low noise smart sensor for mems resistive microphone 2013

Upload: arellanoruiz

Post on 16-Oct-2015

62 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Low-Noise Smart Sensor Based on Silicon Nanowire for MEMS Resistive Microphone

    J.Nebhen,E. Savary, W. Rahajandraibe, C. Dufaza, S. Meillre, E. Kussener, H. Barthelmy

    Aix Marseille University, CNRS, IM2NP UMR 7334, 13451, Marseille, France.

    [email protected]

    J. Czarny, A. Walther

    CEA-LETI 17 rue des Martyrs

    38054 Grenoble, France [email protected]

    AbstractThe design of CMOS integrated circuits dedicated to hybrid integration of a MEMS resistive microphone with readout interface is presented. Audio sensing is achieved with an innovative low-cost technology that implements piezoresistive detection in MEMS devices with single crystal silicon nanowires. The complete circuit includes a custom designed analog front-end consisting of a sensor conditioning and a fourth order single bit continuous-time sigma-delta modulator (CT-M). The complete interface circuit exhibits a current consumption of 2mA. The obtained smart-sensor features a reduced output data rate that is suitable for a wireless sensor network with direct transmission of the raw data to a remote base station.

    I. INTRODUCTION UDIO acquisition systems are among the fastest growing consumer products such as smart phones, multimedia

    portable PCs and video cameras. All these systems need the development of new devices, both on the transducer and on the front-end circuit to satisfy their demand for continuous miniaturization and increase of their performances. Silicon microphones are one of the rapidly maturing areas of MEMS sensors owing to their improved aspects over the conventional Electret-Condenser-Microphones (ECM) [1].

    Silicon microphones exhibit improved aspects over ECMs such as compatibility with standard fabrication and assembly procedures, reduced size, low-power consumption, higher immunity to mechanical shocks and low temperature coefficient. For each reason, silicon microphones become a viable candidate for applications where conventional ECMs are applied. It opens-up the possibility of considering them in novel applications such as microphone sensor for enhanced acoustic performance [2]. However, interfacing to MEMS microphones gives rise to a challenging necessity of addressing the low-noise, low-power and high-performance aspects of the interface at the same time. MEMS microphones suffer from sensitivity deterioration owing to the inevitable variation in gauge resistance. Since Microphones have a relatively larger operational bandwidth (10Hz10kHz), sensitivity is sometimes traded-off by employing specific mechanical structures [3], to achieve a flat response in the whole audio band. The large frequency band causes the parasitic capacitances to suffer from dielectric-dispersion, which can ultimately cause distortion in the readout.

    We propose a smart-sensor design dedicated to auditive sensor nodes based on a novel micro-sensor technology called Micro- & Nano-Electromechanical Systems (M&NEMS) [4] that uses silicon nanowires as strain gauges built inside

    MEMS devices. This particular detection scheme makes these sensors different from most of the low-cost microphones, which are built with polysilicon and use a capacitive detection. Therefore, the readout circuit driving the sensor formed by a conditioning circuit and a low-noise analog-to-digital converter (ADC) must be very accurate and robust in order to handle the typically weak sensor output signals. The output signals of the sensor are also affected by offset voltage. In practice, offset is subject to temperature and manufacturing process variations, thus causing a shift in the signal range provided by the sensor.

    In this paper, an ADC based on CT-M has been used for several reasons [5]. On one hand, the noise-shaping performed by CT-M allows high resolution in the band of interest, with low noise and low power consumption, in addition, the action of feedback renders CT-M very linear. On the other hand, the principle of the current sensing devices fits in with the topology of the CT-M, allowing total integration of the sensor in the converter structure [6-7]. To reduce noise, we have implemented a new architecture to connect the sensor with readout interface. We propose to replace the input resistors of the CT-M by the silicon nanowire gauge with nominal resistance of 4k.

    The rest of the paper is organized as following: an overview of the micro-sensor technology featuring silicon nanowires as strain gauges, is described in section II. This particular technology requires the design of a specific conditioning and readout system, which is described in section III. Section IV presents the architecture-level considerations of the CT-M. CMOS implementation of the integrated circuit (ASIC) is briefly described in section V and section VI concludes the paper.

    II. SENSING DEVICE MEMS microphone was developed at CEA-LETI and it is

    based on so-called M&NEMS technological platform that allows integration of various sensors on one Silicon die [8]. This technology, which uses suspended Silicon piezo-resistive nanogauges as detection means, has already been applied to inertial sensors and has shown to be promising for size reduction or performance improvement. Transducer presented in Fig. 1 consists of four rigid micro beams placed between the inlet vents that guide the sound waves and outlet vents that enable pressure equilibration in a back cavity. Micro-slits between the beams and top and bottom wafers enable the motion of the beams while ensuring pressure drop from one to the other side of the beam. Stress induced by the motion of a

    A

    978-1-4673-4642-9/13/$31.00 2013 IEEE

  • Figure 1. Cross-sectional scheme of the microphone with acoustic configuration and sensing elements.

    Figure 2. Top view of the micro-beams and the nanogauge.

    beam inside suspended piezo-resistive Si gauges is transduced into resistance variations and measured by use of Wheatstone bridge architecture. The gauges are arranged into full Wheatstone bridge in such manner that, on the occurrence of sound pressure, two gauges will be compressed while the other two will be stretched. Such sensor architecture ensures self-cancelation of random accelerations.

    The MEMS fabrication is carried out at CEA-LETI clean room with typical micro-electronic process. Final shape of MEMS part with zoom on nanogauge and rectangles indicating inlet (blue) and outlet (green) vents is shown in Fig. 2. NEMS microphone exhibits 30 dB of Equivalent Input Noise (EIN) with a resolution of 95 nV/bits. Analytical calculation shows that 74 dB SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio) could be achieved with biasing current of 100 A and readout circuit featuring 6 nV/Hz input referred noise.

    III. M&NEMS SENSOR READOUT CIRCTUIT Audio applications including hearing aids implant involve

    large dynamic range and low power consumption. Acoustic vibration lower than 30 dB SPL (Sound Pressure Level) must be resolved while sound pressure over 110 dB SPL must not generate harmonic distortion. Commercially available digital output MEMS microphones feature 30 dB SPL of equivalent input referred noise, power consumption lies in the mA range with supply voltage of 2.5 V. The proposed M&NEMS microphone targets input referred noise of 5 dB SPL lower than commonly used MEMS microphones.

    The M&NEMS analog front-end is depicted in Fig. 3. It is composed of a sensor biasing circuit and a continuous time

    Figure 3. M&NEMS Sensor analog front-end

    sigma delta modulator used as read out circuit. The Wheatstone bridge, composed by the nanowire gauges is biased with a voltage controlled constant current sources. Common mode voltage at modulator input is maintained at Vdd/2 with a servo loop build around A1 that equate source and sink current through the bridge. The differential current Iin flowing through the modulator is proportional to the gauge resistance imbalance induced by acoustic vibrations.

    Note that a modulator (CT-M) follows directly the Wheatstone bridge rather than an instrumentation amplifier (IA). This proposed readout circuit exhibits improved aspects over traditional architecture since the two voltage preamplifiers used in classical IA topology have been omitted, leading to simplest implementation and, a priori, lower noise and power consumption. Single-bit modulator is well suited to achieve high-resolution digital representation in spite of impairment limitation of most advanced technological node. Interfacing with standard audio processor will be accomplished with the appropriate decimation filter.

    Resolution is first limited by sensor self noise as well as its biasing current. The noise from the sensor is composed of i) Brownian motion acting on the mechanical structure causing random resistance variations, ii) flicker noise due to semiconductor biasing and iii) thermal noise. Increasing the sensor current bias increases the useful signal level but also the Brownian and Fliker noise, thus SNR improvement with stronger biasing is limited. Next noise contribution comes from the first amplifier where, once again, more power is involved to rise signal to noise ratio.

    For high sensitivity of the microphone, the system was designed with a trade off between, noise performance, and power consumption where an optimal repartition of the current budget between the sensor bias and the modulators amplifier building blocks has to be achieved. Cascaded continuous time integrator feed-forward sigma delta seems to be the best ADC topology to accomplish the involved trade off. First, continuous time integrator provides intrinsic anti-aliasing filtering [9] saving filter stage power consumption; second, feed-forward implementation reduces integrators output swing requirement [10] making amplifier design easier; third, unlike switched capacitor integrator, amplifier settling time requirement is relaxed, so as the saved power budget can be allocated to input stage in favor of noise performance. Modulator order was set to handle dynamic range of 10 dB above sensor dynamic to allow for a software post-processing compensation of the sensor drift caused by temperature variations.

    CT#M'

    R1=R2=R3=R4'='4'k'M&NEMS'sensor'

    Iin

    VCM'Vbias'

    Inlet Sound waves

    Nanogauge Microbeam Outlet

  • IV. ANALOG-TO-DIGITAL CONVERSION A. System design

    The oversampling ratio (OSR) of the modulator was set to 64 to push quantization noise out of the 10 kHz bandwidth whereas complying with standards digital audio clock sampling frequency of 3.072 MHz. With a fourth order noise shaping, theoretical signal to quantization noise ratio (SQNR) of 127 dB is possible. In the current design, the circuit resolution will be limited by electronic noise. Allowed SNR degradation margin is estimated to be sufficient to incorporate elements non-idealities loss in the whole system performance. The coefficients of the modulator have been derived from [11] and have been computed from Matlab sigma-delta ToolBox based on the invariant impulse response theorem, they are scaled to limit integrators output voltage swing to make low voltage operation possible without rail-to-rail amplifier topology. Modulator system topology is shown in Fig. 4, where ci (i=2 to 4) represents the integrator coefficient, and ai (i=1 to 4) represents the feed-forward coefficient. It was also stated in the literature that this topology offers good stability of the loop [12].

    The finite gain and frequency bandwidth of real amplifier used in integrators play important roles in the accuracy of the integration stages. It has an impact on noise shaping and may be responsible of SNR degradation. From simulation results it was found that a DC gain of 60 dB with 6 MHz unity gain bandwidth keeps time constant integration close to ideal value. Finally, facing standard CMOS amplifier performance, requirements for gain and bandwidth are rather relaxed. Behavioral simulation performed with Simulink achieves 121

    Figure 4. Sigma-delta topology

    Figure 5. Modulator output spectrum

    dB SQNR. The modulator output spectrum is shown in Fig. 5 with a 1 kHz test tone used as reference signal. The circuit has been implemented on 65nm CMOS technology. However only 0.28 m transistor (GO2) with 2.5-V supply voltage, offering better noise performances compared to GO1 implementation has been used. All the integrators are realized with active-RC filter to guarantee linearity over full signal range. In addition, its virtual ground relaxes the input range constraint on the amplifier, which is in favor to low-voltage operation. B. Noise calculation As it was discussed upper, input stage noise performance is critical. The main noise sources at the input stage come from the equivalent input resistors of the nanowire gauge R1//R3, the DAC resistors RDAC, and the amplifier. The contributions of noise sources to the input-referred noise can be derived as [13].

    ( ) ( )22

    2 2 2 21 3 1 3, , 1/ / 3 , ,2

    / / / /2 1DACn in n R R n R n amp

    DACDAC

    R R R Rv v v v

    RR

    + + +

    (1)

    A noise-efficient and gain-enhanced fully-differential two-stage amplifier is developed for the modulator. The fully-differential structure provides large output swing, even-order harmonic suppression, and good PSRR/CMRR performance. Two-stage amplifier is stabilized by the compensation capacitors (CC). This topology isolates the gain and output swing requirements [14]. To ensure that the output common-mode level remains in the middle of supply voltage, a common-mode-feedback circuit (CMFB) is necessary in the active-load fully-differential amplifier to control its common-mode voltage. CMOS operational amplifier exhibits Flicker noise and thermal noise components. For typical bias conditions and device geometries, the Flicker noise is generally larger than the thermal noise for frequencies below 10Hz 10kHz.

    An amplifier achieving an open-loop DC gain of 65 dB, a phase margin of 62, and a unity-gain bandwidth of 16 MHz has been implemented for the CT-M.

    Figure 6. Layout of the CMOS ASIC in 0.28m CMOS process: a) CT-Modulator, b) Instrumentation Amplifier, c)M&NEMS sensor bias, d) Compensation Cell, e) Decoupling capactor.

    SQNR%=%121%dB%@%1kHz%

  • Figure 7. Equivalent input-referred noise of the readout circuit.

    The equivalent input referred noise of the fully-differential two-stage amplifier exhibits 6 nV/Hz density at 1 kHz with a power consumption of 750 W.

    V. OVERVIEW OF THE CMOS ASIC A readout circuit related test chip has been fully integrated

    and implemented on 0.28-m CMOS technology. High-resistive poly-silicon resistors and metalinsulatormetal (MIM) capacitors has been adopted for passive devices due to their high linearity. Fig. 6 shows the full layout of the chip including the I/O pads. The active circuit is composed by the CT-M, sensor bias, compensation cell, and decoupling capacitor. An isolated instrumentation amplifier has been implemented for comparison. The test chip occupies 1 mm2. Post-layout simulation of the complete chip has been done for verification. The total current consumption is 2 mA, the additional power comes from the analog part of the compensation cell required by the active pads. The equivalent input referred noise is shown in Fig. 7. As we can state, a noise density of 7 nV/Hz is achieved within the frequency range from 10 Hz to 10 kHz confirming the theoretical value.

    VI. CONCLUSION

    A new smart audio nano-sensor based on CEA-LETIs M&NEMS technology has been presented. A custom-designed electronic front-end performs amplification and signal readout. Our main concerns were noise, flexibility and power consumption. The front-end operation was verified and a low noise level was simulated. An ADC system based on a 1-bit CT-M allows for a high resolution with no calibration. To reduce noise, we have proposed to replace the input resistors of the M by the silicon nanowire gauge. This smart sensor is thus adequate for a hearing aids implant monitoring system with remote processing of the raw sensor data. The test chip has been sent to fabrication for validation on Silicon.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENT This work has been supported by the French National

    Research Agency (ANR) in the frame of its program P2N (project nANR 2011 NANO 026).

    REFERENCES [1] Report from Yole Development, SIMM05: Silicon Microphone

    Market 2005 From Si microphone to acoustic modules, Sept. 2005. [2] B. Margesin, A. Faes, F. Giacomozzi, A. Bagolini, M. Zen,Fabrication

    of Piston-type Condenser Microphone with structured polysilicondiaphragm, 8th Italian Conf. on Sensors and Microsystems, 2003.

    [3] W. Yun, R. T. Howe P.R. Gray Surface micromachined, digitallyforce-Balanced accelerometer with integrated CMOS detection circuitry,Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, 22-25 Jun 1992, USA.

    [4] P. Robert & al., M&NEMS : A new approach for ultra-low cost 3D inertial sensor, IEEE Sensors 2009 Conference, 25-28 oct. 2009, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp. 963-966.

    [5] J. Silva, U. Moon, J. Steensgaard, and G. C. Temes, Wideband lowdistortion delta-sigma ADC topology, Electron. Lett., vol. 37, no. 12,pp. 737738, Jun. 2001.

    [6] J. Wu, G. K. Fedder, L. R. Carley, A Low-Noise Low-Offset Capacitive Sensing Amplifier for a 50ug/Hz Monolithic CMOSMEMS Accelerometer, IEEE JSSC, Vol. 39, No. 5, May 2004.

    [7] N. Verma, A.P. Chandrakasan, An Ultra-Low Energy 12-bit Rate-Resolution Scalable SAR ADC for Wireless Sensor Nodes, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol.42, No. 6, Jun. 2007, pp. 1196-1205

    [8] P. Robert, P. Rey, A. Berthelot, G. Jourdan, Y. Deimerly, S. Louwers, J. Bon, F. X. Boillot, and J. Collet, M&NEMS: a technological platform for 10-axis sensor, SSI Conference, Amsterdam, March 2013.

    [9] M. Ortmanns, Y. Manoli, F.Gerfers., A new kind of low-power multibit third order continuous-time lowpass modulator, IEEE International Symposium on, vol. 3, pp.293-296, Aout 2002.

    [10] M. Ortamanns, Y. Manoli, A 1V, 12-bit wideband continuous-time modulator for UMTS applications, Circuit and Systems., vol 1, pp921-924, May 2003.

    [11] J. Liang, D.A. Johns, A Frequency-Scalable 15-bit Incremental ADCfor Low Power Sensor Applications, IEEE International Symposiumon Circuits and Systems, May 30th Jun. 2nd, 2010, Paris, France, pp.2418-2421.

    [12] C. Hsin-Liang, C. Po-Sheng, C. Jen-Shiun, A Low-Offset, Low-NoiseSigma-Delta Modulator with Pseudorandom Chopper-StabilizationTechnique, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I, Vol. 56, No.12, december 2009.

    [13] F. Gerfers, M. Ortmanns, and Y. Manoli, A 1.5-V, 12-bit powerefficientcontinuous-time third-order modulator, IEEE J. Solid-StateCircuits, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 13431352, Aug. 2003.

    [14] L. Yao, M. Steyaert, and W. Sansen, A 0.8 V, 8 W CMOS OTA with50 dB gain and 1.2 MHz GBW in 18 pF load, in Proc. Eur. Solid-StateCircuits Conf., Sep. 2003, pp. 297300.

    Noise&oor&of&&7&nV/Hz&@&10&kHz&&&