.5 m2

STORE 5K-1-195.7 m2

CLASSROOM 10K-1-20

53.7 m2

CLASSROOM 11K-1-21

50.8 m2

Refuge

3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 2200

7700

9700

8400

3500

3600

3600

35002850

350

3265 6845 7030 7030

7715

2110 8270

6850 7030 7030 7030 7050

7650

2080

7200

2080

7200

5700

900

1400

3260

1205

2075

1047

0

1650 1650

1500

2750

1500

5m43210

LINEAR SCALE 1:125

STORE 6K-1-222.8 m2

STORE 4K-1-182.8 m2

(30 + 2)

(26 + 1)(26 + 1)(26 + 1)(26 + 1)(26 + 1)

(26 + 1) (26 + 1)

(24 + 1) (24 + 1)

(0 + 3)

TAP


E-0-03


57.08 m²MATHS 3

G-0-12

57.73 m²MATHS 7

G-0-08

57.15 m²MATHS 6

G-0-09

57.07 m²MATHS 5

G-0-10

57.15 m²MATHS 4

G-0-11

57.51 m²MATHS 2

G-0-1357.51 m²

ENGLISH 2G-0-02

57.08 m²ENGLISH 3

G-0-03

57.15 m²ENGLISH 4

G-0-04

57.07 m²ENGLISH 5

G-0-05

57.15 m²ENGLISH 6

G-0-06

57.73 m²ENGLISH 7

G-0-07

81.21 m²ENGLISH 1

G-0-01

81.24 m²MATHS 1G-0-14

166.59 m²ACTIVITY

E-0-04

4.95 m²ST.

E-0-34

7.7 m²BOYS WC

E-0-31

5.82 m²ACC WCE-0-33


F-0-01


F-0-03


F-0-06


F-0-04


F-0-05

3.26 m²STAFF WC

F-0-17


F-0-13

59.96 m²CORRIDOR

F-0-09

65.81 m²CORRIDOR

E-0-08

7.94 m²BOYS WC

E-0-13

NotEnclosed

ACC WCE-0-11

24 51 m²MEETING ROOM (1)

J-0-04

CENTRAL STOREJ-0-25

14 89 m²MEETING ROOM (2)

J-0-05126.65 m²

6TH FORM AREAI-0-01


I-0-02


I-0-03

20 36 ²SENCO OFFICE / STORE

I-0-1134.81 m²

GROUP ROOM 3I-0-04


I-0-05


H-0-02


H-0-09


H-0-03


G-0-16

4.57 m²MATHS STORE

G-0-25


G-0-23

2.11 m²STAFF WC

G-0-19

2.25 m²STAFF WC

G-0-20

4.04 m²ACC WCG-0-21


G-0-15

15.61 m²BOYS WC

G-0-18

15.97 m²GIRLS WC

G-0-22

6.3 m²

2.3

mC

LEA

NE

RE

-0-

19.02 m²PLANTH-0-13


G-0-24

VOID OVER

VOID OVER

/ COMMS0-24

34.2

7 m

²C

OR

RID

OR

H-0

-08

25.9

9 m

²C

OR

RID

OR

H-0

-10


F-0-02

17.21 m²ST.

E-0-35

STUDY ROOMH-0-01

3.24 m²LOBBY



J-0-27

STAFF/VISITOR WCJ-0-28

3.62 m²STAFF WC

F-0-16


3.42 m²LOBBY

8.41 m²ELEC.G-0-27 1.73 m²

ST.G-0-26


H-0-05


H-0-04

5.84 m²HUB ROOM 02

2260

CORRIDORK-0-01

24.3 m2

DISTRIBUTIONK-0-02

2.7 m2

LIFTK-0-033.5 m2

STAIR 2K-0-04

25.2 m2


HUBK-0-06

10.4 m2

SCIENCE 1K-0-07

86.8 m2

CLEANERK-0-082.2 m2

RefugeWC 1K-0-10

30.8 m2

DIS WC 1K-0-094.8 m2

LOBBYK-0-11

23.3 m2

ENTRANCE

LINK

OFFICEK-0-12

14.7 m2

ROOMK-0-14

97.6 m2

COMMON

CORRIDOR 1K-0-13

49.7 m2

CLASSROOM 2K-0-16

60.8 m2

CLASSROOM 1K-0-17

60.6 m2

RefugeSTAIR 1K-0-18

34.7 m2

LABORATORY 1K-0-19

79.7 m2

SCIENCELABORATORY 2

K-0-2378.1 m2

SCIENCE

STORE 2K-0-226.4 m2





Ground and First Floor Plans

A

R1687 - 50

19 /02/ 2020

1:100@ A1

FY

KB








A s B u i l t

© copyright



R e v i s i o n

C l i e n t

D r a w i n g N o .


D a t e

S

london borough of enfield planning committee ......gideon whittingham david gittens andy higham tel...

Documents